TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Satafly Archive

View 1 posts and 315 comments by Satafly on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

DiscussionSatafly/r/MensRights17/01/15 04:26 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

No idea. I thought this subreddit was about women getting treated equally as men in regards to when men get treated like shit. I don't know how this relates to bad treatment of men.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/11/17 03:45 PM
1

I've obviously upset you. Sorry dude.
/r/MensRights30/10/17 06:06 PM
0

I'll spell it out: I'm not the only person saying this. I am not the only person calling this subreddit bullshit. Open your eyes.
/r/MensRights30/10/17 06:00 PM
1

Hey man I've been lurking on this sub recently and it seems that there's at least one comment per post with the same theme as mine, so not it's not just me. But if it helps you sleep at night...
/r/MensRights30/10/17 03:01 PM
-4

Yeah that sounds like a nice little excuse to ignore the bullshit in this sub.
/r/MensRights30/10/17 06:30 AM
-1

You writing a memoir?
/r/MensRights30/10/17 06:28 AM
9

But you, you're so much better right?
/r/MensRights30/10/17 04:35 AM
1

It's a wonderful, very positive mindset and I really hope you manage to keep to it as long as you can. Personally, I firmly believe I have come much closer to self-actualization by getting as far away from this kind of toxic, self-defeating mindset as possible. And that's because I firmly believe that this subreddit is more focused on hate and negativity than it is towards self-improvement or social improvement. I was here years ago, recently took a look around because the sub was linked somewhe…
/r/MensRights29/10/17 06:37 PM
1

You wanna point me to whomever said that "all MRAs are -insert insult-"? No one said that. Stop misinterpreting people's statements. I believe this subreddit has a culture of victimhood and blame towards a complete strawman of what feminism is. I believe this sub has members genuinely interested in the betterment of men, but I think they're outshined 10-1 by bitterness and pointless, circlejerky anger.
/r/MensRights29/10/17 05:08 PM
0

He's right tho.
/r/MensRights29/10/17 04:06 PM
0

So...you don't have any way to support your argument? All you have is some weird rant about universities and free speech? Good to know.
/r/MensRights27/10/17 08:53 AM
0

What's wrong, can't support your argument anymore?
/r/MensRights27/10/17 07:42 AM
-5

No, it's definitely because the objective fact that men commit more violent crime than women and are therefore more violent (on average) is hurting your feelings.
/r/MensRights26/10/17 05:31 AM
0

I quoted that study you moron. Not in this thread. Of course...it's not worth considering that both exist. Also they had the same rate of acceptance lol. 1500 samples isn't "a ridiculously small sample size"
/r/MensRights26/10/17 05:22 AM
1

throws fit Er...okay sure whatever helps you sleep lol. You really should watch that video though, it will help.
/r/MensRights25/10/17 01:03 PM
1

Okay if you're going to be dismissive, at least use memes that aren't drastically out of date. And while you're at it, stop bitching in an echo chamber about people you never talk to or interact with.
/r/MensRights25/10/17 12:54 PM
0

Do you have any evidence of the concept? Yep. Go look.
/r/MensRights25/10/17 09:00 AM
1

When will you read past the first sentence? It links to studies. http://ftp.iza.org/dp7300.pdf Feel free to read through the entire thing and explain, in detail, why it's wrong.
/r/MensRights25/10/17 08:59 AM
0

Seriously dude...watch this video Then improve your life.
/r/MensRights25/10/17 08:46 AM
2

No, the upvotes are.
/r/MensRights24/07/16 02:16 PM
3

The top post on the subreddit right now is about Milo.
/r/MensRights24/07/16 08:57 AM
-2

Agreed, but none the less /u/Lethn sounds like he doesn't know what he's talking about by suggesting that the Christian right is irrelevant when they still have an absurd level of political power all over the world. I'm not even american, I'm Australian. Despite Australia having the largest percentage of homosexuals for 20 years we still don't have marriage equality because of Christian fundamentalists. To me, anyone who thinks the right wing Christians are irrelevant is extremely ignorant.
/r/MensRights24/07/16 12:59 AM
59

Mrs Bryant is a fucking legend.
/r/MensRights23/07/16 11:56 PM
2

What?
/r/MensRights23/07/16 08:56 PM
1

Ladies room is nicer anyway You don't know shit.
/r/MensRights23/07/16 08:55 PM
1

No, it doesn't.
/r/MensRights23/07/16 08:49 PM
6

Mate I'm not even in disagreement. Don't pull that silly full-stop sentence bullshit. Sounds to me like you follow him more than 99% of the population.
/r/MensRights23/07/16 08:42 PM
3

Why the fuck would they? This subreddit gets furious when a specific man has a problem and feminists jump in and make it about them. This specific woman killed herself because her religious sect was shit. This has absolutely nothing to do with men.
/r/MensRights23/07/16 08:24 PM
4

I don't like the little shit either, but if you're going to voice an opinion on someone the dumbest thing to do is to announce that you don't follow them.
/r/MensRights23/07/16 08:18 PM
2

both male and female faculty pointed out that the men work longer and less likely to leave, both of which are demonstrably true. Source? There's no way in hell I'm ever going to bring this up without bullet proof evidence.
/r/MensRights23/07/16 08:05 PM
-1

irrelevant as the Christian Right You mean the Christian right that still holds unbelievable amounts of political power?
/r/MensRights23/07/16 07:51 PM
7

Might be a good idea to follow him before you have an opinion of him.
/r/MensRights23/07/16 07:48 PM
1

Become the very thing you hate, yeah good idea massive, massive /s
/r/MensRights23/07/16 07:47 PM
2

IT'S STILL ALIVE TO ME DAMMIT
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/16 03:46 AM
1

Yeah that sucks, but it also has absolutely nothing to do with women having a problem with male health PSAs like these. Which your first reaction to was to discuss how feminists are going to have a problem with it despite absolutely no evidence of any feminist doing so.
/r/MensRights31/01/16 04:04 AM
2

Yeah, a tiny little vocal minority. The overwhelming majority of women don't give a shit but why pay attention to them.
/r/MensRights31/01/16 02:43 AM
-21

Huh, an actual mens issue. Unusual for this subreddit
/r/MensRights30/01/16 04:40 PM
-1

No mate, I have at no point said that non veggies can represent veggies or anything of the sort. My point is that you might as well try to have a representative demoncracy. You seem to be advocating an all or nothing approach. If we can't successfully represent society absolutely perfectly with every single possible demographic, culture, interest, medical condition and god knows what else then what's the point. That is reductionist. Making a gender balanced cabinet is the very first step in atte…
/r/MensRights25/01/16 11:50 AM
-1

I am fairly ignorant of the history of USA voting because I'm not american. I'm saying that due to several factors including culture, socialised treatment and populous that one of the two sexes that humans can actually be might just get taken a little more seriously than a fucking dietary choice.
/r/MensRights25/01/16 11:07 AM
0

I can't speak for your country, but I know for a fact that in mine there wasn't a single registered female voter until voting became legal for women. I'm honestly not going to debate the issue of why women are considered a class of people while vegetarians aren't because I find it to be the most retardedly asinine rhetoric that it doesn't merit a response. Sorry.
/r/MensRights25/01/16 10:17 AM
-4

Yeah, men loved representing women's interests by refusing to let them vote or own property.
/r/MensRights25/01/16 09:48 AM
-4

Go look yourself
/r/MensRights25/01/16 08:27 AM
-4

In that abstract scenario yes, but that wouldn't happen because the country is, in fact, filled with a lot of women who regularly run for office.
/r/MensRights25/01/16 06:31 AM
-2

Wait you thought cabinet ministers were picked by merit? No, they've never been picked by merit, although it's also had fuck all to do with genitals. It's always been about who you know and who you can manipulate. That's why Trudeau's predecessor had a minister for health who wasn't even a fucking doctor. It's why his minister for science believed in creationism.
/r/MensRights25/01/16 05:00 AM
-7

Let me answer your question with another question. Have you ever given a shit before now?
/r/MensRights25/01/16 04:43 AM
-6

But here is the real point -- what matters is not that the cabinet be representative but that it be as capable as possible. No see, that is incorrect It's not your country, you have no idea what you're talking about. Proportional representation is actually the point of Canada's democracy. If you don't think it should be that way then you're allowed to think that, but it is designed to be that way. It's designed to be that way because history is full of examples that show us that people only repr…
/r/MensRights25/01/16 04:06 AM
-6

No, generally the logic only applies to actual cultures as opposed to literally every way you can classify people. You don't need a proportional representation of people who like leather shoes in parliament, but you do need proportional representation of, say, Sikhs in parliament.
/r/MensRights25/01/16 03:00 AM
-4

It's funny, neither am I. I just understand the Canadian government because it's very similar to Australia.
/r/MensRights25/01/16 02:58 AM
-8

Exactly. His bullshit response to why the gender balanced cabinet was so important to him (CURRENT YEAR) pissed me off because the correct answer is: We have a representative democracy. Parliament should represent the people. Half the people are women.
/r/MensRights25/01/16 02:28 AM
2

pew research center are generally pretty shit
/r/MensRights25/01/16 01:41 AM
1

I thought Jonathan McIntosh ran the twitter?
/r/MensRights25/01/16 01:39 AM
-3

What part doesn't make sense? Is 'cabinet' not the term for the parliament in Canada? it is in Australia so I just used it. Apologies if I'm wrong.
/r/MensRights24/01/16 11:56 PM
-14

His feminism stance irks me, but his cabinet is more qualified than any of the previous ones. Not to mention that Canada has a representative democracy, so the most important thing is that the demographics of cabinet match the demographics of society. Lol of course this wasn't well received. Guys, go look at Trudeau's ministers and compare them to Harper's and tell me they aren't universally better. The guy might be a smug twat but he picked good ministers.
/r/MensRights24/01/16 09:56 PM
2

"occasionally"
/r/MensRights16/01/16 01:24 PM
3

Disregarding all narratives, this doesn't sit right with me. Whether or not you think men can be victims of domestic violence (they can, obviously) this video doesn't feel right. It seems edited, dramatized and convenient that he accidentally made it public (which doesn't make sense).
/r/MensRights16/01/16 01:22 PM
1

Well it currently has 2 million views with an overwhelmingly positive response to it. Ironically Matt seems to be the more "feminine" person in this breakup. His demenour is far more sensitive than Nicole's. I gotta be honest, I'm not sure how I feel about a personal matter between two people going public at this level, even if Nicole did abuse him (which is only hearsay at this point anyway).
/r/MensRights16/01/16 01:21 PM
1

Because the entire article is based off the comments of a headmaster at a girls only school. There are plenty of articles discussing the other side
/r/MensRights06/01/16 02:12 AM
1

Don't suppose it has anything to do with her salary? Teachers don't usually earn much and bail is usually based on income
/r/MensRights06/01/16 02:10 AM
1

What message does it send to the boys who look at him as an idol Presumably the parents would explain exactly what I'm trying to, the situation he propositioned her in was inappropriate. There are plenty of times to ask someone out and live TV isn't one of them
/r/MensRights06/01/16 12:47 AM
0

Look mate I agree that the coverage over this issue is completely overblown and Mel (the journalist) seems to agree, she says she wants everyone to move on. With that said it's virtually impossible for her to shut the guy down on live television without seeming unprofessional, this is the main reason (in my opinion) that it's a bad idea to hit on women on live TV such as this. If said women is not attracted to you, she'll have a seriously tough time turning you down.
/r/MensRights05/01/16 03:38 PM
1

A man wrote that article
/r/MensRights05/01/16 03:07 PM
2

Yeah. Unprofessional but not worth the media circus. The journo says she just wanted everyone to move on
/r/MensRights05/01/16 03:05 PM
1

I mean...this guy might not be her type. Women aren't obliged to find any given man attractive
/r/MensRights05/01/16 03:04 PM
12

Last paragraph specifies its for women only
/r/MensRights05/01/16 03:02 PM
1

Story said two women approached him, doesn't specify who complained. Using my logic brain I assumed a woman complained to staff.
/r/MensRights20/12/15 01:42 PM
1

How do you know, exactly?
/r/MensRights20/12/15 09:27 AM
1

Moderates are too boring for outsiders, they'll only focus on the worst because that's catchier and easier to sell. It's shit.
/r/MensRights20/12/15 02:02 AM
1

Na, he had to stick up for his rights because he was being triggered by being asked to leave. I can think of thousands of situations where 'no men allowed' would be completely unfair and sexist but a shelter for women who have been raped and abused by men for god knows how long isn't one of them. There's a men's shelter in my city that has the exact same policy in reverse and I've never heard anyone complain.
/r/MensRights20/12/15 02:00 AM
1

You know I'm actually inclined to say that someone who's seeking shelter from an abusive ex should have their feelings prioritised over some random waiting in the lobby.
/r/MensRights20/12/15 01:45 AM
-1

Get accused by dozens of women and have their stories corroborated then your empathy for the alleged rapist will make sense. Unless you actually did rape someone and that's why your empathy goes to the accused by default.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 09:50 PM
1

Usually, not always
/r/MensRights15/12/15 09:42 PM
-1

Yeah I don't believe that at all. This sub is filled with people who have been falsely accused and have had bad experiences with women. Mark my words, if Cosby is found guilty this sub will stop having posts made about him
/r/MensRights15/12/15 09:40 PM
-3

I'm not, I'm only talking about /r/mensrights as evidenced by my comment: The only posts we will see in this sub will be defending his innocence.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 03:38 PM
-3

Oh definitely, /r/mensrights is notorious for attacking people who have been found not guilty for sexual assault. /s in case you needed it
/r/MensRights15/12/15 03:25 PM
-1

Such as what, exactly? A video? Forensic evidence? Witnesses? No, none of those things would exist in such a scenario.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 03:21 PM
-1

That'll happen when you're arguing with multiple people at 2am while tipsy. You're still an asshole /u/dungone
/r/MensRights15/12/15 03:21 PM
-1

Ah shit, sorry dude.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 03:15 PM
-2

This will be my last response to you. My problem was with your comment "You snooze you lose" in regard to alleged rape victims. I know they have no legal ground to stand on, my problem is not with that. My problem is your callous disregard for their pain. You have repeatedly attempted to derail and I have repeatedly attempted to bring the discussion back to it's roots.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 03:06 PM
0

They're also opening themselves up to unlimited to support. You know damn well how society reacts to female victims of sexual crimes. 'Society' is made up of millions of individuals who all have their own stories. One of my best friends was turned away by police when she reported a rape because there was alcohol involved, for one example. Victims get inundated with all kinds of responses and you're naive to think the overwhelming majority is either for or against them. Absolute shitloads of peop…
/r/MensRights15/12/15 03:01 PM
-2

Jesus dude are you actually mentally retarded? I have never argued that the statute of limitations doesn't exist. My problem is your attitude, not the law.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 02:58 PM
-3

I stopped caring about fallacies when you expressed your opinion the way you did. I was typing out a response, but stopped caring about changing your mind as well. You may be technically correct on the statute of limitations (which I never, at any point, disputed) but your attitude surrounding said law is callous, apathetic and ignorant.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 02:43 PM
-7

I know what the statute of limitations is. I also know that your callous attitude towards alleged rape victims is shit. I don't care if it was never proven in a court of law, the idea that someone could potentially tell you they were raped decades ago and you would respond with "Well who gives a shit" is bullshit. By the way, he admitted to a few claims http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2015/07/07/bill-cosby-admitted-to-drugging-women-to-have-sex-rape-accusers-say-are/
/r/MensRights15/12/15 02:31 PM
-3

So again, keep in mind how traumatising rape is. Keep in mind that I specified it was a successful entertainment personality. All you have as evidence is the hearsay of a friend and a picture of a bruise on your stomach. A good defense attorney would have that case dealt with in minutes. Oh and again, now your career is fucked.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 02:25 PM
-5

I said it much further down buried beneath downvotes but: If this guy is found guilty I doubt there will be any more posts about him. No one will decry or denounce him. The only posts we will see in this sub will be defending his innocence.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 02:15 PM
-8

This is why people think /r/mensrights is toxic. "You snooze you lose" Yeah that's a nice sentiment towards alleged rape victims.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 02:13 PM
-6

Helps that rape has actually happened and been proven to happen and no one has ever proven UFO's exist. People keep using examples of things that don't actually exist in their argument when suggesting accusations don't equal evidence. People also keep skirting around the acquaintances who corroborate the stories and rumors.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 02:11 PM
-5

Yeah it's easy as piss for us to say that, we're less likely to be raped and more likely to be accused. I am well aware that once prison rape is included it's men who are more likely to be raped but in the general population this is not the case. "hard evidence" will never exist in the majority of rape crimes. Unless a woman goes straight to the police to get a rape kit, testimonial, samples of hair and clothing before even having a goddamn shower there will never be any forensic evidence to con…
/r/MensRights15/12/15 02:08 PM
1

You reckon they float? They probably float.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 01:59 PM
-5

Witches aren't allegedly real. God :P
/r/MensRights15/12/15 01:56 PM
-8

Well for one, the consistency of the accusations. All women have had similar stories, compare that with James Deen's recent accusations which are all over the damn place. The other evidence are the other people in the industry who have corroborated several stories and the dozens of people who have said they have heard these specific rumors for decades. I doubt any of this is enough to satisfy public opinion in this subreddit. I'm sure nothing short of a video of each and every alleged incident w…
/r/MensRights15/12/15 01:56 PM
-2

Rad fems. Better sentence would be 'all men are potential rapists' although this is reddit so people would probably just semantically point out that is technically correct.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 01:52 PM
-6

I get that mate but there is a fundamental difference there that makes the analogy fall short. And you continue to ignore the non victims corroborating.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 01:52 PM
-6

Just like you danced around the part where I said non victims corroborated the story, people in the industry who may suffer from doing so. I appreciate the fact that it's just an analogy but the key difference is that witches don't actually exist. Rape does actually happen. You can't cling to the analogy throughout the debate.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 01:36 PM
-9

Gonna start copypasting my other comment because people keep calling me on this: Also I'm not judging that he's guilty solely on the number of accusers. Factors such as the consistency of the accusations, the corroboration from those around at the time, the lack of benefit and possible fallout from accusing him (especially the black women who've accused the man who's been very instrumental in making black culture mainstream). I agree with your second paragraph. There's no statute of limitations …
/r/MensRights15/12/15 12:33 PM
2

Ah, this might again be a cultural difference. The rape culture theory doesn't exist outside universities down here (at least not in my experience). People still think rapists are a minority.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 12:00 PM
-6

For the fourth time now, the number of accusations is not the only factor in my bias towards his guilt.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 11:58 AM
-3

Today's legal definition of rape hasn't changed much since then, except for the part about 'being made to penetrate' being illegal since then. I know feminists say that anything less than enthusiastic consent is rape but the courts don't think so (yet).
/r/MensRights15/12/15 11:56 AM
1

I can't speak for your country, but the police department runs most of the anti crime campaigns in Australia. Works great for domestic violence, I've seen a few campaigns that equally showed male and female victims. Doesn't work so well for drugs, they're still obsessed with cracking down on addicts but that's a different discussion. It's been great chatting with you by the way.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 11:53 AM
16

The first miniboss of Bioshock is a splicer called "Rose". She's fucking terrifying. Very nimble and sadistically sexual in nature. In prototype the main antagonist is actually a virus but it's first host is a girl named Elizabeth Green. She takes the form of a giant tentacle. Skyrim is magic based and the characters are just skins for code, brawniness irrelevant. I think you're onto something with the male characteristics being more inherently threatening but there's more to it. Making a good f…
/r/MensRights15/12/15 11:50 AM
-6

I have none. But does it matter? Considering it's never happened before and assuming he has never raped anyone then there has to be an alternative explanation for such a strange conspiracy. What can we do to encourage victims to go to the police as soon as possible Police departments need good education on how to handle rape victims, for one. For two there needs to be a campaign on the serial nature of rapists, emphasising that if a victim gets to the police as soon as possible they're saving th…
/r/MensRights15/12/15 11:22 AM
-9

You're joking right? It's Bill Cosby dude. If one of the most famous and successful people in the entertainment industry punched you in the stomach and no one saw it happen (and lets assume you're an aspiring actor), what would you do? If the answer is go to the police, they'd probably not believe you. If they did believe you, they'd ask for evidence which you don't have. If it did make it to court, you'd be up against a team of super lawyers paid for by the individual's agency because they don'…
/r/MensRights15/12/15 10:55 AM
-10

No, I want an explanation as to why 50 women all accused the same man of the same thing. Not an explanation for why women lie about rape in general, I've already spent god knows how many nights trying to figure that out. Also I'm not judging that he's guilty solely on the number of accusers. Factors such as the consistency of the accusations, the corroboration from those around at the time, the lack of benefit and possible fallout from accusing him (especially the black women who've accused the …
/r/MensRights15/12/15 10:45 AM
11

There are more male enemies yes, but I've faced female enemies all the time in games. Bioshock series, Prototype, The Elder Scrolls... List goes on.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 10:36 AM
4

he had some star power value. Really? He was on the board for sex workers rights. He had loads of shares in Kink.com and was one of their leading producers/directors/actors. Deen is easily one of the most successful people in the porn industry.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 10:27 AM
-19

Well he's gonna get away with it, no doubt. It's virtually impossible to prove rape beyond reasonable doubt unless the victim behaves in a frankly inhuman way (which sometimes happens, but not in this case) Unless the victim doesn't shower after the rape, marches straight down to the police station, makes a statement, gets a rape kit done (which is another invasive procedure), has photos and samples taken, there will be absolutely no forensic evidence within a week. A rape victim is alive and as…
/r/MensRights15/12/15 10:22 AM
-27

Look dude I'm one of the first people to remind others of innocent until proven guilty (especially as I've dealt with a false allegation). 50 fucking women have accused one of the most successful men in USA with little to nothing to gain from it. If it was 10 women I'd be neutral. If they were all ex girlfriends I'd be neutral. 50 women, some who barely knew him, are all saying he drugged and raped them. Many more have known rumors about this for decades. The idea that 50 women are all lying/con…
/r/MensRights15/12/15 09:09 AM
-36

Christ, fuck this guy. It's people like him who fuel the idea that all men are rapists.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 08:37 AM
2

Dude thank you!
/r/MensRights19/10/15 11:52 AM
1

Any info about the twitter post? Handle? Name?
/r/MensRights19/10/15 05:44 AM
2

Based on the comments in this thread I think most people are more concerned with her being a feminist.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 03:38 AM
15

Wait...what the fuck are you on about? She actually straight up said "I think there's some truth to it, there are more funny men than funny women" Then she laughed at the joke about women not shutting up. If you don't like her you're gonna need to show me a clip that shows her in a bad light.
/r/MensRights15/10/15 05:57 AM
-8

Flawlessly? Dude seemed more triggered than any of the women in the video.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/09/15 03:34 AM
0

Yeah I get your point, she's not held to the exact same dress standards as men. My point is, when the difference is something as irrelevant as a tie, who gives a fuck?
/r/MensRights22/09/15 12:38 PM
-1

Oh god a tie! How could I have forgotten a tie? It's literally like a chokehold necklace around my neck crushing me everyday. Who gives a fuck? If your tie bothers you, learn to tie it properly.
/r/MensRights22/09/15 12:28 PM
6

I wasn't there, you might be right. She might also be pissed because she felt you made it a competition, just to be devil's advocate.
/r/MensRights22/09/15 09:06 AM
0

Having short hair is literally the only thing that fits that stereotype. It's politics, she has to wear a suit.
/r/MensRights22/09/15 06:58 AM
0

So...what exactly was the point of your comment in the first place?
/r/MensRights15/07/15 10:31 PM
1

Spit the dummy? Goddamn dude, how sad is your life that you have to feel superior by behaving like this?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/15 11:26 PM
1

Funny, I'm pretty sure if I asked a similar question you'd ask me to painstakingly explain every nuance behind it and then pick apart even the slightest mistake instead of paying attention to my message. Fuck yourself mate. You aren't interested in having a discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/15 05:31 AM
1

You need me to spoonfeed you every piece of reasoning? You said women have all the power because of the cops. The cops aren't there 99% of the time so your argument doesn't make any sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/15 04:53 AM
1

When the cops show up, the female is assumed to be the victim. Correct. That is why they have all of the power. The cops aren't there 99% of the time mate.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/15 01:29 AM
1

Well I mean...the abuser in any DV scenario is the one with the power. Kinda by definition.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/15 12:57 AM
2

If you are a woman in a DV situation, you have all of the power You're gonna need to clarify this.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/15 12:03 AM
1

Well...it's China. Shock horror, they aren't enlightened
/r/MensRights17/06/15 03:37 AM
1

Here is the main study from 2009 and some relevant articles that help explain them, though you may like to read them entirely yourself. Study: http://www.consad.com/content/reports/Gender%20Wage%20Gap%20Final%20Report.pdf Articles: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/christina-hoff-sommers/wage-gap_b_2073804.html http://time.com/3222543/5-feminist-myths-that-will-not-die/
/r/MensRights02/06/15 08:15 AM
2

I'm currently at work, I'll do some study digging when I get home. I like you, you've got the right approach. This is a very difficult thing to fix and it's a huge mix of grey areas.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 06:40 AM
1

Which career to go with, how much you're willing to negotiate on salary, how much overtime you're willing to do etc. I'm surprised this is the first you're hearing of it, this gets brought up every single time the wage gap is mentioned on the entire website (outside feminists subreddits)
/r/MensRights02/06/15 06:19 AM
1

Back to the stat discussion, the stats you linked are simplistic. All it tells us is that women are earning less than men, it doesn't have any info on why Because most of those studies you implied were bullshit are trying to understand why women are earning less even though it's illegal to pay them less for the same work. All of them come to the conclusion that at least 20% of that gap is due to personal choices.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 05:37 AM
1

Sorry about that, I swear a lot in real life so I generally type the same way I talk. That wasn't an angry swear, honest
/r/MensRights02/06/15 05:12 AM
2

Yes, link the study. It will get torn to fucking pieces as usual.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 04:25 AM
4

Good, it'll suck people in to the article and they'll read about the 94.8% figure.
/r/MensRights01/06/15 04:21 AM
1

Would you give a shit if the roles were reversed?
/r/MensRights27/05/15 06:21 AM
0

a few women too.
/r/MensRights27/05/15 06:17 AM
1

This is a scientific discussion...the fuck does this have to do with men's rights?
/r/MensRights27/05/15 06:16 AM
-7

For the life of me I don't understand why any of the people involved in the gaming consumer revolt want to be associated with the hashtag #gamergate It is so heavily associated with misogyny (a completely separate issue) that it would be a lot smarter and more effective to just rebrand and continue fighting the good fight.
/r/MensRights27/05/15 02:47 AM
5

followed by common reasons that false accusations are made. Good. MRAs don't need convincing that they exist but a lot of normal people (pardon the terminology) and feminists don't actually believe they're a real problem. His utterly neutral tone and explanation behind false accusations is a brilliant move.
/r/MensRights27/05/15 12:48 AM
2

His name is Joe Hildebrand and I still don't understand how he worked his way into the public eye. He's unintelligent, not creative, not funny and not attractive.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 05:10 AM
1

Well...I want to flay them.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 05:09 AM
1

Glad to see this. The interview would have gone very differently with a stronger man with some authority.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 04:17 AM
1

Including when they're showing literally an inch of cleavage.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 02:34 AM
-1

Dude, it's okay to be critical of the movement you identify with. There are some serious assholes who lurk around here. There are comments that OBVIOUSLY are negatively directed towards women. Ignoring them doesn't help us.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 02:31 AM
1

Julia Baird really likes to stir the pot. Probably thinks this line of reasoning is one of those "obvious things that isn't said enough" when in reality she's just reducing a complex discussion to overly simplistic slogans for clicks.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 02:25 AM
-2

You're the first person to mention thinking women are inferior. Are you honestly telling me that all the shit that's said about women here has no reflection of the possibility that there are some actual misogynists here? Because that seems desperately naive to me.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 11:49 PM
-6

It's pretty obviously both, but it comes across as a mere distaste for women a lot of the time. Hell it's not like it's a mortal sin to be disillusioned to women after a lifetime of negative experiences, but let's call it what it is.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 11:17 PM
-5

These comments are why I keep coming back to this sub, its a healthy balance to the (apparent) distaste for women.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 10:50 PM
1

Yeah this doesn't look bad at all
/r/MensRights15/05/15 07:56 AM
2

Never go full thunderf00t
/r/MensRights15/05/15 06:52 AM
2

Enjoy: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l4WBx5SBOos
/r/MensRights15/05/15 06:52 AM
0

...ok
/r/MensRights12/05/15 01:55 PM
2

Perhaps it isn't entirely relevant to this thread and I just have it on my mind. I considered myself a feminist until the insanity took over. I get that portions of the movement have hated men since the 60s but I knew a few good people who wanted gender equality under the banner of feminism. It was quite upsetting to me to see a movement I had such respect for get overshadowed by these angry women with an axe to grind. I'm seeing it happen to mensrights. What's worse is that I'm seeing more impa…
/r/MensRights12/05/15 10:03 AM
1

Not just to discredit then but also to paint an example of consequences to people who fuck up so people will put more forethought in before accusing people of misdeeds. Oh bullshit. This is textbook eye-for-an-eye and it will accomplish nothing.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 06:47 AM
-4

I dunno man it just seems odd that you'd use her apology as an excuse to sue her. I mean...that's blatantly discouraging apologising. Which last I checked is a good thing. Plus I don't think people stop and think very much before saying inflammatory shit on social media so making an example of her probably wouldn't do anything.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 04:35 AM
0

I agree she should monetarily compensate him, but I'm seeing people suggest jailtime which is ridiculous.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 04:30 AM
1

I feel like we really, REALLY need to be more critical of the angry MRAs. I'm seeing far too much hypocrisy in this subreddit and I've seen a few comments saying the same thing but they're few and far between. This is not supposed to be an emotional support subreddit or a circlejerk. Feminism loves to say it's about equality and behave like anything but, I do not want the same for the Men's Rights movement.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 04:28 AM
-6

And how does punishing her fix what has already happened to him? No, it's just putting more people through shit because of an ideological approach to the law instead of a pragmatic one.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 04:13 AM
-2

I might be idealistic here, but I'd like to make society better with as little shaming and social execution as possible.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 03:58 AM
1

Because he just wants it to be over with. I wouldn't go through months of legal bullshit over this, further putting my name in the spotlight.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 03:50 AM
4

The top comment currently has an argument and the upvoted comments are MRAs calling to have her name released so they can attack her. Assholes jump to social media to lynch, regardless of ideology.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 03:49 AM
-4

You know her family will get shit as well right? Fuck this mob mentality. She has kids, those kids don't need a bunch of internet strangers harassing their mother.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 03:48 AM
-5

So you don't want them to apologise when they fuck up?
/r/MensRights12/05/15 01:18 AM
5

Man that is a really nice graph. You don't see really nice graphs as much these days.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 11:35 PM
-1

They're generally bullshit, so no.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 09:42 AM
-5

It isn't, and the story is probably made up. Feminists, crazy as they might be, don't just randomly walk up to people in cafes and start talking feminism. Also she never even told them she was trans and somehow they telepathically knew and started bullying her over that
/r/MensRights06/05/15 07:44 AM
-6

I know what his point was. His point was totally irrelevant to the discussion.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 11:54 AM
0

I understand that. Now can we agree that it's really shitty for the rape victim? That's literally all I'm saying.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 08:07 AM
-3

Careful, you might impede on some of the professional victims in this sub
/r/MensRights05/05/15 07:37 AM
0

Talked about here. There are plenty of stories where women have desperately tried and failed to convict their rapist to no avail as well. It depends on the state
/r/MensRights05/05/15 07:35 AM
-2

Oh goddamn seriously? I'm trying to show that a false rape accusation is just as bad as rape in terms of the legal process
/r/MensRights05/05/15 07:22 AM
3

Ha! That's entry level shit for Puppetry of the Penis
/r/MensRights05/05/15 06:46 AM
-8

The thought that he actually has to fight hard to win it is blood boiling just for the record this is exactly how feminists feel when a woman who actually has been raped has to fight tooth and nail to win. Really does show how similar the whole ordeal is
/r/MensRights05/05/15 06:43 AM
4

That's my favorite part about this subreddit. You can say that the entire movement is a bag of shit and you'll get downvoted, but you'll never get banned. I got banned from /r/feminism recently and I still don't know why because the mods won't even bother to respond to my messages.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 06:41 AM
-7

Dude what? It's pretty fucking obvious why being gay isn't considered a mental health issue.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 06:34 AM
0

Hey Mike!
/r/MensRights05/05/15 05:35 AM
1

Why would they even bother to interview him if that was the case?
/r/MensRights01/05/15 07:55 AM
1

In fact, one of the main points of this subreddit is... I'm sorry how is this subreddit's goals relevant to a discussion about the current state of gender disparity? Not trying to be rude, but what this subs goals are and what reality is will not be the same for a very long time
/r/MensRights01/05/15 04:56 AM
3

I hate ghetto cameramen
/r/MensRights01/05/15 04:45 AM
1

Without an audio recording of the conversation no one here will have enough context to give you good advice. Who knows man. Maybe she was nervous, new interviewers get just as nervous as interviewees.
/r/MensRights01/05/15 04:41 AM
3

You're thinking of the Occulus Rift conference. The man answering the question was John Carmack.
/r/MensRights01/05/15 04:33 AM
1

In the context of the thread the guy you responded to was talking to someone who said they had absolutely no sympathy for people getting their private nude pictures posted online so...
/r/MensRights28/04/15 12:22 AM
1

Just because someone should be aware that the possibility exists doesn't mean the person who carries it out can do so without punishment. You took that and said: God forbid a potential victim is expected to take some personal responsibility. How am I supposed to read that any way other than you want to focus on the victim of an attack than the perpetrator?
/r/MensRights27/04/15 11:59 PM
1

What the fuck? Are you suggesting we don't punish the people actually committing the crime?
/r/MensRights27/04/15 10:58 PM
0

That place is a shit hole. The guy I was talking to was on the opposite side of the horseshoe.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 11:37 AM
0

You're descended from slave owners you fucking moron. Also less than 10% of the country is descended from convicts, I'm not. Enjoy never getting any pussy.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 03:36 AM
2

You need to shut up and or leave the subreddit. You are a dictionary defined misogynist who is delusional, who thinks women are out to get him Leave.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 03:17 AM
4

Of course not. This is rape - period. No, it fucking isn't, because this is not the only case of coerced sex that has ever happened. If this was legally considered rape it would set a precedent that would fuck over so many men who weren't given clear signals that the woman wasn't into it. He can say no, if he cared enough he would. I understand why you're pissed off but you can't view stuff like this in a vacuum, you have to look at the broader implications of calling something rape.
/r/MensRights01/04/15 03:00 AM
8

No one is fucking kidding you, that is how sexual assault works. If you consent, you've given consent. The amount of legal ramifications if we considered consent given while not wanting to have sex would be horrific (especially for men).
/r/MensRights31/03/15 10:27 PM
2

Nowhere, we have a sense of humour down here
/r/MensRights27/03/15 06:41 AM
11

As evidenced by the live audience loudly applauding Whoopi at every chance they get?
/r/MensRights27/03/15 06:34 AM
3

Poor girl. Had to go through a rape kit for no reason and then got picked on cus her dads a cunt
/r/MensRights27/03/15 06:24 AM
-3

The downvotes pretty much prove your point
/r/MensRights27/03/15 01:37 AM
1

I didn't deny the existence of false rape accusations you monumental pussy, I denied that this instance was realistic.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 10:15 PM
1

Our country is only 114 years old mate, our culture is still forming. Not a problem for me if it becomes more asian given that we're in Asia.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 10:13 PM
0

As a follow up, for seriousness. If you all care about proving me wrong, you don't have to do any research. I have to spend hours finding various material that is peer reviewed and bulletproof, and freely available. Even then you might not change your mind. If you actually want to understand the scenario more than proving me wrong, you'll do the research yourself.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 12:36 PM
1

Oh the Cronulla riots? Yeah that was 11 years ago. Although as time went by more and more people started to release videos and tell stories of just how insulting and provocative all the white folk had been while the gathering was still a (albeit very emotional) protest, not a riot. Basically it was just a bunch of angry assholes who'd been in the sun for days, drinking beer to hydrate, all standing around a bunch of like-minded assholes just circlejerking each other's prejudice. Those assholes (…
/r/MensRights10/03/15 12:17 PM
3

Ok that was pretty good. But seriously it's not so bad down here with the feminist stuff. I mean, it's a little strong, but our culture wasn't exactly pretty before feminism by comparison with USA (no one likes to admit that). It's a huuuge country, if the feminism bothers you that much it's pretty easy to just go to the middle of the outback and chill with some friendly old cunt who didn't even hear about the middle east wars. I guess I just don't like my country generalised, and I'm not as use…
/r/MensRights10/03/15 11:42 AM
2

I said asking for evidence is fucking stupid, This is why people think you're not worth listening to.
/r/PussyPass10/03/15 04:32 AM
2

Really desperate for an argument huh? Also I'm not a feminist...you're an idiot.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 02:03 AM
1

I definitely don't have the will to debate this, you're clearly not trying to understand my point, you're just trying to disprove it. You win, congratulations
/r/MensRights10/03/15 01:22 AM
2

I live down here, you won't get put in jail for looking at a girl. Get over yourself and chill with us at the beach
/r/MensRights10/03/15 01:19 AM
2

Schools generally try to protect honor students because they're good for statistics (look how high our scores are!) Also they illegally threw him out Also his parents didn't, for a moment, take his side
/r/MensRights09/03/15 10:51 PM
4

I noticed that and I'm sure it contributes to most of it, but I maintain that what they did was very illegal and as such it's surprising none of the administrators told their coworkers to slow down unless they want to be sued.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 04:32 AM
15

I don't think a detail that will totally change my opinion of the situation has been omitted, but something has to be missing here. This story is so, sooo improbable and illegal on the part of the school that something doesn't seem right. True though, I'm gonna err on caution
/r/MensRights09/03/15 02:12 AM
1

It's pretty annoying and rude to move through public transport as if you're the only one there. People shouldn't have to ask you to make room for them if you're taking up lots of space or in the way somehow. That said, it's not a gendered issue and it shits me to tears when I hear complaints about gender neutral behavior as if it's only one sides problem.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 01:46 AM
1

It surprises me how often you hear about celebrities using the subway. Sure it isn't subject to traffic, but it's still kinda weird/cool that so many of them prefer the subway.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 01:44 AM
1

While it's not a stupid thing to do, you're the one trawling tinder for stranger to meet then condescendingly blaming them all for being dangerous people. I agree with everything else but I'm not sure how she's supposed to be wary of strangers without taking precautions against bad strangers
/r/MensRights09/03/15 01:20 AM
59

Something doesn't add up in this story.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 01:04 AM
0

This sub is the perfect example of the horse shoe theory 90% of the time
/r/MensRights02/03/15 01:49 AM
1

I believe he meant feminists when he said enemies.
/r/MensRights28/02/15 11:32 PM
0

This kind of criticism makes complete sense when applied to the general media. Less so when you're talking about the mens rights subreddit.
/r/MensRights27/02/15 03:41 PM
14

I watched the video several times to find the part where they said all men were oppressive but couldn't find it. The video shows women loading their weapons right next to men doing the same. In this movement, at the very least, we can see women being equal to men in all measures (including the negative ones). I won't deny feminism in 1st world countries has become toxic, but this is not a 1st world country.
/r/MensRights27/02/15 03:33 PM
170

I hope this gets more attention, because this movement needs a higher proportion of positive posts.
/r/MensRights27/02/15 01:32 PM
1

Am I missing something here? I mean yeah it doesn't mention male victims but it doesn't seem to be insinuating that all men are rapists
/r/MensRights22/02/15 10:07 PM
2

Which isn't misogynistic...
/r/MensRights22/02/15 09:52 PM
2

Ffs we all know the answer to this, why do questions like this keep clogging up the sub?
/r/MensRights17/02/15 02:10 AM
-1

Especially in this sub EDIT: See?
/r/MensRights17/02/15 01:56 AM
1

Christ you didn't even read the article did you? Changing the gender of a male character to female, but then keeping everything else exactly the same is not making a female protagonist. There were/are plenty of strong female characters in the Marvel universe that they could easily have developed more and brought into the spotlight. But instead they just made Thor a girl.
/r/MensRights16/02/15 02:55 AM
-2

But they didn't make any female protagonists, they just changed the gender of a male character
/r/MensRights16/02/15 02:34 AM
-1

I said exactly what I said, you're watering down a very complex point to make it seem stupid. I don't think that technically qualifies as a strawman, but either way I'm done here.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 08:38 AM
-4

It feels like you are deliberately ignoring my point: Yes, they are driving dangerously. That's my point. If you have a negligent driver, driving all over the footpath and endangering pedestrians by what insane logic do you think it's a good idea to make it harder for them to see where they're going? The activists took a dangerous situation and made it worse. I respect that the drivers behaviour is shit, I respect that standing on the side of the road and holding signs probably wont stop them. B…
/r/MensRights06/02/15 07:27 AM
-4

I don't get this though, because the video literally shows the drivers ignoring the activists and driving straight back onto the road.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 07:11 AM
-2

And what makes you think they'll stop? We actually saw one guy just stick his head out the window and ignore them. Did I watch a different video?
/r/MensRights06/02/15 07:10 AM
-8

Or, hear me out here: Because they're the kind of people who drive on the sidewalk they don't give a shit if they hurt anyone, so they'll just drive home with reduced visibility Class act by the way, anyone down voting me. I hope none of you get hurt doing stupid shit like this
/r/MensRights06/02/15 06:14 AM
-13

Yeah great...it's really fucking dangerous. Shame them all you want, but you've literally made it harder for a negligent driver to see. I don't feel like you need to be Einstein to see why that's a bad idea
/r/MensRights06/02/15 04:39 AM
-8

Blocking the drivers vision helps....how?
/r/MensRights06/02/15 02:03 AM
4

You need to ask yourself why you think this. If you actually ask a lot of women of all ages, most of them will say they aren't perpetually afraid of rape
/r/MensRights06/02/15 12:33 AM
0

I'm not saying that, but I'm not going to try to explain that anymore. I won't argue with a toddler who can't talk to someone who disagrees with him. You should probably relax, your oppression is showing.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 07:20 AM
0

Yeah, and men are attracted to sleeping with as many woman as physically possible to increase their chance of fertile offspring. As there is no biological response to prevent rape babies, this would (logically) encourage men to fuck women whether or not they're consenting. There are thousands of reasons we don't, one of which being that human social groups have typically shunned those who rape and being shunned would almost certainly lead to death in the jungle/savannah etc. For the last time I …
/r/MensRights05/02/15 06:35 AM
0

Oh come on dude I gave you a fucking explanation as to what I meant, don't twist my fucking words.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 05:58 AM
0

Er...yes it is. If it wasn't I'd be raping every woman I see on the street, it benefits me evolutionarily because I have a much higher chance of healthy fertile offspring. Obviously I'm not doing that because its wrong, but my primal sex drive doesn't know that
/r/MensRights05/02/15 04:59 AM
1

Because sexuality in a modern society is more complex than the most basic sexual drives?
/r/MensRights05/02/15 02:48 AM
10

Kinda amazes me that people needed that clarified
/r/MensRights04/02/15 09:19 PM
1

/r/iamverysmart
/r/MensRights02/02/15 02:35 AM
1

but then I'd just ask why the "right thing" seems invariably to favor the interests of other people and act against my own. The idea is that kids tend to latch on to a male role model in their life just as much as female role models. When you enter the life of a single mother you enter the lives of her children and it's unfair on them for you to just casually browse and then just leave. You have the emotional wisdom to understand that, they don't.
/r/MensRights01/02/15 04:17 PM
1

Dude how hard is it to rotate the fucking image before posting it?
/r/MensRights01/02/15 08:18 AM
1

This literally has nothing to do with mens rights. I loved the gif and the video, but the fact that a girl has a good relationship with her father isn't really relevant to this sub.
/r/MensRights01/02/15 06:09 AM
1

Dude, getting the rape kit done to you is fucking horrible. What is so hard to grasp about that?
/r/MensRights01/02/15 04:29 AM
1

Huh, I don't remember anyone breaking the rape kit out on me and fondling around inside me last time I got robbed. Dude, just look up the fucking process next time and you won't look like an idiot.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 06:17 AM
6

Does anyone have a version without the red pill tweets? I'd like to be able to show people this without them thinking I'm from the 19th century
/r/MensRights30/01/15 04:58 AM
2

Err...we give women a voice here. Why the fuck wouldn't we allow trans men? I mean dude you're as welcome as anyone else, but this question feels very unnecessary bordering on ignorant
/r/MensRights30/01/15 04:51 AM
2

I agree with the premise, but look up the process a rape victim has to go through and it becomes pretty obvious why so few of them bother
/r/MensRights30/01/15 01:13 AM
1

Thanks for sharing the article, because the picture doesn't show any prejudice at all by itself.
/r/MensRights20/01/15 04:55 AM
2

See! That's all I wanted. Thanks man.
/r/MensRights18/01/15 04:30 AM
1

He's working the fucking drive through lane at McDonalds, of course he's having a bad night.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/01/15 02:09 AM
2

Or you know....I just have friends who are women? I'm not even American you fuckwad
/r/MensRights16/01/15 11:38 PM
3

Wow...and this was up voted. Tip for those reading this, don't listen people who say all women are evil and actively trying to ruin their lives. Especially if said person openly says they don't spend any time with women, because they obviously have no idea what they're talking about
/r/MensRights16/01/15 01:52 AM
3

Thank you. I know rhetorical questions are good in a face to face, but it doesn't work so well when every third post is a silly question with an extremely obvious answer, and the answer is always the same.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 06:06 AM
1

I straight up don't believe you. This doesn't make any sense.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 06:01 AM
1

Almost had the exact same thing happen to me. Im happy to hear that it wasn't isolated
/r/MensRights13/01/15 03:17 AM
1

And as I said the analogy falls apart because men and women are not exactly the same, they respond to sexual contact differently
/r/MensRights13/01/15 12:48 AM
1

The stuff he's been saying lately make a lot more sense, but I'm nearly positive he either lied to his girlfriend about his 'rape' because she would dump him or he faked the entire thing for publicity. So...no, he's not totally sane. Then again, technically, neither am I (mental illness is kinda common).
/r/MensRights12/01/15 12:24 PM
2

Ok we need a reality check here. The number of people claiming this is pedophilic is absolutely nothing compared to the number of people who've come out and said that's ridiculous. Look at the youtube comments, for once they're actually good! Yeah, some crazy people obsessed over pedophilia but it doesn't seem that the rest of the world agrees.
/r/MensRights12/01/15 12:23 PM
1

I've been seeing this bot everywhere lately, is something wrong with the admin's bot?
/r/MensRights12/01/15 12:21 PM
3

I haven't been to this sub in a while but where did all these victim complex posts come from? The dude didn't feel sexually harassed, therefore he wasn't sexually harassed. Yes, everyone is aware that if the genders were reversed it would be different. That may have something to do with the fact that men and women are not exactly the same and respond to sexual contact differently (shocker)
/r/MensRights12/01/15 02:55 AM
2

...after they sleep together. Not before
/r/MensRights12/01/15 02:32 AM
1

There doesn't need to be a specific term for anyone who's not an idiot.
/r/MensRights12/01/15 02:24 AM
1

No worries man, sorry it happened
/r/MensRights12/01/15 01:31 AM
1

There'd better be more to that story, because having a falling out with a family member because they have different political views to you is kinda pathetic
/r/MensRights11/01/15 10:36 PM
0

This episode is 12 years old, try to stay current mate
/r/MensRights11/01/15 12:56 AM
0

I'm very familiar with his work and I'd say he's about 20% less aggressive now
/r/PussyPassDenied29/12/14 11:34 PM
-6

And then the camera man laughed at her saying this was going on YouTube and that was when she totally lost it. I don't know what video you were watching to not see that.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/12/14 02:11 AM
-8

There was a police officer 3 metres away. No need for a camera to prove that she was nuts.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/12/14 03:33 PM
2

He didn't do it as much in the past.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/12/14 03:07 PM
7

Meh, that's some random definition someone came up with to try and quantify something going viral on the internet. Still though, I didn't know that.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/12/14 01:10 PM
-6

I feel really sorry for him that he had the poor luck to end up dealing with a snarky little shit who loved getting an obviously mentally ill person all riled up. Look this video was as fun to watch as the next one, it's always fun watching obvious disturbances be dealt with by cops. But all of this would have gone so much smoother if the kid filming just put the fucking camera down when it was obviously making the cop's job harder.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/12/14 12:50 PM
1

Dude, that's the problem. You are not misogynistic, there is a minority around you that is. Every time anyone suggests that they are downvoted and ridiculed. It's a damn shame because it holds the movement back, considering how much scrutiny it comes under.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 12:59 PM
-1

Yeah, it's basically exactly the same as how feminists continually deny any misandry amongst them. Guys the cause is good, but don't fool yourself into thinking there isnt an unsettlingly high minority of misogynistic fuckwits who use mensrights as a mask for their douchebaggery.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 08:24 AM
5

hyperbole is a valid argument tactic when it is clear that is what it is. Says who? If it doesn't convince the person you're arguing against that they're wrong then it's not a good tactic to use.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 08:21 AM
1

As in it has a higher absolute number of people in prison but not the highest number of people in prison as a ratio against the population?
/r/MensRights15/12/14 06:21 AM
0

Makes sense to me
/r/MensRights14/12/14 09:44 PM
1

I had it sorted by best
/r/MensRights14/12/14 08:37 PM
-23

It's honestly a little depressing that the top comment is someone griping about how men are treated worse than women instead of this one.
/r/MensRights14/12/14 01:02 PM
-3

Deliberately shocking is weird.
/r/PussyPass08/12/14 10:27 PM
8

Too rational an explanation, needs more oppression.
/r/MensRights07/12/14 03:10 PM
-3

Oh no totally, it's not even slightly weird that a guy is walking around in an all-white outfit with a big red stain on his crotch.
/r/PussyPass06/12/14 03:48 AM
2

Hm... I may potentially reconsider my point of view.
/r/MensRights05/12/14 10:14 AM
2

The problem with that is some of them aren't victims once you find out how much they provoked their own assault
/r/MensRights05/12/14 05:21 AM
2

Err...the psychopathy factor is measurably incredibly rare
/r/MensRights05/12/14 05:20 AM
0

Since when do campuses have to adhere to free speech? Isn't that government only?
/r/MensRights05/12/14 02:13 AM
2

There isn't unequal power here though. He could have thrown her off at any moment.
/r/TheRedPill03/12/14 01:03 PM
2

I know this thread is a little old, but it was a wonderfully civil read.
/r/MensRights03/12/14 11:45 AM
-9

Well that was irritating to watch. Here's a sequence of events. Guy with pretty weird protest standing Girl comes up and berates him for no reason One of the men pretty obviously grabbed her wrist as she tried to walk away She overreacts and punches him They follow her, harassing her, for about two minutes. Everything and everyone in this video is so, so stupid.
/r/PussyPass24/11/14 09:49 AM
3

As an Australian, it sounds far more like a west coast slur to me.
/r/MensRights01/11/14 11:42 AM
-7

When one gender has it better than the other gender I prefer for the 'oppressed' gender to get the same benefits as the other. I'm not sure I like pulling women down into the same shithole as men, instead of just pulling men out of the shithole.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/10/14 12:20 PM
322

Yeah this video is gross in several, unique ways.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/10/14 12:15 PM
0

I gotta say there's a lot of hate against this woman and I kind of feel sorry for her. Kelly Brook is an idiot. There isn't a single original thought in her head and no one should be surprised that she's okay with hitting men because it seems like she's been brainwashed to believe that we are so physically superior that even if she wanted to, she couldn't hurt us. If this was a respected actress or female personality I'd be very demoralised but Kelly Brook isn't going to be the person to form he…
/r/MensRights10/09/14 05:04 AM
1

Exactly, that is what he's saying. Do you have a problem with it? I honestly can't tell.
/r/MensRights07/09/14 02:44 AM
4

Wait are you agreeing? It seems like you're really angrily agreeing.
/r/MensRights06/09/14 05:00 PM
15

If it were Mitch Hedberg or a comedian who is just classic funny I'd agree, but Patton tends to weave a message into his comedy, which I usually find to be somewhat nuanced. Which is why the shitty hypocrisy bugs me in this case.
/r/MensRights06/09/14 04:52 PM
1

Well it varies fuck loads depending on who they associate with and where they live but the fact is it's a very recent thing for them to be equal to men. There are people alive who can remember when they weren't allowed to vote. Now all the laws have made the sexes equal but there is a culture thousands of years old that has given women less freedom than men and it doesn't go away in a puff of smoke. The result of the rapid change in laws means that in many ways, men have gotten a shitty end of t…
/r/MensRights20/06/14 06:18 AM
1

That's also something that'd probably vary from jurisdiction.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 01:24 PM
1

What "shit" do women deal with? You'd better change this opinion real fast because it's stupid shit like this that makes everyone think the MRA is a hate group.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 05:22 AM
1

Oh I know, I agree with you. But the argument isn't simply 'they should have autonomy over their own bodies'
/r/MensRights22/03/14 05:51 AM
-2

By the same logic anyone could argue that vaccinations are a horrid thing.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 04:48 AM
11

I just messaged the moderators about him. We can't have people like that here, if anyone comes here from a neutral stance it will totally cloud the real message behind MRA
/r/MensRights22/03/14 04:46 AM
-2

Funny because I kinda agree with the sentiment. If you allow a woman to repeatedly physically abuse you, you're a pussy. Doesn't make her not a cunt, but seriously...you're allowing it to happen.
/r/MensRights21/03/14 03:12 AM
4

Because everyone who's ever met him in real life has said he's a lovely person. The same can't be said for Simon Cowell, although both of them play it up because people love to see an angry, cynical brit talk shit on contestants.
/r/PussyPass21/03/14 01:11 AM
3

There is absolutely no way you would have hit those men 50 years ago because back then no one would have gotten annoyed if they had just slammed you back. You're only content with hitting those men because you know they can't do anything about it.
/r/PussyPass20/03/14 01:34 PM
3

Relevant username, I guess.
/r/PussyPass20/03/14 12:43 PM
-13

That's a little unfair isn't it? Stealing is, in fact, a crime and those men were doing the right thing by stopping him. It also kinda helped that half the time he stuck his arm WAAY out and obviously grabbed the purse where the woman slyly snatched it out of his pocket.
/r/PussyPass20/03/14 12:35 PM
1

You are not in the wrong, stop admitting fault. Dude what exactly do you think he was going to accomplish besides pissing her off? Not saying that what he did was wrong but it was certainly stupid.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 07:51 AM
1

You're equating removing the foreskin to chopping off the clitoris? Dude are you fucking serious? Not only that but it isn't discrimination if a news source doesn't mention the struggles of men EVERY SINGLE TIME they want to discuss the struggles of women. Sometimes they just discuss one side of the issue.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 07:46 AM
1

Look man it's a little (I stress that word little) more complicated than that because the misogyny against Gillard was the first time a prime minister was criticized for their gender that way. It was also sad that people were screaming "ditch the witch" and some even had signs saying "burn the witch". These people probably see this as giving them back a taste of their own medicine. I don't advocate this kind of reasoning but it isn't completely nonsensical. It is also worth noting that our curre…
/r/MensRights20/03/14 07:39 AM
1

No, because people look good. It really is as simple as that. I'm a totally straight man and I can appreciate a beautiful male form the same way I can appreciate a nice piece of furniture. I'm not sure objectification itself is the problem, I think the real problem is people taking it too far/seriously.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 06:09 AM
1

The latter. I try to spend little time around unreasonable people.
/r/MensRights13/03/14 03:24 AM
1

Dude I'm on this website a lot and am subscribed to loads of different subreddits and for every girl taking on criticism and actually considering the argument there are three that do nothing beyond disregard any opinion that remotely opposes them. I don't know why, maybe they're less privy to criticism from men over the internet than women in real life but I'm not basing my judgement that your responses are 'surprising' off a small sample size of data.
/r/MensRights13/03/14 03:21 AM
1

Thanks for the response, you've been surprisingly reasonable in this discussion. And yes, I wanted to make it very clear that it was casual sex because I didn't want anything to go sour and for her to be able to say that I 'used' her.
/r/MensRights13/03/14 03:14 AM
2

If you want to take it past a friendship, you need to learn how to flirt a little Very true words. What isn't brought up nearly enough is that as a young boy that is rarely/never taught. Every mature woman: older sisters, mom, grandma, aunties AND tv shows all taught me (and your average man) that if I treat a woman with respect and be nice to her then she will develop feelings for me. I can't help but think part of the 'nice guy' complex has to do with being mislead about the importance of bein…
/r/MensRights13/03/14 03:07 AM
1

Just for the record, I've had a similar situation happen to me (a man) and it was fucking infuriating that she got extremely upset with me she said "I like you" and I said "Well I'm sorry, I don't like you back" I get that she had feelings and stuff but it was kinda agreed at first that this was casual sex and I didn't owe her anything beyond that. I gotta say your story sounds quite a bit like that because you first said that you brought it up and he bolted, then later said that he had 'promise…
/r/MensRights13/03/14 03:01 AM
1

Honestly, thank you. I'm probably too used to people being unnecessarily polite to the point where your honesty came across as a bit of an attack. I do want to point out that my comments above are addressing the fact that due to the nature of some comments in the sub, the intention of the commenter is misunderstood. Understanding someone's intention vs making your intention clear is a two way street. Again though, thank you for taking the time out to write such a comprehensive explanation. I und…
/r/TheRedPill10/02/14 02:54 AM
1

Well thankyou for that comprehensive albeit venomous reply. It makes a lot more sense now. I also want to commend the fact that despite I'm obviously angering people by asking simple questions I'm still not being downvoted. Haven't seen that before on reddit.
/r/TheRedPill09/02/14 10:53 PM
1

Wait I'm confused now. Why call this sub "The Red Pill", a name that is a reference to a movie where a man becomes enlightened and converted from ignorance, if you don't care about the unconverted? Why make the sub at all? /r/mensrights already exists. Also I'm not unconverted. I wholeheartedly agree with the premise of this subreddit and I honestly think that most people would agree with the sidebar. It's the comments that make it appear that men here honestly would prefer women to be second cl…
/r/TheRedPill09/02/14 12:38 PM
1

As a man who's just started lurking this subreddit, I feel like it's a bit mixed. I think there are a lot of interesting points raised and discussed here but from time to time I will see a fairly embarrassing misogynistic comment upvoted quite a bit and it's a little disheartening. In the eyes of the unconverted (who I assume is who you're trying to reach) it devalues your credibility.
/r/TheRedPill09/02/14 12:14 PM
8

I don't think there is a single man in the world who, after finding out that his wife was raped by 4 men, would be more interested in telling her about his meeting at work and then go off at her for complaining about the patriarchy.
/r/TheRedPill09/02/14 12:05 PM
17

That was piss poor arguing on his part. He never mentioned the simple fact that it made sense to spend money on women when women earned less than men, which is no longer the case.
/r/TheRedPill09/02/14 10:46 AM
14

Dude it's so hyperbolic... I've dated you for 6 months, I thought you liked me Nope.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 05:12 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter