| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | A couple get drunk and have sex and wake up the next morning. If the woman regrets or does not remember, what happened the night before, it's called rape. When the roles are switched, it's called child support. WTF?“A couple get drunk” I firmly believe that if both people are intoxicated and they have consensual sex then no rape was committed. However, if one party is sober and the other is heavily intoxicated or incapacitated and they have sex that’s where it seems more rapey. I’ve never understood the sentiment that all drunk sex is rape. Drunk sex can absolutely count as rape but not all the time or even most of the time. | /r/MensRights | 07/06/22 06:31 PM |
| 1 | Over 20 million falsely accusedThank you! If I reported either one of my assaulters they could easily construe it to make me seem at fault and like I wanted it. I met up with a man at night to hangout? It was obvious I wanted to have sex. He is a veteran? He MUST be a good guy. He was high/on drugs? He probably didn’t know what he was doing. He got angry when I resisted? Probably because he was out of his mind. He threatened me? I probably misinterpreted it. He talked about people he tortured and killed? He was probably havin… | /r/MensRights | 02/06/22 12:08 AM |
| 2 | Over 20 million falsely accusedThat makes sense. I think the proof requirements should be fairly high both ways though. I’ve been raped and sexually assaulted before and if I took it to court it would honestly seem like I’m lying because I have such little proof for either. If I went to prison for not being able to prove my rape or sexual assault happened I’d descend into madness tbh. | /r/MensRights | 31/05/22 05:10 PM |
| 2 | Over 20 million falsely accusedI agree with this. My only concern comes in when I consider scenarios where the accuser actually was raped but can’t prove it happened. Would there need to be significant evidence that suggests the accuser is lying? Or would we prosecute them for simply not being able to prove a rape happened? I’ve always wondered about this. | /r/MensRights | 29/05/22 12:32 PM |
| 1 | Spanish parliament approves ‘only yes means yes’ consent bill, which means women can now falsely accuse men of sexual assault without needing to provide evidenceYeah good. I was in a situation like that, which if everything the man confessed to me was true then he was a violent war criminal and pissing him off was only gonna make it worse. (I thought I was gonna die that night). I agree with your sentiment for the most part. | /r/MensRights | 29/05/22 05:09 AM |
| 2 | Spanish parliament approves ‘only yes means yes’ consent bill, which means women can now falsely accuse men of sexual assault without needing to provide evidenceWhat about duress type situations though? In situations where a person reasonably fears for their life/ safety it can still absolutely be rape if they don’t give a no or even say yes | /r/MensRights | 29/05/22 04:58 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter