TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Savipalooza Archive

View 1 posts and 46 comments by Savipalooza on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

QuestionSavipalooza/r/MensRights06/10/14 08:29 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

If a guy asked, would he be using the penis pass?
/r/PussyPassDenied08/10/19 06:50 AM
6

I'd hate to be that guy, but she may not have been trying to use the pussy pass. She could just be a disgusting freak who would have done the same thing if she were a dude. I'm not sure if she expected people not to care simply because she's a woman. Nevertheless, justice was served.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/10/17 06:08 PM
2

I'm surprised no one else noticed this. Both of the women who got punched were just trying to break up the fight. The woman in purple did touch the guy who was being "picked on," but not violently. She even held the other woman back when she tried getting violent with the guy. Then when the guy's friend shows up and won't stop hitting the guy in black--even when he can no longer intelligently defend himself--the two women who try to stop the fight get punched in the face. For all we know, the gu…
/r/PussyPassDenied25/06/16 07:05 AM
8

You could have just opened the image in MS Paint, selected the area around the question and answer, hit copy, then open a new document and hit paste, then save.
/r/MensRights24/06/16 07:58 PM
0

Anecdotes don't give us the big picture. This one woman's success story doesn't undo the unsuccessful reports other women have made. Besides, feminists are not trying to discourage anyone from reporting rape. They're merely complaining about the inaction that often results from reporting it. That doesn't mean they don't want you to report it.
/r/MensRights29/04/16 02:03 PM
1

If the law can't gauge intentions, then why do they differentiate between voluntary and involuntary manslaughter?
/r/MensRights24/04/16 08:45 PM
1

I'll get charged with assault. If it's not done for sexual gratification, then it's not sexual assault. It's just regular assault.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 08:42 PM
-17

You consider a knee to the groin sexual assault? You are very stupid.
/r/MensRights23/04/16 06:27 PM
1

Just because he couldn't think of a better idea doesn't mean he shouldn't criticize an idea he thinks is bad. I may not know how to create world peace, but I know that nuking the entire Middle East is a bad way to achieve that goal.
/r/MensRights16/04/16 10:06 PM
1

He didn't say you shouldn't do anything. He said you shouldn't do one particular thing.
/r/MensRights14/04/16 02:17 PM
-2

He didn't promote appeasement. He didn't promote anything. He just told us what he thinks we shouldn't do, not what we should do. You can't reasonably describe his solution as appeasement if he never offered a solution to begin with.
/r/MensRights12/04/16 07:35 PM
2

The proper, opposite gender equivalent to a man refusing to raise a baby or pay child support is a woman refusing to raise a baby or pay child support, not a woman having an abortion. When a man makes this refusal, the woman has to raise it on her own or give it up for adoption. Likewise, when a woman makes this refusal, the man has to raise it on his own or give it up for adoption.
/r/MensRights14/03/16 02:12 PM
1

Your "expert analysis" was pretty lulzy.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/02/16 12:48 AM
6

She didn't try to use the pussy pass, so it was never denied. In addition, she didn't blame the dads for the murder. She criticized them for being absent. She doesn't get why they'd be mad at her for killing their kids when they weren't around to raise them anyway. Even if she did blame someone else for her own actions, and that person happened to be a man, it wouldn't be an example of trying to use the pussy pass. To use the pussy pass is to demand a lighter punishment or no punishment for no o…
/r/PussyPassDenied18/01/16 10:33 PM
9

I think she means that she's well read on the topic of feminism and similar topics, and has been studying it and advocating it for a long time.
/r/MensRights17/01/16 07:08 PM
5

The quote in that picture really annoys me because it removes the blame from the people who actually make others suffer.
/r/MensRights17/01/16 07:05 PM
-1

I don't think her winning the lottery had anything to do with being married.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/01/16 02:45 PM
1

/r/lewronggeneration
/r/MensRights25/12/15 10:24 PM
-4

Why the hell didn't you accept her offer to send nudes?
/r/PussyPassDenied30/11/15 02:22 PM
0

Reddit loves it when the government uses force to bend people to the will of those in power.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/11/15 09:07 PM
1

What audio?
/r/MensRights26/08/15 04:23 AM
-1

This is a very old quote. There is a strong possibility that she doesn't hold this view anymore.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 01:39 PM
1

A recording of someone giving consent is worthless. Consent can be withdrawn at any time. Edit: Furthermore, if consent is withdrawn after the video has been recorded, rapists now have a better chance of getting people to side with them. They'll just show people the video, and they'll think the victim is making false accusations.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 05:59 AM
-2

I'm saying you can't conclude that male victims are more likely to be arrested unless you see the numbers for both sexes. Making a post that emphasizes the mistreatment of men specifically has a tendency to make people think it's a men vs women problem when it could very well be a law enforcement vs victims problem. Many people who read that title will assume that this problem is worse for men than it is for women despite not knowing the statistics for female victims. I just don't like posts tha…
/r/MensRights31/05/15 07:41 AM
-73

What percentage of female victims are arrested or threatened with arrest? I can't open the TIL OP's link on mobile, but I'm guessing that the statistics for female victims are not included, which would definitely warrant a removal by the mods. I'd even consider that submission propaganda without the statistics for both sexes so they can be compared. Since I can't read the document, can anyone else tell me if this vital information is in there?
/r/MensRights30/05/15 03:03 PM
3

You think it was an accident?
/r/MensRights10/03/15 07:57 PM
29

It's perfectly fine to agree with someone on one issue while disagreeing with them on other issues.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 07:46 PM
0

When he stated what he believed was a biological reason why it's okay to call women sluts for the same behavior as men, I had a cringe overload and palmed my face with excessive force. He completely disregarded the fact that modern society is not the same as the caveman society in which those concepts were true. We fuck for pleasure now. When a woman chooses to have safe sex with a man who would make a shitty father, that doesn't mean she makes poor reproductive choices. I feel bad for anyone wh…
/r/PussyPassDenied28/12/14 11:06 PM
-15

Couldn't finish it. Dude was too full of shit.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/12/14 12:39 PM
-4

I see your point, and I don't think you're wrong, but I was responding to the comment above me, as well as OP's title. Both imply that the recent news of a woman killing 8 kids makes it inappropriate to talk about the danger that men pose to kids, as if that danger temporarily goes away as soon as there's a story of a female child killer.
/r/MensRights21/12/14 04:54 AM
-15

Let's be honest. One woman killing 8 kids probably doesn't have much effect on global statistics. I doubt that woman's crime put women in the lead as the gender that kills the most kids.
/r/MensRights21/12/14 01:10 AM
2

That retort should only be used as a joke, not a serious argument, for hopefully obvious reasons. To use a more extreme example, imagine someone walking down the street wearing a shirt that said, "I hate [racial slur]." In that situation, I imagine many of you would say something to the effect of, "He deserves whatever he gets for wearing that." There are times when looking a certain way or displaying a certain message, whether on purpose or not, warrants a certain response. However, this concep…
/r/MensRights15/11/14 08:32 PM
3

The soundtrack to OP's discussion: http://youtu.be/h3xtSSF2dBs
/r/MensRights19/08/14 12:16 AM
1

To be fair, it's not an equal comparison. The first article made no mention of sex toys. If the second article said that men who masturbate (without toys) are losers, it would be a clear double standard. Still, I think their description of men who use toys is out of line.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 01:12 AM
2

Uhhh... They could try enforcing the law...
/r/MensRights16/05/14 04:34 AM
3

I think you just committed a No True Scotsman fallacy while criticizing people for committing a No True Scotsman fallacy. You dismiss the notion that a real feminist is what they say it is while insisting it's what you say it is.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 04:17 PM
0

OP is an ordinary citizen (not a business) who actively worked toward the goal of censoring people. That's what I initially complained about. Even though it was FB who made the final decision, OP assisted them. Besides, as I mentioned before, it doesn't matter who censors. I'm against censorship in general. I think anyone who supports it is a scumbag, whether it's a business or an individual. I don't care what FB's rules are. I disagree with the rules. Though I understand that those rules only e…
/r/MensRights11/03/14 05:06 AM
0

What is the difference between being censored by the government and being censored by citizens? Isn't the result the same either way? I disagree with Facebook's censorship, and I therefore disagree with those who bring certain groups and pages to FB's attention with the intention of having them censored.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 02:25 AM
0

You're a scumbag for supporting censorship. Read the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 10:08 PM
1

"What every woman wants" and "Women desire" both set off my bullshit detector. Maybe most women like certain things, but it's best not to make assumptions. To find out what she likes, talk to her. Some women are dominant in bed, and some men are passive. Edit: To find out what a man likes, his SO should talk to him. It's the same from either perspective of the relationship.
/r/MensRights21/02/14 11:21 PM
0

That was a poor use of the term.
/r/MensRights27/01/14 02:41 PM
-4

The cartoonist didn't put much thought into this. If you leave your partner so they have to raise the kid on their own, and you don't pay child support, you're a deadbeat. That's the part I agree with. There are deadbeat moms and deadbeat dads. However if you end the pregnancy, there is no child to raise. You can't be a deadbeat if there's no kid. The woman in the cartoon didn't leave her partner to raise the kid on his own. She didn't do what the man did, so it would be unfair to call them both…
/r/MensRights26/01/14 03:22 AM
20

In this case it's not just mindless name calling. It's identification. That mod actually is a cunt, and has been identified as one for trying to hinder the free exchange of ideas. The mod's cunty behavior is on display now, so it should be obvious to anyone who values free speech and open discussion. If you don't like the word "cunt," then maybe "one who suppresses free speech" is better. "Cunt" is for brevity.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 08:55 PM
-7

Better call Saul!
/r/MensRights25/10/13 09:55 AM
12

It's stupid to take the Pitchford story seriously as a death threat. But at least doing so would be consistent with taking YouTube comments seriously as rape threats. All or nothing. Personally, I take neither seriously.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 11:20 PM
32

I think they were trying to reduce the number of innocent students punished. They wanted to punish the fewest number of students while ensuring that the guilty one is among them. The problem, as someone else pointed out, is that a female student could have easily posted the note in the boys' bathroom.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 08:58 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter