TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Sawses Archive

View 0 posts and 410 comments by Sawses on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

At that point, you're arguing that they should get paid at least as much as the women, based on economic value. So we agree entirely, I think. So the men should strike too, and if they're actually worth that much, they'll get paid more as well!
/r/MensRights09/02/19 05:18 AM
2

Like I said: it's an economic question. Whatever should or should not be, we know that they get paid that 70-ish grand a year for the same reason that actors make millions or a janitor makes 18-30K--not because of their skill or how hard they work, but because they bring in profit either directly or indirectly.
/r/MensRights09/02/19 04:29 AM
2

You should not be paid a salary while playing for an amateur national team. Why shouldn't they? If them not playing hurts profits more than paying them more...then by every rule of economics, they would naturally get paid more if the consequences of doing otherwise was a strike. Whatever you think of whether amateur sports should be paid or not, the bottom line doesn't lie. If they weren't worth the pay raise to keep, they wouldn't have gotten that raise.
/r/MensRights09/02/19 03:50 AM
13

But that's fair; they went on strike, and got a pay raise because it turns out they're worth that much while still being profitable. Otherwise they wouldn't have gotten the raise. Whatever the reason for that value, I don't see a problem.
/r/MensRights08/02/19 08:25 PM
1

Wouldn't that be possible as an average? It'd be a really high standard deviation, but still.
/r/MensRights04/02/19 08:28 PM
1

I'm sure some people are that way too.
/r/MensRights03/02/19 01:18 AM
6

I think that's the reason they're disgusted--they see a dildo as an impersonal tool and a sex doll as an attempt at emulating a female. It's why most don't object to the aforementioned pocket pussy. From there, they assume that means that the men who use those dolls see the doll as ideal instead of a woman--and therefore that any woman they'd want would, in their mind, be like the doll. I think the truth is quite flipped: for any number of reasons, a man who uses a sex doll does so because it's …
/r/MensRights02/02/19 03:41 AM
12

I find it...somewhat interesting that most men would find a sex doll more palatable than something like a fleshlight, whereas women are the reverse and would find a male sex doll creepy as hell (for the most part). When I think about how I feel about the choice between a fleshlight and a sex doll, I find the idea of a fleshlight kind of unpleasant mostly because it seems a little...pointless. My hand can do just as good a job, thank you very much. A lot of the fun of sex is bodily contact, looki…
/r/MensRights02/02/19 02:27 AM
5

It makes me feel lucky that my girlfriend and I are both more...nuanced in our views than most people seem to be. We both recognize that there are lots of shitty things women have to deal with due to gender roles...and that men deal with the inverse of many of those problems. It doesn't reduce the problems of one group to agree that the other has problems.
/r/MensRights27/01/19 09:08 PM
2

Are there any good alternatives? I've tried finding something I like, but...well, nothing seems to compare in quality. I've still got three more razors after my current one so I have about six months until I need to find an alternative.
/r/MensRights22/01/19 03:31 AM
1

Better education? Maybe; I got lucky in some ways in that area. Smarts have nothing to do with it, though! It's all about learning to learn and learning to apply what you learn. If you can troubleshoot a computer, fix a car, or solve a money problem, then you're doing what school should teach you to do.
/r/MensRights22/01/19 03:25 AM
2

Do you have any recommendations for those of us who don't have fine hair? I've been looking and haven't found anything I really like. I'd love if you knew of something!
/r/MensRights21/01/19 08:50 PM
2

If you aren't shaped and changed by your experiences, then you aren't learning.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 06:10 PM
-1

Honestly Gillette makes a damn fine razor. I've yet to find anything that does the job as well for somebody with thicker hair.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 06:09 PM
41

Could you? That sounds extremely interesting. I'm in education and I think it would really benefit me to hear your perspective, if you're open to giving it.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 04:58 PM
1

the comparison of education with the crime of rape does not hold water in my opinion That's why I'm not comparing--at the end of the day, there isn't a good reason to dismiss education for weeks or months unless the student can't do it due to the circumstances. It's not a matter of priorities; it'd be like cancelling school for the semester because the winter is particularly heavy and there are lots of snow days. Just go when you can, stay when you can't. I do not use algebra on a daily basis...…
/r/MensRights20/01/19 05:29 PM
3

Rape is a serious serious crime. Yes, that's why you get the police to handle it! Learning and social activities and all the rest of it can go to hell. Why? The police don't move particularly fast--and that's a good thing. They need to be careful or they can ruin somebody's life. For the weeks or months that the investigation goes on, life continues for everybody. maybe one party studies at home or in another room is the best you can do. But then who do you move? The accuser, because they're the…
/r/MensRights20/01/19 04:06 PM
1

Petitions aren't that unusual. These people don't understand law...then again, neither do I or most people. They're thinking about it from the position of a rape victim--why should an innocent person be forced to relive intense trauma repeatedly just to see a little justice done? Without context, that's obviously kind of shitty. If we know somebody's been hurt that deeply, then why should we make them suffer more? The answer, of course, is that we don't know they've been hurt or who did it. The …
/r/MensRights20/01/19 02:53 PM
2

The trouble is that, as an educator, your job is to ensure your students can learn as effectively as possible. Since learning is a social activity, social factors can impact that learning. Let's say you're a high school principal, and a student comes to you about a sexual assault that happened on school grounds perpetrated by another student. Of course you call the police. A police investigation will happen. What do you do while that's going on, though? What if the two have classes together? Tha…
/r/MensRights20/01/19 02:49 PM
-1

Huh, TD came in handy for once. Have they gotten better? Back during and for the first year after the election they were as much a cesspool as all their left-leaning analogs are.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 02:02 AM
-4

Right on all fronts! Remember, if you just go, "Lol wrong," then I can go, "Lol right," and neither assertion is less valid.
/r/MensRights14/01/19 06:03 PM
-49

You'd be surprised; it seems like most of the good porn stars are actually pretty damn smart. I wouldn't be too startled if it came out that the average pornstar has a higher IQ than the average person. It takes a certain level of connections and capability to actually be a pornstar--looks is pretty secondary, since makeup and movie magic. Body type, though, we can talk about.
/r/MensRights14/01/19 02:49 PM
15

Just be happy for him. It doesn't need proof to support him. Worst case you support a troll, best case you support a guy who went through hell. That's the only thing this impacts; just don't bring it up as evidence of something.
/r/MensRights10/01/19 05:31 AM
3

You can produce milk without excessive breast growth. Also there are attachments you can get that supply milk and still make the baby feel like it's really breastfeeding.
/r/MensRights10/01/19 03:15 AM
9

With the right hormone therapy, it's possible. Or the wrong hormone imbalance, that happens too.
/r/MensRights10/01/19 03:04 AM
1

Not me! I generally don't bother voting on replies. I've actually been thinking in this general sphere for a few years--I started off on /r/MensRights, in fact. Then I went to college and learned a little more about how activism has worked historically and...at this point, I'm basically interested in trying to organize men's advocacy into a shape that's been effective in the past for other groups that had to deal with institutional or cultural incongruity. The way I see it, we're going about thi…
/r/MensRights30/12/18 11:31 PM
1

What can I say? Maybe people think that I'm right. As a general rule, if somebody starts out calling names, then they're out to be upset rather than to try to have a good dialogue. Since you haven't directly called me any names yet, I'll gladly answer his points to you. However, I do make allowance for the backhanded nature of your comment.
/r/MensRights30/12/18 09:15 PM
1

Afraid not, my friend. It's a matter of the scientific method--we can demonstrate that not all differences are social, and we can demonstrate that not all differences are innate. The innate ones exist...but so do the social ones. The rub is trying to differentiate between them such as to avoid being unfair as a society to either men or women. Still, I don't think I'm going to convince you of that, today. Have a nice day!
/r/MensRights30/12/18 08:48 PM
1

You're assuming that difference is entirely innate--that's my disagreement. It's not complicated...but simple or not it's still a question we lack information about. It's far, far from settled in the mind of the scientific community.
/r/MensRights30/12/18 08:40 PM
1

Dr. Baron-Cohen's work on the sexually-dimorphic aspects of human neurology demonstrates some developmental, structural, and other differences between the male and female brain. Most people don't argue against that--it's fact that men and women are physically and mentally different in some ways. However, that does not mean all differences are innate. We know that society can influence preferences. It's hard to determine which of those differences are innate, isn't it? We know some are due to Bar…
/r/MensRights30/12/18 08:22 PM
1

Honestly, you're a moron. Ad hominem: Red flag, six yard penalty! Dismissal of an argument through the use of personal attacks.
/r/MensRights30/12/18 07:42 PM
1

Yes, I look at that data and go, "Okay. So we know that greater empowerment leads to more stereotypical choices. That means that either men and women naturally tend toward certain roles or that our society teaches men and women to want to go into different fields at different rates." Can we agree that the data doesn't disprove either of those hypotheses?
/r/MensRights30/12/18 07:41 PM
1

What I'm saying is that when all things [in terms of empowerment] are equal men and women choose different paths. I think our point of disagreement is in what that fact means. You seem like you believe it implies men and women naturally gravitate to certain roles. For myself, I think that the data supports both that conclusion and the other one, so you can't use it to rule out either. Social teachings have an impact--I'm not saying that's a bad thing or even less than ideal, but it does act as a…
/r/MensRights30/12/18 05:34 PM
2

It's better than the alternative of having the word mean something bad. I'm saying we ought to use the techniques that have been successful in the past.
/r/MensRights30/12/18 05:03 PM
-1

I just explained them to you, haha.
/r/MensRights30/12/18 09:49 AM
0

The data is clear, yes--it's the implications of that data that are up for debate. The core mechanic of the scientific method is invalidation. You can never prove something true, but you can prove something false. Further, a single study is very, very narrow in scope. It takes a dozen or more to make a case for anything really; a review article is usually your best bet for that sort of thing, and those exist for this topic. This is observational data--that is, we know certain things about the so…
/r/MensRights30/12/18 08:39 AM
1

That data can be interpreted two ways--it can be used as evidence that women and men naturally prefer different things...or that society pushes men and women to do different things. The data does not invalidate either hypothesis. A lot of younger feminists don't understand the difference between internalized oppression and genuine desire brought about by social climate. At a certain point, preferring to work with kids is just a preference rather than a burdensome expectation. Sure, it might not …
/r/MensRights30/12/18 07:44 AM
13

Basically, this subreddit deserves a fair chunk of its reputation. Sure, it's not a hate subreddit...but it's easily the most negative activist subreddit I've ever seen that doesn't have a better alternative. We need to take ownership of our expectations and our problems. It's easy to point out inequalities...but it's also ineffective. Arguably, the feminist movement has been an unrivaled success. Everything they aim for, they get. No political party can say the same. And they got there by stirr…
/r/MensRights30/12/18 07:32 AM
12

Arguably, feminism (at least, the feminism academics describe) doesn't care whether or not women and men naturally prefer different things. It's a moot point. The trouble comes in when one group wants to do one thing but society tells them not to. It's entirely possible women prefer childcare roles more often than men, for example. In a truly gender-equal society, that's absolutely fine and no problem...but that society must also be just as okay with that woman hopping into STEM and treat that w…
/r/MensRights30/12/18 04:49 AM
29

Typically, student activist groups are...a little exclusionary. They're new to the whole inclusivity thing and don't really understand that you're supposed to encourage diversity through appreciation of the other rather than through exclusion of the normative. Honestly, it's almost as bad as online activist groups. They're batshit crazy on average, and at best a little culty. There are groups that wisely handle the goals of equality under the law and in the public mind, but they're almost always…
/r/MensRights30/12/18 04:40 AM
35

To be totally fair here, this type of image is pretty cringeworthy all-around. It reminds me of those Christian copypaste images my conservative Facebook friends use, or the "Southern life" ones, or the super-left ones. This is pretty much a cheap shot attacking something that most folks will agree is at best tacky and well-meaning and at worst downright harmful.
/r/MensRights28/12/18 05:48 PM
2

Generally speaking, throwing your baby out of a window minutes after birth is a pretty good evidence of mental illness. If you don't want a baby, there are lots of ways to not have a baby or to even just not have to live with a baby. A sane person doesn't throw a baby out a window. Certainly not unless there are lots and lots of other instances of antisocial behavior prior. In her case, this was the only really crazy thing she'd done. Remember, the prosecutor is not going to want to concede ment…
/r/MensRights25/12/18 08:55 AM
2

I'd argue the same for anybody that needs mental help. Judging from the circumstances, she sounds like she was in an altered state of consciousness. Read through the court documents--even skim them, and I think you'll agree. There is bias in the court, much in the same way that there's bias in the workplace, the classroom, and everywhere else. Still, most of the clickbaity, outrageous headlines about sentencing are actually pretty reasonable. The truly unfounded ones are a minority of the ones t…
/r/MensRights25/12/18 06:18 AM
2

Him being sentenced like she was only sets an example for teenagers to be able to kill their unwanted children with a punishment of probation.. Alternatively, it also sets an example of the justice system recognizing that a 16-year-old is still only partway to being an adult, and that cases of mental illness (which the judge recognizes this to be) require treatment rather than harsh jail sentences. When you're 16, you quite literally cannot think the same way a 24-year-old can. Not because of li…
/r/MensRights24/12/18 10:18 PM
2

Reread what I wrote, and explain what I am saying.
/r/MensRights24/12/18 09:03 PM
26

If the kid's dad did the same thing the same day and was the same age, he would be tried as an adult and executed if possible. I'd argue that would be the injustice, and the hypothetical dad should be sentenced like the OP's example was. This is justice done right, and too many people are getting mad about "but if it was a man...!!!" Really; there are enough examples where it is a man. Get upset about those, and actually do some good.
/r/MensRights24/12/18 06:29 PM
3

My question for you: should circumcision (male or female) be illegal? Not from a precedent standpoint, but from an ethical one.
/r/MensRights23/12/18 04:22 PM
13

What percentage of non-white males have a disqualifying record, do you think? Personally, I'm more inclined to believe it's because the USA is 70% white. Plus, rural areas employ the vast majority of firefighters...and most rural areas are way more than 70% white.
/r/MensRights22/12/18 05:47 PM
1

I don't think we'll see eye to eye on this; it isn't as obvious to me as it apparently is to you. Still, have a nice day.
/r/MensRights21/12/18 03:50 PM
18

I think this fits here; it's a joke because the boy clearly has absolutely no regrets years on, was 16 at the time (thus it was above the age of consent), and was only illegal due to a breach of teacher ethics. That is when sexual misconduct is funny. Rape jokes have their place (that places does vary by person from on high to in a trashcan, of course), but...well, when the victim is suffering and says as much, we need to be quiet and listen.
/r/MensRights21/12/18 05:52 AM
4

I mean, I can't really oppose a person's right to refuse a pregnancy. I can call that person hateful, evil, spiteful, and unworthy of life...but I can't stop them. They have that right as much as anyone else. If I were forced to choose between saving her life or almost anybody else's, though... Let's just say she'd better hope there's no afterlife. At least saving Stalin would mean he got to face trial, after all.
/r/MensRights21/12/18 05:14 AM
1

The trouble with a prohibition on divorce is that it actively hurts everybody involved, especially the child. Not to mention violation of rights, which is a bigger concern for me. While I do agree that an excess of divorces, fatherless kids, and so on is a problem...I see them as symptoms and indicators rather than the root of the problem. In my view, directly fixing the symptoms is going to make matters worse, while fixing the underlying problem (whatever that is) is the only solution.
/r/MensRights21/12/18 12:39 AM
1

I'm going to go with how a 3rd grader would read it and what the letter actually says, rather than any implications. They might well exist...but in this situation, I can't see a better way to handle it if you're writing to somebody who lost.
/r/MensRights20/12/18 09:19 PM
0

You allege that she's implying something; I am instead saying you are inferring something she never implied.
/r/MensRights20/12/18 07:14 PM
3

I...disagree. Speaking from experience, having your parents married is not at all automatically better for the child. Moreover, it's a violation of the rights of both the husband and wife. Their duties include providing for, caring for, and adequately raising the child--they should not be allowed to escape those duties. A marriage is a union of consenting adults; if the adults no longer consent, then it is no longer a marriage. They have no duties to one another in our society, and I would great…
/r/MensRights20/12/18 05:12 PM
1

She was the only girl in her class that was running. Says so in the article.
/r/MensRights20/12/18 04:09 PM
0

I am; you infer that the reason she lost was because she's a girl. There's a big difference between inference and implication. Sure, she might have intended it as a read-between-the-lines thing...but the actual things she said were perfectly acceptable, and I doubt anybody not looking specifically for that meaning would see it.
/r/MensRights20/12/18 02:57 PM
3

Exactly my thoughts; she's literally just telling the girl not to give up because she lost, and recognizing that it took some guts to do a thing when you're a little different from everybody else doing it. I've got a lot of disagreements with Hillary on a political level, to say nothing of a moral one...but I can't pick on her too much for what she wrote. The folks in this sub really are too quick to latch onto rage-bait. I'd give quite a lot for a sub that's actually constructive without active…
/r/MensRights20/12/18 04:05 AM
23

Arguably, it's okay to say, "Hey, not a lot of folks like you were running. Good on you for doing it anyway." I don't see a big problem with what she said, except relating it only to the girl's female-ness. I'm going into education, and I actively encourage people to seek responsibility and leadership roles. It's something to nurture. Honestly, there is a perception among women that they can't do certain things. I'd argue it's actually stronger among women than men, though--in the same way that …
/r/MensRights20/12/18 03:24 AM
2

I was asking if you had the option to join a club that offered the same opportunities--since, if you did, then they could just say, "Hey, come on, it's not like you can't do robotics." If you can't, though...well, that's when you can actually have a case. There are opportunities you simply don't have, when the resources are not only there but have been allocated for the purpose. I'd be willing to bet lots of boys would be willing to join a robotics club, after all.
/r/MensRights16/12/18 01:00 AM
2

Most likely. I took a shotgun approach to my electives, though, and just took a lot of introductory classes to many different fields. It comes in handy occasionally, but usually only when it comes to connecting my biology knowledge to something else.
/r/MensRights15/12/18 11:43 PM
52

Most of what I learned has been advanced problem-solving, articulating arguments, and analyzing data. I'm convinced that the money I spent is worth it if only to obtain those skills.
/r/MensRights15/12/18 04:51 PM
2

Thank you for the heads up! That's important to know.
/r/MensRights14/12/18 07:12 PM
1

Yeah, that sounds like abuse, since the child's actual desires aren't being weighed. Since I'm in education, I've done a little reading in this area--since insisting on your child's gender without their desire can be damaging to them, therapists suggest that the child is the guide in this area. For example, if a child strongly, insistently, and consistently identifies as the other gender, then it's something to maybe think about. Some children will want to conform to the gender norms of the othe…
/r/MensRights14/12/18 02:46 PM
16

She's not really much of one for thinking from the perspective of others. To her, the idea felt a lot like what she imagined it would feel like to grab and play with a little boy's penis, and so it was out of the question. I'm quite happy to say I'm much more empathetic and intelligent than she is. Not that it's any great achievement, really.
/r/MensRights14/12/18 07:16 AM
1

Can you provide a source on that one? The closest thing I can think of to that is puberty blockers, and those are used on females as well. Plus, they're reversible enough that we haven't yet seen any physiological side effects in those who stopped taking them--though I suspect we'll see them as the years go on, but that is a wholly unscientific opinion that I hold.
/r/MensRights14/12/18 07:14 AM
1

I'd argue those are the crazy outliers--much like the other crazy outliers who do force young girls to play with dolls to become more feminine. Remember, we live in a nation of over 300 million--you're going to have a pretty large number of those crazy outliers even though they make up a tiny portion of the actual population. Let's try not to generalize: men suffer enough from generalizations about us that we really shouldn't hop on that bandwagon.
/r/MensRights14/12/18 07:12 AM
22

For perspective--my mom's primary argument for circumcision was the fact that she didn't want to have to digitally manipulate my foreskin as a child, since it seemed too much like molestation to her. Not so much a common belief as a symptom of my mom's general crazy, but still. Of course, I don't feel particularly violated by said circumcision so I'm only really upset by it from an ethics standpoint rather than an emotional one.
/r/MensRights14/12/18 07:09 AM
13

pro-women laws. I recommend phrasing this a little less positively. Sexually discriminatory laws, perhaps.
/r/MensRights14/12/18 06:41 AM
4

Are there inclusive equivalents to these clubs, out of curiosity? I'm in education, and...yeah, you'll have a much stronger leg to stand on as long as there are equivalent opportunities available to you. It still sucks and is problematic if there's a special not-white-male-only opportunities, but as long as you have just as many opportunities to do the same sorts of things, then at least you won't be missing out too terribly much.
/r/MensRights14/12/18 06:40 AM
2

We can't have a "violence against children" act because women are more likely than any other group to abuse children. Can you provide metrics and statistics for this claim? I ask because children's advocacy is something of a personal interest of mine, and I'm in the education field so...yeah, right up my alley.
/r/MensRights14/12/18 06:29 AM
7

That's one of the reasons I want to maybe go into admin after a few years. I think I can facilitate equality far, far better than most candidates.
/r/MensRights08/12/18 03:52 AM
-4

While there are problems in society that men face...women taking over the world isn't one of them. The whole "the future is female" thing is silly and in bad taste, but fortunately most people don't actually like that saying enough to pick it up. We should focus on the actual problems rather than on a politician's questionable phrasing.
/r/MensRights05/12/18 03:36 PM
1

I'm talking about the societal expectation that women should be the one to stay home; should we address that, if lots of women aren't happy with that expectation?
/r/MensRights30/11/18 08:35 PM
-1

in having a child.
/r/MensRights30/11/18 08:21 PM
2

There is a certain amount of burden that a woman must, by nature of her sex, put up with in having a child. That doesn't necessarily include a year of staying at home. It means anywhere from one month to four months away from work, depending on her job. I've had more than one woman I've worked with work quite literally until the week of her due date, though I understand that's due to the nature of my field. My question for you is what you think we should do about the societal expectation that th…
/r/MensRights30/11/18 07:39 PM
1

I agree with you, but I think what you're talking about is a separate (but related) conversation--whether we ought to accommodate that biological obstacle or not. I was specifically talking about tending a newborn...since somebody does have to stay home and deal with that, and it's usually the woman. That's an inequality that hurts both men and women, right? How do you think we should address that, whether it's biological or sociological? It obviously causes difficulties for both men and woman, …
/r/MensRights30/11/18 07:34 PM
7

I think we both agree that it's only reasonable that a person with less productive time (experience) should be paid less. I'm asking whether you think that a year's absence (leaving a job, maternity leave, etc.) can account for a permanent 39% decrease in earnings compared to those who didn't do that same thing. I don't know about you, but that definitely doesn't sound reasonable from a business perspective. And if it does, I want to live where you do--39% income increase in a year is a dream co…
/r/MensRights30/11/18 07:29 PM
6

I'm curious about what you think about my comment here. How does that impact your belief on the matter? Remember, we're talking about women who left for a year for any reason.
/r/MensRights30/11/18 07:23 PM
8

Its somewhat unfair to the other workers to be considered at the same position career-wise with someone not present for a whole year. But..at 39%, that's a pretty steep price for one year. I can count on one hand the number of fields where you can get a 39% increase in income in the space of a year. It makes me think there's something else going on, since no employer's going to value a year's worth of experience that much.
/r/MensRights30/11/18 06:30 PM
9

Its like they know why its happening but keep on acting like its because of some inequality. They do know why it's happening. Women are more often the ones who take time off to take care of children. It's expected that a woman will, at some point, take a year or two off for a newborn. Somebody has to, after all. For the overwhelming majority of couples, continuing to work through the newborn phase isn't going to be the best choice for a number of reasons. The objection is more that it's usually …
/r/MensRights30/11/18 06:27 PM
2

I mean, you're convincing somebody to give you money who otherwise never would. Nothing to lose, really.
/r/MensRights29/11/18 05:17 AM
13

Or just as gay. Much easier and harder to suspect.
/r/MensRights29/11/18 02:25 AM
2

The question is which came first; since I could totally see the sanitation crisis having had a day since the 80s.
/r/MensRights20/11/18 07:48 AM
15

It's important to recognize that men struggle and work and suffer just like everyone else--we ought to help people based on what they need, not based on their gender, skin color, religion, or sexual orientation. If you hear someone saying, "Please, help me!" then...well, help them. Stereotypes be damned; if somebody says they need help, then they do.
/r/MensRights19/11/18 07:30 PM
4

For a second, I was wondering why a -40 shitpost was the most upvoted comment--now I understand it's the only one. Let's bury him, boys.
/r/MensRights19/11/18 07:28 PM
12

In brief: She rescinded protections against for-profit colleges committing fraud and/or providing a useless education in exchange for excessive student loans, specifically wants to strengthen Christian private schools (rather than just private schools in general), has cut the federal budget going toward students at-risk for dropping out, struggling, etc. This is more of a side quibble: She's inadequate for the job as a whole, and her goals are not to promote education for America's students. She…
/r/MensRights19/11/18 07:01 AM
14

I'm glad! As a man going into education... I intensely dislike almost everything she stands for, and consider her a blight on the federal government. However, I suppose there's something to the saying, "A broken clock's right twice a day."
/r/MensRights19/11/18 06:24 AM
3

Haha, I'll keep it in mind. I've had to do my fair share of that...and it only really helps you learn to recognize things on tests. And hate science, so...yeah, not gonna do it.
/r/MensRights15/11/18 08:13 PM
2

Not a gender-related one, but...yeah, bad admin really sucks by all accounts. It's one of the reasons I'm open to the possibility of being an administrator someday; I figure that it can't be that hard to be a decent one. Not even a good principal, just one who isn't actively hindering good teachers.
/r/MensRights15/11/18 07:05 PM
1

I don't really have a lot of options outside of academics; I figure I'll do what my gay, very progressive professor for one of my classes did--leave the door open, never be alone with students, etc. If a gay dude in the rural South can manage it, maybe I can too. If not? Well, maybe I'll have a story for you someday.
/r/MensRights15/11/18 07:02 PM
2

I'm going to be a science teacher in middle or high school next year. Care to elaborate?
/r/MensRights15/11/18 04:46 PM
2

I don't know why you're being downvoted; plenty of schools have locked rooms that allow you to avoid being seen totally nude.
/r/MensRights15/11/18 04:46 PM
1

I am!
/r/MensRights13/11/18 10:40 PM
1

That wasn't what we were talking about, haha.
/r/MensRights13/11/18 06:56 PM
3

I suppose, for me, I believe we can and should fix problems where we can and to try where we might not be able to. Things will never be perfect, but I consider it a moral failing to not try to improve them.
/r/MensRights13/11/18 05:40 PM
6

It's... I... Hm. Think of it this way--there's a problem among teenagers. Eating disorders. Body image problems. Lots of teens starve themselves or binge-eat and then purge, or just generally hate their bodies and it can cause significant damage both physical and mental. I don't suffer from those problems, but I recognize that there are aspects of our society that make these things far too common and I want them to stop. I want to help these people. Think of that, but with adult men and penises.
/r/MensRights13/11/18 05:10 PM
8

I'm bothered by its existence, since it harms many men.
/r/MensRights13/11/18 04:01 PM
27

What is the equivalence? Labiaplasty is not FGM, it is a specifically surgical procedure whose purpose and benefits are cosmetic. I could at least understand your objection if it were FGM, since the purpose is explicitly to reduce female pleasure rather than having that as a side-effect.
/r/MensRights13/11/18 01:33 PM
49

I dunno. If you want to get it done, then go for it. I don't care; it's a cosmetic surgery in that case. I'm more bothered by the social stigma that can, occasionally, go with being uncut.
/r/MensRights13/11/18 01:32 PM
-1

Basically, the girl scouts were made because the boy scouts excluded girls. Now the boy scouts see what they missed out on and are taking girls, but the girl scouts already have a brand and don't want to merge. It's a classic case of obsolescence.
/r/MensRights12/11/18 04:51 AM
8

The Boy Scouts are more cohesive,long standing, and organized. The Girl Scouts are much more troupe focused with shorter lifespans for groups. It's kinda like the Catholic Church versus the Baptists. One is ancient and has all the perks of that, and the other is numerous and versatile, but lacking the resources of a more unified sect.
/r/MensRights12/11/18 04:48 AM
23

I go to college in the mountains--even here, where everyone is young and relatively fit, it's only a 70% success rate.
/r/MensRights09/11/18 04:21 PM
1

In an ideal world, yes. Unfortunately, that's impractical under the current system. I'm going into education, and I can only make a dent. I'll only have them for a class for maybe a year or two.
/r/MensRights27/10/18 12:40 AM
-6

If that's the best counterargument, I think it's safe to say I'm probably right and that, after you think about it a bit, you'll realize that.
/r/MensRights26/10/18 10:05 PM
-2

I'm saying what I'd do if I were trying to test the hypothesis that I mentioned above: There's a hypothesis out there that playing with toys that boys typically do encourages tool-using, technical skill, spatial reasoning, etc., and that girls' toys improve empathy, social agility, and so on. This sounds like a bad methodology, though on its own merits I wouldn't be opposed to texting the hypothesis by having some classes with only "boy toys" and others with only "girl toys" and seeing what happ…
/r/MensRights26/10/18 10:02 PM
13

Yep, that's...nope, not research, just bigotry. If it was a hamfisted attempt at research, I could at least understand. Here, it's an utter lack of concern for half her students. Teachers ought to help their students reach their potential, whatever that potential may be--they shouldn't try to enforce equality by taking away opportunities.
/r/MensRights26/10/18 09:57 PM
-5

It's not discrimination if your entire class is given only one set of toys. So all boys and all girls one year, then all boys and all girls the next year. I think you misunderstood what I was saying, and that I thought what the teacher in question did was okay. Is that the case?
/r/MensRights26/10/18 09:54 PM
-9

It's not discrimination if your entire class is given only one set of toys. That's where she went wrong, if she was trying to do research. If I were to do that test, I'd give my kids a pre-test, then just "happen" to only have girly or boyish toys for a year. Next, I'd give a post-test. The year after, I'd flip it and only have the stereotypical toys for the other sex and administer a pre- and post-test. Does that make sense to you and /u/Historybuffman?
/r/MensRights26/10/18 09:17 PM
12

Assuming you do it right, you come out of it with analytical skills that mean you can fix pretty much any problem you come across, given enough time. You can learn much, much faster than you could before, and have exposure in enough different fields that you already have a framework for a lot of problems you might need to solve. That's to say nothing of being able to understand the world around you better than you ever did before. There's good reason to be skeptical of some of the crazies in aca…
/r/MensRights26/10/18 07:59 PM
-29

Not too long ago a feminist teacher was only allowing girls to play with legos and denying the boys. What was the context for this, anyway? It sounds like she was trying to do research on the impact of "tool-based" toys on student development. Or just has an absolute lack of understanding of how to encourage learners to branch out into things they aren't comfortable with. There's a hypothesis out there that playing with toys that boys typically do encourages tool-using, technical skill, spatial …
/r/MensRights26/10/18 07:50 PM
8

That makes a big difference. Age of consent and state make an enormous difference. As a teacher, it's abuse of position to engage in sexual activity with any student, sometimes even after they graduate. Add statutory onto it, and...well, you see the results. I get tired of all the rage bait on this sub. There's enough real injustice that context-less bullshit really ought to be butchered by us.
/r/MensRights16/10/18 03:26 PM
5

Not your generalization.
/r/MensRights13/10/18 04:09 AM
2

For the OP, yeah. And plenty of downvotes for the generalization it's based on.
/r/MensRights13/10/18 04:08 AM
3

Thanks for the heads-up! We here at /r/mensrights are among the first to point out this style of hypocrisy. If we of all people are mass downvoting/u/TibortheChechen, then that's a pretty great indicator that everybody worth hearing out probably thinks he's wrong.
/r/MensRights13/10/18 01:11 AM
0

That's super not a study.
/r/MensRights13/10/18 12:22 AM
-1

I'd actually like a study on this, too. Otherwise, I could just contradict you and there's no reason for them to believe you over me.
/r/MensRights12/10/18 10:19 PM
3

I'm not really sure about that; then again, I was raised in the South, and we're very much taught to do things for women and children. I bet it varies a ton by culture, though, so my guess might not be representative. Plus I'm going into education, so...haha, another bias there.
/r/MensRights03/10/18 02:55 AM
3

That seems a general rule for adults as a whole, though I do admit men would be expected to do it first.
/r/MensRights03/10/18 02:45 AM
-35

I mean, it depends. Enlisted men, construction workers, and several other groups have this issue. They're a tiny minority, but...well, so are mothers with 50-50 custody.
/r/MensRights28/09/18 08:45 PM
-64

I mean, I'm sure it's a struggle. It's also a struggle for some men not to grope and objectify women. Like men, however, women will cope. Gender equality requires some growing pains on both sides.
/r/MensRights28/09/18 08:35 PM
-14

I do like their image, though. I dunno, it's pretty great. EDIT: C'mon, it's pretty clever. I can see humor in something, even when something is offensive.
/r/MensRights28/09/18 04:01 AM
12

This is important; it's exactly the sort of generalization we don't want about men. Thanks for trying to lead by example; I know you guys take a bit of a hands-off approach in a lot of ways...but never forget the tone-setting power that you have. You don't have to engage in censorship to create a productive environment here, you just have to...well, do what you just did.
/r/MensRights28/09/18 03:56 AM
3

Yes, but that doesn't necessarily mean it can't still exist. You've just got derivative movements as well.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 05:17 PM
1

Feminism is a woman-focused movement meant to keep women from being at a disadvantage on average compared to men in any single facet. You know the stuff you believe about men's rights? Wanting equal treatment in family court, more equitable alimony and/or child support, less male-targeted imprisonment, better prison quality, and so on? Think about that general mindset, but for women's issues. The two movements really shouldn't be at odds, and yet they are. It's...frustrating, to say the least.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 04:28 PM
2

Thanks! Though I recommend making sure to vote for people who care about education and are willing to spend money on it; that's the best way to thank any teacher. :)
/r/MensRights25/09/18 11:46 PM
1

Arguably, there are lots of readers here and there. If even one changes their mind, isn't it worth making the rule be that positive reinforcement is given when warranted? Besides, I want people to see us here being the sort of people that are good and valuable to social equality. Men belong in that conversation, so we ought to make sure we look like we belong.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 02:47 PM
3

I'm going into education. A big thing they teach us is reinforcement. If you're going to negatively reinforce bad behavior, then you need to positively reinforce good behavior.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 12:31 PM
3

I'm using those terms specifically in the context of victim being the person wronged, and blaming as in assigning moral fault in part or as a whole to said wronged person for being wronged. It's why I noted that the phrase is often misused. I've considered being a Marxist, but I'm not a big fan of sharing--only child, you know?
/r/MensRights25/09/18 03:59 AM
6

What you're doing is victim blaming. Usually that term is misused...but here you're quite literally saying that this isn't an attempt to coerce her student. Speaking as a college student (and future teacher) it can be pretty damn intimidating to go place your trust in the people in power. If someone actually was coerced, then it's a problem.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 02:59 AM
1

That's what I don't like about this sub--there's so much, "Well, if men did this, there'd be a riot!" While that's true and worth noting, so many people use it as justification for acting just as inappropriately. The single most important question we can ask is whether or not we are doing what's best. Everything else (everything else) is secondary.
/r/MensRights23/09/18 05:32 AM
3

Being wrong and hateful doesn't deserve a ban.
/r/MensRights22/09/18 05:21 PM
5

It's a good thing to teach people about consent, since some people just are never taught. Then again, I think that morality is taught rather than innate, so that's my bias. We should make sure it's not aimed just at men, though. Our culture generally teaches that rape is bad, but it's totally conceivable that somebody could slip through the cracks.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 06:02 PM
1

I'm in a happy relationship with a great girl. Even if I were single, I'd rather be single than use a sex-bot. Not because it's immoral or weird or whatever (since sex is weird in general), but because at that point it would actually be more trouble and less enjoyable than using my life-long companion, Handy. Plus you clean it afterward... They'd need huge improvements, but...well, if I just want to get my rocks off, I'd be okay with it if it were actually some comparison to the 'real deal'. The…
/r/MensRights02/09/18 06:02 PM
6

Plus, most men don't want a woman-free music festival. That's like having a frat party with only dudes. Unless it's an LGBT frat full of gay dudes, that's not really going to be a lot of fun. Hanging out with just bros is fun and all, but I need to actually know the bros before I want it to be just them, haha.
/r/MensRights02/09/18 12:59 AM
7

No, I was being serious. As much as I don't pity him for what happened, on moral grounds I oppose it.
/r/MensRights02/09/18 12:57 AM
4

He's right, though. We have freedom to say whatever we want. We're able to hit people. What you mean is right, but...well, it's bad phrasing, haha.
/r/MensRights02/09/18 12:56 AM
25

Exactly. Based purely on what the guy believes, I think he deserves a punch in the face. He does, however, have the right to not get exactly what he deserves, simply because we as a society should champion free speech...by protecting even those we find most deserving of having it taken away.
/r/MensRights01/09/18 11:17 PM
3

This is one of two things she's done that I don't outright despise, and it's certainly the only one I wholeheartedly support. Everything else (including her stance on education as a whole) is despicable.
/r/MensRights01/09/18 10:55 PM
1

I'm not claiming to have an answer, just pointing out that there's at least a basis for the complaint.
/r/MensRights01/09/18 10:47 PM
30

And, to be clear, this isn't a double-standard situation. We know she did it, because both she and Bennett agree that it happened and that Argento knew he was underaged. It's probably the only situation where I'm okay with somebody being hung out to dry without a trial, since there's a confession available. Nobody should endure being done violence or reputation damage when they are innocent, but everybody we know who we know did it ought to face harsh scrutiny from here on out.
/r/MensRights01/09/18 09:49 PM
1

Yes, it's stupidly oversimplified and silly, but...I've actually done the reading on the studies that this comes from. Until recent decades, the most common sample was that of white men and less frequently white women. This isn't just men being sexist dickwads, though. It's just that it's really annoying to find a good sample. In a lot of Psych departments, you get either class credit or extra credit to participate in studies because it's the only way you can get decent data without paying money…
/r/MensRights01/09/18 05:18 PM
13

I'm not sure how representative your experience is; then again, you could say the same about mine. I know /r/MensRights isn't exactly the best place to talk about not shitting on feminism, but the only male-focused groups able to be made on my campus are ones dedicated to helping men through the lens of helping women. Not in a helping one helps both sense, but in the sense that men are the primary root of their own problems, and of the problems women face. It's a touch late for me to really get …
/r/MensRights01/09/18 04:23 AM
44

I'm going into education. I am, at any given moment, most likely outnumbered 5:1 by women. That's to say nothing of the fact that the ratio of women to men at my school is something like 65:35. There will never, ever be a male-focused event in the College of Education, and to suggest that would cause you problems. That being said, all the teachers will talk about how men are under-represented and how more male role models would be good. I think that's a good attitude to have...but there is a dou…
/r/MensRights01/09/18 04:06 AM
1

The media played a key part in the Civil Rights Movement, interestingly. It's more pervasive now though, you are right.
/r/MensRights28/08/18 01:43 AM
2

Can you source that for me? Because that's very interesting, and an incredibly interesting observation.
/r/MensRights28/08/18 01:28 AM
20

Just as a side note: Guys, welcome women who are interested in men's issues. I know we generally do here, but I figure I ought to say why: In every social movement, you need the group in power to be on-board in some way. Gandhi was Western-trained and had lots of white friends. MLK Jr. had the support of a large number of largely-white organizations and institutions (and, of course, the enmity of plenty as well). No movement can ever really get off the ground without the support of a non-insigni…
/r/MensRights26/08/18 04:55 PM
10

This is activism 101, and I think a lot of folks interested in men's issues want to forget that the strategies used in the women's, race, and sexual orientation movements are effective. Very effective, in fact. We ought to use them to our advantage, since there is literally decades of history we have to learn from. We can avoid the mistakes of those who came before, and do equality right.
/r/MensRights26/08/18 02:06 AM
2

So I've got some significant experience that can help you. I grew up very religious and in a culture where being secular was...frowned upon at best, and outright dangerous at worst. I even went to a bible college in the same vein. Your situation sounds quite similar--dogmatically accepted beliefs such that it causes severe emotional distress because of the thing that a person is--whether that's atheist, male, or anything else that isn't inherently bad. My advice? Duck your head, deal with it, fi…
/r/MensRights20/08/18 08:43 PM
0

Hey now, Title IX would be pretty okay if it extended to things like official clubs.
/r/MensRights20/08/18 01:15 PM
65

Good bot mod. Seriously, well done.
/r/MensRights20/08/18 01:08 PM
2

Thank you for the story! I definitely intend to only teach in places that have a relatively strong union--I want to know I've got somebody advocating for me if I need it.
/r/MensRights16/08/18 08:00 PM
2

Looks like I've got to be a principal, then, and stand for equality.
/r/MensRights16/08/18 02:27 AM
3

I mean, I can't just assume everyone is lying, or even that most are. Everyone says to be super careful, but almost nobody has any stories about why.
/r/MensRights16/08/18 01:33 AM
3

I'd think that here, of all places, I wouldn't need to emphasize this: The fact that other people suffer more doesn't do anything to diminish the suffering of others or our responsibility to alleviate it.
/r/MensRights15/08/18 09:52 PM
10

Is it that common an experience where you live? The male teachers around me say they've never had to deal with it, and didn't know anybody who did. I'll take your advice on the union/association thing, though--again, reasonable precaution.
/r/MensRights15/08/18 08:33 PM
7

I don't want that, any more than I want us to hire more women in the sciences. I'm going into education (and I'm a man); it's not that education isn't welcoming to men, but rather that people think it's not welcoming to men. Plus the terrible pay. It's the same deal with women in the sciences--that boys'-club mentality is all but dead in most places, and all the women I've asked in the sciences say that. And I know many, since my degree is actually in a hard science. The trouble is that when you…
/r/MensRights15/08/18 08:17 PM
14

Pretty similar when I was in school too. Of course, now there's almost no male teachers until middle school and even then, they're pretty rare. Men are finding that it's not worth the risk and I don't blame them. I'm a man going into middle school science education. I compare it to being struck by lightning--it happens. I can and should take all the basic precautions, but there's only so much you can do. Don't go climbing any flagpoles, and you'll more than likely be okay. It's not a guarantee, …
/r/MensRights15/08/18 08:13 PM
5

Is there any way you can appeal this? There's got to be--especially because you're worse off than you were before.
/r/MensRights14/08/18 11:44 PM
13

That sounds like a lawsuit-worthy situation. And you're right--but if it came down to it, I'd rather have a man simply to put my mind at ease that he is at least slightly less likely to have any unconscious bias against the male parent.
/r/MensRights14/08/18 08:19 PM
2

Since it sounds like you've got more experience in this than I do--how could one go about wanting to marry and have kids while also being protected from excessive payment and having less than half-custody of the kids, should we ever divorce? I'd quite happily give up the chance to get full custody if it meant not risking only being allowed to be Dad on the weekends. The best situation is two competent parents working together, anyway.
/r/MensRights14/08/18 08:18 PM
16

Why isn't this a slam dunk case, OP? The fact that you can prove that the courts thought it best to give you full custody of one child on account of abuse means you should at least be getting 50/50 with most of the kids. It sounds like the judge was punishing you for asking for full custody--appeal at least that overnight stay, to get back to where you were.
/r/MensRights14/08/18 08:15 PM
6

If I were to go into law, I'd work in family law. Then again, I'm going into education, so I sort of have a vested interest in childrens' welfare already.
/r/MensRights14/08/18 08:10 PM
14

It's like wanting a female OBGYN. Sure, a male one can do all the same things just as well, but you'll relate better with one who struggles with the same things you do, and may be better for you.
/r/MensRights14/08/18 08:09 PM
1

I didn't really need to take any of those in my biology major classes--though when I switched concentrations over to teaching, they did come on a little strong with it. No outright brainwashing or dismissal of other opinions (so long as they weren't unsubstantiated), but certainly based in social justice theory.
/r/MensRights14/08/18 05:09 AM
1

It doesn't necessarily matter whether the sciences welcome women or not. That's unimportant. The important point is whether students believe the sciences are welcoming to women. When you ask women scientists, something like 70% will say that, yes, it's welcoming and they don't face great persecution. When you ask women students, that number is significantly lower. Here, it's perception that matters, since in a very real sense that's just as important as the reality. After all, if you don't go in…
/r/MensRights09/08/18 03:34 AM
9

This could prove once and for all that there is no earnings gap OR that the gap is truly the results of women's choices. Keep in mind, most educated people in feminist circles don't actually believe men and women are paid differently for the same work in most fields. They believe that the difference in choices is due to pressure from society. So this posits the existence of women who want to work in programming, for example, but were discouraged when they were little. So now they're something el…
/r/MensRights07/08/18 05:57 PM
3

I grew up as a fundamentalist Baptist... Let me tell you, we're one hell of an exception to that rule. Don't even get me started on strict Mennonites, haha.
/r/MensRights06/08/18 03:53 AM
61

Remember, if it's true it's 80% in one area of Germany. That doesn't let us generalize very far, but it does tell us that we can't just trust that they aren't.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 02:59 PM
41

These sorts of things are more about the court system's awareness that the jury might be biased toward women, not because the criminal justice system itself is always biased toward women. Most of the time, you only see that when a judge gives a light sentence to someone who was convicted by a jury of their peers. Far more often than not, the prosecution is making a plea deal. In this case... Honestly, she's going to have this on her record at least until she's 47, since she's 29 right now. That …
/r/MensRights05/08/18 12:16 AM
8

Oh, of course. I used to hate the word "accountability" because of how much the fundamentalist culture I grew up in abused it...but in education, I guess I get it. Teachers ought to be under a microscope...but we all should be under the same microscope.
/r/MensRights03/08/18 11:42 PM
1

Personally, I'm okay with these high amounts...as long as the primary care provider gives a budget of that money for the courts and the financier.
/r/MensRights03/08/18 11:15 PM
2

I... Uh, well, sometimes. Maybe. I've yet to personally see any schools or administrations reluctant to hire men. I'm sure some exist, since every group has crazy outliers, but everything I've heard is that I'm going to be more desirable as an educator because I'm a man, and there are so few of us especially in middle and lower grades.
/r/MensRights03/08/18 09:14 PM
16

And men can't teach lower grades because everyone is sure he's a pedo, but apparently it's OK for female teachers to have sex with their students. Most people love having men in the lower grades teaching. You have a few problem people (a professor of mine got accused of wearing cologne to attract teen girls; he's gay as hell), but generally people want male teachers. I'm going into middle grades education, and apparently being a guy makes me highly desirable because students respond better to me…
/r/MensRights03/08/18 09:07 PM
13

Well yes, but I figure that's a lot like getting struck by lightning. Sure, it can happen out of nowhere, but you can only take so many precautions before it begins to defeat the point. If I don't climb any lightning poles, my chances are at least decent, looking at the odds.
/r/MensRights03/08/18 09:02 PM
0

I was with you up until you went into trying to interpret the argument in bad faith.
/r/MensRights03/08/18 07:50 PM
-2

What if they don't want them but can't afford to get it changed? Or just are too worried about the surgery?
/r/MensRights03/08/18 07:49 PM
36

there are virtually no initiatives to address this far more severe disparity. Talk about fucked up, right?" As a man going into middle school science education... According to my instructors and folks I know in education, I'm guaranteed a job nearly anywhere except the top districts, as long as I don't come across as the total useless waste of skin that I am.
/r/MensRights03/08/18 06:13 PM
1

I'm...somewhat libertarian, but also oddly socialist in a lot of ways. Basically, I'm for all the things that the Republicans claim to be (small government, adherence to the laws, respect for the rights of the individual, etc.), but I'm also of the opinion that the free market, totally unfettered, does not bring about the ideal society. A lot of folks would say that those views are utterly incompatible, though...well, I disagree. talking is sometimes doing. This is true. That's why we have a dut…
/r/MensRights03/08/18 04:53 PM
1

Let's not carry the disease analogy so far; in this case, the specifics are important enough that an analogy will lead us to faulty conclusions. If a person doesn't do anything wrong, then at that point the only thing you can protest is the thing that he is. That's the point we ought to talk about. If he is a hateful person, but nobody would have any idea until they asked him, is he actually doing any harm? I'd argue that, no, he's not. That means we don't have a duty to stop him from being the …
/r/MensRights03/08/18 02:49 PM
1

I can speak up, but why? I don't care if he's a racist asshole, as long as he's polite and courteous to black people. Even if that's because he knows he'll get crucified if he isn't, that's what matters.
/r/MensRights03/08/18 02:16 PM
1

Everyone has the right to say very nearly anything they want. The question is whether or not that is the only redeeming quality of what they have to say.
/r/MensRights03/08/18 01:18 PM
2

Were they your posts? That's... A good point, actually. Be the change you want to see in the world and all that. Thank you; sometimes we all need to get called on our whining. The irony isn't lost on me, haha.
/r/MensRights03/08/18 03:23 AM
3

including a Muslim woman Including Muslims is important, I think. They've got a fair bit further to go when it comes to women's empowerment, but they're also even further away from male equality than we are with how stiff their gender roles are. Getting Muslims on board is important, since maybe we can do it right this time and get men and women progressing instead of leaving one behind in liberation.
/r/MensRights03/08/18 03:11 AM
2

So we're in agreement, pretty much, that both should keep their jobs. I guess my main problem is that this sub spends so much time going on about double standards. Yes, they exist. Everybody here gets that. At this point it's more or less a masturbatory rage session. If we're going to point out injustices, we shouldn't go, "Fire Jeong because you think Gunn should have been fired!" We should instead go, "Stop advocating for firing Gunn, since you didn't fire Jeong!" I can count on one hand the n…
/r/MensRights02/08/18 11:32 PM
-7

Sure, there's a connection. You can train people to behave no matter what they believe, though. And frankly, I don't care what that asshole across the street wants to do to me, as long as he doesn't do it. I do believe that Gunn shouldn't be fired, and I also believe Jeong shouldn't be. If you think they both should be fired, that's also a reasonable position. I argued against Gunn's firing because I want them both to get the Jeong treatment. If you disagree, I expect nothing less than for you t…
/r/MensRights02/08/18 11:24 PM
-27

I don't care what she actually believes, so long as she behaves right. I want John Gunn to be reinstated as the director for Guardians of the Galaxy 3 after much worse stuff that he thought was funny, and apologized similarly, so I guess I ought to say she should stay too.
/r/MensRights02/08/18 11:16 PM
3

Quick question from someone who doesn't use Twitter. Would her tweets look different if she was replying to a deleted tweet?
/r/MensRights02/08/18 11:14 PM
-52

To be fair, she outright said she was trying to fuck with people, that she regrets it, and that she sees it as being highly inappropriate if meant sincerely. I don't care what she actually believes, so long as she behaves right. I want John Gunn to be reinstated as the director for Guardians of the Galaxy 3 after much worse stuff that he thought was funny, and apologized similarly, so I guess I ought to say she should stay too. Sure, they'd react differently if it were against black people, but.…
/r/MensRights02/08/18 10:22 PM
2

If they're using those beliefs to shape policy, then yes.
/r/MensRights01/08/18 02:53 PM
8

There are always crazy fringe people. It's one of the things that annoys me about this sub--there's so much rage-bait since it's what gets upvotes. We ought to focus on the actual, pervasive problems--not the crazies who are obviously only a tiny vocal minority. Focus on discussions about men's issues, actual policies and attitudes harming to helping men, and ways in which we can change or reinforce them. Not this nonsense; I can find you any number of people who say horrible things, and almost …
/r/MensRights01/08/18 12:41 AM
6

Just to point out, because I think here of all places this should be obvious: The fact that someone is suffering more does not reduce your own suffering in the slightest. Your suffering is as real and in need of relief as that of the child who is repeatedly raped and physically abused by their guardians. Your suffering is, most likely, much less severe...but that does not make it any more acceptable.
/r/MensRights31/07/18 01:54 AM
2

What I take issue with is you ASSUMING, based on anecdotal evidence, that women are being discouraged from science. Oh! I see where we're not quite linking up. I actually don't think women are being discouraged from the sciences. My degree is in biology--men were actually a slight minority in most of my classes. Anecdotally, I've found that a great many of my students believe women aren't welcome in the sciences. It doesn't matter whether they actually are or not, since the belief is what keeps …
/r/MensRights25/07/18 10:43 PM
2

Just so I'm clear on what you're arguing for, what would the scope of a study be that you believe would demonstrate that my opinion is incorrect? Do you want a peer-reviewed study of kids in the school I'm in? A peer-reviewed study specifically of the kids going into each new year? A peer reviewed study of middle-schoolers nationwide? Please don't think I'm trying to be pedantic or beat you over the head with education here; that's not what I mean to do. I just don't think we're talking about th…
/r/MensRights25/07/18 10:02 PM
2

It's important for how we deal with things as a society and for how we shape policy. A huge failing in the modern education system (in my opinion) is using statistics to guide individuals. Sure, it works out for plenty of people, but we need protocols in place to adapt what we do when those evidence-driven approaches don't apply to certain students. Still, if we didn't have those approaches, we'd have no way to know if we could be doing things better. As for anecdotes... That depends. In the con…
/r/MensRights25/07/18 09:49 PM
10

I'm...not really that upset with making it so people have to ask for help in order to get it, or teaching them that if they need help they ought to ask for it. Typically, I'll offer to help, but if they go, "No thanks, I'm good," then I won't help. It's honestly a pretty okay arrangement, I think. It's okay to offer to help before actually helping.
/r/MensRights25/07/18 08:40 PM
1

I'm not gonna just not correct kids when they say science is for boys, and I'm not gonna just not bring it up in class to clear things up when I hear it at least once in the course of any given semester. Whether it's an overall phenomenon or not isn't really important to my work--what's important is the perception where I'm working, since that is pretty much the only place I can do anything.
/r/MensRights25/07/18 08:04 PM
1

Like I said, it's a perception among students. I'm not talking about any reality beyond what students say and think is the reality.
/r/MensRights25/07/18 07:56 PM
0

I'm going to be a middle school teacher--a science teacher, to be exact. That puts me in an interesting place; there's no denying that there still exists a perception among students that the sciences aren't really very welcoming for girls, and that turns off plenty of them from their passion. By contrast, there are studies like this which indicate that boys need particular encouragement in their early teens when doing academic work, and studies that show that girls suffer more from self-esteem t…
/r/MensRights25/07/18 05:18 PM
1

Considering the fact that India is known for hugely corrupted government and a real rape problem, I'm not sure how well this will go over.
/r/MensRights24/07/18 06:16 PM
3

They're mostly just playing with words for a headline. Consent is the presence of an uncoerced yes. For our purposes, as long as we can be reasonably sure it's not a pressured yes, then it's consent. It's supposed to be enthusiastic because...yeah, duh. Generally, anything less than a 'yes' that sounds like she wants to do it...well, that's kind of going to give off the vibe that she doesn't want to do it, which is then not consent. My general rule is that if a reasonable person would think it's…
/r/MensRights24/07/18 02:45 AM
5

For everyone reading: Generally, whenever someone acts like this, it's because there is no coherent argument they can offer. It's a way for them to come across as sounding right while conceding the discussion in favor of the other person.
/r/MensRights22/07/18 06:28 PM
10

Yeah, /u/TheMythof_Feminism really does seem to be a troll account. Or, at the very least, they're more anti-women than pro-man. I can understand being skeptical of much of feminist culture--that's reasonable. That user blows right past that into actively trying to make us look like we want to oppress women. Men's advocacy is about allowing men agency over their liberation from the standards and norms that hold them back, not about making sure women have it just as bad as we do on that front.
/r/MensRights22/07/18 03:51 PM
12

The reason why is because you need to control for as many variables as you can. This is a pretty small-scale study, which means they need to be pickier. It sounds like they're running multiple studies with this one program, to test the efficacy of the drug in treating PTSD in sexual assault victims or to test varying therapies. With a small sample size, you've got to be selective. If this were hundreds of people, they might make it for both sexes. Instead, it's probably less than 200, which mean…
/r/MensRights22/07/18 05:15 AM
26

To be totally fair here, you don't want to be in a relationship where you suspect your partner of cheating.
/r/MensRights17/07/18 06:05 PM
2

Don't get me wrong, if the child reacts like that, that's solid reason to sit him down and talk to him. Too often, people don't take the child's wishes into account. Even so, they aren't the most important thing. The child's welfare is more important than what makes him happy in the moment. Like I said, plenty of kids would react that way even if their father was abusive. Plenty wouldn't, but it's not conclusive evidence of anything more than that the child is attached--which says only that the …
/r/MensRights16/07/18 09:50 PM
18

Okay, I'm going to step in here for a moment. My mother loves me. She truly, truly does. She'd weep just like that if she lost custody of me when I was a child. She's also entirely unfit to be a mother, and if not for my father's (also deeply flawed) influence, I'd likely have committed suicide. Love doesn't necessarily mean you're fit to have custody. The child loves Dad, and doesn't want to lose him--that, I think, is more telling than the father's tears. Still...at his age, even I'd have crie…
/r/MensRights16/07/18 08:33 PM
1

I...don't really think that's the case. This sub has massively more visibility than MensLib. Are there any other subs that they refuse to let us link to? If they banned linking to all progressive subs, I could see that logic. But to specifically one that is about men? I'm not certain it's to keep us from seeing alternative subs that compete with this one, but...I can't really think of any other logical reason.
/r/MensRights15/07/18 03:58 PM
2

I mean, you like the stated goals of social justice, right? My main problems are with the culture surrounding the community, rather than with the actual stated objectives.
/r/MensRights15/07/18 03:34 PM
2

I was pointing out that the subreddit mods promote free speech, but do not permit us to link to MensLib.
/r/MensRights15/07/18 02:29 PM
8

Not so much feminist views as social justice as a whole. There are problems with the core theory of social justice, though I can't argue that the basic goals are anything but wholesome, or that the problems described actually exist. It really does seem that the main problem that /r/MensRights has with social justice is that it doesn't include them--which I think is a valid criticism against social justice as a framework, beyond just the obvious exclusionary nature of most equitable spaces.
/r/MensRights15/07/18 07:03 AM
2

I'm a semi-regular there, as well as here. It's pretty interesting that you mentioned that sub today, as I just received a month-long ban for making a comment that critically analyzes something that's usually taken for granted. Not making a case against any core tenets (as I believe that the feminist approach, though flawed, is valid when applied equally), just questioning something. The mods are a little more dogmatic than I'd like, but overall they tolerate differing views better than the over…
/r/MensRights15/07/18 04:22 AM
1

I'm sorry that happened to you; don't get me wrong, random ones do happen. I just figure there's nothing I can do about those, so living my life in fear will do no good at all.
/r/MensRights14/07/18 03:37 PM
6

I'm pretty okay with that. Honestly, any time you prosecute a false accusation, it's got to have evidence of malice. Otherwise, there's no evidence that it was even intentional.
/r/MensRights14/07/18 05:44 AM
7

I'll admit, it definitely makes me hesitant to pursue a one-night stand or sleep with someone who has a history of mental illness (and thus potential unpredictability), but not really romance. Rape accusations don't typically come out of the blue. True or false, they aren't usually just random or lack hints. Fortunately, one of my qualifications for romance is, "Isn't a compulsive liar, manipulative, abusive, or otherwise a bad person." False rape claims really are like getting struck by lightni…
/r/MensRights14/07/18 05:23 AM
0

It treats statistical reality as ubiquitous reality. When it comes to biology, we take averages to describe the wild-type. Is that how we ought to organize our society, in your opinion? If so, then that's pretty much the primary point of disagreement.
/r/MensRights03/07/18 03:52 AM
3

I just don't like trying to tell you you're wrong when we aren't even using a common vocabulary. At that point, I'm saying you're wrong for the sake of it and you're responding to criticisms of ideas you might not even hold. The words you used weren't common either among social justice theorists or skeptics, so I couldn't find a concrete exploration of them. I didn't mean any disrespect (though you certainly did). I figure establishing what we're actually talking about is most important. This cl…
/r/MensRights03/07/18 03:33 AM
4

I'll need to you clearly define the following terms, if we want this to be a productive conversation: Biological imperative of man Biological mediocrity of woman Absolute biological tendencies of humanity Since your definitions of those matter, and you're not using any common terminology I've found, so I didn't want to assume what you meant and put words in your mouth.
/r/MensRights03/07/18 02:31 AM
3

You're right. The hypothesis states that there is no mental or social difference that is innate to the male or female. That's been unlikely from the outset. Its opposite is the theory that all the differences between men and women in society are driven by the male and female essential natures. The truth is somewhere in the middle, and it doesn't matter much where exactly it is. We just can't hand-wave away any differences in men and women as being surely rooted in biology, since that dismisses o…
/r/MensRights03/07/18 02:17 AM
1

And yet life is also unfair, because sometimes we do what's best even if it's unfair to us.
/r/MensRights01/07/18 03:35 PM
2

Life is unfair. Sometimes, we do things that are unfair because they are right, best, expedient, or easy.
/r/MensRights01/07/18 03:19 PM
61

To be fair here, I do think you ought to pull your punches when hitting a woman. Not because she's a woman, but because typically you need to hit much less hard when dealing with a woman. Generally, if I hit a dude bigger than me, I fully expect him to clock me so whatever I'm doing is probably worth that hard hit. For a typical woman, physical size doesn't actually make an impression in the same way. Sure, women usually recognize that men are bigger and stronger, but it might not compute that a…
/r/MensRights01/07/18 02:12 PM
1

That's an interesting documentary! I watched it a few years back, and it makes some good points. It doesn't disprove the idea that aspects of gendered behavior are socially-driven, however, though it does invalidate the hypothesis that all gendered behavior is social. Even if the vast majority of gendered behavior is innate...we as a society need to make sure we don't forget those people who don't fit the normative roles, and make sure they aren't excluded from whatever it is they might be truly…
/r/MensRights24/06/18 06:42 PM
-2

I responded to a fairly identical sentiment earlier; you'll find my response there.
/r/MensRights24/06/18 06:17 PM
0

The hard question to answer is which tendencies are biological and which ones are taught. Culture is an abstract and an average, but there's no denying that these averages exist and influence how we act. You and I think killing people for angering us is wrong, even if we're more powerful than they are. Some societies disagree, even today. That's an example of culture 'teaching'. You're right, though, culture isn't a uniform entity. Remember, it's one thing to acknowledge that men and women are s…
/r/MensRights24/06/18 06:16 PM
0

Nature. Nature did this. Sexual dimorphism particularly. The trouble isn't in acknowledging that men and women are physically different. Rather, the hard question to answer is which aspects are physical and which ones are social. We know how you're raised influences how you act, but how much of that is nurture and how much is nature?
/r/MensRights24/06/18 06:13 PM
-14

More that the culture teaches men and women to behave a certain way. Not that men necessarily do the oppressing--that wasn't the best phrasing on my part. Gender oppression is more about how the culture shapes the relationships. In a traditional patriarchal society, men are almost always the ones in places of power and are typically looked to as having more agency than women. I grew up in a fundamentalist Baptist community, and they fit the bill almost perfectly. It's not so much that the men we…
/r/MensRights24/06/18 04:47 PM
-17

men are so fundamentally selfish that they will destroy themselves in an effort to subjugate women More... Think culture vs. people rather than men vs. women. The culture hurts men and it hurts women too.
/r/MensRights24/06/18 04:20 PM
-56

To be fair here, the idea of patriarchy is supposed to also indicate the problems men face. Gender oppression is different from other forms because the oppressor suffers significant negative consequences as well. Nobody's arguing that historically women haven't suffered more--that's a no-brainer. Rather, it's important to recognize that patriarchy is supposed to encompass bad things that men suffer because of gender inequality. Of course, many people would disagree with me...but not most theoris…
/r/MensRights24/06/18 02:58 PM
2

But are you a daddy?
/r/MensRights17/06/18 07:44 PM
2

It's best not to have to use violence. However, it's totally okay to use it when necessary. I've had to warn women off a few times, and fortunately I have a good poker face since I can genuinely look like I'll physically harm them if they make me. It's...interesting, honestly. They suddenly become very aware of my male-ness and my size (I'm not particularly big, but I'm bigger than them usually). Growing up, it never occurred to me that most women live in a world where a huge percentage of the p…
/r/MensRights16/06/18 10:47 PM
22

Plus laughing.
/r/MensRights16/06/18 10:41 PM
16

They're definitely more motivated. Women in our culture are increasingly encouraged to move into male-dominated hobbies, careers, and so on. That same push doesn't exist for men, so businesses have less to gain from it. When men as a culture are taught that it's not only good for them, but good for their whole gender to go into education, nursing, secretary work, knitting, baking, embroidery, and so on, then we'll see those sorts of clubs advertising to men. Of course, this relies on the general…
/r/MensRights16/06/18 10:39 PM
2

Do keep in mind, I'm thinking about child support--that is, obligations that parents have to children. Alimony I think we're in agreement about; the couple are not married and thus quality of life should not rise together. At worst, the payer is responsible for their average pay from the last few years prior to divorce, and it can only fall as the payer's means fall, not raise as the payer's means rise, except to the initial payment level...and certainly shouldn't last longer than five or six ye…
/r/MensRights15/06/18 10:00 PM
2

Only to the level of inflation, though I'd argue a case should be made for people in financial hardship. So if you're barely able to feed yourself, you should only be expected to pay what you can rather than what is necessary. Of course, I also think kids in those circumstances should be qualified for governmental aid. ...and the parents, for that matter.
/r/MensRights15/06/18 07:06 PM
2

In the same way that a child benefits from their parents getting a raise. So not direct proportional increase.
/r/MensRights15/06/18 06:27 PM
1

To be completely fair here, a child's cost of living goes up with inflation. If the point is to take care of the kid, it's only reasonable that more money has to be spent or quality of life has to be lost.
/r/MensRights15/06/18 04:49 PM
10

To be totally fair here, the annual inflation in 2016 was 1.27%, and in 2017 was 2.54%. If you paid $921 in 2016 dollars right now, you'd be paying $956.39. Instead, you're only paying $951 per month. So you're more or less keeping up with inflation. For all my qualms about how fathers are seen as needing to earn rights to their kids from a separate parent (and I do have some), I don't really see a major problem with both parents proportionally equally spending their income on a child. Even if t…
/r/MensRights15/06/18 04:14 PM
5

I'm going to be a middle school teacher in a little over a year. At this point, I've pretty much decided that I'm going to treat any kind of accusations against myself as being like getting struck by lightning. I'll avoid situations that are obviously risky and sketchy (shutting my door with a student in the classroom, for example), but I'm not going to base my life around it. That's no way to live.
/r/MensRights15/06/18 02:46 AM
11

They're reasonably reputable (as such things go)...this is an opinion piece, however. Those are almost universally not worth reading. This is, of course, because most people's opinions on most subjects are uneducated, unimportant, and ineffective.
/r/MensRights15/06/18 12:35 AM
1

To be honest, I just downvoted you because you sent me a DM with a link to your comment. That's a practice I want to discourage, because if everyone does it I'll never get any rest.
/r/MensRights11/06/18 05:13 PM
2

The underlying assumption that justifies what they believe is that fewer women hold power than men because our society creates fewer qualified women because of how girls are raised compared to boys. Basically, what feminists are complaining about usually is that women are groomed from a young age to do things that are different from what boys are trained to do, so the women who end up having talents in those areas never got to foster them in the same way that a man with equal talent did. It's no…
/r/MensRights11/06/18 05:12 PM
2

I was at least listening until she started talking about how men shouldn't hold positions of power. I get saying more women should have power, I even get the emotional response behind hating men. I don't get how those mesh with feminist men refusing to take positions of power.
/r/MensRights11/06/18 06:25 AM
16

I hadn't noticed that...but yeah, it definitely looks that way. Or maybe it's more that he's suppressing what he's feeling and she just is cocky and defiant as hell. That's a slightly more passive version of the face I use when I'm actively trying not to commit murder, and also slightly considering ways to do it without getting caught.
/r/MensRights10/06/18 06:04 AM
1

Basically, when people believe it's appropriate for rape to be part of the punishment, that indicates that it should be legal. I argue that it's an inappropriate form of punishment and should remain illegal.
/r/MensRights06/06/18 11:33 PM
1

No, because currently rape in any form is a crime, and thus warrants counseling services (in most prisons, anyway, shitty though it usually is), as well as extra prison time for the rapist.
/r/MensRights06/06/18 11:29 PM
2

Because then we'd need to consider it part of the punishment...and we can't decide who does and doesn't get raped in prison. Unless you believe every person in prison deserves to be raped for what they did to get there--and that's just assuming that everyone is actually guilty.
/r/MensRights06/06/18 11:13 PM
14

Because nobody should be raped in prison.
/r/MensRights06/06/18 10:51 PM
20

Not to mention several years with that on her background check. A crime and a few months in prison immediately make her a no-hire for a lot of decent jobs, and the ones that will take an ex-con typically have men hiring...and frankly, I don't know a single man who would hire a woman who had that on her rap sheet. Like, I'd legitimately hire a repeat thief first. That can hurt your business, but the crime she committed hits you right at home. I'd gladly just watch my tills a little more closely.
/r/MensRights06/06/18 10:50 PM
-3

It depends on what your views of feminism are. The core ideology is sound, as is the core goal. My primary problem with many presenters is that they misrepresent many of the facts they use. Yes, on average men make significantly more money than women...but many people use that statistic to show that women are habitually and severely underpaid. It's not a signifier of that, but rather of the fact that our culture teaches men that they have to provide and women that they have to be nurturers first…
/r/MensRights06/06/18 10:32 PM
3

I don't doubt the data exists...which is why the choice to use this data is questionable. I've got not-insignificant training in statistics and methodology; when old sociological data is presented, and when it's presented as very specific statements rather than whole cases...well, it sets off alarm bells in my head. I'm not saying that this data is wrong or that the image is an attempt at deception--only that the data is outdated and the image could be the result of nit-picking statistics to fin…
/r/MensRights04/06/18 04:44 PM
6

He's right about the fact that the data's use is very limited. You can use it to specifically say that fatherless homes 40 years ago were home to more troubled children. It only allows for some extrapolation to today; anything more substantial than that would need data from the last ten years or so.
/r/MensRights04/06/18 03:19 PM
5

That's a fair point. Maybe a lawyer would be a better option, if available.
/r/MensRights03/06/18 04:59 PM
11

Don't follow the suing advice. That's secondary to not going to jail. Plus, what she's done is a criminal offense, not a civil one--it's not up to you to sue. Also, you're in Japan, so any legal advice here is total bullshit, unless the person specifies they're from Japan. Remember you're not at home, and things work differently. Use your own discretion. Other than that, this guy's got it right.
/r/MensRights03/06/18 02:37 PM
29

Calm down, take a breath. No, seriously--take a breath. Right now. Okay, good. So, first thing's first. You're not sober right now. No, you're not. Trust me. Your judgement is impaired. Get lots of water and go to bed. Don't contact her anymore, and don't block her; you want all the messages she sends. She's upset and you can use them to prove your case. Read the rest of this tomorrow. You're in Japan, so a lot of advice I could give you might not be ideal. Contact the US embassy if you can, esp…
/r/MensRights03/06/18 02:30 PM
2

I hate to say it, but I'll give you the last word. Go ahead, take it. I dare you.
/r/MensRights27/05/18 11:48 PM
2

everyone knows scientist never use statistics and studies I did, though.
/r/MensRights27/05/18 11:45 PM
2

I am a skeptic, yes. That's what it means to be a scientist--without evidence, I can't believe something. Men have higher IQs than women, yes. IQ is also an incomplete measurement of intelligence. That means that we can't say men are smarter than women, only that they're, on average, better at formal logic. And that's not even enough to say it's tied in with biology--we just know that there's sexual dimorphism in the brain, and that men score higher on a certain test. The brain differences could…
/r/MensRights27/05/18 11:10 PM
1

If you're good at something you gravitate towards it, using that and using the fact that a high IQ is very helpful for a high-success career I can pretty confidently say it is a good predictor of a high-success career. Again, that's a hypothesis, and not a very well-substantiated one. You can say that it might be a good predictor. Without any kind of research done into that, it's just a chain of logic that relies on a lot of things you can't possibly derive from logic and the facts you've presen…
/r/MensRights27/05/18 10:44 PM
1

You're just a skeptic, what do you want?? I don't think this is gonna go anywhere, for fuck sakes, nothing is ever certain, doesn't mean nothing is ever true. I mean, I'm not ruling out the possibility that you're 100% right. It's entirely possible. The evidence you've presented just doesn't rise to the level of 'well-evidenced', much less 'fact'. It's solidly in the realm of 'well, it's a valid hypothesis'. I'm in the field of biology--we aren't known for being all that strict on our standards …
/r/MensRights27/05/18 08:52 PM
1

I'm not sure IQ predicts jobs; for that, you'd need to know what percentage of people at a given IQ are in each job. It could be that a high IQ makes it far easier to get into a successful STEM career, but does that necessarily mean that a significant percentage of high-IQ people are in those fields? That's a number I'm having a little trouble finding--you can't assume IQ is a significant indicator of success unless you can say that a large percentage of the overall high-IQ population is in succ…
/r/MensRights27/05/18 07:49 PM
1

Also, that doesn't change the FACT that men are smarter. That's the trouble--the evidence doesn't support that conclusion. It correlates with jobs in the STEM field, sure, but that doesn't directly indicate intelligence. Speaking from some significant experience in STEM, even physicists and chemists aren't 'smarter' than most folks. They're usually better at mathematics, which is what IQ predicts. People with a higher IQ are typically better at formal logic, whether numerical or conceptual. See …
/r/MensRights27/05/18 06:57 PM
1

Basically, the idea behind evolution is that the one who has the most babies wins. Thus, in non-monogamous species, the male who can have the most babies wins. Females get to have babies no matter what; they're the 'choosers', since they're the ones with the biological machinery and the most resources invested (food, time, opportunity cost, lack of mobility, etc.). However, they can only have one group of offspring at a time. By contrast, males are able to impregnate as many females as they can …
/r/MensRights27/05/18 06:15 PM
1

So, I hate to say it, but /u/OnTheSlope is right on this one. Sexual dimorphism specifically exists when there is unequal selection for a trait among the sexes of a species. For example, we know men are larger on average. That's sexual dimorphism. In this case, most modern evolutionary biologists agree that it's because of a bit of an 'arms race' between males. The bigger male gets the woman, pretty much. That's the driver of sexual dimorphism in very nearly every species in which males are larg…
/r/MensRights27/05/18 01:59 PM
2

Disclaimer: I'm going off into speculation now, so nothing I say has any weight beyond whatever grain of salt you want to toss at it. The primary difference between white matter and gray matter is that white matter is more long fiber neurons (think highways, not local streets). That's consistent with the findings that women have more connectivity in their default mode network (again highway analogy). The place where they tested white matter was in specific white matter ducts, so it's not that th…
/r/MensRights25/05/18 02:09 AM
5

The white matter is white because of myelin surrounding the nerve fibers. It's kind of like insulation wrapping around the nerve. It's not a bad thing, typically. Having excessive white matter is known to correlate with more criminal behavior (IIRC), but I don't think that the dimorphic variance is quite to the same degree. More likely, whatever physiological conditions lead to greater risk of criminality just also lead to greater white matter in the brain. Like how both viruses and bacterial in…
/r/MensRights25/05/18 02:00 AM
4

Do you have any data on the normal curve for male and female IQs? Since that would influence my reply a bit, depending on where the curve is for women. You may be on to something, if the curve's dropoff for women is beneath the STEM 'ideal'. Still, I've always thought that the SD wasn't that much smaller for women, only by a relatively small amount consistent with far more extreme outliers being men.
/r/MensRights24/05/18 07:02 PM
25

That's true, yes, though I'd caution against using IQ variance as a reasoning for STEM participation rates. IQ doesn't necessarily lead to a better fitness for the STEM fields, nor does it indicate intelligence, despite the name. IQ is more like...a speed-test for a computer. How many logic puzzles can you solve in an hour? That sort of thing. Speaking from some experience, the STEM fields don't really rely on that quite as much as you might think. It's more about how well you can solve a logic …
/r/MensRights24/05/18 06:38 PM
211

I'm a bio major, so I've got a bit of background in this area and I'll read over the paper and see if I can interpret it so you can avoid trusting some random journalist's generic description. Remember, I'm a junior in college and my greatest education in this field comes from a physiology class that was geared toward premed students; so I know the basics, but I am not an expert. You're welcome to ask me any questions you'd like, and I'll do my best to answer them, but please keep in mind that I…
/r/MensRights24/05/18 04:59 PM
1

We are the Borg. Your biological and technological distinctiveness will be added to our own. Resistance is futile. I mean... uh, I disagree with you, fellow meatbag.
/r/MensRights24/05/18 03:56 PM
0

I actually want people to see our conversation, since it's meant to push back against the idea that the OP should be discounted on account of their opinion of the sub's often-negative tone, since the opinion isn't entirely invalid.
/r/MensRights24/05/18 03:53 PM
7

It's only tone policing if you try to force a tone on someone. I'm just observing that the tone has changed, and that I think it's for the worse. Everybody has to vent sometimes, but at this point it's nonconstructive.
/r/MensRights24/05/18 03:45 PM
2

I've been on this sub for years; in my experience the sub's tone has obviously changed. You never see constructive conversation, only whining. Not that there's nothing to whine about, but...really, this sub used to be about men's rights and moving toward equality, rather than just about being unhappy about all the inequality.
/r/MensRights24/05/18 03:42 PM
7

That's the kicker here--we need to have defined what 'consent' is, since the opinion on that varies hugely depending on who you're talking to.
/r/MensRights23/05/18 09:05 PM
3

Can you source that for me?
/r/MensRights23/05/18 09:03 PM
1

Bear in mind, an amendment actually supersedes any pre-existing text.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 07:52 AM
26

I'd personally prefer to not have to sign up for the draft. Then again, I'd dodge, so...yeah. Except in the case of actual invasion of the US, that is. I'm not going to go kill a bunch of other poor mooks like me on foreign soil where we're fighting a proxy war with someone who we can't actually fight personally against.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 07:50 AM
4

Do you have way more men than women? From a strictly logistical perspective, businesses need more bathrooms per woman per hour than they do for men. Men pee less often, have more control over urinary function, and can do it more rapidly. Add a few more toilets, sure, but women just kind of have an edge on the shitting side of things simply because they can't use urinals.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 07:42 PM
5

most child murderers being women Can you source that for me? I'm actually pretty curious about this now. I initially misread it as 'child molesters' and was...skeptical, to say the least. Now, I can kinda see murder.
/r/MensRights04/05/18 06:29 PM
2

The main reason people care whether or not women are going into coding is because it says something about society that it's uneven. I'm going into education and I'll be vastly outnumbered by women; it's not because women are somehow naturally more nurturing and better with kids, but rather because of how men are raised in our society. It's the same deal with computer science. That's why they have a problem with it. How they handle that problem might need some work, but it's not an irrational pos…
/r/MensRights27/04/18 11:55 AM
4

It's like murder. Intent and planning make the crime worse. And depending on the state and country, this could be lighter than the sex with a minor charge. I'm not a lawyer or a sex crimes lawyer, though.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 03:08 PM
2

If they're in their 20s, it's not rare for a quadriplegic to live twenty years. Maybe even 30 or 40, though I'd guess 30 is the most likely number. That's basically a lifetime, if you're 20. By the end you're 50, your career prospects are gone, family prospects are gone, friends...
/r/MensRights20/04/18 11:42 AM
3

It's a bad thing to do, certainly, but that one decision doesn't make you a bad person.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 09:33 PM
8

In my opinion, yeah. You don't have to be a bad person to do something immoral.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 09:33 PM
10

You're not wrong; I'm pretty solid on the fact that it's not moral, what she did. Still, humans are contradictory beings. I acknowledge that eating factory-raised animals is my greatest contribution to methane production and animal cruelty, and that the most moral course is to not eat meat. Yet I do. As much as I wish I didn't, I really do think that selfishness would extend to a situation like this, too. For me, if no one else.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 08:04 PM
50

Having that as a moral standard is good...but could you do it every single day? Staying in every day, giving sponge baths, feeding them, changing their diaper, being unable to leave even for a day. That's a very, very hard life. I've seen what that entails--and while I'd certainly try, I know I'd be unable to do it long-term.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 07:50 PM
27

That's my point. I'm sure lots of people would try, myself included, but I'm not sure I could do it for a lifetime.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 07:21 PM
14

If that's the bar for decency, I expect that few people reach it.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 07:20 PM
545

I can't really throw stones at her. I'd feel terrible, but I don't think I could care for a quadriplegic wife for decades. Is it selfish and immoral? Absolutely. How many people could do better, though?
/r/MensRights19/04/18 05:01 PM
2

More that those same people hold consent in sex as being absolutely sacred. Rightfully so, if you ask me.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 08:49 PM
1

I'm...not sure that anyone does. Lots of people believe bad shit, but...I can honestly say I've never seen online or in person anybody or any ideology that even leans close to something like this.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 08:38 PM
0

You kinda just did the exact same thing, trying to make a discussion that affects both be something for only one group. It's that sort of tribalism that is the reason for so, so much suffering.
/r/MensRights03/04/18 09:27 PM
1

In my experience, there are more specifications in the female code.
/r/MensRights03/04/18 07:30 PM
-15

They're unacceptable for boys because boys are taught they're feminine. Boys used to wear those in public, and now it's more that they're not fashionable, rather than being somehow indecent. Frankly, most styles girls wear in public aren't indecent. I think guys should have more fashion styles and the lack of it is definitely rooted in the attitude that men are not supposed to be as sexual as women, but you have to remember that every kind of inequality is a duality. Women have to be caretakers?…
/r/MensRights03/04/18 04:52 PM
-4

Typically those are either religious or charter, though, and both try to set a different tone than public school. If public school required a professional-looking outfit, I could see your point. Some do, of course, and those I'll acknowledge as having a different purpose.
/r/MensRights03/04/18 04:14 PM
-20

While you're right, see my other comment.
/r/MensRights03/04/18 02:43 PM
-56

True enough. Still, I'd argue that the dress code is mostly due to trying to get girls to dress a certain way, in the first place. And the sagging pants is more of an example of bias against typical "black style," especially against black men due to their being seen as more of a threat.
/r/MensRights03/04/18 02:41 PM
-69

To be totally fair here, girls have a much more strict dress code than boys, even at public school. It's unreasonably strict, and rooted in our society's odd relationship to sexuality. We want girls to suppress their sexuality while at the same time trying to turn them into sexual objects. Boys are taught from a young age to idolize that, and that the pursuit of sexual objects defines them as men. I really don't see anything wrong with saying that the whole dress code situation should change and…
/r/MensRights03/04/18 02:31 PM
4

Can you source the lesbian being the most violent thing? It wouldn't shock me, but I'm actually really interested in that, since I've never heard it.
/r/MensRights29/03/18 05:02 PM
2

Bro, we want men to have equal rights to women. That's, like, the whole point of men's rights. You're the equivalent of a white person who wants "the good old days" of owning slaves or something. Seriously, if you want to talk, I'll listen. This kind of mindset is terrible for you and does nothing but hurt you.
/r/MensRights29/03/18 04:49 PM
13

Damn... That's disgusting. You can tell that OP was just looking for people to affirm the opinion that the man is a pedophile. I really do hate people like that. That being said, she has a point. He should ask before coming over, and it's kind of sketchy that he doesn't. Yes, she should be careful. Hell, I'm even okay with not letting him see the kid without supervision, simply because I think it's a good choice until the kid is old enough to talk and be taught to tell their parents when somethi…
/r/MensRights25/03/18 03:57 AM
2

She's advocating for equality--your problem is that she also considers herself a feminist. Be pro-equality in all things, rather than anti-feminist. There are enough times you'll be at odds with modern feminist culture that you shouldn't bother to seek it out in the few times you agree with them.
/r/MensRights25/03/18 03:00 AM
7

She's advocating for equality--your problem is that she also considers herself a feminist. Be pro-equality in all things, rather than anti-feminist. There are enough times you'll be at odds with modern feminist culture that you shouldn't bother to seek it out in the few times you agree with them.
/r/MensRights25/03/18 02:59 AM
1

Thank you. Feminism can be a force for good in the world. It was in the past and it can be in the present. It's just...yeah, they need to have your attitudes. Pay no mind to the bitter people replying to you--they are far more against feminism than they are for equality.
/r/MensRights25/03/18 02:58 AM
14

I mean, there exists a pill quite a lot like female contraceptive...in that the side effects are quite similar. Personally I wouldn't take it--flip side, I also wouldn't expect a woman to take it. I'll use a damn rubber.
/r/MensRights19/03/18 05:35 AM
0

Repressed memories are a thing. Especially as a child.
/r/MensRights18/03/18 03:36 PM
2

It could be she was drugged or got pass out drunk and can't say for certain.
/r/MensRights18/03/18 03:36 PM
16

I mean, I'm a proud coward. I recall one girl was lightly slapping most of the guys in the room. Lightly as in not a brutal backhand, but it still hurt, at least from everyone else's reactions. She was picking on one guy in particular, and he just took it. She came up to me to do it and I had to put on the most straight-serious face I had so I could say, "Do it, and I'll slap you back." She knew me well enough to know I typically don't lie about things like that, and she just laughed nervously, …
/r/MensRights13/03/18 07:38 PM
13

Doesn't work like that, sadly. My mom was emotionally abusive, and while I feel I would have been well within my moral rights to lay into her with my fists, it's still not a crime to be a total cunt.
/r/MensRights13/03/18 07:36 PM
47

Honestly, I'd be fine with that general treatment toward first-time assault. You're responsible for their medical treatment for anything conceivably related to the assault, including chronic issues, you need to do roughly 80 hours of community service, and you have to give a formal, written and spoken apology.
/r/MensRights13/03/18 07:35 PM
0

In short, you agree that this was handled correctly. Sure, it might not have been handled if this were a man involved...but when that happens, just make lots of noise about how it should be handled this way, rather than making a case that women ought to be hurt so this will get fixed faster. Try for a society that treats both equally, and not in the bad way.
/r/MensRights13/03/18 07:16 PM
10

Exactly--criminals have any number of motivations. Sure, it's definitely about power sometimes...but it could also be the closest someone has to being considered attractive, or a mix of sexual repression and inability to express their sexuality in appropriate ways.
/r/MensRights13/03/18 01:06 PM
29

This is how these things should be handled. I'm all for men's advocacy, but I don't want women to be mistreated just because men are. I'd greatly prefer equality through bringing others up, rather than dragging them down.
/r/MensRights13/03/18 01:04 PM
1

So--feminism's mission statement basically amounts to the following: Equal treatment for everyone is good, and women are generally more negatively-treated than men. Right there, pretty much everyone on this sub agrees with half of that. Equal treatment for everyone is good. Women are at least sometimes treated worse than men, though it's a matter of debate here as to how they're treated in comparison to men, overall. I'd argue that it doesn't matter. That's a pragmatist's way of looking at socia…
/r/MensRights10/03/18 07:30 PM
5

To clarify, you can do it. Should you? No, because there are plenty of ways they can make your life difficult besides just shooting you.
/r/MensRights07/03/18 06:52 AM
4

wedding crashers - man awakes to find that he is tied down to a bed, and is raped by a woman Wait... I thought he was tied down and almost-raped by the creepy emo kid?
/r/MensRights07/03/18 06:46 AM
3

wedding crashers I watched that movie about a year ago, and I don't actually remember that. Can you refresh my memory? I remember the dude being a bit creepy in terms of attachment and maybe a few dicks being grabbed at a gay fetish sex club thing.
/r/MensRights07/03/18 06:45 AM
5

I mean, I'd be okay with being designated as a leader in society. Then again, I also think I'd be good at it unlike the majority of people as a whole, to say nothing of those who happen to look like I do.
/r/MensRights28/02/18 11:50 PM
2

Why?
/r/MensRights20/02/18 04:34 AM
31

For me, that quote means, "We don't even have a justification for why we do it other than it's what culture and parents want." At least the ladies get a decent bullshit excuse.
/r/MensRights12/01/18 06:59 AM
18

No, that's the stated goal of the sub. Like how feminism's goal (the official stance) is to ensure women have equal rights. Some feminists want to actively push women above men, right? The tricky thing with activist groups is that they are more of a spectrum. You can't have lots of people believing in the exact same thing; ask any two random Christians about doctrine and they'll disagree on many points. Hell, ask any two of the same denomination and they'll still disagree on a surprising number …
/r/MensRights11/01/18 10:36 PM
16

Reports are anonymous, I think. Which is good--I sometimes report things I think violate the rules, yet I'm pretty sure match up with the popular sentiment of the sub.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 09:49 PM
28

Having done a little work with advanced dementia patients, I honestly don't think I'd blame them for anything short of killing somebody. Would I stop them? Absolutely, but in the same way I'd stop a toddler from throwing a tantrum. It's not their fault, however exasperating it may be.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 08:38 AM
7

I mean, if you've got dementia, I think you get a bit of a pass in terms of it counting against your character. Is it appropriate? No, but if you've got advanced Alzheimer's and you cuss me out because your mind is slipping, your inhibitions are degraded, and you're scared because you're no longer you... Well, that's even less blameworthy than when a twelve-year-old cusses you out--and that doesn't count, because your brain is literally lacking the majority of the part of the brain that deals wi…
/r/MensRights11/01/18 08:35 AM
6

That...sounds better, to me. I mean, I like the US version better.
/r/MensRights03/01/18 11:40 PM
11

Basically, the goal is to make it so people who are functionally identical in a job except for their sex make the same amount of money. It's basically what the US does already. The wage gap is only a thing in the sense that some jobs are more filled with men or women, and the higher-paying ones often have more men. It's not that men make more than women for the same work, but that men are often in work that, across the board, pays higher than the jobs that women tend to be the majority in.
/r/MensRights03/01/18 11:39 PM
9

I mention the Rochdale child sex abuse ring every single time I can. The police were scared to properly investigate people they had reason to believe were raping children. The reason for this was because this particular ring had many people of racial minorities in them, so they were overlooked because the police didn't want to risk looking racist for following up on concerns that many people had. I say this to point out that police can often be swayed by public opinion. The reality of the situat…
/r/MensRights03/01/18 03:43 AM
200

It basically means you're willing to use a child as a tool. If that can be demonstrated in a court of law, you definitely shouldn't have custody.
/r/MensRights01/01/18 03:20 PM
2

Plus, if you’re an expert in a field, you can get paid well without having to manage a classroom and deal with a group of teenagers that have decided to make your job a living hell. That's the problem. To be a teacher, you give up the ability to be an expert in most any field except teaching. I'm getting a BS in biology with a concentration in secondary education--that means I may be able to work in industry, but academia will be out of my reach.
/r/MensRights29/12/17 07:03 AM
1

And on top of all this, just think of how much worse it will be when the current SJW generation become teachers and administrators. If it helps, I'm...not at all one of those and want to go into teaching and/or administration.
/r/MensRights29/12/17 07:02 AM
2

As much as I really hate how society assumes all accusations are gospel, I think I prefer that to the government being able to go, "We arrested this person." And then nothing happens if you hang out there for a few months. Maybe it can be one of those 'if you waive the right' things?
/r/MensRights19/12/17 05:00 AM
6

To be totally fair here, most magazines appeal far, far more to women than to men.
/r/MensRights13/12/17 06:13 AM
1

To be totally fair here, I don't really mind most of those. I'm objectively stronger than most women I deal with on a daily basis, so if they need something that's legitimately too heavy lifted, then I'll do it without too much bitching. Fixing shit's actually fun for me, since I'm a natural tinkerer, and high shelves...I mean, c'mon, it's a given if you're taller. Then again, I typically expect people to help me in return, and usually they do. As long as it's not just entitlement (which I oppos…
/r/MensRights11/12/17 09:27 PM
2

Thank you for sharing! I've been coming to realize I'd actually like to work with kids. They tend to like me, and most aren't intimidated by me like they are with some other men. Then again, I'm college age so that might have something to do with it.
/r/MensRights09/12/17 05:25 AM
2

Quick question--how does a male work at a women's shelter? I don't know, but I'd have thought there would be a bit of a barrier there. Then again, I also think there's a barrier to men in education and working with kids, so there's that.
/r/MensRights09/12/17 03:30 AM
6

You know, every single time I think of leaving the US, I realize that pretty much every other country that looks worth going to has problems just like we do...and honestly, paying a fuckton more for healthcare isn't as awful a trade as I might otherwise say it is.
/r/MensRights09/12/17 03:29 AM
1

They actually changed it, I think. Which makes sense--I mean, all they have is their PR.
/r/MensRights14/11/17 03:14 AM
3

And that's part of the problem, sadly. It's a weakness in their arguments and makes them prone to flawed beliefs--if we believe the right things through wrong thinking, then we're fundamentally no different and nobody will be convinced by us.
/r/MensRights07/11/17 01:08 AM
8

Well. I've been looking for something like this--my dad still thinks circumcision is a good choice for health benefits. Doing God's work, my son.
/r/MensRights06/11/17 04:05 PM
4

It's not that the medical procedure is bad--it's that the child can't object and there is no need for it to happen. Think about, say, slicing off the pinky toe. No major ill effects, and let's say that, somehow, it prevents certain foot disorders late in life. Should we cut the pinky toes off of our kids? No, of course not! It's not necessary, and the child has a right not to have its body altered unnecessarily without its consent. Contrast that with, say, the fact that my tear ducts needed surg…
/r/MensRights06/11/17 04:02 PM
24

That's the trouble. Nobody's going to be convinced by non-peer-reviewed information. We need to push for more studies, not listen to ones that are already dead. This sort of thing will do nothing but give ammunition. Logical or not, it's impractical.
/r/MensRights06/11/17 03:57 PM
5

To be fair here, you don't need a medical degree to interpret (and even judge) medical research. Any basic science degree would give you the skills you need, you just need to understand the implications and basic principles addressed in the study. As a biology student, I can competently discuss a chemistry paper...though it will take longer to properly understand.
/r/MensRights06/11/17 03:56 PM
1

I'd argue that you could only study it as it relates to mental health. Anything else is a bit outside their field of expertise. Leave gun violence to the sociologists. If anything, they've got more of an internal bias due to the strong left lean of sociology's scientific culture.
/r/MensRights06/11/17 03:53 PM
4

For me, the big tipping point is that, even when everyone has a gun, most fights never end with guns drawn. Everybody knows that's how you get shot, so nobody does it, excepting criminals and desperate people. So yeah, it's more dangerous, but...well, I personally think it's worth the sacrifice.
/r/MensRights06/11/17 03:51 PM
6

Historically, scientists have done some pretty fucked up shit. They're very careful about medical ethics now to avoid unethical human experimentation. Speaking as someone wanting to go into research, I want to be very careful in my ethics, because historically true evil has been done in the name of knowledge. Basically, the idea is that something like circumcision is unnecessary and painful...and thus fits the criteria for unethical human experimentation when a scientist wants to do research on …
/r/MensRights06/11/17 03:48 PM
1

It might just be a matter of perspective, then. Things I value as essential might be undesirable to them, and vice versa. Despite a similar looking culture, Europe's mindset is shaped by WW2 and the subsequent destruction they had to overcome.
/r/MensRights03/11/17 01:19 PM
21

This is why I can't live abroad. For all the problems the US has, every time I look at other countries I decide I'd rather have my current problems than theirs.
/r/MensRights02/11/17 02:00 PM
1

Exactly. There are plenty of reasons to criticize modern feminism without throwing women's rights under the bus.
/r/MensRights01/11/17 06:12 PM
16

To be fair here, everything stated in the OP is true. Reporting makes a difference...but a 90% difference? I believe that there's a bias against men in some aspects of our society, but I'm not willing to believe that men and women are totally equal on the point of murders.
/r/MensRights26/10/17 01:49 AM
2

a "false accuser list" would be a very bad road to go down. I agree...but then, I also think a "sexual criminal list" is also a very bad road to go down.
/r/MensRights21/10/17 03:32 PM
2

At that point we'd be debating whether the death penalty is a good idea overall.
/r/MensRights15/10/17 06:02 AM
1

I mean, I'm pretty okay with no death penalty. Sure, it makes me feel better for her to be dead...but we'll inevitably kill someone who doesn't deserve it. I'd rather waste billions on that principle than accept that our society might kill people who don't deserve it.
/r/MensRights15/10/17 05:19 AM
1

I know child molesters suffer badly in men's prisons, but do child murderers get the same treatment in women's prisons? I'd love to know, but statistically the chances of coming across someone who is female, an ex con, uses the internet, and looks at /r/mensrights?
/r/MensRights15/10/17 05:18 AM
3

Life's not fair. But...really, does it matter? It's 33 years; she'll be dead or near enough when she gets out. At that point, the difference between life and death is negligible. If given the option, I'm not certain I'd pick life.
/r/MensRights15/10/17 05:17 AM
2

I'd rather everyone be anonymous than everyone be made public... Actually, nevermind. I'd rather deal with doxxing than have to just trust that the government isn't hushing up a thousand kangaroo courts.
/r/MensRights15/10/17 05:16 AM
1

Yeeah... I'd seriously offer to adopt the kid right there, if I was in even the remotest way able to support a kid. No child deserves that kind of parent. Sadly, that might just make the child's life worse, having the mother realize that a near-stranger cares more than his own mother.
/r/MensRights15/10/17 05:15 AM
2

Why not? Sometimes, mental illness can cause people to do awful things. Then again, I also think people with mental illnesses are 100% responsible for their actions, just like people who drink or do drugs. Impaired mental state doesn't relieve one from responsibility. Whether she was just evil or just sick, she murdered a child and ought to be separated from society for the good of all of us.
/r/MensRights15/10/17 05:12 AM
2

The fact that twelve year olds think of that shit...when I was twelve I got my head shaved because fuck waiting for my short wet hair to dry.
/r/MensRights07/10/17 03:12 PM
3

If academia has taught me anything, it's that there WILL be a study based on almost every obscure aspect of society. Want a study on gay black single men parenting foreign adopted chinese orphans in America? It very well might exist. Definitely ones on single gay dads foreign adopting.
/r/MensRights07/10/17 03:11 PM
0

Is it morally wrong? Yes. Assault? I'd say so. ...but by any sensible definition, its not rape. Not any more than stabbing someone in the vagina with a knife is rape. The sucking on penis thing...Given the actual purpose, it more qualifies as part of the assault rather than rape or sexual assault.
/r/MensRights08/09/17 01:59 PM
7

This isn't one. But they are funny. Some people wallow in horror, others laugh because the only other option is insanity.
/r/MensRights30/08/17 04:29 AM
1

...Quick off-topic question. What did he find that was so damn important? I watched it, and must have totally missed whatever it was.
/r/MensRights16/08/17 11:35 PM
1

And if we DO call it sexist, lets be honest, its sexist against both men and women. Why men? How about the scene where Theon's cock gets cut off? It's even used as a joke. To be totally fair here, that's just the kind of person Ramsay was. I started laughing maniacally at seeing him just calmly slicing into a sausage...but then, I'd read the books and knew it wasn't actually his penis.
/r/MensRights16/08/17 09:14 PM
2

While it's definitely within your rights to report--indeed, it's totally justified--do be aware that they likely will do nothing. If a woman waited three years to report, they might question the guy and give him some unkind treatment, but in the end they could do nothing since all the evidence is gone. With a woman, chances are it'll end with the report being filed.
/r/MensRights01/08/17 07:11 PM
6

I think people would be more offended if the only black people present in the movie were manual laborers and cannon fodder.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 04:52 PM
1

I'm not saying it won't happen or even that it's unlikely. Personally, I agree that she's probably going to get off fairly lightly. Still, complaining about it as if it's evidence is...premature. Once she gets off with probation, then use it as evidence. Until then, it's not worth talking about since it's just another case of someone doing something fucked up. It's not blindness to save your words for a better time any more than it's ignorance not to say everything you know.
/r/MensRights12/07/17 05:25 AM
1

It's not blindness to reserve judgement until someone actually does something wrong. Whether it will happen or not is irrelevant. Bringing it up before it happens just hurts the movement as a whole. There's enough unfairness in the world to use as talking points...let this one keep for a little while so it will ferment a bit.
/r/MensRights12/07/17 03:23 AM
1

I didn't choose, I had a medical problem that prevented me from being circumcised until then. It was my parents choice, not mine. I didn't know what was happening until it was finished.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 08:56 PM
1

Of course it hurts, but I got mine done when I was seven. I clearly remember it and it didn't hurt that badly at all.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 08:24 PM
1

It's actually not all that bad. Plus, you can always have it done whenever you want...but if it's done early, and you decide you don't want it, then it can't really be fixed to the way it would have been.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 08:05 PM
1

Still, it's rather nice to get to pick for yourself. That's the key issue. You can be circumcised if you want. It's okay and fine. Just you ought to be old enough to have a say in it
/r/MensRights09/07/17 07:16 PM
1

Interesting points you've made. I'm at a ball game right now, but I'd love to discuss this with you, since I'm a sucker for epistemology. !Remindme 5 hours
/r/MensRights04/07/17 01:21 AM
2

Why is it inaccurate?
/r/MensRights03/07/17 09:55 PM
5

Is there a list of the subs that ban people based on who they subscribe to? It would be nice to preemptively block them. It's not a mindset I want to support with my presence.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 10:42 PM
5

Please don't hurt cheese this way. It doesn't deserve to be treated like that.
/r/MensRights25/06/17 03:04 AM
0

I actually prefer them to Subway's, because Subway tastes fake. And we don't have any other sub places in my area. x.x
/r/MensRights25/06/17 03:03 AM
35

To be fair here, I don't mind sexist jokes one way or the other. They can be funny. This one was just kind of crass, but overall I don't mind jokes about things people get all uptight about...humor is the great equalizer. Or was that handguns? I'm not sure.
/r/MensRights25/06/17 03:02 AM
2

We don't know. Obviously women are more trusted with kids...but to the point that female child molesters make up something like 5% of the demographic? I'm sure the gap would be much narrower, but would it be even remotely close to 50-50? We don't know.
/r/MensRights17/06/17 02:41 AM
-5

To be totally fair here, a massive proportion of convicted child molesters are white men. Speaking as a white man, it really sucks to know that I fit the demographic perfectly. Sure, I'm positive that there are a lot of women child molesters who are just never caught, not to mention many minorities often have a different culture where that sort of thing can go unnoticed more easily, but still.
/r/MensRights17/06/17 02:01 AM
3

The only reason I don't like this plan is because then I'll have to wait in line too. Then again, I suppose it's fair... All good things must come to an end, y'know?
/r/MensRights17/06/17 01:59 AM
1

I'm glad I'm a bit of a nonconformist. Having the complete moral high ground when going against society's norms is a lot of fun.
/r/MensRights17/06/17 01:58 AM
2

At that point you just ask to speak with a manager and ask where you can change your daughter's diaper. If the only table is in a women's room, ask if you can go in there and change her diaper. If told no, as you likely would be, ask the manager to accompany you. All else fails, imply you find the men's room counter an acceptable place to do this, after you clean it off a bit.
/r/MensRights17/06/17 01:56 AM
-5

To be fair here, it's still a degree. I'm a biology major--my degree will mean nothing more than a music degree. Mine will pay me more, but that doesn't make it a better degree, just better at making money. And not much better, sadly for me. :(
/r/MensRights03/06/17 12:09 AM
19

So the kid's fucked up for life, sexually. Probably, at least. Imagine what that would do to a little girl, raised from her first memories to accept that sexual behavior was good and fun. Now flip it--it's identical to a little boy. Imagine the difficulties, adjusting back. Not to mention feeling raped long, long after the fact, once he realizes what was done. EDIT: Not that sex isn't good and fun. It is. A lot. But...well, preferably in private and with someone you love or at least have a thing…
/r/MensRights02/06/17 01:17 AM
4

I kind of wish these sorts of people were that weak and/or mentally incompetent. Then we could at least justify protecting them under laws prohibiting abuse of mentally handicapped individuals.
/r/MensRights02/06/17 01:13 AM
1

It's even more ridiculous considering that mothers are the ones who abuse their children more than fathers do. Do you have a source for this? I'm not attacking--this is genuinely new information and I'd love to have it in my list of, "See? Men aren't rapist pedophile monsters," facts.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 02:21 AM
1

Did you get actual film at the time? You could have her rekt in court if you do. Maybe ask for a publicly filmed apology for YouTube, as well? Or in front of her church, perhaps.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 02:17 AM
6

In my opinion, this is why more and more men aren't getting married or looking for serious relationships. It makes us vulnerable--we know we're at a disadvantage, and thus just avoid it entirely. The system is in our favor in many ways, but when it comes to women and families and sexual matters the women have a great advantage over us. As a result, many just choose to avoid those places where we're at a disadvantage.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 04:03 AM
1

Sending them to juvie or putting them through the sex offender registry is unnecessary--kids shouldn't be put on it at all. Rather, they ought to be put into therapy, have to do community service, and have social services heavily involved in their lives and the lives of their families. That's a fair response to a child sexually assaulting another child, whatever sexes are involved. The victim knows the criminals are being properly handled (unlike so many other sorts of misbehavior at that age), …
/r/MensRights10/05/17 03:59 AM
16

Because it's an entertaining joke.
/r/MensRights22/04/17 08:04 PM
262

I once saw a dude sitting on a packed bus I was on, keeping his bag right on the seat beside him. Since I had a backpack and a fairly large package, I put my package down, took off my backpack, and put them beside that chair. I then proceeded to lift his backpack up, sit down, and keep the pack on my lap. I smiled at him, he glared at me. I offered his bag, he angrily took it. I settled in happily.
/r/MensRights20/04/17 03:41 AM
3

A person like that does not deserve to teach.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 04:14 PM
5

I'm very sorry, but the other guy who replied to this burned you worse than they do in the Middle East with battery acid.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 04:14 PM
2

I also said blacktivists.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 10:01 PM
5

The only way to get attention now is to say "Ours is the worst suffering!" It's a basic activism technique, and everyone uses it. Blacktivists, feminists, meninists, white advocacy people (I can't come up with a clever name here, help), ableist (sp) people, and so on.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 02:01 PM
1

It really is surprising--apparently women are far better suited to a modern academic environment at all levels. They get paid slightly worse, but they are on average far more successful in college. Seems we have two problems to work on--why are women paid less, and why do men struggle more as children and young adults in school?
/r/MensRights16/04/17 01:53 PM
1

Plenty of people deserve it. Abusive spouses deserve to get hit back, killers deserve death, rapists deserve at least a sound beating. A person can deserve something, and yet it be wrong to give it to them.
/r/MensRights04/04/17 10:00 PM
-11

I mean, to be fair here some people really do deserve a solid thump on the head. Unfortunately, it's bad form to be in a relationship with these people.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 07:26 PM
1

You're right; no funds or tribally-sponsored scholarships. Generic minority scholarships and racial claims? Well, those have no quantifiable basis. How black is black? It's however black you want it to be. I do it more so that employers can tick off a box on their diversity checklist. It makes me more appealing as a potential employee/student/etc.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 02:46 PM
9

I mean, I have Native American on my records and license just in case I need that extra little edge. I'm 1/16 Native American, so it's quite literally the minimum to get any sort of official recognition as a member of a minority race. I don't identify as any particular minority, and I think it would be a mockery for me to act like it. Anyone asks, I'm white...but I have the blood to make the claim, so I make it.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 02:24 AM
1

To be fair here, that guy looks like he's trying to imitate otter copulation. Still, not the worst thing since he's otter-ing someone who looks like her.
/r/MensRights28/02/17 06:26 PM
10

This is why I'm glad I'm an only child. My mom would scream and rant at me to take her anger out. When I went to college I basically told her that she could treat me properly or she'd never see me again. No problems to this day. She probably takes it out on my dad...but he knows he doesn't have to stay with her for my sake, so that's enough.
/r/MensRights24/02/17 02:59 PM
-2

Children have vaginas. Well, about half of them do anyway. Women are heavily encouraged to be ashamed of their bodies...or at least they're more susceptible to it than men are. That's what all that knee-jerk fat-praising and shit is on about; they feel repressed, so they swing radically in the other direction. Let's not give them more people to confuse by teaching little kids that their 'private parts' are something to be ashamed of. If you start off like that, then they'll already have negative…
/r/MensRights21/02/17 05:37 PM
3

Username checks out.
/r/MensRights13/02/17 09:03 PM
5

Capitalism is a shitty, terrible economic system that only a lunatic would think is ideal. Unfortunately, it's also the singularly most beneficial system humanity has come up with thus far.
/r/MensRights13/02/17 07:42 PM
2

True. I just wish men had primary custody of kids or something. Sure, it's not equality...but then I'd have this privilege that I supposedly have never noticed.
/r/MensRights10/02/17 10:03 PM
28

To be fair if a bitch started hitting me and then I learned the cops would hurt me no matter what, beating the shit out of someone to keep them quiet isn't such a terrible idea.
/r/MensRights10/02/17 11:32 AM
14

Exactly. Like having a history of sketchy bans.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 08:53 PM
56

Twitter has a history of sketchy bans, if I recall. Never assume there's a good reason for anything until it's demonstrated.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 07:01 PM
1

Can you teach me how to do this?
/r/PussyPassDenied24/06/16 04:54 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter