TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ScaleEarnhardt Archive

View 0 posts and 16 comments by ScaleEarnhardt on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
9

👏…….👏👏……👏👏👏…..👏👏👏👏👏👏
/r/MensRights20/12/24 02:05 PM
30

Came in here to essentially say that we need to be very vocal about making paternity tests mandatory at birth. Period. It’s inexpensive, especially considering the cost of raising a child that may not be your own, or the burden on the state to handle family court cases, and keeps everyone accountable. It’s no more invasive than all the other tests run at birth, and so long as the genetic results are disposed of after a designated grace period the potential for abuses of privacy would be negligib…
/r/MensRights17/12/24 06:12 PM
1

I’m sorry, because it looks like you took quite a bit of time writing that response and there’s a ton of great info, but it only takes a quick Google search to find plenty of information describing it quite clearly as a behavioral disorder that is diagnosable.
/r/MensRights04/12/24 06:37 AM
2

Narcissists and sociopaths are often high IQ and EQ, so, yes, they may be able to read other people well, but notice how I specifically wrote that they ‘neglect’ the perspectives of others. A person caught up in a momentary lapse of solipsism may unintentionally neglect, while a narcissist intentionally chooses to neglect due to a lack of empathy, which is an anti-social disorder of behavior. That’s just my read on it— one is a psychological diagnosis, the other is not a diagnosis but happens to…
/r/MensRights03/12/24 06:42 PM
2

I believe it’s essentially a more literary, less clinical, term for essentially someone is self-infatuated to the point of completely neglecting the perspectives of others. The solipsistic person may very well exhibit narcissistic tendencies temporarily or circumstantially, but may not fit the diagnostic requirements. Clinically diagnosable narcissists, however, would pretty much always act in solipsistic ways.
/r/MensRights03/12/24 05:59 PM
4

For an enlightened, balanced and relatively concise take, especially for being so encompassing, I’d refer you to a few recent episodes of the Modern Wisdom podcast. The show itself has almost nothing to do with ‘men’s rights’ explicitly, it’s simply a long form podcast that happens to have a majority male listeners/viewers, and the host does a wonderful job of navigating much of the issues objectively, intelligently, and isn’t afraid to dig into hypocrisy on both sides of the gender divide issue…
/r/MensRights25/11/24 09:53 PM
5

Prove it, or at least try to. We’ll pick it apart.
/r/MensRights25/11/24 07:33 AM
2

I came from a place where I had no idea how wonderful the women were who surrounded me. Until I got totally burned by a very charming true crime-loving, cancel culture addicted sociopath. She blew the lid off my perceptions. There are pockets of women that are far more toxic than even the worst men have to offer, and they are FAR more common and entitled by the current political climate. For those who have wonderful women in your life, who have faith in you, and who are loyal despite what other …
/r/MensRights24/11/24 06:02 AM
3

I told you the sub. It’s really not hard. It’s every other comment. ‘Men (as a demographic) are awful for X, Y, and Z. To say it’s not like that is simply denying reality and acting in bad faith. So, again. No.
/r/MensRights23/11/24 02:23 PM
2

Ummm. No. Lol.
/r/MensRights23/11/24 05:10 AM
1

In a ‘vibes’ society where women are absolutely bombarded by other women to hate the men in their lives, regardless of their actual circumstances, marriage has honestly become something to mindfully avoid. It’s so sad, to be blunt. This circumstance of diametrical opposition, when we should be mutually supportive, is a disease
/r/MensRights22/11/24 10:28 PM
2

Trump aside, go spend 5 minutes on TwoXChromosomes or really any women’s sub and tell me it isn’t absolutely rife with misandry. Election year or not. This sub has its issues too, but women are insanely vindictive towards men. It’s all honestly been enough for this equal rights-loving individual to want to just quit investing in interpersonal relationships at all. It’s disgusting.
/r/MensRights22/11/24 10:22 PM
2

Sounds dramatic, of course! I totally agree. But the fact is that these groups exist in every major city or region of the US, Canada, and the UK. And beyond. 3.5 million members. Groups often exceed 50k, but go up to 100’s of thousands. The vast majority of the content is women posting men that they have either matched with or are dating from online dating apps. If you are even moderately successful in that realm then you can be fairly certain you are on the groups. If you wish to know, find a f…
/r/MensRights23/03/24 04:32 PM
1

r/AWDTSGisToxic and r/AfterAWDTSG are not men’s groups, per say, but fantastic resources in the fight against these defamation machines
/r/MensRights23/03/24 02:19 AM
2

If you sense it then it’s almost certain. Most men in dating scenes now get posted. Often to intentionally destroy their reputation for sport
/r/MensRights23/03/24 02:17 AM
3

This specific issue has ‘red pilled’ countless men. It’s practically a machine for radicalization of men against women. Once a man finds out he’s been posted the depth of the betrayal comes pretty much immediately afterward with the realization that a huge portion of the women in your town are all in on this defamation and character assassination plot together. I hate to say it, but there are many women AND men who understand how this platform can be manipulated to fit their political agenda. Th…
/r/MensRights23/03/24 02:16 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter