TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ScaledDown Archive

View 0 posts and 50 comments by ScaledDown on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Super edgy
/r/PussyPassDenied15/09/17 03:00 PM
1

Haha, it never ceases to amaze me how similarly extremists, no matter where on the political spectrum, behave. I'll walk you through this a few individuals That's the flaw in your claim. The vast majority of women who identify as feminists want, and push for, INequality and special privileges for women, not for equality. No evidence The vast majority of feminists openly demand discrimination against men. No evidence Even almost-President Hillary Clinton said on camera that she wants to discrimin…
/r/MensRights02/07/17 08:29 PM
1

Nice, you provided evidence for the claim that was totally irrelevant to the conversation. Congratulations on your victory.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 08:18 PM
1

Its alright man, you can just say you have no evidence. No need for any of that
/r/MensRights02/07/17 03:50 PM
0

Haha well he certainly can't defend his argument. Go ahead, explain it to me.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 06:19 PM
1

Nothing says "well reasoned" like repeatedly calling someone who disagrees with you a "retard". Also, nothing says "teenager" like repeatedly calling someone a "retard". You don't seem to be able to refute anything I'm saying. You just side step my argument and insult me. It's a very immature way of communicating. Please, specifically refute the following points. Explain to me what your problem is with this logic: Feminism is advocacy for women's rights The purpose of my original comment was to …
/r/MensRights01/07/17 06:16 PM
2

Yup, I figured you didn't have any. Never was a fan of Hillary. She is one individual. I explained the acts of specific individuals dont change an ideology.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 05:59 PM
-1

Jesus Christ. Look, Republican, referring to the Republican Party, is literally in the dictionary. Green, when referring to the color, has one definition. Feminism only has one definition, and that is "advocacy for woman's rights". There is no parallel here.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 08:03 AM
1

I suspect you have no evidence for any of those claims.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 07:51 AM
0

I dont know how to make this any more clear. You made the statement "Nobody needs feminism". Feminism is advocacy for woman's rights. There are women in the Middle East. These women lack fundamental rights. So following everything up to this point, is it fair to say "someone needs feminism"? Let's keep this quote from you in mind: If you genuinely think...that males aren't also trafficked then you're a fucking retard And take a look at your list: 2.) Circumcision without consent Also happens to …
/r/MensRights01/07/17 07:47 AM
0

It does not. It makes no sense. I'll spell it out a little easier for you. Republicanism is, by definition, advocacy for a state in which the supreme power rests in the body of citizens entitled to vote and is exercised by representatives chosen directly or indirectly by them. Sure. But only an idiot would think that identifying as a Republican has anything to do with that. Okay. These ideologies have doctrines that go far beyond what the dictionary definition entails. What? Republican is a word…
/r/MensRights01/07/17 07:24 AM
1

And you did nothing to refute my claim. In fact you said "now you're getting it" when I explained to you why it is bullshit. Your refusal to further explain your argument makes me think you can't defend it.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 06:15 AM
1

And I've explained why it's nonsense. Can you defend it?
/r/MensRights01/07/17 06:04 AM
0

Lol who uses the word herewith? I certainly don't. Typing on my phone, something weird must have happened. I don't know how this isn't getting through to you. So you concede that women in the Middle East are severely disadvantaged? So unless you want to argue: 1.) People in the Middle East are not people Or 2.) Women are disadvantaged there but no one should advocate against it Then your entire argument (MRA is inherently anti-feminist, nobody needs feminism), falls flat. It's okay to admit when…
/r/MensRights01/07/17 05:30 AM
1

Lol then walk me through this. Explain to me how your analogy relates to feminism.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 05:15 AM
0

Again, who is moving the goalposts here*? Women in the Middle East are Women. Women in the Middle East face severe disadvantages. Feminism is advocacy for woman's rights. If you think these issues should be addressed, then it follows that (gasp) the world needs feminism. Workplace inequality, reproductive rights, human trafficking, media portrayal
/r/MensRights01/07/17 05:13 AM
-2

Quite the opposite. It shouldn't matter, but I'm not even a woman. I just recognize the problems faced by both genders, and have a desire for equality. It's not such an outlandish viewpoint to have outside of your internet bubble.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 05:04 AM
-1

I never said anything about the United States buddy. The World does not revolve around whatever country you reside in.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 05:02 AM
-2

Congratulations on being the second person to imply middle eastern women aren't women.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 04:20 AM
0

So condemn the specific groups and individuals that are doing the things you describe. See my comment below.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 11:54 PM
1

I'm definitely not. Your analogy is nonsense.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 10:15 PM
1

Republicanism is, by definition, advocacy for a state in which the supreme power rests in the body of citizens entitled to vote and is exercised by representatives chosen directly or indirectly by them. But only an idiot would think that identifying as a Republican has anything to do with that. What? This is irrelevant. When one identifies as a republican they aren't referring to the system of government. They are referring to the Republican Party, which is a completely separate term and does ha…
/r/MensRights30/06/17 10:03 PM
2

Did you read the comment you responded to? I addressed this.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 09:56 PM
0

From my original comment: The *world*... needs feminism Who's moving the goalposts here? Not to mention there are a number of serious issues feminists are fighting in the West. Feminists fighting for women's issues doesn't stop anyone else from fighting for men's issue. The ultimate goal here is equality. This isn't a competition about who has it worse.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 09:54 PM
0

Are middle eastern women not women? That's part of feminism.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 09:41 PM
-5

Nobody needs feminism. Women have more rights than men. If the biggest issues they can come up with are mansplaining and manspreading then it's definitely not needed. Really? Read about the situation in the middle East and tell me that again.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 09:10 PM
-7

Feminism is, by definition, advocacy for women's rights. Of course some feminists are also misandrists, but that's literally not what feminism is. Some Mra's are also misogynists but that shouldn't define the movement either. These are ideologies, not teams. You seem to view feminism as a team, an amalgam of all the worst things you've read about feminists. But the actions of a few individuals does not ideologically change what feminism is. If Paul Ryan stabbed a guy, that wouldn't change what c…
/r/MensRights30/06/17 07:11 PM
-15

Alright, I give up on this sub. Fighting situations in which fathers have their children unfairly taken away, or men having their lives ruined by a false rape accusation, is one thing. But mixing it in with this anti-feminist rhetoric is muddying your message. I'll just point out that, with all their flaws, neither /r/feminism nor /r/twoXchromosomes have a single post mentioning MRA on their front page. When's the last time the inverse was true?
/r/MensRights30/06/17 05:40 PM
3

Haven't heard him whining. Care to share? I went ahead and shortened your comment to the only actual necessary part for you. Here is almost 4 hours of him whining about trivial bullshit and being an insufferable asshole.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/06/17 07:57 AM
3

Whining while having a British accent doesn't make you smart.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/06/17 07:21 AM
62

You can make speculation regarding the cause of any statistic. For example, if that statistic went the other way and fathers were more likely to kill children than mothers, I could say: "Well men are more likely be away from the home all day at work. When they come home they are stressed and might take their frustration out on those around them. Also because they are always at work, they don't develop as much of a loving bond with their children compared to their mothers, so there isn't as much …
/r/MensRights18/05/17 09:18 PM
6

I made no implication regarding who has it worse.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 03:10 PM
22

Are you suggesting there wasn't rampant sexism against women in the Mad Men era? I agree with much of your comment but come on now, let's not forget the struggles women have faced.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 01:15 PM
1

My mistake. Both sides come up with the craziest things Totally agree. cheers.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/04/17 01:28 AM
1

You're really reaching to be offended here. They didn't like it.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/04/17 03:14 PM
3

It's your job to back up your own claims with evidence. Not the person you're arguing with. This is how discussion works in the real world. Also, try avoiding ad hominem.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 10:53 PM
5

cult of the foreskin Get the fuck out of here. We're in the cult of the foreskin just as much as we're in the cult of the fully intact vagina.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 10:48 PM
2

You can do whatever the fuck you want to yourself when you're an adult. Cover yourself in tattoos. Pierce your scrotum. Prong your tongue. Sharpen your teeth. Remove your dick entirely. I'm not saying it's necessarily a good idea.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 10:41 PM
2

You know that doesn't count as providing evidence, right?
/r/MensRights22/03/17 10:40 PM
1

What are you arguing?
/r/MensRights22/03/17 10:29 PM
9

I'm not going to argue semantics. The point is no one in their right mind would think subjecting a child to unnecessary cosmetic surgery is acceptable. That is not the same as to argue that cosmetic surgery should be illegal for consenting adults.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 09:33 PM
9

Of course an adult can mutilate their own genitals if they want to.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 09:28 PM
18

No one is forcing their child to get cosmetic surgery.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 08:17 PM
13

This statistic is not limited to fortune 500 CEO's
/r/MensRights22/02/17 06:18 AM
23

Why do you say that? Again, that's literally 1 out of 20.
/r/MensRights22/02/17 06:03 AM
1

Fuck off with your projections about me. I live in an extremely diverse part of the US and kids do stupid shit. There is nothing realist about "only black people do stupid shit".
/r/PussyPassDenied30/12/16 01:26 AM
8

Blatantly racist. This is a thread of racists high-fiving each other for being so "realistic" and "rational".
/r/PussyPassDenied26/12/16 07:19 PM
2

Give it time.
/r/MensRights11/11/16 08:15 AM
3

I swear to God if I read the words "fee fees" on this site one more time I'm going to have an aneurism.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 09:30 PM
4

https://www.reddit.com/r/changemyview/comments/4trojz/cmv_twitter_was_wrong_to_ban_milo_yiannopoulos/d5joni3
/r/PussyPassDenied22/07/16 06:29 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter