TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ScatmanChuck Archive

View 0 posts and 32 comments by ScatmanChuck on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Unfortunately i have never found a good study on the number of nerves. But studies like Sorrels et al have shown that the foreskin is the most sensitive part of the penis. Its my go to: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17378847/ If you use it though, be ready for pro circumcision idiots to use their usual lines like: BuT whAt kInD of SensItiVity?
/r/MensRights09/12/24 06:09 AM
5

Intactivist here - my biggest focus with arguing against MGM is making sure the right information is given. The 20,000 nerves figure comes from a very small study by one man where he measured a very small area of a foreskin and extrapolated the findings to the entire area. Its not an accurate study, and that number is likely highly exaggerated and not even close to the real number. I say this because any time one part of a 10 piece argument is wrong, slimy assholes take advantage of it to try to…
/r/MensRights09/12/24 06:04 AM
6

10 years ago you say? Yeah thats a hell of a lot more plausible. Its ridiculous how recently the medical community has woken up to the fact that amputative surgery might not be the best first line solution.
/r/MensRights28/02/24 02:52 PM
18

Seeing as how OP said he was forced, and usually no doctor worth their hippocratic oath would forcefully do a procedure on a 17 year old, i doubt it. Besides, in most cases, circumcision is not the optimal treatment for phimosis, its steroid cream and stretching.
/r/MensRights28/02/24 02:47 PM
11

This is likely a case of muslim or philipino circumcision if you ask me, as a 17 year old is more than old enough to have to give consent in any normal medical situation. Phimosis does not lead to blood supply being cut off unless its bad enough to strangle the head of the penis IF it gets retracted and cant be pulled back, in which circumcision is not necessarily needed. In 60-80% of cases of phimosis, simple stretching with steroid cream added if necessary is enough to solve the problem.
/r/MensRights28/02/24 02:45 PM
2

Airsaler commented this link in the comments but i thought it would be good to get it in this comment thread too for good measure: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tQv9DPFJ-5o
/r/MensRights11/02/24 09:51 AM
10

Theyre still basing their shit off of the three rct’s that have been criticised into hell. No mention of the newer larger studies done in denmark and canada, no mention of the fact that men who did and didnt take up VVMMC have the same rates of HIV despite more than a decade since its implantation. Just base it all on some shitty rct’s. Reality doesnt have to be consulted.
/r/MensRights10/12/23 12:46 PM
3

I disagree with nothing you have said. It also angers me that its waved away as an “old man disease”. It was also very jarring to hear that from the MD’s who gave our lectures on this.
/r/MensRights29/03/23 12:59 PM
3

I cant comment on much of the article but as a med student I immediately wanted to read the segment on prostate cancer. While it is certainly true that prostate cancer is underrecognised as a problem, men die of prostate cancer at a similar rate as women do from breast cancer. Breast cancer however has national screening programs and has had a ton of research behind it. This shows how much more deadly breast cancer is, if with all this effort behind preventing and treating it its still as big a …
/r/MensRights29/03/23 12:22 PM
3

Exactly
/r/MensRights30/11/22 02:54 PM
3

Ah, from the sentence break it looked like maybe the first question was a joke but the second an actual statement. Here take an upvote as apology.
/r/MensRights30/11/22 12:54 PM
9

Oh yeah thats completely out of the question, but fgm ranges from that at one end, and simple pricking that doesnt even remove any tissue (fgm type 4) which is far less severe, but the law in almost all countries in the world bans all types of fgm no matter how minor, while fully allowing circumcision. In some countries male genital mutilation gets far worse, in some Australian tribes a form of mutilation that splits the entire penis in half from tip to scrotum is practiced - but no one lifts a …
/r/MensRights30/11/22 09:49 AM
11

Sierra leone has an about 80% infibulation rate. This is the form of female genital mutilation where the entire vulva is removed and the vaginal opening sown shut. Its done during a day of celebration, only women are involved, and they do it willingly. Willingly howver in the same sense that little boys from remote african tribes do it willingly - you dont really have a choice, they just say you do but throw you out of the tribe if you make the wrong choice.
/r/MensRights30/11/22 06:51 AM
14

Yeah but those benefits are literally for every 119 boys circumcised one might be spared from a UTI and a small barely noticable decrease in some STD’s and a claimed reduction in one of the rarest cancers possible (penile cancer is litrrally rarer than male breast cancer) So like, cut off the hand to prevent ingrown nails levels of benefit.
/r/MensRights30/11/22 06:49 AM
1

I mean, its a bit much but he aint wrong tho
/r/MensRights14/07/22 06:51 PM
15

Less likely to graduate highschool, less likely to get into university, less likely to graduate university, 3 times as likely to kill ourselves, over 90% of workplace deaths, get retirement at a later age- die at an earlier age, the vast majority of homeless people, the minority of divorce instigators- the majority of alimony payers, the minority of child custody owners, the only gender that gets forced to pay child support for children that arent theirs even in many cases despite the fact they …
/r/MensRights21/06/22 07:19 AM
2

Nope
/r/MensRights04/05/22 02:22 PM
4

In almost all cases yes. Somewhere around 60-80%
/r/AntiFeminists01/05/22 08:14 AM
3

Belongs in r/iamsosmart
/r/MensRights07/04/22 05:26 AM
3

I would say that I’m sorry you had to go through that and hope that you didnt suffer any undue complications.
/r/MensRights21/02/22 07:39 AM
4

Yes, in most countries people dont acquire debt for medical treatment. They do in your wonderful america tho. Must be fun fighting against socialised healthcare because you have a lot of money and stand to lose if everyone gets the treatment they need at reasonable prices.
/r/MensRights19/01/22 01:29 PM
3

Why would i want to do that? To acquire a lifetime of debt? You are so full of yourself I can see the smoke rising from your ass. Classic americans. Yeah if you’re rich, everything is better in america. If youre a normal person or god forbid, poor, you will get screwed every way to sunday.
/r/MensRights19/01/22 01:19 PM
5

America spends more % of their gdp on healthcare than any other western developed world, every single health related news that comes out of your country is some depressing disaster, your insurances are overcomplicated scams that fail to cover necessary services. Your prices are so insane, that some patients prone to seizures wear “do not call an ambulance” necklaces so they dont get bankrupted by the ambulance rides they’d be liable to pay for. People need gofundme’s to pay for their life saving…
/r/MensRights19/01/22 12:48 PM
6

No they just go to buy their inhalers and insulin at a fraction of the cost so they dont have to bankrupt themselves for the privilege of being alive.
/r/MensRights19/01/22 12:38 PM
5

Im sure that the countless people who have to set up gofundme’s to afford their surgery and the thousands that go across the borders to Mexico and Canada to be able to afford the medicine they need to save their lives agree with everything you’re saying.
/r/MensRights19/01/22 11:35 AM
7

https://www.google.com.my/amp/s/www.cnbc.com/amp/2019/11/26/when-your-insurer-does-not-cover-your-maternity-costs.html 3,000 dollars for one obgyn visit. I got angry because my gp charged me like 30 euros for a visit which was fully covered by my insurance anyway. It will never fail to impress me how rabidly Americans will defend their failing healthcare system, with your multi hundred dollar inhalers and insulin shots, ridiculous prices and bureaucratic insurance policies, and countless unneces…
/r/MensRights19/01/22 10:59 AM
6

Yes, I am sure that delivery and labour care, which in some american hospitals can cost as much as 30k, is barely profitable. The american healthcare system is probably the sickest joke god put on this green earth. Im sure the hospitals just hate the money they make off of this severely overpriced unnecessary procedure. And its totally only the parents that push for it, its not like new parents get a knock on their door from a nurse every 5 minutes “Are you sure you dont want to circumcise?”
/r/MensRights19/01/22 09:31 AM
9

A 10 minute procedure thats charged for around 100-300 dollars and that some hospitals literally do in assembly line fashion? Not to mention the hospitals that “donate” the tissue for research and to pharmaceutical companies.
/r/MensRights19/01/22 08:56 AM
3

It doesnt sound creepy and primitive. I was born in europe, and as a baby was dunked naked in a cauldron of “holy” water (baptised) because thats just what we do. Its really hard to break from tradition, no matter how extreme that tradition is. Its a very brave step to take if you really will let your future sons decide, and I’d be very happy to have played a part in that decision. Have a very nice day.
/r/MensRights17/05/21 11:54 AM
2

The thing is the only reason they are stopping is because of outside influence. These practices have persisted for a looong time, people ignore when it goes wrong most of the time. In a 5 year period in South Africa around 500k boys were admitted to hospital for complications of circumcision. Many die, and as many as 2 lose their entire penises for each that die, so in terms of bad outcomes, genital mutilation is terrible for both girls and boys. In the end, what you said at the end is the most …
/r/MensRights17/05/21 11:33 AM
3

No, it does not go wrong most of the time, at least not in the developed world. In africa however for example there are an unbelievable amount of cases of things going wrong. Men who have their foreskin can tell you its use-its really fun to have. Just like all the external parts of a woman’s genitals its not needed, but it is certainly liked by its owners and removed from boys without their consent.
/r/MensRights17/05/21 11:20 AM
3

The biggest problem is almost all circumcised men were either circumcised at birth or as young children, and so dont really know the difference, or were circumcised as adults for severe medical issues with their foreskin. Case and point, its difficult to find adult men that had perfectly healthy foreskin removed, and so finding the difference can be difficult.
/r/MensRights17/05/21 11:15 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter