| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | What life script would be better suited for (young) men than the one we currently have?It is, don't get me wrong, but we simply cannot start from the viewpoint that everything will work out (near) perfectly in all cases. Allowing room to get more stricter where necessary will allow for near 100% of children in this case to have good enough outcomes, instead of 70 to 90%, whatever the exact numbers are of cases where 50/50 custody is a good solution, as it's both an extra safety measure and will stimulate parents that would make for bad parents currently to get help if they want to… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/05/20 12:42 AM |
| 1 | What life script would be better suited for (young) men than the one we currently have?Ah I already see the problem, this is more of an emotional than a rational argument for you, because all good laws have historically and nowadays also considered these "outliers" or otherwise they would have never survived without having had adaptations. Human behaviour cannot be idealised so you should always be prepared for the worst as well, while trying to stimulate the best. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/05/20 12:30 AM |
| 1 | What life script would be better suited for (young) men than the one we currently have?No exceptions | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/05/20 12:09 AM |
| 1 | What life script would be better suited for (young) men than the one we currently have?But if there is black on white proof of such a thing being both true and an active threat to the child, isn't it reasonable to strip away their parental rights until the point where they can show that these things aren't a problem anymore? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/05/20 08:25 PM |
| 1 | What life script would be better suited for (young) men than the one we currently have?mandatory 50/50 shared parenting in event of divorce. No exceptions. Work it out. What in the event of one of them being a rapist, child abuser, pedophile and/or otherwise unwilling or unable to provide and take care of the very basic needs of the child(ren) in question, be it due to mental reasons (borderline, down's syndrome, ...), environmental (parent is involved in child trafficking, pimping, ...) or other (extreme substance abuse, ...)? Shouldn't the child's well-being be thought of as wel… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/05/20 08:13 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter