TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SchrodingersRapist Archive

View 0 posts and 410 comments by SchrodingersRapist on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
9

If SHE didn't want anymore kids, SHE should have gotten surgery to ensure that. No, he isn't an asshole, but he ain't that bright either. Relationships often end, regardless of promises and commitments, and now he's paying for an elective surgery he didn't want to adhere to something she wanted. Should be a lesson to anyone else about what lines you shouldn't be willing to cross to give someone else something they can get themselves.
/r/MensRights12/08/24 08:43 PM
1

They don’t get to change it however and whenever they feel like it without serious effort involved Unfortunately they do get to change it however they wish, and then "we" have to fight their bullshit through the government court system to prove otherwise
/r/MensRights17/06/24 05:55 PM
3

A lot of you are worried about equality. I'm worried about what this actually says about expectations of impending conflict requiring reinstituting the draft.
/r/MensRights16/06/24 10:19 PM
8

The entire premise of these hypotheticals are nonsense. No one is really going to choose a bear regardless of what ideological bullshit they spout. Furthermore, especially in dense urban areas, deal with strangers every day and the vast majority of those interactions are not ending in anything they're harpy screeching about. Honestly I, at you age with years and a multitude of options ahead of you, would take it as a serious red flag. That is a girl who isn't fully connected with reality and vie…
/r/MensRights07/05/24 11:19 AM
9

Women have a very weird duality. You can be slimy, sleazy, abusive, with no money and treat them like shit and they will flock to you. You want to treat them decently and it seems like they'll never give you the time of day without having a home and lots of money. Just my experience, and why, when I bother at all, its just dating them and not trying to put them in a position to have a hold over my life, hard work, or possessions. It took me a couple times but I learned my fucking lessons. I woul…
/r/MensRights05/05/24 09:44 PM
8

Any woman who argues a bear is safer to be around than me, I highly suggest they go cuddle one. Ain't got time for this bullshit from girls anymore.
/r/MensRights02/05/24 10:42 AM
10

I mean, it's the same thing as an incel only female... Im not sure the OP is using it correctly
/r/MensRights18/03/24 11:48 PM
30

Both the siblings should have been tried for murder and left to rot in uncleaned cells somewhere. Instead, what we got was far less. I don't understand how the maximum you can give anyone, even a minor, for killing someone is 30 days. We're talking premeditated murder here, the 17 year old went looking for this man to do him harm. If the 30 days for murder isn't infuriating enough, it says the girl's punishment was less but details are sealed.
/r/MensRights13/12/23 05:18 PM
1

...this device is explicitly designed with paternity fraud in mind... Disagree. The company is advocating this fraud, but the device itself was probably designed expressly for just insemination. It's similar, or identical, to plenty of other insemination devices sold as such.
/r/MensRights12/12/23 01:38 AM
22

Because, to my knowledge, it has only ever come up in the context of child support cases. At which point they don't care about the legality of the method of conception and merely rule that you are liable for a child produced by your sperm. Criminally... It probably couldn't be considered theft(from you) because if you threw it into the trash can than it shows you discarded it and surrendered ownership Couldn't be sexual assault or rape because of the actions actually taking place don't involve a…
/r/MensRights12/12/23 12:42 AM
35

They made Issac Newton Black... That's really a minor thing in the bullshit they've done in the specials so far. I was hoping that with the return of David Tennant and Catherine Tate it was, at least for the specials, going to revert a lot of the PC identity bullshit that has ruined the series for years. I mean, aside from the minutes long discussion of how the alien identifies, the entire end of the first special was lazy, gender politics bullshit. Literally undid a heart felt ending to one of …
/r/MensRights10/12/23 10:17 PM
93

Boy math is buying a home, planning for retirement, and making her sign a prenup amidoinitrite?
/r/MensRights03/10/23 01:44 AM
88

How the fuck she got away with that ? Fame, money, pussypass....and guys unwilling to get over their ego and report her I would guess
/r/MensRights30/09/23 11:37 PM
3

Extortion
/r/MensRights19/09/23 01:54 PM
61

How do you justify this level of intrusion into a family anyway? There are two outcomes to a test: 1) They are the parent and therefore should have all the say over testing their child 2) They aren't the parent, but are presumed to be so without a test. Forcing them not to test under threat of imprisonment and provide for an offspring not their own, is tantamount to slavery
/r/MensRights18/09/23 03:18 PM
8

The problem is money is fungible, and housing plus utilities have always been considered to be a cost provided for the child. A few receipts showing they spent money on the child and boom they're in the clear, while all it did was free up "other" money to go towards their wants
/r/MensRights16/09/23 10:34 AM
6

...it's a TwoXChromosomes post, but reads like satire. Im concerned they are becoming self aware
/r/MensRights15/08/23 03:21 PM
15

Oppressions since the dawn of time! /s
/r/MensRights12/08/23 01:13 PM
12

On the morning of Nov. 9, 2016, my then 8-year-old son found me sobbing on our family room couch in a suburb outside Washington, D.C. FFS... I couldn't read any further than this bullshit. The kind of people who say this sort of thing, whether it's true or not, are deeply troubled.
/r/MensRights06/08/23 09:17 PM
278

encourages other women to use it for their benefit to avoid full accountability We've been at that place for decades already. It's a goto for divorce proceedings, or really ANY legal case involving women, that women will claim abuse, child abuse, or any number of things to get the upperhand. None of it is punished, and I've never read about any lawyer being censured for their clients doing it either.
/r/MensRights26/06/23 10:55 AM
1

It's not a real thing, and anyone with the most basic observation skills should be able to see that. The "gap" is said to be anywhere from 77% to 82% of pay for every dollar. Yet if that's the case we would see nothing but women in the workforce. A 20% labor cost reduction would just make good business sense.
/r/MensRights18/03/23 07:26 PM
179

That's been the goal since the third wave and they all went batshit crazy. Punish males for imagined or made up slights and continue to misconstrue the stats to play victims
/r/MensRights12/03/23 04:35 PM
17

They don't care about lawsuits, not because they don't care about laws or human rights, but because it's not them personally who foot the bill it's the tax payers.
/r/MensRights12/03/23 04:33 PM
13

I have never understood that Canadian ruling, or how it even got into the court system. At least with marriage I can see how it goes to court, basically a contract dispute. In the case of a dating couple not even cohabitating, especially without kids or joint property, what is there to justify a court being involved in the absence of theft or fraud of some kind?
/r/MensRights08/03/23 09:58 AM
12

Not if they've been raised in this sort of environment
/r/MensRights17/02/23 04:34 PM
20

Ffs even without the shady immorality of it... 6 dates a week, just to eat for free, sounds exhausting
/r/MensRights25/01/23 10:13 AM
12

Never let a good excuse to spread propaganda go to waste. If the poster said something worth banning than that should be what it was about. Using it as a platform to spread your vile opinions to others, presenting it as genuine truth, is shitty to say the least
/r/FeminismStopsWhen19/12/21 04:05 PM
5

I think it's referencing sex trafficking.... You know, an act that has already been made very illegal, but for some reason criminals doing criminal acts are the "patriarchy" according to this drivel. It's akin to blaming a third party, innocent bystander for the crimes of a murderer. Utter nonsense
/r/FeminismStopsWhen17/10/21 12:07 AM
18

So they just need to speak up and communicate. Christ, if you're faking orgasms of course your partner isn't going to know you haven't gotten yours, but to blame them for it is absurd.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen22/07/21 05:25 PM
5

You can't have good faith arguments with victims of their own psychosis
/r/FeminismStopsWhen26/06/21 05:12 PM
2

Get your stuff out of the place, and seek a restraining/protection/no contact order from the magistrate. Women arent held to any standard anymore and can freely make false accusations to ruin a man's life. Cut your loses, get away from the situation, and have alibis of where you are(even if its just your phone tracking your gps). It won't get her charged when she lies, but it might keep you out of jail over it.
/r/MensRights07/06/21 07:36 AM
5

Are you sure? He was at -3 when I came to the party....
/r/FeminismStopsWhen03/06/21 05:09 PM
38

Blame shifting at it's finest. Personal decisions are the responsibility of "society" and not yourself.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen03/06/21 04:57 PM
12

Hey I found this '/s' and Im really hoping it's yours
/r/FeminismStopsWhen03/06/21 04:56 PM
19

I for one support letting them have them. It's easier to pick out the psychos in the crowd then
/r/FeminismStopsWhen27/05/21 02:22 PM
7

You're wasting your breath, just report them. This is the same poster whining about nuance in this thread while calling people pedos. Advocating that teenagers have to ID each other instead of just expecting girls not to lie about their ages. They're obviously a troll
/r/MensRights28/12/20 03:27 PM
3

Easy response is to just disown these asshats
/r/MensRights20/11/20 01:05 PM
27

Now it’s just bitching about men If that were all it did, it would be fine. People can bitch about whatever they want, and we can just not associate with those sorts. The problems come in with the whole believe all women ideas, and the way laws have been written so that if you're accused you have to prove innocence. Absolutely not the way the legal system should work. They stack the deck so much that even if you do prove something reasonably isn't a guarantee you will actually win in court. Even…
/r/MensRights06/11/20 10:17 PM
13

...and fear half the population... Nah, women would never do something as illogical as view that every man is a potential attacker, like some sort of superpositional human being. That would be silly and destroy societal interactions between the sexes 🤡
/r/MensRights10/09/20 03:09 PM
1

Only half? Thats disappointing...
/r/MensRights05/08/20 10:42 AM
4

I vote she act on those impulses. Eventually she'll find the guy willing to defend himself and learn a lesson
/r/MensRights30/06/20 12:58 AM
10

Well no shit, but this post makes me think it isn't about brain power either.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen28/05/20 11:48 PM
22

How is it disrespectful to those people? If it's a single mother, they have mother's day.... If it's a same sex couple who are women, they have mother's day.... It makes no sense.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen28/05/20 09:06 PM
1

Just never decide and accept superposition
/r/MensRights18/05/20 10:35 AM
8

Woah! Lets not toss around hurtful sayings like that...poor Schrodinger /s
/r/MensRights15/05/20 08:41 AM
9

The only privilege people have I’d argue is wealth. I disagree. While wealth will absolutely increase the opportunities in life, having tits will definitely get you more opportunity in the world as well. We can argue about whether its affirmative action or not, but it's still a benefit in the modern age.
/r/MensRights28/02/20 11:36 PM
5

Is meme, comrade. Nothing more
/r/MensRights16/02/20 09:31 PM
43

Rule #2: If you are ugly, be rich
/r/MensRights16/02/20 09:19 PM
17

Joe applied for a few jobs in offices....but could never get a start because the companies all had employment quotas to increase women in the workforce. That part speaks deeply to me. I, with lab training, graduate work, specialization in the field, and ranked first on the state registry didn't even get an interview, but watched the undergrad I tutored through the single analytical course she took get the state job we both applied for. I can only assume she got it because of gender...
/r/MensRights20/01/20 08:00 PM
2

My life has been on hold for 8 months and NOBODY GIVES A SHIT Apparently, people can lie and fuck up your life and I'm just supposed to smile and be thankful I'm not being sent to prison over a crime I didn't commit. It's not just the military, but civilian too is a biased, corrupt system and if you're a man accused by a woman of anything you are guilty until you can prove your innocence beyond a shadow of a doubt. It doesn't take overwhelming evidence, it only takes an accusation to get charged…
/r/MensRights08/01/20 03:14 PM
164

One visit to family court will shut him up Not just family court, criminal court will too. Have an issue with/against a woman and see how they're believed and treated like they can't do shit wrong. Watch the punishments given for the same crimes. It's fucking insane
/r/MensRights27/12/19 04:28 PM
24

So hear me out, I'd even be ok with having a woman in that sort of homemaker position in our relationship. However, the girls I've even wasted time on who didn't have a degree, were broke, etc etc... None of them would do anything around the house either. No cooking. No cleaning. Literally they brought sex to the table and that was fucking all. If Im going to have to do everything anyway picking up someone from the bar for the night is a better deal financially. At best Im not having to pay any …
/r/MensRights04/12/19 09:27 PM
38

I did some tenp work as janitor Never mind the hover... I worked as a full-time janitor for an AT&T office building when I was 18-21. Lemme fucking tell you, women are nasty af. Forget the hover pissers, they would hover shit all the time, miss the bowl, and either drop straight on the floor or the seat. Then, without any shame, just leave it there for someone else to clean up.
/r/MensRights06/11/19 08:50 PM
12

After reading through that sub for a couple of minutes, it's shitty and I think it gave me cancer.... ...but a minute old screenshot, of a post that doesn't seem to exist anymore, seems fishy as fuck.
/r/MensRights23/10/19 08:33 PM
1

Well granted, I see your point. I think however the police and DA report should be rolled together as a single one. The DA's report was based on the police report, which itself was at least partially based ont he hospital's report. Somewhere down this line it's just rehashing the same information, and I dont think the DA did any of its own investigation after the police. That still doesn't change the fact that there is no evidence backing the university's decision, and seems to be evidence entir…
/r/MensRights04/10/19 08:17 PM
11

So, why isn't he suing the university as well? They expelled him with less than a single full load semester of credits shy of a degree based on no evidence, and actually reports from not only the police but also the hospital that there was no evidence of what was said being truthful. They need to be held liable for their actions as well
/r/MensRights04/10/19 12:09 AM
13

In what fucking class could that possibly be relevant to be taught? This is the kind of loony shit I would expect to see in some college gender studies degree in bullshittery, but in a public school? Seriously?
/r/MensRights09/09/19 05:17 PM
53

its difficult to know whether his claims are reasonable It doesn't matter if his claims are reasonable. With the sheriff finding no evidence of direct threats he's allowed to say anything he likes and this is a clear violation of his civil rights. If the judge wants to pursue him for his words there is a civil court avenue for it where she can prove damage. This looks like nothing but abuse of position and power.
/r/MensRights04/09/19 10:12 PM
3

How would you write a rule that makes this NSFW without banning a gigantic amount of ordinary photos Intent and wording. It literally talks about sexual fetishes of mens' submission paired with the photo
/r/MensRights07/05/19 08:29 PM
24

I’m 17 so I had to have my parents file it for me cause I’m underaged That's not how that works.... Who the fuck told you that you can't make your own police report because you were underage?
/r/MensRights24/04/19 03:39 AM
50

Oil Nah, if they had oil we'd have liberated these poor oppressed people
/r/MensRights21/04/19 08:29 PM
2

....that's not rare
/r/MGTOW18/03/19 03:33 AM
1

Who the fuck would put up with that? Live alone and get a dog. You'd be doing the exact same thing you are now, all the house maintenance, but at least the dog will get excited you came home.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 09:52 PM
4

No, because the sex offender registry is taking punishment and extending it into perpetuity after you have served your sentence. To say nothing about the people who get put on it for things it was never intended for (dating between teenagers, peeing in public...). It should be abolished. With that said, these women need to be charged with a crime(step 1) and more harsh than just filing false reports and making false statements. Let them face major prison time for the impact to a life that might …
/r/MGTOW22/02/19 05:00 AM
1

That is the most unfortunate thing I have seen today...
/r/MGTOW13/02/19 05:17 AM
16

I thought it was pretty obvious that picking someone for something based on their sex or race, and not on their merit, was bias(racist, sexist, etc.). The only question is why after so many years does it still happen everywhere....
/r/MensRights24/01/19 03:41 PM
25

Yeah. That sounds like a trap to me. Im a cynical asshole though, so...
/r/MensRights18/09/18 04:48 AM
17

Right. The first and second wave feminism movements were about equality and were justified for it. The problems start with the third wave and beyond where equality is just a word used and special rights for women and punishment/disenfranchisement of men are the actual goals
/r/MensRights06/05/18 04:14 PM
7

You got a source for that 70% number?
/r/MensRights23/04/18 08:13 PM
90

That's not a fair comparison. Oh it absolutely is. Basing college acceptance/funding, or jobs, not on merit but instead on superficial features will absolutely make people wonder about credentials.
/r/MensRights29/03/18 06:57 AM
2

It wont be the cunt(s) who are paying for it though. It will be the Kansas tax payers. They should be going after the pensions of the judge, DA, and detective on his case but wont/cant. The real problem is that Kansas gives more help to people who actually serve their time and get out of prison than to those exonerated. If he had finished a sentence they would have helped him find housing, employment, and job training. Because they just exonerated him they offer nothing at all.
/r/MensRights05/03/18 02:12 AM
4

... the paternalistic lecture given by Whites towards a person of color defining what should and shouldn't be considered racist. ..wha...how... So only "people of color" get to decide what is racist? That made my head hurt, and probably the most racist thing I will read all day.
/r/MensRights01/03/18 11:58 PM
284

what makes them think this would ever hold up in court Because it's worked so far to deny "X only clubs" as long as they are male, or non-minority? The fact that they keep a team of lawyers on retainer and most student's don't? Unless the ACLU or some other rights group takes it up it requires personal money to fight. They have much more money to pay out than the average student by considerable amounts.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 08:16 PM
3

Look at feminist sources... So, use self-confirming sources. From the topic I assume it isn't a class under science or engineering so shit sources are probably allowed anyway. I can only imagine stacks and stacks of papers citing wikipedia...
/r/MensRights23/01/18 08:10 PM
12

Sure. But... No "Sure", no "but". It's wrong in any instance to violate another human being in such a way, regardless of the crime they are guilty or innocent of. To insinuate that it is only the right thing to uphold not doing it because someone might be accused when innocent misses the entire point of why said violation is deeply wrong. Furthermore, that officer should be fired for such a display, and in a courtroom makes it that much worse. The endorsement and sanctioning of such a terrible a…
/r/MensRights03/12/17 06:49 AM
103

When is someone finally going to say... When they care more about the message than keeping their job and having their life ruined by not apologizing. It's bullshit, but its the same for every shrill PC narrative. The loud groups pushing them will ruin lives over going against it, so until the stance matters personally to someone it won't be held.
/r/MensRights12/11/17 07:05 AM
5

Its not the clinics fault the ex-wife committed fraud. It might not be the clinics fault that the fraud was attempted. I, however, believe it is their fault a child was conceived through fraud when a step as simple as having both parties present at the clinic to sign the consent forms would have prevented it. They still have a responsibility for due diligence on their own part and they failed miserably.
/r/MensRights06/10/17 09:48 PM
1

I mean the top comment here is about how unfunny she is. Totally irrelevant.... so yeah
/r/MensRights23/08/17 04:37 PM
7

Why is this here? She's allowed to ask for anything, and nothing about this picture says she's using some feminist bullshit, the victim card, or anything to try and justify(force) it. I even went and read the two paragraph story here and it doesn't say she did anything but renegotiate. So just outrage for outrage sake? She's terrible and not funny, but if they're willing to pay her insane amounts for her shit isn't that between netflix and her?
/r/MensRights23/08/17 02:27 PM
4

You wouldn't think so from the downvotes
/r/MensRights09/08/17 08:07 PM
7

So a bunch of women took personal days? Im ok with that, for whatever reason they wanted to take a personal day. They worked for the personal days, they are their's to take. They can not show up because the sky is too blue that day as long as they take it from their own leave time for all I care. Having someone fired for trying to have an open discussion, releasing an internal message in attempt to shame them into silence, eventually doxxing and getting the person fired though is bullshit. Those…
/r/MensRights09/08/17 06:18 PM
19

Of course not. If contempt is anything like in the states they'll just hold him in jail indefinitely for it or until he changes his mind and produces the money.
/r/MensRights17/07/17 12:16 PM
16

God damn, they want $19.95 to purchase the PDF Welcome to academia, and their silly white paper paywalls
/r/MensRights13/07/17 06:52 PM
28

and my axe
/r/MensRights17/05/17 06:43 PM
9

Prosecutors should be required to be defense attorneys first. Or just not measured and promoted by a "cases won" stat, but instead on some meaningful basis of the tried cases' details.
/r/MensRights20/01/17 05:34 AM
92

Of course it isn't justice. Our system isnt setup for justice, or even rehabilitation. It's setup to be a revolving door, source of income, and a way to pad numbers for politicians and DAs to look good being tough on <X> for re-election.
/r/MensRights19/01/17 08:14 PM
14

Do you literally always have to be... You know the answer to that is yes.
/r/MensRights15/01/17 04:17 PM
15

Exactly like the US
/r/MensRights09/12/16 04:37 PM
8

How about when giving out academic awards we focus on the individual as an academic? The same reason they are more likely to accept, and fund in the case of grad school, female students. They are an "oppressed minority". Its a sickening show of preferential treatment over merit based awards/acceptance. It's not going to get better until someone can hit these organizations in the pockets with a suit that sets precedence, which unfortunately won't happen.
/r/MensRights14/10/16 07:40 PM
2

I love Judge Judy I do as well, but I cant watch her show. Not because of her, but because of the guests. Seriously where do they dig up some of those people? >.<
/r/MensRights09/10/16 06:41 PM
18

And dont forget that this gender "minority" known as women gets special support, special exemptions to attend, special funding options, special treatment... even in the STEM fields.
/r/MensRights19/09/16 02:19 PM
1

....and ignoring the entire point of a post to take rational of two underage teenagers engaging and consenting to a mutual act with one another in a dating relationship to an absurd stance and middle eastern practices that aren't remotely related to the argument is where I call it with you. I think the others who've labeled you a troll were correct. I'll be sure to tag you so I can ignore you in the future thanks. Edit: and shit I guess if we're trying to label fallacies lemme give you yours. Yo…
/r/MensRights16/09/16 10:36 PM
2

anyone gets who has sex with someone who legally cant consent due to age of consent Then BOTH should be charged, as NEITHER could consent. That is the entire point. One is being charged and identified while the other is being hidden and claimed the victim. The age of consent in WI is 18, neither could consent, neither were forced, both were children in the eyes of the law, both are guilty of all three charges you list. Or we could be rational and say that as a dating couple of teenage age they w…
/r/MensRights16/09/16 10:23 PM
4

teach them the evils of fucking someone who can't consent to sex They're both teenaged minors. Either they both can consent to one another meaning no crime, or neither can consent and both should be charged. There is no "evil" imagined or otherwise in this story
/r/MensRights16/09/16 03:04 PM
7

....or anonymously authored
/r/MensRights27/08/16 03:35 AM
10

college men try to ignore it all I don't ignore it, but I got shit to do so I can get my degree and get out. Hell there is a flier right now in my department's grad lounge that rubbed me wrong. The college is holding a womens only thesis/dissertation workshop. Nothing else posted for an open to all, or men's only workshop....
/r/MensRights17/08/16 12:18 PM
16

Would Finland have a Finish?
/r/MensRights30/07/16 05:55 PM
0

According to tumblr anything can be a gender if you just believe.
/r/MensRights24/06/16 09:06 PM
12

Don't forget cynicism
/r/MensRights01/05/16 07:28 PM
16

....its not free up until the case is decided. No lawyer who lost a case would ever get paid if that were true. Lawyers time, filings, and other shit costs money.
/r/MensRights27/03/16 04:11 AM
54

Everything about that sounds expensive as fuck.....
/r/MensRights26/03/16 10:52 PM
11

Here's a wild idea, lets stop listening to celebrities whose only major accomplishments and specialties in life are being good to look at on a screen. What is Emma Watson's degree in? Published research area? Why should I give a shit what Sean Penn or Matt Damon think about <X>? This isn't even a rights issue to me, its a problem with the herd mentality. How about we stop giving these people attention when they drag a soapbox on some award stage? Just cut their mics if they do more than thank th…
/r/MensRights16/03/16 07:30 PM
12

There you go using logic again....
/r/MensRights15/03/16 05:14 PM
8

Oh no you misunderstand. I understood what it is accomplishing, I don't understand why we've allowed it to become what it is.
/r/MensRights01/03/16 10:39 PM
15

My father lost half of his military retirement in the divorce. Nevermind that it was his retirement, and he still had 10 years of service left before he got it... I guess we were just lucky that selfish cunt didn't want the house or anything when she ran off. I'll never understand the mentality that goes on in divorce courts. Even ignoring the bullshit that is alimony, how do you award things like disability and retirement to another person? Those are things you personally worked for.
/r/MensRights01/03/16 08:37 PM
4

fuck I need a flag for my subs... thought I was on /r/libertarianmeme for a minute Why the fuck is this here?
/r/MensRights17/02/16 06:12 PM
3

This was close to 7 years ago first of all so Im over it and not looking to revisit that bullshit even if it is/was an option. Second, the college didn't do anything like kick me out. Just formerly friendly faculty keeping me at best at arms length, and at worst showing overt displeasure with my presence, and having to defend myself at a code of conduct hearing. Explaining what was going on with the break ins and various other bullshit didn't get any reaction in regards to the ex. Anyway, Im ove…
/r/MensRights22/01/16 01:13 AM
14

An option sure, but not realistic. I filed against her and ended up moving after her parents hired her a lawyer who motioned for it to be moved from small claims to a higher court which meant money I couldn't afford to pay, and they got the college and the local shelter all over my ass saying suing her was harassment. It just generally made life hell. It would have been better to have the police and DA do their jobs and have that to point to, but instead I had nothing.
/r/MensRights21/01/16 07:07 PM
59

Victims don't press charges I can vouch for this personally. You cannot make the police arrest someone and you cannot force a DA to press charges. Ex of mine repeatedly broke into my apartment, and even when caught in the act the police and DA refused to pursue anything. Unfortunately since DAs are elected, or appointed, it is a political position. They worry about PR when bringing charges in cases.
/r/MensRights21/01/16 05:11 PM
4

If you can afford a lawyer and the appeal needed to get it to a real court maybe. In my experience county or city courts that hear ticket cases really don't give a shit what you have to say unless it's glaring proof they were wrong in issuing the ticket. I highly doubt they will be swayed by any equality argument.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 05:12 AM
63

has never turned wood, laid concrete, milled aluminum, welded steel You know, I've noticed in my life that some of the most well-off/pampered/comfortable (the ones that have never had to work hard for anything in life or however you want to put it) people are the ones that decide that everyone needs to changes because <x> is unfair or wrong. The only real life experiences they have are through their car window or whatever tripe they read. I wholeheartedly believe it's a complete lack of critical…
/r/MensRights29/10/15 05:26 PM
2

Hey, so glad I found you! You dropped this "/s"
/r/MensRights29/10/15 05:19 PM
4

Not just hired but standards will be lowered for their funding options in academic pursuit in STEM as well. Its happened here at the program I am with at least once(that I know of). This girl couldn't even meet the requirements to be accepted but she's getting a full ride for her graduate school. While I surpass all the requirements, get no funding, and beg/borrow/scrape by on whatever outside sources I can apply for. The whole system is bullshit at this point.
/r/TheRedPill24/10/15 03:22 PM
12

against blacks. Against any minority, not just blacks. What trips me out is they talk about it and try to justify it through some "institutionalized racism/sexism" bullshit. All without being able to see they are doing exactly what they claim others are doing by promoting lower standards for jobs, schools, scholarships, and grants based on skin color/sex instead of qualifications. If you point out their bullshit though you're a bigot or misogynist.
/r/MensRights23/10/15 05:57 PM
1

idk, no one I know has ever failed them that I know of. Probably they would say the person couldn't TA anymore due to legal concerns. Which might get their funding pulled and while not kicking them out would require them to self fund. I don't get funding, because of one cunt of a professor taking issue with me several years back, so unless it is directly related to class work I basically tell the university to fuck off with anything they want me to do. I'll let you know what happens if they ever…
/r/MensRights21/10/15 01:29 PM
2

were you not requied to pass it? They require grad students here to take a bunch of classes covering various bullshittery and we are required to pass. I've just been ignoring all the requests to do them.
/r/MensRights20/10/15 12:35 PM
26

Wasn't there a war fought so we wouldn't have to ask them anything anymore?
/r/MensRights15/10/15 02:18 PM
2

really looking forward to hearing something positive Really? Cause I read it and immediately thought that they were going to spin it like the wage gap and women in STEM fields. Not having an interest from a certain demographic does not mean the employers are biased in some way. But alas, I will never get to know since it was a joke.
/r/MensRights12/10/15 08:05 PM
2

And probably in private too
/r/MensRights12/10/15 07:47 PM
27

I don't even exist Don't you understand that even as a non-existent male you're in the super position of rape?
/r/MensRights09/10/15 03:32 PM
14

Hire women...get sued Don't hire women...get sued It sounds like a matter of which type of suit is the more winnable and cheaper is their only decision.
/r/MensRights19/09/15 11:07 PM
53

Pretty sure its more along the lines of "having, had, or wishing to have a penis". I've seen plenty of them hate on trans people as well.
/r/MensRights05/08/15 03:14 PM
3

I'm more surprised Im not on the list than the fact that there is a list.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 01:20 AM
2

Depending on the field, her peers, and higher ups(chair, dean) this might be completely acceptable to them. Further, if she has tenure that is basically a means to hold and day whatever view you want and short of doing something extreme their jobs are safe mostly.
/r/MensRights19/06/15 02:52 PM
3

Womens studies, some art degree maybe. I don't see the critical thinking skills a high level stem degree would require, just rhetoric.
/r/MensRights19/06/15 02:48 PM
9

ITT: I don't think some of you get it. Mensrights is already listed as a hate group by some places. The current CEO seems pretty obvious as to her position with her law suits and comments made to the effect of totalitarian ideas of running the site. Was /r/fatpeoplehate a disgusting place by a lot of standards? Sure. Think about it though, how do some people view this movement? Where should you stand when it comes to the free flow of speech and opinions? I can't speak for you but I don't think t…
/r/MensRights10/06/15 10:12 PM
5

...remember when a business was interested in doing business, making money, and serving their customers to the best of their ability but not social engineering or pretend social justice?
/r/MensRights02/06/15 04:41 PM
9

It's raining sideways!
/r/MensRights02/06/15 02:10 AM
10

Because we've eradicated all violent crimes, as well as thefts. We're down to having them do social engineering to justify drawing pay in this peaceful world.
/r/MensRights31/05/15 06:59 PM
63

While true, they will say the people/girls/trans/three headed sloths/etc that she represents are not. Thus no racism or sexism occurred. The way they'll spin it is fucking stupid and not the least bit logical, but Im much more surprised that they couldn't get more signatures from students.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 02:45 AM
205

They don't see, or won't acknowledge the parallel. It's that whole power+prejudice bullshit they have redefined racism and sexism to be.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 02:26 AM
7

the us should probably invade Only 5k barrels of oil production per day....we're not interested thanks /s
/r/MensRights22/05/15 02:38 AM
45

So when some one calls me a cis-gendered white privileged male scum instead of addressing my argument, the will be banned right? Of course they won't be banned you shitlord bully! Always sitting there waving your privledge around /s Seriously I expect that kind of censorship to be a one way street and not in the favor of actual equality but instead in favor of social justice and morality based on teh feelzz. While reddit hasn't been a free-speech site, it being privately owned and having valid h…
/r/MensRights20/05/15 06:13 PM
3

Nebraska. Well there is your problem, and the proximity to Kansas isn't likely to do you any favors. /s Just take it down and trash it or walk over to the girls bathroom and post it there. Add a note to the bottom about keeping their sexist, misandry propaganda to themselves.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 03:08 PM
14

Universities are the worst place for lowering standards based on their "politically correct" viewpoints. I've personally just been passed over for graduate funding at my university, which didn't bother me until I found out they did give funding to a girl that couldn't even make the admittance requirements.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 03:02 PM
19

and she'll take them all at the drop of any hat....except a jimmy hat
/r/MensRights13/04/15 03:05 PM
24

I really want to see the counter study done about men as well. Because frankly, in my experience, academia attracts a lot of self centered, self serving, and self righteous cunts of either gender. My experience might be biased due to the twats I've had to deal with as profs though...
/r/MensRights03/04/15 02:18 AM
2

unlikely as the screen is normally a major source of battery drain. However, if you are recording hi-res video storage space might become an issue.
/r/MensRights01/03/15 07:10 PM
1

The ONLY reason Australian courts are involved at all, is due to parental kidnapping Agreed. I mean shit if we go by plans alone someone owes me a lot of money because I planned to be rich right? She knew before leaving it wasn't ok or she wouldn't have had to sneak out. They pulled her off the plan and they were informed, and presumably informed her, that the father did not want the child taken away. The last thing that gets me about the justifications I have read is that he should move to Aust…
/r/MensRights17/02/15 07:19 AM
21

"We had received authorization from both the RCMP and … the Australian consulate authorities who cleared the passenger and child to travel the following day," said Air Canada spokesperson See this part of the article really makes me think she gave the consulate that story about abuse and they bought it. The consulate then smoothed everything over to get her to Australia having the police violate the law in the process. Edit: I've looked for either a report on the australia court case or the cour…
/r/MensRights16/02/15 07:16 PM
26

Hopefully they just think it's cool and aren't actually pursuing or have obtained a degree in it. I would hate to see the "Equality in Building Materials Bridge", because as you know marshmallows are as valid as steel....
/r/MensRights11/02/15 04:38 PM
40

*holds up sign* I need meninism because people don't approve of satire
/r/MensRights07/02/15 07:19 PM
3

staple countering arguments all over it Should have, or grabbed a spray can and painted bigotry/biased/racist/sexist all over it.
/r/MensRights26/01/15 07:04 PM
1

There are so many things wrong with this type of bullshit.... The whole class privilege for college irritates the fuck out of me. I have taken out loans and worked my ass off, without help from anyone, to go and finish college. Anyone who thinks its a class thing to go is an idiot and wrong. And cis, or cisgender, just bugs the fuck out of me on principle. A made-up word to use as a condescending slur for something we already have a word, heterosexual, to describe.
/r/MensRights26/01/15 06:50 PM
10

I'm failing to see how this is a men's rights issue. A freedom of expression issue maybe, if they don't have additional evidence aside from his music. I swear I remember other cases for crimes based on the "confessions" derived from music lyrics though....
/r/MensRights24/01/15 02:25 PM
1

So terrible sample size, surveying only men, convoluted questions, and expecting people to take such a ridiculous survey seriously anyway.... Thank god we have soft sciences to shed light on this horrible problem! /s
/r/MensRights18/01/15 01:44 AM
4

Yeah, Im not moving to your country because they censor video games. In a country where every single piece of wildlife seems to want to kill and eat you, make-believe is too violent....
/r/MensRights10/01/15 05:20 AM
4

Yeah, I've had that service for a couple years and I like it a lot. Atm though it was allowed to expire. Soon as I can afford another year's sub it will be reactivated. Edit: besides there are plenty of ways around it, even a chrome addon that sets my country or origin elsewhere. Just bugs me that I have to do that sort of thing.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 11:57 PM
53

Blocked in my country.... Well fine!
/r/MensRights09/01/15 10:31 PM
0

Yeah, because it can't be that I'm older and have gone back to college or anything of that sort.
/r/MensRights10/12/14 04:39 PM
4

Why can't it be both? Too many women view marriage as a way to achieve social status or a lifestyle. Hell spend an hour on my college campus(especially in the presence of the sorority types) and you can see that many of them are just here to get an MRS degree hitching their wagon to one they assume will be successful. The court system rewards this bullshit behavior that when the relationships fall apart they will get pay outs and custody.
/r/MensRights09/12/14 03:09 PM
-3

Because it's pretty obvious we aren't talking about the "Oh shit the condom broke!" type scenario. Many birth control methods are in the high 90% range for effectiveness when used correctly. I was specifically addressing poor forethought and manipulative actions.
/r/TheRedPill08/12/14 03:29 PM
5

clearly sees and cares about the consequences of her actions After the fact takes appropriate action to avert those consequences Once again after the fact, and is avoiding responsibility that the actions brought on. The only thing I will give them credit for is having the ability to take such steps and having the sense to realize they probably should.
/r/TheRedPill08/12/14 01:45 PM
3

doesn't want real life consequences Fits into the bad choices, and planning too. Be wary of a girl that cant see, or doesn't give a shit about, the consequences of actions.
/r/TheRedPill08/12/14 12:24 PM
1

I don't see why CNN is getting all bent out of shape because of the truth. Hell even here on the University of Alabama campus we have gotten a bunch of UAPD messages sent to all students this semester about attempted muggings and assualts of girls, only to wait a week and have them redacted by the "victim". People lie and that's just fact. Anyone will lie about anything at all, but to say that in this one area women are beyond reproach ignores fundamentals of human behavior.
/r/TheRedPill13/11/14 05:42 AM
2

Same reason a lot of shitty people dont get fired. As long as he is enforcing the status quo of his peers they dont see a problem with it.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 02:02 AM
3

This seems like it belongs in /r/gaming as well, why aren't any gamergate threads allowed there? I'm not sure if its the reason, but the first GG post that hit in gaming was nuked by at least one mod implicated in being involved in the coverup and twitter posts with Quinn of a questionable nature were uncovered between the two. I dunno the outcome of that as I lost interest in talking about a cheating sjw troll pretty quickly.
/r/MensRights07/10/14 12:55 PM
5

I really can't make myself give.two shits about what she thought of these shirts. What does disturb me is how an off campus something has fuck all to do with the university. When I leave campus that's where their jurisdiction ends with me too.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 05:04 PM
45

I don't think its inadvertent at all. Look at what and who they target with a lot of their bullshit and think if on a normal day you would actually see a majority of those groups oppressing women? Absolutely not. Modern feminism is a sjw filled joke with a huge victim complex. They perpetuate bullshit until a group lashes back at them and then play the 'see I told you' victim card.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 12:16 PM
3

A woman and judge who should both be brought to a firing squad. Sadly not surprising verdict though
/r/TheRedPill11/08/14 09:53 PM
3

...wait...is that Jenny McCarthy? On what basis would anyone listen to what she has to say about anything? I don't think she has any secondary education, she's best known for showing her tits in playboy, and worst she's an anti-vaccine nut. I don't see anything useful ever being heard from her mouth honestly, she's just nice to look at.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/14 02:50 AM
13

Disrupting people's lives is a punishment, especially when others make inferences about the police presence. More to the point there is nothing stopping police from telling anyone who asked they were there because they suspect 'Bob' of sexual crimes. Without even the charges and court case this can make a person a pariah without recourse. Is the next step a suspected sex crime registry?
/r/MensRights20/07/14 08:35 PM
123

I'm having a hard time with some of the replies from you guys. Sure the girl sent pictures, and sure in all fairness if the boy is charged she should be too...but fuck that these are kids and neither one should be facing this kind of bullshit, it was consented and commited by both and they were in a dating relationship of some kind. Should they be sat down and told they shouldn't do this? Abso-fucking-lutely. Should either of them be facing a possible life time of being looked at under a microsc…
/r/MensRights09/07/14 04:28 PM
17

Obviously it was intimidation when he bought her a drink in a crowded bar and smiled at her
/r/MensRights08/07/14 09:00 PM
11

No one else woukd have touched it, and fox is no more ridiculous than the others just ridiculous to the right instead of ridiculous to the left.
/r/TheRedPill07/07/14 07:57 PM
1

The only part right about that tweet would be that last line "This is not difficult". Pity the rest of it is so utterly backwards and ignorant.
/r/MensRights22/06/14 03:05 PM
2

Is Reddit turning into Tumblr? Hasn't it been Tumblr for quite a while?
/r/TheRedPill08/05/14 02:33 AM
14

Doesn't the first amendment protect the AVFM from any copyright claims? Absolutely not, why would it? The first amendment only dictates what the government can and cannot do when it comes to a persons exercise of speech. I don't think they have any real ground to stand on with the claim it is even material that can be copyrighted, and it might fall under public domain being part of what im sure is an investigation...but there is nothing to stop them from sueing and letting a court decide
/r/MensRights24/04/14 05:28 PM
7

While tipping fedora
/r/MensRights12/03/14 11:46 PM
18

27M PhD....35F fattie.... Does not compute. I mean fuck if you're not going to have some standards at least have some fucking pride. If you want a fattie get a young fattie at least.
/r/TheRedPill05/03/14 02:57 AM
3

My ex and I had a joint account solely for bills, and I purposely told them not to issue checks, to issue one debit card to me, and disable overdraft "protection" so the card would be declined if it was used for more than what was I the account. It never had money just sitting in it to take, I would get money from her and put it in the account with my half to immediately pay the rent for the current semester. Bills would be split as they came I and money put intothe account to pay them. Basicall…
/r/TheRedPill17/02/14 07:03 PM
3

you are weak, you are just as spineless of a loser as your father, which is why I cheated on him in the first place. . Have a nice life indeed, you will never amount to anything without me. Sounds like the kid said the right thing to me, and fuck a mother for saying such things. Because if she's saying it now she was thinking it for a long LONG time
/r/TheRedPill03/02/14 12:53 PM
3

Miss Havisham was stood up at her wedding and therefore hated men, so she raised Estella (her niece or something) to hate all men and to break their hearts on purpose by leading them on because she was such a broken, shrivelled up old vag. Yeah I didn't remember the why but I remembered the core theme. Its happening now sans the left at the altar part. The women teach their daughters, or young female family members, that men are only useful for what they can get out of them and what they can/wil…
/r/TheRedPill28/12/13 11:07 PM
15

I'm saying it seems to be getting worse, a loop of sorts. Its been a while since I read it so maybe I'm misremembering the book, but it seems young women are the vain and self absorbed and grow into the old crone once the looks go and after a divorce or three. They then take out their own misguided ideas of why they are alone and unhappy and shaoe the next generation into themselves, whether consciously or not. I've seen it in my mother bad mouthing men to her neices, I've seen it in female frie…
/r/TheRedPill28/12/13 10:48 PM
13

Honestly looking at history since the women's rights movement started, but mostly focusing the last 40 years, we're already a generation or more into that mess if you think about it.
/r/TheRedPill28/12/13 10:22 PM
51

Its fucking expected is what gets me. I'm in my early thirties but thankfully going back to college and being reasonably intelligent I get to pick up the young 20somethings. I still get introduced to these "older" women my age through friends who try to sell me on the idea that I need to settle dowb with someone my age and mature. The most recent was a 31 year old with 3 kids and 2 failed marriages. Berated me when I laughed at her offer to "let me" take her out. Evidently I'm a womanizing creep…
/r/TheRedPill13/12/13 06:47 PM
30

A lot of it not worth hearing
/r/MensRights10/12/13 03:02 PM
4

The problem with that logic is it would make all sperm and egg donors as well as surrogates liable for child support. As the support is the "right" of the child even the state's laws could fall into question about legally done operations as to a denial of rights of a third party.
/r/MensRights02/12/13 02:59 PM
2

Something something shitlord!
/r/MensRights01/12/13 03:57 PM
1

Duluth Model - Who ever is more distraught by the proceedings Women will get the benefit of the proceedings. I guess this could fall under the Duluth Model, I didn't think about that....
/r/MensRights25/11/13 04:34 PM
4

until lesbians start getting divorced Id like to make one prediction on that. You're going to see which ever one can appear to be more feminine coming out with the better deal. If enough of those divorces happen you will see what goes on in divorce now with the added phase of trying to make the other one come off as less feminine than they are back and forth mud slinging. I hope to share in your popcorn
/r/MensRights24/11/13 10:43 PM
6

“There’s a 5-year-old child here,” Mirabelli said. “Imagine how a child feels when your father says he feels emotionally damaged by your birth.” This is the one argument that really shouldnt stand about this case imo. Not only does the child's feeling not excuse the fraud, but consider it the other way too. There is a child that someday is going to find out what its mother did cause this story will still be online long after. How fucked up is it going to be when they find that shit out and have …
/r/TheRedPill19/11/13 01:00 AM
3

I was around the same age when my mother divorced my father. I still have memories of the goings on during that time and strongly resent my mother for what I saw her do to this day. Other later issues forced me to cut off contact with her but what I remember from then played a huge roll in building up to it. It began with cheating on my father and during the final days she yelled and screamed accusing my father of abuse and rape. Understand anyone who knows him knows my father wouldn't harm anyo…
/r/TheRedPill14/11/13 05:09 PM
1

Im pretty sure it's actually defined to start at the date of supposed injury/crime but with certain exceptions for persons who are not aware of it for much later. It would be up to the interpretation of how things are written locally I think.
/r/MensRights13/11/13 06:52 PM
2

Think you meant tome....unless the tome is in a tomb, or there is an inscription on the tomb itself.... I'm not really up on this whole reading thing, Ill wait for the movie or you can tell us what you find out
/r/MensRights13/11/13 06:43 PM
2

Political ideology shifts with time. Go back and look at what conservative and socialist meant in europe in the during pre and early industrial revolution, also remember democrats were formerly the ones in favor of slavery and yet now carry most minority vote, and there are plenty of other examples. Also there are people who claim some political standing but don't actually conform to it. They change with the time and issue and really need a date connotation along with the political belief/ideolo…
/r/MensRights13/11/13 04:03 PM
3

Barring some magical jimmy hat it's probably just going to sit there, harming no one. FTFY I never understood this story even when it was current. How ever does a giant snow penis encite anything but giggles?
/r/MensRights13/11/13 03:58 PM
4

I don't think that's the "whole" point...but definitely an added bonus
/r/TheRedPill13/11/13 02:16 PM
3

If it really bugs you I would check locally because there might be something at work here aside from a bias by the insurance. If either local(state) laws are forcing them to not charge women for these services or some local organization is ponying up the money it would normally cost to cover it for only women. If it is indeed just the insurance agency that's pretty fucked up considering the difference in procedures for their complexity and recovery. Not saying either of the first reasons are rig…
/r/MensRights06/11/13 02:14 PM
1

It can not be a victim's fault and they still can have acted stupidly.
/r/MensRights18/10/13 11:09 PM
12

You...I like you I agree wholeheartedly. Being aware that life has risks is just good sense. Furthermore I like the robbery analogy because that's what it boils down to. Some people are either amoral, or opportunist(or a variety of other things too) and will do what they want regardless of known consequences or how it affects someone. Theft is the great example where it has been outlawed by every culture for thousands of years. Yet it hasn't stopped and we don't leave doors unlocked because we'r…
/r/TheRedPill18/10/13 08:32 PM
1

I just asked myself that same question. I live in Alabama and haven't heard anything about this which strikes me as a bit odd for something that would be controversial and probably a humans rights issue too. Edit: I totally stand ashamed and horrified. Seems legit according to the states prefiled bills for the house... http://alisondb.legislature.state.al.us/acas/ViewPrefiledBillsACASLogin.asp
/r/MensRights17/10/13 07:50 PM
1

doesn't seem like anyone has uploaded it to the inevitable places it will show up yet. I want to see if it's true she was laughing and posing and all that shit. If so the police need to beat her with a nightstick and haul her ass up on charges ಠ_ಠ
/r/TheRedPill17/10/13 12:45 AM
6

If that happened and I was on the jury, I'd vote not guilty Jury nullification can be a powerful tool
/r/TheRedPill16/10/13 10:11 PM
1

Cash out, and let the bank account run dry. Can't take what isn't there.
/r/MensRights16/10/13 09:54 PM
2

Id rather be jobless and homeless than locked up honestly. Just dont get found/caught after you default and you're golden
/r/MensRights16/10/13 04:39 PM
2

They'll just jail you for not paying in that case
/r/MensRights16/10/13 03:10 PM
4

but not the first verbal sign. So that's still rape, is it not? What if he's hard of hearing or deaf?! OMG!!! How can you be so insensitive!!!! This poor poor man is in jail somewhere all over a medical condition! Have you no shame?! /s
/r/MensRights20/05/13 06:27 PM
6

Nah post is still up, this is a committed troll on a new account. They have nothing to lose. Good to know there is a copy up somewhere now though.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 06:23 PM
3

Oh man the reading skills keep getting worse. Please point out where I said any of that. I said he stopped at the first visible sign, and then had to explain to you the difference between visual and auditory. It was stated in her story they were both impaired by heavy drinking.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 06:22 PM
25

it's pretty obvious it's a troll, just look at the creation date of the account and lots of what they're saying. I just think the defending of it is hilarious.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 06:15 PM
4

See there you go unable to read again Visible != Verbal
/r/MensRights20/05/13 06:13 PM
17

You know what, I had a big long reply but it's easier just to call you an idiot. He stopped at the first visible sign of distress She claims large amounts of alcohol were drunk by the both of them and we all know alcohol impairs brain function and I could go on and talk all about perceptions of time during distress and alcohol intoxication but hell why bother when you're starting point is that of presumed guilt and not innocence.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 06:08 PM
12

Have multiple times, but you want me to explain it to you? I wasn't into it from the start, and about 5 minutes in I ask him to stop. Singular. Stating she asked him to stop once after sex had been ongoing for 5 minutes and she had not been into it. He didn't. Indicating he did not stop when asked. This went on for about a minute until I started crying and freaking out. Sex continued for a minute until she started crying. At which point.... He stopped. When he became aware of her distress he sto…
/r/MensRights20/05/13 05:49 PM
13

No, she goes on to state he didn't stop and the sex continued for a minute afterwards before she freaked out. I ask him to stop Singular.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 05:35 PM
16

She clearly stated that she told him to stop several times I ask him to stop Horse shit, she didn't say she told him multiple times
/r/MensRights20/05/13 05:30 PM
3

As a current student I have to say that every year I apply for a metric ton of scholarships, and if I just had woman bits it would open up a lot more to be applied for. Frankly it bugs me since there is one big pool everyone jumps in and fights for the same money, but then there are a multitude of smaller less crowded ones certain people can go and have less of a fight in addition to the big one. Basically more chances for them to get money. They're all private scholarships so really they can gi…
/r/MensRights17/05/13 04:38 PM
10

I'm simply saying that we have our own shame Why [It's/He's] even being considered is just beyond me Yeah....So you didn't agree with his policies and background, and somehow that's shameful for all of us? Yet I still don't recall Romney proposing any gender biased opinions on this level. Please tell me of your tolerant objective opinions! /s Maybe it's best if you phrase things like that in terms of yourself instead of trying to speak for everyone and indicating people should be ashamed of thei…
/r/MensRights14/05/13 01:03 PM
17

He's trying to equate Romney's(I think) presidential bid to the outlandishness of this law. I fail to see any connection since in my knowledge I don't remember Romney running on a platform of so obvious a gender bias.
/r/MensRights14/05/13 12:46 PM
3

Anyway your post is completely useless and missing the point yeah...kindly go fuck yourself too. I believe you are the one who said No it does not. DV is when they are together, wether they live under the same roof or not.(Unless they broke up a VERY short time ago then it could under some circumstances fall into that) I was just telling you that you were incorrect.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 06:13 PM
2

Unless they broke up a VERY short time ago Not everywhere spells out in the legal definition limits on how long they have been broken up and merely state "former spouse/domestic partner" and "former dating partner".
/r/MensRights26/04/13 04:41 PM
4

That is the definition from the state of Washington specifically, but it's not that much different from other States. How exactly it is written in Victoria I have no idea and I can't find a listing of their laws on the matter as easily as I can pull up States' law. Some places put time limits on former dating relationships such as Oregon, but still it enforces an ex spouse/domestic partner/dating relationship view.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 04:28 PM
7

Depends on how the law is written. Language like this is common from what I have seen. "Family or household members" means spouses, domestic partners, former spouses, former domestic partners, persons who have a child in common regardless of whether they have been married or have lived together at any time, adult persons related by blood or marriage, adult persons who are presently residing together or who have resided together in the past, persons sixteen years of age or older who are presently…
/r/MensRights26/04/13 03:55 PM
6

Turner was jailed for three months ಠ_ಠ For attempted murder, because why else are you attacking someone with a sledge, knife, meat cleaver, and frying pan... That's the part that gets to me. I don't care if you also classify this as DV, because it sure as fuck was attempted murder.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 03:51 PM
3

you savage.... You're supposed to brush after you eat a meal
/r/MensRights27/03/13 03:17 PM
3

Yeah, right up until she pokes holes in the condoms and oops the condom "failed" Don't stick around for abusive bullshittery
/r/MensRights27/03/13 02:26 PM
4

They have people already with that kind of "caliber and integrity", just look at the manipulation of facts and stats to see that. Doesn't seem to hurt them any, and people still flock to that nonsense
/r/MensRights27/03/13 01:18 AM
5

I realize someone will give her a job eventually, but I was having a nice daydream
/r/MensRights27/03/13 12:51 AM
3

At least now with the publicity everyone should know what kind of a fuckwit she is and she can starve quietly in an alleyway somewhere
/r/MensRights26/03/13 10:44 PM
1

I'm confused whether this is portraying a stay at home dad which I would support, or the feminist belief about how all men are only worth what is in their wallets and what we can do for them and their misandric view of men otherwise.
/r/MensRights26/03/13 04:28 PM
0

Even then they are expendable because they aren't providing all of them with money.
/r/MensRights01/03/13 05:58 PM
1

Sure isn't here
/r/MensRights13/02/13 12:56 AM
16

No real shocker there though. When you have no real argument, cry about the wording.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 11:35 AM
73

Don't forget the assertions that it's all a patriarchal plot
/r/MensRights31/01/13 06:18 AM
4

I would rather live in that world too. However, there is no way to control individuals without stripping them of their rights entirely. Bullshit. We have laws against it. You know, the ones you I believe said this about: I do not get what being against the law has to do with it. It is not against the law to have a disagreement. There are against assault however. So by a giant circlejerk we arrive back at the original destination of how the woman is wrong. Thank you, come again
/r/MensRights25/01/13 10:11 PM
4

It is impossible to expect everyone who gets in your way to turn the other cheek. I would rather live in a world where you don't expect everyone to mace you because of a verbal argument. Arguments happen, and they always will. People who decide to take an extra step and assault you over it have impulse control issues.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 09:55 PM
7

I do not get what being against the law has to do with it. The legal consequences to these people's actions do not have any weight in regard to what transpired. Ah, well in that case you feel she would have been well within reason to stab him in the face or shoot him? She assaulted him in a violent act over a verbal altercation. The force she used was not equal to any force or threat he posed. Furthermore as much as you are defending her it was a tit-for-tat episode as she began to drag it out a…
/r/MensRights25/01/13 09:42 PM
3

By all means, if you have a link to this "order" please post it. We would all like to see this evidence instead of copy and pasting the same thing in multiple places as a reply.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 08:50 PM
26

He was at worst being an immature impatient asshole. That is not against the law. They could have argued back and forth until the sun was cold and dead and it still wouldn't have risen to the level of a criminal offense on either of their parts. However, she raised it to a physical assault level. His actions were not at all physical, and instead she chose to escalate it to a physical confrontation. The only one complicit here is the female who assaulted a person because she appears to have self …
/r/MensRights25/01/13 08:49 PM
2

Oh no, that's not surprising. It fucking says that the reasoning behind it is to fund her lifestyle without making her sell something she owns. Greer found that regardless of the contract, “each spouse should be able to continue to live in a fashion that, while not equal, does not require the wife, in this instance, to have to immediately sell her matrimonial home or one or more of the cottages in her name.”
/r/MensRights14/01/13 09:37 PM
14

...trading them in for a lump sum of $7 million and the title to the family home. Fuck maintaining a lifestyle. Anyone who walks away from something with that and still asks for more should see the judge come down off the bench and backhand them before sending them for a psych evaluation. You have 7 million in cash, the marital house, and two cottages....I think you can make it on your own. God knows I could make it for the rest of my life on a fraction of all of that ಠ_ಠ Worst of all she agreed…
/r/MensRights14/01/13 07:20 PM
20

Instances of rape do not equate to number of people raped. That is easily the most asinine statement I have read in a while. An instance of rape, is a rape. If someone is raped twice, two rapes have occurred. If they are raped n times, n rapes have occurred. You are saying only the first time a person is raped will ever matter.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 03:22 AM
14

things they want just happen automatically, some machine just handles it. well shit it literally says that in this trash they wrote, like things don't need upkeep and they will magically work forever understanding of course that we could learn any of mens values, systems and machines (if not their machinations) if we were willing to put the time and effort into it — if men did it, it cant be that hard. i mean really. but we dont have to
/r/MensRights11/01/13 12:29 AM
6

.... You don't negotiate about facts. Either it is true or it's as much propaganda as that bullshit feminists sling around
/r/MensRights08/01/13 07:18 PM
5

I'm not going to worry about it, but I expect it to happen eventually if things don't change.
/r/MensRights02/01/13 05:34 PM
8

and we can help
/r/MensRights21/12/12 07:16 PM
0

Aren't a lot of these shooters results of broken, single female parent homes? I mean if there is to be finger pointing instead of just calling him a disturbed individual, why shouldn't we start at the ones who raise the child? This entire bullshit pisses me off from every angle because there is no acknowledgement that the person made a choice, a mentally ill one but still a choice on his part. The ONLY reasonable dicussion to have over this is one of mental health issues. Instead it's the violen…
/r/MensRights19/12/12 06:07 AM
2

While I don't think you can prove, or disprove they were lesbians....I think the rest of your girlfriend's statement can stand as is. Better to just shorten it and leave out the sexuality reference and call them intolerant piles of shit.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 01:58 AM
2

Yeah... I'm just going to let the collective downvotes you are getting speak for themselves at this point. Good luck with that whole manhoodacademy mentality. The rest of us? We'll just be over here trying to get equal representation and legal footing.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 08:13 PM
6

It is impossible to argue when you don't agree men and women are different other than superficially. No, in fact it's not that hard at all. You keep the arguments geared towards equality and the fact that laws as they are give an unfair and abused legal bias towards women in many areas such as support, custody, allegations of domestic violence and rape, and others.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 07:13 PM
3

feminist white knight MRAs here that believe in fairy tales because they lack experience with women. His own immense personal experience obviously </sarcasm>
/r/MensRights09/12/12 06:21 PM
10

uh huh...So your going with the stance that women are smarter than men and can calculate out a long term plan to harm men, but men cannot do similar because they lack that same conviction or the brain power? Are you sure you're in the right subreddit? No mate, the sexes are slightly different I agree, but in mostly superficial ways. People are people though. Some are cold and calculating piles of shit, and the rest of us just want equal rights and freedom for everyone free from that first group.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 06:08 PM
20

Woman can play a calculating charade of deception far longer than men can. No, just no. Both sexes can do the same thing. Women don't have some higher brain power to plan out these things, just the available legal avenues via alimony support and outrageous child support orders.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 05:45 PM
-2

Bronies are a special breed unto themselves, and feminism won't and isn't going to help them ಠ_ಠ Edit: not sure why I'm getting downvotes, it's not as if I called them gay or something. They are allowed to watch whatever they want, and I'm allowed to think it's strange while still respecting that right. Basic truth of my statement stands, feminism isn't out to help them.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 05:39 PM
0

No when the post starts out "my mother didnt..." that is the problem, no personal responsibility. I'm fairly certain most of us here do not agree with selective services, whether it be for existing or just not being required of women really doesn't matter. From his post he only has a problem now that it might negatively affect hin, and not because he didn't sign up for a moral objection but because mommy didn't do it for him. One reason I could understand and at least agree with the sentiment. H…
/r/MensRights06/12/12 12:39 AM
7

Apparently my mother never sent in... Not anyone else's responsibility but yours, regardless of the legality, illegality, or feelings towards selective services. This is a personal responsibility thing and not others jobs to coddle you into adulthood. It has almost nothing to do with the issues regarding the problems with selective services being what it is. Sucks that you can't get government stuff, but you made the mess so either clean it up or don't. In reality they won't come after you for n…
/r/MensRights05/12/12 02:51 PM
10

I agree that the mensrights people should publicly align with sex offenders. Sex offenders and pedophiles... No. That's as far as I could read before my forehead hit the desk. Objecting to the list on the grounds that these are people who have served their time and should be allowed integration back into society, and on constitutional grounds of ongoing punishment is one thing. Hell I support not making felons list they have ever committed a crime on applications and allowing them to vote where …
/r/MensRights03/12/12 07:47 AM
2

My lic. is suspended as a result of non-payment I've never understood why some places want to make it harder to get and/or keep employment because of owed child support. How does the logic even work that that "Oh well he owes back money, lets pull his license"? A isn't even connected to B ಠ_ಠ Realistically you're going to have to just look around, there are often ads about free legal advice type things for the poor. You're going to just have to go around and talk to people and see which ones are…
/r/MensRights03/12/12 05:22 AM
0

I got maybe halfway through and the sheer stupidity and irrelevant nature of what I was reading made me question my own stance on eugenics ಠ_ಠ
/r/MensRights02/12/12 03:36 PM
1

I'm very sure they are, but on some girls they are unattractive, and even on the ones that have the shape to make them look good it just seems lazy to me ಠ_ಠ So there is no misunderstanding, people can dress however they want of course and I am also allowed to have my opinion about it.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 04:22 AM
3

All I see on campus are yoga pants, as far as the eye can see ಠ_ಠ
/r/MensRights28/11/12 10:48 PM
2

I would like a link as well. All I have found is the ex got the worse oft he beating, partially due to being restrained by security. I have seen a bit about Barry losing in court a request to take their daughter to France, which I absolutely applaud the judge for... However, I don't see any evidence, or even suggestions it was staged. If it was it's a shameful thing to do under any circumstance.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 07:33 PM
1

Could feminists stop putting everything that happens to women under the ever growing umbrella of rape ಠ_ಠ I mean ffs not everything needs to be rape. It does nothing but muddy the water about what rape is, and how serious of a crime it is. We already have names for these things, assault and/or medical malpractice. Further lets assume some of these complaints are valid, and hospitals/doctors are falsifying records and whatnot. That's already a crime in itself and should be reported and investigat…
/r/MensRights24/11/12 06:45 PM
0

No. Swedish policy is a consequence of Swedish Feminism. So this entire argument about the patriot act and Assange was what? A cry for attention? Trolling? Because those things still have dick to do with feminists lobbying. There are much more effective ways of silencing people about things, and that is shaming them. Feminists don't need the patriot act even if they could use it, and they can't. Lets look at what a false accusation does to a person's life to see that fact. You don't use a tool a…
/r/MensRights23/11/12 06:34 AM
0

Look how the "rape culture" hysterics in Sweden were able to get Assange arrested without evidence. They have changed their stories multiple times. So Swedish policy is run by Americans passing of the patriot act... I find your paranoia fascinating and would like to subscribe to your newsletter please
/r/MensRights23/11/12 06:22 AM
2

No, I agree with the sentiment and basic truth of his statement. It makes it irrelevant to this specific post though.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 06:51 PM
2

Some of this was prior to the patriot act, and even the stuff that comes after is not tied to national security. So while I agree the patriot act is a bullshit piece of legislation, it is irrelevant to these issues as they are pushed through via feminist lobbying under the guise of protection and harsh punishment.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 06:38 PM
5

I don't know about other states, but if that's true it doesn't in the least surprise me about Washington. They also have laws on the books that allow someone to merely claim domestic violence, and it doesn't even have to be to the police, not pursue any charges or legal action, and get out of any lease or home loan completely scot free. The problem with this is the law specifically says it doesn't release the accused from said contract and sticks them with the full cost and for the length of the…
/r/MensRights22/11/12 05:49 PM
9

That was amazingly brilliant..... Which is also why I have to call shenanigans, but it was a good read
/r/MensRights13/11/12 03:05 AM
2

I think at the heart it's just changed names is all. Step back in time it would be called racism, because in essence skin color or religion was the major divide of the age. Skip to present day and racism isn't acceptable and you likely have people of all makes and models in your party, so it merely shifted from racial divides to political, economic, and social divides that they split along. Politicians are still only out for themselves first and foremost(whether it be personal gain, or how they …
/r/MensRights07/11/12 04:32 PM
8

Which is different from today's political leaders and margin group leaders how?
/r/MensRights07/11/12 04:11 PM
2

Five-O
/r/MensRights07/11/12 07:27 AM
9

Obviously it isn't male. If it were male it would be welcoming these kind of actions as the article so clearly and unbiasedly states. </sarcasm>
/r/MensRights06/11/12 11:50 AM
16

"I need feminism so that I can keep my last name"
/r/MensRights05/11/12 04:59 PM
5

and that never happens now ಠ_ಠ and you wouldn't be breaking it, you ran on equality, and you're giving them real equality :) just not the "special" equality they were wanting
/r/MensRights02/11/12 03:48 PM
5

Oh but wouldn't it be the most epic of trolls to sneak in under the guise of supporting feminism's idea of equal rights, and then actually doing EQUAL rights
/r/MensRights02/11/12 02:30 PM
1

I wouldn't bet on it, they'll just throw you in jail for contempt when you can't pay an ordered judgement. Even being poor is not a defense.
/r/MensRights27/10/12 03:45 PM
12

We can call ourselves married, go through the ceremony, wear rings, etc. But we will not register with the state as married. Then, if we were to split, there would be no messy divorce. Yeah....I advise him to talk to a lawyer just to be sure about the state laws first. As a matter of fact I would say talk to two and make sure the answers match. Mixing money, dwellings, and calling either other husband wife and having a ceremony, even without registering with the state might be a problem when fac…
/r/MensRights24/10/12 04:59 PM
3

Perhaps it's lower, and I do live in the deep south where numbers regarding anything remotely christian moral based tend to get inflated a bit to stir up additional outrage. /shrug
/r/MensRights24/10/12 04:57 PM
2

I thought we were closer to 70%.... I swear I keep hearing "three quarters of marriages end in divorces" often.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 04:51 PM
23

My SO makes about double what I make and he has no student loans, while I have three. But if he really loved me then he would never ask for it. BWAHAHAHAHAHA! Sign the prenup Marriage for men is more or less a business deal these days, as we lose our asses if it ends and there is nothing fair about divorce and the mudslinging that can/does happen so women can keep their "accustomed lifestyle". You just stated every reason why he wants a prenup, and it's reasonable for him to ask for it with thos…
/r/MensRights24/10/12 04:45 PM
2

This damn system, if a man so much as breathes heavily in a woman's direction during an altercation, he is hauled off to to jail or somewhere else. Yeah, that would bug the shit out of me too. In the case of man on woman DV the locals or state would press charges regardless of the victim's want to or reluctance. Which I agree with, but investigations should be done as some claims are complete BS. If you didn't at the time perhaps you should talk with the police who showed up and explain what was…
/r/MensRights22/10/12 01:33 AM
1

All I see is a broad opinion blog piece there that points a lot to "liberal/left" and muslims but doesn't offer a single or group of cases, or offer hard numbers.
/r/MensRights21/10/12 01:29 AM
0

Could we get some studies and articles to back it up than? Cause without that it does just sound like it. I have heard similar things said about crime and rape, especially concerning african americans and hispanic immigrants in my lifetime, but doesn't prove true by the numbers.
/r/MensRights20/10/12 11:06 PM
8

I swear people used to get into college, and into the nice jobs based on merit...or maybe that was just a childhood dream I had once
/r/MensRights19/10/12 07:47 PM
3

and some of us can understand both
/r/MensRights19/10/12 01:00 AM
4

Be careful about #1 and check local law. Some US states are strict two party consent states and others are not or depend on the location.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 03:30 AM
1

Came here to complain about dailymail being a source...you stopped me in my tracks ಠ_ಠ have an upvote
/r/MensRights16/10/12 10:12 PM
1

What'd it say? O.o
/r/MensRights16/10/12 01:56 PM
2

Don't feed the trolls
/r/MensRights16/10/12 01:55 PM
4

It would take a much larger effort to take down mensrights, because you are right that the pictures would be totally out of place. With that said however, a dozen or so people running a couple accounts each who co-ordinate could cause an issue by posting extremely offensive material advocating rapes, beatings, "insert offensive femnazi opinion of MRM here". If it worked it would at least make us pick up and move subs, or get the whole thing banned at worst. However, it could also sign their own …
/r/MensRights16/10/12 01:46 PM
3

Usernames tend to be sarcastic on reddit. I have no idea what you are talking about
/r/MensRights16/10/12 01:39 PM
3

Hour old account, asking a sub that is setup for pursuit of equality for advice about getting out of responsibility.....yeah, I'm sure this is legit. If it is your child, you are responsible in a legal sense if she pursues it, regardless of her nationality. More to the point though, this is not the place to be asking this stuff. Might I suggest /r/law for legal questions. We're here to discuss issues of equality where it impacts men.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 06:22 PM
8

Have you seen the video? Have you? Speaking as someone who is actually licensed to drive a bus what she was doing while the bus was in motion by distracting and attacking the driver was a threat to everyone on that bus, and innocent bystanders nearby. Should he have handled it differently, maybe. Lets face facts though we have a good 10 minutes of video where she was harassing the driver and she struck him first. I'm ok with his response because unlike her he had the good sense to stop the bus a…
/r/MensRights14/10/12 08:45 PM
-1

Well multiple other places say 16, when I'm not on my phone I will go track down actual WI law but as is from what I read in articles the problem was she was under the age of consent and he was not
/r/MensRights11/10/12 06:05 PM
-3

Other stories confirm this, the consent age was 16 the girl was 14. I can't seem to find anything about this being a bf/gf scenario or something else though. Regardless of that the likely outcome will be they attempt to throw the book at a minor by charging him as an adult for a pretty serious sex crime if history is any indication.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 01:38 PM
58

And instead of standing his ground on the comment he bows to pressure and backpedals like a typical politician from what he actually believes and is true about his comment. Disgusting There was no misunderstanding what he said, that some girls will lie about it. Not that he doesn't understand what rape is, only that people are people. Some people will lie to cover their own asses, and some people will lie to try and get what they want, and some people will lie just to fuck with other people whet…
/r/MensRights11/10/12 11:52 AM
14

You only get away with that because their mother was a hamster and their father smelt of elderberries
/r/MensRights11/10/12 01:01 AM
-4

I guess that is true, but... You only look at the front page? I am disappoint
/r/MensRights10/10/12 10:00 PM
95

If that is the case they are cowards of the first order. Seriously why does anyone give the SRSers anything but a laugh in their direction? The only power they actually have is given to them by reddit itself and comes from threats or incessant bitching. edit: they also have the downvote brigades, but those really only matter if you care about your internet points
/r/MensRights10/10/12 09:54 PM
8

Fuck yeah! This should be the standard, and combine it with paternity testing of newborns as well so we don't get to this teenage/adult paternity point to begin with. People who say stupid things like the one comment "He needs a lesson in what it means to be a father", seriously irritate me. He was lied to about the child being his from the beginning. The fact that this so called woman couldn't fess up to not knowing who the real father was or chose to lie and have someone else take care of the …
/r/MensRights05/10/12 10:46 PM
1

In the sense that all discrimination is bad maybe.... But since it has nothing to do with gender discrimination or a men's right issue, I would be inclined to agree this is not the place for it.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 12:52 AM
7

I'm just curious as hell as to why they asked "gay married guy" about it. I mean talk about having no horse in the race. Top that gem off with the other two and you have the typical stereotype, beer, bacon, and we'll say/do anything for sex. The whole of it is just disgusting.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 06:47 PM
15

I don't remember the exact details but basic premise is: This group of animals are left on a farm(I think the farmers were killed by the animals but Im not 100%), and develop their own system of equality. At first it seems ok, and they write "All Animals are equal" on the wall of the barn to signify exactly that, and a few other rules. As time goes on the pigs take over and want special privilege modifying the writing to say "some are more equal than others". I honestly don't remember how it end…
/r/MensRights22/09/12 04:20 PM
6

You somehow misspelled "special privilege" as "equality" Understandable mistake I guess
/r/MensRights22/09/12 03:42 PM
22

Wasn't required by mine at any point, and I graduated some 14 years ago when we still had to read a lot, no ebooks, no text to speach, slow computers..... Even I have read this book though. Seems a spot on comparison to me
/r/MensRights22/09/12 03:40 PM
1

I'm pretty sure he meant dry in the sense that there was no vaginal fluid on it ever, and therefore a lack of a lot of DNA. Still are they going to even look that close while they are cutting what is likely to be a very bloody on the inside piece of plastic off of an accused rapist?
/r/MensRights21/09/12 12:28 AM
2

This thing is no laughing matter, it has to be removed surgically. So yes someone could use it as a prank and then the guy is fucked, and to get out of paying the bills she just says it was rape and claim the evidence was on his penis.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 06:37 PM
2

If it isn't a rapist, then that women is guilty of rape and assault with a weapon. Except this still wouldn't solve the issues of the falsely accused. Say she forgot it because(drunk, forgetful, insert reason here). We have already seen the regretful actions while drunk lead to rape allegations, hell we even have laws on the books and precedent cases where if a woman is drunk she sexual contact is rape. Nothing to stop her from crying rape to get out of jail free as the saying goes if this gets …
/r/MensRights20/09/12 06:31 PM
7

You just want one of them to pull your pin and count to 5
/r/MensRights14/09/12 02:52 AM
1

Minus the children and marriage, I have been in much the same spot with an ex and the police. They refused to get involved when my ex was allowed by the landlord into my apartment and stole or trashed a lot of my stuff. They consistently said it was a "civil matter"(in a state without common law Im not sure how they even justified that) and refused to pursue charges against my ex or landlord at the time. I however agree with ZimbaZumba and if you live in a moderate to large sized area try to get…
/r/MensRights12/09/12 03:01 PM
17

It isn't about embarrassing the kids, it's about protecting them. If this woman is ready to wield a knife to deny him his rights as a father what else will she do? That is a nutcase who shouldn't have custody of the children, and regardless of "embarrassment" to them, it is for the good of the children that he not only be given his rights but that she not be allowed to violate them in psycho ways by waving a weapon around and destruction of property.
/r/MensRights12/09/12 02:56 PM
8

If it's fulfilling a required gen ed and the atmosphere feels hostile towards your gender it could be argued that it is being hindered. Regardless though pick your battles, if all you want to do is get out and failing this monstrosity of a class will keep you from it I would seriously think before making too many waves over it unless you truly feel strongly about the idea
/r/MensRights11/09/12 10:51 PM
10

No it isnt, you are allowed to record the audio of classes you have paid for. Video recording might be another matter but audio recording of classes have been happening since the 80s at least. Just dont hide it, put the recorder directly on your desk in plain view
/r/MensRights11/09/12 04:42 PM
77

This And if the course is renamed Women's Studies request that a Men's studies course be added. Probably wont fly but at least follow through to the logical end of that line.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 04:33 PM
9

Understanding what and why it is happening does not equal support of it.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 11:02 PM
13

Exactly. There are also male judges giving slaps on the wrist to women for major criminal offenses as well. Don't try and point out that the judge is female like the defendant, point out the sentence is bullshit regardless of who imposed it. Don't try and add extra stuff you can't really prove on top of something that can stand alone on it's own bullshit merit.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 09:42 PM
70

Not to piss on the parade, but unless you have some hard evidence that the judge was biased because the defendant was female due to the judge being female you're doing nothing but what feminists do spouting the same bullshit that all men have each others back, rape culture nonsense. This isn't an isolated thing, and even male judges go easier on female defendants than on males and we've seen plenty of articles posted in this sub in regards to it. Women much more often get lighter sentences than …
/r/MensRights29/08/12 03:21 PM
2

They've already stated why they are doing it. Our extensive linguistic research shows that the majority of people They are catering to groups and their sense of what is believed or not.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 03:55 PM
3

It gets downvoted so it's not sitting at the top, as is the case right now. It does serve a purpose, but it's a bot so what it's count is means nothing. Better to have actual commenters who might have something to add above it and seen.
/r/MensRights18/08/12 06:07 AM
2

The problem here doesn't seem to be that there are laws to support that the definition is wrong. Rather ...most laws and scholars define it that way. I doubt Oxford is going to change it without some radical attention drawn to the issue or a majority agreement on the matter sadly.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 05:10 AM
3

I was wondering the same thing
/r/MensRights15/08/12 04:07 PM
2

We make examples of people all the time in this justice system. I say we go back to "eye for an eye" thoughts on this matter. You ruin someone's life with a lie, your life is then forfeit. Instead we don't even charge or prosecute these people under the guise of impeeding other people from coming forward. We're not talking about questionable testimony, we are talking about a woman who outright lied with the intent of monetary gain at the cost of someone else's freedom and liberty.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 09:11 PM
4

I think the comments they have made to other editors as well as their own contributions page tells the whole story here. The talk on the State of Louisiana v. Frisard seems to be that there is no cause for the assumed bias and the header will be removed unless a valid concern can be raised by tomorrow.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 06:19 AM
4

I don't know if there are reasonable ones, but the few I have come across who seem to troll the place must be the most worthless humanity has to offer. One in particular I will always remember. I found an error one night on a page and ended up getting into a change/revert fight with one such waste of flesh. Even after I provided factual proof the article was incorrect as written they continually reverted it back. I finally got sick of it and had better things to do with my time. Such is the prob…
/r/MensRights09/08/12 05:17 AM
3

It sucks, and I have dealt with the same thing having started to grow my hair out at the age of 15. You can find a lot of places willing to overlook it, especially if you can build up a good set of references. While it is bias because it allows different dress codes for the genders, it mostly goes back to the thoughts about presenting a professional image and what people think it means. The company or store manager/owner wanting to put forth a clean cut image to the public or merely being unwill…
/r/MensRights08/08/12 11:34 PM
10

Forget election cycles, I hope the people who voted him in get him out with some kind of special vote or call for a resignation and damned soon. There is utterly no justification for this outburst and the man shouldn't be judging a dog contest, let alone the right and wrong of human beings.
/r/MensRights07/08/12 09:44 PM
5

They are playing the card because they can. It is not their fault for playing the game Uhh, Yes it is their fault for playing such a fucked up position. You shouldn't do things just because you can. There are tons of things I can go out and do and mess with people's day and lives legally. Doesn't mean I do or should, and the fact is I don't because there is at least a level of respect for my fellow man based on them just existing.
/r/MensRights03/08/12 03:09 AM
1

Oh wait, you're right....I have to say I did get one or two messages from that guy. My previous statement is incorrect about not getting any nasty PMs. ಠ_ಠ He is the only one though. Did he ever go away? I can't say I've seen a post by him in at least a few days. It seemed like he was throwing out a new account once or twice a day for a while there.
/r/MensRights02/08/12 12:23 AM
3

Never gotten a threat or nasty PM from a redditor, only encouraging ones. Even the SRS stooges don't PM me anything nasty which is kind of amazing since I've made their wall on a few occasions. Have had my username specifically called out on some radfem blog site though
/r/MensRights01/08/12 09:55 PM
1

That's where one of the loopholes come in though, he'd already had the trial and been ordered to pay. In this instance that's where the contempt of court comes in and jails him. Failure to comply with a lawful order is contempt of court, trial has already happened. Just like anyone who gets convicted and if they don't comply will have this leveled at them. However, there needs to be some kind of oversight, or checks and balances. This isn't a singular incident where someone has been jailed for e…
/r/MensRights29/07/12 06:41 PM
1

Unfortunately it doesn't. While jailing for debt is against our principles, he was jailed for contempt of the court. A charge that is meant to make people more cooperative, but has been used basically as a form of imprisonment because a judge is pissed at you. It's your basic loophole that needs to be sealed the fuck shut, but no challenge has effectively done it ಠ_ಠ
/r/MensRights29/07/12 06:25 PM
6

Don't feed the trolls
/r/MensRights29/07/12 03:09 AM
1

"instructing the ignorant." That sounds like one of those MHA threads. I can't say that I have ever seen anything similar in the sub. However, I don't see this place as ever becoming an SRS without the mods undergoing some drastic change and the members doing likewise. Bans aren't handed down to keep people quiet or for having a different opinion, and most threads seem reasonable(though I can point to a few where the reading and understanding skills need to be improved a bit).
/r/MensRights27/07/12 02:02 PM
7

I saw that article, and that line of thinking was total bullshit. He qualified, won it, and the ensuing shitstorm didn't get enough notice at the time. Of course the setting up anything like that in which the color of your skin or background counts for more than achievements is bullshit. As a current college student I can't tell you how much that shit bugs me when I am begging and groveling for aid while I have kept a gpa I am proud of, but if I want any sort of aid I don't have to pay back I'm …
/r/MensRights27/07/12 01:54 PM
4

the Irish. Do I get the pass for being of Irish descent too? I really hate that sort of logic though, it flies in the face of fairness and personal responsibility. Regardless of what their past is the choice to do any such acts is still a choice and they are responsible for making it.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 01:48 PM
4

I don't know, but it was a bad idea. I really liked the book, and the movie just boiled it down to any other "aliens took over the planet, lets take it back" theme. Edit: now I have a need to go reread the book, it's been some time before the movie that I read it last.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 01:42 PM
4

You're asking a question that cannot be answered given the current state of affairs. I think it's pretty much accepted that this group has those that either have an extreme view not in line with the movement, are not in agreement with the movement, or are actively trying to discredit it. You can only truly call them out when they start showing it. We do it with the MHA posters often enough anyway. We even implemented the RightsBot to copy posts as a deterrent to posting a thread that gets edited…
/r/MensRights27/07/12 01:39 PM
11

The book, and not that horrible movie ಠ_ಠ
/r/MensRights27/07/12 12:10 PM
12

Doing well in the classroom doesn't make anyone infallible, nor a genius. It only shows they have an aptitude for classroom work. If you're looking for a way to soundly defeat her arguments and thereby take her down a peg you're probably going to be disappointed. People with extreme views like that are not usually swayed by reason. Instead of being swayed it tends to make them hold on all the tighter to their viewpoints as a defensive mechanism. You could learn some debating skills and press her…
/r/MensRights25/07/12 02:41 AM
3

We have some of the same types of people on this side of the issue as well. People who will denounce you for being reasonable are not those who can be reasoned with. Men's Rights and Feminism are two sides of the same coin, which is gender equality. Each side with it's extremists, and each side with it's reasonable. With each side now days constantly complaining about how much the other side is always on top. Both sides need to drop the "we have it this bad..." rhetoric, and militant ideas about…
/r/MensRights25/07/12 02:22 AM
-1

Oh goodie, now we're talking measured responses for certain conditions. So I deserve violence if I'm an asshole. Specifically just me, or are we talking any random asshole? What constitutes an asshole? Let's quantify this to see the scale. Maybe there is a grey area, or maybe just a single tipping point. I keep hearing people be called assholes for parking crooked in a space. We should beat these people who park crooked too right? I mean they are assholes by certain peoples definition after all.…
/r/MensRights24/07/12 06:01 AM
-1

Battery - The harmful or offensive touching of any part of another personÂ’s body or of something, such as clothing or carried umbrella, that is so closely attached to the person that it is customarily regarded as part of the person. The touching may be in anger or a result of some other intentional wrong. Any amount of touching is considered a battery, even if harmless, if it is offensive to the person who is touched. So we can see that... Anyone Anytime can grab my wrist, no law prohibits this…
/r/MensRights24/07/12 05:44 AM
-1

That's you saying it's better to blindly assault someone based on your moronic idea of what happened instead of getting the facts and making an informed decision. Once again, nothing in that statement implies a condoning of their violence. It is a statement that says exactly what it says. I would rather people check in(as in ask questions of what is going on) on things that might be going down. In the very next sentence I say that the group in question according to the OP was working under assum…
/r/MensRights24/07/12 05:33 AM
0

You made no arguments in your post. A few statements, attempted parallels, an untrue statement about contact without consent not being a crime, and the boiling down a sequence of entirely separate actions based upon individual choices to a single act by a single person. So I guess my point was that I at least found the idea of a movie holding you hostage slightly amusing :)
/r/MensRights24/07/12 05:13 AM
-1

A movie that has an interesting plot twist, by your very definition, has detained me and is bad. After deciding to leave a theater and a movie attempts to grab you in an attempt to get you to continue watching happens this will be a better argument. Your choice to stay because you liked the plot twist is still a choice. Nothing is stopping you from leaving but that choice. You're misconstruing my arguments.
/r/MensRights24/07/12 04:48 AM
-1

Intent speaks much, and I'll asume you know or can look up Mens rea. Since we have intent because OP clearly states his intent was to keep her focus by grabbing her. So let us, for the sake of it being late, accept that his grabbing her is akin to hugging a SO. Mens rea still applies and we still have intent of his to detain and force her into a course of action of continuing the argument she had already made moves to extract herself from. We're left with his intent to do something knowingly aga…
/r/MensRights24/07/12 04:38 AM
-1

He wasn't just getting her attention though, he'd already had it and she was walking away from said attention. His exact words were to keep her focus The focus she had chosen to no longer give him. Thus he wanted to force the focus back to himself. Detain, to prevent from proceeding.
/r/MensRights24/07/12 03:05 AM
-1

So what? Embezzling money from your employer is wrong too, but an irrelevant detail if the embezzeler is at the movies and someone bursts into the theater and starts tossing live hand grenades. Strawman and red herring, nice double dip on the fallacies. We're not talking about an action that happened to another person at another location. Furthermore the embezzler would still be wrong for embezzling regardless of where he was located. The fact that the sequence of events happened in a row or did…
/r/MensRights24/07/12 02:50 AM
1

All of them obviously lol I guess I don't have that luxury, or I just don't dig too deeply into my googled username. What comes up from mine are the articles and references I chose this name to make fun of. I texted some friends with the link :) I'm still chuckling about it
/r/MensRights24/07/12 02:39 AM
2

Oh that's really quite funny :D I didn't know that I had such a fanbase lol How did you stumble on that gem? It's months old too...Now I gotta go see what I was posting about back then to see if it was worth it.
/r/MensRights24/07/12 02:16 AM
-1

My sense of proportion is not attached to any actions proceeding nor following this action. I merely state that said action is wrong in it's own rights. Also, to lay hands on another person without consent is worlds different from burning a piece of meat. Intentionally laying an unwanted hand upon another individual runs into the realm of misdemeanor crimes and could run up to felony depending on intention and severity. While dead pieces of meat have so such rights and thus burning a roast carri…
/r/MensRights24/07/12 02:11 AM
1

From Websters Hold: transitive verb - to prevent from leaving or getting away; to keep under restraint; to have or maintain in the grasp Stawman is creating a false case and attacking with it. He said he grabbed her wrist (lightly, might I add) to keep her focus for long enough to give her a description of what happened No false case, not a strawman. Red herring is diverting attention by changing of a subject. Havne't changed the subject, not a red herring.
/r/MensRights24/07/12 01:54 AM
3

Because burning the roast is exactly the same as grabbing a person. ಠ_ಠ How do you even make that leap of logic? This is a point because it happened. It does not justify anything that happened to him, and nothing she did or the other guys did excuses him of grabbing her. You cannot justify any bad act based upon another bad act. From his own admission in the story his intent was to physically grab her and continue an argument she was extracting herself from. Objectively, without consideration of…
/r/MensRights24/07/12 01:37 AM
2

You need to read the next sentence too. I am in favor of if you see any possible violence happening in public you look into the matter objectively. I'm a rather large man, so I doubt seriously I would need to be rescued. In the case that that I am in an altercation, yes I would prefer people to ask questions about what is going on and after such taking the actions that should be taken.
/r/MensRights24/07/12 01:15 AM
0

Detain: transitive verb -to hold back; prevent from proceeding; delay The fact that you called it a hold kind of makes my case for me, regardless of it's ease to break.
/r/MensRights24/07/12 01:09 AM
-2

The only side I take is the side of sanity, logic and actual equal rights for both sides. It tends to put me both on the side of and at odds with both sides of a lot of the men/women arguments. Having had to deal with one sided victim laws though there is no other option I could take and still be morally ok with myself.
/r/MensRights24/07/12 12:45 AM
-1

Exactly, as can I. It was the wrong call for the OP to make though. While the resulting actions of others were not justified either that does not excuse it being the wrong thing to do for the OP's situation. Seemingly while trying to say that I supported people looking into such actions and making sure nothing serious was happening it made me an advocate of the violence that happened and continued violence. /shrug
/r/MensRights24/07/12 12:33 AM
-1

Yay someone who understands He also can't compare non-aggressively grabbing someone to ask them to do something while they are out to an aggressive action of grabbing hold of someone who is walking away from an argument in an effort to continue said argument.
/r/MensRights24/07/12 12:12 AM
-3

Please, quote specifically where I said that I think it's "better to attack someone." as you insist I did. I believe I said that they should check on situations. I went on further to say people should gather details as well. I believe that also invalidates your assumption that I am some sort of "hothead" on a crusade to sate violent urges. Lets look at a definition of detain shall we? to hold back; prevent from proceeding; delay You need to step out and get some perspective if you honestly can't…
/r/MensRights23/07/12 11:54 PM
-1

How does my comment signify he didn't dodge a bullet? or that he was better off not getting out? or anything even relating to that? Non sequitur
/r/MensRights23/07/12 11:31 PM
-7

Assumptions. He said lightly which is subjective at best. Quantify lightly by his standards for me. How hard he grabbed her is still not the point regardless of how harsh it was. His intent to continue an argument she was leaving by grabbing her is the problem. If he had something to say to her he is free to say so as she walks off, or when she comes back, or any number of other ways that does not result in him grabbing her in any fashion. Further detainment is detainment. You detain a child by …
/r/MensRights23/07/12 11:15 PM
1

My username is a jab at the concept of a Schrodinger's rapist entirely, it belies nothing more than that except perhaps my love of physics. She turned to leave the argument behind, and he forcibly detained her. What am I missing from his own statement of the story here? Regardless of how long they were together this is not "intimacy" as you put it. Her escalation yelling in a bar that he was hurting her might have been better done by a proceeding request of letting her go, but does not create an…
/r/MensRights23/07/12 10:55 PM
-2

You like to quote so why don't you quote the whole piece and get the next line too while you're at it. Especially since no where did I advocate the violence he suffered. The problem becomes they had a preconceived notion of what had happened and didn't, and acted on that instead of looking at the situation and gathering the details. Second, just because she is/was his girlfriend does not give him any special privilege to detain her by grabbing her. She is not a child, and he is not her lord and …
/r/MensRights23/07/12 10:32 PM
-7

Umm regardless of how hard you grabbed her, you did grab her. Proper response would have been to just go about your business, no need to get a last word in. As for white knights, they aren't really the problem. I would rather have people check in on things that might be going down like that than not. The problem becomes they had a preconceived notion of what had happened and didn't, and acted on that instead of looking at the situation and gathering the details. However, that still boils down to…
/r/MensRights23/07/12 09:44 PM
1

...but...but they're so cute when they try this hard :(
/r/MensRights23/07/12 01:15 PM
2

Don't thank me, and don't misunderstand logic, reason, and taking in the big picture for acceptance. After what happened to me with my ex and the one sided laws in place to help "victims", when all some of them really do is offer a way to punish men often without even having to file a criminal case that affords them due process, a jury trial, or even their own voice in the matter, I'm not exactly in a position where I would shed a tear over anything that happened to a feminist. I would denounce …
/r/MensRights20/07/12 01:36 PM
1

I do have some experience helping a professor start a new class I was interested in, and it was a real pain in the ass. Jumping through a number of hoops only to have the class denied several times, and even when it was finally given the go ahead pulled from the course catalog during add/drop period without explanation. ಠ_ಠ For something that would be controversial I have to imagine it would be much harder, and there would have to be an interest in it too. I can envision protests about it for su…
/r/MensRights20/07/12 01:19 PM
2

I have to ask...You're tenured, so why wouldn't you be outspoken about your views? You better than a lot of us might get heard and taken with some sense of seriousness. Add on to that you are in direct line of disputing some of the indoctrination and pseudo facts pushed on college kids. I have not been exposed to the Men's Rights Movement until the last couple years when I had a lot of the imbalance thrust into my face by a vindictive ex. I'm a student(understand that I'm 31, not starting until …
/r/MensRights20/07/12 01:56 AM
8

By your same logic, the MRM must give itself a bad name because of people like those associated with MHA. Which is it? Either the outlaying extremists, who might very well get the most notice and attention for being the loudest are the core principles of a group, or they aren't.
/r/MensRights20/07/12 01:05 AM
11

Banned no. Downvoted for comments like... Holy fuck, y'all actually believe that shit Absolutely
/r/MensRights20/07/12 12:22 AM
32

No, just no. What it was in the beginning, and what some of it's reasonable members want currently is ok. Fair treatment, equal rights, both of which are very good things to strive for. What some are trying to use it for, or pervert it into is an abhorrent, man hating propaganda machine, that pushes it's own agenda, and bullying new or changed laws into place that cause inequality.
/r/MensRights20/07/12 12:01 AM
25

everything that gives feminism a bad name, well MHA is that for mensrights
/r/MensRights19/07/12 10:31 PM
19

How do you figure they are still kept down? It sounds more like you are someone interested in keeping that kind of tripe ongoing. It's the same mindset as saying sexism can only be done against women by men. Because any "oppression" doesn't happen as far as I have seen in the college student world. If anything students are given more free money based on their tan and less on achievements or grades. They are given more leeway when they have done something wrong too, be it poor grades, academic mi…
/r/MensRights19/07/12 12:36 PM
1

Yeah, he sent me one too over a post last night. I laughed, reported him and went about my morning reddit reading :)
/r/MensRights17/07/12 02:02 PM
3

That guy's (I assume it's the same guy who posts then deletes his manhood crap) been trolling for a while ಠ_ಠ Best bet is to report and ignore it
/r/MensRights17/07/12 01:53 PM
1

Not to piss on the parade, specially because I think they're all very good points, but false accusations over all need to be dealt with. They're all incredibly one sided and require almost no proof beyond an accusation. False rape accusations might be the worst possible, but any false claim be it abuse, assault, or whatever are the main problem. What they are about is just varying the degrees of fucked up.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 01:50 PM
3

...and in breaking news a majority of deaths linked to breathing oxygen. Come on, seriously? Give us a link to a real study or just go back to whatever bridge you crawled out from under.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 12:05 AM
1

This bugs me for one very specific reason. Trying to quantify who has it better or worse and putting it into terms of favor of the group they are biased for, instead of trying to fix all of the problems. It's comparing apples to oranges most of the time anyway.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 02:55 PM
1

He didn't call you a liar, he said it smelled fishy. There is a distinct difference. I happen to agree with him. Why post this on r/MensRights and not relationshipadvice or askreddit? More to the point, this is a gender rights subreddit on a broad subject that involves equality, gender discrimination, mishandling of custody rights, and gender stereotypes to name a few things. We get trolling idiots in here too often asking some absurd things, or willfully changing their stories to try and get li…
/r/MensRights29/06/12 12:24 AM
5

I have questions about whether it would be prosecuted like rape here in the US. I think it would depend on the where, how, and intentions. You hit the nail on the head though, so to speak about having some object other than a penis wielded against someone doesn;t appear to be rape in this case. There was a story that made the news a few years back about a gang of young middle school or freshman high school girls attacking a male schoolmate off school ground, stripping him and sexually assaulting…
/r/MensRights27/06/12 03:30 PM
22

....I can't even wrap my head about stupidity of that magnitude ಠ_ಠ
/r/MensRights27/06/12 12:06 PM
10

It's like the boy who cried wolf, and eventually it could be a real wolf. As such every accusation should be looked into, but with a history of false accusations that should be taken into account for the sake of the accused. With that said this detective seems to fail on all counts of fairness and reason. Not turning over the information of a past history of false accusations, and not even investigating a second accusation. The judge as well seems to as well have taken a side in the ordeal. Sett…
/r/MensRights26/06/12 07:36 PM
4

It's sad, but it's not a new thought. It's not even solely owned by feminists, I've heard this same thing about racism. I would just be aware of what and how you and they say anything. I would at least suggest you take notes(date and time) on it after any altercation in case you need to defend your job someday. Starting with that sexism only applies to women remark. With that said though, just browse this subreddit and you will find plenty of article and study links to talk about with them, and …
/r/MensRights25/06/12 09:53 PM
3

It's an unfortunate story why it actually came to be, but I'm glad we have it now.
/r/MensRights25/06/12 09:45 PM
10

and that is usually followed by, or even proceeded by a ban from their cliquey little subreddit. The "We're always right because we don't tolerate opposing opinions!" idea.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 09:58 PM
5

At some point the only way to affect social change is revolution. Unfortunately there is indoctrination of young people to believe these are crimes that are worthy of rash decisions, ignoring of due process and the rights of the accused, and too often vigilante justice. There is also a built in cope out where if you push the accused to a point where they feel no choice but to end it, either through the taking of their own life or the life of the accuser, well then they must have done it all goes…
/r/MensRights18/06/12 02:42 PM
3

Doesn't even have to be limited to the military types. I know plenty of people who have or would be on either side of this cheating. Knowing them doesn't mean they're friends, everyone knows or works with people they don't like.
/r/MensRights18/06/12 02:50 AM
25

Sorry, not even remotely true ಠ_ಠ Most states have moved to no fault divorces(I don't actually know of one that doesn't). She could cheat on him with the whole neighborhood at once and broadcast it live to the world, hand him a video tape of it when he got back to make sure he knew, and it isn't grounds for anything in court.
/r/MensRights17/06/12 10:58 PM
3

Seems like someone who should find their car keyed often ಠ_ಠ
/r/MensRights17/06/12 10:56 PM
1

Well I don't know where you heard that, and if you have a link to a commercially available male birth control I'm sure everyone here would love to see it. There are male birth controls in the works(I believe one form is being tested currently in India), but all the ones I have seen are not equivalent to female birth control they require more than just some sort of hormonal treatment like the pill.
/r/MensRights13/06/12 05:32 PM
1

You called? More a problem with this train of thought to me is how much everyone is willing to play into the victimhood mentality with or without a valid pool of evidence. You could argue that there should be a push back with what you said, but two wrongs don't make right. A false accuser view would just hurt women reporting actual rapes and abuse as much as the handling and assumed guilt hurts men now. The mentality of the schrodingers rapist thought needs to be gotten rid of, as well as the sh…
/r/MensRights13/06/12 04:08 PM
1

Just to mention, you can talk with any female partner about what would happen if they get pregnant(lets assume you are sure it's yours as well). Anything you decide about abortion or giving up for adoption, even if you get it in writing, is still at the total whim of the she partner. If she decides to keep it even being that isnt what the pair of you decided you're SOL. She lies to you about birth control or forgets to take her pill same outcome. There is no coice truly for the male except not t…
/r/MensRights13/06/12 03:40 PM
1

Well if you're going to file I can tell you this, talk to a lawyer. The sooner the better. Also, unless the lawyer tells you to and if the house isn't a rental, plant your ass in it and don't move out of it. I have a friend who basically lost all claim to the house because he moved out. Edit: accidently words
/r/MensRights13/06/12 01:19 AM
1

Most states are hypothetically no fault, file but I wouldn't bother with the excuses just go straight to irreconcilable differences and save the reasons for what WILL turn out to be a custody battle, because any person like that will want the best way to keep getting money out of you.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 08:08 PM
1

If she is so resistant to facts and reasoned discourse from you then she may not respect you, your point of view, your methods of research. I really like the way you put that, and so ultimately true. I could date someone with a drastically different point of view, provided we respected one another's views on the matter and it didn't affect the relationship in negative ways. However, the "I heard it in class" is the part about the OP's story that bugs me as her falling back point. Especially sinc…
/r/MensRights11/06/12 03:29 AM
2

Not sure if you're being sarcastic or serious ಠ_ಠ Besides a woman can fuck up a life plenty other ways, or even with accusations of abuse/rape without ever formally accusing you of it in the legal system. I know that shit first hand. I don't think however that was a realistic concern for the OP, and while my opinion remains for him to run as far away from this girl as possible, it might be minor enough a disagreement and not a recurring theme that it can be water under the bridge.
/r/MensRights11/06/12 03:25 AM
42

I mean if you clearly tried to talk to her and represent valid facts you could back up, and all she could say was that in class she learned than the answer is probably no. A second part to that answer is also run away.
/r/MensRights10/06/12 08:58 PM
4

I'm confused why you're even worried about something so trivial being considered sexism or not. Since she is a friend do you think she is going to think that it is, or give you a hard time about it? Frankly I wouldn't want any of my male friends sleeping on my bed, as I know far too much about them. I do have a few female friends I would offer my bed to though, and think far less about it. That would probably fall under the ignorance is bliss clause for me honestly. It's the one place in my hous…
/r/MensRights09/06/12 04:46 AM
1

The difference is not all states do common law....and I thank god that WA didn't when I lived there
/r/MensRights01/06/12 04:01 AM
4

After spending my teenage years in FL I can't disagree.
/r/MensRights31/05/12 05:40 PM
9

I honestly like the idea(ideal) of marriage. It's the reality of it and the aggressive vindictive bullshit that too often goes along with a breakup/divorce I have seen, including my own parents divorce, that makes me leery of the entire thing. What's needed is common sense in the entire thing. Basic shit that I've heard of far too many times being done absolutely wrong. I mean I know of people paying percentages of their retirement ordered in divorce judgement a decade before they even retired p…
/r/MensRights31/05/12 05:39 PM
1

I commented on the amount of deleted comments in one of their threads. Instant ban lol
/r/MensRights09/05/12 05:03 PM
5

A result or prerequisite? I think it's time for a study to be done, FOR SCIENCE!
/r/MensRights06/04/12 03:23 PM
14

That is fucking beautiful..... I mean I went through the racist crap when I was younger. I actually had more than a few people tell me that it wasn't racism I got subjected to because I was white. Still I can't fathom the stupidity it requires to think these things. Any hate or bias towards any other person/group is what it is, period. They shouldn't be able to just attempt to explain it away with some bullshit logical fallacy.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 05:37 AM
1

I mean it could be anything from wanting a laugh at angering people to a blatant attempt to see if they could explain it well enough to get agreeing comments. Since I came here from the bot's repost and read it, I would lean towards the second option more than the first. Especially with that last sentence >.>
/r/MensRights05/04/12 11:00 PM
2

It highly depends on the local police and prosecutor's office, and a few other things like if she had access to the property because she was on the lease, given a key, so on and so forth. Frankly, if the locals decide not to pursue or investigate than a civil suit is the only option left which can be time consuming to present a case, costs money to file, and could very well end up not in their favor. I only speak from experience in this >.>
/r/MensRights05/04/12 03:06 AM
23

As a guy who tried to press charges on his thieving, life destroying ex....it's not as easy as it should be >.> and really depends solely on the local police and prosecutor. I was told I had to take her to civil court and that the police would not press charges, and the city prosecutor would not pursue any either. Just so you know that "pressing charges already" isn't always an option evidently.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 02:43 AM
1

It's the truth, they have an ethical code of conduct they are supposed to follow. The fact that some the in the profession choose to ignore, suppress, and generally have very low ethical standards in favor of getting a promotion, fame, or more money isn't really that funny. Those that do give everyone in the profession a bad name. On top of this they have an almost perfect alibi in claiming ignorance in anything but a glaring and gross violation of ethics. When the system finds another way to re…
/r/MensRights04/04/12 08:39 PM
8

Even if you can't un-file for alimony, there is nothing holding you back from willingly returning the money you do receive.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 08:17 AM
26

This place has been a much needed haven for me. I had to deal with an ex who with nothing but a made up story had me saddled with an apartment lease I could not singly afford, refused to move her stuff out(and I was not allowed to legally remove it from the property) so that I could get a room mate when she ceased paying her half of rent and utilities and had moved to another residence, stole thousands in property from me, and finally ended with a forced moved and the lose of a job. All of this …
/r/MensRights09/03/12 11:08 PM
1

Working under the assumption that the stuff is actually his... She's being a bitch trying to keep him from removing his property. With that said he's a complete fucking moron with the way he is acting, first using intimidating tactics towering over her in very close proximity and then lashing out physically at his surroundings. He should have called the cops as denial of property is theft under most law. If she had then escalated it to a physical confrontation he is easily twice her size and so …
/r/MensRights08/03/12 02:22 AM
1

This law student sounds vaguely like what happened to me minus one of the women that is.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 07:11 AM
34

Probably close to the same outrage reaction as one titled "How to get her pregnant and force her to have your baby" In society's eyes it is only ok when it's the man's reproductive rights being abused, and nothing in the reverse direction is acceptable in the slightest.
/r/MensRights19/02/12 04:32 AM
3

2/3rds Houses at the start and 3/4ths the states, I am well aware. I'm going to stick to my assumptions about the time all of that would take at a minimum in the event of an emergency, when time and lives matter. True, but would that be any better? Looting, soldiers against rioters, and if you think the right vs. left division in this country is bad now... In fact that would be worse. Which is the threat under which to ensure that it would never happen on a whim, and only for something seriously…
/r/MensRights08/02/12 06:35 AM
6

Which is only short your amendment qualifier by subtracting the president and adding a senate vote, and then a state vote. Which all take time to even setup, and may not even be possible in the event of an invasion or first strike scenario(especially if EMPs were used which is likely any advanced armies first action to knock out communication lines and cause disarray). I prefer having everyone sign up, it's the fair way of keeping a list of able bodied Americans. It would save time if shit ever …
/r/MensRights08/02/12 05:50 AM
0

I'm not going to argue with you about forcing someone to go to war, or explain to you what huddles are already in place before re-instituting a draft. Suffice to say though, since you believe America it is pretty ridiculous that we have a list of people the government can legally force to go to war on a whim you should go read up on what a draft actually is first. A whim hardly is sufficient grounds, and completely inaccurate.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 05:18 AM
11

In fact no one should oppose the draft. Oppose the politicians who institute it for "police actions" and not when a country is under a real threat. It is meant to be an "Oh shit we need manpower" option in times of crisis(Read: War, Invasion, Natural disasters on a scale we haven't ever seen, etc.) and not what it was used for in Vietnam and Korea. At the moment it would take quite a lot to even have the draft activated, but in the event of say a military attempt at invasion, why are only men's …
/r/MensRights08/02/12 04:39 AM
2

Came here to say I agreed with the second comment more than the picture >.> now I just want to buy you a beer for saying it all before me and knowing someone else felt the same way
/r/MensRights07/02/12 06:05 PM
-7

Wait the judge only ordered her to pay 1/3....is she somehow only 1/3rd the mother? Further more, how does a judge order you to pay for college anyway for kids that are of age? >.> I smell bullshit
/r/MensRights06/02/12 12:48 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter