TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Schroedinbug Archive

View 3 posts and 130 comments by Schroedinbug on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-5

Couldn't this also be updating to match color blind friendly color palettes? The colors shifting toward yellows and purples is suggests that to me. https://www.datylon.com/blog/data-visualization-for-colorblind-readers
/r/MensRights07/05/26 12:55 AM
1

Your observations seem flawed on both parts. You might try asking "if" before asking "why", ask reddit seems like a better place to do that.
/r/MensRights30/08/23 05:51 AM
1

Despite some posts that suggest the contrary, this sub is focused on discussions about men's rights, not necessarily anti-feminism. Some of us are feminists and MRAs, some are just MRAs, and some are open to civil discussions of men's rights. That last one is the only real requirement (rule 1).
/r/MensRights03/05/23 11:59 PM
7

I also got it to say that women commit suicide more than men by modifying the prompt and clicking regenerate a few times. https://imgur.com/a/rkMJFYp Like I said, don't trust chatGPT not to lie to you.
/r/MensRights04/03/23 08:06 PM
5

The disparity is also less pronounced in the actual CDC data. ChatGPT is no different than if a person were to make up data that looked convincing enough, while not being statistically accurate. There is currently no large language model that can be trusted on using accurate sources, whether that's open AI's GPT-3, Open AI's ChatGPT, or google's LaMDA There are papers that show promise, but the usable product is at least 5 years from being a reality. No matter the topic you're talking about, NO …
/r/MensRights04/03/23 07:47 PM
45

Stats are in the right direction but the wrong magnitudes (at least for any sources I could find). ChatGPT has no concept of the difference between making shit up and finding sources (this is true for all current LLMs). It will ingest your response and find the words most likely to occur after. it will continue doing this until null is most likely. ChatGPT is a tool, but you're going to need to replace or verify any data with a real source for it to mean anything. Using it in this way will do mo…
/r/MensRights04/03/23 07:05 PM
1

You are nearly right. The camera is not infrared but a night vision camera. It works by inverting color, so dark hair becomes light. Infrared cameras are more expensive and can't show anything but heat signature, no details. That's not how any of this works. Most night vision is just shining IR light onto the subject, it appears dark to people because it's just outside our visual range. Thermal cameras use blackbody radiation, which is a form of passive IR. What I think you're referring to by sa…
/r/PussyPassDenied13/02/23 01:58 AM
7

These forms will do nothing for you and even if you did it after, they could be signed under duress. Also, nobody is going to want to sign that as it's going to make you look very odd.
/r/MensRights27/12/22 05:54 PM
1

I'd guess harassment is your best bet. If you share a school that might actually be a good route for you.
/r/MensRights10/12/22 06:24 AM
5

I wouldn't be surprised if it were higher in number and lower in the percentage of their respective populations.
/r/MensRights05/12/22 02:15 AM
1

You would also need to take into account how many expectant mothers there are and compare it to how many soldiers there are, then compare THAT to the numbers murdered to get the actual risk to an average individual fitting those groups.
/r/MensRights05/12/22 02:14 AM
1

Well?
/r/MensRights17/11/22 01:56 PM
5

It could just be badly represented if less than 1 out of 20 journalists are women.
/r/MensRights03/11/22 02:31 AM
3

Can you give an example of which women's product you find comparable to the black gillette? Planning to do a comparison of the ingredients.
/r/MensRights14/10/22 10:33 PM
6

Same, love her former band storm seeker, and her music.
/r/MensRights13/10/22 11:53 AM
7

Patty Gurdy is a musician who was a part of a band called Storm Seeker before starting her own.
/r/MensRights13/10/22 11:52 AM
1

Absolutely. Is it more commonly looked down on than in the past? Sure, but it still happens to both men and women.
/r/MensRights15/09/22 01:36 AM
5

For the copyright side of things, you're probably screwed .as she owns the copyright to the work that she sold to you. One hail mary on the copyright discussion: If you took the photos that you sent to her and she recreated them as paintings without much modification on the originally work, you may be able to have the prints removed due to infringement of your copyrights. I'd suggest talking to a lawyer and looking for other avenues if you really want the works removed.
/r/MensRights12/09/22 12:14 AM
5

Unless the copyright was explicitly sold with the painting then OP does not own the copyright, whoever created the work or whoever they transferred the ownership of the copyright owns the copyright to the work. If she's selling prints of it then she likely still owns the copyright.
/r/MensRights12/09/22 12:08 AM
4

The claim never went beyond the perceived safety for one's self, and the data supports that women have a lower feeling of personal safety. The claim wasn't used here to support any other argument, if it were then maybe that argument would necessitate considering both perceived risks and the likelihood of risks. My comment was more to show that it is actually measurable despite one individual's personal experience.
/r/MensRights10/09/22 07:02 PM
7

Sure, and it can be dismissed with personal experience. ​ For their military standards argument, you can find the standards that men and women are held to online. They are unclassified, government regulations which generally means that they are released online. In this case they are. I'm going to stick to referencing Air Force standards as those are what I'm trained on. The regulation governing Air Force PT standards is DAFMAN 36-2905. As the DAFMAN is a little cumbersome, so here's a PT score c…
/r/MensRights10/09/22 06:47 PM
5

There are some things which are hard to measure. A common feminist example is "women feeling scared and anxious walking alone at night" It seems that 60% of women in the UK feel unsafe walking alone at night. This is a common claim made in good faith and it seems to be supported. Self-feelings of safety while walking alone at night.pdf) 2022, BBC survey in the UK, sample size 3361 adults (1637 male, 1724 female) ​ ​ A common misogynist example is "my wife made me buy all this furniture with my m…
/r/MensRights10/09/22 06:01 PM
1

Yep, old tab. Thanks for that!
/r/MensRights08/09/22 12:12 AM
1

​ At least one person who joined them accused the militia of being a bit of a grift, and “a lot to pay for just private chat membership.” (Raw Story) After January 6, both new recruits and disenchanted members who wished to quit struggled to reach anyone in charge, or get timely responses to their messages (The Daily Beast) One Oath Keeper, who is running for New Jersey state assembly, blamed the bureaucratic delays within the group on "the lefty attacks." (Raw Story) The Daily Dot reviewed the …
/r/MensRights07/09/22 11:50 PM
0

I made no statement on whether it was or was not racism. Only that it should not limit the quality of candidates based on the sheer mass of people if it's not too limiting. When it comes to hiring the one "best" candidate is probably getting the best job available to them, your company probably isn't that. Your hiring manager probably isn't even qualified or educated on the field they're hiring for to even know who the best candidate for the job is. This is especially true in technical fields wh…
/r/MensRights07/09/22 01:36 PM
-35

As long as a quota doesn't limit the possible candidates too severely, it should not be impossible to find an equally qualified candidate. If you get too specific (ie. prior military, Mediterranean, trans-women with a wife for head of telecommunications in New Zealand), then the pool narrows down to few or none. Saying that candidates must be 20% non-white might cut out 40% of available candidates (depending on field demographics), but won't really narrow down available candidates to the point w…
/r/MensRights07/09/22 02:45 AM
2

I wouldn't want to go back to that regardless of the surrounding circumstances. I just want to be able to live my life as a normal human. I don't want some benefit or additional responsibility just for having dangly bits in the right places. Let's face it, some men don't deserve that respect, why not just respect essential service workers where respect is deserved? In the harsh reality of how the world currently works being expendable means that your employers, politicians and whoever respects y…
/r/MensRights04/09/22 02:34 PM
5

It looks like your title is misrepresenting the paper. Considering that the conclusion of the paper states the exact opposite of the post title. This looks like it's in violation of rules 1, 2, and 14.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 09:46 PM
4

I'd argue that women carry more responsibility typically with regards to birth control, which means that more trust is needed from men that they are using it properly or at all. More options for male-specific birth control would benefit both parties (women bear less responsibility in that area and men have more options that require less trust).
/r/MensRights01/09/22 02:08 AM
2

I'm confused, isn't this exactly what we're doing? It's not a zero-sum game, if you mandate 100% of employees to go to training, the 50% of that training being given to women doesn't mean that fewer men got it.
/r/MensRights16/08/22 02:46 AM
1

A lot of construction in union.
/r/MensRights20/07/22 12:08 AM
16

As someone who worked construction and then later was a contractor, I'd argue that if being stronger on average was that much of a benefit, then your back is gonna get fucked. Use your equipment or another person to help lift so that we don't have to see so many 30 yr olds collecting disability for fucking themselves over. I got out young to go to STEM because it paid better and due to the amount of BS shortcuts that people are willing to take when lives are at risk.
/r/MensRights20/07/22 12:07 AM
17

That just sounds like both common sense and fucking decency. It's work, not a bar. Also never touch someone without clearing it with them, because I swear to god if I get another hand on my shoulder to get my attention, I'm gonna lose my shit lol
/r/MensRights19/07/22 12:31 AM
2

The women weren't disagreeing either. The only ones who seemed to be disagreeing were him and his girlfriend. He made up his mind before posting that and no amount of warning from internet strangers is going to get him to leave.
/r/MensRights14/07/22 02:23 AM
81

That recently happened to a woman as well. The "needs of the child" doctrine is very damaging to anyone caught in the crossfire. Note: The father, in this case, has not been convicted of rape here, but due to the age difference when the child was conceived, and the fact that the man is confirmed the biological father, it can safely be assumed to be statutory rape even if the mother consented.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 12:20 AM
4

From what I've seen over there most of them are for roe v wade but many want to include other things if it gets re-instated.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/22 12:46 PM
5

I agree that most women aren't cruel, but just like the small subset of 4chan incels that make up men, those who are like this (men or women) stick out to the people they interact with. You probably don't notice the 5 people who ignore you on the subway as much as the person on meth getting aggressive with you.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 04:33 PM
6

Yep, was driving and a slightly drunk girl (who I barely knew, in a car with other friends) reached crossed and tried to get her hand in my pants. There have been other less serious incidents (verbal harassment).
/r/MensRights20/05/22 05:22 PM
6

Not really a breakup, just moving away and peacefully parting ways I lost a hoodie or two.
/r/MensRights14/05/22 03:59 PM
1

I'm not arguing for or against either here, I'm merely saying that despite u/tired_hillbilly being both, he's the minority of pro-life supporters.
/r/MensRights12/05/22 03:21 AM
2

It's currently around 65% (as of 2020\1])), with around half\2]) of that 65% number actually going to a church if previous trends continue. Church/synagogue/mosque membership in the U.S. dropped below 50% for the first time in 2020 (47%) and is declining fast\3]). It should be noted that some parts of the U.S. are around 80% Christian, while others are around 30% Christian, so it depends on your state and county/perish. The 80-90% number is either referring to a base of those who are religious c…
/r/MensRights11/05/22 03:41 PM
1

Yeah, but if the pro-life movement relied on just non-theist, it would be over by the end of the week. If all atheists and non-theist disappeared from the movement tomorrow, the pro-life movement would continue just fine.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 04:55 AM
0

It's a joke, not a dick, you know the rest. The only reason you use a torch (likely MAPP or propane) is if you know that heating a fastener to expand it gonna cost a lot less than breaking it off.
/r/MensRights01/05/22 06:08 PM
5

Breaker bar like the rest of us. When that fails, get out the oxy/acetylene because it can't be tight if it's liquid. Leverage is worth a lot of strength. Unless your wrist can put out 450 ft-pounds (your forearm probably can't survive 150ft/lbs of inline torque) I doubt you'll be using a socket on a screwdriver for a big nut.
/r/MensRights01/05/22 04:33 AM
28

In some cases, rape is either defined by penetrating with a penis or entering past a vulva(in cases where sodomy or sexual assault are the alternative(s)), which can also lead to men not being legally able to be raped unless underage.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 02:00 AM
0

Part of the reasons we have lower fitness standards for women in jobs that aren't likely to see combat is that the goal of such standards is less for performance and more for overall health (government doesn't like forking out money). A woman who can do 50 pushups in a minute is on average more healthy than a man who can do the same. Arguments could be made that the standards still are too low, but then that comes back to yearly(and sometimes bi-yearly) fitness test being used as a force shaping…
/r/MensRights12/04/22 01:07 AM
1

Am military. It generally comes back to tradition and older leadership. We shaved heads to prevent lice in the trenches, and got rid of beards for gas masks. It's no longer the case that beards degrade gas mask seals, or that lice in trenches is a problem. As for why women get to keep theirs: They weren't generally in trenches, so the reg didn't include them originally, and now it's an issue with recruiting women that we make their standards freer. If we desire to hit a higher percentage of wome…
/r/MensRights12/04/22 01:03 AM
51

To a good portion of people, you're creepy. You probably don't notice people who don't find you creepy, but the ones who do will stand out. If you walk by 100 people in a day, at least a handful will think you're creepy, even if most people don't. Let's say you're not considered creepy by someone, random people who don't know you will need to be cold or risk that you are either creepy or dangerous because there are no real universal indicators that everyone can use. It's sad, but you'll probably…
/r/MensRights04/04/22 12:47 AM
0

I'm more impressed that Finland managed to make a third of their military not support roles, and that even a percent of it considered "frontline". Any source for what is being considered ops combat and support roles and which gender fills what?
/r/MensRights24/02/22 01:19 PM
10

I think he's talking about male-only conscription, not voluntary military service.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/02/22 01:38 PM
24

Don't forget that men cannot legally be raped in many countries.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/02/22 01:28 PM
2

Also some people like the dark circles. Generally, whatever you look like, there are people who probably think you look great.
/r/MensRights07/02/22 12:09 PM
4

Most contracts have clauses that aren't legally enforceable, nobody goes to jail for violating a civil contract, and signing away his parental rights could be used against him by influencing the judge's decision if this ever went to court. Him not paying child support is a case of something not being legally enforceable. Best interest of the child is the goal when it comes to custody and child support and the child has a right to financial support so that part is essentially ignored. She wouldn'…
/r/MensRights04/02/22 12:30 PM
5

It's almost like both partners will have their own reasons to end a relationship regardless of their gender. /s Both people are probably going to be unhappy with how things were going.
/r/MensRights31/12/21 02:21 PM
5

!remindme 360 days
/r/MensRights22/11/21 01:41 PM
6

The question they are answering premiums with this isn't as much "How likely are you to get into an accident per mile." but rather "How much are we going to pay?" More miles and more deadly accidents mean higher premiums.
/r/MensRights29/10/21 11:07 PM
3

If this ever happens again file a police report. It might be uncomfortable, and there WILL be someone who says it's either not worth their time or that you should just accept it "like a man", but it would at least teach someone about what constitutes assault.
/r/MensRights28/09/21 10:49 PM
8

According to the laws in the UK (Sexual Offences Act 2003), biological women cannot rape due to the definition requiring: "A person (A) commits an offence if— (a)he intentionally penetrates the vagina, anus or mouth of another person(B) with his penis, (b)B does not consent to the penetration, and (c)A does not reasonably believe that B consents." This shit was written in 2003.
/r/MensRights25/09/21 11:32 PM
10

Honestly, there's no reason that you can't be both. There are issues on both sides worth advocating for.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 12:41 PM
56

Well she's still alive, but in prison awaiting a death sentence. Someone above posted the info on it, but she basically bashed another girl's face in with a rock and then brought pieces of her skull to school to brag about it because she thought she was "trying to steal" her high school boyfriend.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/06/21 12:01 AM
3

If you're not using tinder, I'd say you can probably forget about the pickup lines. In-person they might be a good crutch, but often they come across as too "pickup artist-like" In some circles women making the first move isn't even seen as that unusual, that's not the case in most places though. In almost all dating apps it's a shitty rat race and almost a numbers game where you send 100 messages to get a reply and get about many replies to even meet in person. That obviously makes it really ea…
/r/MensRights24/03/21 11:51 PM
2

I'd say it's perfectly valid. The people saying that women should dress modestly because "men can't control themselves" are simply wrong and shoving their (usually religious) views down our throats. The way to fix this is simply to agree that both men and women can control themselves, and how someone else is dressed isn't really the issue. Sure when people believe that they are somehow helpless to this, and the culture/laws in that area will lead to little consequences you're going to have more …
/r/PussyPass23/03/21 11:00 PM
2

There's a reason the link you gave was only able to find one case of that law being used to prosecute someone, the use of the word "induces" carries a specific legal definition, and if you look at the one case that someone has been prosecuted with this law you can get a pretty good hint as to what that is. Generally, it is actively persuading someone(what do they get out of it, and who is it coming from), like in this case's example paying someone under 18 to perform or participate in a sexual a…
/r/PussyPass16/03/21 10:20 PM
8

It depends on the state (and country), in this case, no laws were broken. " Romeo and Juliet" laws exist for a good reason. They usually specify 3-4 years, this isn't anything that unusual. Is it shitty? Maybe, when I was 20, I wouldn't want anything to do with someone that young, but I'm not going to force my preferences in this area. Something could be said for the power dynamic due to her fame, which to me would be weird on either side, but again I'm not pushing my opinions on someone when it…
/r/PussyPass16/03/21 02:07 AM
6

OP, if you're getting beat to shit on THIS sub on THIS issue, you might want to at least consider rethinking your position. Replies that say "wish those teachers were around when I was in school" are downvoted to oblivion, and for good reason. It's not like this sub is pro age and power dynamics when it's the man/boy(or woman/girl) who might be taken advantage of. A 3 year age gap isn't huge, at this time in their life I would consider it a big issue for me personally, but legally the is nothing…
/r/PussyPass16/03/21 02:02 AM
6

I mean 20 and 17 isn't a huge difference. It seems shitty due to the power dynamic, but not exactly criminal as it is in the cases of teachers and such.
/r/PussyPass16/03/21 01:56 AM
1

I'm not as concerned with what they call the issues, as long as the issues are recognized. After issues are recognized, steps can be taken to resolve the issues.
/r/MensRights13/03/21 01:20 AM
0

I would say that many societies will downplay physical attraction for both women and men, as sex is in general viewed in a negative light. Both men and women are often given a false dichotomy of having either a "pretty face" or a "good partner". I've personally heard it said for both sexes in religious environments. It's usually not said that you should date an ugly person, but rather more nuanced with the false assumption that a person can't(or won't) be both attractive and a desirable partner …
/r/PussyPass14/02/21 09:48 AM
1

Fair enough, I guess I wrongly assumed what you were talking about with the definition of the issue. I assumed the issue was that men were at an unfair disadvantage, rather than the entitlement was being presented. I don't think we really disagree here.
/r/PussyPass14/02/21 05:23 AM
0

Yeah, I agree that FDS is generally pretty extreme, the person in this video may hold disagreeable ideas, but with what was explicitly stated, IDK why it's disagreeable or on this sub in general.
/r/PussyPass14/02/21 02:25 AM
1

If I don't meet all or any of those standards, then how does that affect me? If they also don't meet my standards for a partner, then I'm not interested and need to move on. That leaves me right back where I was, finding someone who meets my standards while I'm also meeting their standards. I guess we either need to come up with a solution to these problems or continue doing the same things you just listed, by setting standards and not settling for less than those standards. I believe that we're…
/r/PussyPass14/02/21 01:44 AM
1

Let's say all of that is true, wouldn't it be just as reasonable to assume that someone with unreasonably high standards is going to have an issue finding partners? Sure maybe they'll find someone with lower standards, but at what point does it become something I can change or fix? I don't have some right to be with someone because that's what I believe I deserve. They also need to accept or believe that I am what they want for anything to work out. If we're comparing dating to a market, then it…
/r/PussyPass14/02/21 01:34 AM
1

What's your solution? I'm familiar with the data put out by OKcupid that all of those links are based on, and have no issue saying that it may be true, despite some issues with methodology. We're still back to "How do we fix this?". Not to mention how any group of people can have the same trait at 100%. My personal belief is that everyone should do what is best for them, providing it's not an unreasonable expense to others. Without removing free will on anyone's part, the only solution I see (wi…
/r/PussyPass14/02/21 01:14 AM
147

I mean, what is there to disagree with? Sure the sub is basically incels, but based only on what was said here I don't see an issue. IDK about you but I'm not going to be going for someone that I don't find attractive, and don't see how this is any different.
/r/PussyPass13/02/21 08:54 PM
-8

Where the hell you getting that from? It should be simple to prove or debunk, just by looking at how favourably each side views feminism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/01/21 08:31 PM
4

I would say that this is a borderline incel. Sure, some might be predatory(if they're like prosperity gospel preachers), but in general, the people watching these are choosing to consume that content.
/r/MensRights18/12/20 06:02 AM
0

Yeah, it's shitty as fuck to say you'll help with something (implying for free) and then turning around and thinking you deserve sex. When I do work on someone's car, payment is agreed on upfront. If it's a friend it's usually beer, or if they can do something for me like weld better than me, or let me borrow a tool that'll be mentioned. I'm not posing as someone willing to "just help out", or as a "nice guy" and then asking for payment after the work is done when they didn't agree to that. If e…
/r/PussyPassDenied12/12/20 08:40 PM
10

I'm of the opinion that she is entitled for expecting free work, and the dudes doing "free work" and then asking for sex are also I've helped more people work on their car for the price of beer than I can count. If someone is going to be entitled to it, I'm going to give you a recommendation to a mechanic at best. Just because something would be easy for me to do, and would cost you a good bit of money to have done, doesn't mean I should help. If thirsty mofos out there are doing free mechanic w…
/r/PussyPassDenied12/12/20 08:32 PM
19

But didn't you know, 1 in 4 homeless people are women!
/r/MensRights08/12/20 07:19 PM
3

For non-combat positions, I understand that there are lower fitness standards. The goal for it here is to make sure the DoD isn't paying for your health problems later down the road. A female doing 60 pushups is going to be on average healthier than a male doing the same. I think the standards are too far apart based on the failure rates. You can't say that a man on a walk test after a broken leg has a lower minimum time than the woman running her test and call that fair or effective. Now when t…
/r/MensRights07/12/20 05:50 PM
22

This fucking bullshit is everywhere. The Air Force for example didn't allow males to wear earrings OUT OF UNIFORM until very recently. You need to conform to masculine/feminine standards set by society like a good little boy/girl.
/r/MensRights07/12/20 04:25 PM
5

This is a little off from what the study is saying if I've read it right. I'm not sure if you are saying that female politicians are more polarized than male politicians, but if so the study seems to say that women are more polarized on political issues (abortion for example). The focus isn't on politicians, but on everyday people, though some studies on gender in politicians are referenced.
/r/MensRights02/12/20 07:09 PM
16

Probably realized that calming her down wasn't gonna happen.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/11/20 06:39 PM
1

Maybe she was playing it up for the camera? As if this was gonna be yet another Instagram post.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/11/20 07:56 PM
15

Taser, no doubt at all. A stun-gun hurts and would be useful for controlling someone (like getting them in handcuffs). Among the fuckery that happened with the stun gun, one guy had to crawl away while someone held the stun gun of a taser to him. A taser makes moving all but impossible if it hits right and has a good spread and really hurts. I have burn scars from the taser, and couldn't move with a 10-second shoulder to boot spread. With a shoulder to waist spread, you can still kinda walk, but…
/r/PussyPassDenied27/10/20 12:46 AM
60

It's so much worse with sound. If you're going to use a stun-gun, at least learn how to use it. Don't activate it and use it as a flashlight for several seconds before you actually try to use it. It's not all that effective to start with, depleting the batteries, or overheating won't help. -Someone who has been hit with a stun-gun and Taser, and been to training on both. Also "he put his hands on a woman" isn't really a good defence when she came after him with a stun-gun, while he was trying to…
/r/PussyPassDenied27/10/20 12:13 AM
104

I get why she was yelling, sure seeing a student being choked might be scary, but not why the fuck she didn't stop it until he fought back.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/10/20 07:13 AM
2

I don't disagree.
/r/PussyPass25/10/20 01:44 AM
3

If your reaction is different when genders are swapped (whether you're a feminist, MRA, or both), you need to reevaluate whether you have a bias.
/r/PussyPass25/10/20 01:25 AM
2

He said that if she were a dude and inferred that she'd be on her ass.
/r/PussyPass10/10/20 09:03 PM
4

Pretty sure she would have felt safe attacking a tank or stopping a train at that point.
/r/PussyPass10/10/20 09:00 PM
2

You're not credible because you should have manned up and fought her off. You aren't gay right? /s
/r/MensRights10/10/20 03:40 AM
5

"Considering the ages and the genders" Well this says a lot.
/r/MensRights09/09/20 11:45 PM
2

Hypergamy is bad, m'kay? Are you saying that forced or voluntary hypergamy is bad?
/r/MensRights29/08/20 02:26 AM
5

Almost certainly at a higher rate. It's a false dichotomy to think that we can only work of one of these issues at a time. People being forced into marriage is an issue, it's just less common that we hear about men being forced into marriage, seemingly for different reasons and with different methods. Both are issues that need to be solved, this is a Men's Rights subreddit, so naturally, the discussion tends to be about men's rights.
/r/MensRights26/08/20 07:09 PM
2

It depends when renting out a property you can often keep the cost of repairs down by having a few people willing to work for you on multiple jobs. You can usually find people willing to work for pretty cheap as long as you have multiple jobs (stability), they work for you as the landlord by the hour rather than by the job, meaning if things go well, it's cheaper and if a job takes a lot more time it's more expensive. If you're good at managing this and a little lucky, you're able to keep the re…
/r/PussyPassDenied04/07/20 05:41 AM
5

The topic of racism is important and certainly viewed in a better light than the topic of sexism against men. I don't see any issues with covering both issues, it may bring these issues to people who would otherwise find the idea less palatable.
/r/MensRights24/06/20 01:48 AM
34

I'd guess that she probably didn't expect him to retaliate, and has never taken a punch before.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/05/20 05:41 PM
11

The actual values of this are unknown and the ones given in this post are terribly off. You don't get to just take the first number you find on google, remove a euro sign and call it USD.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/04/20 09:18 PM
1

Does anyone have the sauce?
/r/PussyPassDenied02/11/19 07:36 AM
3

Likely a period early during pregnancy where the man is required to be notified and required to make a decision.
/r/MensRights11/10/19 05:07 PM
5

If I had to choose between all taxpayers and thousands of individuals I would certainly choose the taxpayer here. It will likely have a small effect on taxes (especially when compared to many other government programs), however, it ruins a lot of lives.
/r/MensRights11/10/19 04:53 PM
2

I'd add a /s to your post.
/r/MensRights11/09/19 02:04 PM
4

I was just as surprised as when I found out! Yes, continuous as long as you are on this earth ;) . Prostate growth is due to a different mechanism, and not an absolute certainty. It is far more likely that yours will grow should you live long enough to have 'pleasure' of a prostate that restricts urethral functions. I'd personally like to see more funding go into solving prostate related issues, because they will only become more prevalent as our life spans increase. Here are a couple links on o…
/r/MensRights11/09/19 03:33 AM
10

Not entirely true. As far as we can tell there is a correlation between increased ejaculation and reduced risk of prostate cancer. Right now it is really just a correlation that is thought to be caused by flushing out older sperm cells as well as other components in cum before mutations can occur (as far as I understand it). I've yet to see any reasonable studies that suggest an increase in prostate growth or cancer due to increased ejaculation. If you can find one feel free to link to it! I can…
/r/MensRights11/09/19 12:04 AM
3

Hard wood for hardwood?
/r/PussyPassDenied01/09/19 06:47 PM
5

I'd suggest setting standards, if women can pass those standards then they're fit for combat, if not they can join men who also can't meet those same standards. In non-combat roles fitness standards are often set not so the individuals can physically do those things (though those are the requirements how it is assessed), but so that they are at a certain level of health. A woman who can do 30 push-ups is likely more healthy than a man who can only do 30 push-ups. In these cases it would make sen…
/r/MensRights06/08/19 06:57 PM
1

Happens to us all hahaha
/r/MensRights30/07/19 11:25 PM
1

I'm talking about women who intentionally lie. There are cases in the past where they have admitted to lying.
/r/MensRights29/07/19 12:50 AM
2

One thing I'd like to add is that they should certainly be tried for lying in court, obstructing justice and any other things that come out of a false allegation, but worry about how a law for false rape allegations would have an effect on innocent people.
/r/MensRights26/07/19 11:08 PM
3

Because in this case, I don't want to be the guy on the other end. I don't know the answer, and I'd certainly like retribution with very strong consequences. I just don't want people to get stuck with these because the other person has lost the nerve, but is still afraid of going to jail. The far better way to move forward IMHO would be to have a reasonable burden of proof so that people aren't being prosecuted without real evidence.
/r/MensRights26/07/19 11:01 PM
1

I agree, but in the case of false allegations of any crime, I worry that if the people willing to make that allegation, they aren't as deterred by the punishment going in as they would be with backing out.
/r/MensRights26/07/19 10:50 PM
-14

I think this is a conversation worth having. I'm afraid that if we threaten women who lie about rape with jail time, it would make those who are willing to lie about it, less likely to recant for fear of being caught. We'd have to decide which poses the greater risk.
/r/MensRights26/07/19 10:27 PM
21

He's in New York, Selfie cam is mirrored.
/r/MensRights25/07/19 11:26 PM
1

The dude getting assaulted denied it, other people rushed in.
/r/PussyPass23/07/19 01:52 PM
1

One guy is seeing other people as well, so it isn't exactly cookie cutter polyandry.
/r/PussyPass23/07/19 01:47 PM
1

What's the problem here? Non-monogamy isn't really bad as long as all partners consent.
/r/PussyPass23/07/19 01:45 PM
1

Seems to be only related to intent though.
/r/MensRights02/07/19 12:12 AM
0

Alimony should really be limited to a short length of time and awarded more scarsely.
/r/MensRights14/06/19 07:57 PM
12

I'd certainly hope he wasn't giving a child rapist a second chance, especially considering the possible implications of her being a special ed teacher.
/r/MensRights27/05/19 05:36 PM
8

You're point? If you do something to piss me off, does that mean I can walk up and sucker punch you, give you a good slap or kick you in the balls? All three of those are assault, and aren't justified just because you hurt my feelings.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 01:52 PM
9

This is honestly my new favorite version of this song!
/r/MensRights23/05/19 03:04 AM
1

While it's true that some or many women do this, it's also true that some or many men do this. It's common for male domestic abusers to do the same. If you bring this crap to an argument it'll be just as easy to pull some statistics about reported male domestic abusers and generalize all men.
/r/MensRights12/05/19 11:27 PM
1

I'd argue that every form of human interaction is some sort of manipulation. This is certainly an extreme example of manipulation, but I wouldn't generalize all women because of these occurrences as there are examples on both sides of the gender spectrum. Your comment really isn't productive to aiding men's rights.
/r/MensRights12/05/19 07:47 PM
3

This is the problem I have with a lot of more popular feminist. They seem to see men's and women's rights as mutually exclusive, in that you can only advocate for one or the other. This leads to people thinking that if you advocate for men's rights, you MUST then hate women and be some sort of incel. In reality many, if not most MRAs just want equal human rights for both genders and to get rid of the perception that one is somehow better than the other. The moment you see one gender as superior …
/r/MensRights12/05/19 05:31 PM
2

Not sure how anyone would take the ex-GF's side on this, but some people seem to have no problem with this :|
/r/MensRights11/05/19 04:47 PM
1

This is certainly just trash and doesn't need to be here. Sexist talk like this is what incel pages are for. This basically says that women should assume rich guys are rapist who either can't or shouldn't have to control themselves. Then also victim blames, this is both a men's rights issue as well as a human's rights issue.
/r/MensRights29/04/19 03:10 AM
51

r/MorbidReality
/r/MensRights06/04/19 05:15 AM
1

To be fair, almost all positions of power you'll get "don't rape" training. Both men and women, even if they assume the class is meant for men. ​
/r/MensRights24/03/19 09:31 PM
1

Honestly that is a good goal. Not by raising suicide rate of women, but fixing issues leading to men's being so high.
/r/MensRights18/03/19 02:41 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter