TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ScienceAteMyKid Archive

View 4 posts and 164 comments by ScienceAteMyKid on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-18

Stand your ground laws… what could go wrong?
/r/MensRights02/07/26 07:19 PM
4

My thought is that you’ve made a sweeping generalization that has no basis in fact other than your own anecdotal experience.
/r/MensRights23/06/26 11:48 PM
4

“Ruth suffered a mental health crisis, he became her named carer.” She was in a situation in which her mental health status required a legally appointed caregiver. Then her husband - while in that role of caregiver - pressured her into a risky activity she’d spent 12 years declining to participate in. He took advantage of a lopsided power dynamic while she was suffering from mental health problems. That’s some fucked up abuse. If you can’t see the problem with that, you need to do some real soul…
/r/MensRights17/06/26 07:43 AM
2

Replace the word “women” with “people.”
/r/MensRights14/04/26 02:44 AM
2

Welp, then I guess it’s pointless to try.
/r/MensRights14/04/26 02:42 AM
21

Unions help us support our families. Billionaires hoard wealth, making home ownership impossible and driving inflation. War hawks send our sons to die in foreign wars, motivated by their own oil profits. The current administration is bending backwards to protect Trump and other child rapists. You know what to do.
/r/MensRights06/04/26 06:04 AM
3

Instead of being pissed at women who have a generalized fear of men, get pissed at the men who are poisoning the well by behaving in a way that makes women fear them.
/r/MensRights15/02/26 12:20 AM
4

Yes, all the time. But honestly, I’ve had that same experience far more often with dudes. The inability to shut the fuck up is a universal human trait.
/r/MensRights14/01/26 09:19 AM
1

But it’s so unspecific to men, it seems to be more of a gender-neutral issue.
/r/MensRights07/11/25 02:53 AM
-2

Not much to do with men’s rights. Maybe try seeking out a family lawyer.
/r/MensRights03/11/25 07:13 AM
1

Is 95% an actual statistic? Or is that just a number you made up because these are the cases you’ve been exposed to? I don’t know what the actual numbers are, but I would imagine that the cases you’re talking about are more likely to be reported in the media because they are far more sensationalist and will generate a lot more clicks.
/r/MensRights16/10/25 01:19 AM
-26

She’s not saying he’s short. She’s saying he has the energy of a short man who’s angry about it and lashing out. You know that guy, right? No one gives a shit about it except for him. It’s called a bantam complex.
/r/MensRights07/10/25 05:36 AM
1

To be fair, anyone eligible to vote makes their choice, and the result of any election is on their shoulders.
/r/MensRights06/10/25 01:46 AM
1

“No one wants a movie with a male Cinderella.” “There was a movie made about a male Cinderella.” “Yeah, but…”
/r/MensRights20/08/25 04:02 AM
6

By that token, they’re gonna have to figure out how to deal with the fact that JB died in the last movie. That’s a more significant hurdle than continuity with the backstory from 1969.
/r/MensRights19/08/25 05:20 AM
-15

That’s the silliest take I’ve ever heard. You really think the big grand conspiracy is that women don’t want men to enjoy fictional characters?
/r/MensRights19/08/25 05:17 AM
2

Not that it matters, but it was the #1 film in the US the week it was released, and grossed appx. $4.7M, landing it in the top 20 films of the year. It was also remade as a Broadway play.
/r/MensRights19/08/25 05:12 AM
0

There is literally a movie called Cinderfella. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cinderfella
/r/MensRights19/08/25 04:29 AM
-14

Sure, James Bond could be a woman. James Bond could be a woman, or a man, or a trans person. James Bond could be a goddamn squirrel or a beluga whale. James Bond could be anything. Have we lost sight of the fact that this is a FICTIONAL character? Who gives a flying fuck if James Bond is a woman? It literally could not matter less. Christ, there’s an animated version of Romeo and Juliet in which they are characterized as garden gnomes and no one blew a gasket about that abomination. So sure, if …
/r/MensRights19/08/25 04:27 AM
2

The irony is that Republicans are demonstrably worse than Democrats for both the economy and international relations.
/r/MensRights19/08/25 03:30 AM
-6

This has fuck all to do with MR. Some people move on quickly, others less so. Regardless, anyone in that situation has the responsibility of considering how the level of their next commitment influences their existing family.
/r/MensRights22/06/25 03:08 AM
1

She was a successful lawyer before Obama was in the senate, so she’d be just fine.
/r/MensRights21/06/25 05:13 PM
2

Counterpoint: I was diagnosed and started on Adderall at 40. If I’d been diagnosed and medicated when I was a child, I would have been more focused, more successful, and more motivated. If I’d had the benefits of ADHD meds from an early age, I’d have gotten better grades, I’d have gone to med school instead of getting a crappy job as a bench scientist, I’d have made better investments, and made better decisions regarding romantic partners. I’d be happier, better off financially, more secure in m…
/r/MensRights05/06/25 04:08 AM
1

From the L.A. Times: “Left out of the narrative is Vena's alleged history of abuse toward Carbone, which she said began before any issues of gender arose with their child and is detailed in court documents reviewed by The Times. Also left out are Vena's outbursts in court, which a judge and his own former attorney warned would hurt his efforts to be reunified with the child. Left out are all the careful attempts by two judges, the child's independent counsel and trained medical professionals to …
/r/MensRights02/06/25 02:13 AM
4

From the L.A. Times: “Left out of the narrative is Vena's alleged history of abuse toward Carbone, which she said began before any issues of gender arose with their child and is detailed in court documents reviewed by The Times. Also left out are Vena's outbursts in court, which a judge and his own former attorney warned would hurt his efforts to be reunified with the child. Left out are all the careful attempts by two judges, the child's independent counsel and trained medical professionals to …
/r/MensRights02/06/25 02:12 AM
-39

There are surely other reasons. He could be abusive, he could have a history of severe addiction, he could be on parole, he could have made viable threats, he could have psychiatric problems… No one’s going to have a restraining order simply because he doesn’t agree to the idea that a toddler is trans. Edit: the downvotes look like a collective tantrum from which all I hear is, “No, it’s the trannies! It’s the ONLY possibility!” Seriously, no one, even here in socialist-commie-feminist-man-hatin…
/r/MensRights01/06/25 06:06 PM
-3

Best of luck to OP.
/r/MensRights27/05/25 06:57 PM
-6

I think you missed my point.
/r/MensRights27/05/25 06:54 PM
-8

You’re confusing correlation w causation. An ultra-religious wife will never divorce you, because she’s been taught that divorce is unacceptable. She will stay with you even if she hates you or is too scared of you to leave. Sounds like a blast.
/r/MensRights27/05/25 06:50 PM
1

If that’s a problem for you, that’s your prerogative. I’d never want to go long-term with a woman who hasn’t been around the block a few times. She knows what she wants, she’s had time to get comfortable with her sexuality, she’s not going to wonder if she missed out or if she could have done better.
/r/MensRights27/05/25 06:44 PM
9

While some people think DEI means “hiring a less qualified person because they are non-white or female,” I’ve more often found that it means “hiring the more qualified person instead of the less qualified white male.” Let the downvotes come as they may, but this has been my overwhelming experience in 28 years of facility management.
/r/MensRights24/02/25 09:08 AM
1

Correct. I didn't say, "This person is 100% correct in every single thing that she said." What I said was, "She has a point." This should not be controversial.
/r/MensRights18/02/25 09:03 AM
-12

Thanks for telling me what I was trying to say.
/r/MensRights18/02/25 03:09 AM
-21

Sounds like you’re agreeing with my point: Article: “Men in men-only spaces don’t show a ton of compassion for the plights that some women face.” OP: “We don’t show compassion for women’s issues??? Am I taking crazy pills?” Me: “The article is sorta right. We don’t go out of our way to sympathize with issues that specifically women face.” You: “Hey! This is a men’s space! We’re not here to show compassion for women.”
/r/MensRights18/02/25 02:45 AM
-16

It’s a fair point. I mean, how often do I ever see a post on this sub that shows genuine concern and compassion for what women go through? Pretty much never. (OK, I change it from “pretty much never” to “almost never,” or “Infrequently enough that I’d have to dig for it.”)
/r/MensRights18/02/25 12:45 AM
-13

What’s the point of posting this? This has nothing to do with men’s rights, it’s just an opportunity to say, “Hey, women suck.” “Oh, but if a MAN did it…” is just a straw man. This is useless on this sub, unless the point of men’s rights is to just like women less.
/r/MensRights13/02/25 01:10 AM
2

That's not empathy, that's people not wanting to get sued for interfering.
/r/MensRights03/12/24 11:41 PM
-9

So what I’m getting is that dudes had their feelings hurt by mean people, so they voted for the guy who will make everyone’s life worse. Are we voting with our brains? Or are we voting because we got our fee-fees hurt by those people who didn’t suck our collective dicks? Goddamn, shit like this should be embarrassing to us all.
/r/MensRights02/12/24 06:58 AM
-14

If you call it “shaming” when he told the trees that they shouldn’t vote for the axe, then I guess I was wrong.
/r/MensRights02/12/24 02:02 AM
-56

Democrats didn’t insult or condescend to men, but Republicans said they did, and men believed it.
/r/MensRights01/12/24 07:24 PM
4

To keep my wife happy I have to do a lo: Be responsible, thoughtful, and proactive, do 50% of chores, make the primary salary (plus pension and health insurance), plan fun things for the family, not spend too much money, make the bed, not sleep too long in the morning, not listen to music too loudly, do weekly yard work (but check with her first about which plants I should trim), shop for the groceries (and let her know if it’s a major or minor shopping trip so that she can give me her list), pr…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/24 10:54 PM
1

Adults in general don’t get a lot of sympathy, at least in the US. Puritanical values have instilled us with this destructive bootstrap mentality that has poisoned our sense of empathy.
/r/MensRights17/11/24 08:42 PM
-14

I had one person (friend of my wife, sorta friend of mine) who bashed men at every turn. I engaged for a while, then decided it wasn’t worth the effort. That is literally the only time I’ve run into a situation that affected me personally in any way, and it was no big whoop. Beyond that, I’ve never had any problems, and I’m convinced that most men (not ALL men) who bitch and moan on this sub have had pretty much the same experience as I. Most of us just hear about it and assume it’s rampant, whe…
/r/MensRights14/11/24 07:35 PM
-2

The irony of course is that every one of Trump’s economic proposals has been soundly lambasted by economists. Tariffs will lead to spikes in consumer prices, additional corporate deregulation will escalate corporate profits and stock buybacks, and deporting millions of undocumented workers will leave crops rotting in the fields, which will send food prices soaring. Sadly, I don’t think he’ll have anyone to counteract his incompetence this time around, and we’ll all feel the sting.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 09:49 PM
-7

Like cutting off your fingers to protest a lack of gloves.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 09:47 PM
-34

It kills me that men get their feelings hurt by the Democrats and as a result vote for the guy who will make our lives worse. It’s not a good look.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 02:02 PM
-2

I suppose that by electing Trump, we’ve proven them right.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 01:42 PM
1

Stats on that, please?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/24 03:09 AM
1

Like this feminist? https://www.reddit.com/r/NotHowGirlsWork/s/xy3xNAbj8e
/r/MensRights09/09/24 02:17 PM
17

This is the world’s dumbest person saying the world’s dumbest thing. If you think you’re an alpha male, or if you strive to become an alpha male, or if you give a moment’s thought to the idea of alpha males, then you are not an alpha male. A true alpha male rejects, or has never heard of the concept of, an alpha male.
/r/MensRights23/08/24 01:00 AM
–

I’m just saying that previous generations of men were as pervy as now. Maybe they didn’t crave the exact same specific acts you have in mind, but they wanted variety and experimentation. I mean jeez, there are ancient Grecian urns with depictions of threesomes, anal intercourse, bestiality, you name it. You think we just fell out of a coconut tree?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 05:03 PM
–

As someone who found out a bit too much about his father after he died, I can assure you that the answer is yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 04:31 PM
1

For most of us, the harm is minimal. I was circumcised but I don’t remember having it done, and I have no basis by which to judge what it’s like to have a foreskin. BUT, I’m opposed to it for others because it’s unnecessary, painful, and there is the risk of a botched surgery that leaves boys/men with permanent damage. That said, I’m pretty happy with my dick as it is, and I’m not upset about it in a personal level.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 11:33 PM
8

No, it’s intended to be ridiculous… to say that if women are forbidden from having an abortion, then the impregnating party should be held fully responsible for his role. It’s ridiculous, but hopefully will make the intended point.
/r/MensRights28/07/24 07:25 AM
1

WTF is wrong with you? Might be mistaken for a Jew or Muslim? I’m opposed to circumcision as well, but not because of religious bigotry.
/r/MensRights28/07/24 06:40 AM
–

This may be the dumbest thing I’ve read in a while.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 08:21 AM
–

It’s no guarantee, though. My wife and I were at it constantly all through dating, and then when living together. We had our second kid, and she turned it off like a faucet.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 01:10 AM
1

The ones I listed were just examples. I mean, there must be something you're interested in, at least a little bit, that isn't racing. To use the example you chose, let's say you go and volunteer at an animal shelter and stick at it for a few months. While you're there, you meet this really nice woman and hit it off. It is totally legit to be able to say, "You know, I am passionate about auto racing. I'm not actually crazy about animals. I was volunteering here because I'm trying to expand my hor…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/24 10:27 PM
2

I think you might mean that having hobbies that are practiced almost entirely by men are useless for meeting women. Try bowling. Or bicycling. Or join a knitting group, or a book club. Join a swim team or a hiking club or a board game club. Volunteer at an animal shelter or at a food bank. These types of hobbies may not be as exciting as driving race cars, but they are enjoyable and much more likely to involve both women and men.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/24 10:10 PM
9

Wow, you’re making laughably untrue claims, then asking people to do their own research to prove YOUR point to themselves? Good luck with that strategy.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 07:44 AM
1

Vasectomies are the bomb.
/r/MensRights15/06/24 07:31 AM
15

Please post links to this groundbreaking research!
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 06:50 AM
2

A) You may be opposed to antinatalists, but that has nothing to do with the happiness of people who disagree with you. B) I’m sure you’re correct that the happiest women you know have kids, but that’s anecdotal evidence based on your self-selected social group, and is not necessarily applicable to the general population.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 01:26 AM
1

Would you rather leave your child alone in a classroom with a bear or a woman? (Spoiler: The answer is a woman. A bear would maul your child to death, which would be catastrophic.)
/r/MensRights12/05/24 06:23 PM
2

Kinda, yeah.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 07:29 AM
1

The Girl Scouts accepted boys long before the Boy Scouts accepted girls. They beat us to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 06:42 AM
1

Disagree. Scouting is about honor, integrity, resourcefulness, independence, competence, courage, and leadership. There is absolutely nothing in that list that is specific to males. Little boys don’t need a safe space away from girls to the degree that scouting needs to be segregated. If nothing else, integrated scouting can produce a generation of men who can respect high-achieving women without seeing them as an obstacle to their own success.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 06:40 AM
-4

I’m pretty ok with this law conceptually (I don’t know all the fine print). Creating artificial porn that is indistinguishable from the real thing has the potential to genuinely destroy people’s lives.
/r/MensRights17/04/24 05:18 AM
1

Watch the movie “Four Weddings and a Funeral” together, then discuss.
/r/MensRights16/04/24 06:24 AM
0

HappyAustrianPainter? Real classy. Nazi has to make it about politics.
/r/MensRights02/04/24 05:35 AM
5

I’m a dude, and it makes zero fucking sense to me. They’re not hurting anyone, and they look like they’re probably fun as hell to hang out with. Who wants to marry a woman who’s not any fun?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/24 12:15 AM
1

Is there any context for the basis of the test? I mean, hey, I don't know all that much about the role frontier women played in the expansion of women's rights in the United States, but there must be some sort of textual basis for the test question. Seems to me that in the "lawless West," there probably WERE greater opportunities for women. They were probably more likely to make their own livings, have some say in civic affairs, perform heavy physical labor... far more than in eastern states. It…
/r/MensRights27/02/24 11:50 PM
1

It's a possibility, but I can't agree that it's a "REAL DANGER." It can happen, it has happened, but it's one of those one-in-a-billion sort of things. The potential for accidental incest doesn't remotely justify the burden of mandatory paternity testing. Mandatory paternity testing could very well be warranted based on the likelihood of a man unknowingly signing on as the father of a child who is not his biological offspring. That scenario is probably a million times more likely than accidental…
/r/MensRights14/02/24 08:18 PM
1

Most? No, I think you're wrong. Other than anecdotal stories, there's not much evidence to suggest that MOST women like to be objectified or leered at. Some? Absolutely. No question. But most? I can't imagine that's the case.
/r/MensRights08/02/24 11:28 PM
0

Don't know if it's a good movie until I've seen it, so I can't really say.
/r/MensRights05/01/24 09:28 PM
-4

I’m sufficiently confident in my masculinity that I don’t mind being made to feel uncomfortable. I love Star Wars, and I hope this is a good movie.
/r/MensRights05/01/24 12:56 AM
-2

Burn capitalism to the fucking ground. Cops are racist pieces of shit. Billionaires should be sliced up and shared for lunch by the masses. Trump is the worst human ever to exist. Labor unions are good. Landlords are bad. The ownership class are parasites that need to be purged for the good of society, and their blood should water the garden of humanity. There is no god. Religion is the disease that will kill humanity. Republicans are the greatest threat to humanity since the invention of the nu…
/r/MensRights13/12/23 05:04 AM
3

That’s not a double standard. It’s closer to supply/demand. If you think a woman needs to do more, then go ahead and wait for that person.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/23 11:45 PM
1

Absolutely! We’d live a messy and tumultuous life, but we’d have lots of fun and fuck constantly. We’d have financial problems, we would be a pretty irresponsible pair when it comes to taking care of long-term responsibilities, but man… the sex would be amazing. Not too keen on her hairy back, but I could manage to see past it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/23 04:20 AM
4

The fact is, people “settle” all the time. Whether it’s a compliment or not, the world is littered with people who marry someone or have sex with someone who is just good enough, instead of ideal. Just as there are guys who’ll have sex with a woman who’s not very attractive simply because he wants sex, there are women who’ll marry lower-value men just because they want to have children. Tale old as time.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/23 02:35 PM
6

Re: erections and arousal... Even if it were true that erections only come with arousal, it is 100% irrelevant. Arousal and consent are entirely different. If I were seduced by a woman who turned me on, I could very well be aroused. But if I know that having sex would endanger my marriage, I would say no. I might be aroused, I might delight in the *idea* of having sex, but I have chosen not to, and have not given consent.
/r/MensRights22/09/23 10:39 PM
1

I agree with your thesis (sort of), but not your examples. Punchline: men do the exact same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/23 06:27 PM
1

Agreed! I also cried like three times, because I felt like the movie very clearly addressed issues both men and women (read: humans) face in the world. People keep going on and on about how it bashes men, or about how it’s a feminist manifesto, or about how it’s a critique of toxic feminism… no one seems to take into account (until the film’s spot-on punchline) that Barbie and Ken dolls don’t have genitals.
/r/MensRights12/08/23 05:56 PM
2

This is the best review I’ve read of the movie, hands down.
/r/MensRights12/08/23 05:32 PM
0

As a non-academic, I am fine with using an occasional colloquialism here and there.
/r/MensRights15/05/23 10:52 PM
13

What did you get your PhD for? And from where? Also, the letters “PhD” don’t precede the name of ANY female academic. They come after the name. This sub could be legitimately useful but for self-righteous blowhards such as yourself.
/r/MensRights15/05/23 09:54 AM
-9

Fox News (and right wing media in general) has a hold on a vast swath of white male viewers, and pumps them full of violent and rhetoric and propaganda.
/r/MensRights26/05/22 05:08 PM
1

I disagree with circumcision. It’s unnecessary and pointless, and I think it’s a bad thing. On an unrelated note, I think the procedure of cliterectomy - which is specifically designed for the inhibition of women’s sexual pleasure, and is thus utilized as an instrument of subjugation - is barbaric, reprehensible, and repugnant to an extreme degree.
/r/MensRights03/10/20 07:33 AM
-1

I have no responses. I’m not here to change anyone’s mind.
/r/MensRights01/10/20 12:23 AM
4

Agreed - totally valid. I just believe that male and female circumcision, while both bad, are separate issues.
/r/MensRights30/09/20 06:16 PM
0

Potentially unpopular opinion here: male circumcision (which I oppose) is not remotely as horrific or damaging as female circumcision. “Female circumcision” shouldn’t even be a term used to describe what they do. It is a cliterectomy, and it’s the physiological equivalent of having the entire head of the penis removed. Male circumcision is unnecessary, stupid, Ill-advised, and pointless. Cliterectomy is barbaric to a much more extreme degree. Comparing male circumcision to female cliterectomy is…
/r/MensRights30/09/20 04:52 PM
-12

Men should stop signing up for the military and working dangerous industrial jobs. Problem 2/5 solved.
/r/MensRights27/08/19 09:17 AM
-5

He could be president, acting like that.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 06:27 AM
2

I am not protecting her, I'm protecting me. I don't want to go through that. Maybe if the trauma were unbearable, but the misery of reporting it would be far worse than the experience itself.
/r/MensRights04/04/17 12:06 AM
2

Thanks for your reassurance - I know it's not my fault. I'm not blaming myself.
/r/MensRights03/04/17 11:38 PM
5

Thanks for your support. I genuinely don't think my psychological trauma will go any further than the fear that this can fuck up my relationship with my wife. Honestly, until she told me that she thought something was up, I was 50% of the way to being over it. It wasn't the kind of assault like getting a broom handle in the ass as part of a hazing ritual, it was a cute drunk girl going down on me. I've had cute drunk girls go down on me before, and it's generally a very nice experience. The only…
/r/MensRights03/04/17 10:25 PM
1

That's the million dollar question, now, isn't it?
/r/MensRights03/04/17 10:20 PM
1

I do love a polite debate. You have made a very thoughtful and convincing point by offering concrete examples, and backing them up with textual references. Well played sir, I have no rebuttal.
/r/MensRights04/03/17 06:22 PM
1

I'm willing to bet she was masturbating at other times, but I never actually asked her. Did she actually DO anything to the sister? Nope. My college roommate masturbated while I was asleep in the same room, but I certainly don't feel like it had any affect on me.
/r/MensRights28/02/17 07:05 PM
0

And did nothing to her sister at that age.
/r/MensRights28/02/17 04:57 AM
1

The video I saw was about 5 minutes long. I think I got the gist.
/r/MensRights28/02/17 03:55 AM
9

There is a vast difference between small children exploring their sexuality and a grown man actively advocating for sex between teens and adults, regardless of sex or gender. If every seven-year-old were held to the same standard as an adult in moral and criminal matters, we would be devoid of innocence.
/r/MensRights27/02/17 06:04 PM
2

There's a vast difference between artistic expression in a play, however odious, and advocating a practice in real life.
/r/MensRights21/02/17 07:25 PM
1

I guess by that token you can hand Jill Stein's votes to H. Plus voter ID laws tend to skew towards lower Democratic turnout, so there's that to consider. Regardless, the "landslide" is electoral, not popular.
/r/MensRights11/11/16 12:17 AM
1

She did win the popular vote, though. Not saying she won the election, nor that she would be a viable candidate in the future (that ship has sailed), but I think that a (as of yet best estimate) 2% lead in the popular vote tells us that the electoral college landslide is a function of the institution, not the will of the population at large.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 10:31 PM
0

I'm very sorry it's not going as well for you as it is for me. So you think it's due entirely (or mostly) to being male?
/r/MensRights10/11/16 10:25 PM
2

As a man who grew up as a boy, I am pretty stoked. Loved every minute of it. Still benefiting from it every day. Couldn't be more pleased.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 08:04 PM
2

Was the value of boys ever in doubt?
/r/MensRights10/11/16 05:04 PM
3

I guess what o meant was not that this particular woman is a hypocrite, but that we hear a lot about manspreading, and nothing about things like this. Perhaps the phrase "double standard" was more appropriate.
/r/MensRights16/09/16 03:00 AM
-2

Fwiw, I have no problem with feminism, just hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights15/09/16 09:22 PM
2

I would venture to speculate that the number of people who will vote for H because she is a woman is about equal to the number of people who won't vote for her for the same reason. Both morons, just different types.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 06:47 PM
1

My super smoking hot cousin (2nd, once removed) only dated linemen from the football team. She told me, "I love those lineman bellies. The bigger the better. If I can get my arms around him, he's too small." So they're out there.
/r/MGTOW12/05/16 07:58 AM
1

I'm sorry if that's the impression I gave, that wasn't my intent.
/r/MensRights21/04/16 05:32 PM
1

With all the complaining I see on this sub about women not dying on the job as often as men, I'm a-OK with this headline.
/r/MensRights21/04/16 03:59 PM
-1

/r/iamverysmart
/r/MGTOW07/04/16 07:24 AM
1

Sounds like you went to the wrong college.
/r/MGTOW07/04/16 06:41 AM
2

Seems to me your issue here should not be with women, but with the stock photo industry.
/r/MGTOW11/03/16 06:10 PM
-1

Everything I have read has always been about felonies - sexual assault, murder, armed robbery, etc. I have never seen anything about minor infractions. Things like jaywalking, shoplifting, etc. Any actual (non-anecdotal) data?
/r/MensRights10/03/16 09:39 PM
18

Where are there stats to back this up? I'm curious to know what she means: "women get handed harsher sentences than men for minor crimes"
/r/MensRights10/03/16 05:22 PM
0

A sitting Vice President of the United States goes on an internationally televised awards program - the most visible and highest rated awards ceremony in the world - and explicitly states TWICE that men can also be victims of sexual assault. It's completely unprecedented. You're pretty tough to please.
/r/MensRights01/03/16 11:05 PM
3

Umm, OK.
/r/MensRights01/03/16 09:28 PM
1

He said nothing about perpetrators, male or female. It was about victims, and was all-inclusive.
/r/MensRights01/03/16 08:23 PM
7

It was fantastic. Biden very specifically included male victims. Twice in the speech. The fact that men were represented on stage is a big step forward in eliminating the stigma attached to being a male victim of sexual assault. Bravo, well done Biden and Gaga.
/r/MensRights01/03/16 08:03 PM
5

I am pretty lukewarm with a lot of the stuff I read on MensRights, but THIS is the kind of shit that pisses me off. LOAD of BULLSHIT.
/r/MensRights16/12/15 07:45 PM
1

"by the time the claim has been adjudicated and due process provided to the accused, if he is found guilty no one is really questioning whether the accuser lied or not" Totally different problem, but you are completely right about it.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 07:04 PM
-3

I'm gonna get into the real semantics of it here, because I agreen with her here. Actual survivors of sexual assault - male or female - DO have the right to be believed. The ones that shouldn't be believed are the ones who are lying, and while I am not convinced that false accusations are as endemic as some folks on this subred say they are, we all know that they exist in at least some cases. So really, if someone is a survivor of assault - sexual or otherwise, I think that person has the right …
/r/MensRights15/09/15 04:39 PM
1

I've seen single dads get cards on Mother's Day, so I have no problem with this either. Doing the work of a dad? Then celebrate as you wish.
/r/MensRights07/09/15 02:51 AM
5

I see this a secondarily a "Men's Rights" issue, and primarily a "What The Fuck Is Wrong With The World?" issue. Not his kid. Not his problem. Fucking ridiculous.
/r/MensRights20/02/15 01:33 AM
1

You mean like those poor Canadians, I assume.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 05:05 PM
1

It's sad how many profoundly stupid Americans there are.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 04:38 PM
-4

If I speak out on one issue, it therefore necessarily means that I don't care about any other issues.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 06:09 AM
27

Gyms are not dangerous for women, unless you don't know how to use the weights or the machines, and then all you have to do is ask the person at the front desk, and I'm sure he or she would be happy to show you.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 02:36 AM
3

My favorite thing about Obama is that he has done (as he said he would before he was first elected) things that I, as a staunch liberal, disagree with. He has done fantastic liberal things, and he's done some pretty unimpressive conservative things. This is what compromise looks like. This is what governing looks like. This is what it means to lead for a country, not an ideology. In contrast, I must consider the "Party of Hell No" or our last president, who famously said, "Either you are with us…
/r/MensRights10/02/15 02:33 AM
-1

My favorite letter to a newspaper editor ever: http://www.freep.com/story/opinion/readers/2014/11/07/obama-election-republicans-gop-democrats-senate/18606217/
/r/MensRights10/02/15 02:25 AM
-7

The men's rights movement has some serious issues that we have to deal with, and whining that the president isn't calling out women for beating men gives me a real limp one.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 02:23 AM
0

I'm not worried. I thought the analogy was weak, because boobs are not innately sexual, whereas balls are 100% about reproduction. When there are actual things to worry about, this one feels like a stretch.
/r/MensRights10/12/14 08:06 PM
30

Except that babies are hard-wired to look at boobies, as that is the natural source of their food. So if there were a post about a baby looking at balls, then yes, it would be super creepy, and rightfully so. The linked post is not creepy.
/r/MensRights10/12/14 07:47 PM
1

I agree with the petty part. Telling someone he has body issues is kind of mean, though.
/r/MensRights21/11/14 06:46 PM
1

I'm guessing that you'd have no issues, then, with communal women's showers and individual showers for men? Would that seem right to you?
/r/MensRights21/11/14 05:59 PM
1

Excellent point about menstruation. I have no issue with different accommodations based on actual differences in need, and I'm glad you pointed that out.
/r/MensRights21/11/14 05:56 PM
1

I agree that it seems unfair. However, in the wake of SHIRTGATE, I am of the opinion that MRAs, just as feminists, should save the fight for things that matter. Custody laws, consent rules, due process after rape accusations, etc. These are the fights that seem valid. Shower arrangements at the gym? That's about as important as the various issues I see in Tumblr Feminism that make me want to tear my hair out. The petty arguments detract from the validity of the important ones.
/r/MensRights21/11/14 05:53 PM
20

As I always say, no outfit says, "Rape me." But some of them say "Lookie here, everyone!"
/r/MensRights08/10/14 11:41 PM
2

Some dads are involved. Those are not the dads for whom this advice is intended. What I see at my kid's school, however, suggests that (at least in my community) the moms do all-or-most of the stuff in that list, and work outside the home as well. So if that advice is not right for you, then ignore it. The dads out there who need to step it up a bit, on the other hand, should take note.
/r/MensRights01/10/14 04:28 PM
4

My wife and I apparently rape each other almost constantly.
/r/MensRights29/09/14 06:06 PM
1

"I thought so too, until I actually read up on it and learned about the actual issues that the movement addresses."
/r/MensRights09/09/14 05:13 PM
2

While it's unfair on face value, I think that somewhere in this argument, you have to recognize that there is a difference between fairness and equality. Look at this as a statistics game: it's very likely that the number of women who are leered at in the gym by men is higher than the converse. It's also very likely that the percentage of leered-at women who feel uncomfortable is higher than the percentage of leered-at men who feel uncomfortable. There are actual real differences in the gym when…
/r/MensRights22/08/14 06:20 PM
1

I agree. My point remains.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 11:29 PM
1

"Bad" or "good" places more of a value label on it than I'd like to, but regardless, it dilutes the pro-active goals that I think might be more valuable to us in the long run, and certainly would help people understand that MR has valid goals outside what appears to be woman-bashing.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 08:22 PM
0

I've said before, and still believe, that there should be a MensRights subred, and an AntiFeminst and/or AntiWoman subred. And they should be kept separate. There is no doubt that lots of the MRAs around here are woman haters or feminism haters. Not all MRAs, but let's not fool ourselves. Any of the guys who want to rant about how terrible feminists are should head on over to some other subred where they can whine all they want without sullying the name and reputation of the MR movement. Anti-wo…
/r/MensRights27/05/14 07:10 PM
3

Biological child I've never met? No problem.
/r/MensRights19/05/14 05:58 AM
18

I think it's completely wrong. The biological parent was undoubtedly wronged in this situation, but the damage to the kid at this point will be irreparable. The best solution would be for the bio parent to have visiting rights. Those who made it possible for the child to be taken away should be prosecuted for fraud. But taking a 9-year-old from her home is unconscionable, and should not be done.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 11:10 PM
2

Exactly. This is how I feel about the death penalty. If there is ANY doubt, then the death penalty should not be used. Even if there is video but the defendant says, "That's not me, I didn't do it," then I think there is some sliver of doubt, and there should be no death penalty. BUT, if it's someone like Richard Ramirez (the Night Stalker), who openly admitted to killing people and enjoying it, then there's no penalty bad enough. Same with this guy. If he didn't do it, then this is an absolute …
/r/MensRights25/04/14 07:53 PM
7

I thought he'd been convicted. I stand corrected.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 07:05 PM
5

Are people cheering the rape, or are people cheering a monster getting a bit of what he doled out? People love revenge stories. This guy is pretty hard to feel sorry for.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 06:48 PM
-1

Popular kid beats on unpopular kid, no one moves a muscle. Unpopular kid beats up on popular kid, other kids react. She seems to be a shitty little girl. I hope she gets the punishment she deserves. I knew kids like that, and they grew up to be shitty people - I think she will do the same. But I don't see this as a men vs. women issue. It's a shitty kid against a chubby unpopular kid.
/r/MensRights10/04/14 11:45 PM
-1

Just one person, and that was her brother.
/r/MensRights10/04/14 11:32 PM
-21

Not really a men's rights issue. Would be just as justifiable regardless of gender.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 07:18 PM
1

Here's an opinion that's going to be unpopular with both the MRA's AND the feminists: I love it when women wear skirts. I love looking at their legs. I like getting an accidental little flash of underwear. I hate that the stupid MRA line on this basically is "Wear pants if you don't want to have your underwear surreptitiously photographed." If you guys get what you want, then we're not going to have much opportunity to enjoy women in skirts. Now, is that what we really want?
/r/MensRights10/03/14 08:12 PM
7

No, if she's given you explicit permission, then you're performing a consensual act. But if you're stupid enough to film it and put it on line, then you're probably too stupid to be having sex in the first place.
/r/MensRights14/12/13 01:03 AM
3

Innocent? Maybe. Guilty? Maybe. Stupid? NO FUCKING DOUBT. Edit: I mean, seriously. I think that while it's not OK to blame the victim in rape, there's also such a thing as being smart. If a woman is raped when walking drunk down a dark alley in a stripper outfit, it's not her fault she's raped, but it's a bad decision for her to put herself in that position. By that same token, what kind of FUCKING MORON posts a video of himself having sex with an unconscious woman? Make a smart decision, you id…
/r/MensRights14/12/13 12:51 AM
1

Didn't say they were the worst. But the biggest.
/r/MensRights05/12/13 08:34 PM
0

I'd be less upset about the rest if God was real. At least then there would be an actual reason for all the rest of the stupid bullshit they do.
/r/MensRights05/12/13 04:25 AM
1

I have no real grievances against feminism. Some feminists are terrible people. Some are wonderful. Some men are terrible people. Some are wonderful. Anyone who wants to have the same rights as anyone else should pursue that goal. Anyone who wants to act like an asshole is an asshole. The Catholic church is the world's largest institution based on people having an imaginary friend in common.
/r/MensRights05/12/13 01:21 AM
-7

In protesting the hypocrisy of the church, I hope that they would have treated any women defending the cathedral just as poorly. Give me hypocritical feminists over the hypocritical Catholic church any day.
/r/MensRights04/12/13 07:23 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter