TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ScipioMoroder Archive

View 2 posts and 26 comments by ScipioMoroder on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

She sounds like one of those "divine femininity" people, absolutely insufferable.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/23 02:48 PM
1

Why are drug dealers inherently bad people or abusers? Ironically one of the nicest guy I've known was a drug dealer lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/23 09:01 PM
1

Actually chimps and bonobos have intermixed before, due to the level of the Congo River decreasing and increasing due to climate change. With bonobos, they represent an offshoot of chimpanzees thought to have "self domesticated". It's been theoretized due to lack of competition with gorillas and more ground cover, the females were less dispersed throughout their environment, meaning they stayed together more to fend off male aggression, gradually leading to the matriarchal nature of bonobos. As …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/23 06:51 PM
1

My post was more on sex-segregated heirarchies (males dominating other males, females dominating other females) which is something that we definitely still have in our species. With sex based heirarchies, humans are probably the most (or closest to) egalitarian species of ape.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/23 09:29 AM
0

They don't "control" the males, they are just collectively dominant over them, bonobo troops are led by the most dominant, experienced female, although certain males (usually the sons of high ranking females) do outrank lower ranking females.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/23 09:26 AM
2

How is this a 'myth'?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/23 11:58 PM
1

This is not true at all. All primate societies have one dominant male who's dominant over the other males and a dominant female who's dominant over the other females. The dominant male in chimpanzees, however, is dominant over both all males and the collective group, while for bonobos it's the opposite. Bonobos probably wouldn't be described as "matriarchal" like chimpanzees couldn't really be described as "patriarchal", but female bonobos collectively dominate over the males and the alpha femal…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/23 08:41 PM
3

Bonobos are unusual among apes for their matriarchal social structure (extensive overlap between the male and female hierarchies leads some to refer to them as gender-balanced in their power structure). Bonobos do not have a defined territory and communities will travel over a wide range. Due to the nomadic nature of the females and evenly distributed food in their environment, males do not gain any obvious advantages by forming alliances with other males, or by defending a home range, as chimpa…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/23 02:29 PM
6

Yeah...this isn't really all that true. I think Frans De Waal has said something like 95% of our behavior is primate based, and neither chimps or bonobos are more "instinct driven" than humans. They have individual tendencies, personalities, self awareness and have to mostly learn how to survive on their own or in their community with specific cultures and social etiquette.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/23 02:17 PM
1

Honestly that seems, unironically, way less realistic than anything I've mentioned on this thread for something much more low tech (no tech?).
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/23 01:01 AM
0

I think there will be benefits for both men and women. Gay and lesbian couples, trans people/gender dysmorphic people, people who want to overcome issues related to sexual dimorphism, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/23 12:50 AM
1

Mass production? Realistically not for a long time. It'll likely be similar to in vitro or cloning pets now. An expensive, niche procedure, although it will inevitably become a reality, because anything done in a lab on non-human mammals can be replicated with humans, the question is will it be legally approved. And this is mostly a casual conversation. It seems kind of strange to be this combative or negative about a discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/23 12:48 AM
1

Yeah, I don't disagree, and that might be for the better societal wise tbh. But I feel like it'll be a rough transition (no pun intended) with a lot or cultural and societal backlash until there's an inevitable acceptance, at least by the majority of society.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/23 12:45 AM
1

...? I'm not sure I follow, everything I've mentioned on this thread are things that we've been capable of doing with mice or other animals, so it's not exactly "sci-fi". Experimental, but not exactly magical for the very near future, anymore than artificial insemination or cloning were.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/23 12:30 AM
1

Artificial wombs would likely be used more initially for helping premature babies develop in an environment where they can grow to term, then eventually for endangered species, and possibly same sex couples. It's not exactly sci fi either, just in very early stages. We've already been able to grow shark fetuses to term in primitive artificial wombs as well as keep a sheep embryo alive for a few days. It's inevitable we'll figure out how to bring a mouse or lamb embryo from a fertilized egg to a …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/23 12:21 AM
0

What do you think about transhumanism and how it will change gender dynamics?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/23 12:16 AM
0

I'm not asking how it relates to the redpill, I'm asking what redpillers and bluepillers think about transhumanism...
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/23 11:56 PM
3

I guess that's kind of the point. Like recently scientists were able to create mice born to two fathers, years after having creating an embryo using the DNA of two female mice. Scientists have even been able to modify the sexual reproductive organs of mice, giving a male mouse ovaries. Given this, it doesn't seem out of the realm of possibility that we could see this eventually refined and applied to humans. And we've also been investing into research into artificial wombs to potentially grow em…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/23 11:51 PM
12

That's because those people aren't living on Reddit, they're actually going outside, interacting with people, forming friends and peer groups and generally just being normal humans. 90% of the weird analysis of dating or relationships on subs like this are completely and utterly autistic and essentially misrepresent normal human interaction.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/23 07:18 AM
3

This seems to track with most of my male friends/coworkers. I don't know where this idea that most men overly care about a woman being a virgin or basically a virgin comes from. Because from my experience, most men with sexual experience want a woman that knows how to please them and knows how she wants to be pleased. Nor do most women I know want to throw themselves at a man whore but aren't overly concerned with the men's past sexual partners either unless they're constantly communicating with…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/23 05:05 PM
2

I think the whole body count thing is largely exaggerated by internet redpill types. Sure, most men don't want to have sex with a whore, but most human beings are reasonable and are willing to sacrifice some of their preferences for a person they perceive as being Mr/Mrs. Perfect. Like most men who are active in the dating sphere are not overly concerned with this incel idea of the innocent virgin, because that's not realistic nor is it necessarily preferable for good sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/23 04:57 PM
1

What social safety nets even exist in the US at this point? SNAP/food stamps? WIC? Medicaid? We have the worst social welfare systems of any developed country...
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/23 02:45 PM
2

Honestly most of them seem to be extremely religious to me, constantly justifying their ideology with Biblical quotes.
/r/ExRedPill03/03/23 10:17 AM
2

Human beings do not work in a society for sex, they work in society because it provides a societal support system where they have access to food, shelter, water, electricity and protection of the elements and wilderness. Asexual people do not get jobs to have sex, they get jobs so that they have a suitable quality of life to survive and then some.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/23 06:18 AM
2

That's not what the article says at it, it just says that there are slightly more mothers than fathers.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/23 06:12 AM
1

Humanity
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/23 06:08 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter