TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ScottieLikesPi Archive

View 1 post and 63 comments by ScottieLikesPi on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
9

I assume they mean prostitutes, women who choose to sell their bodies for money. There's been a market for men wanting sex for thousands of years, and yes some women are exploited by this practice due to societal pressures of needing work and money to survive. However, claiming that there is an 'army' of them out there is ludicrous, especially since in most places, prostitution is illegal. If this person's claim was real, then prostitution would not only be legal, it would be granted special pri…
/r/FeminismStopsWhen16/10/21 06:33 PM
48

I am not a lawyer but: It's less she gets a plea deal and reduced sentence and more the prosecution wants to avoid the headache of a trial. Trials take a long time and cost a lot of money, and there's a chance that a jury of her 'peers' would let her go because of some stupid reason. This way, while the sentence isn't as harsh, the prosecution avoids a lot of extra work and can focus on more crimes, while still ensuring she gets punished. Not saying this is somehow justice just pointing to the r…
/r/PussyPass04/06/20 11:28 AM
3

Yeah good luck enforcing that with a crew mostly under 22.
/r/MensRights10/01/20 12:09 PM
31

As an engineer, I can tell you where the women in the field go: architecture. I'm not joking, we have our building split by the engineering floor and the architectural floor, and the architectural floor is dominated by women, while the engineering floor is dominated by men. Women architects are really good at what they do, and there's a lot of back and forth between our group and theirs. Plus, architects these days have far more control over how a building looks and functions than engineers, so …
/r/PussyPass29/08/19 10:43 AM
2

I can assure you this isn't their official policy, and likely mandated by forces outside their control. I'm a consultant and the projects I work on almost always have 2 restrooms. It's either one is for men and the other women, or they're both unisex. I've never seen a women's and unisex restroom combo, and I've covered from Seattle to New York. That doesn't mean I've seen ALL the Starbucks, just the ones I've personally worked on. What's likely happened is either the local codes dictated this, …
/r/MensRights25/08/19 06:56 AM
17

What was the point of making a point about her weight and race? It's a descriptor, nothing more.
/r/MensRights07/05/19 07:27 PM
12

Don't suppose you grew up in southeast Arkansas did you?
/r/MensRights07/05/19 03:32 PM
125

I was in high school long ago and the topic of the draft came up. A large (extremely obese) black girl in the back said, "hmm bye bye boys!" The teacher responded, "There's talk of including women in the draft." This was in 2003 during the opening of the Iraq War. Same black girl, "oh hell naw!" Yeah. First exposure to toxic attitudes regarding this issue.
/r/MensRights07/05/19 12:04 PM
1

Architect and client preference, local building code, area of the country, local jurisdiction.
/r/MensRights14/04/19 12:27 AM
1

Starbucks tends to either have a male and female, or unisex. Depends on the size of the store and a host of other factors. I work as a consultant so that's how I know. If the store is small and they've only got one, it'll always be unisex. If it's got two, it depends on a host of factors.
/r/MensRights13/04/19 11:30 PM
10

That's just... So wrong
/r/MensRights07/04/19 04:59 PM
15

Why? I mean, is it insurance money? I mean, that's how you combat the problem when money is involved, you follow the money.
/r/MensRights07/04/19 04:02 PM
7

We're looking at it here in Arkansas...
/r/MensRights24/02/19 12:21 PM
2

It's ok, our governor just signed a bill trying to make abortions more difficult to obtain. For every step forward we take two backwards.
/r/MensRights21/02/19 03:50 AM
12

I had a job in Louisiana about a decade ago and there was this guy, really nice, who was openly gay. He got run off the road into a ditch and died, and practically all his co-workers showed up to his funeral. Pastor decided to use the venue to preach the while of homosexuality and how the guy was going to hell. Was very confused why everyone was mad at him.
/r/MensRights27/01/19 01:15 PM
2

I agree with your point that my post was a bit misleading upon reflection, but I think the point still stands that someone along the line dropped the ball and now the Norwegian Navy just lost the equivalent of a full year's budget. Someone is going to get an early retirement.
/r/MensRights13/12/18 01:04 PM
10

Ok so here's the thing. It doesn't matter that 4 out of 5 of the ships navigators were women. What happened was a lack of experience and training not just on the navigator's part but the command structure of the ship. Every command aboard a Navy vessel is given by the commander on deck, and often confirmed with a repeat of that command to make sure it was heard correctly. If the person in command issues the order and it leads to the ship collision, then it's the commander's fault. If the command…
/r/MensRights13/12/18 11:39 AM
4

Just remember there are people who think the Earth is flat, fluoride in the water makes you gay, and then there's people who post videos like this. https://youtu.be/_c6HsiixFS8?t=9
/r/MensRights27/10/18 12:42 AM
8

No because they're smarter than that. They know the second they lay a hand on her, she's screaming about assault and then they're in jail. Probably get the charges for beating the kid tossed in too just because.
/r/MensRights19/10/18 12:58 AM
8

So alimony is where, following a divorce, one of the now legally separated pair must send money to the other. The reasons vary but most of the time it's cited because the partner receiving money stayed at home, thus putting their career on hold to raise children. Most of the time, the recipient of alimony is the woman. The reason this is a point of contention is because some women (key word: some) marry deliberately to divorce and receive alimony from their rich husbands. Other times, the woman …
/r/MensRights16/10/18 10:39 AM
1

Did... Did you even read what I wrote? Seriously. I said you cannot compare the slight bodily mutilation of getting your fingernails or hair cut to the issue of abortion. That is all I said. I like people... They annoy me at times when they fail to live up to their potential, but I don't hate anyone with the exception of a small handful of people. Other than that, I think everyone is inherently good until driven to be otherwise.
/r/MensRights15/10/18 12:28 AM
4

That's a totally different issue though, isn't? I mean, technically any time you shave, clip your nails, get a haircut, that's a form of bodily mutilation, just as if you got a tattoo or piercing. We just think nothing of it because it's seen as hygenic and polite by society. ​ Abortions and murder, meanwhile... yeah, that's completely different.
/r/MensRights14/10/18 08:23 PM
4

The law was passed by the state legislature which means that since the governor signed it into law, only the judiciary is left to find daily with the case without the current batch of representatives or the governor is voted out and they decide to draft a new piece of legislation that removed this one from the books, which in a place like California is like political suicide. More than likely a local judge will find the case legal for whatever reason, so the lawsuit will get kicked upstairs to t…
/r/MensRights11/10/18 07:07 AM
13

Prediction: California will start to refuse businesses licenses to out of state corporations that so not have women on their board.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 01:12 AM
3

On the one hand, it's nice that they at least said it was sexist that the man only saw women as disposable. At least they're somewhat acknowledging that, but given that they have a ton of other important issues at the moment, I'd say worrying about an advertisement is rather... well, irresponsible.
/r/MensRights26/09/18 02:40 AM
2

To be fair I could completely see Lucifer managing a large project, given he led a full blown rebellion and paved a highway to Earth just so he could fuck with Jehova's plans. Gabriel I'm not so sure, my Paradise Lost is a bit rusty. Lucifer may have a few issues, but never let it be said he's lazy.
/r/MensRights07/09/18 02:50 AM
9

I'm pretty sure the high taxes were already doing that. https://chiefexecutive.net/business-exodus-california-troubling-sanctuary-policies/ Also as someone who deals with state and federal building codes, it's total BS that even the strictest code elsewhere is nothing compared to California's. Everything is stricter, harder to make work, and it's all a giant scam so you have to resubmit and pay more fees.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 11:32 PM
14

I can't speak for the majority but I think a large concern on this sub are not the 99% who will roll their eyes and move on, it's the fear that a small percentage will see this and take it seriously. Some will agree, and the circle jerk starts. Other than that though yeah, I can kinda see it as a joke.
/r/MensRights30/08/18 02:47 AM
10

If I remember correctly, someone mentioned the reason for posting names and photos of the accused was to hold the police accountable. You can't just get charged with a crime and 'disappear', though that does lead to the problem of someone getting a blemish that companies like those asshats that post mugshots love to exploit. There are pros and cons to both. But I also highly doubt it's worth a civil lawsuit given she probably doesn't have the type of money that would justify the damages done, ev…
/r/MensRights26/08/18 01:18 PM
1

To be fair I don't think they make women's boxers that often. Panties sure, but not boxers.
/r/MensRights29/07/18 06:41 PM
1

I'm seeing a lot of comments back and forth either that pink tax products are just over marketed or they're designed better and I genuinely believe it falls on both, because they know a lot of women buy products geared towards them and those who want to put effort into themselves to look good and this want a more specialized product that caters to a demand for higher quality, while men usually view products as "will it work? Y\N?" You are all correct that women can use products geared at men jus…
/r/MensRights29/07/18 06:37 PM
5

This is one of those cases where I think this Jackie lady would try to ban men from the beach so women can have a safe, private space to walk around in bikinis without having vile men looking at them. Of course, the real reason is she wants to establish a double standard where men are clearly in the wrong and no amount of spin will fix it. Thankfully, a lot of people see through her attempts and shut her down. I am a huge fan of the last tweet: What are you, the fun police?
/r/MensRights07/07/18 11:57 AM
1

Calls for increased diversity in films is not the issue. It's weird, but you'll generally find reviewers who have bias actually have consumers who share that bias, and no not the negative ones the filmmakers think is going on. Everyone has a bias based on their background and history, and so it's not uncommon to reflect that in your work. A straight white man will have a different perspective than a straight white woman, or gay white man. People who read reviews look for relevance to their own e…
/r/MensRights22/06/18 12:44 PM
1

Actually it might have been the decision of the Architectural firm that designed the store. I work as an electrical designing consultant and the way it works is Corporate hires an Architectural firm to handle everything from designing the store to getting the engineered drawings signed to pulling permits and overseeing construction. Typically what happens is the Architects design the building and designate the various rooms, where they want equipment, etc. and then the consultants who specialize…
/r/MensRights12/06/18 10:17 PM
11

The guy is emotionally dependent on his MIL and is driving a wedge between him and his wife because of it. The situation is less about men's rights and more the emotional divide forming because the family is obviously going through problems. He's clearly not emotionally mature enough to see this and so probably isn't a good father to help raise the child. If she gets a divorce before the baby is born then she'd have full custody of the child anyway. Honestly, the situation is fucked up and I agr…
/r/MensRights10/06/18 04:17 AM
12

Nappy is a diaper. A stone is 14lbs., so he weighed 84 pounds when he died.
/r/MensRights09/06/18 06:32 PM
6

The entire article raises the debate on where and when it's alright for a university to get involved in the private affairs of students when it's become almost institutionalized to simply run to the "grown ups" and say "he touched me!" It's the mentality of schoolyard tantrums where one child doesn't get to play the game their way and so runs to an authority figure, often under the belief that the authority will side with them because they got there first. Every time you hear of someone being bo…
/r/MensRights01/06/18 06:07 PM
55

Jordan Peterson uses this article to reference other articles and clarify his position that the socially enforced monogamous relationship (marriage) decrease make violence as a result of not having to compete for a sexual partner. His clarification is that, unlike what his attackers claim, he is not advocating for any kind of government oversight assigning one man and one woman to become a couple. Rather, the social evolution of having monogamous relationships benefits both sexes, as it turns me…
/r/MensRights20/05/18 12:03 PM
338

The article explains that, using Title IX, the Department of Education's Office of Civil Rights is investigating the following 7 organizations: The Women Faculty Forum; Working Women's Network; The Yale University Women's Organization; Yale Women's Campaign School; Yale Women Innovators; Smart Women Securities; and Women Empowering Women Leadership Conference. The 10 other organizations that discriminate against men were dismissed because they either are not exclusive to women or are private or …
/r/MensRights19/05/18 10:09 PM
3

Problem is proving it without a shadow of a doubt, which is hard enough to do against a single person, let alone an entire group. If the piece says they're Nazis, and just one person can be linked to a neo Nazi organization, they can point and go "see! It's true!"
/r/MensRights19/05/18 10:47 AM
4

Having watched the video, it sounds like someone using buzzwords and current events to earn money off the paranoid fears of people. "Why risk working in an office when someone might hurt your feelings or risk ruining their own careers when you can pay $2,000 to work somewhere that men aren't allowed?" I like that they acknowledged this isn't the end all solution, but it still seems their main goal is to cash in on rampant fears of women. That only works, however, if you have the cash to pay for …
/r/MensRights17/05/18 04:28 AM
3

To be fair seeing someone in pain and being unable to help, then feeling uncomfortable, shows empathy. You want to help but can't and so feel useless, making it worse.
/r/MensRights17/05/18 04:00 AM
2

The article itself is heavily biased, that much is obvious, so I'm going to take some of what they say with a grain of salt. However, if their reports are true, it could lead to numerous issues in stem fields. Removing the baseline qualifications for certain groups to enter doctorate programs, of which there are only so many spots, means that if you are required to prove your qualifications while someone else isn't, it will brew resentment and mistrust, meaning that person will probably face mor…
/r/MensRights16/05/18 02:25 AM
15

My question is, if the older woman suffered mental illness and assaulted someone, shouldn't she he placed in an institution? She is clearly a danger to both herself and society at large. And honestly, in regards to being "emotionally immature", it reminds me of a lot of people who should have gone to jail and learned their actions have consequences. The fact they didn't and act the way they do just shows how sometimes a little "tough love" can help. Not advocating undue sentencing, just that the…
/r/MensRights16/05/18 01:56 AM
-1

Just pointing this out but there's an identical post from a different paper on this subreddit. Thanks bye.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 01:48 AM
260

The entire altercation send like something you'd see on cops in a trailer park except in reverse. She was drinking all day, saw him lose on national TV, then started screaming at him when he got home. Mother in law stepped in, she started attaching the mother in law, so the husband stepped in and she started beating him. Then, when police arrive, he tries to claim there was no physical altercation even while she's fighting the police and kicking and screaming, including such gems as This is why …
/r/MensRights16/05/18 01:41 AM
-8

I never said you were ugly, and the point was to become a better person. If you forgot the /s, then maybe this'll remind you next time. You can be whatever you want to be, and if you choose to be a terrible person, that's on you. If you choose to be a better person, then that's also on you. You are what you choose to be. Get yourself help if you need it, find the solutions you need, learn from your mistakes, and move on. Like Doc Brown told Marty, The future is what you make it, so make it a goo…
/r/MensRights24/04/18 07:28 AM
-3

No. Hell no. Nothing justifies Sharia law, and you should be ashamed for thinking that way. People are not slaves, and thinking it's ok to say this shows how misguided you really are. If you don't like women, then fine. But saying women deserve to be treated as second class citizen is where you have officially gone off the deep end. Women should not be forced to serve you as a slave just because you hear where someone was manipulated and used. You're getting your info from a group dedicated to f…
/r/MensRights24/04/18 06:31 AM
2

I believe they're a recognized monopoly in the United States and for the longest time they were to be arrested if they ever arrived in the US. I don't know if that's still true, but it shows that most governments know they're a corrupt monopoly.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 03:59 PM
1

I'd say he's actually hurting them where they notice: Revenue. Ad Blockers may not seem like much, but it's the same reason the MPAA and RIAA got so pissy about illegal downloads. One person doing it isn't a problem. It's when a million people do it that it becomes an issue.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 06:07 AM
8

Gonna put the brakes on ya there. Seriously, you think it's wrong that a group was given the right to vote? What other groups shouldn't be allowed basic human rights?
/r/PussyPass01/01/18 02:14 AM
1

I think the article was trying to point out that by having the man take out trash, it creates an imbalance that needs to be addressed eventually.
/r/PussyPass31/12/17 07:06 AM
61

I read the article and took away several key points. The committee tasked with finding if there was a gender-based wage gap was entirely female, including professors and assistant professors with a vested interest in the results of their own study and conclusions. The union representing the professors did not contest the conclusion and failed to properly respect the male professors, all of whom were excluded from the pay increase. 60% of all female professors were able to be paired with a male p…
/r/PussyPass26/12/17 07:07 AM
16

Men in general are punished far harsher than women. It's scary to think two people can commit the same crime and get handed different sentences based on nothing more than their gender.
/r/PussyPass24/08/17 01:45 AM
5

So, what we have here is a complex issue made worse by the judge's statement. The woman's guilty of several prior crimes, meaning this isn't her first rodeo. Not only that, but she has a child at home, and is addicted to hard drugs that clearly are part of the problem. Now, I don't have all the facts, but this is a clear case of "Damned if you do, damned if you don't." While the man was clearly terrified and it was an occupied home she burgled, it might simply not be worth it to throw her in jai…
/r/PussyPass23/08/17 08:14 PM
10

I can sorta see where they're coming from, given the girl was only 16 and probably very naive, but I'm also amazed that this was able to happen in the first place. She obviously knew the couple in question given she maintained contact after giving the baby up, so it wasn't her dropping the baby off at a police or fire station anonymously. This means that while she was pregnant, she received attention from the couple, likely in the form of financial support, to ensure the baby didn't have issues …
/r/PussyPass23/08/17 03:52 AM
7

The legal term is Quid pro quo and is illegal in most if not all places (not a lawyer). It's a form of sexual harassment and in this case, even if the student consented, it can be argued that he only did so because he was aware she could abuse her power and give him bad grades. Even if she never made the threat, that is still a distinct possibility, along with the threat afterwards that if he says anything to anyone about it, she can do the same. In essence, without having to say it, she has pow…
/r/PussyPass21/07/17 03:10 AM
13

She was sentenced to 1 month work release and 2 months electronic home monitoring. Her main target was wealthy business men with families that she could threaten and blackmail for money, which is how she got caught. She threatened a California man who helped the FBI record the phone call where she threatened him because he was behind on his $10,000/month payment to her. She claims that she feels genuine remorse after her LinkedIn profile was hacked and she was bullied on social media, which is w…
/r/PussyPass16/07/17 04:31 PM
2

No, acknowledging that you understand your Miranda rights places you under oath. You acknowledge that everything you say can have binding legal ramifications.
/r/PussyPass13/06/17 06:22 PM
1

The Miranda rights state "You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can be used against you in a court of law. You have a right to an attorney, if you cannot afford an attorney, one will be provided to you. Do you understand the rights I just told you?" These words must be said before any interrogation by police in regards to a crime where statements are being recorded. They only apply where a statement intended for the court is being taken and even then, there are times these statem…
/r/PussyPass13/06/17 10:34 AM
3

Maybe. If the police can take it to a judge and he finds sufficient cause then yes. It depends on the judge and if the police were there already after the supposed "suicide". I would imagine the evidence is already cataloged though so they might have a peek again to see if there's anything new. If not, the crime scene may have been turned back over to her and it's already too contaminated to gather more.
/r/PussyPass12/06/17 05:00 PM
7

Usually that wire is there to catch specifics of a crime that can then be substantiated with other evidence. On its own it is useless. Same here in that if they can use what she said to find more evidence then it could be used, but not on its own.
/r/PussyPass12/06/17 04:18 PM
34

Here's the problem. You can claim anything while not under oath and it doesn't mean a thing. It's only when you are under oath can your words be used against you. The DA's office can't use her statement as an admission of guilt because she wasn't under oath and so must have hard evidence she actually committed the crime. If they don't have sufficient evidence, then it's not just a waste of time and resources, but makes a future chance of putting her away even harder because there will need to be…
/r/PussyPass12/06/17 03:29 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter