TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Scottmk4 Archive

View 1 posts and 163 comments by Scottmk4 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-2

National socialists are a flavor of Left even if the rest of the left doesn’t like them.
/r/MensRights01/02/18 12:46 PM
1

It can be both a net drain and providing a job. Providing a job is not sufficient evidence to show that the money was well spent. Taxing people to pay people to dig holes and fill them afterwards would be both. I’m not advocating that we get rid of government. Government has a role. It’s protecting individual rights. No other institution can do that nearly as effectively. That doesn’t mean that any other activity should get a pass. It’s important to remember that no one would have sat on this mo…
/r/MensRights23/01/18 04:48 PM
7

Those jobs will be paid for with taxes. It’s a net drain on the economy. If the funds didn’t need to be inefficiently diverted through government to perform a job that shouldn’t have needed to be done, then they could have been spent on something actually useful. See: Broken Window Fallacy
/r/MensRights23/01/18 02:01 PM
0

Non authoritarian left is fantasy. There’s no way for wealth redistribution, central planning, or seizing the means of production / all property, without force and authoritarianism. If all of that is off the menu, exactly what is left that is left wing?
/r/MensRights10/01/18 05:01 PM
2

I’m guessing about google’s argument, not stating my own opinion.
/r/MensRights09/01/18 09:52 PM
-24

We are doing our best to adhere to both the spirit and letter of the state’s anti discrimination laws which were clearly written to protect disadvantaged minorities from discrimination. Without this understanding of the law, tech will become even whiter and more male than it already is. No one wants that. Edit: wow that’s a lot of downvotes for guessing what their argument will be.
/r/MensRights09/01/18 05:14 PM
2

The left is authoritarian. There’s no other way to achieve their goals.
/r/MensRights09/01/18 02:01 PM
9

You’ve conflated liberal with the left. There’s nothing liberal about the left. The left has never been about more freedom. They’ve promised more stuff, but freedom isn’t how they want to get there.
/r/MensRights08/01/18 10:45 PM
8

This is like arguing that people who take a second job should get paid more by the first job because they have a harder life. If you didn’t want the extra work, you shouldn’t have taken on another job. It’s not the job of the first employer to compensate you for that. If you want to argue that the taxpayer should subsidize you for making that choice, it would at least universalize the problem. It doesn’t solve it, because as a taxpayer, I don’t want to subsidize your choices anymore than your em…
/r/MensRights05/01/18 03:23 PM
28

Never really had
/r/MensRights02/01/18 10:27 PM
12

I don’t think it’s reasonable or accurate to call feminism or communism “equality movements.” Neither of them want equality. They want power and control.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 03:14 PM
12

They'll claim sovereign immunity. The government has to choose to allow itself to be sued.
/r/MensRights07/11/17 01:20 PM
5

That Man was Winston Churchill.
/r/MensRights02/11/17 10:47 PM
1

A state that went for Trump in a country that went for Trump can't buy into SJW nonsense very much, whatever other flaws it may have.
/r/MensRights28/10/17 03:03 PM
17

Seems more like you are becoming like Sweden. Ultra left wing feminists run everything, and bring in vast numbers of Muslim immigrants with very little interest in assimilating or even following the law. The government will then lie to hide the consequences of both because the consequences are "racist" and "sexist." It's time for anyone that values individual rights to get out.
/r/MensRights27/10/17 11:07 PM
13

I don't see why it is inevitable.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 12:23 PM
2

I'm totally ok with gendered sports leagues. Women aren't the same as men, but should still be able to compete in athletic events. What I'm not ok with is public funding for either. That's just not the purpose of government. If your private club / league / school wants to pay for women's soccer, then go for it by all means.
/r/MensRights06/09/17 09:55 PM
6

That's part of it, but I think the larger part is simple political tribalism. The left sees criticism of Islam as bigotry. Feminists are left wing. They do what the left does. The end. Loyalty to left wing ideology / groupthink trumps any sort of application of feminist principle.
/r/MensRights26/08/17 03:05 PM
1

Just unhelpful in you're in a wheel chair. Or are 65. Or a woman. Or the attacker has a weapon. And you will likely get in legal trouble if you injure the poor thief.
/r/MensRights24/08/17 02:05 PM
7

Much worse. No freedom of speech, no right to self defense.
/r/MensRights24/08/17 02:52 AM
3

This is a big part of castle doctrine law in many US states. Breaking into an occupied house is proof of intent to harm. No need to bring sob stories to a jury.
/r/MensRights24/08/17 02:49 AM
5

I mean it may be a bad thing, but it just isn't bigotry. That isn't what the word means.
/r/MensRights19/08/17 01:49 AM
5

What forces are radicalizing the alt right No one. It's like .01% of the population, and they have no power. and promoting all this right libertarianism that is sprouting up? There is no libertarian-ism popping up in power. Zero nationally elected politicians are libertarian. We trade back and forth between big government Republicans and big government Democrats.
/r/MensRights18/08/17 06:11 PM
3

But we don't have anything like right libertarianism in place. We have a heavily managed and controlled welfare state.
/r/MensRights18/08/17 04:40 PM
12

We have more and more regulations every year, and we are running massive deficits to fund our welfare state, which consumes over half the federal budget. This is baseless fantasy.
/r/MensRights18/08/17 04:06 PM
2

Leftists absolutely do not advocate non hierarchical systems. They advocate incredibly controlling hierarchical systems while claiming that maybe some day, when we are all ready, that the state will wither away. That second bit is obvious fantasy, and the first bit is observable fact.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 01:21 AM
2

That's exactly the pattern of violating individual rights in the name of an alleged greater good that I did mention.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 01:20 AM
2

Authoritarianism is incompatible with the protection for individual rights demanded by the right. Authoritarianism must be some flavor of left wing. You can't protect rights so much that you become authoritarian.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 06:13 PM
14

I've never really done either. They're both just Republican mouthpieces, and I dislike Republicans almost as much as Democrats. Republicans occasionally talk a good game, but they follow the exact Left Wing plan I outlined above when they are in power.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 03:42 PM
24

The left is about violating individual rights in the name of an alleged greater good. That's simply what collectivism, government interference / planning of the economy, and entitlement programs are. The right is about protecting individual rights, particularly including property rights. Anyone that wants to deny women the right to vote must be a member of the left. It's simply incompatible with what right wing means. Many people have mistakenly gotten the impression the Republicans are right wi…
/r/MensRights09/08/17 03:04 PM
1

What about your mom catching you watching porn at 13?
/r/MensRights08/08/17 02:03 AM
15

Being a little rough or holding a girl down seem pretty vanilla to me. Flying off the top rope and putting her in a complicated knee lock would be a little weirder. Still not that weird compared to wearing diapers or something.
/r/MensRights01/08/17 07:31 PM
6

That really sounds pretty ordinary to me.
/r/MensRights01/08/17 04:50 PM
6

I think everyone knows that was an exception and not the norm. Race was a big factor too.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 08:21 PM
1

I'd rather be married to a girl that loved sex than one that put up with it a couple times a month.
/r/MensRights14/07/17 11:05 PM
1

No, she thinks we already live in a world with no false rape accusations, and so any failures to convict are a miscarriage of justice.
/r/MensRights17/05/17 10:27 PM
1

Education is too important to leave in the hands of a government monopoly.
/r/MensRights17/05/17 10:25 PM
9

And federally subsidized student loans should count.
/r/MensRights03/05/17 10:34 PM
4

...assuming equal productivity
/r/MensRights30/03/17 02:05 AM
16

I doubt they'll feel the need to make an excuse at all.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 06:57 PM
38

An entire team is nothing compared to the feminist goal. It won't even give anyone pause.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 05:56 PM
5

I think left wing identity politics is a pretty key motivator.
/r/MensRights03/01/17 04:21 PM
7

The Democratic Party has denial of constitutional rights as a pretty core part of their platform. They do this even in a total absence of statistics to suggest that their plans will help. Of course, there is a sizable overlap between feminism and the Democratic Party.
/r/MensRights03/01/17 04:19 PM
9

Well that and the authoritarianism and economic illiteracy.
/r/MensRights18/12/16 12:40 AM
16

Speech is speech, and unless it's a direct threat, it's not lawful to respond with violence.
/r/PussyPass17/12/16 04:33 PM
6

Don't forget the many "female owned" businesses that are really run by the husband so that he can get a boost on government contracts.
/r/MensRights09/12/16 03:25 AM
22

Sounds like attempted murder for most people.
/r/MensRights11/11/16 12:57 PM
-2

Highlighting the strength and evil of ISIS makes Clinton look weak.
/r/MensRights22/10/16 05:27 PM
18

If they are smaller and weaker, then a great many non-lethal options are removed from the tool bag. The use of force often looks like "talking to" and then it skips straight to "I feared for my life and had to shoot" A larger stronger man might be able to resolve things without shooting.
/r/MensRights30/09/16 01:49 AM
1

Tons of lonely guys would love it if a girl asked them out while they were studying. A decent fraction would be beside themselves with joy if they got woken up by a girl banging pots and pans in their bedroom at 2am to do it.
/r/MensRights21/08/16 07:08 PM
8

That describes quite a few. Environmentalists with their anti-nuclear nonsense, among many others. Democrats with their claim that high taxes and high regulation / central planning are great for the economy. Republicans claim to support small government...
/r/MensRights01/08/16 02:12 PM
8

Because when one group already has privelages that come at the expense of another group, protecting the rights of the second group means ending the privelages of the first. In this case, the feminists view their unjust privelages as rights.
/r/MensRights29/05/16 03:06 PM
1

It does if you vote based on those views.
/r/MensRights21/12/15 04:13 PM
-1

If you support the left, then you are supporting the people who did this.
/r/MensRights19/12/15 08:47 PM
4

The left already did that when they allied so closely with radical feminism.
/r/MensRights19/12/15 04:16 PM
2

Don't you hate pants?
/r/MensRights19/08/15 03:28 AM
0

Capitalism has murdered as many as socialism, with no citation provided? That's absurd. ballsy yes, but absurd.
/r/MensRights04/08/15 04:07 PM
1

Details?
/r/MensRights04/08/15 02:55 AM
2

Postmodernism for ladies...
/r/MensRights04/08/15 02:54 AM
1

Don't leave environmentalists out of the story.
/r/MensRights04/08/15 02:50 AM
3

Well a hundred million murdered, and millions more living in abject poverty isn't a great track record...
/r/MensRights04/08/15 02:11 AM
5

Well she did say it, she just didn't mean it.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 10:40 PM
9

No no, /u/ekjp promised that wouldn't be tolerated.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 09:09 PM
11

Are you claiming that feminists aren't an integral part of the Democratic base?
/r/MensRights07/07/15 11:17 PM
2

Although it is not fair it makes complete sense if you take into account that This is a baseless claim. There's no accountability of the custodial parent doesn't spend the money on the kid.
/r/MensRights19/06/15 12:37 AM
28

No matter how hard they hit the gym, only a handful of women would ever be able to pass the test. Instead of admitting that strength is a needed part of the job, and that men are stronger than women, they'd rather pretend it is arbitrary sexism.
/r/PussyPass04/05/15 04:55 PM
1

That's because feminism is an offshoot of Marxism. It only uses equal rights as a disguise.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 08:28 PM
7

you repeat yourself.
/r/PussyPass26/03/15 10:42 PM
30

Going to guess America, and that the reason was mostly "he'll look weird."
/r/MensRights18/03/15 02:27 AM
7

That's a way more rational position than "all male / female sex is rape." And several well respected and widely taught feminists hold that view, so this is a non-controversial walk in the park.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 02:25 AM
3

It's one of the highest paid jobs which only require a bachelor's degree in the US after all the benefits and early retirement plan are taken into account. On top of that, it's really a part time job. Around here, teachers work 180 days a year. Typical 9-5 jobs are 250 days a year. So, you get a decent paying job, with stellar benefits, and you get 70 extra vacation days a year compared to everyone else. It's not a bad gig at all, except for the being stuck in a soulless beuracratic meat grinder…
/r/MensRights16/03/15 04:59 AM
3

But it said it in the article! Journalists are never wrong!
/r/PussyPass14/03/15 01:36 PM
8

That doesn't mean it's true. Journalists are often poorly informed about gun laws. Stand your ground doesn't apply in the home. It is a law that removes a "duty to retreat" outside the home. For some reason "stand your ground" has become a buzzword for people that don't like guns, and so they try to link it to any questionable shooting in some sort of weird quest to paint it as a license to kill.
/r/PussyPass13/03/15 11:38 PM
5

Castle doctrine applies inside the house, where this case took place. Stnadards your ground applies outside the home, so long as you may legally be in the place where you are forced to defend yourself.
/r/PussyPass13/03/15 11:09 PM
1

It looks like it's been edited. The journalist likely didn't understand self defense vs stand your ground. Stand your ground is never relevant in the home.
/r/PussyPass13/03/15 08:07 PM
2

This has nothing to do with stand your ground. Only a handful of crazy left wing states ever had a duty to retreat in your own home, and even then it was rarely enforced meaningfully. This is a regular old self defense claim, whether it's bogus or not.
/r/PussyPass13/03/15 06:50 PM
-7

This has nothing to do with stand your ground. Only a handful of crazy left wing states ever had a duty to retreat in your own home, and even then it was rarely enforced meaningfully. This is a regular old self defense claim, whether it's bogus or not.
/r/PussyPass13/03/15 06:50 PM
2

Saying that it doesn't have to be a left / right issue is pretty hypothetical. Feminism is a pretty integrated field of Marxist class struggle theory.
/r/MensRights28/02/15 06:56 PM
2

It's because they're practically a wing of the Democratic Party. Who would expect anything else?
/r/MensRights28/02/15 05:10 PM
3

Sounds interesting. Have an article?
/r/MensRights26/02/15 03:18 AM
1

Thinking you are just is not at all the same as actually being just.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 11:43 PM
-3

Being just means treating people the way they deserve to be treated. Really treating people the way they deserve to be treated isn't an example of moderation.
/r/MensRights03/02/15 04:21 AM
-12

Extremism is only bad if it's an extreme of something bad in the first place. Being extremely just is no vice. Being extremely kind is no vice.
/r/MensRights03/02/15 12:42 AM
6

I think that it you look at the evidence, you will see that they can.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 01:02 AM
-5

Feminists are an integral and welcome part of the left's power base. You can't just ignore that and say it's about gender as opposed to politics.
/r/MensRights24/01/15 05:14 AM
3

It's clearly a feminist money grab. Sounds pretty left wing to me.
/r/MensRights24/01/15 01:39 AM
8

The draft killed bodily autonomy with the draft, and a whole host of things like the income tax, progressive taxation, and "family" courts killed financial autonomy ages ago.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 06:18 PM
3

While I 100% agree, very few universities are completely private. They virtually all get some level of state or federal funding. they all receive vast amount of government backed loans to pay for tuition.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 06:12 PM
1

The same thing constantly happens with gun rights.
/r/MensRights03/01/15 09:18 PM
11

While I absolutely think SheTaxi had the moral right to only hire women, I don't think they have a legal right. Just imagine a HeBrokerage, whose entire business model revolves around only having male stock brokers, so that "emotional and irrational" women aren't in charge of your money. It's clearly illegal discrimination.
/r/MensRights28/12/14 05:37 PM
2

It seems fairly well established that temperatures are generally rising since the end of the little ice age. Further, it seems likely to me that man is contributing to some percentage of that increase. However neither of those things are what environmentalists mean when they say "global warming" or "climate change". They mean that man is the driver, perhaps even the sole source of warming which will kill billions of people along with a mass extinction event. The evidence for this is very dubious…
/r/MensRights15/12/14 04:46 AM
-1

And catastrophic anthropogenic global warming, along with almost all other environmental causes.
/r/MensRights14/12/14 09:46 PM
1

No you don't have to commit a crime to get damages in civil court. Breach of a contract isn't a crime, but you'd better believe there can be damages.
/r/PussyPass04/12/14 10:58 PM
9

Did you ever notice that this is an absolute?
/r/PussyPass22/11/14 11:20 PM
7

republicans say they want those things, but once in office, they're nearly indistinguishable from democrats.
/r/PussyPass22/11/14 11:19 PM
2

democrats aren't automatically good just because Republicans are wrong and immoral.
/r/PussyPass22/11/14 11:17 PM
-8

Leftists seek victimhood status about far more than gender. Race and wealth immediately spring to mind.
/r/PussyPass22/11/14 08:11 PM
-16

Don't lump me in with the great majority of people in my group! The 90% of us just make the 10% look bad!
/r/PussyPass22/11/14 06:23 PM
1

It's not so much that they agree with the extremists, they often find the extremists very distasteful. The problem is that they can't argue with the extremists without exposing their own hypocrisy, and so they just stay quiet.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 03:09 PM
5

It goes a bit deeper than that. Moderates are very rarely able to overcome extremists in any movement, if they both truly hold the same principles. When you both follow a philisophy, or ideology, that A is good, it's impossible for the "moderates" to beat the "extremists" by saying "100% of A is too much, can't we just have 50% of A?" Doing so would expose them as lesser followers of the "A is good" philosophy. That's why "moderate" Muslims will never defeat "extremist" Muslims. They both follow…
/r/MensRights30/10/14 01:35 AM
1

Sure, that's the situation today. What if that situation changes though?
/r/MensRights16/10/14 10:06 PM
9

Do they want it with no double standards? Will they still want it if women have to kill? Will they still want it if women die?
/r/MensRights15/10/14 02:18 AM
9

Did you really think we want those laws observed?" said Dr. Ferris. "We want them to be broken. You'd better get it straight that it's not a bunch of boy scouts you're up against... We're after power and we mean it... There's no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws. Who w…
/r/MensRights01/10/14 12:01 AM
3

Details / source?
/r/MensRights30/09/14 12:44 AM
3

Brazil almost has that policy, and crime rates are huge. Gangs get 16 and 17 year olds to do their dirty work, and the teenagers get a slap on the wrist. Everyone loses.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 12:02 PM
4

You say "mental health place" like psychiatrists can wave a magic wand. Some people are broken and not fixable.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 12:00 PM
2

Private property, and freedom of association mean that you have the moral right to only cater to left handed midgets if you want. It also means that everyone else is free to shun you.
/r/MensRights20/09/14 02:34 AM
1

I guess post-modern art would be the best descriptor. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postmodern_art
/r/PussyPass18/09/14 03:03 AM
10

Just modern art
/r/PussyPass15/09/14 01:54 AM
2

I don't see how that would connect to them being mentally capable to consent to sex at a younger age.
/r/MensRights06/09/14 04:43 AM
4

I don't think similarity to an adult brain is synonymous to maturity. I see maturity, in the general sense, as making responsible adult decisions.
/r/MensRights06/09/14 01:08 AM
20

I'm not even sure how you could scientifically measure maturity.
/r/MensRights05/09/14 10:54 PM
-3

More than help the poor, Jesus is very plain that all rich people are evil (and remember this is rich by the standards of 2000 years ago) and that his followers must sell everything that they own, and become poor themselves.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 07:29 PM
10

The narrative fits right in with what Ayn Rand wrote. Those who can't try to use their incompetence as a weapon against those who can. Feminism is much like socialism, except that it paints women as being incapable of being responsible for themselves instead of the masses. It's like Christianity in that it tries to claim helplessness and victim hood as a badge of pride.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 05:26 PM
2

I think it means breaking a bottle over someone's head.
/r/MensRights16/08/14 02:42 AM
4

It's the MRA version of Atlas Shrugged. Those men holding up such a system are supporting their own destruction.
/r/MensRights16/08/14 01:01 AM
0

You've made the mistake of thinking that I like Republicans. I don't, they're even worse than Democrats. At least the Democrats are honest about wanting centralized control, and don't have any pretense about respecting individual rights. The reality is that both parties are almost identical in terms of beliefs, and fit almost identically on the left side of the political spectrum.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 07:19 PM
1

You seem to think that I like Republicans. I view them as at least as authoritarian as Democrats.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 07:17 PM
0

The idea that left libertarianism is a thing is silly. Do whatever you want unless it involves your money, your job, or your property, because we're going to force you to make the choices we like in those areas. Well, that controls the vast majority of a person's life and is thus quite authoritarian.
/r/MensRights03/08/14 01:16 AM
2

I find them indistinguishable from Democrats who like Jesus.
/r/MensRights03/08/14 12:12 AM
1

Statute of limitations was probably past for all the others.
/r/PussyPass02/08/14 06:17 PM
1

Liberal is the opposite of authoritarian? You must be joking.
/r/MensRights02/08/14 06:10 PM
7

While you may be a classical liberal, you aren't at all liberal in the modern context. In the US the term has been co-opted by the authoritarian left. The feminist movement is a key component of that alliance.
/r/MensRights02/08/14 06:05 PM
1

couldn't you say this about anything though? No. The NHRA really does promote drag racing and hot rods. The NRA really does promote gun ownership and gun rights. The UAW really does fight to get higher pay and more privileges for their workers. Feminists do not really fight for gender equality. unfortunately there are some outliers and extremists who are gonna go above and beyond the ideal goal that was originally feminism This isn't an accurate description. There are very very few self describe…
/r/MensRights26/07/14 08:30 PM
0

That's the definition they made up for themselves, but it's not an accurate description of what they do or what they stand for.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 07:29 PM
12

No, that's racist! Separate fountains for women, so they wouldn't have to have men leering in line behind them while the bend over to drink would be a good idea though.
/r/PussyPass19/07/14 07:28 PM
14

It's separate but equal! What's the problem?
/r/PussyPass19/07/14 06:29 PM
3

Not quite. We lose a portion to overhead in the process of doing nothing.
/r/MensRights08/07/14 12:36 PM
1

Everyone subsidizes everyone. That's not true at all.
/r/MensRights08/07/14 01:35 AM
5

So that it will be less obvious that men are being forced to subsidize women?
/r/MensRights08/07/14 01:07 AM
7

A reasonable persons fear of iminent grievous bodily harm or death should be the only time lethal self-defence should be used IMHO. I think Texas handles it better. Deadly force can be used to protect property under many circumstances, and also to stop violent felonies / arson.
/r/MensRights22/06/14 06:45 PM
1

Saying that the economic factors aren't enough means that you think men and women are so prejudiced against women that they're willing to turn away 10s of millions of dollars. Sure, some people really might be that biased. But everyone? Do feminists hate women that much?
/r/MensRights19/06/14 08:08 PM
7

They claim this all the time, but econ 101 easily disproves it. If women were just as valuable, or even better than men, but men refused to hire them due to prejudice, it would create a wonderful opening for non prejudiced men or women to wipe the floor with everyone else. You could pay them less money, since supply greatly exceeds demand, for the same job resulting in greater profits. Women control the majority of discretionary spending, and so you think they would flock to a company which didn…
/r/MensRights19/06/14 04:42 PM
2

I'd love to see the face of the radical feminist as he or she watches this and has all their dogmatic beliefs blown to shreds. That's not what would happen. Cognitive dissonance would kick in, and she'd wonder why these poor girls were being unjustly accused of crimes.
/r/MensRights17/05/14 06:41 AM
24

They'd never admit it was a lie then.
/r/PussyPass09/04/14 12:53 PM
1

Are they better at it? Or are they getting better deals?
/r/MensRights22/03/14 04:13 AM
0

Vehicular homicides are a pretty small subset though.
/r/MensRights07/02/14 11:10 PM
0

Since 93% of those murdered by blacks are black so for this to happen you need some serious racial bias. I don't see what you mean here. It's simply a factual matter that blacks are much more likely to be members of violent gangs or drug cartels that murder their rivals. We are all equal before the law and there should be no bias when it comes to the victim be they a bum on the street, a gang banger, or a pretty white girl. I don't really agree. Violent felons and drug dealers voluntarily take p…
/r/MensRights07/02/14 11:10 PM
4

Could part of the equation be that black males were far more likely to be criminals of some sort? No one feels as bad when a gang member or drug dealer gets killed in a turf war?
/r/MensRights07/02/14 11:54 AM
3

It's just echoes of communist (actually directed from Moscow communist) propaganda from decades past that today's left still clings to.
/r/MensRights15/12/13 08:56 PM
2

McCarthy was right. The government was riddled with hundreds of paid (and volunteer) Soviet agents.
/r/MensRights15/12/13 06:36 PM
1

I assumed this was /r/libertarian until I checked.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 04:28 AM
3

It sounds like you are saying that groups as a whole shouldn't be judged.
/r/MensRights10/11/13 04:04 AM
2

you shouldn't judge the movement as a whole. Why not? Should I refuse to judge the Khmer Rouge, because maybe a handful of Pol Pot's followers were decent people?
/r/MensRights10/11/13 03:34 AM
0

At the same time I can't cast judgement on the whole group. The group (or groups) exist, and must be judged accordingly. Whether or not their are good individuals inside such a group (and there certainly are) doesn't matter. The group acts, for good or ill, as a unit.
/r/MensRights10/11/13 01:53 AM
5

No, though I'm undecided on the question. Certainly there are individuals who call themselves feminists that are actually decent people who truly fight for equal rights for all. However, you said feminist groups, and I'm not sure there are any groups of honest, well intentioned feminists who truly fight for equal protection of rights. Also, sorry for the down votes, you asked a fair question.
/r/MensRights10/11/13 12:40 AM
13

Some groups of people are bad, and it's a serious failing not to judge them accordingly.
/r/MensRights09/11/13 10:47 PM
5

That's how it should work, but I don't see it happening that way in a family court.
/r/MensRights26/10/13 12:59 PM
7

I'm sure that would be found to be "not in the best interest of the child" and overridden.
/r/MensRights26/10/13 04:44 AM
2

I didn't mean to imply that at all. I'm saying that the government squanders vast sums of money, and throwing more at the problem won't improve things at all.
/r/MensRights21/10/13 01:35 AM
-1

The short answer stems from two things. They are a government monopoly not subject to the profit motive at all. This, they have no inventive to provide a quality service at a reasonable rate. In fact, the worse they are, the more fundin they get, and the bigger a beuracratic fiefdom is "needed." The second part is that they get sued over everything. Controlling unruly students results in lawsuits. Failing children who can hardly be bothered to show up, let alone study, results in lawsuits. And c…
/r/MensRights20/10/13 07:36 PM
4

Virtually all government run schools in the US are fantastically well funded. They get north of 10-12k per student per year of funding, and that excludes capital expenses.
/r/MensRights20/10/13 05:10 PM
3

That's one of many reasons to put people in jail. Others include deterrent, and to protect the rest of the population via isolation.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 12:06 AM
1

I take care of her from 7-4:30 5 days a week. I know what goes into it. Yes it's work, but I enjoy it just the same. You seem very bitter about your parenting experiences.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 03:06 PM
1

I have a little girl, and I love getting to stay home and play with her over the summer.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 02:06 PM
2

The Problem with 'Blacks Will Be Blacks' For months, every morning when my daughter was in preschool, I watched her construct an elaborate castle out of blocks, colorful plastic discs, bits of rope, ribbons and feathers, only to have the same little black child gleefully destroy it within seconds of its completion. No matter how many times the black child did it, his parents never swooped in BEFORE the morning’s live 3-D reenactment of “Invasion of AstroMonster.” This is what they’d say repeated…
/r/MensRights25/05/13 02:26 AM
-3

good food is really fairly cheap, but you have to cook it yourself. Cooking takes preparation and work, two things that the poor rarely excel at.
/r/MensRights24/05/13 03:09 AM
-1

Yes. Those theories depend on the mass violation of rights, and in practice lead to mass death.
/r/MensRights22/05/13 01:07 AM
1

If your standard is requiring both parties to explicitly say "I consent to having sex with you" before each session, then there is a lot of rape going on. Amusingly, both people are raping each other simultaneously under your standard.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 04:51 PM
3

Would the rapist even know it was rape in such a situation? If she doesn't object in any fashion, is he supposed to be a mind reader? Are we going to jail him for not correctly interpreting her inner mental workings?
/r/MensRights27/02/13 11:00 AM
0

Hence the modern democratic party. Not that the Republicans are any better.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 09:29 AM
1

Both should be entirely private contractual matters. It's none of the government's business.
/r/MensRights22/02/13 04:23 AM
1

Healthcare doesn't grow on trees. It is the product of human thought and human labor. You are saying she has the right to enslave others to provide for herself. There is no such thing as a right to enslave.
/r/MensRights22/02/13 04:22 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter