TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ScoutforHire Archive

View 0 posts and 7 comments by ScoutforHire on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

“Just a black person’s presence, exhibiting no outward sign of threat, is indeed threatening to a lot of white people.” The lynch mob would kill twenty people. Minimum.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 05:39 AM
1

Your reasons for giving the benefit of the doubt feel like lowkey sexism. That's why. "It's a woman, therefore there are a few extra reasons she could have that would make slapping him okay." Think about how that sounds for a second. I understand that your personal reasons for raising an objection here aren't sexist. But your argument is shared by a lot of people with sexist reasoning. Most people don't give the benefit of the doubt in scenarios like this unless a woman would benefit.
/r/MensRights24/05/19 01:52 AM
1

I'd support that theoretical decision too! I also find the people fantasizing about hurting the aggressor here to be disgusting! And at the same time, you are talking about giving a woman the benefit of the doubt in a case of recorded assault, for no real reason other than her being a woman. On a men's rights sub. Just because a woman could have a good reason to slap the guy doesn't mean she does. If this were two men, the speculation into the aggressor's possible motive would begin and end with…
/r/MensRights24/05/19 01:36 AM
1

Yeah, it is pretty disgusting to talk about massively disproportionate violence as a response to apparent unprovoked violence. But please, stop giving the aggressor the benefit of the doubt. Maybe you have purely altruistic reasons for it. I couldn't figure that out if I went back and read all of your post history, I'm no mind reader. But most people who make an argument like yours are doing it because they believe that women are innocent victims of the patriarchy, and therefore must have a good…
/r/MensRights24/05/19 01:24 AM
0

Physical retaliation? Eh, only if it persists. Retaliation to something that ended isn't self-defense, after all. Jail? Absolutely. Why would this not at least be something you take to court? It's random fucking assault caught on video.
/r/MensRights24/05/19 01:02 AM
10

Original post locked. Can’t have people saying women are in the wrong, after all!
/r/MensRights23/05/19 02:18 PM
7

The fact that you lost those opportunities is the problem. Accusations shouldn’t hold this kind of weight. The weight of accusations needs to be moved from the social world to the court- only once you were proven guilty or innocent should any details have escaped. Just like Kavanaugh.
/r/MensRights28/09/18 04:22 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter