TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Scrawlericious Archive

View 0 posts and 201 comments by Scrawlericious on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
24

The person you replied to is talking specifically about the women who lie. If nearly 10% of reports are false, a shitton of men are being wrongfully incarcerated. That is actually mind bogglingly bad. If anything you've shown me that we need to get more mad about this. It's not like sexual assault where men and women are both comparably abused. This is actually a huge difference that never happens the other way.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/02/25 05:06 AM
1

She's already earned less of a lesson from this than any guy, which evidences everything. I'd argue she's more likely to repeat the crime because she got off easier than most guys do. Edit: http://www.crimevictimsunited.org/measure11/sentencingcomparison.htm Here, she got almost the minimum sentence for dudes.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/03/22 09:16 PM
0

Is that the men's fault or the women who will do anything for money tho? There's no shortage of women who are willing.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/03/22 08:57 PM
2

Correlation isn't causation, but lighter and shorter sentences for prettier people is absolutely a proveable thing. They are literally spoiled. Call it anecdotal but spoiled people usually don't know how to do the right thing. They never had to learn because they've never been punished like the average.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/03/22 08:54 PM
1

Where'd you get that idea. I'm pointing out that women are exactly as likely to be violent and manipulative as men. Women getting away with magnitudes more crime than men is a whole other topic. Would you like sources of studies showing how rediculously common it is for women to get lesser sentences for the same crimes?
/r/PussyPassDenied09/02/22 06:06 AM
1

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2968709/ Just. As. Likely. Y’all just achieve less damage physically.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/02/22 05:47 PM
3

https://news.ufl.edu/archive/2006/07/women-more-likely-to-be-perpetrators-of-abuse-as-well-as-victims.html One more. Sorry. I'll read anything you send later. This also proves my point lmao. Even more evidence that women are more psychologically abusive. Imo that's no better than violence. Same exact aggression, just less physical agency, so they turn to their mental agency.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/01/22 10:32 AM
5

Eh I'm prepared to factor that in. Once you factor in the fact that men are literally more physically capable of violence when you look at those numbers the original guy posted. That's what's different. It's literally like pointing at sharks and saying they are more likely to eat people than dolphins or something. Like yeah. You make it sound like an excuse. And unless you could show that in families where the father spends more time with the kids it isn't reversed then it's anecdotal.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/01/22 10:29 AM
3

Literally already provided proof of the manipulation bit, courtesy of you lol. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00081/full#:~:text=In%20laboratory%20studies%2C%20women%20are,serious%20physical%20and%20psychological%20harm. Here's yet another showing that women are just as aggressive as men. "Provocation attenuates the difference" they found. But I look forward to it, maybe I'll learn something. I too have read dozens of articles on it though.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/01/22 10:27 AM
4

Hey if women are so nonviolent how come the majority of child abuse cases are a female perpetrator? The millisecond there isn't a physical disadvantage, women are just as likely to be pieces of shit as men. Stop blaming men. https://www.statista.com/statistics/418470/number-of-perpetrators-in-child-abuse-cases-in-the-us-by-sex/
/r/PussyPassDenied27/01/22 10:06 AM
5

I'm just coming in here to say that violence is subjective. And it's not only physical. Women are more likely to be mentally abusive, manipulative, all sorts of shit I can source. That's no better than physical violence. It's hurting people. You're hung up on the semantics of "violence". I'm just saying women are no different and if they weren't physically disadvantaged on average, they'd do the exact same thing guys do.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/01/22 10:03 AM
5

Women would if they could. Ergo, you're no better.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/01/22 10:00 AM
4

I never argued with the word violence like I said obviously guys are more likely to be physically violent. Women are less capable of physical violence. How about nonviolent agression? Let's stop moving the goalposts and let's only talk agression. Not violent agression, agression. You will find women are just as aggressive my friend.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/01/22 09:59 AM
2

So you got an article saying men are more likely to be manipulative than women? let's see it.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/01/22 09:56 AM
7

Yeah right. You don't know shit. Goodnight lmfao
/r/PussyPassDenied27/01/22 09:55 AM
9

Again, that's only because women are less capable of violence. At least men aren't more likely to be bad people and or manipulative. :)
/r/PussyPassDenied27/01/22 09:52 AM
10

Why not go learn something instead of linking articles you don't understand out of context. At least you linked a paper that references the mountain of evidence that proves women are more manipulative than men in it's bibliography. Agression indeed exists just as much in women, but they get their aggression out in different ways than violence. Women are just as vain, just as angry, just as likely to be hopelessly evil. I don't know if this article proves your point as much as you think. Edit: ht…
/r/PussyPassDenied27/01/22 09:47 AM
12

Snowflakeism. They can't fathom a scenario where it's the same for literally every other person as it is for them. Gotta be special in some way because everything is all about them.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/01/22 09:35 AM
1

Oh yeah idk what that was either this whole thread is kinda ewie. Sorry for name calling lmao
/r/PussyPassDenied18/01/22 12:23 AM
3

You chimed in on a comment thread literally about whether or not a girl can consent compared to a boy. That’s literally the parent comment. That is the only context we have to give to your comment.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/01/22 11:59 PM
2

You're fucking disgusting, sexist, and screwed up in the head if you think a 16 year old boy can consent while a 16 year old girl cannot.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/01/22 03:46 PM
4

Accusations or convictions or what? Where the heck are you getting your numbers. Everywhere seems to measure it differently but across multiple sources it seems more like 5-10% of reports are false. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_accusation_of_rape Like yeah it's shitty that 1 in 20 or more accusations are false. And as a dude it's pretty fucked up to see numbers as bad as 1 in 10. But that's nowhere near your number.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/01/22 05:41 AM
6

Google the difference... Surely you're trolling.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/01/22 05:36 AM
6

Not to mention there's a plethora of actually terrible women out there to supply women haters with evidence, it's not like it's uncommon for women to commit crimes in general. They don't even need to reach for this stretching of the truth lmao.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/11/21 12:18 PM
1

Envelopment is an interesting word haha. Kinda like it. I guess entrapment is taken.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/04/21 12:56 AM
6

Or being made to penetrate, imo. Edit: I think ISO below has a huge point. Even our language around it is biased.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/04/21 12:03 AM
10

True shit. I was more wanting to argue a change in the legal definition is long overdue.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/04/21 11:47 PM
4

Technical definition requires penetration of penis. It's an ancient definition. Only men are capable of legal rape.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/04/21 10:44 PM
2

Bahaha nah yeah sorry I'm sure it was somewhat mutual. I hope you guys both had fun. :)
/r/PussyPassDenied04/04/21 10:44 PM
2

Dude you were getting trolled so hard it's hilarious.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/04/21 10:32 PM
1

He said the sentence fits the crime in his opinion. So we have at least the court she was sentenced in agreeing with him. What does your individual perception of "the world" have to do with the court decision, or his point? XD actually I shouldn't even give it that much, what the hell are you talking about?
/r/PussyPassDenied04/04/21 10:31 PM
1

ohhhhhhhh ty ty for the explanation I was so lost
/r/PussyPassDenied27/03/21 10:26 AM
1

We all only take what we can get. None of us get our perfect model ideal human to love. Girl in OP can't get the tall guy this time. And it's because she sounds entitled. She's just assuming he's interested in her by virtue of being on the app. She also thought her Pass meant she could say that and not be judged for it. That's why it's in this sub. Edit: lol this is considering the screeshot is not a fake text anyway. I don't even know if it's real. XD
/r/PussyPassDenied21/03/21 02:56 AM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/pussypassdenied/comments/m933n5/you_nailed_it_umaseve/grlriuy Way to insult me and focus on one tiny thing I said instead of responding to the whole of what I was saying. Reaaaaally sells your point.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/03/21 02:41 AM
7

The girl in the op is a manipulative and evil person. You wouldn't go up to someone you loved and told them, "you're lucky you fit this criteria that you can't control or else I'd never have dated you." That's fucked up twisted manipulative behavior no matter who you are. She's trying to get him into the mental space of wondering if he's enough for her or not. When she's the one who came to him first! Anyone want a mom that will fuck up the mental health of any baby you have with her with gaslig…
/r/PussyPassDenied20/03/21 05:17 PM
3

She might also not realise that by virtue of being tall, he's probably out of her league. He already gets a big advantage . She's messaging him first after all, she came to him. That's why she's entitled. She doesn't realise he has better options. (If he didn't he wouldn't respond like that lol) You know you got me thinking, I don't see guys walking up to random women to let them know they aren't enough for their personal preferences. Not as often anyway, it's not socially acceptable, and not ev…
/r/PussyPassDenied20/03/21 04:51 PM
5

I wouldn't tell her that was the reason though, that's why the girl in the op was a dick, and those are the true colors she showed. Even if I did say crap like that, she wouldn't care, because being short isn't a disadvantage for women. weight however... Refusing a fat just means you don't want to date an addict, which for health reasons and your children's health reasons, is totally justifiable. Edit: the issue isn't her preferences, it's the fact that she thinks she gets to have requirements (…
/r/PussyPassDenied20/03/21 04:32 PM
8

Do you know a single guy who has broken up with a girl based off of her height? That's unheard of. Height is something we can't control. Weight is a choice after a point, however. And completely fair to judge someone on. It's like refusing to date anyone who smokes cigarettes. It's an addiction that destroys the body. Idk how you lumped those two together.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/03/21 04:24 PM
4

Exactly, but he already knew his worth before the convo. And she betrayed her lack of worth immediately.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/03/21 04:20 PM
2

That's reddit lol
/r/PussyPassDenied12/03/21 09:11 PM
39

Bless you. Now I get the enjoyment of re-reading it in a granny voice.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/03/21 09:07 PM
9

I feel ya
/r/PussyPassDenied05/03/21 09:09 AM
1

tbh this article makes women look really bad anyway. If they are using more of their brain at one time to test around the same on average. XD
/r/PussyPassDenied19/02/21 01:07 PM
0

Idk, from here it looks like he's just stating what the title is and what a title like that does. It is indeed a fact that the title demeans men. Everything else you're saying is drivel and kind of irrelevant to his response. XD he didn't say he doesn't like the article, he didn't say it was stupid, he just said it demeans men, which it does. Edit: I'll give a related opinion, the one who wrote this article is a sexist stick in the spokes for any movement benefitting women, or men. They are extr…
/r/PussyPassDenied19/02/21 09:53 AM
1

https://blog.vitalchek.com/vital-records/no-father-birth-certificate-mean/ Then nothing, normalness ensues. No stolen free money for the infidel lol. If the mom says she doesn't know, the dad can still come forward though which is cool.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/02/21 11:04 PM
1

The mother literally just needs a name and the courts will go after whoever it is.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/02/21 10:43 PM
2

1 in 100 to 1 in 30 is a huge leap. Still a lot more common than a lot of crimes.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/02/21 10:36 PM
6

Nope, that was to catch him with a notification in case he started searching for it. One doesn't get a notification for edits, and I wanted to pop up for him. And No? Why would I. Edit: I mean if you're curious what I found it's this, https://www.justice.gov/archives/opa/blog/updated-definition-rape Very much an all-woman decision to define rape the way we do now. It was updated to "be more inclusive" but still defines it only in terms of penetration. It doesn't account for coersion well. Edit2:…
/r/PussyPassDenied10/02/21 09:12 PM
7

Edit NVM I found it
/r/PussyPassDenied10/02/21 08:48 PM
6

Do you possibly have a source for why we have the definition we do in the us? I'm just interested.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/02/21 08:35 PM
4

I guess some people only feel like they are winning when others are losing.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/02/21 01:15 PM
1

Look I'm more pissed off at the NY Times. It's obvious all of these articles are just to cover up for this: www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-news/onlyfans-medic-lauren-kwei-new-york-post-interview-1104943/ Ever since then they've been on an onlyfans kick in their news cycle and every single article has been stupid. Honestly check them out just to see how bad they are when viewed in aggregate. :/ Actual onlyfans users probably hate the article writers.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/01/21 04:04 AM
1

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nytimes.com/2021/01/13/business/onlyfans-pandemic-users.amp.html "Struggling".... Really? The article is clearly pandering. It's saying "poor little her", which is disgusting. OF is a subscription service based on exposure. This article is saying the exact same thing as "instagram influencer can't live off of brand deals" or "YouTuber can't get enough new subscribers per month to make rent." It's like damn who cares.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/01/21 03:58 AM
2

No one isn't approving. The lady in the article is the only one "not approving" of anything. She's salty she can't make a living wage off of onlyfans. The people in the comments here are just asking, what did she expect? Edit: like I totally approve lol. I think guys and girls should both be able to make money off of sites like that wholeheartedly. When the article describes women who enjoy the option of being able to use onlyfans as "struggling" it's just obvious pandering, however. Edit2: I al…
/r/PussyPassDenied18/01/21 03:47 AM
1

I don't care how they act. It's fair to criticise. Just as it's fair for women to criticise men. No one is above criticism. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nytimes.com/2021/01/13/business/onlyfans-pandemic-users.amp.html All of the articles describe women as struggling with OF. As if the rest of the world isn't struggling without that option. It's entitled as all hell. It would piss me off twice as much if I was a woman. Edit: at the risk of quoting a questionable person, it doesn't require a p…
/r/PussyPassDenied18/01/21 03:45 AM
2

Sounds more like some girls are salty that they can’t be instant belle delphines overnight. Bahaha
/r/PussyPassDenied18/01/21 02:10 AM
1

If you’re implying we should all go work at McDonald’s I mean kinda yeah... that is what I’m implying. It pays way more than some app at entry-level, even if it’s shitty minimum wage. most people do onlyfans on the side until they get big. So most of the actually huge girls probably held down a real job or had someone else support their living situation for a long while. She’s the equivalent of someone no one has ever heard of making a new song, then getting mad when they aren’t topping the musi…
/r/PussyPassDenied18/01/21 02:08 AM
3

What does this even mean
/r/PussyPassDenied18/01/21 02:04 AM
2

Nah, just criticizing her complaining it’s not paying her more when she hasn’t put in the work to get big.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/01/21 02:03 AM
1

They are just jealous.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/01/21 11:31 PM
2

Thet are just mad that they don't get the easy option.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/01/21 11:29 PM
2

You're fooling yourself if you think it's difficult. Easy is easy.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/01/21 11:27 PM
2

I mean it's unjust that any average man would win a fistfight against any average woman. But that's biology. Same shit but reversed here broski. You can't be mad at women for their biological advantages. XD unless you want to sound like the equivalent of a radical feminist being angry that men are stronger on average.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/01/21 11:23 PM
1

No one said it's wrong to have an onlyfans, and no one said this lady in the OP was wrong for doing it. It's just the fact that she can't live off the money that it fits the sub. No one said the easy way is wrong, it's just entertaining when going the easy way doesn't work for people. She was wrong for expecting to live off the income. Most people do OnlyFans as a side project. She's just dumb. Has nothing to do with the intelligent women who use the app properly.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/01/21 11:20 PM
1

If history is anything to go off of, sociopathic businessmen will exploit the actual workers and scientists, just as they always have.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/01/21 11:17 PM
2

All of my family's social service workers were male. Is the actual bulk of the work female-dominated? Or just the jobs where you need to talk to a kid without scaring them. I'd wager the rest of their offices and facilities are still male dominated.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/01/21 11:13 PM
2

It's not real work for the same reason being a YouTuber isn't real work. You only make a living if you get lucky. It's like making it as a music star, it's not an aspiration or goal most people should expect is possible. Where's finding a job is. Edit: it's not a real job only in the same ways driving for Uber, or making youtube videos is barely a real job.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/01/21 11:03 PM
1

I believe the answer is somewhere in the middle. I think sex work a la onlyfans is just as real a job as youtube is. Or grubhub/uber. I believe it's on par with those types of jobs. Or becoming a music star. You will never make a shitton of money doing it unless you get lucky. For that reason, its not a real job. And I don't know if it can be, or even should. But it's still just as much a job as being a streamer or movie star. That is to say not a realistic aspiration for most people.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/01/21 11:01 PM
11

There have been a shitton of female astronauts from really early on in the space race from both of the relevant countries. The example your replying to is also not one of those cases. Edit: another one that really bothers me is articles praising billie eyelish without mentioning her brother writes all the music. There are tons of sick ass all female producers who are ACTUALLY cool examples of what a girl can do all by themselves. But saying the billie eyelish project is only a girl panders to cu…
/r/PussyPassDenied09/01/21 07:04 AM
3

I don't doubt it and my heart goes out. Those people are assholes. But the other guy is right, women are just as likely to contribute to a hostile work environment. These people are just assholes, but it's not because she's a woman and they are men. A bully is a bully. That's the main issue I see with extremist feminism, they seem to think if women ran the world it would be any different. We have seen time and time again with women CEOs and the like being just as evil. Assholes come in all forms…
/r/PussyPassDenied08/01/21 05:36 PM
3

It's extremely clear. I think your biases clouded judgement.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/09/20 03:35 AM
5

That's a gross generalization. And your example isn't very good because it doesn't matter how hard the hit is, the one who hits first is at fault. That's true regardless of sex.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/09/20 03:34 AM
0

It's a totally valid take. I'm sorry, I'm mostly just trying to play devil's advocate. I don't want to assume malice when it's more easily explained by something else and junk. I get bothered because I think a lot of the fighting and hate debate doesn't help gender issues, and you weren't even really doing that. So I'm sorry again.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/08/20 02:41 AM
8

I don't wanna be too much of a dick but I gotta also point out the "IL" already stands for "I learned". You wrote the equivalent of "UPS Service" or saying "fed ex express". The irony
/r/PussyPassDenied18/08/20 02:23 AM
-3

You might need to brush up on semantics and multiple interpretations of a text then. You can't just choose what other people are saying for them by ignoring what they meant by the words.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/08/20 02:20 AM
7

Are we reading the same thing? You're leaving off the other half of his sentence again. I mean, what kind of simple creature can spend literal hours in the company of male friends without saying a word, yet is complex enough to casually hide the fact that they're cheating by putting their phone down screen first? He's saying, specifically a person who spends hours in the company of friends all while keeping the phone down awkwardly is too much fussing about for the average dude. It could be said…
/r/PussyPassDenied18/08/20 01:41 AM
5

The other thing is he was speaking in the context of this post. The lady who took this picture is obviously self projecting something she would do. There's no reason at all to think the guy is hiding something unless you thought of hiding shit the same way (as evidenced in the comments by how many people here turn their phones to protect their screens). He's just saying to run far away from this obvious red flag of a woman specifically. Edit: that is to say, you're the one generalizing his last …
/r/PussyPassDenied18/08/20 12:49 AM
1

I loled
/r/PussyPassDenied18/08/20 12:47 AM
-1

Quite obviously a joke.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/08/20 12:46 AM
35

He didn't say men were more simple. He said what kind of man is so simple that he X, while simultaneously being complex enough to Y. I don't totally agree with him in the notion that women are more likely to go to those lengths to hide cheating, or the idea that men aren't clever enough to do it as well. So I see what you take issue with, but you're misquoting him and it doesn't get us anywhere. Edit: I super agree with him in that taking issue with someone turning their phone says a lot more ab…
/r/PussyPassDenied18/08/20 12:42 AM
12

Thank you.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/07/20 10:55 PM
6

I thought the issue was when people find you in real life and start coming to your house and shit. Everything else they can just choose not to look at.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/07/20 02:41 AM
36

My problem is it’s rarely the “low effort trolls” that ever become a real-world issue. That makes it next to useless to prevent actual harassment. It’s only useful as like a spam filter.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/07/20 12:29 AM
1

Because the woman doesn't get to pick the kids last name. The kid belongs to the father just as much as the mother. Mother could be a shitbag too. We have no idea. Even if both are decent enough people, the mom hating the dad for personal reasons doesn't give her any more right to who is also his child.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/06/20 12:18 AM
18

Nope. She can work for her own money. 1000 is plenty on top of what she'd make.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/06/20 04:23 AM
2

Maybe he hasn't heard of Leafly
/r/PussyPassDenied13/06/20 02:56 AM
1

I have a friend in Seattle who says their tax rate on weed is so high the prices are basically still street prices anywhere in the city.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/06/20 01:06 AM
1

Lol I was like, "source"??
/r/PussyPassDenied13/06/20 01:01 AM
3

Looks like he's speaking from personal experience bruv
/r/PussyPassDenied13/06/20 12:14 AM
3

It's most definitely common courtesy. The issue is pee-sitters are seeing it as a right. It's no longer a nice gesture, it's expected now. Some people don't consider it a courtesy anymore, and think they have some right to get up in arms about it. They are the ones being made fun of with this post. Cleaning off the damn counter so the next person could use that sink would also have been a courtesy. It's a well balanced joke... And has nothing to do with men getting defensive about the way they p…
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/20 06:01 AM
3

Totally depends on the person. I think he can like whoever he chooses to like. If that happens to be his one pet peeve... That's his choice yo. If you think that's a silly reason to break up with someone. Great for you! Live your life how you wish. But I don't think he was being extreme or hysterical. Joke or not. That feels just like calling someone racist for being attracted to one race more than others.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/20 05:56 AM
1

That is very much entitlement, especially when you describe it that way.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/20 05:51 AM
2

Why would anyone be "wounded" by someone who doesn't know what they're talking about?
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/20 05:49 AM
10

It doesn't matter what types of tools or products are there. They need to put that shit away so that others may use the sink too. It's selfish.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/20 05:41 AM
5

Dammit
/r/PussyPassDenied14/05/20 03:51 AM
1

Would you be ok with men-only gyms?
/r/PussyPassDenied14/05/20 03:44 AM
1

Most definitely.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/05/20 03:43 AM
2

Idk if women's places have more styles. It might be close. You're forgetting beard/moustache care and all facial hair. ;p
/r/PussyPassDenied14/05/20 03:41 AM
2

I shouldn't have thrown twoX in there... It's a bit more serious there. And mature. Lol. I find it a better look into more sane women's issue arguments...
/r/PussyPassDenied10/04/20 04:05 AM
2

Awh I think you're awesome too
/r/PussyPassDenied10/04/20 12:26 AM
1

You guys are both the boobs, OP says "results". That's number of images, disregarding the number of boobs present entirely.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/04/20 12:16 AM
1

You guys are both the boobs, OP says "results". That's number of images, disregarding the number of boobs present entirely.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/04/20 12:16 AM
1

Oh man that was a classic. Some of them feel fake; it's so mind boggling how they don't hear themselves.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/04/20 12:12 AM
3

Stupid male thought the dishes would get done by themselves, dickpass denied!
/r/PussyPassDenied10/04/20 12:10 AM
1

Lol what would that look like? I'm almost curious. With the stereotypes in place... Would it be like a bunch of "mansplainers" getting told off? That would be ironic. Or a "manspreading" police post where a girl goes around in public and makes fun of guys sitting with their legs apart? Or like a meme about a man next to a full dirty kitchen sink all sad because he thought his wife or someone would come along and do the dishes? The more I think about it the more sexist I feel. It doesn't feel lik…
/r/PussyPassDenied10/04/20 12:08 AM
2

That's literally their point. You agree with who you're replying to. They are saying they don't feel it's fair to get banned from there just because of a few posts on here. This subreddit isn't inherently or remotely about hating women. Just when people try to use a pussypass. OP is pointing out how r/FDS is perfectly demonstrating itself as an echo chamber.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/04/20 12:04 AM
1

Lol what would that look like? I'm almost curious. With the stereotypes in place... Would it be like a bunch of "mansplainers" getting told off? That would be ironic. Or a "manspreading" police post where a girl goes around in public and makes fun of guys sitting with their legs apart? Or like a meme about a man next to a full dirty kitchen sink all sad because he thought his wife or someone would come along and do the dishes? The more I think about it the more sexist I feel. It doesn't feel lik…
/r/PussyPassDenied10/04/20 12:01 AM
2

I totally feel you. It's the same reason I get on r/twoX or r/niceguys. It's just funny to see someone be an idiot... Maybe it's the same draw as public news networks. It's fun to get angry at someone for what feels like a justified reason. I try not to take r/niceguys as a critique of all men... I don't see a reason for it.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/04/20 11:54 PM
0

Lol I got it
/r/PussyPassDenied09/04/20 11:32 PM
2

Girls can be dickhead enigeneers too. That's not the "dickhead engineer's" fault. No one is getting mad at your facts. But it's not some patriarchy's fault a woman didn't choose that job. Edit: There are male teachers who take the same dock in pay to work in a very underpaid industry. You're an idiot. This is a problem with which jobs get compensated fairly and has little to do with sex. I agree, teachers should be paid more. But that is NOT because most of them are women. It's a problem with th…
/r/PussyPassDenied09/04/20 11:09 PM
3

How the heck is that comparable at all? Plus when you didn't have to pay slaves, tons of people had them. It's not even a correct assumption.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/04/20 11:02 PM
2

Wholly agree.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/20 06:38 AM
1

If only you parsed the words you're using....
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/20 01:30 AM
1

What the heck dude? Just from the fact that we have the term biological parents means there is a distinction.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/20 01:28 AM
0

"Can we discuss the contradiction?"
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/20 01:27 AM
-1

But there are differences.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/20 01:25 AM
7

Women are always paid the same for the same work, it would be illegal otherwise. It's not men's fault those women chose a lower paying job.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/20 01:20 AM
25

Don't wait for an accident. If they drink and drive at all it's time to cut off. :/ In my opinion.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/09/19 04:38 AM
11

Every girl is...
/r/MensRights21/10/18 06:49 PM
1

We're talking about the bad feminists. Because that was a massive double standard.
/r/MensRights21/10/18 06:02 PM
0

Girls who go with men they aren't 100% sure aren't gonna try drugging them are just stupid girls though.
/r/MensRights15/02/18 05:56 AM
1

One definition is literally "an organism that lives in or on another organism and derives nutrients from them". It's semantics because there are multiple definitions. It's not like every single human being on earth agrees that a parasite must be a different species than its host.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 08:49 AM
1

Google "parasite"
/r/MensRights12/02/18 08:47 AM
0

Semantics yo
/r/MensRights12/02/18 06:26 AM
1

Exactly! That's why I've already said this is only a semantic arguement.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 05:24 AM
1

It's literally a semantic arguement.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 05:23 AM
1

Only for rape cases. I'm talking a couple that both legally agreed to being a parent. In today's system if you're a guy you have no say in your child's life merely because the girl houses them.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 03:08 PM
0

tbh I was a bit out of it when I typed that. This is why I prefer r/mensrights to r/redpill. I'm sorry if I'm part of the problem.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 01:15 PM
6

Not enough rights for men.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 11:49 AM
1

It depends on how you interpret the word. There is no "right" or "truth" here. "parasite" means different shit to everyone. You just pulled a separate definition from the dictionary definition. It really doesn't matter though. Take what you want or leave it. Babies are pretty much parasites. Nothing more. E: "pretty much" is a subjective term.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 11:40 AM
0

It's fucking semantics bro
/r/MensRights11/02/18 11:36 AM
6

There's some logic to it.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 11:29 AM
0

Yeah I was mistaken as I've said in my other comments. It was only proposed as a law.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 11:09 AM
-1

Just Google sweden male abortion and you'll get a ton of news on what happened.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 11:04 AM
2

Sorry I was mistaken, it was only proposed as a law. Just Google it lol
/r/MensRights11/02/18 11:04 AM
9

Oooooop fuck you're probably right.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 10:59 AM
-4

https://www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/news/worldviews/wp/2016/03/08/men-should-have-the-right-to-abort-responsibility-for-an-unborn-child-swedish-political-group-says/ Why don't you look up shit first?
/r/MensRights11/02/18 10:58 AM
1

isopod hour again
/r/MensRights11/02/18 10:57 AM
2

I'm not sure what you think he was saying but idk if you got it right.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 10:55 AM
2

I think there should..
/r/MensRights11/02/18 10:52 AM
1

What about everyome else?
/r/MensRights11/02/18 10:49 AM
1

No, the burden should fall on the bitch who didn't want to abort. We need a law that absolves men from any interaction with the chick or her kid if she's the only one who wants a baby when they get impregnated. This is how Sweden does it.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 10:48 AM
-6

That's the law in Sweden
/r/MensRights11/02/18 10:46 AM
11

The awesome thing that Sweden has done that the us should is allow men to "abort" any relation to a child that only the mom wants.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 10:46 AM
3

Hahahahahaha you're so wrong and twisted it's funny.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 10:45 AM
1

You are correct that the embryo is of the same species... you're wrong about everything else. XD
/r/MensRights11/02/18 10:43 AM
5

for the duration of the pregnancy a baby is the very definition of a parasite. So what? Why you hating on parasites.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 10:41 AM
5

Speak for yourself...
/r/MensRights11/02/18 10:36 AM
7

Thank you
/r/MensRights11/02/18 10:36 AM
3

Definitely. But regardless of probability, that given the option they would might make some people uncomfortable.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/10/17 09:25 PM
0

But the people in question were both in a relationship. This is about how he took the thing she said. We really don't know. She shouldn't be confused and seeking help online though she should be figuring out that shit by talking with him.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/10/17 08:16 PM
1

hahaha... I think so
/r/PussyPassDenied19/10/17 08:14 PM
3

yeah but the boy in question only said he'd fuck the girls friend, that doesn't mean at all that there's a possibility of that occuring.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/10/17 08:14 PM
0

if he responded that way then he didn't realise it was a joke, so she failed to deliver said comedy. She shouldn't be confused and online about it. She should be talking to him and working it out.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/10/17 08:12 PM
2

Wtf
/r/PussyPassDenied19/10/17 08:11 PM
1

elsewhere in the thread I tried to point out the difference between saying, "he's hot" and "I'd let him fuck me." Obviously no one here knows exactly what was said. I'm mostly just annoyed at the girl for being unable to talk with the dude about it.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/10/17 03:38 PM
0

And that's all good. :3
/r/PussyPassDenied19/10/17 03:19 PM
3

of course. It's just odd that she's confused at his response. They haven't talked about this themselves.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/10/17 02:52 PM
1

he should run. Who plays off real feelings like a joke in a dedicated relationship. That's just more miscommunication.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/10/17 02:41 PM
1

Sarah, Brad Pitt, doesn't matter. The point is he needs to be with someone who won't leave him for an actor. She needs to be with someone who isn't bothered by those comments. He was merely illustrating how he felt. If you'd fuck anyone other than the one you promised you would only, then it doesn't matter how plausible the situation is, the guys defensiveness is excusable. I understand it's supposed to be fantasy. But it's even furthermore rediculous that she turned to social media in confusion…
/r/PussyPassDenied19/10/17 01:48 PM
1

I'm not trying to threaten your opinion. I think there's a big difference in telling your SO that you find an actor attractive and that you'd fuck them. We don't know how the conversation went down. if the girl said, "I'd fuck Brad Pitt" and the guy said, "well I find your friend pretty darn attractive." It would have a totally different meaning.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/10/17 01:38 PM
1

totally feel you... I just feel like she could have brought this up with him.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/10/17 01:09 PM
1

It doesn't matter. No matter how hot an actress is I would never fuck them given the chance because I am monogamous. This is a preference thing.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/10/17 01:09 PM
4

She should have told him, not the internet. they are both begging to be with someone else.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/10/17 01:06 PM
2

I think the guys comment as a "lash out" pales in comparison to the girl's social media post.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/10/17 12:59 PM
2

lol I ain't sensitive. All I keep saying is they should break up. If she thinks her comment should be innocuous, then they shouldn't be together. Obviously he was upset by what she said. We also don't know how she said it. I just think obviously both people should go find others who agree with their perspective, and/or go find people that don't make them want to go cry on social media about personal relationship problems.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/10/17 12:58 PM
1

It's all semantics. We don't know how the girl said it to him. I think it's shallow that she's trying to work out relationship problems online though.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/10/17 12:56 PM
3

Anything along the lines of, "I would fuck them if I got the chance," is a deal breaker for me. Idfc what your preferences are. I'm just saying it's extremely easy to excuse the guy's behavior when the girl implied she might fuck a celebrity. It does not fucking matter how unlikely it is.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/10/17 12:39 PM
6

The guy in question doesnt know that. For her to go to social media with her "problem" when her problem is just that her boyfriend got uncomfortable with her comment and lashed out is retarded. My thoughts are that both of them need to communicate more and seeing the girl turn to social media instead of talking with the dude about it means it's the girls fault for me personally. She doesn't want a solution she wants attention and sympathy. If she does want a solution then she's going about it al…
/r/PussyPassDenied19/10/17 12:37 PM
1

Since when was wanting to see titties on a screen the same as planning to leave your SO in the unlikely event of an actor wanting you...?
/r/PussyPassDenied19/10/17 11:20 AM
2

Saying that if you got the chance to fuck an actor that you would is a disregard for your SO's feelings. He should go be with someone else.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/10/17 11:13 AM
1

Also newsflash, you can find someone hot without wanting to cheat on your SO with them. Me and my gf are more comfortable this way. No it's not cheating thoughts to imagine sex with another. But it is to decide you would if you got the chance.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/10/17 11:09 AM
3

Damn you I'm hungry
/r/PussyPassDenied19/10/17 11:01 AM
1

And a lot of people don't do the celebrity hall pass. I wasn't saying that at all. My point was she cannot blame him for him getting defensive. If she can then they need other people pronto. She didn't say she found the actor hot, she said I'd fuck him. That is a no-go for some people. I understand many other people see it as harmless fun.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/10/17 11:00 AM
0

She can't handle that her friend gets him rock hard? This is all opinion... You can have as open a relationship as you want but you can't get mad at the dude in the OP for being uncomfortable with her comment. Everyone is different. Just means they both belong with people they agree with.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/10/17 10:26 AM
1

Nope, there's no difference. This is an opinion.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/10/17 10:25 AM
2

Wanting to watch porn is really very different than the celebrity vs friend cheating scenario. One is cheating.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/10/17 10:24 AM
1

It does not matter how likely it is to happen, that's a poor excuse. The guy was uncomfortable and showed the girl why he was uncomfortable. It doesn't matter how unlikely the cheating is, thinking about cheating is thinking about cheating.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/10/17 10:23 AM
1

Nope dude. Actor or not, thoughts of cheating are thoughts of cheating. She needs to get with a guy who agrees with her definition.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/10/17 10:22 AM
1

That's an opinion.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/10/17 10:20 AM
1

Maybe he girl should have thought about how her words would affect him.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/10/17 10:20 AM
2

then they shouldn't be together. He wasn't comfortable with the comment. If she doesn't get that she needs a guy she does get.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/10/17 10:19 AM
1

It depends on how she said it. Cheating is cheating and thoughts of cheating no matter how impossible are still cheating thoughts.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/10/17 10:17 AM
6

This is the problem with this post.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/10/17 10:16 AM
0

That depends on how you like your open relationships.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/10/17 10:16 AM
31

I feel you but cheating is cheating.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/10/17 10:09 AM
2

If she's upset it is actually her fault.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/10/17 10:02 AM
7

Cheating is cheating.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/10/17 10:01 AM
2

Nope, cheating is cheating.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/10/17 10:00 AM
1

I don't think that was a good arguement of the ladies, idk if it matters how he wrote it, he did.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/10/17 09:11 AM
1

Ouch
/r/MensRights15/09/17 11:47 AM
2

Gotchya, thanks
/r/MensRights15/09/17 11:31 AM
1

Yur dumb
/r/MensRights15/09/17 11:30 AM
5

dumb
/r/MensRights15/09/17 11:30 AM
3

Biased how?
/r/MensRights15/09/17 11:24 AM
1

....lol ok dude
/r/MensRights22/08/17 09:58 AM
1

Ok
/r/PussyPassDenied25/07/17 01:25 PM
1

This doesn't sound good on a rape thread
/r/PussyPassDenied25/07/17 01:13 PM
1

XD
/r/PussyPassDenied25/07/17 12:57 PM
1

Geez you're an idiot. Imma preemptively block.
/r/MensRights09/04/17 12:44 PM
10

http://www.jimhopper.com/pdfs/holmes_&_slap_1998.pdf
/r/MensRights09/04/17 12:38 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter