TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ScreendeadGames Archive

View 9 posts and 339 comments by ScreendeadGames on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
48

Did we just watch the same video? She doesn't look a day out of rehab.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/12/20 06:23 AM
6

Oh god don't start that fucking debate again
/r/AntiFeminists07/12/20 03:40 PM
13

why are oranges orange
/r/AntiFeminists07/12/20 01:57 PM
48

One of the comments: "Noooooo!!! You can't hate men!! Are you actually saying you hate the group of people statistically and socially responsible for raping and murdering and shitting on you??? Nooo you can't do that!!!!!!!" Fixed: "Noooooo!!! You can't hate black people!! Are you actually saying you hate the group of people statistically and socially responsible for raping and murdering and shitting on you??? Nooo you can't do that!!!!!!!" These people are garbage.
/r/AntiFeminists21/10/20 09:13 PM
2

Man that gave me the chuckle I needed today
/r/AntiFeminists21/10/20 06:29 PM
-3

Ah yes I forgot the sub I was in for a second.
/r/AntiFeminists03/08/20 09:54 AM
3

But the important part is: don't try to pass the shit test. A person who shit-tests you is a bullet best dodged.
/r/AntiFeminists03/08/20 09:46 AM
6

This is all correct, except it absolutely is the case that men and blacks commit more crimes and it's pretty much futile to try to argue that point, especially if you're interested in using statistics productively. That doesn't mean there isn't discrimination (there very likely is), but they absolutely do commit more crimes.
/r/MensRights01/08/20 08:15 PM
34

ah yes, i, too, am a mysonginist
/r/AntiFeminists24/07/20 12:55 PM
2

Ya this don't fit chief
/r/AntiFeminists20/07/20 02:23 AM
3

You misspelt single motherhood
/r/MensRights07/07/20 08:14 AM
2

Ah yes, because less lethal and less-than-lethal ALWAYS work, and there's ALWAYS the right conditions to use them.
/r/MensRights07/07/20 08:11 AM
1

Agree
/r/PussyPass04/07/20 07:58 AM
2

See this thread
/r/MensRights03/07/20 01:29 PM
9

You're right, I overlooked the most final of the potential consequences. And all-too-common, which is the worst part. Some women don't appreciate the power they have over men, both legally and socially, and I hear too many fucking stories like yours because of it. I think in many ways personal responsibility is going to be the 21st century's defining struggle like civil rights were in the 20th.
/r/MensRights03/07/20 12:54 PM
14

The repercussions of a false accusation continue to affect the accused even when the accuser comes clean. There's always the suspicion. Not to mention any jobs/scholarships/relationships they lost will probably stay lost. For this reason, just coming clean isn't enough; she needs consequences.
/r/MensRights03/07/20 12:00 PM
2

This is false. It is NOT legal. The issue is that it's only called sexual assault when a woman does it, not that it's legal. This kind of misinformation will only lead to people taking this cause less seriously than it deserves.
/r/PussyPass03/07/20 09:50 AM
3

"As you may remember" As if anyone gives the slightest fuck
/r/PussyPass28/06/20 11:43 PM
1

I bet she felt really oppressed.
/r/MensRights27/06/20 02:35 PM
1

Men invented the phone. Men oppress women by colluding to pay them less. Therefore men use phone bills as a way of disproportionately impoverishing women. I like this game.
/r/MensRights27/06/20 02:33 PM
1

I like how that's point 4. "Not really important but I guess the list wouldn't be complete without it, tack it on the end there and hope nobody reads that far."
/r/MensRights04/06/20 05:45 PM
1

Eliminating the gender sentencing gap would help more black people than eliminating the racial sentencing gap.
/r/MensRights03/06/20 07:40 AM
3

women are trash
/r/PussyPass25/05/20 11:30 PM
1

r/titlegore
/r/PussyPass25/05/20 11:30 PM
-2

That doesn't mean we get to abandon our own principles and advocate censorship too.
/r/MensRights24/05/20 11:07 PM
-35

I miss back when this sub actually highlighted human rights disparities. Now we're complaining about a has-been saying the same shit she's always said? On Twitter? And calling for censorship? What the fuck happened.
/r/MensRights24/05/20 12:14 PM
-1

As is your cropping...
/r/MensRights24/05/20 12:07 PM
4

I somehow doubt such a tiny anomaly would make up any appreciable amount, considering the number of suicides in the source is in the 10s of thousands for each sex, and there are...so few intersex people, and even fewer who commit suicide.
/r/MensRights22/05/20 05:57 PM
6

If men make up more than 3x the number of suicides that women do, then the percentage must be > 75%. If it's 1 part female, 3.56 parts male, then the percentage is 78.1%. And if it's 3.56x MORE, that means the ratio is 1:4.56, which is 82% male. Almost 70% implies it's actually under 70...so who's making up the difference?
/r/MensRights22/05/20 05:19 PM
2

Being a Brit, I very much do see it as a term of endearment. However, you just seem to be a salty bitch.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/20 09:05 AM
7

Then they aren't the hottest women on earth, are they? Like, by definition? In much the same way as buying a wig and fake beard wouldn't make me the best haired man in the world either.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/20 09:01 AM
2

The fuck is your problem?
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/20 08:56 AM
7

Healthier? Literally, how?
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/20 08:51 AM
3

This is false. A woman can be given the same maximum sentence a male rapist would be given, however it would be under sexual assault law, not rape. Sexual assault holds the same maximum sentence as rape: life in prison. What is actually at issue is: The female rapist is not subjected to the social shunning that results from being branded a rapist The crime is seen as less severe because it falls under a lesser category, despite being just as severe and damaging In practice, the maximum sentence …
/r/PussyPassDenied20/05/20 01:07 AM
2

Can't even be mad about that
/r/PussyPass19/05/20 02:14 PM
0

You're making yourself look ridiculous. What exactly is your contention with my comments? Do you even disagree? Are you just being an obnoxious prick for the fun of it?
/r/PussyPass19/05/20 01:59 PM
0

It is impossible to change sex. Even the radical lefty ideologues mostly agree with that. Not sure what planet you hail from, but it ain't here.
/r/PussyPass19/05/20 01:28 PM
2

r/itsafetish r/detrans Along with those issue-specific subs (who, by the way, both have a feminist bent - I'm not a feminist but generally the subs are tolerable since they're very single-issue), most conservative subs also side heavily on the 'it's not real' position.
/r/PussyPass19/05/20 11:16 AM
2

Speak your truth. If opposition voices die out, everyone will assume it's a settled issue. Better to die on your feet 'n' all that.
/r/PussyPass19/05/20 11:02 AM
2

coughs Ya cough niv I realised I misread your previous comment. You said there is. Presumably this means you buy into the transgender thing?
/r/PussyPass19/05/20 10:57 AM
2

There it is? Like I was hiding it? It's a mental illness, plain and simple. Any dysmorphic condition which leads you to remove part of your body and have surgery to replace it with something else is an illness. That doesn't make you a woman.
/r/PussyPass19/05/20 10:52 AM
2

I'm being flippant. No such thing as a man with a vagina.
/r/PussyPass19/05/20 10:45 AM
-1

I don't know what you mean
/r/PussyPass19/05/20 10:33 AM
2

Actually, it's hebephilia, and it's not gender-specific.
/r/PussyPass19/05/20 02:00 AM
5

"BREAKING: Publication blames woman for husband's paedophilia." Imagine.
/r/PussyPass19/05/20 01:58 AM
1

... what about them?
/r/PussyPass19/05/20 01:57 AM
1

Huh, well in that case I think we're on the same page. Maybe I didn't read your original comment right.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/05/20 10:42 PM
1

Now you sound like you're agreeing with me. For clarity, you're saying "I personally wouldn't use gratuitous force, but I believe many people do"?
/r/PussyPassDenied17/05/20 10:31 PM
1

It's not about what the other person is doing. That's not what's at issue. That happened, no matter what you decide to do about it. You're setting up a red herring to distract from your obvious little faux-pas there. If you believe you need to do something in order for them to stop, then you believe that thing is necessary. Those two sentiments are entirely synonymous. If you don't understand that, you're beyond help.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/05/20 10:25 PM
0

You haven't actually countered any of my argument. You're just restating your position over and over again. You are not a good-faith interlocutor. Conversation over.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/05/20 10:23 PM
1

That's exactly the problem with saying 'men are stronger than women'. It's both true and not true, because it's so ambiguous. You could interpret it in the same way as "5 metres is longer than 4 metres" -- something which is ALWAYS the case, no matter what. That would be interpreting it as "ALL men are stronger than ALL women" You could also interpret it as MOST men. Crucially though, the statement is missing the necessary information to make that distinction. So you can't really argue or reason…
/r/PussyPassDenied17/05/20 10:22 PM
1

That last paragraph makes zero sense, and shows how little thought you've put into this. If you have to go beyond what's necessary... What's another word for having to do something? ...Necessity. If you have to do it, then it IS necessary. Do you just not understand words?
/r/PussyPassDenied17/05/20 10:15 PM
-1

I disagree. From a completely practical point of view, more-broken bodies are less useful and more burdensome than less-broken bodies. The minimal amount of violence necessary is ideally the maximum amount you should enact to rectify a violent situation. Usually, that amount is 0. Sometimes it isn't. Any more than that minimum is gratuitous, and serves no purpose. Reality is always messy though, and idealism is just idealism, so the general rule of thumb is: if the other person has stopped being…
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/20 11:21 PM
2

Men aren't stronger than women. MOST men are stronger than MOST women. That doesn't mean NO man is weaker than ANY woman. There are plenty of strong/well-trained women out there, and plenty of feeble, weak men out there. Your argument is automatically incorrect right there, conversation over. But further, even if someone's physically weaker than you, they can still become enough of a pest that they can no longer be restrained without violence. If a weak person punches a strong person once, and w…
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/20 11:08 PM
5

r/ApostropheGore
/r/PussyPassDenied14/05/20 11:22 AM
6

Actually she's denying that they CAN, not denying that they CAN'T. Double negatives are bad form.
/r/PussyPass06/05/20 08:58 AM
1

They hate everyone, just in different ways. It's a misanthropic ideology, not only specifically misogynistic or misandrous.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/05/20 06:17 AM
1

It's funny when they try to say not all feminists are cunts by trying to claim the suffragettes as the 'first' feminists. Like, for one, NO they were not. But for another, they were literal domestic terrorists. Domestic terrorists who operated during a time of war. Domestic terrorists who operated during a time of war and not only got everything they wanted, but somehow sidestepped the ordinary punishments for domestic terrorists during a time of war and have been touted as great people ever sin…
/r/PussyPassDenied04/05/20 06:12 AM
2

I guess you don't get it. That's on you, bud.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/05/20 03:38 AM
1

r/YourJokeButWorse, kinda.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/05/20 03:31 AM
5

Red pill. It's a metaphor from the Matrix where the red pill reveals the true world to the person who takes it. A pill. Keep this in mind. Kool aid. It's a reference to the Jonestown massacre where 900 people drunk cyanide-laced 'kool-aid' and died. A liquid. See where I'm going with this? Red pill kool-aid. You only need one to effectively communicate your whine. You used both together which doesn't make sense at all. If you don't get it, I guess it's on you, bud.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/05/20 03:27 AM
11

red pill cool aid You got your thought-termimating clichés all jumbled up there, bud
/r/PussyPassDenied02/05/20 03:20 AM
116

Ah yes, because "this is my dad" really means "I own this man." I don't have a whole lot of possession over my boss. Nonsense. This is a catastrophic and deliberate misunderstanding of the English language. Find a real problem.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/04/20 08:44 PM
1

What happened around March, friend? Your Reddit submission count quadrupled, it's a pretty startling spike in the graph there bud. Did you lose your job? For someone accusing others of missing their playmates, you sure do have a lot of time to spew mindless drivel here. You're sort-of self aware, which is refreshing! It was kind of amusing reading you talk to the void in that AskReddit thread, lamenting that nobody bothers to read the disappointing lukewarm custard deposits you probably call com…
/r/PussyPass26/04/20 07:36 PM
1

Clearly you've misunderstood me. Do you find that happens a lot? It might not be a problem with everyone else, you know. I don't feel the need to barricade myself away from scary, dissenting opinions. The block function remains unused on my account. I was taking about you. This is clearly causing you some kind of psychological harm, so in your own self-interests, it must be better to echochamber yourself, no?
/r/PussyPass26/04/20 07:04 PM
1

The block button is always available and completely free to use if you would like to stop hearing opinions that personally hurt you. I'm under no obligation to stop speaking, though. It sucks, right? Are you lifeboating from r/incel? The amount of bitterness and refusal to engage is characteristic of those types. Funny, you accuse me of brigading. Maybe go back to talking about pools and stuff, you're definitely better at that than you are at engaging with contentious subjects.
/r/PussyPass26/04/20 07:00 PM
2

Nobody is brigading, sorry to shatter your obvious victim complex. I'm a regular user of this sub and a full-throated supporter of justice where it is actually necessary for male and female perpetrators. You might be the most misguided person I've ever seen here -- I'm not sure you're really accomplishing anything other than getting out some kind of frustration you have with the world? It's not really the place. Nice pun. Gimme another!
/r/PussyPass26/04/20 06:52 PM
3

From the perspective of a third party with no dog in this fight, there was absolutely no argumentative behaviour in this conversation -- other than from you. You're entirely unwilling to explain why you disagree. It doesn't matter whether the commenter is male or female. Their position stands or falls based on its own merits, not the personal characteristics of the person saying it. You took a hard veer off track on this one.
/r/PussyPass26/04/20 06:45 PM
1

Your actions are your own, temper or no temper. You may be jaded but it's unfair to try to preemptively jade others because you experienced something awful. I'd guess what it does is make you feel like you're getting back at 'women' or something, but the collateral would be unhappy men who desire a relationship but are too afraid to develop one. God knows I understand where you're coming from, but this isn't healthy for anyone involved, my man. Out of interest, how do you plan to improve?
/r/PussyPass22/04/20 07:37 PM
7

Someone who is secure in his manhood probably doesn't have to put other men down in order to affirm it. Just saying.
/r/PussyPass22/04/20 07:28 PM
1

Thank you for your surrender.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/04/20 07:11 PM
1

Ah, moving the goalposts. Classic bad-faith argumentation. Thank you for signalling that I don't have to put anywhere near as much effort into this as you just did. I said rich men probably get away with rape more than poor men?? This is false. A lie. It's not true. You said: Rich men get away with rape more often than poor men, ditto for rich women getting away with shit Please point out the "probably" there. If you can't find it, what that means is that you fundamentally changed the nature of …
/r/PussyPassDenied22/04/20 07:10 PM
1

How can we possibly know how many men get away with rape? If there's no conviction, it may as well be a complete unknown data point whether the story is true or false. Where is the line drawn? 90% true? 75? 99? On what grounds? It's impossible to reason (without being intellectually dishonest - yes, even if you're citing sources) about a statistic that cannot logically be known.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/04/20 04:53 PM
1

4 sentences, 4 exclamation marks. My pet peeve.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/01/20 03:23 AM
1

"Perhaps" it should be. Only perhaps?
/r/MensRights25/07/19 05:12 PM
1

I think you're confusing "facts" (things which must be backed up with data) with "things that happened" (things which only seem to be backed up by your words). You can be struck by lightning a thousand times in your life, but that doesn't make it a fact that it's common for people to be struck by lightning. Lots of people would have to share the experience. If you've got data on this, then let's discuss that, but I'm afraid I can't just take your word on faith, especially when the claim doesn't …
/r/MensRights24/07/19 02:15 PM
0

Yes, I agree, the poster is victim blaming. I think you might've misunderstood my position on this.
/r/MensRights24/07/19 01:51 PM
0

That's all entirely laudable, but it doesn't really follow that you'd see people saying others' marriages will fail, to their faces, often enough that it's not just a one-off. this is my observation based on nothing but facts. Lol no, mate. Even if it's true, your observation is based on nothing but experience. By definition. Watch the hubris.
/r/MensRights24/07/19 01:48 PM
1

OH My bad, dude. Since you replied to a comment of mine, I assumed you were saying I was being fallacious. You're right, lol
/r/MensRights24/07/19 01:44 PM
1

I... Don't think I've called anything the cause of anything else. Unless you can give a specific, unambiguous quote?
/r/MensRights24/07/19 01:42 PM
1

You know you can't just call something a fallacy, without actually explaining why it is one, right? Go ahead.
/r/MensRights24/07/19 01:38 PM
1

I don't know where you live that talking about marriage in pubic leads to people saying this kind of thing, but okay. The fact that they are right that we need to be discerning doesn't erase the disgusting way they said it. Essentially "you're not a real man because your wife fucked you over." That's hardly an example of good-faith advice-giving, but maybe you're just better at giving the benefit of the doubt than I am.
/r/MensRights24/07/19 09:19 AM
14

Telling a random dude their marriage will fail is obviously a dick move, but what this guy said in response (to the imaginary people in his head who actually do that) is orders of magnitude worse.
/r/MensRights24/07/19 07:01 AM
2

Girl-sacking
/r/MensRights20/07/19 06:04 PM
3

Fembagging
/r/MensRights20/07/19 05:38 PM
2

Fine, I'll replace Crusading with kid-fucking.
/r/MensRights17/07/19 09:54 PM
25

I think the dictionary is amazing. When I look up an ideology in the dictionary, it gives me a totally comprehensive analysis of everything I'll ever need to know about the ideology. Christianity really is only a religion based on the teachings of Jesus Christ -- never mind about the whole Crusading kid-fucking business, hush-hush. Nazism really is only the political principles of the National Socialist German Workers' Party -- never mind about the whole Jew-gassing business, hush-hush. Feminism…
/r/MensRights17/07/19 07:56 PM
22

it's also a joke. there is no vagina.
/r/MensRights17/07/19 02:51 PM
13

Vaginas are designed to make babies out of semen That's the uterus's job
/r/MensRights03/07/19 12:07 PM
5

It's a true misanthrope - we've found one in the wild! What a sight...
/r/MensRights29/06/19 08:32 PM
1

All I see when I read this is "women are incapable of performing to men's standards, so WE THE MORALLY PURE will give them the same shit anyway"
/r/MensRights29/06/19 08:17 PM
9

it hurts so it should only be done if the girl wants it It doesn't matter if it hurts. It should still only be done if the girl wants it. The pain isn't really the biggest issue with circumcision, since pain is temporary even if it is unpleasant. The permanent, irreversible desensitisation would be my personal biggest problem with it.
/r/MensRights28/06/19 10:53 AM
5

Oh you used full-stops instead of commas. Might want to fix that; it makes it a very confusing read.
/r/MensRights28/06/19 10:49 AM
0

This is not true
/r/MensRights27/06/19 02:11 PM
8

You don't have to sign your comments.
/r/MensRights27/06/19 01:53 PM
11

If you want to figure out who the pigs in a society are, look no further than the people you aren't allowed to call pigs.
/r/MensRights27/06/19 01:52 PM
1

Should I have added a /s?
/r/MensRights26/06/19 06:19 PM
2

facing the optimum of prejudice and stereotype GAMES RISE UP! On a serious note, I'm actually surprised that a company made this move. I hope it's not a PR nightmare, but you can never trust the outrage mob.
/r/MensRights26/06/19 12:20 AM
6

Let's be honest, it was only a matter of time. It fucking sucks that it's come to this, but this is the kind of thing which needs to be burned into the society's collective memory so it never happens again.
/r/MensRights26/06/19 12:14 AM
1

But... But that doesn't fulfill my Robin Hood gender-war fantasy! What are you, a misogynist?!
/r/MensRights26/06/19 12:12 AM
6

It's men's fault that adult women are scared of the dark. Got it.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 01:21 PM
10

Are you dumb? MEN CAN'T EXPERIENCE INEQUALITY /s
/r/MensRights23/06/19 01:54 PM
1

It's difficult to break down something so basic, since it's pretty much as simple as it can be made. I'll try. Scolding only works under one of two conditions, and sometimes both: You respect the person scolding you You are anticipating potential physical violence from the person scolding you The first case obviously doesn't apply here, since you're not very likely to respect a mob of people who seek to "scold" you for your opinions. It may work if you were pulled up on them by one or two people…
/r/PussyPassDenied11/04/19 08:37 PM
0

Good to know you're able to recite Jordan Peterson, but again, this evidences my point and shits all over yours.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/04/19 07:57 PM
1

I guess so? There's more than a little bit of overlap though. And a scolding IRL generally doesn't do much unless there's a threat of violence, so...
/r/PussyPassDenied11/04/19 07:56 PM
1

Liiuuuuuiooooooooodssssssseeeeeeeeerreerrrrrrrr
/r/PussyPassDenied11/04/19 06:43 PM
-1

Looossseeeeeerrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
/r/PussyPassDenied11/04/19 06:40 PM
-1

Don't be a sore loser now.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/04/19 06:38 PM
-1

Sounds like what a loser in denial would say. I'll take it. Thanks for the +1.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/04/19 06:32 PM
-1

Imagine thinking being retarded wasn't an undesirable thing. How retarded. Imagine being unable to navigate the simplicity of blockquoting and simultaneously pretending not to be retarded. Disorder, not illness. Regardless, this is irrelevant to the point, because it was a device you used to derail away from owning up to your godawful fallacious argument I pointed out. I was "fixated" on the only thing you said because it was the only argument you had made, at that point. You can't expect someon…
/r/PussyPassDenied11/04/19 06:22 PM
2

Well, if there is, doesn't that fuck up your point about it not being about physical violence? You've tied yourself into a knot here.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/04/19 06:03 PM
2

Unless there's some underlying threat of violence which is communicated via tone/body language, why would a physically-present disagreement be any different to a remote one, provided the ideas are discussed in the same way?
/r/PussyPassDenied11/04/19 06:00 PM
2

What's the difference between that, and online interaction, if all that's exchanged are words?
/r/PussyPassDenied11/04/19 05:53 PM
-2

Must've hit a nerve Says you? Being a bigot Citation needed. Owed some sort of reverence You're incredibly pissy about having been corrected. Nothing to do with the post Everything to do with it. Literally was precisely what the post was about. "You just THINK an appeal to the crowd is a bad argument! It's actually a really good one!!!" Massive, massive idiot. Holy shit. "My fallacious argument was just an example!!!" But it's still a fallacy. "You're just taking it literally!!!" Well, you did l…
/r/PussyPassDenied11/04/19 05:52 PM
-2

Autistic? Listen, retard, I told you I don't agree with him. Don't get pissy when you're shown to be just as stupid as the person you're ragging on. Nothing about what I said was "literal". You made a blatantly fallacious and obviously useless argument, and I called it out. Get the fuck out of here if you think you're owed some kind of reverence just because you disagree with someone everyone else also disagrees with. You're both idiots. I'm starting to think you're even worse.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/04/19 05:36 PM
-1

Polls only tell you what people think is true, not what is actually true. As I said in my previous comment, this is a shit line of enquiry. There are plenty of other ways to discredit this person's opinion without having to resort to fallacious reasoning.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/04/19 05:26 PM
0

Argumentum ad Populum: a fallacious argument that concludes that a proposition must be true because many or most people believe it, often concisely encapsulated as: "If many believe so, it is so." I'm not saying he's right. I'm just saying this is a really, really shit way to prove him wrong.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/04/19 05:25 PM
1

Don't forget about the "ever victim of rape/sexual assault is a woman" schtick, too
/r/PussyPassDenied11/04/19 05:17 PM
2

u/tmone This. The claim to a word's inapplicability needs much more evidence than the claim to a word's applicability. English is a very metaphorical language, so most words can be used in a metaphorical context and be perfectly well-understood. Some people are just purists.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/04/19 05:16 PM
2

Call me crazy, but I don't think there should be physical repercussions for sharing an opinion, however incorrect the opinion may be.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/04/19 05:14 PM
4

I think it was used loosely rather than strictly, to communicate the idea that she was entirely self-interested and self-serving, and sees nothing outside of the bubble of things which Personally Affect Her™. This is an acceptable use of the word solipsist.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/04/19 05:12 PM
235

In short, Men should reverse the worldwide principle of supply and demand for me so I can feel like what I do is more valuable.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/04/19 06:35 PM
28

"I paid a stranger to chop my son's genitals up, but he chopped the wrong part! This is totally so much worse than what I wanted"
/r/MensRights07/04/19 02:52 PM
2

Sure I guess? Seems strange to go for "call for a different kind of violence" over "don't call for violence" as a first response, though.
/r/MensRights04/04/19 07:16 PM
28

or maybe let's not call for any of that at all
/r/MensRights04/04/19 07:04 PM
3

Hey, can we create a trend where "stressed" men go out and bash womens' brains out and leave their dying bodies in dumpsters? Maybe it'll teach them to control their emotions! Tooootally mentally sound thought process. /s obviously
/r/MensRights04/04/19 07:03 PM
1

Does it count as savage if you're mostly wrong? I thought savage was more descriptive of harsh truth. Perhaps you overestimate the impact you really have, judging by the 3-year post history and only 86 karma. s a v a g e
/r/MensRights03/04/19 07:15 AM
1

Your post history is interesting.
/r/MensRights03/04/19 06:55 AM
1

I mean, everyone's a product of their upbringing. It's difficult to blame someone for having baggage. Most people don't know how to face their problems. But it's also not my responsibility to set myself on fire to keep others warm, if you know what I mean.
/r/MensRights03/04/19 06:46 AM
1

It's not about finding someone with their problems already dealt with. Nobody's like that. It's about finding someone who deals with their shit in a healthy way. Needless to say, I didn't pursue this person.
/r/MensRights03/04/19 05:43 AM
65

Gambling Best of intentions Maybe she deserves a break; she's clearly a fucking moron.
/r/PussyPass31/03/19 02:25 PM
1

You can't answer for yourself because you now realise you didn't think through the things you said. That's been comprehensively demonstrated. Have a great day.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/03/19 12:43 AM
1

aren't Don't give a shit about aren't. I asked should. What I would do is, again, a complete non-sequitur. Totally inconsequential. I'm not the person saying he'd do something here. You're wriggling.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/03/19 12:25 AM
1

Other crimes are irrelevant to the principle. This is tu quoque. The concept pretty simple -- if you believe false accusations are actually worse than murder, then you must also think one of the following, either: • False accusations should be punished more harshly than murder, or • Worse crimes shouldn't necessarily be punished more harshly It's conceivably possible to recover, at least in part, from a false allegation. Yes, it's pretty much impossible to recover fully. Yes, it's difficult to r…
/r/PussyPassDenied29/03/19 11:26 PM
8

Your proposition: Woman moves the seat: never Man moves the seat: if seat is up and he needs to shit & if seat is down and he needs to piss What about if the person who needs to move the seat, moves it? Woman moves the seat: if the seat is up and she needs to piss/shit Man moves the seat: if seat is up and he needs to shit & if seat is down and he needs to piss The latter is the more equitable arrangement. Given that the number of seat-movements is necessarily equal (or greater for your suggesti…
/r/PussyPassDenied29/03/19 11:14 PM
1

False accusations punished more harshly than murder. That's what this whole thread was about, and that's the logical conclusion of your statement that false accusations are more damaging than murder. Worse crime = worse punishment, right? I sure hope you don't magically forget that principle for the sake of wriggling out of this knot.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/03/19 10:50 PM
1

Nah. We have degrees of criminality for a reason. What else would have to change if your idea was implemented? Slander/libel punishable by decades in prison? Normally I'm on the same page as the people in this sub but this is just fucking retarded.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/03/19 10:09 PM
2

Hey everyone! This monster said he hates women and want/s to hit them. Go get him!
/r/PussyPass25/03/19 10:30 AM
3

£8000 in "moral damages" This kid probably has permanent health issues now. £8000.
/r/MensRights20/03/19 09:14 AM
2

Make no mistake: these women are incels.
/r/PussyPass15/03/19 08:26 PM
25

When I read this, I feel like I'm reading the memoirs of a very very ill person. She speaks like a borderline. No accountability. Not only is it the child's fault for making her feel that way (rather than being responsible for her own emotions and how she deals with them), she's also very obviously found the niche of outrage-bait news and man-hating, and is using it as an excuse to never have to be accountable for her own part in fucking her life up to the point she sees fit to punch a 12-year-o…
/r/PussyPass15/03/19 08:23 PM
7

Tom Hardy: that's bait
/r/PussyPassDenied15/03/19 08:13 PM
120

Wonder how much of his money she'll still be able to steal with the threat of state violence.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/03/19 08:11 PM
1

Please explain why everyone should be a something-ist. And they say they're not totalitarian.
/r/MensRights15/03/19 05:51 PM
45

Not to mention the fact that, if we're taking her worldview to its logical ends, "traditional masculinity is a female ideal" is equally true, because women make it clear they want men to be conscientious, stoic, and strong. Then again, it's probably a stretch to imply her worldview has any logical ends whatsoever.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/03/19 02:46 AM
5

Or maybe we shouldn't hold the happiness of the household ransom against our own lack of emotional maturity...
/r/MensRights09/03/19 11:11 AM
49

All feminists have left to complain about is that rich women make less money than rich men. Never mind the fact that poor men are far worse off than poor women. Never mind that pesky thing we call "normal" (where men are generally worse off than or equal to women). No, the problem is that the richest woman in the world can only buy 27,059 Bugatti Veyrons, whereas the richest man can buy 76,765! MISOGYNY!!!
/r/MensRights04/03/19 12:35 AM
4

Have a feeling you'll find this interesting, even if you don't agree.
/r/PussyPass28/02/19 12:03 PM
1

Fuck off back to r/incel.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/02/19 11:19 PM
5

Nice to know where your priories lie.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/02/19 07:42 PM
2

"Having main characters is sexist, but only when they're not women."
/r/PussyPassDenied21/02/19 01:06 PM
4

There is no "before". Women have been more precious for the last 10,000 years and counting. Men have been expendable for at least as long. It makes sense, behaviourally, but it's not fair.
/r/MensRights19/02/19 01:39 PM
3

Tell her about literally any example where men have it categorically worse than women, listen to her cry sexism, and use her response against her.
/r/MensRights13/02/19 05:39 PM
2

Interesting thread
/r/MensRights07/02/19 09:42 PM
2

It's funny how companies totally reverse their position on freedom the second they get to the top... Almost like they're trying to close the door behind them.
/r/MensRights07/02/19 09:40 PM
4

Lol what the fuck
/r/MensRights03/02/19 08:55 AM
3

He isn't owed shit for his own poor planning and decision making.
/r/MensRights03/02/19 08:18 AM
2

Maybe not, that's fair. Sometimes people come here from other subs though
/r/MensRights02/02/19 01:07 PM
8

Both of you get an r/ihavesex
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/19 01:02 PM
20

It doesn't even make sense. Why would men feel shame for erectile dysfunction or small penis size if they genuinely thought sex was something they receive, rather than give?
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/19 01:02 PM
3

Feminists: better 10 innocent men are punished than 1 guilty man goes free. Authoritarians: better 10 innocent men are punished than 1 guilty man goes free.
/r/MensRights02/02/19 01:00 PM
1

/s FTFY
/r/MensRights02/02/19 12:58 PM
6

Not to mention the fact that, in jails and prisons around the world, if your inmates find out your charges have anything to do with women or children (don't you think it's strange how those two are always grouped together?), you'll get your head caved in. Convict justice doesn't give a shit about false accusations. This woman endangered his life, and cost him over half a million dollars in the process. She's a danger to society.
/r/MensRights02/02/19 12:56 PM
6

One I talked to didn't really hate men, when we got down to it -- she was reflexively taking her own family problems out on them and rationalising it with the Marxist lens of power dynamics. When I say 'family problems', read daddy issues.
/r/MensRights01/02/19 07:48 PM
32

Where's the disguise?
/r/MensRights01/02/19 02:43 PM
2

Sounds about right, yeah.
/r/MensRights31/01/19 06:31 PM
20

implying a degree in gender studies is worth something
/r/MensRights31/01/19 06:28 PM
3

The date itself is the courting ritual; if it's not a genuine date, it's not a courting ritual. Paying for the meal is just a part of it, meant to signal to the woman that the man is capable of providing for her.
/r/MensRights31/01/19 06:24 PM
6

TL;DR: It's not likely enough to worry about, and it happens to men at a similar rate.
/r/MensRights31/01/19 06:22 PM
3

It's not my responsibility to pay women for their neuroticism. How is that even relevant? What an absurd thing for her to say.
/r/MensRights31/01/19 06:19 PM
2

That's a sentiment I can get behind.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/01/19 10:10 AM
2

I didn't say it was on the judge.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/01/19 10:08 AM
3

Not sure what your point is. All I'm saying is that it's too long of a sentence.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/01/19 10:06 AM
3

Just as in she was guilty, sure. But not the length. IMO.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/01/19 10:02 AM
28

"They're a necessity!"
/r/PussyPassDenied30/01/19 04:38 PM
372

Working class mother 5 kids in "thousand dollar" private school Pick one.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/01/19 02:15 PM
10

I don't believe this sentence was just, from the information available, but it's very fit for this sub nonetheless.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/01/19 12:54 PM
1

It's exhausting trying to convince someone their eyes are wrong. We both ought to stop doing it. You'll get nowhere trying it with me, and obviously you're too stubborn and entrenched to read anything without putting your little spin on it. This convo might've gone a lot better if you were productive enough to dismiss unimportant perceived mishaps.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/01/19 05:20 AM
1

You can double down on your misunderstanding for eternity, all the while screaming that I'm dishonest and the cause of all of your problems, but it won't resurrect this conversation. You took advantage of my good faith, and it has thus lapsed. It's over. Move on.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/01/19 05:05 AM
1

Don't bite me just because you're out of your depth.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/01/19 05:01 AM
1

Cor mate this is mental. It's over, dude. You're not going to brow beat me into saying that I'm not seeing the thing I'm currently witnessing. Nah. We're done here.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/01/19 04:56 AM
1

Why do you keep bringing it up? Reread the comments where it first came up.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/01/19 04:33 AM
1

I'm going to have to call it in. Sorry. You seem to be out of your depth, and we're just going round in circles. You seem confused because I've actually conceded a point to you; so confused that you're under the impression that I'm saying you made the point, which, supposedly, is why I would be saying it was a bad one. I'm not. I made the point, and I'm saying it was a bad point for me to make. Multiple times, I have said I concede this point. I've already given a response to it: I UNDERSTAND TH…
/r/PussyPassDenied30/01/19 04:23 AM
0

No, you fucking retard, it's a straightforward way of saying it's an injustice, and men are the affected group, so it's an issue with their rights.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/01/19 04:06 AM
1

This isn't your 4th time doing anything. You misunderstood what I said. At the risk of sounding like a broken "no u" record, YOU correctly accused ME of saying the emotions should be a factor, which was something, on reflection, I did not mean and could've replaced with something more sensible. I CONCEDED THAT POINT TO YOU. I'm at a loss for words at your baffling reply, honestly. If you don't want to continue (fatigue is understandable; I'm feeling it too at this point), we can end the conversa…
/r/PussyPassDenied29/01/19 09:05 PM
7

Human rights movements are usually kinda liberal, lol.
/r/MensRights29/01/19 08:21 PM
9

This debate will never end because both sides rely on axioms to reason their case. Don't bother.
/r/MensRights29/01/19 08:20 PM
1

I'll take the paragraphs in reverse order. I don't think one necessarily has to be malicious to do something immoral. I'm arguing honestly, and I'm certainly not lazy, so there must be a third option you overlooked. That phrase is actually the phrase I was mainly responding to. If "not getting away with it" = suffering without necessity, then that is a sadistic expectation. Punishment which serves no purpose is immoral. If it can be shown that a certain amount of punishment will create a deterre…
/r/PussyPassDenied29/01/19 07:42 PM
1

You might benefit from reading the extensive replies to my comment, in which your concerns have been discussed at length.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/01/19 07:10 PM
0

There is certainly an essentially indisputable case for reform, you're right.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/01/19 06:31 PM
1

If closure requires making someone suffer, then it is sadistic. If the criminal is in a position where going after people is a likely enough circumstance to make it worthy of genuine fear, they are clearly not in a state of mind where it would be responsible to release them. This ought to be accounted for. I have said this before. I said it almost seemed like you assumed bad intentions, which, I have to say, does seem close to the truth. I'd like to hear an explanation which contradicts this, th…
/r/PussyPassDenied29/01/19 06:16 PM
1

You know someone can be wrong without being a liar, right? It's almost like you assume bad intentions. Your point is correct, although the suffering is not caused by the perceived lack of punishment; the suffering is caused by the immoral desire of the family to see another person suffer not being fulfilled. Remember I'm talking entirely idealistically here, and that a certain degree of pragmatism will be required IRL. Your second point is half-answered by my reply to the first, although more ou…
/r/PussyPassDenied29/01/19 05:27 PM
1

I'm the one who said the total suffering should not be added to, in an ideal world. The suffering of the family will occur no matter what happens to the perpetrator, and it will vary in intensity due to the subjective and individual nature of familial relationships, and thus it's not a reliable or sensible way to gauge truth, or to gauge the appropriate sentence length for the minimal amount of suffering and maximal amount of rehabilitation potential and example-making potential. Could you elabo…
/r/PussyPassDenied29/01/19 04:42 PM
-1

The majority of convictions, as far as anyone can tell, are of the correct people. Disparity in sentence length is a men's rights issue and a very notable problem. I don't dispute that. It tarnishes the system as a whole. However, convictions on the whole are just, and sentences are, on the whole, served by people who ought to be serving them.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/01/19 04:35 PM
1

Did you completely disregard the second half of the comment?
/r/PussyPassDenied29/01/19 04:22 PM
1

This just isn't backed up by statistics. It contains an overwhelmingly large amount of justice, but it also contains an unfortunately large amount of injustice.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/01/19 04:13 PM
0

I absolutely agree. This is one of those times I mentioned where pragmatism is necessary. It certainly has to be balanced. Honestly, I feel that the family and friends of a victim should have no say whatsoever in the punishment of the perpetrator, as the amount of pain they might feel is essentially irrelevant since it's so variable and subjective.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/01/19 04:11 PM
1

That may be true, but that doesn't make it moral to enact personal revenge or avengement. The issue I take with either entity (public or private) taking revenge is precisely what I said in my original reply: an eye for an eye is immoral and only serves to increase the total suffering in the world. I certainly see your point, don't get me wrong. I understand that people who have been grievously wronged aren't in the business of meticulous moral philosophy, and that the justice system is the solut…
/r/PussyPassDenied29/01/19 12:44 PM
0

Sending someone to jail is the revenge. I believe revenge, even state-sanctioned and popular revenge, to be immoral. All it does is increase the net suffering in the world. That's a subjective opinion which I hold as an axiom and which you're entirely welcome to disagree with. Being an axiom, there's not really an argument I can make for or against it; it's just something I base my morals on. I'm not sure what your last paragraph means, sorry. I agree with all of your points there except 4. Thos…
/r/PussyPassDenied29/01/19 12:04 PM
1

Being this un-self-aware.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/01/19 10:53 AM
1

If that's what you'd like to believe, then you're welcome to it. That's not what I said, however. Well done though, you won the argument in your head.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/01/19 10:43 AM
-2

You just shot your own point down. I'm not saying it's all rosy, but it sure as shit isn't failing anytime soon. It's holding up.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/01/19 09:47 AM
1

To be fair, in my original comment I said that it was "holding up", to refute the original claim that it wasn't. You changed the point of contention to whether the system is effective. I think it's more effective than not, with some notable caveats (which you and I would likely agree on and I could riff all day about).
/r/PussyPassDenied29/01/19 07:36 AM
0

I mean, it's pretty subjective in this context. Overall though, since the majority of dangerous people appear to be incarcerated or otherwise dealt with, I'll have to continue to disagree.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/01/19 07:17 AM
21

The entire justice system is an eye for an eye, and it seems to be holding up just fine. It's just government-endorsed revenge.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/01/19 04:46 AM
0

That's so unimaginably sad. I hope you get well soon.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/01/19 05:01 PM
0

Holy fuck dude get a hobby. This conversation has been over for 4 days.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/01/19 04:50 PM
2

Fucking hell I agree so hard. It's such a ridiculous attitude and they're always totally oblivious to it.
/r/MensRights27/01/19 02:29 PM
2

So-so. She could have embellished or made up the story, and since we haven't got a name for the kid, or any other information about the incident at all really, I wouldn't be willing to just accept it. I do think she did it though, don't get me wrong.
/r/MensRights27/01/19 02:28 PM
9

r/pussypass
/r/MensRights27/01/19 11:12 AM
5

13, as the story goes. There's just as much evidence for it as there is for cloud fairies, but that's never stopped the #MeToo steamroller before.
/r/MensRights27/01/19 11:12 AM
23

Don't let a vocal minority fool you. Those tanks you see are blow-up dolls.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/01/19 03:06 PM
3

This is the point I've been making for forever. The second richest person on the planet will always be the person married to the richest.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 01:23 AM
0

I'm sure that's it.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/01/19 06:32 PM
0

Says you, still replying.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/01/19 06:32 PM
0

Still doesn't change the point that you're hyper-defensive about totally contradicting yourself in two messages.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/01/19 06:30 PM
2

You're a weird specimen.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/01/19 05:44 PM
0

Gross.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/01/19 05:42 PM
9

Subjective.
/r/MensRights23/01/19 07:24 AM
50

This makes sense, because Gillette's primary demographic is university-educated non-STEM women. /s
/r/MensRights23/01/19 07:21 AM
1

You...did. Is your total lack of self-awareness part of the joke?
/r/PussyPassDenied23/01/19 07:13 AM
4

ding·us /ˈdiNGɡəs/Submit S u b m i t You can't even copy and paste without fucking it up, buddy. Buddy. Champ. Pumpkin. Sweety-pie. Why do people do that?
/r/PussyPassDenied23/01/19 07:11 AM
6

There are plenty of reasons for divorce. That's not a fair, or even useful, generalisation.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/01/19 07:04 AM
10

This is great advice.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/01/19 07:01 AM
4

I respect women, and always have believed women are as equal to men in everyway. 2 seconds later: Yeah we aren’t equal in every way. But in all the ways that count we are. Dingus. Dingus Dingus
/r/PussyPassDenied23/01/19 06:59 AM
1

You said it, not me. What the fuck? So I’m on a lot of NyQuil right now. So we don’t like the feminazi right? Now to make my angle straight here. I don’t like super feminism (feminazi) but I respect women, and always have believed women are as equal to men in everyway. So when a misogynist, pulls shit on women I feel the same as women doing the same to men. I don’t hate women or men. I hate everybody.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/01/19 06:49 AM
1

Women are not equal to men in every way. Who the fuck thinks that?
/r/PussyPassDenied23/01/19 06:45 AM
47

Ruining someone's life because you can't own up to your own shit decision making r/iamatotalpieceofshit
/r/PussyPass21/01/19 06:22 PM
3

https://youtu.be/6c7FJqpF0po
/r/PussyPass21/01/19 01:53 AM
14

If course they can! Men rape men, silly. I have to say this or the demon in the back of my brain will eat me for implying that women can be evil too! 😁😁😁
/r/PussyPass21/01/19 01:52 AM
1

You will never find such a source. They don't exist.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 01:42 AM
3

I didn't watch the pretend Ghostbusters sequel as a point of principle. I will watch the real sequel, as a point of principle. Probably give it 5 stars too.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/01/19 01:22 AM
5

Cor, blimey!
/r/PussyPassDenied19/01/19 11:07 PM
21

I think he meant that it'd be a deterrent for wantonly signing away people's lives.
/r/MensRights19/01/19 07:21 PM
3

I posted something similar to this in another sub, but it's relevant: Laws only get changed when they disadvantage the privileged. For example, there's talk of making calling someone a Nazi a form of hate speech in the UK. Pro-Brexit voters have been dealing with it for years, but the second Anna Soubry gets the same treatment, it's all hands on deck!
/r/MensRights19/01/19 07:17 PM
4

Laws only get changed when they disadvantage the privileged. For example, there's talk of making calling someone a Nazi a form of hate speech in the UK. Pro-Brexit voters have been dealing with it for years, but the second Anna Soubry gets the same treatment, it's all hands on deck! I really doubt women will put up with this. But hey, it might take the weight off fathers at the same time. We'll see.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/01/19 02:08 PM
1

Source? Why is that?
/r/MensRights15/01/19 07:04 PM
1

Okay yeah that's probably closer to the truth.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 05:41 PM
5

What were they expecting...?
/r/PussyPassDenied15/01/19 05:11 PM
12

The women buying guys Gillette are the same women complaining about pink razors being more expensive than blue ones, not understanding that they're all functionally the same.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 04:49 PM
25

Fuck optics. I want truth.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 02:56 PM
19

Lol, I saw it. Even if what they are saying is correct and well documented, referencing RT really undermines our message.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 02:37 PM
5

Both sides of the aisle's arguments generally boil down to man bad woman weak, it's just that Democrats emphasise man bad, and Republicans emphasise woman weak. You're right though, Democrats are the least likely of the two to improve the situation for men.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 02:35 PM
37

even if it's true, it's bad optics What would you prefer: truth, or optics? Remember that we're already viewed as misogynists and crybabies by the majority of people in this sphere.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 02:26 PM
1

My wife kicked me out because I called her a cunt! Way to be a cunt, cunt!!!
/r/MensRights15/01/19 01:09 AM
18

You have been initiated into the Normal Human Club!
/r/PussyPassDenied15/01/19 01:05 AM
15

"respectful manhood" was the phrase that made me throw up a little in my mouth. Just imagine if they said the female equivalent.
/r/MensRights14/01/19 09:51 PM
15

They super-glued all of their eggs to the basket labelled "Gen-Z will be progressive", and for some reason they keep doing it until they're driven into the ground. #getwokegobroke
/r/MensRights14/01/19 09:48 PM
22

Ah, the magic of diversity-hiring.
/r/MensRights14/01/19 09:45 PM
-1

I'm glad you decided what we are talking about, thank you so much! You and I both know that the average person, put on jury duty, would not see a smile as harassment, in and of itself. If you to convince new people, be realistic.
/r/MensRights14/01/19 04:52 PM
0

Show me a case, where smiling at a woman has at least contributed to a jail sentence.
/r/MensRights14/01/19 03:31 PM
0

Prove a negative Prove the inversion of it.
/r/MensRights14/01/19 03:30 PM
-1

Nobody's going to jail for smiling at a woman. I've said many times before that I agree with the principle, and I agree that men get the shitty end of the stick in pretty much everything involving the legal system, but this ain't it chief. Be realistic; you'll get a lot more people on side.
/r/MensRights14/01/19 03:05 PM
2

This is actually a great line to go down with the people that pedal this sexist shit.
/r/MensRights14/01/19 11:04 AM
3

This is way more sensible.
/r/MensRights14/01/19 10:57 AM
1

My point is...not that. Honestly I wish I never said anything about how men would find relationships, since you're now all autistically riveted on that point. Yeah, I didn't think that one through. It's not like there aren't decent ways to figure it out though -- online dating is a good way to sift through the crazies, then going for a date in a public place for instance. I disavow my ill-thought-out advice. The real point, as I have repeatedly said, is that MGTOW isn't right for everyone. That'…
/r/MensRights13/01/19 12:18 PM
3

All good. It's just a tactic I run into a lot: people will try to trick you into defending something you don't actually agree with so they have an easy win.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/01/19 08:09 PM
0

Come on now. You're being absurd. Nobody's going to jail for smiling at a woman.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 07:34 PM
1

Aite, see ya.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 06:36 PM
2

Finally, a sensible point. I absolutely agree. And it's no secret that men get a bad deal either way. Thank you for such a helpful contribution.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 05:50 PM
0

Not once in this entire thread have I advocated marriage.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 05:47 PM
0

Look, I understand that I have offended your sensibilities by suggesting that many men aren't going to be emotionally complete without a woman. I get that. It's not easy being told that your hyperreactive dogmatic insistence that women aren't worth your time just won't work for every man. It's not nice being straw-manned, is it?
/r/MensRights12/01/19 05:39 PM
0

you missed the point so damn hard
/r/MensRights12/01/19 04:59 PM
2

What a weird thing to say, as a MGTOW. Implying that someone can't have relationships "all figured out" (spoiler alert: no one does) unless they're married.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 03:45 PM
-2

You don't lose an argument by insulting someone -- you lose by being wrong. Perhaps it wasn't wise to insult, but if that's the only problem with my argument, then there is no problem.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 03:43 PM
8

Fucking men for money Not prostitution Look, there's absolutely nothing wrong with prostitution. It's an honest exchange of currency for services. At least be honest about it though.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 03:24 PM
1

If you think I'm a troll, why did you respond to me again? I have told you that points 2 and 3 are not what I'm saying before. Again, why are you still trying to make me defend something I don't believe?
/r/MensRights12/01/19 03:21 PM
1

Thank you for your contribution.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 03:19 PM
2

There are no steps. I have said this before too. You appear to have missed that. It's individual. My original point of contention was that the other guy's advice won't work for most men. Sorry, that's how it is. Not everyone is compatible with MGTOW.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 02:29 PM
2

Getting to know someone is a pretty fucking good step in the right direction...no? What exactly do you have a problem with?
/r/MensRights12/01/19 02:06 PM
1

It's not backpedaling. I agree with everything I've said... That's why I said it. It's possible to build a life with someone without being married.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 01:55 PM
1

Start investing in VPN companies, bois
/r/MensRights12/01/19 01:44 PM
1

Still whiinninnnggggggggg?
/r/MensRights12/01/19 01:18 PM
1

Looks like my whiner joke scared you off, you little whiney whine whine whiner :)
/r/MensRights12/01/19 01:15 PM
1

I've paused my TV to watch you whine.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 01:11 PM
2

I am not married?
/r/MensRights12/01/19 01:10 PM
1

You've lost everyone, now. Not even the incels are gonna defend that.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 01:08 PM
1

Ironically, you're talking out of your arse.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 01:06 PM
1

There are no exact steps. It's obviously individual. I have no theory of perfectly successful marriages. Why are you trying to make me defend something I didn't say?
/r/MensRights12/01/19 12:56 PM
1

Curiosity about a detail of a subject does not equate to willingness to participate in that subject. This is a combination of ad hominem and a red herring. You're saying I'm wrong about your neuroticism because I asked a question about the chemical makeup of human faeces. It's an ad hominem because you said that you wouldn't listen to what I have to say because of it. It's a red herring because it's not related to the discussion at hand in any way. You're not going to weasel your way out of this…
/r/MensRights12/01/19 12:55 PM
0

As I have REPEATEDLY stated, you fucking idiot, I agree with you that shit is fucked. I refuse to argue against something I agree with. Why do you keep bringing it up?
/r/MensRights12/01/19 12:25 PM
1

I wasn't asking a guy who ate shit about anything, because I wasn't talking to a guy who ate shit. As it happens, someone with first-hand experience responded. What did I reply to him? My question was aimed more towards biologists of some stripe, as evidenced by my requirement that the answer be from a biological standpoint. Weren't you the one who told me to look up the definition of ad hominem?
/r/MensRights12/01/19 12:23 PM
-7

No, you get to know her first. Worked for me. Obviously it's not the ideal situation, and I am not content with it. However, as I've repeated many times now, my issue is that the other guy is giving one-size-fits-all advice to people. Many men would get quite lonely if they didn't allow themselves to enjoy women's company.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 12:21 PM
1

I... Literally don't? Quote me.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 12:18 PM
1

If you'll recall (and I know you're capable of that; you're clearly a smart young man), the behaviour I took issue with originally was you telling other men how to act, when that advice is not necessarily right for them.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 12:18 PM
1

The first line of your response doesn't work when followed by the second line.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 12:16 PM
1

I'm calling your reaction to the facts neurotic. I agree with most of your factual statements. Don't twist my words.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 12:09 PM
1

Regardless of whether what you say is true or not, you still have issues. At least do everyone a favour and stop pushing your own neuroticism on others.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 12:07 PM
1

You're internalising the bad news too much. It's not healthy.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 11:57 AM
2

Holy shit, dude. You've got some serious issues.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 11:56 AM
-10

It's not impossible, you fucking moron. You just need to play it safer than before. Less than 10% of British women identify as feminists, so it's not that hard to find the right kind of woman if you know where to look. Yes, I know the laws are fucked, the courts are biased, and public support for us and our cause is only just beginning to grow, but you can't seriously think "ignore your biological imperatives and never speak to anyone with a twat" is a rational or proportionate response to the s…
/r/MensRights12/01/19 11:55 AM
21

That may work just fine for you, but a lot of people genuinely want to build a life with a member of the opposite sex, as our ancestors have done all the way back to the dawn of the age of sexual dimorphism. It's not a one-size-fits-all solution, I'm afraid.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 11:47 AM
2

No, you were bitching about the few hypersuccessful women there are, claiming that those women didn't work for what they have. You're wrong. If you were saying the thing you just said in the first place, I would've agreed with you. That claim is backed up by statistics. Yours is not. I'm not sure what that entitled bitch has to do with anything either. She may be a bitch, but she did work for her success. That's basically the only thing she can't be insulted about. Get your head out of your arse…
/r/MensRights12/01/19 11:36 AM
1

J. K. Rowling? Let's not turn this sub into r/incel.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 11:17 AM
1

That's not exactly true. This wasn't a serious post.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 11:15 AM
2

Your argument comes from a place which is fundamentally authoritarian. It isn't the job of the State to impose any morality on its citizens. That's the citizens' job. The job of the state begins and ends at protecting the rights of the citizens (the difference between law and morality is that immoral actions don't necessarily violate rights).
/r/MensRights12/01/19 08:25 AM
5

Perhaps this would instill some bloody gratitude for what men actually do for the society.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 08:13 AM
20

While this is technically true, I want to warn you against trying to defend a position you don't believe. A "known school bully" is not at all comparable to, for instance, men, or white people, etc. I think you might've been straw-manned.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/01/19 07:44 AM
5

Is this actually true? Regardless, the gender pay gap is little more than trivia.
/r/MensRights11/01/19 01:42 PM
24

I mean, doubtful this is true, but the message is certainly believable.
/r/MensRights11/01/19 01:27 AM
3

I mean, theoretically, a turkey baster would do the job...
/r/MensRights10/01/19 08:29 PM
2

https://youtu.be/6c7FJqpF0po
/r/MensRights10/01/19 02:53 PM
1

One has nothing something?
/r/MensRights10/01/19 02:32 PM
7

They're authoritarians. What can I say? Any dissent, even presented agreeably enough to change an individual feminist's mind, must be crushed.
/r/MensRights10/01/19 02:31 PM
3

Thank you. I can only hope, for the future's sake, that they snap the fuck out of it.
/r/MensRights10/01/19 01:23 PM
21

The dictators of the 20th century are famous for the results of their purity spirals: hundreds of millions of corpses. Obviously I don't think the purity fanatics of today are going to go down that route, but it ties it in nicely, because, not only do they employ the same tactics as those dictators, most of them sympathise with socialist/communist ideas too. It just made me chuckle.
/r/MensRights10/01/19 01:20 PM
5

This. I don't understand how so many people are blind to the authoritarianism required to create equality of outcome over arbitrary groups whose interests and affinities differ significantly.
/r/MensRights10/01/19 12:15 PM
18

the picture of stalin nice
/r/MensRights10/01/19 12:06 PM
2

I think they're doing that weird thing some radicals do where they accuse us of using boys will be boys as an excuse for literal adult criminal behaviour.
/r/MensRights10/01/19 10:44 AM
2

Maybe that's why so many commies are drawn to feminism.
/r/MensRights10/01/19 10:41 AM
25

"They're anti-us! Eeeeeevvvvviiiiiiiilllllllll!"
/r/MensRights10/01/19 10:40 AM
1

Double-post! Original here: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/aeavk7/wait_what_the_actual_fk_vice_link_to_article_in/?st=JQQHCQQY&sh=c9f9484b
/r/MensRights10/01/19 10:39 AM
2

This is weirdly similar to my post history.
/r/MensRights10/01/19 12:56 AM
1

Thanks. I'll try to stick to the guidelines more rigidly. Have a great day~
/r/MensRights10/01/19 12:34 AM
1

Tribalism? What tribalism? Swiftly deletes anything that goes against the narrative
/r/MensRights10/01/19 12:29 AM
2

Oh man, this shit? If a drunk girl is responsible enough for DUI, she's responsible enough to keep her twat in her pants. This shit gets me riled.
/r/MensRights10/01/19 12:25 AM
1

I tried to post the link with "www" originally, but it kept saying "post failed". [Edit: misread. The link is np already.] As for shadowbanning, I'd rather just be banned outright if that's the direction you'll be taking this. I'm not going to post into the void. What will become of the second long thread started here?
/r/MensRights10/01/19 12:21 AM
1

It's basically impossible to screenshot that thread. It's enormous. Have you looked?
/r/MensRights10/01/19 12:12 AM
3

A wholesome end. Peace. ✌️
/r/MensRights09/01/19 11:20 PM
1

Perhaps you can take over from me.
/r/MensRights09/01/19 10:47 PM
2

It's a shame not many people will get this deep into the thread, because there's a lot there to have some really, genuinely interesting conversations about. I actually mean that. I won't be one of those engagers, though. I'm pretty spent for today, and I have enjoyed our talk. Honestly. I think you and I disagree on such a fundamental level, that no amount of back-and-fourthing will make us see eye-to-eye. I have no hard feelings towards you. Have a good day/night.
/r/MensRights09/01/19 10:45 PM
1

I've been talking about the issues from the start. It's made playing word games impossible. I think the main reason, for me, that you and I just can't seem to converse amicably about any issue is that you are unable to do so without misrepresenting what I'm saying to paint me in a bad light so you don't have to actually refute the points I'm making. Most responses to your paragraphs have been along the lines of "I didn't say that". I won't be bullied into defending something I don't believe.
/r/MensRights09/01/19 10:27 PM
1

It's a disingenuous question. We both know that. It's very obvious.
/r/MensRights09/01/19 10:13 PM
1

Literally in your previous comment you accused me of thinking myself justified to arbitrate women's behaviour. I do not, and that's why I don't do that. If you require more examples, I will oblige. This one just seemed especially obvious though. I think it's rather annoying that you've been restricted from posting in some manner. I'd much rather [mods, bots, etc.] kept out of it, as I think you and I are both grown up enough to handle a disagreement on our own. So, I don't agree with the restric…
/r/MensRights09/01/19 10:04 PM
12

Women aren't systemically oppressed; they got that one right. I think I can speak for the entire sub in saying that the others in that list are totally counter to our goals, as they bloody well should be.
/r/MensRights09/01/19 09:59 PM
1

You're doing that thing again, where you put me in your "safe" box where you know you can obliterate me. I am not saying most of the things you accuse me of saying, and I don't think most of the things you accuse me of thinking.
/r/MensRights09/01/19 09:53 PM
1

You haven't used any citations, and neither have I. The point you asked for citations for doesn't require them; all it required is that you understand that the numbers of female and male murderers are BOTH microscopically small. So small, as to be basically the same when compared to the total population. Sorry if that was unclear for you; I know you struggle (when it's convenient).
/r/MensRights09/01/19 09:46 PM
1

Also, I've got to say... What an absurdly petty example. You had all of that text to choose from, that that's all you found? I really was playing nice.
/r/MensRights09/01/19 09:43 PM
1

Why do you act like you know everything?
/r/MensRights09/01/19 09:42 PM
1

How so? Do you have an example?
/r/MensRights09/01/19 09:37 PM
1

I thought we stopped playing nice?
/r/MensRights09/01/19 09:37 PM
1

I don't think it's impossible to enlighten them. Edit: possible. I'm smart.
/r/MensRights09/01/19 09:36 PM
1

I'll post it in r/feminism for ya
/r/MensRights09/01/19 09:34 PM
1

Thx boo
/r/MensRights09/01/19 09:32 PM
2

I suppose? Generally I'd say most of the rhetoric from both sides of the aisle boils down to man bad woman weak. The left focuses on woman weak, and the right focuses on man bad, but it's all the same falsehood at the end of the day. Men are good and bad, and women are strong and weak.
/r/MensRights09/01/19 07:57 PM
5

Man bad, woman weak*
/r/MensRights09/01/19 07:43 PM
2

Why do these people totally flip the truth on its head so damn often? It's a genuine question. What do they get out of it? What are the possible motives?
/r/MensRights09/01/19 06:47 PM
23

She's still the victim because the man obviously did something awful to make her hate him enough to do this!
/r/MensRights23/12/18 09:21 AM
2

Women, there's blood in the water you drink. You could at least be grateful.
/r/MensRights16/12/18 12:23 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter