TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Sea-Bot Archive

View 0 posts and 23 comments by Sea-Bot on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
19

There needs to be a #hertoo movement, making sure that women committing domestic violence, sexual assault, false accusations, child abuse Etc are all brought to public shame. Women should be especially on board if the violence is against other women or girla, like in the case you mentioned. Everyone is so careful to include all types of relationships into conversation and focus these days, except when it comes to being accused of anything. Then we forget that heterosexual males aren't a part of …
/r/MensRights20/12/18 12:53 AM
2

I cannot believe you are being downvoted for suggesting that recording every encounter with a woman is not a "solution". How fucking scared and angry does everyone need to get before acting intelligently? I swear this sub doesnt want to be attached at the hip to incels, but making everyone scared of, and angry at, every single woman they interact with is how you get a bunch of fucking incels.
/r/MensRights24/10/18 12:43 AM
2

Gee...congratulations?
/r/MensRights29/07/18 03:46 AM
1

What a dig!
/r/MensRights05/07/18 05:50 AM
1

Another non point. Why dont you just come out and say you dont want to need permission to take a picture of someones crotch. Thats what this is about. Its not about fads, or revenge porn - its about how taking an upskirt without consent should or should not have consequences. At least have the balls to own up and say that you want to be able to objectify women and have visual access to their genitals at your desire. .Or, you know, just go be a decent human and get permission like the rest of us …
/r/MensRights20/06/18 03:52 AM
1

Why are you wasting both our time? You dont even understand what upskirting is, and clearly havent read or understood the article. We arent talking about distributing revenge porn - we are talking about upskirting, which is taking a picture of someones genitals without consent. You arent even arguing anything relevant. And if a man leaves sperm to his lover in his will, that IS him allowing his sperm to be given to someone. That IS consent. Maybe English isnt your first language, so i dont wanna…
/r/MensRights20/06/18 03:30 AM
1

The first one i clicked said the man left his sperm to his wife in his will. That is a consensted gift. Go figure...youre full of shit.
/r/MensRights20/06/18 03:10 AM
1

Jesus, your logic isnt nearly as sensible as you think. When does a woman fucking turkey baste your jiz out and give it to all her friends? Also, the main quote the article is written around is that women dont want scum bags taking unconsented pictures of their genital area. Therefor it wasnt even a gift in the first place. If you want ridiculous analogies, thats more like a woman stealing your jizz sock out of your garbage and giving it to her friends so they can try to have your child with it.…
/r/MensRights20/06/18 02:36 AM
3

Really? You cant see a difference between a man taking an upskirt, and the woman sending you her own nudes? Its the difference between consent or non-consent, which is the differences between appreciating a gift, or taking whats not yours. It also happens to be the difference between decency and being a piece of shit.
/r/MensRights20/06/18 01:12 AM
-2

What a stupid way to present this. Take an upskirt photo and you should fucking go to jail. Wait until Monday to say exactly this, and you arent a pervert. You have made no point, other than the fact that you think you can hate on anything women support, and have men to back you up. Jackass. Edit: I mean, ffs, you botched the punctuation so badly, how can anyone even take you seriously?
/r/MensRights19/06/18 07:05 AM
-2

Who the fuck cares? Open a door and piss. Have you seriously never used a ladie's room to avoid a wait? It takes a bitch to bitch this much...
/r/MensRights15/06/18 06:17 AM
2

Thanks, look forward to reading, and appreciate the info.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 05:26 PM
3

Yah, so mainly miscommunication or stupidity. The comment is worded to make it seem like single mothers are putting children in harm more than fathers, and thats a big claim that needs a big source. Thanks.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 05:52 AM
2

Do you have any sources that would make this seem like less of a stretch? For instance, an abducted child is almost certainly in the custody of his/her single mother. Would love to be able to believe that, but you have nothing backing it up.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 04:40 AM
-1

Im referring to his stance specifically. You said he, specifically, was claiming the disposability of men. He did not. He made an assumption of how the data may have been skewed towards making the point you are claiming. It may have been an incorrect one, but nowhere did he claim men are more disposable. Maybe he is a man hater, or maybe he is just trying to be open to all possibilities, but putting words in others mouths makes for inaccurate debate.
/r/MensRights22/05/18 06:56 PM
0

I dont think he said anywhere males are worth less. I think he is just assuming males tend to be a part of gang violence more than females, and therefore putting themselves at risk of being an untargeted victim. That may be an incorrect assumption, but I think youre putting words in his mouth by claiming he thinks male lives are worth less.
/r/MensRights22/05/18 06:47 PM
1

I realize that. Im not claiming that the males are gang related, im just saying he is making that assumption, correct or not.
/r/MensRights22/05/18 06:44 PM
-5

No, hes saying that he thinks that these male victims may be involved in gangs, so their likelihood of being shot is higher because they may be putting themselves in a situation where they are more likely to be hit by a bullet. Being in a gang or gang affiliated doesnt mean you are specifically a target, and he is assuming this hasnt been taken into account, and therefore means that a fifty fifty split would actually point to women being more affected by something they arent involved in.
/r/MensRights22/05/18 04:48 PM
1

Yah, this is entering sjw territory - making a huge deal out of little things. Sure, maybe its a minor double standard, but do we really need to stoop so low into self martyrdom over such things? Keep your head above the water gents.
/r/MensRights24/03/18 10:10 PM
1

This is something I'm SURE you have proof of or documentation supporting.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 04:33 AM
1

Please share these facts
/r/MensRights28/09/17 04:07 AM
5

Get bent
/r/PussyPassDenied27/07/17 08:20 AM
14

Because a pull up doesn't get heavy equipment from point a to b. Pull ups are in no way related to carrying things. And a woman being able to do more pull ups could mean they weigh 50% as much, but are 51% as strong. It's really not a measurement of anything applicable to being a soldier, except doing pull ups.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 05:35 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter