TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SeaLevelIQ Archive

View 1 post and 82 comments by SeaLevelIQ on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

DiscussionSeaLevelIQ/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 02:16 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
28

But I thought posing with pets adds "PeRSoNaliTy" and is attractive!!! Tbh, not even sure I'd call this blackpill, but it's still hilarious how so many things that inceltears and other redditors say end up being exact opposite in reality.
/r/BlackPillScience23/07/22 09:48 PM
1

I already mentioned lonely_men. Small userbase and private. Incredibly tame and got removed for absolutely no reason. I can't remember some other ones, but I remember one was named cope_kingdom or something similar. Barely even talked about women. There was one called inceleryconsumers (I think I was a mod for that one). Very short-lived. Admittedly, it was a bit wilder than the other ones, but there was no advocating violence whatsoever. The absolute worst thing I remember being said about wome…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/22 10:01 PM
1

Pretty much. The downvote/upvote system with its' hidden comments, the way blocking works etc. Reddit creates echo chambers by design and subreddit mods tend to be the catalyst in that with how they usually act. This kind of forum design is good for getting help with something practical, like torrenting or fixing something. It's good if it's something that people mostly agree on and/or aren't too emotionally attached to their beliefs on that particular topic. That way bad advice gets downvoted a…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/22 10:31 PM
5

Blatantly untrue. I was a part of a couple of small scale incel subs that all got banned recently, the most recent one being lonely_men. As far as I could see there was no hate speech whatsoever. Some of those subs didn't even allow incel terminology, they all got banned and none of us had any clue why. There were barely any members, the subs were easy to moderate and cleaner than most controversial subs that continue to stay up for a long time. Hell, even bigger subs like IWH didn't advocate fo…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/22 02:13 PM
3

Ratings of 5, 6 and 7? So consistently in the range of above average to average? Where's the problem? You expected them all to be rated 10? Just because they're models doesn't mean they're gods. For any model out there you can probably find a more attractive woman at your workplace or school. They are only human after all, being famous doesn't make you divine like many people seem to think nowadays. I remember a thread where someone asked women to give example pics of what they consider an avera…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/22 11:44 PM
1

Bro, how do I fucking reply to a comment like that? It's like I'm talking to a bot in pre-alpha.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 09:18 PM
2

If you're not a troll I just don't know what to tell you lol. Try to observe things rather than blindly jump to conclusions.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 09:10 PM
7

That account is a woman lol
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 05:34 PM
2

Well yeah, but this is the complete opposite of what hypothetical man in the OP was saying to the woman. Man to the woman: "You are attractive" Woman to the man: "You are unattractive" It's a no-brainer why the latter feels insulting. Everybody wants to be seen as attractive, nobody wants to be seen as unattractive, duh. It's difficult to understand why the former is insulting though. Even if you don't wanna sleep with the man, why is it insulting to receive the offer? It basically just means he…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 11:38 PM
7

Nothing in the post or the comment even remotely implies death threats. Calling someone's standards too high, or calling them hypergamous is not abuse ffs. And this is not about rejections either, it's about discussing standards/preferences.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/21 03:40 AM
6

way to defend abusers. What the hell are you talking about? Getting salty over being told you're unnatractive counts as abuse now?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/21 03:33 AM
1

Only partly true. Part of it is that they also don't wanna present themselves as shallow (men do this too) and part of it is also that they themselves genuinely don't know what they prefer. Like a lot of women say that a good sense of humour is attractive, but there was a piece of research stating that men's ability to make women laugh didn't impact their attractiveness, however, the men who women found attractive were perceived as funnier by said women. In other words, it's not that being funny…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/21 03:28 AM
2

How about the sentiment that all men are rapists until proven otherwise and similar batshit insane worldviews? The wall of text you just wrote is an obvious strawman, but honestly even if it weren't, it's such a mild and insignificant thing compared to the rest of the sub, but you still chose to address this minor point over all the valid criticism people have of FDS. Interesting how you choose your battles.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/21 03:07 AM
1

He's clearly bashing coomers from what I can read in these text snippets. But he made the title in a way to make it seem like he's bashing anti-coomers. But why? Isn't he an anti-coomer? He's displaying the most classic sentiments of anti-coomers. So why is he bashing people who agree with him? Why is he bashing his own beliefs, but reinforcing them at the same time? What the hell is going on? I think even the author is confused as to which side is he on.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen10/12/21 02:40 AM
3

A double standard is not when a different standard is applied to different cases, only when a different standard is applied to the same situation. Since the situation is not the same for men and women, what he said is not a different standard for the same situation, it's a different standard for different situations and thus not a double standard.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/21 01:35 PM
16

What double standard? That women are damaged for being virgins, but not men. If so, then I agree with you. That's ridiculous. But if you disagree that it's a lot easier for women to score in the dating game, then you're trolling because I've seen you too many times in here to genuinely be so clueless.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/21 10:55 PM
16

I don't agree with the guy above, but you're not considering that it's a lot more accessible for women to get experience so it's not really comparable.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/21 10:48 PM
1

Just say you're not attracted to short/er guys and be done with it. It basically conveys the same message you just did, but without any extra steps and mental gymnastics.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/21 02:02 PM
9

I think it's not really about insecurity, it is actually about height. The bit about insecurity is a handy justification. Just my opinion, but it sure makes a lot more sense than what she's presenting as you've already pointed out.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/21 02:42 PM
2

I thought we were comparing the attractiveness of modern men and prehistoric men through the same lens. Like if you were to put an average modern man and an average prehistoric man next to each other. I see now that your point is that prehistoric men were more attractive to prehistoric women than modern men are attractive to modern women. That muddies the picture a bit. I won't give you intelligence. Obviously, prehisotric people didn't document or record anything so we can't really know for sur…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/21 08:09 PM
3

If we hung out platonically and then you went on to be romantic that's one thing. If you befriended me with the intention of dating me then don't. How do you tell the difference? To me it looks like the approach could be identical for both cases and you'd have to be a mind reader to know what the true intention was.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/21 07:05 PM
10

It's impressive how interesting this theory is and yet it's immedately obvious that it's wrong on every single level. And I'm not even saying that because I'm biased due to being unattractive, I would actually love for you to be right. Men in the past were shorter, but you say they'd win against modern men because they were more physically fit? If that were the case, all of my problems (and any short guy's problems tbh) in dating would be solved lol. Sounds like heaven. But ofc that's simply not…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/21 06:49 PM
1

You'll find mean and violent people in any demographic you look. Some women are mean and violent too. Would it make sense to you if there was a comment emphasizing how women are generally violent and mean? No, it would most likely get called out. Women are actually less violent and mean than men are (generally speaking) and whoever made that statement likely has some prejudice towards women. Same thing with you and your comment about lonely men. Stats say they are actually less violent than the …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/21 11:21 AM
3

Who do you think are these "loneliest men"? They're uggos. And contrary to your biased opinion, single men who are not sexually active are less likely to be violent than men who are sexually active and single (since sexual competition is among the causes for violence). As for seeing women as objects I don't have anything that specific to prove you wrong there, but let's be real, neither do you. You only have your extremely biased opinion that has no basis in reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/21 09:04 AM
4

Oh look, another one is conflating being ugly with being an asshole and having a bad personality. I guess some of our most primitive biases will never go away.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/21 09:39 PM
1

Loaded question. Who says women can't work? Seriously, what did I miss? It's not even these ridiculous posts that get me anymore, it's the fact there are people looking at it thinking "hmmm good question, let me upvote it" lol
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/21 08:27 PM
0

Thank god vine died. Holy shit dude. You still need to read something before forming an opinion on it tho.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/21 01:55 PM
2

So basically: men are insecure due to the actions of other men behaving badly....how are women at fault? You need to read the post before you comment. Nowhere does it say it's women's fault for having orbiters. You just made that up. It's only stated that women don't experience that first-hand and that they shouldn't be dismissive of it because if the tables were turned, they would be just as if not even more insecure than men in that situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/21 08:58 AM
2

Completely expected. Generally speaking people will always prioritize their own ass. But it's still funny, I agree.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/21 09:32 PM
5

Not all forms of discrimination are illegitimate, some are perfectly reasonable. Making a law that prohibits children from driving is discrimination, but it's a perfectly reasonable form of discrimination. Just because it has an unpleasant ring to it, doesn't mean it's wrong. If you're one of those people that gets offended over words and their definitions, then buzz off because I just don't have the energy for it. Should we then stop saying that it's bad to hit women? Because that is also sexis…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/21 04:24 PM
8

It's called sexism because it technically is sexism, i.e. treating people differently based on their sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/21 02:35 PM
2

I'm sorry, but there is nothing wrong with this profile except it being cringe-inducing. It doesn't deserve a spot in this sub. She's not being entitled, hypocritical, or complaining there are "no good men". Don't let the sub turn to shit, it's better to have small amount of quality content than a lot of shit/random/non-fitting content.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/07/21 03:03 PM
1

It's got more to do with frustration about being undesirable in general than it does with you specifically. Not everything revolves around you.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/21 07:38 PM
1

Why is that something you'd be happy about?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/21 01:45 PM
1

Any man who finds himself a woman who responds to him as fast as you respond to me is one lucky fella.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/21 05:23 PM
1

You can't. But there is a rule of thumb saying the one who's always on stand-by to deliver a response within seconds is the mad one. Just saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/21 03:07 PM
1

You can't really tell by text alone if someone's lashing out, but what you can do is make assumptions based on projection.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/21 01:07 PM
1

Well, in that case, the only reason you're arguing with me is because you don't wipe your ass properly. It's always women who don't wipe their asses that respond badly to advice and react in this exact way. I've been keeping track and you check all the boxes. Don't argue, it's science.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/21 04:18 AM
1

I genuinely don't. You didn't ignore me, you responded with passive-agressive snark. That's why I assumed you were offended. And everything below that sentence just straight-up doesn't make sense. There's no connection to anything that's been said here.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 10:39 PM
2

If they are not considered as another potential option, they are not an alternative. The end. Lol this is funny. Just like every time a man cat calls me and I ignore him, I just took offense. And when he calls me fat or ugly, it’s because I’m actually fat and/or ugly. Not because of his own insecurities. Huh?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 10:19 PM
2

If I really argued with every woman who's standards I don't meet, I wouldn't have time to eat or sleep. The actual reason I'm arguing is much simpler: you used a word incorrectly, I pointed it out, you disagreed. No need for psychoanalyzing. Preference - a greater liking for one alternative over another or others. So your want for >6 is not a preference. You don't see <6 as a less appealing alternative and >6 as a more appealing alternative. You don't see <6 as an alternative at all. The definit…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 09:33 PM
0

Or you can just learn what words mean before using them.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/21 12:44 PM
3

That's not the correct use of the word preference, but sure I understand what you mean. Maybe it's this incorrect usage that creates misunderstandings sometimes.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/21 07:24 PM
2

You're talking about dealbreakers here, not preferences. Redditors say height is just a preference, rumors go that it's a dealbreaker and redditors usually deny that rumor, but like the guy says, it turns out the rumor is true.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/21 10:38 PM
2

What's the minimum?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/21 03:49 PM
7

Not everything is about you specifically. Jesus fucking Christ. Look at the thread, there are plenty of additional dealbreakers shared by other women.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/21 03:43 PM
8

Curious how they say men would find this meme a "hate crime" when it's almost exclusively women who vocally oppose these "boys vs girls" memes. The only slight chance where this could be considered a "hate crime" on reddit would be if it were posted by a male user. But even then, most likely not. Proving FDS wrong would be as easy as posting this on r/memes or something and witnessing 0 people having a problem with it. In fact, since it's such an easy to understand, low-effort, overdone to death…
/r/AntiFeminists21/05/21 08:15 PM
5

Because he didn't even try. As soon as he put minimal effort into meeting women he was basically swimming in pussy even with 0 experience and 0 game at a very late age.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/21 09:48 PM
5

Straight women recognize other women's attractiveness all the time and no one has an urge to question their sexuality because of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/21 09:45 PM
2

If you meet anyone who matches this criteria please let me know. I have never met anyone, myself included. Everyone does that, even you. Even those that don't read studies ever still observe the world around them and come to their own conclusions. You don't wake up one day and project onto women that short men are unattractive. You see women's preferences irl, you read questionaires, studies, ask women themselves and from there it's pretty easy to form an opinion without any projections. I ackno…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/21 09:56 AM
1

I'm sure no couple would last if they didn't found each other's personalities attractive. But how much you wanna bet they wouldn't have found each other's personalities attractive if they weren't attracted to each other's looks? Same personality displayed by a short and tall men would be perceived completely differently. Why's there no term like 'tall man syndrome' even though taller men generally lose temper more easily than shorter men? Looks are a huge part of how personality is perceived and…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/21 09:39 AM
13

Idk. Most couples I know have insanely different personalities with very few exceptions. Not everything is a fucking projection. Sometimes people observe the world around them, collect data and make conclusions based on that. And guess what data says: looks are the most accurate predictor of initial romantic interest. Personality played no part. Now of course, that doesn't disprove your claim that personality matters in attraction, but there's simply no evidence for it. And it's not like no one …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/21 04:55 PM
2

Huh... Maybe that's why there's this notion that dating gets better for men as they age. It never made a lot of sense to me, but this could be one of the possible reasons.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 06:51 AM
2

Obviously the entire thing is ridiculous, but the part about physical traits perfectly demonstrates sthe lack of self-awareness. These are the women on a subreddit that's constantly harping on and on about how hairy men and balding men are gross. Just because a physical trait is a sign of older age, doesn't mean it's attractive. And it doesn't mean you're a pedohpile if you find it unattractive. If they dissagree, then they are by their own standards even bigger pedos than the men they complain …
/r/AntiFeminists06/04/21 06:05 PM
2

Did you not read the post (and the comments)? They're trying to erase the body image pressure for women, but are actively enforcing it on men by openly claiming fat men are unattractive. It's fine if you wanna focus on women, but the moment you start applying rules on men that you say are not ok being applied to women, you are a hypocrite.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/21 08:06 PM
2

How does that make it any better? Claiming it's only ok for women to be fat, but not men is even stupider than dodging the question lmao. It'd be absolutely fine if they were simply focusing on women's body positivity and ignored men's, but they go out of their way to body-shame men and that's what makes them blatantly hypocritical.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/21 07:46 PM
1

You literally said "men on here" lmao how is that refering to specific users? I don't think you could get any less specific if you tried. I mean, men make the majority of the userbase. There aren't even any such comments on this post or on this entire sub at all lately. You're making shit up.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/21 05:18 PM
1

"I was so desperate, my life was dogshit, nothing working out for me... Until I joined this awesome group. I became happy, my life was beautiful, everything started working out!" Sound familiar? lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/21 07:52 AM
3

Did it ever occur to you that those might not be the same men? This is like saying: "One moment women be like 'Promiscuity and porn is the best' and then the next moment they all be like 'nah, sis, that's degrading'. Can't they just make up their minds?" You see, just because some people have the same genitalia, doesn't mean they are all the same person. It doesn't mean they all have to have the same beliefs either. Is this really something that had to be explained to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/21 07:39 AM
4

They're full of contradictions and inconsistencies, but there IS one thing that they're consistent about and that is disliking men and finding reasons to dislike men. The last time I checked FDS, the 80/20 rule was trendy to discuss at the time. There were two posts that sticked out the most to me (both posted on the same day 4 hours apart). One was about how men are idiots for believing the 80/20 and they are never to be taken seriously. The other was about how the 80/20 was true and that it pr…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/21 01:34 PM
1

Just don't answer and ghost them completly.... it doesn't even justify a response. Why are you talking about? This interaction made my day.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/03/21 07:28 PM
-1

Make a claim and then repeat it. Very convincing.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/21 03:09 PM
2

how does that matter How does the way you look matter? In the dating world? Idk man, it's really strange how some people think that looks matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/21 07:01 PM
5

By being below average in looks. Inb4 looks don't matter bro
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/21 05:40 PM
8

Not everyone can work to be great. Some can work harder than any red-piller and be closer to average, but still noticably below. In that case, the work is not worth it. To me, people who say this are either normsplaining or they just don't value their time and effort that much.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/21 02:19 PM
2

If you really believe all this, why are you dating a 160 cm tall man?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/21 08:42 PM
10

But short women still reproduced and passed on their genes. OP and other women with similar views apparently think it's only men's genes that get spread, so men are the only ones who have to be held to an impossible standard while every woman is a queen and deserves chad.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/21 07:57 PM
0

Can't find friends because of this? So literally every woman she meets is lesbian and every man she meets is straight and every single one of those people only wants sex from her? Yeah ok.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/20 05:15 PM
1

You don't have to assume when it's already been proven that women find the majority of men to be below average. Don't complain to me that it's impossible statistically, take it up with women. They are the ones who rate the majority of men as below average in questionaires, logic be damned. The thing about compensating for looks with other things also happens, but discussion here was purely about looks. If we only factor in looks, women would either date up or wouldn't date at all. Additionally, …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/20 10:17 AM
7

So you agree that it does prove a point?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/20 09:03 PM
10

So you agree that it does prove a point?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/20 09:02 PM
7

For the millionth time You can assert it ten million times, it still won't mean anything if you can't back it up. Your own subjective judgement won't do, epsecially considering women find majority of men to be below average in looks. So not exactly someone I'd pick to be an arbiter on judging this sort of thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/20 08:36 PM
5

This would be the single greatest thing to ever exist if it were real and not scripted.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/10/20 10:08 PM
1

Where is the pussypass in this example and how was it denied? Wrong sub.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/08/20 12:42 PM
1

What are you even talking about? Point out exactly where the OP is criticizing or "calling into question" someone's preferences. The subject matter is this specific post, which is a question as clear as it can be: "what do you find attractive in big height differences?" The subject matter is not other posts you see on this sub. This comment section is for this post specifically.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/20 08:42 PM
1

Ok, even if we assume what you're saying is the case, how does that relate to this post? This comment section is for this post specifically, not every other post that mentions height or whatever.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/20 08:26 PM
5

Yes, and OP never implied otherwise. He asked for specifics as to why women find that attractive. Can't people be curious?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/20 02:36 PM
3

Ok, but why is someone a low SOI, neurotic nebbish dweeb? You never said anything that disproves it's feminism, society or your mother to blame. I'm not saying that's the case, just that you didn't even attempt to contend that point. I think TRPs would generally agree with you on everything you've said here except the title, but the post is never really about why it isn't society, parents, etc. to blame. So although I found this very insightful, you still completely missed the mark with this pos…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/20 09:12 PM
2

The way you chose to back up your claim is purely subjective and I think it actually supports OP's view. Could it be that you see more attractive women with what you consider to be unattractive men because you judge men more harshly on their appearance? I agree that men have higher standards when it comes to choosing for LTR as opposed to ONS (duh), but even those standards are still nowhere as high as women's. The claim that men are subjected to infintely higher standards appearance-wise is sup…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/20 08:15 PM
0

Your comment has nothing to do with the post. The post was about how men are judged more harshly on their apperance than women are and you've done nothing to challenge that claim.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/20 02:01 PM
1

It's a non-option. Using your approach, you can handwave away any problem that a human could possibly experience. "Oh, you are maimed for life and feel bad about it? You should feel lucky because YOU HAVE AN OTPION to kill yourself." See, just because something is technically an option, doesn't mean it's an option that should ever be considered. I think the point of the post is that betabux is that sort of non-option; it's technically an option, but it's so bad that it should ideally never even …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/20 10:13 PM
3

Sporty but golf doesn't count Chess it is.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/07/20 02:53 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter