~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| -5 | PURE evil.“Men’s rights” | /r/MensRights | 07/03/18 06:43 PM |
| -1 | Are men’s rights not human rights?It’s pretty obvious it’s going to talk about different rights movements and changes through history. But keep getting all worked up and outraged about everything every day. This is why no one takes any of you seriously and never will, you start screeching in rage at any even perceived slight without even taking a second to breathe and think about it. Not everything that doesn’t directly address you is an attack on you. In fact, men are a huge part and often primarily responsible for many of the … | /r/MensRights | 01/03/18 11:47 AM |
| 1 | Chaps, this is what a real feminist looks like. And in the interests of this sub, we should applaud her for it.It is a fallacy and your own biased opinion. You’re deciding (based on nothing but your own opinion) that only true feminists are like this woman. Anyone who isn’t like her or doesn’t care about basically only these things isn’t a “true feminist” Funny watching you keep trying to change the subject. Hint: that’s a fallacy too. Remember, you wrote a huge rant because someone mistakenly said the wrong fallacy and now you’re desperately trying to avoid simply admitting that this post and your argum… | /r/PussyPassDenied | 29/01/18 07:23 PM |
| 1 | Chaps, this is what a real feminist looks like. And in the interests of this sub, we should applaud her for it.Writing a small novel doesn’t change the obvious point that the post is a No True Scotsman fallacy. there must a non essential element. I.E. "No true Scotsman would ever put ice in his brandy." No, that isn’t part of it at all. Not really sure where you made that up from honestly. It’s about the argument, not whether you arbitrarily determine something as “essential” The defining characteristic of Feminism is equality between the sexes and working toward that goal. And you’re trying to argue tha… | /r/PussyPassDenied | 29/01/18 06:46 PM |
| 1 | Chaps, this is what a real feminist looks like. And in the interests of this sub, we should applaud her for it.It would be, excepting one thing. The no true scotsman fallacy requires ad hoc generalization or moving of goalposts Which is what’s happening clearly. “Only a true feminist does this and anyone who isn’t like this isn’t “feminist”” That’s literally the argument of the post. It’s a fallacy. It’s as straightforward as it gets. Your entire follow up attempt at a defense is just more of the same argument. I’ll quote someone in this thread: “So what we can determine from this is that you have no clu… | /r/PussyPassDenied | 29/01/18 10:37 AM |
| 1 | Chaps, this is what a real feminist looks like. And in the interests of this sub, we should applaud her for it.It is still a fallacy though and it’s fairly obvious that it is one. It’s saying that only true feminists are like this woman and everyone else is wrong. It’s an obvious form of the No True Scotsman fallacy. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 29/01/18 02:15 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter