Sean_Sltr Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
167	We shouldn't mock nor invalidate sexually abused men and boys - don't forget about them.	social issues	Sean_Sltr	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	20/02/24 10:16 PM

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
39	it only takes a single day to ruin your life Hookups are overall bad, but I also disagree with focusing only on a woman's consent, for a man can also be assaulted. Thank you for posting it here.	/r/EverydayMisandry	25/02/24 01:23 PM
-8	I think that this belongs here Yes, you don't have any arguments, so you resort to a low-quality meme YouTube film. How pathetic of you. But what to expect from a teenager/young adult?	/r/EverydayMisandry	24/02/24 04:31 PM
-13	I think that this belongs here I watch porn regularly. I'm anything but depraved or vicious. If you watch porn regularly, you are indeed vicious. Unless you want to stop it - if this is a case, I would support you. But if you willfully watch this content, I can't help but view you as an impure person. According to your profile description, you are "hypersexual" and "polyamorous". It doesn't reflect well on you. Although autism and ADHD aren't vices, because they're just neurodevelopmental disorders (according to Wikipedia), y…	/r/EverydayMisandry	24/02/24 04:28 PM
-25	I think that this belongs here Well, maybe we shouldn't kill men watching pornography, but they're undoubtedly vicious and depraved. I wouldn't support this woman shooting her boyfriend with a gun, but I would wholeheartedly stand up for her if she broke up with him.	/r/EverydayMisandry	24/02/24 07:47 AM
1	Can I just take a moment to say how lovely it is that a lot of us on here calling out this misandry are women? If I'm against sexuality in general, it's not misogyny nor misandry. If I was against female sexuality exclusively, it would be misogyny. If I was against male sexuality exclusively, it would be misandry. So, am I a misandrist or a misogynist, according to your opinion? My antisexuality is separate from both misandry or misogyny. No need to conflate antisexuality with a hatred of any particular gender.	/r/EverydayMisandry	22/02/24 02:51 PM
3	Can I just take a moment to say how lovely it is that a lot of us on here calling out this misandry are women? I'm glad you rejected misandry and support men. I appreciate it. Yes, misogyny and misandry are two sides of the same coin of hate. As it's important to help, for example, abused women, we should also help abused men. We need more empathy for men than now, for men are rarely supported and often mocked. Especially male victims of sexual violence are laughed at and told that "they were lucky".	/r/EverydayMisandry	22/02/24 08:18 AM
1	We shouldn't mock nor invalidate sexually abused men and boys - don't forget about them. The purpose of procreation. But I imply that sexuality even inside marriage should be only tolerated, not celebrated. That means sex is a necessary evil to reproduce. Therefore, it can be tolerated inside strict boundaries and limits.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	21/02/24 09:00 AM
1	We shouldn't mock nor invalidate sexually abused men and boys - don't forget about them. It's a specific union between people. Sexuality is overall bad, but inside this union, it can serve a higher purpose. Otherwise, it's simply a dope.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	21/02/24 08:53 AM
1	We shouldn't mock nor invalidate sexually abused men and boys - don't forget about them. You know who was promiscuous? Adolf Hitler! He even was an incestuous relationship with his niece. The Nazis weren't pure! They did drugs. Hitler did drugs and the German army consumed it too.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	21/02/24 08:51 AM
1	We shouldn't mock nor invalidate sexually abused men and boys - don't forget about them. Mein Kampf is also an art, right? /s, I condemn Nazism	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	21/02/24 08:48 AM
1	We shouldn't mock nor invalidate sexually abused men and boys - don't forget about them. Marriage is a clear boundary for reproduction, so some sexuality could be tolerated for the sake of our survival. Cheating is wrong, though. Otherwise, we should seek to stay sexually innocent.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	21/02/24 08:47 AM
1	We shouldn't mock nor invalidate sexually abused men and boys - don't forget about them. You, u/Low_Rich_5436 and u/MelissaMiranti spread pro-sexual propaganda. Especially the latest, as she admitted she writes erotic literature. I searched her name, as she asked me and she indeed creates degenerate content. That's especially vile propaganda method - books for brainwashing.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	21/02/24 08:45 AM
0	We shouldn't mock nor invalidate sexually abused men and boys - don't forget about them. Sex is generally bad and can be tolerated as a mean of reproduction or showing love inside long-term relationships. Otherwise, it's primitive and impure. If anything, sexuality is meant for reproduction inside marriages, not a primitive pleasure in hookups. Generally, men should also be pure and held to same rigorous standards. It was bad when only women were expected to stay innocent, when men had a free pass. We should instate the equality of purity. Men also should refrain from hookups, from …	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	21/02/24 08:40 AM
-1	We shouldn't mock nor invalidate sexually abused men and boys - don't forget about them. If we hold men to the same standards, it's not a mean to control only women, for men are also controlled. We would have equal control and purity. Sex is for reproduction, yes, but not for hookups. Sex can be tolerated as a mean of reproduction or love inside long-term relationships, like marriages. No to extramarital sex like cheating or one-night stands!	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	21/02/24 08:32 AM
1	We shouldn't mock nor invalidate sexually abused men and boys - don't forget about them. Excessive sexuality, like promiscuity, is shameful for literally everyone (I don't shame sexually abused people - it's not their fault, I shame only voluntary sex degenerates). Men should be held to the same rigorous standards as women. No sleeping around, no swearing, no drugs etc. When only women are expected to be pure, it's misogyny. When we introduce liberalisation, it's equality of degeneracy. When we expect everyone to be morally and legally innocent, it's both equality and purity. Truly …	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	21/02/24 08:26 AM
-9	We shouldn't mock nor invalidate sexually abused men and boys - don't forget about them. Purity is more important than "muh FrEeDoM". Americans are so obsessed with "freedom". If the people "are under the boot" and thanks to that "oppression" they're equally pure, childlike and innocent, I'm in. Freedom is when you're degenerate and totalitarianism is when there are virtue. /s	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	21/02/24 08:13 AM
1	We shouldn't mock nor invalidate sexually abused men and boys - don't forget about them. Muh FrEeDoM! Innocence and purity are more important than any "freedom". Goodbye!	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	21/02/24 08:09 AM
-9	We shouldn't mock nor invalidate sexually abused men and boys - don't forget about them. Sex-negative feminism is way better than sex-positive feminism. The first believes in equal virtue and second believes in equal vice.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	21/02/24 08:08 AM
1	We shouldn't mock nor invalidate sexually abused men and boys - don't forget about them. I think everyone should be pure. That's gender equality. Equality under the law of purity. I appreciate what you are doing for men. I read your comments on the matter of male victims of sexual viooence. As I wrote in another comment somewhere, I like when someone crosses the gender "aisle" and helps the opposite sex. It's pretty good that you, as a woman, stick up for, for example, male victims of sexual abuse. In return, I also combat those who want unequal standards for men and women (evidence…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	21/02/24 08:00 AM
0	We shouldn't mock nor invalidate sexually abused men and boys - don't forget about them. Only if we shame promiscuous men, which I personally do. Despite my explanations, you mistakenly view it as "misogyny". If there's misogyny, I'm also a misandrist for shaming promiscuous men. It doesn't have nothing with misogyny nor misandry in my version. We should shame everyone who is promiscuous, regardless of their gender. Everyone should be pure! I can repeat it again and again - combine gender equality with purity! That goes against both misogyny and misandry. Look, we both believe in ge…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	21/02/24 07:52 AM
-4	We shouldn't mock nor invalidate sexually abused men and boys - don't forget about them. Oh, that's sad and heartbreaking. Indulge in degeneracy if you want, maybe someday you will miss that primal purity with whom we are born. And maybe you should try not judging what I do with my cunt. Promiscuity is bad. But I also judge men what they do with their penises, if we put it that way. I don't discriminate against women. I can repeat it again and again: I believe in equal expectations for men and women - gender-egalitarian purity rules. Promiscuous men are also disgusting and degenerat…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	21/02/24 07:46 AM
0	We shouldn't mock nor invalidate sexually abused men and boys - don't forget about them. Sex can be tolerated for reproduction and love inside long-term relationships, otherwise it's a primitive pleasure. Don't try to pretend that women, or anyone of any gender, should have your attitude towards sex. It's incredibly stupid and damaging to everyone who believes even a little bit of your drivel. Men should also be pure. Yes, "slut-shaming" is hypocritical. What should be done is to shame promiscuous men in same manner. Everyone should be held to the same standards. Regarding the proce…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	21/02/24 07:15 AM
-11	We shouldn't mock nor invalidate sexually abused men and boys - don't forget about them. No. Sex, especially outside a long-term relationships, is gross and impure. I recommend to read more topics on this antisex sub with arguments against sexuality. I think that sex goes against our innocence, that's why I lean sex-negative. You should read my post about childlike innocence: https://www.reddit.com/r/antisex/comments/1aulk3u/we_should_oppose_both_conservative_values_and/ I'm against swearing, hookups, drugs and violence, meanwhile favouring politeness, purity and innocence. When we …	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	21/02/24 06:46 AM
6	We shouldn't mock nor invalidate sexually abused men and boys - don't forget about them. Forced male genital mutilation is also a problem. And it's horrible that it's overlooked. Not to sound antisemite, but maybe it's due to Orthodox Jewish influence - Judaism has a tradition of boys' circumcision, and Orthodox Jews want to preserve this tradition. I agree that circumcisions should be banned for boys, with the exception of medical reasons, like phimosis. Adult men should be able to get their foreskin removed, for it's their free will. But parents shouldn't force their baby boys to …	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	21/02/24 05:08 AM
10	We shouldn't mock nor invalidate sexually abused men and boys - don't forget about them. How heartwarming that you understand this issue. As I earlier wrote to someone, I'm glad when the people cross the gender "aisle" and stick up for the opposite sex, like a woman caring for men's issues. Thank you. And yes, better mental heath support is paramount. Moreover, female predators should be treated seriously, like male predators. That means not lighter sentences and sick jokes about these incidents.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	21/02/24 05:03 AM
-11	We shouldn't mock nor invalidate sexually abused men and boys - don't forget about them. Yes, exactly. What's the problem? Are you sex-positive, or you have other problems with that sub?	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	21/02/24 04:56 AM
7	We shouldn't mock nor invalidate sexually abused men and boys - don't forget about them. I hope you're well now! I'm sad you weren't supported.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	21/02/24 04:49 AM
-10	We shouldn't mock nor invalidate sexually abused men and boys - don't forget about them. Well, I agree that there is some discrimination against men. Less support in case of abuse, conscription laws, longer sentences etc. But if feminism didn't exist, we would still have discrimination against women at place.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	21/02/24 04:45 AM
-37	We shouldn't mock nor invalidate sexually abused men and boys - don't forget about them. Well, feminism was net positive for the humanity. It gave women equal rights - they can work, educate, own property, vote, have equal citizenship etc. I'm adamantly opposed to patriarchy and misogyny. Having said that, I understand that some feminists can be excessively devoted to this cause and they can misinterpret any post pertaining to men's issues as "misogyny" and "derailing". But it's partly caused by anti-women MRAs. They have legitimate grievances, yet they use them to attack women, fem…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	20/02/24 10:26 PM
60	What double standards do men face? When a woman reports being a victim of violence, she is supported and nurtured. When a man reports being a victim of violence, he is invalidated, laughed at and dismissed. Women can show affection to children, even unrelated, without any backlash, meanwhile men showing affection to children are suspected to be paedophiles. In some countries, men are more often conscripted to the army, when women have a choice anyway. Some people expect men to be chivalrous: hold door for women, giving their sitt…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	19/02/24 03:52 PM
2	Any good subreddit r/LeftistMascSpace has been recently founded.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	17/02/24 09:33 AM