TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Seand0r Archive

View 4 posts and 127 comments by Seand0r on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Just go there on Gay night. Someone took us to this club called The Edge in Sao Paolo, Brazil, and it was Gay night, and the WOMEN were charged more! (Gay men's night, I guess?) Felt so great.
/r/MensRights26/06/15 05:40 AM
7

Read the comments, Paul Elam shares his thoughts. Edit: screw it, here: Well written and cogent piece, Mr. Good. Thank you. Respectfully, if I might add what I think is a missing component from the equation, Equality, as much as we can strive for it, will not be achieved by feminists and non feminists simply dropping the rope and finding mutual ground. There is a small part of what feminists assert that is on the money, though they squander that insight with an ideology that quickly takes their …
/r/MensRights07/12/14 12:57 AM
1

I appreciate a space dedicated to trying to get some dialogue going, even if you feel it's a pointless exercise. I can't remember when I last made a comment in /r/FeMRADebs , but I usually check out the threads.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 05:55 AM
2

Kelly K: Another telling line in Max’s denial is that he calls it “an awkward sexual hookup.” Max Temkin: It is entirely possible she read something completely different than I did into an awkward college hookup. ???????
/r/MensRights19/07/14 01:50 AM
3

It seems there is a wide range in what it means to be a 'professor'. Once someone is labelled a professor, it's as if anything they say is the truth and gold standard. I don't understand it when people try to claim a statistic of a crime that was not even reported. If it wasn't reported, then you have no idea if it is truthful. It never had to bear the basic standards of our legal system, so this means such claims are absolutely irrelevant.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 08:44 PM
2

Might have been a ploy to get the event cancelled, figuring the cost for hiring the police would be too great.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 08:48 PM
11

Yeah this is /tumblrinaction material rather than mensrights.
/r/MensRights29/04/14 06:54 AM
2

Sorry about that, wasn't really thinking I guess. I pulled those two comments from the /r/Bestof thread we were discussing. I'm not sure why I didn't make a top level of my own...
/r/MensRights17/04/14 04:24 AM
–

One could view it another way, that many of the so-called intactivists are causing people like this guy serious distress with a narritive of "if you're circumcised, there's something wrong with you." Now, I don't have any problem with the general principle of advocating against circumcision (though I don't agree with it personally), but if you read these people's literature and such it routinely says that circumcised guys aren't complete, aren't real men, are broken, etc. For guys with underlyin…
/r/MensRights16/04/14 08:04 PM
-1

I tend to agree, I don't like the whole 'Joe the Plumber' type events where 1 person is supposedly completely representative of the whole.
/r/MensRights13/03/14 02:27 AM
12

NPR mentioned, on the radio, that the girls were let go, towards the end of the story. The male/female aspect wasn't touched upon.
/r/MensRights27/02/14 04:49 PM
11

Nearly 17 This guy was 16 years old. Why was it phrased like that.
/r/MensRights25/02/14 08:33 PM
5

Looks like hearingaid_bot has my back on this one.
/r/MensRights24/02/14 06:37 PM
1

I'm pretty sure that's a sentence fragment you've written there. Judge not lest ye be judged.
/r/MensRights24/02/14 04:57 PM
2

I think this would be a great topic for /r/FeMRADebates
/r/MensRights13/02/14 10:31 PM
1

I think I might have to apologize, I didn't think too much before I typed that out. I thought I saw a silly generalization, but it seems it's your valid opinion. My bad.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 12:45 AM
4

Can't you see that, on a forum where gender issues are seriously discussed, throwing around, "females generally aren't funny," isn't a productive thing to say? Also, Kyle Chayka is the author of the piece originally run on Gawker, that we are discussing in this thread.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 10:46 PM
-5

What the hell is this, "female comedians generally aren't funny," bullshit? What a dumb fucking thing to say, especially on r/MensRights. You're as bad as Kyle Chayka.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 10:03 PM
1

A great model poster for anyone's uni or high scool.
/r/MensRights08/12/13 03:05 AM
3

I don't really think that's the issue here. I can see how oral sex and PIV can be considered different. Not too much of a stretch. The problem lies with placing all the burden on the man, while women are not responsible for voicing that consent on their own, or making their own decisions. If we're supposed to ask women, directly and completely unromantically, "Do you consent to sex?" What is the reason that she doesn't have to ask the same to me, either right before or after? While this redefini…
/r/MensRights10/10/13 05:03 PM
3

While the host tried his best to pathetically discredit everything she had said at the very end by claiming, "I see what you're saying, but, I don't think the patriarchy, sadly, is under threat," I was happy to see that none of them cut her off, and she was able to speak her mind. TMZ wannabes
/r/MensRights19/09/13 08:27 AM
1

Hah! Easy? The one class that covered female and LGBT studies that I took was one of, if not the most difficult class I took. To be honest it was one of my favorites, I learned a lot. It sounds like she might be stuck in her way of thinking, but at the same time she doesn't seem aggressively against what your'e saying. In fact, sounds like she's been pretty reasonable by continuing the conversation outside of class. Count yourself as lucky. Keep us posted!
/r/MensRights31/08/13 07:09 AM
5

I would not be remotely surprised if she got a great new job from someone who fully supported the things she did.
/r/MensRights08/08/13 04:45 PM
3

I am going to make it my mission to find these. I guess setting comments to Controversial is a start.
/r/MensRights05/08/13 04:46 PM
1

errr... so you did.
/r/MensRights03/08/13 05:28 PM
2

The best part is that in the second paragraph, at the very top, Emily Greenhouse mentions Men's Rights forums on Reddit. If you read through the the article entirely, there is no other mention of /r/Mensrights. Immediately after mentioning /r/MensRights, Emily starts listing off events/abuse/trolling/commenting that takes place on Twitter, Youtube, Wikipedia. Everywhere but /r/Mensrights. By placing /r/MensRights at the top, and mentioning it first, then every other negative thing she has to say…
/r/MensRights03/08/13 03:16 AM
1

I think you're too quick to attack this developer. She has given more constructive analysis and feedback in her one 6 minute youtube short than Anita has managed in all of hers combined.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 11:47 PM
2

I don't think it's that she's necessarily fooled by Sarkeesian. Anita focuses on women, and this developer happened to be one. That's why she made the short little comment about Anita being on her side. I did like the part at the end where she refutes the need for token characters, and was much more interested in gameplay. She showed she truly love playing the games for entertainment value and novelty.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 08:04 PM
1

Wow.. the disparity in this string between your and the responding posts is fascinating. I've really enjoyed reading through it all.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 07:43 AM
4

Who cares? You're definitely adding to the conversation either way. Even if you were from /r/feminism or any other sub, you were polite and honestly it's nice to see some dissenting opinions.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 05:26 AM
4

Despite the negative karma score, I just wanted to say that it was great to hear the other side of things as you presented them.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 04:12 AM
6

The court recognizes that our school district was a victim in this case,” school Superintendent Christopher J. Steinhauser told the Long Beach Press-Telegram. “This judgment demonstrates that when people attempt to defraud our school system, they will feel the full force of the law. Not a victim of Gibson, but a victim of the U.S. legal system.
/r/MensRights17/06/13 09:50 PM
1

The PM sent to you should have been a reply to your comment, and it should have ended at that. He/She basically says they disagree. So glad this isn't the status quo in /r/MensRights
/r/MensRights13/06/13 12:36 AM
1

This is totally outdated. Sex can be recreational, and only the religious would try and deny that. You cannot use my sperm without consent. Do not assume that just because I am giving off signs, and that we had sex, that I am consenting to you using my sperm. You are not entitled to have my baby. Men are strong and independent, and we demand the right to make our own decisions in regards to our body and what comes out of it.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 04:41 PM
9

This is exactly the sort of problem that does not get enough attention. Thank you for the article.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 04:24 PM
7

Me neither. I watched about 10 minutes then couldn't stand it anymore.
/r/MensRights16/05/13 08:19 AM
3

I'm not really sure what you're so worked up about, and I think you're being naive. Radicals are not mutually exclusive, and I've seen some pretty stupid and aggressive shit spouted towards outspoken feminists. Even if the men or boys (and I get the feeling it's mostly adolescent boys) aren't Men's Rights activists, the pervasive feeling is that these are males bashing feminism. What I meant to say is that there idiots representing the MRM just like there are for Feminism. I really think you cou…
/r/MensRights11/05/13 12:30 AM
0

What do you mean, in regards to this post? I was trying to highlight that we both have to deal with extremists who make either movement look bad. :FUCK FEMINISM" isn't the kind of phrase that is going to do anything for anyone.
/r/MensRights10/05/13 09:12 PM
3

I feel we have just as much to fear from the MRM extremists.
/r/MensRights10/05/13 07:33 PM
1

I would really like to see this xposted on one of the feminist subreddits, or SRS, to see what they would make of all this. Ugh, your mom is against you? Good luck
/r/MensRights07/05/13 08:15 PM
2

We don't give a shit what they think of us. They have no say in what or who we are. They are dead and meaningless. They are the enemy and will be assaulted on every plane. Fuck Feminists. This sounds a whole lot like SRS-style banter. Also, "I don't give a shit what they think of me," not, "We don't give a shit what they think of us."
/r/MensRights23/04/13 04:03 PM
7

"I think this was a witch hunt, because we are women, and that really really bugs him". What? When in the hell did this have anything to do with anyone's gender? This is about complete incompetence. They obviously don't have what it takes to successfully plan an arrest. This is probably their biggest flaw, as it all could have potentially gone down without any violence whatsoever. On top of that they don't seem to have the strength or training to take down your average criminal. You have a grip …
/r/MensRights07/04/13 03:58 AM
2

It might not be a success in your eyes, but I'm taking it one step at a time and I've informed a number of peoplel. That was the whole point of what I posted, to give my advice on how to convince the other side without alienating the moderates. I feel that many of us can relate to having this sort of discussion with a loved one or close friend only for them not to understand. This is my advice on talking to the people with who you want to get things right the first time around. I feel like it's …
/r/MensRights04/04/13 06:14 AM
4

I've talked to people close to me about the MRM-- people who hadn't heard much about the Mens Rights movement. Girlfriend, Sister, Brother, a couple friends. Everyone automatically dismissed me at first, thinking the whole Men's Rights movement was a joke, not taking it seriously. It really shows how society conditions people to ignore men's issues. I quickly learned to avoid certain topics at the onset - male rape, false rape accusations, divorce inequality, and even most legal inequalities. I …
/r/MensRights03/04/13 10:18 PM
1

I got a warning about posting top level comments in /r/AskFeminists, however I felt that was perfectly fine and warranted. It's a place to ask Feminists things. As long as I can still read what other people are posting and saying in the other subreddits, I'm fine keeping my opinion here.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 06:36 PM
1

Sorry I let my chantix rage get to me. I was stupid for not searching first, and shouldn't have blown up. By the way I'm not from /r/feminism at all, I am part of the /r/mensrights community and post here often. I guess I had a moment of stupidity.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 02:16 AM
1

apologies
/r/MensRights02/04/13 10:04 PM
1

Shut the fuck up already, I'm not a concern troll I was legitimately asking. So what if I didn't use the goddamn search before, you're still a dickhead.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 10:04 PM
1

Honestly I don't believe this is the case. No man will turn down sex just because of the chance he will be accused of rape.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 05:34 PM
2

If you are going to be so easily offended at any conversation that is sexual in nature, or has any remote connection to sexuality... first of all I pity you, as you will likely be offended every single day, probably multiple times per day. I understand the intent and purpose of calling people out on sexism. But I feel making a deal about such light 'offenses' is completely counter-productive, and makes everyone take such claims and issues much less seriously. It becomes something of a joke, as m…
/r/MensRights22/03/13 10:02 PM
6

Oh God with the amount of material we could provide the only issue you'll face is keeping within the maximum pages limit.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 05:41 PM
1

Student Support Center - then a supplemental sign underneath saying For All Genders
/r/MensRights20/03/13 05:40 PM
4

Alright, alright.. I was just trying to give her a little tiny bit of credit for actually doing something.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 01:34 AM
5

To be fair she obviously was ambitious enough to raise 150k via Kickstarter, and has successfully released her videos. Pretty far from damsel in distress if you ask me. She's not asking the internet for charity, she's successfully convincing 7000 randoms to believe in her enough to donate. While I don't agree with a lot of what she says, I still can appreciate what she's managed to make happen.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 12:39 AM
38

It's not that she's a hypocrite, she's just misinformed and does horrible research. She's trying to do something that, fundamentally, is commendable-- advocate for women. However the whole series sounds like your average undergraduate midterm paper. I felt like I was in 5th grade learning about the Hero's Journey. Unfortunately, the hordes of younguns who flood the comments section with pointless, immature bullshit completely drowns out any valid commentary. Either way, though, who really expect…
/r/MensRights18/03/13 10:37 PM
2

I think there are very few of those people in the world, honestly. The reason why this is even brought up is that there are countless young boys, pre-teens, and teenagers who don't really give a fuck, and just want to say whatever elicits a response. This is especially easy with the internet, and the result is a vocal minority making the MR movement seem violent and childish. Feminism suffers from the same thing-- there are tons of uninformed, lazy women and girls who post and say things that ma…
/r/MensRights18/03/13 09:00 PM
3

The use of the childish feminist slang, such as mansplain, immediately turns me off as well. I consider it a crutch for people who feel entitled to use the arguments other, more intellectual feminists have crafted, and these people think it's their privilege to use at will without studying the resources that would enable them to make their own arguments.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 05:33 PM
6

Thank you, Symantec/O2, for Giving me a list of Men's Right's resources
/r/MensRights14/03/13 06:59 PM
1

I'm surprised this hasn't made an appearance in any of the Feminist subreddits.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 03:13 AM
2

Exactly what I was thinking. Mobile games are not in the same class as what most would consider normal gaming. Online games is vague, so I would assume that entails facebook games. It looks like they based this on statistics that were readily and easily available, and I'd be surprised if real MMO's were really included. I don't know-- I can't find sources for their study.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 12:40 AM
2

I think I understand now, but it would help if you could provide those things that feminists say just so we know exactly what you are referring to.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 07:41 PM
1

I think the demographic aspect of your argument is the strongest. Oddly enough, when I went to find statistics, this study popped up: http://www.theesa.com/facts/pdfs/ESA_EF_2012.pdf Apparently 47% of gamers are women. Looking into the statistics, however, a few things stand out. The survey states that: "Puzzle, Board Game, Game Show, Trivia, Card Games" make up 42% of online games, and 47% of mobile games. These games are all completely gender-neutral, and the study does not seem to cover singl…
/r/MensRights12/03/13 07:35 PM
1

What are your thoughts? I can't find much about how the survey was conducted. The stats don't seem to highlight certain areas-- online and mobile games, exclusively. The "Puzzle, Board Game, Game Show, Trivia, Card Games" statistic really skews the stats, in my opinion-- not to mention they are all gender neutral.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 07:34 PM
3

Well then I think I missed it, sorry. What is he saying that contradicts his own comment?
/r/MensRights12/03/13 07:12 PM
2

Care to elaborate on that, or at the very least give some sort of explanation of what you are talking about? No one wants to read a comment whose sole purpose is to claim the previous comment is ridiculous.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 07:01 PM
3

I think some of this has to do with the notion in our society that there is no harm whatsoever in being too cautious, and that as long as things are done in the spirit of safety, or with a sense of benevolence, it cannot possibly be wrong.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 06:35 PM
10

I simply can't understand how this line of rape thinking goes this far. I understand a boyfriend or girlfriend can still be raped, but this is absolutely absurd.... boyfriends have been pleading for sex since the dawn of time, and now along with the woman holding the power over making the decision one has to be afraid of expressing desire for sex, as it makes one a rapist? I hope I can spot this type of crazy before it hits me.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 03:40 PM
1

This is the sort of thing I was talking about. "It's still true today" It may very well be, but times are very different. Women's basic rights as people were on the table then, and I wouldn't be surprised if there was a lot of resentment at that point given the state of things for the past few hundred years. You're looking at 1915 through 2013 glasses... I may be alone on this one, but I don't personally feel co-opting this scenario from the beginning of the 20th century to apply to what we talk…
/r/MensRights10/03/13 04:34 AM
-19

Honestly I think it's hard to really draw this comparison... 1915? This was 100 years ago, to try and demonize them like they were anti man or hypocrites is a far stretch.
/r/MensRights09/03/13 09:50 PM
2

How are you saying that she did this to spite him? She was fine with things being an unplanned accident, but I would feel completely different about things if I knew my SO had maliciously and secretly impregnated me (weird thinking about it like this...)
/r/MensRights08/03/13 11:04 PM
1

She lives where she has the right to choose what she does with her body, who are you to make a moral judgement that her choice is wrong?
/r/MensRights08/03/13 10:30 PM
0

Your post one purpose: making a childish comment that is not constructive in any way. Please refrain from posting unless you have something relevant, not just an blanket insult. If you want to come here to inform yourself, we're pleased to have you.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 10:24 PM
1

I wanted to ask the exact same thing. Couldn't his lawyer have come up with the exact same situation, genders reversed, and presented this to the court as some sort of precedent? Honestly I think it's a pretty fucked up thing to do on his part, but may as well be equal
/r/MensRights08/03/13 09:28 PM
-1

You're smart enough to move many of us to action. You're worthwhile enough to make a difference. What, if you had the chance, would you have one of us do?
/r/MensRights03/03/13 10:11 AM
6

Cops: nope, still not enough evidence to arrest 4 hot young girls women. They aren't attractive at all, judging by their personalities. And they aren't girls-- they're old enough to go drinking, and in their inebriated state decide it's a good idea to accuse an innocent person of rape.
/r/MensRights01/03/13 07:11 PM
1

I read through a whole host of tweets-- only found ONE tweet that slipped in: Martin trinh ‏@Trinhntonic No evidence beside her word that she was raped,honour board found the guy innocent still drags his name through mud #StandwithLanden Everyone else seems to be reading the headlines and assuming truth.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 06:30 PM
1

Admirable: Ms Gambill, a sophomore at UNC-Chapel Hill, is using her experience to help others but now she is being threatened with expulsion by school administrators http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2284562/Landen-Gambill-expelled-school-INTIMIDATED-rapist-speaking-assault.html?ito=feeds-newsxml "Admirable"? Obviously throwing away journalistic integrity for an easy-to-sell Rape Victim story is much more important than doing the right thing and withholding judgment until the facts are in,…
/r/MensRights27/02/13 05:02 PM
2

I could definitely see rape destroying someone's life, and I don't think it's based on whether they 'let it'. Do you think that after you were raped it would only make you question your masculinity if you 'let it'? That being said, I understand what you're trying to say. They're not dead, life goes on.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 04:55 PM
1

Maybe that’s reading too much into it. Who says there's no truth in this article? I knew it was there before I saw it.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 09:51 PM
3

I'm pretty sure someone else posted that here in another thread a while ago, I just always thought it was a nice, succinct answer to the whole, "Feminism is also focused on men's issues, I know it's confusing but trust us, we'll take care of you guys as well. But before we do, we have to take care of one thing first-- feminism."
/r/MensRights25/02/13 05:47 PM
19

That's because all you've seen is the male stereotypes-- firefighters, soldiers, businessmen. There are no examples of strong Wikipedia-editor role models available to you.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 05:37 PM
2

Exactly. I'm sure we could cherry pick a few soundbites or audio clips from the UoT protest and use those to make all Feminists seem like absolute psychos.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 05:02 PM
3

That, and there is more that I garnered from actually listening to that UoT speech. Some early research of his, which covered the topic of incest, is used out of context to make it seem like he supports incest.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 05:00 PM
11

"Expressio unius est exclusio alterius" - "Expressed mention of one thing implicitly excludes all others"
/r/MensRights25/02/13 04:57 PM
4

Don't be too quick to blame her unconditionally, but definitely consider the advice everyone else here is giving. My mother went through the same sort of thing. It sounds like she's bi-polar, which isn't something she can necessarily control. If she's drinking, then it will definitely be much worse. There is medication which can help a lot, but convincing someone to take them is a different story. She obviously sees there's something wrong as she's committing herself, which is fantastic. You may…
/r/MensRights22/02/13 07:21 PM
2

wwwwwwwwwwwoooops. Yes, that is what I meant.
/r/MensRights22/02/13 02:43 PM
14

You seem to have a loving relationship with your wife, who is dominant during sex. I think we should send you over to /r/Shitredditsays simply to scare the shit out of them.
/r/MensRights22/02/13 01:28 AM
10

/r/stopsmoking. See you there.
/r/MensRights22/02/13 01:23 AM
3

I'm sorry officer, I didn't mean to grab your crotch. Please go arrest that goddamned bartender-- he's the one who allowed me to do this!
/r/MensRights19/02/13 04:09 AM
4

It's worse than that. They don't explicitly say that it will be rape. They're saying, "Hey, we can't and won't deny that sex often happens while intoxicated, and realistically that's acceptable, and you can continue doing so. We will put forth, in the vaguest, most indefinable and unrealistic way possible, our soft position on intoxicated sex... And whenever we want to, we'll arrest you for rape."
/r/MensRights19/02/13 04:07 AM
4

This is fucking sickening. This doesn't even have to be a male/female issue. Someone deliberately lied, the court acknowledges this, yet is somehow unable to rectify the issue. INSANITY!
/r/MensRights15/02/13 07:00 PM
1

Don't worry. I was in Brazil, me and the girl ended up going to a club on Gay night-- women had to pay $15 while men were free. Made me feel so fuckign good.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 10:30 PM
2

MRs Men are the new Nazis FTFY
/r/MensRights23/01/13 03:40 PM
3

I might be late to the party, but... Isn't the name itself the first indication? It's hard to believe that VAWA pertains to both genders equally when the title of the law solely emphasizes Women. Why change the gender-neutral title of Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act in order to emphasize one specific gender?
/r/MensRights13/01/13 09:11 PM
2

My first instinct with stuff like this is immediately to downvote.... but then I realize it needs to be upvoted for visibility!
/r/MensRights30/12/12 06:18 AM
1

I did see those after the fact, reading through all the comments...
/r/MensRights14/12/12 04:13 AM
1

I noticed that too. I gave up any thought of commenting a few seconds into reading the comments-- there would simply be no point in trying to start any sort of discussion. Seems most of you realized this as well. Funnily enough, they seemed to think that this lack of counter-arguments from MR advocates was complete validation of everything that was said...
/r/MensRights14/12/12 03:15 AM
2

If anyone knows of any prominent MRM websites like these I would love to take a look.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 03:03 AM
3

Feminism: "Organized activity on behalf of women's rights and interests" You can't have your cake and eat it too.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 02:53 AM
1

One theme I ALWAYS see repeated in the various anti-MRA pieces I read is that we're hateful, anti-women, make death threats-- generally that we only spew nonsensical hate as opposed to valid discussion. WHERE IS THIS HATE? I NEVER see any sort of anti-women drivel on this subreddit. All the discussion is purposeful, and if there is an idiot who posts something sexist, or doesn't add to the conversation, they are downvoted, and generally not tolerated.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 10:27 PM
3

At the very least, if there is a reasonable amount of public discussion about a certain member's shadowban.... then it's no longer in the shadows, and reasons should be given if the community requests
/r/MensRights07/12/12 04:16 PM
1

Wow. A couple posts down, and I just can't believe people say this: "I really feel like we just need to go out and torture/murder men. Not men who are not yet rapists, but those who commit the crimes. This means varying degrees of cat calling, sexual harassment, rape, pedophilia, etc. We need a matriarchy. If fear is instilled in men, they will learn to keep their small, pornsick dicks in their pants. Men need to fear us."
/r/MensRights30/11/12 08:07 PM
-2

Saying stuff like this really doesn't help outsiders take MR seriously
/r/MensRights29/11/12 06:47 PM
1

It's somewhat hard to comprehend, and try to understand the position all this opposition is coming from. I'm trying to understand it as a valid argument, but I simply cannot find one there. There is no good reason to be so staunchly opposed to a Men's Center!
/r/MensRights13/11/12 03:03 PM
2

Thank you for working to ensure that we have an informed and productive forum for discussion. I cringe, often in confusion, whenever I read that /r/MensRights is a place only for hate speech and mindless hatemongering. Although I don't agree with this at all, I do understand that these stories and articles can give the wrong impression, and lead to unproductive discussion.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 08:29 PM
1

Sarcasm aside, I was really curious as to whether anyone was able to achieve getting an actual male-oriented course added to the curriculum-- be it a UC, CalState, or any other recognizable institution.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 08:17 PM
2

Do any UC schools have some sort of Male-oriented gender studies courses?
/r/MensRights09/11/12 05:36 PM
2

I would think that it's not one or the other... but a combination of both societal and biological, no?
/r/MensRights09/11/12 05:35 PM
36

You must be kidding me... This has to be an article from the Onion or something...
/r/MensRights09/11/12 04:40 PM
1

Oh oh oh! I want another rebuttal, this is interesting.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 08:07 PM
0

? Sorry, I missed it.
/r/MensRights01/11/12 07:09 PM
3

Well, the authorities don't seem to respond to, "If he can play, then I should be able to as well," as opposed to, "Well if I can't play, then he shouldn't be able to either."
/r/MensRights01/11/12 06:19 PM
13

What would he do, report them for hate speech?
/r/MensRights01/11/12 02:51 PM
42

I agree. In my opinion, there is plenty of rational discourse in MRM.. I think every day how much I appreciate all the links to articles, and reading and being involved in commenting. Sure, we could be better- but I'm happy with all the interesting things I learn and read here.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 02:26 PM
1

Point taken. I guess I've seen too many instantaneous "Lawyer Up" comments on Reddit in general. This makes me think of that. Child Protective Services Up!
/r/MensRights23/10/12 07:57 PM
6

I'm sorry, but sometimes I feel redditors jump a lil bit too quickly to escalate the situation. Sure, you might have a headache, but that doesn't mean you're about to have a stroke. She grounded him-- I think that's a long way from emotional and psychological abuse.
/r/MensRights23/10/12 03:49 PM
3

You know the answer already, that's why you've asked this question so many times in this thread alone. Don't stoop to their level. The goal is to stop the Doxxing, not fuel a doxxing war. Hell, I'm a pretty reasonable guy, but I like to speak my mind. I don't want to have to stop posting here, or on Reddit in general because all of a sudden a certain subset of people feel justified in spending the copious amounts of free time they possess in order to "bring me to justice".
/r/MensRights19/10/12 09:34 PM
7

Signed
/r/MensRights26/09/12 03:08 PM
5

Wow! It's hard to believe (well, maybe not...) that people can be so opposed to reasonable conversation-- and it's not like r/MensRights forces its view on anyone, we're just here to learn and discuss-- that they will attempt to shut down our forum of free discussion. I really like /mensrights because instead of focusing on woman-bashing, it's about highlighting men's issues. Not defamatory, simply informative!
/r/MensRights20/09/12 03:38 PM
2

Our only defense...
/r/MensRights28/08/12 12:15 AM
2

Time to start flying American Airlines and Virgin America, it seems
/r/MensRights18/08/12 06:39 AM
-2

While I agree with the MRM, I don't feel what you wrote there will spark any sort of intelligent discussion. You completely overgeneralize, and bash American women at every angle. I completely understand what you are saying, I just don't feel you put it in a very productive way. EDIT: I'm assuming here that you're the first response... Dble EDIT: I'm sorry, thought you were that first post. Yours was much more eloquent.
/r/MensRights10/08/12 03:23 PM
-6

Props on making your cakeday post something meaningful, rather than kittens.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 08:31 PM
1

OIB - Overly Insistent Boyfriend, the next big thing in Memes
/r/MensRights27/07/12 04:57 PM
5

I don't understand why this post was downvoted. The post was appropriate, intelligent, and grammatically correct. There is nothing offensive about it, the post simply seems to disagree with the general sentiment found on MensRights lately... We need more of this kind of discussion, please do not scare it away. Edit: It seems like Benocrates is getting blanket downvotes. This is just silly.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 03:02 PM
1

Sickening! She is a pedophile-- as a man she would go to jail for years, have her life ruined, not be able to get a job-- all this if she lived through the jail time, as the one thing convicts hate more than anything else is child molesters (even if they are criminals themselves...)
/r/MensRights25/07/12 05:20 PM
3

|She can lose custody of her children as custody is awarded to the abuser. She can have a cruel distortion campaign launched against her, which separates her from friends and family, often her sole support system. Awarded to the ABUSER, eh? Yeah, this piece is a joke that only reflects the writer's frustration stemming from her own personal experience.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 05:00 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter