TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SeaworthinessSea2407 Archive

View 0 posts and 328 comments by SeaworthinessSea2407 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

Alot of people are just homophobic and biphobic
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 05:12 PM
2

Does not matter nor was that part of my point. He killed because of his deep hatred for women. He killed men that he saw as better at attracting women than him. I don't care how many men or women he killed. The point is that he is an example of a man not taking rejection well and OP is content to just gloss over that because some women can't handle rejection
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 02:40 AM
1

So if it doesn't happen that often and you have no source, you can't really make any statement about things "averaging out" sorry ligma
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 12:37 AM
0

if averaged out, do take rejection worse regularly Oh so you have an actual source for this? Or is it just your anus?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 10:36 PM
0

Side note: “Ligma” balls. Nah I'm good. I'd rather not have crabs in my mouth
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 10:34 PM
2

Yeah the number for partner violence or sexual assault for women is 1 in 4 (or even 1 in 3). This is from the WHO, which is a reputable source despite whatever contrarian nitpicking you may partake in about it. What this means is that women are twice to three times as likely to experience partner violence or sexual assault as men, and the perpetrators are overwhelmingly men. I see why you choose to omit this because it completely invalidates your point once again
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 10:03 PM
1

I’m stating how women have this mindset that every single man they reject or say no to suddenly have violent or aggressive tendencies when in reality majority of men don’t even care. That's not what anybody is saying. But because it happens often enough, yes there is some precaution there. But nobody is saying "all men are violent" that's a strawman. As for when you glossed over violence, yeah you've made repeated comments attempting to separate the violent instances from the rest as though it d…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 10:00 PM
1

Yes, that's exactly what OP is saying. You're understanding that correctly. OP is exercising a double standard, while also attempting to gloss over the men who get violent due to rejection
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 09:09 PM
2

Source trust me bro?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 09:06 PM
2

Supreme Gentleman? More like Supreme Delusion
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 08:52 PM
1

But how's that worked out for you? Great, actually. I'm in the best relationship I've ever been in and my girlfriend and I live together and are soon celebrating our 2nd anniversary. It is precisely because I don't tolerate stupid "tests" that I got here. It's pretty easy to find genuine people when you actually weed out nonsense
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 08:49 PM
0

Yeah this has nothing to do with the actual conversation
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 08:46 PM
9

Yes because Alek Minassian famously handled rejection so well (/s) He didn't reduce himself to making shitty remarks. Instead he checks notes RAN PEOPLE OVER WITH A TRUCK.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 08:06 PM
4

The chuds are allergic to reality unfortunately
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 08:04 PM
10

You're glossing over violence in favor of rude acts. Do you think a woman acting a little bitchy over being rejected is worse than a man physically harming or killing a women or multiple women due to rejection? If yes, your entire point is invalid. If no, then that tells us all we need to know about you
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 08:03 PM
–

Would women start committing violent murderous rampages? No, they wouldn't. I guess I shouldn't be surprised given your username that you think people like Elliot Rodger were justified
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 07:43 PM
3

Don't forget about the supreme pubestain Elliot Rodger. Yeah that's real inconvenient for OPs stupid point
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 07:41 PM
11

Lemme guess. You're glossing over the copious amount of bodily harm women incur from men they reject because that would defeat your whole point. Oh what about people like Elliot Rodger? I bet he handled rejection like a CHAMP right?? Women definitely go out and shoot up frat houses when they're rejected right??? Right???? No, they don't. There are countless stories of women being harmed, maimed or killed for rejecting men. Then you have the Elliot Rodgers and Alek Minassians of the world. Pieces…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 07:29 PM
1

This feels like the same kind of argument used to justify shit tests, which actually serve no constructive purpose and are just shitty behavior. Which, so is someone responding to a moment of vulnerability with "jabs". That is not the action of a suitable partner. No, the real show of strength is to not tolerate shitty and manipulative behavior at all. As for your drivel about "allowed emotions" if you are not "allowed" to express certain emotions in a relationship, the person you're dating is a…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 07:23 PM
–

I quoted your point to you and you're denying it. No wonder the mods axed your post
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 04:11 PM
–

Your point is that "most people in committed relationships retain backup options" what part of that isn't a general statement about people unfaithful?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 12:55 PM
5

You can be imperfect while also being faithful. People not being faithful might be a norm in your life but that doesn't mean it is in general, which seems like the point you are making
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 03:20 AM
6

No, not at all. Most people in my life that are partnered are only committed to their significant others, myself included. No side-flings, no extra shit. None of that garbage
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 02:31 AM
7

I relate to that but if that new person and I are over, I'm going right back to who's left on social media. So you cycle back to people you used to date therefore "most" do
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 01:39 AM
9

"Most people" do this? Really? With what evidence do you make this claim?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 01:37 AM
–

You speak about the manosphere as though it's a trivial thing but we get incels from there who have gone on to commit violent rampages against women. We also get things like that "online rape academy." So do you believe things like this do not matter, did not happen or are justified?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/26 01:49 PM
–

"Women should pity date men who are struggling to give them experience" Why should they? What's in it for them. Dating is supposed to be mutually beneficial is it not? You're not beating the incel-adjacent reputation that this sub has
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/26 01:01 AM
1

So yeah your proof is "trust me broooooo" and thus I am not going to take you seriously
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/26 04:08 PM
1

I know what averages are. You still need to provide actual data in order to claim you know anything about the experiences of the "average man" or "average woman"
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/26 11:13 PM
1

Again with the "averages" do you actually have proof? Averages are quantifiable. You are talking out of your ass
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/26 10:54 PM
1

Average huh? You have stats to actually prove this since you're throwing around statistics terms? Or does "average" mean "I've seen this personally" and the proof is "trust me brooooooo"
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/26 10:44 PM
2

So is yours. Which was my point that you seem to not understand
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/26 07:52 PM
1

My take was that yours isn't universally true. "We" don't all know 20 year olds that are more mature than 35 year olds.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/26 07:49 PM
3

Explain what exactly? That your anecdotal experience isn't the same as everyone elses?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/26 07:48 PM
2

If you were 17 and 13 when you got together that would be weird. If you're 24 and 20 then it's not. I stated a similar thing somewhere else in the thread though (35/20 being weird but 55/40 not) and got some moral crusader on my ass abt it because all relationships must fit their specific standards, nuance and context be damned
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/26 07:07 PM
2

there's honestly no point arguing against takes with zero nuance when they're also entirely subjective on top of that. Yeah unfortunately that is most of the takes on here. But you're 100% correct. Age is NOT the only determinent of life stage. To suggest it is is to flatten the discussion and also then deem a large swath of relationships as creepy or wrong for not fitting some arbitrary but specific parameter
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/26 06:50 PM
3

How do the differences between a 40 year old and a 55 year old create a power imbalance? You just saying they do doesn't make it so. I'm almost 40 and have had age gap relationships in the past. Perhaps my lived experiences gives me insights that yours doesn't. 🤷 Or you're treating your own lived experiences as axiomatic truths while dismissing anyone else who doesn't agree
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/26 06:06 PM
3

How does this translate to power imbalance in the relationship? Not different workloads or expectations. Power imbalance. That is literally the only reason why an age gap would be creepy at all. It may matter to you, but as you said you have no authority on the matter and I simply don't agree with you. If you want to shame me for that it's your prerogative, I'm neither 40 nor in a relationship with any meaningful gap. But if you can't answer my question about the power imbalance then I don't hav…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/26 05:57 PM
2

There are plenty of 40 year olds that aren't new parents. If you become a parent at 27 or 28 (which is very normal btw) then you're a parent of a teenager in your 40s. Which makes that difference moot. People also peak in their careers earlier or later and that doesn't really matter unless they work together. Who cares if one is at their career peak and the other is past it? What does that discrepancy actually amount to in terms of power imbalance in a relationship?The difference between a 40 ye…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/26 05:50 PM
4

Do we? Pretty much all of the people I know that are 35 are more mature and settled than I am and I'm 27. And I definitely know more 35 year olds than 20 year olds because the former are in a more similar place in life to me than the latter
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/26 05:43 PM
0

No it isn't. At both of those ages people are generally established in their careers, they're likely married already/parents. They're not in different stages of their lives. 40 is not that young, 55 is not that old. They're both middle age. What isn't weird then? What is your cutoff since you seem to claim authority on this?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/26 05:41 PM
5

I don't even consider that an age gap. You're in the same stage of life. People get married and have kids at 26 and 27 (and 30) and that's totally normal. If anyone thinks your relationship is inappropriate they're being ridiculous
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/26 05:35 PM
7

Yeah that's fine. I don't personally ever date much younger than I am, my current relationship is my largest "gap" and it's 2.5 years between my girlfriend and I. But your friend is 27, she's an adult as well and I'm not going to infantilize a 27 year old. I'm also 27
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/26 05:28 PM
7

Well yeah, of course bluepill seems like an ideological mess relative to redpill because redpill is a specific ideology. Bluepill essentially means "not redpill". I think the pill thing is overly reductionist so I put my flare as no pill. But by and large I disagree with and dislike redpill and think many of it's supporters are chuds. So, naturally, they'd label me bluepill even though there are so-called bluepillers I disagree with, dislike and think are chuds as well
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/26 05:23 PM
3

Also how old are they? That matters as well. It's not just "age gap equals creepy"
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/26 05:17 PM
2

The age gap thing depends on context. If it's a 35 year old and a 20 year old that's weird. They're not in the same place in life and the 35 year old has life experience the 20 year old does not. Notice how I am not specifying gender here. A 55 year old and a 40 year old is not weird. They're both well established adults and middle aged. Some people get mad about age gaps of less than 10 or even 5 years, but again the actual ages of the people matter. 16 and 21 is creepy AND illegal. 21 and 26 i…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/26 05:14 PM
10

Is the concept of nuance foreign to this sub? It seems like everything posted here just aims to treat everyone as monoliths and everything as more rigid than it actually is. Even in this post you rely on assumptions that don't cover everything (men work grueling hours, women get utility from that. Women also work, single income households are getting rarer by the day) Yes, some women ARE bad people. Evil in fact. This is true. Anyone who tries to justify it are just as bad as the people who just…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/26 02:04 PM
–

There are certainly a subsection of men that do this, but just as women are not a monolith neither are men. There are a good amount of men that are not having children until they are financially/emotionally ready to do so
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/26 01:45 PM
1

You seem to like it insofar as it gives you the ability to treat men as less monolithic than women. Even though your point is invalidated by the study that you cited. Yet another post made here to bitch about women that is self-invalidating
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/26 07:20 PM
1

I was going to talk about how the stats in the study YOU cited show negligible variability differences between the sexes but someone already beat me to it. This post is just another excuse to complain about women. How very manly of you indeed
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/26 07:08 PM
1

Yes it does. People have different reasons for doing this and you can simply not date someone if you have an issue. I would NEVER wait six months to have sex. My solution to this is not dating someone with that particular boundary. Not writing a soliloquy on reddit about it
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/26 01:06 PM
–

Personally no. I could not function in that kind of a dynamic
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 03:34 PM
0

So explain why I, an autistic man, am literally lying in bed in my girlfriend right now?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 03:19 PM
3

Women categorize men in their lives as friends or as romantic prospects. Please explain how this is any different than men doing the exact same thing regarding the women in their lives. Women absolutely have to do/say the right things for men to be turned on. Sexual compatibility flows both ways. Also what is your point? That women are too choosy or that men are sex-crazed neanderthals?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 03:16 PM
2

Again, source?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 10:38 PM
4

Kids are supposed to be raised by their parents. Men with primary custody get a village. Women with primary custody get zilch. Source on this? Lemme guess: "Trust me broooooo"
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 10:33 PM
14

You are quite literally making the point that men should have primary custody by default because they are more likely to be able to outsource the work involved to other women. You're literally undermining your own point by saying women are better at childrearing than men. That would logically mean women should get primary custody by default
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 10:18 PM
3

On the surface, it seems like obvious common sense. Women cook, clean, plan, organize, and fret about daily details more than their male significant others. Then there's the additional premise that, in recent decades, women ALSO work to contribute income for the household. Men don't even attempt to deny any of these modern realities/roles. So women tend to do domestic labor more than men, and also work. You admit this to be the case and then go on to try and explain how it isn't. If women and me…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 11:59 PM
–

So the average man is 5'9 or so. A 6'2 and up requirement excludes 96.1% of the male population. All you have to do is go outside and people watch to see that this doesn't make sense mathematically, far more people are coupled up than would be if only 3.9% of men were partnered As for 8" size, im not searching that on my work computer for obvious reason, but considering average length is between 5"-6" you can probably figure that again the math isn't mathing. Regarding genes and pretty privilege…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 02:14 PM
6

Well at least you provided something to examine. OP so far has been unable to. Why don't you read the section about Leta Hollingworth and her studies regarding the hypothesis. Or the modern ones, which produce varying results, pointing to either greater male variability, greater female variability, or a negligible difference in variability. As usual with this sub, people take really complex and nuanced topics that are not fully understood and try to oversimplify them to prove some kind of axiom
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 12:16 AM
3

And which specific writings by Charles Darwin talk about the hypothesis OP mentions? Saying "b-b-but Charles Darwin y chromosome" isn't good enough
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/26 11:32 PM
6

You SAY that the data points to this supposed "Greater Male Variability Hypothesis" but you do not actually provide any data nor the names of anyone involved with this hypothesis. I could just as easily say that men tend to be angrier and more egotistical than women, say that the bell curve is steeper without providing a shred of evidence and call it the "Greater Male Ego Hypothesis" and just expect you to take my word for it while I use it as a perpetual gotcha. That's what you are doing here
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/26 11:03 PM
–

Reported for Spam
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 08:27 PM
2

Reported for minor abuse and sexualization
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 08:04 PM
1

Likewise on the no complaints. I was merely pointing out that this is not a universal experience like OP was trying to make it seem
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 07:50 PM
–

Cry about it I guess?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 07:42 PM
–

He'd probably say he "didn't consent to that" either. This guy's a chud
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 07:24 PM
–

Yeah it's you. Why don't you try jerking off before you go out in public if you're this pent up all the time
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 07:22 PM
8

You're not emphasizing anything except your own warped beliefs about sexuality and bodily autonomy.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 06:29 PM
4

Yeah but they're not. Bikinis are swim wear. And most coffee shops people are not wearing athleisure wear that's super revealing either. At least not where I live
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 06:27 PM
10

Are you a religious fanatic or something? Your mind isn't being "raped" because you saw a woman in public and thought she was hot. Your lustful thougts are your own, and again are a normal part of being human. If they're causing you this much shame and distress that's what a shrink is for. But expecting women you literally have ZERO interaction with who don't even know you to cover up so you don't have to deal with the shame of finding them attractive is absolute DELUSION
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 06:25 PM
3

I was gonna say, even in places like Venice (California) that would literally be specific coffee kiosks right next to the beach
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 06:21 PM
5

Not how it works. You don't decide what women get to wear. Also where the hell are you going that women are wearing bikinis in a coffee shop?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 06:19 PM
10

visually attacking my brain Yeah this sounds like it's above reddit's paygrade. Women don't have to police themselves around you because you can't handle thinking someone is hot. No one is "attacking your brain" visual or otherwise. You are ashamed of what is a normal human response (thinking someone is attractive when you see them) and blame women for this discomfort. That's a you issue and you should probably talk about that with a professional
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 06:18 PM
5

Yeah that's true. I do my best not to make people uncomfortable and feel very guilty if I ever do so I often assume that's the default mindset. Some of the chuds on here definitely prove it's not though unfortunately
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 06:13 PM
1

Yep. Makes perfect sense. There is nothing hypocritical about what you said (and since people on here love to be sarcastic with zero indication of such, I'll reiterate that I am 100% serious)
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 06:09 PM
12

It literally isn't though. Liking something that's done with consent vs disliking something done without consent is perfectly consistent and logical. There is nothing hypocritical about this nor is it difficult to understand
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 06:05 PM
20

Well yeah no shit sherlock! Women (and men) like to be sexualized when they are consenting. This isn't some gotcha
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 05:54 PM
2

No they don't. They're a pedantic, gish galloping troll who cannot back their shit up at all. Chances are, any research they do use will actually debunk their own points
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 05:34 PM
2

Women need emotional validation. One begets the other. So wouldn't a lack of this also negate the relationship? Or are we just baselessly justifying double standards?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 05:15 PM
0

Yeah that is foolish on their part. Sex is very much an important part of most committed relationships but it's not the only important thing or even the most important
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 05:11 PM
1

Sex is absolutely an important part of a committed relationship. It is not the only part of it
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 05:08 PM
2

Well established by whom? With what credentials. What are experts (names, research, evidence) saying to back that up? Failure to respond results in you forfeiting the right to be taken seriously
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 05:04 PM
20

I notice you choose to treat women as a monolith here but distinguish between men who "just want sex" and other men (you also put the latter category down but that's a different issue). Did you at any point when making this post think that maybe the women who are mad at men who just want sex and the women who are having casual sex are not one and the same?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 10:10 PM
-2

This post is AI slop. Your responses are quite literally cut and paste. I'm reporting you
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/26 02:43 PM
5

Which is exactly what my girlfriend and I did
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/26 01:46 PM
6

I am definitely all for treating. I am also looking for reciprocity. Biology may dictate that men have to jump through the hoops (which paying for a nice date while having effort reciprocated is not), but we're obviously more than that. Also, in case any chuds get any ideas, "reciprocity" does not mean "getting laid specifically because I paid for a date" FWIW, My girlfriend and I agreed to go dutch on our first date and now take turns treating each other or split costs. Because again, reciproci…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/26 12:59 PM
0

I don't fuckin know. There are all kinds of reasons. Some women could need specific foreplay, some of the men involved might just suck in bed or be selfish, there could be disorders or imbalances involved, anxiety. This list is not all-inclusive. This is another very multi-faceted, nuanced topic that people on here try to oversimplify and boil down to one simple cause or another across the board
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/26 10:00 PM
4

Nice humblebrag. Women also can orgasm more and longer than men during any particular encounter. Almost like male and female orgasms are different and serve different purposes biologically speaking
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/26 09:55 PM
2

Logically I know they’re different situations You answered your own question. They're different situations. She's probably being more intentional about intimacy than she was previously. So, even though she may not regret her previous encounter, she still wants to slow it down a bit. And that's fine. If you're not a fan then find someone who's more on your speed
/r/seduction18/06/26 09:14 PM
-2

I'm glad it is, because murder and date rape are two outcomes of going on a date that women have to keep in mind. Also, with the current resurgence of male chauvinism and women's rights under attack now moreso than 20 years ago is it really any shock women are being more selective on who they date/sleep with/etc? We have men out here actively cheering for the loss of bodily autonomy.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 02:06 PM
6

I'm glad it is, because murder and date rape are two outcomes of going on a date that women have to keep in mind. Also, with the current resurgence of male chauvinism and women's rights under attack now moreso than 20 years ago is it really any shock women are being more selective on who they date/sleep with/etc? We have men out here actively cheering for the loss of bodily autonomy.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 02:04 PM
1

No it's not. It's literally just being kind
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 07:53 PM
7

That's WORSE. Being broke and trying your best is far more commendable than being well off and selfish. So again, my question stands
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 05:03 PM
3

So how do you expect to cohabitate if you're stingy with money? And if you are unable to cohabitate that will make it harder to get dates in general since many people evaluate long term potential
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 05:01 PM
14

It's literally OPs revenge fantasy bc he got rejected by a woman his age so he dreams od the day where he can reject them for someone younger and hotter
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 04:58 PM
3

And yet Tom Holland (another Spiderman) is married to Zendaya irl so......
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 04:54 PM
17

You clearly view yourself as the "spiderman" in this case. You're aware that Rocky, Bond, and Spiderman are fictional characters yes? As in they're not representative of typical people. Your post reads like you're bitter about getting rejected, so you're fantasizing about the future when you're "better" and then women your age who will obviously be older will want you but you'll reject them for younger women. This is a petty revenge fantasy. Also, by the way. I'm a HUGE nerd, and I am in a great…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 03:49 PM
11

Judging by OPs replies to you, they're a bad faith troll and forfeit any right to be taken seriously
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 07:44 PM
16

Do you have evidence that a statistically significant amount of women think this way. Or are you just seeing TikTok brain rot or redpill tatebro bullshit and believing it blindly?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 07:43 PM
1

You frame this as a debate but you're not acting in good faith. You create an irrefutable premise that feminist women who do call out other women for problematic/toxic behavior are just providing lip service. Ergo they can never be trusted. You want to harm the interests of women and infringe on their rights and protections because you hate women and you want to collectively punish all of them for feminism because feminism is the reason why women do not have to be subservient to men and dependen…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 07:19 PM
36

Men have killed women due to misogyny. Enough to make it statistically significant. Sorry, but you are just objectively incorrect
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 06:59 PM
–

My girlfriend respects you times a million (this is a direct quote) for using this asshole's playbook against him (also a direct quote). Put this chud in his place (that's from me)
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 05:18 AM
–

I have two toxic ex girlfriends. They are responsible for their behavior and ONLY their behavior. It would be foolish of me as a man to then ascribe their behavior to "women" rather than figure out why I ended up in back to back toxic relationships (which is what I did). I agree with you that OPs post is out of line. But I don't think that toxic individuals that happen to be women reflect poorly on women as a whole. Just as chuds like OP do not reflect poorly on all men
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 10:47 PM
–

Thank you. Yeah I don't really understand what their point is, other than "find the nearest feminist and be as much of a chauvinistic douchebag as possible. Because winning"
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 08:18 PM
–

How old are you? Genuinely it sounds you're a teenager. Why are you so concerned with "winning" when your life would be far more peaceful without this petty pissing match you're partaking in. And how far does this go? Do you feel it is your duty to go out of your way to antagonize feminists? Because if so, you're not some culture warrior. You're just being a douchebag
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 08:14 PM
21

If someone is committed to hating me because I am a man, I will simply not deal with them if I don't have any obligation to (work, etc). Why even bother engaging with someone you think is acting in bad faith? (Also feminists are not a monolith and most of them are not abusive or cruel to men)
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 07:58 PM
–

This post is AI slop and I think that's all that need be said, however I'll respond anyway. Hollywood makes entertainment. All of those movies are Californication. What they are not is a template or representation of real life romantic and/or relationships
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 06:42 PM
13

Ah yes because nothing says "success with women" quite like checks notes not caring about their rights. Rights which are actively in peril now, more so than any time in the last 20 years or more. Rights which men in power seek to and are attempting to legislate away. Bodily autonomy that is being infringed upon by the government. It's no wonder women in general are more militantly feminist now. That's generally the consequence of attempting to return to a society where they are second class citi…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/26 06:27 AM
7

Creating an awkward or uncomfortable situation specifically to see how the person reacts. This includes negging within its purview
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 01:44 AM
–

Nope. I'm not going to sacrifice the love in my life. Never going to happen and other people's love lives or lack thereof are not my concern
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 08:18 AM
1

I don't know how many more times you need to hear this but if you're being a hateful jackass, you will be called out for your hateful jackassery. That is consequence. If you want to argue that this is some unfair "taboo" go right ahead. It doesn't change the fact that your actions have consequences
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 04:21 PM
-1

taboo in place. Tell that to the myriad of men online who say that insert specfic woman here is for the streets. Accompanied by the circle jerk of other men agreeing. No, there is not a "taboo" in place. You're just getting pushback for saying inflammatory shit. And newsflash, making blanket negative statements about women as a whole is misogynistic. Women (like men) are not a monolith. Are you saying that there is also a taboo against making statements which are unflattering to men as a group? …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 04:06 PM
–

Or she has a different view of sex than you do. Men and women both hold off on sex for various reasons. Religion being 1, trauma being another, being on the ace spectrum, medical conditions, or even just wanting an exclusive relationship before sex. (Having dabbled in casual, this is now my boundary and it worked out fine for me because my girlfriend and I hit it off immediately and knew we wanted to be exclusive). There are other reasons as well that aren't "she's stringing you along." You're a…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 03:45 PM
0

I don't think they leave their mom's basement much
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 02:26 PM
3

Yeah this applies to governments censoring people. Not redditors getting banned by mods for breaking whatever arbitrary rules they have or someone saying "aLl WoMeN aRe CoWaRdS" online and getting pushback from other users. Just having the legal right to say something inflammatory doesn't free you from the consequences of doing so.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 02:26 PM
8

Freedom of speech is not freedom from consequence. Also it's generally considered ignorant and bad faith to make blanket statements about entire groups of people because they are not monoliths
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 12:40 PM
2

I really hate when girls do this. Getting assaulted and killed by other men does not invalidate the assaults or homicides. I'm a man. It's in my flair. If you can't even bother to read that then you're not worth debating
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 02:15 AM
4

Sexual freedom is only given to the man who are the the top of the attractive totem pole which is in most men Sexual freedom is not the same as availability of sex. Sexual freedom is the ability to consent or not. Not having sex available to you is not an infringement upon any right. Being sexually assaulted however is, where then its do victims have recourse Less danger is a relative because men don't deal with as much danger when it comes to their partners but they do have to deal with heavy a…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 02:07 AM
1

Ok so you were definitely just rejected by a woman. Or you hate your sister and feel emasculated by her. I'll ask my psych degree-having smart independent girlfriend what complex this may be
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 10:24 PM
10

So you gloss over sexual freedom, less danger and not giving birth as though they're not major things and act like having to plan dates and be the "seducer" are? Gimme a break
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 10:19 PM
6

Yeah this REEKS of resentment. Sometimes people in general try dating and realize they don't have the bandwidth for something more serious. Some people just want sex. Some are in fact never going to be ready for a relationship with you. This is also not a women specific thing, men do it too. I've had your exact experience being told by women I've dated that they're not ready for a relationship and then soon after they are in one. You know what I did in response? Moved on. If someone didn't wanna…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 08:23 PM
7

If you're happy with that great. Then sleeping with someone else wouldn't be considered cheating. But your scenario involves a good faith discussion and agreement, not just one person deciding to cheat instead of leave
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 02:37 PM
0

So break up. Cheating makes you a chud
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 02:29 PM
2

If someone firmly decides to never sleep with you again, are they your sex partner? No so you break up
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 02:00 PM
1

No, the amount of casual sex a man has is not an indicator of success. I don't care what the manosphere grifters say, they are liars who sell you this shit for profit
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 04:18 AM
1

society can have 100% bodily autonomy and 0% entitlement - which I support - and still face a systemic crisis if it doesn't address how to integrate a massive demographic of unselected men. Interpersonal relationships are based on freedom of choice. We can give these men all the tools possible to succeed and it still doesn't guarantee anything. I'm honestly confused what your gripe is. You claim this is an extinction event because these "unselected men" cannot reproduce. But then you propose des…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 03:13 AM
1

All of this pontificating because yes, you are mad that you cannot get laid. The reason it is natural selection is because people have standards. You have to be appealing enough to someone to have sex with them. And because women have far more physical risk from it than men do, women are more likely to be selective about it. Women also depend less on a man for survival so the result of that is again that you have to be appealing to someone to have sex with them. I'm not sure what you think the s…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 02:21 AM
0

Natural Selection. If you can't get laid, you can't reproduce. This is not a mass extinction event. This is literally just survival of the fittest. Imagine being so mad at not getting laid you declare it a mass extinction event
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 02:38 AM
1

Your opinion that you fail to back up. Why should anyone listen to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/26 08:21 PM
0

The average straight guy has 6 or 7 sexual partners in their lifetime. If you're so sure that guys should fuck around casually before entering a committed relationship what is your magic cutoff where these men achieve this feeling of desirability? And really, selling your soul? How old are you? Sex is not the end all be all for self-worth and if you think it is you probably need to stop watching Fresh and Fit, Sneako, Tate or any of those other soulless grifters. They and everyone else in the ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/26 08:15 PM
–

Ok so what if a guy is strictly monogamous and only has sex with women he's already in a relationship with or sees forming a relationship with. Is that guy a beta in your book? Is it solely based on the amount of sex and availability and nothing else whatsoever?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 12:26 AM
2

Genuine question. What is the distinction between alpha and beta. The average amount of sexual partners for heterosexual men is 6.3 (so 7). Is that the cutoff? Is it a simple as have sex=alpha and no have sex=beta? This seems like such an arbitrary and false binary
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/25 06:13 PM
1

Nahhh I just decided to be my normal, dorky, autistic self and am enough of a golden retriever to pull it off. Landed me a few hookups, alot of dates and eventually the best relationship ive been in
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/25 08:39 PM
0

The answer is people are not carbon copies of each other and to put people into arbitrary boxes is to dwell on the surface. You clearly do not take the time to get to know people on a deeper level, because if you did you wouldn't be hurling childish requests out like "list the variations"
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 10:02 PM
2

No, I am insulting them. Because they sound like a terminally online basement dweller.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 09:59 PM
2

Yeah and those men collect in subs like this and turn them into cess pools
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/25 10:47 PM
1

Yeah I don't put people into boxes...... what are you affected by? Your inability not to needlessly pigeonhole people?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/25 10:45 PM
2

Genuine question: do you socialize with other human beings?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/25 10:43 PM
8

You do realize psychopaths tend to be expert manipulators with lots of charisma right? This is not the gotcha you think it is
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/25 02:59 PM
17

Yeah Im tall and outdoorsy and also nerdy and alternative. These are not mutually exclusive. And I met my girlfriend on hinge. Stop being so hung up on putting people into arbitrary boxes. People can pick up on judgy shit like that
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/25 02:50 PM
4

Voting patterns, at least in the US, show a deeply divided and polarized electorate. Sorry, but Trump winning in 2024 is not sufficient enough to claim a cultural mandate. MAGA is only losing steam at this point anyway. Redpill is exhibiting the same
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 08:01 PM
5

It's not. Most people find it spew-inducing (myself included) it's nothing but a misogynistic hate circle jerk
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 07:51 PM
6

A hunter isnt born a good hunter So women are men's prey?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 07:49 PM
0

Given the comments of yours I've seen, nothing anyone says is going to change your mind. This post is yet another way to just bash on women. You chose one comedian and are basing your entire point on her rant. Sure, are there some women who judge men for not having dated? Absolutely. Just like there are men who judge single women. I.e. questions like "how are you still single, what's the catch?" You're just choosing to focus on one over the other
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 05:28 PM
–

No they cannot. This sub is just becoming "how to find new and different ways to convey my hatred of women"
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 03:44 AM
27

You say "benefits women" as though that's a bad thing. How do you expect to date women when you clearly view them as an adversary from the start?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 01:34 AM
3

Your third and fifth points alone sink this horrible idea. It's nobodys business how many other people one is talking to if they're single. This is a privacy issue. The part about ghosting can easily be abused by shitty men who are bitter about rejection even if not ghosted. You also make women pay for a privilege that men just have on the app for free. Again, nobody would buy into this dumpster fire of an idea
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/25 01:07 PM
6

You will get exactly zero dates with this app because no women would ever join it and therefore no incentive exists for men to join it, let alone make it their only dating app. What magic herbs are you smoking?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/25 06:25 AM
7

In other words, if you can't date on a given medium, nobody gets to
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/25 05:26 AM
1

Is it "romanticization" or is is simply destigmatizing divorce and remarriage? There is nothing inherently wrong with a blended family and I don't care what some red pill knob has to say about it either
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 05:03 PM
1

since the loudest voices in “The Manosphere TM 💪🏻” are not perfectly nuanced, that every single thing they say is baseless. Most of what they say is baseless drivel. Therefore people call it out
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 05:34 AM
1

You are conflating sexual objectification in any context with misogyny. Obviously a couple that are together are going to objectify one another in whatever manner they see fit. Because they are CONSENTING to that. This is far different from objectifying some random stranger, cat calling, etc. Those would be misogynistic because they disregard the boundaries of the person being objectified. This to me just reads like you finding another "new angle" to complain about women
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/25 04:19 PM
1

Yeah this isn't hypocrisy. Supporting women being sexually liberated doesn't necessarily mean wanting to date them. Believe it or not some men genuinely care about women beyond just wanting to sleep with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/25 01:51 PM
4

And of course you're going to get nothing but complaints in response 🤣🤣🤣🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 01:50 AM
2

I think your post is bullshit so I'm calling it out. You demonstrate a lack of knowledge of what you're talking about and it shows. I've also read your comments too. Rich people do not get alimony, and people don't generally sue others into debt. You cannot refute what I'm saying so your default is "you're triggered". What exactly am I triggered by? If I agreed with you why would I be triggered?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/25 04:06 PM
1

You picked a bad example, ergo I'm calling it out. His ex took a quarter of his estate, so your example makes your point moot
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/25 04:00 PM
1

You didn't have to. Your post just reeks of bitterness. And you clearly have zero idea what you're talking about when you mention post breakup retribution. You used Bezos as an example and I directly refuted that. You of course had nothing to say to that
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/25 03:47 PM
2

This is Chud logic 101, in that there's no logic. It sounds like you buy into the idea that women ONLY date rich guys or adonises, and that makes you bitter. You simultaneously villainize both the rich guy as well as the woman in the age gap scenario (since we know "age gap relationships" are more often than not older men with younger women) by stating the younger person can manipulate the older one. Also it's very funny that you mention Bezos as being able to significantly ruin the life of an e…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/25 03:35 PM
42

Nobody thinks 25-21 is an age gap. 30 and 18 would be though
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 03:52 AM
–

Yes. If you're bothered by it, don't listen to it. Amazing how this works
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/25 12:14 AM
–

Then don't listen to it
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 05:55 PM
1

Bro we get it. You're a sexually coercive person trying to justify your shitty actions.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 07:54 PM
2

Ah another manosphere kool aid drinking pseudoscientist trying to justify misogyny by deliberately misconstruing a study. At least you linked it for us to pick your post apart more easily. You leave out an entire group (the sex-focused group, the most sexually active group that is not aggressive or violent). That group had the highesr results in regards to amount of sex and sexual partners. I think you know this and are being deliberately bad faith because you yourself are an aggressive misogyni…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 07:51 PM
11

I mean it obviously depends on context. Someone who is a virgin and espouses incel bs doesn't get sympathy. But someone who's just not had good luck or is deliberately staying celibate is obviously different
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/25 02:11 AM
2

Asymmetric courtship? Why even stand for that? I certainly didn't when I was still single. You have to nip that shit in the bud if you're not getting your effort reciprocated
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/25 09:17 PM
6

😭😭😭😭😭😭😭 wahhhhhh wahhhh only fans bad wahhhhh wahhhhhhh
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/25 04:06 PM
8

Nah a rejection is a rejection. I don't chase. Ever. And that worked because I'm in the best relationship I have ever been in and my girlfriend never expected me to chase her or did stupid testing games like this
/r/seduction24/05/25 04:16 PM
8

So by your logic unattractive men do this because they are the opposite of secure. Aka insecure
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/25 08:44 PM
6

90% of girls wear revealing clothes in gen z What the hell do you consider revealing clothes? Because where I live, 90% of women (gen z and others) aren't wearing "revealing" clothes. Is anything other than a potato sack revealing? You seem like you have control issues and that's what this is about. You're choosing women who wear what you consider revealing clothing (and let me be clear you are not a reliable source on that) and trying to change them rather than date someone who you consider to …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/25 08:41 PM
45

You're 100% right. These guys act like they can just change someone once dating. Not how it works
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/25 08:36 PM
1

I mean if my girlfriend asks me for my opinion on her outfit ill give it, but its pretty much a 50/50 shot I actually pick the more revealing outfit, relative to the other choice. Also there are lots of reasons to wear revealing outfits that aren't related to cheating such as it literally being summer. What you describe are not boundaries, they are rules. And trying to impose rules on your partner is a great way to push them away. If you don't like your girlfriends to dress in revealing outfits …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/25 08:31 PM
–

Your first mistake is consuming manosphere content. Men are not "disenfranchised" in the dating world. Because, shocker, we're not entitled to sex. I agree with your point about male suicide but that and sexism from other men is called patriarchy.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 07:09 AM
–

Yeah referring to dating as a "sexual marketplace" and reducing women to a rating and a commodity is a great way to get laid. and it leads to men having to be in the 0.1% to have a chance with a 5/10 or 6/10 Bro most men I know, myself included, have girlfriends. We're not adonises either. Whoever you are getting your information from is lying to you
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 07:07 AM
-1

I think some grass touching is in order
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/25 03:13 PM
-3

This is 100% true. There is not one inaccurate statement in here. Patriarchy is a cancer that needs to be eliminated. It is inherently harmful to women, and as a man it is also not in my best interest either. That being said, I would never associate with someone who is a self-proclaimed misandrist, because that is also against my best interest
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 03:47 AM
33

Simple. Disengage completely. This is a waste of your time. I don't care how hot she is
/r/seduction16/04/25 02:00 AM
2

I hope you know the second you use "Chad" I cease to take you seriously
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 06:24 PM
2

If smoking causes lung cancer then explain how my uncle lived til 90 and he smoked 2 packs a day? Nice cop out. This is shitty analogy and you know it, you also know that you cannot actually debunk what I said. As for the rest of your response, its just petulant whining. Have fun with your tantrum ya cuntstain
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 05:03 PM
9

post wall = Women's desirability drops after 30. I agree the term is used to degrade but it's simply describing a reality. So explain all the women in their thirties who meet their eventual life partner? simply describing a reality. Source? Lemme guess, trust me bro? A woman with a BMI over 27 is “a heifer”. I've seem multiple fat women argue that the term obese is derogatory. The reality is it's just a euphuism treadmill because being fat is always going to be negative. BMI is a bullshit measur…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 03:36 PM
4

I agree with this. In my last round of dating I always had multiple conversations going, multiple dates planned and did not tolerate nonsense (like repeated cancelling, shit tests, etc). I definitely wasn't perfect but this approach got me into a couple flings and then shortly after I met my current girlfriend, and we both knew immediately we wanted to just see each other and deleted our apps on the first date
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/25 04:38 PM
–

Evidence to back this up? Of course not. Because you are posting rage bait
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 12:45 PM
8

This is just how all sexuality is. You're describing "wanting to be desired"
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 01:56 AM
–

100%. Chasing implies she's running away from you. And if it is a "playing hard to get" scenario then don't stand for that either
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 03:15 AM
14

Where did I say be a doormat? I think you're being deliberately obtuse
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 03:47 AM
24

you never punish them You don't punish partners you backwards troglodyte. You talk about issues with them. Because you are both adults
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 03:05 AM
0

They're a troll. Downvote and ignore
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/25 09:07 AM
1

Then get a prenup.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 04:30 PM
8

Oh definitely. He clearly put time into his drivel
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/25 04:58 PM
47

I have lost count on how many times I've heard a variation of this take. You're mad you are not getting any
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/25 01:09 AM
1

Your 1st study showed that women can rely on social support from their male partners after an abortion (aka totally contradicts your point). You didn't read your evidence 🤡
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 08:55 PM
2

No. Your evidence does not back up your point. You're just saying it does when you know otherwise. Ergo you are a weasel
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 08:52 PM
5

12.7% of women who had an abortion we’re married. 87.3% were unmarried. This just means more abortion recipients are single at the time they got the abortion. This says nothing about their relationship prospects later on. Stop being a weasel
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 07:13 AM
7

Lemme guess, your source on that is "trust me brooooooo"
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 07:10 AM
3

Why would it be?
/r/seduction17/01/25 11:40 PM
1

When dating, focus on how YOU feel on the dates. Obviously be a considerate date but if you feel you're not having effort reciprocated, thats probably not a person to continue with. One date is one date. Nothing more, nothing less. And there's nothing wrong with playing the field to a degree when you're single, so long as you're not manipulating anyone
/r/seduction17/01/25 08:54 PM
1

I mean who can blame you? Society conks us men over the head with all these expectations so its hard to ignore that. Even now I have to wrestle with it. But the way I see it, if you're a man, you're a man. There's not some arbitrary checklist as to what makes you a man. (Aside from biology/identity) Anyone who will tell you otherwise is trying to take advantage of you and benefit at your expense.
/r/seduction17/01/25 08:50 PM
1

It definitely is. That desperation is how I ended up being lovebombed in a toxic relationship. Trust me it's much better to feel lonely and single than to feel dead inside because of a horrible relationship. Are there things you like to do that are completely separate from dating?
/r/seduction17/01/25 08:40 PM
1

By viewing dating as simply one facet of my life. It helps that I am quite obsessive over my hobbies I will say that. But yes taking the magnitude of dating as a need away will help you feel better in general. It will also give you WAY less patience for those who do play games (shit tests, rosters, etc). This approach helped me find my now partner because I was less concerned with getting dates and more concerned with the quality of them
/r/seduction17/01/25 08:27 PM
5

Bro I was a virgin at 22. It's really not that big of a deal.
/r/seduction17/01/25 08:17 PM
3

What helped me was dating NATO (Not Attached To Outcome) when I would go on dates, and it sounds cliche but finding hobbies and things outside of dating to bring you fulfillment helps alot. That also will help you feel like finding a partner is a want and not a need, then you look for people who add to your life instead of feeling desperate, because that obviously sucks and is not fun. That's what I'd say
/r/seduction17/01/25 07:03 PM
49

Barring the many assumptions made in this post that may or may not hold any water, this is why you don't put your eggs in one basket until you have the exclusivity conversation. If its obvious you're on a roster, your date is not very tactful and you should probably keep your options open as well
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 04:35 PM
1

Ohhh yes without a doubt
/r/seduction17/01/25 05:26 AM
35

I do not act or talk like I'm envious and bitter Your whole post is talking about how "ugly guys" end up with beautiful women and why that's unfair to you. Yes, you're envious and bitter. what do you think is the reason I have no success huh? Because you're entitled as well, you think that since you have this laundry list of apparently good qualities you should be getting dates. This is an attitude that people can pick up on. It's also the attitude that a certain very angry and violent online co…
/r/seduction17/01/25 02:09 AM
25

No kidding. This idea of being "entitled" to dates is concerning and literally leads to violence
/r/seduction17/01/25 01:51 AM
280

The reason you have no luck is because you REEK of envy and bitterness. That is palpable. You wrote a whole diatribe of drivel mocking and putting down these guys that are, in the metric of dating, better than you
/r/seduction17/01/25 01:27 AM
1

I mean I'll direct infantilizing insults at someone if they're acting childish. But yeah I agree its a weird double standard
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/25 09:27 PM
13

aren’t dumb enough to marry a poor person. Ok yeah you're a troll. Nothing you say should be taken seriously in any way
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 08:50 PM
2

Do you have this outlook with men too or are women just inherently dishonest in your book? Your answer to this determines how seriously anyone should take you
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 02:54 AM
-8

First of all, I guess we are just ignoring the fact of rape and abuse to all women in general. This is statistically quite common, so much so that part of that "normal adult life experience" you talk about is, for women, finding ways to mitigate and defend against that. Are you being deliberately obtuse or are you actually this dense? more sexual with their female friends than any man in their life They might be more physically affectionate with one another than men are, but the fact that you se…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 01:56 AM
1

Casual sex has always been a thing. Sure there are select periods where it is less stigmatized but a world without casual sex is a pipe dream
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 06:08 PM
–

Are you trolling? Because this is some of the most incoherent drivel I have ever read
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/24 01:44 PM
1

Yeah and this is why you do cheap things like coffee for the first date and move on if a woman scoffs at that. Or just ask to go dutch and reject the women who scoff at that
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 05:39 PM
1

No. Testing your partner is a stupid, manipulative ridiculous and immature move and those who do it are all of those things
/r/seduction27/12/24 05:29 AM
–

I agree with you about abortion. The only question I have is what about a situation where a woman baby traps a man. Because in the reverse, where a man baby traps a woman, we all would probably agree (those of us who believe in bodily autonomy anyway) that abortion is the right answer for such an abusive act.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/24 07:18 PM
–

You can literally boil all of this down to one simple truth: parenting is a two-yes situation
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/24 07:15 PM
9

even saying you are on the side of a specific killer to put an example. Bro most people are on Luigi Mangione's side, feminists or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/24 08:24 PM
2

No, they're all bullshit. I've definitely had toxic relationships but now being a healthy one, my answer is these things are not fact. Sure there are some people that check off some of them. But some of these, like the 100+ body count by age 16, are so laughably ridiculous and stupid that I'd majorly question the intelligence of someone gullible enough to believe that.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/24 02:58 PM
–

Because Feminist/progressive women care far more about emotional stability than material provision.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 04:11 AM
1

Can you cite said statistics along with relevant context or are you just going to say "statistically" and expect me to blindly trust you
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/24 09:29 PM
2

Per the OP, its abs. Dick size is not mentioned in their example so I don't mention it in my response
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/24 08:51 PM
3

And 6'2 is definitely not the average
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/24 01:33 AM
2

Yes because OPs example does as well
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/24 12:01 AM
9

So yeah, basically the 666 rule excludes 99% of the male population
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/24 08:49 PM
6

I agree. People treat that as objective fact and fail to realize it does not jive with reality. That's very dangerous
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/24 08:49 PM
8

No. I have one of the 6's (height) but definitely not the other two and I'm in a happy relationship. Alot of men I know also don't have all the 6s and some don't have any, and yet still, relationships. Or dates with little issues. 666 is bullshit, peddled by grifters like Tate. It is not congruent with reality. You should not pay any credence to it For reference, if you're a man whos 6'0, you're already taller than 86% of the male population. If you make six figures, you're richer than 84% of th…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/24 07:11 PM
4

Theyll do that and then just make a bunch of assertions and basically say "trust me bro"
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/24 05:46 PM
3

We're not "in denial" what you're saying is true is not jiving with our own anecdotal observation. Most people I know, myself included, are in relationships, those that are not are either choosing not to date or their dating lives are decent. It's hard to give any credence to your viewpoint when it directly contradicts peoples own observations/anecdotes. Especially since you just make a whole bunch of assertions with zero evidence to back them up.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/24 05:44 PM
0

Why is it ridiculous to shame a man for dating women half his age? male promiscuity is absurdly starting to get shamed, Female promiscuity is always shamed. But that's perfectly fine right? Your whole post is just rambling drivel about how men are better than women
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/24 03:48 PM
0

So men don't need relationships but women hold all the cards in relationships? How are both of these things true. If men don't need relationships to love and feel love and women supposedly do, then wouldn't the reverse be true? The man would hold the cards per your logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/24 03:26 AM
3

I'm sure those "landwhales" get more action than you
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 05:57 AM
3

can tell you that it certainly makes average guys harder to tolerate since we haven’t had nearly as much playing time as Chad. In other words you're not making a sound moral argument. You're just mad that "Chad" gets laid more often. I bet you would gladly play the field if you could get away with it, but it's not ok for women to do that right?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 05:43 AM
19

So you're jealous? You're not actually making a sound moral argument, you're just mad you're not getting laid
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 05:39 AM
2

Wow, a very original idea that has not been restated a million times before......
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/24 05:28 PM
1

Probably not unless they desire to "convert" her which is gross. Just like I as a liberal man wouldn't date a conservative woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 08:24 PM
2

Racism and fascism
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 08:23 PM
2

And yet redpill chuds are finding it harder and harder to date
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 07:17 PM
0

Of course. Because these redpill chuds are just the same as influencers on tiktok
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 07:17 PM
0

Yeah but it's not. Don't get me wrong, doing things like working out are good, because they are conducive to better physical and mental health. But this idea that you need to be some ripped bro making six figures to date any woman is ridiculous. If you're constantly running into women with such ludicrous standards you need to change something up.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 07:11 PM
-1

Dating doesn't have a formula. And women (like men) are not a monolith. This is the issue with RP bullshit, it seeks to commodify and mathematize dating. Do you seriously believe that you need to be ripped and have "an online persona" to date? I'll tell you a great way to up your chances. Stop listening to redpill chucklefucks and Tatebros. They're ALL grifters. All of them. They want you lonely and miserable so they can continue their grift.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 07:06 PM
2

People are not commodities. They are free to date or not date whoever they please. Your post is nothing but cope
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/24 03:51 PM
5

I'm glad to hear you are consistent
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/24 10:11 PM
21

So yes coercion is always bad. So then I assume men prohibiting their wives/girlfriends etc from getting abortions is also bad? Or are you going to pull some double standard bs.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/24 05:42 PM
9

Man even when Trump wins, the Trumpies are still whining
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/24 05:40 PM
33

No he's not because he is whining about a fake issue
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/24 05:38 PM
16

That's exactly what would happen. If I had a dollar for every time I saw "she's for the streets" on reddit I'd have a years rent (so $15000)
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/24 05:38 PM
–

And you're a selfish chucklefuck who cannot get women to date you because you reek of bitterness and resentment. This post is your way of coping with that
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/24 08:47 PM
–

You say TRP is proven to be supported by social psychology and statistics and then offer no evidence to back it, no studies, no figures, nothing. The rest of this post is nothing more than angry drivel. While I agree with you that online dating has issues, you offer zero solutions and just blame women. It is also interesting that you complain about feminists engaging in ad-hominem, but then do the same thing Anyone who denies this at this point cannot be trusted. You're attacking the character o…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/24 04:32 PM
3

I'm sure he doesn't
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/24 05:51 PM
6

Redpillers generally want EVERYONE to adhere to traditional gender roles. They want that to be the expectation, again for everyone. You see the issue with that right?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/24 03:51 AM
–

Of course looks are important. But you're talking in extremes. You don't need "supermodel looks" to be considered attractive. There are plenty of people who are not conventionally attractive that are in relationships or that confidence, charm, and excitement aren’t heavily correlated with NPD, I’m happy to debate that. Correlation doesn't equal causation. What point are you even trying to make? Of course women don't select for narcissism. No one does. And not every run of the mill asshole guy is…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/24 11:32 PM
–

(outside of supermodel looks, of course) This right here shows how out of touch you are. Do you how many men (myself included) are in happy relationships and don't have "supermodel looks"? You have basically said a bunch of pseudointellectual drivel that seeks to give the appearance of disagreement with the "nice guy" sentiment while propping it up. Literally go outside and you'll find all of your views in this post disproven
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/24 11:12 PM
1

Aka you're a 5'2 neckbeard troglodyte
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/24 04:09 PM
2

Oh my god dude. You are essentially saying that us as men are such whiny little bitch boys that we throw a massive temper tantrum because "those mean women hurt our pwecious male feefees" and say that that is why reproductive freedom is at risk. Which by the way, is in NOBODYS best interest. Bro, go outside and touch grass, and take a fucking shower
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/24 04:37 PM
6

Define help or physically protect. Am I as a man going to potentially sacrifice my life for a stranger? Absolutely not. Because then the people in my life who love/care about/need me don't have me anymore. It's so bizarre seeing all these men on here creating anti-hero revenge fantasies against women. Please, please go outside. For fucks sake
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/24 10:33 PM
12

These are both so oddly specific........
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/24 11:38 PM
5

I call bullshit on all of this. You're actually in your room jacking off into a sock and mad that you don't have an anime waifu.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/24 03:51 AM
2

Women don’t report casual sex, don’t call it casual sex and refer it as a temporary relationship, and maybe only to tell their bff. So which is it? Are women shown to have more casual sex or are they not? Because if they are not reporting having more casual sex, then the evidence necessary to make your assertion true is not there. And absence of evidence is evidence of absence. How about I dumb it down for your roid-rage riddled brooooooo brain. You are full of shit
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/24 03:38 AM
14

Your article does not support your point, you make multiple contradictory statements or oxymorons (such as in average.....but that's not normal. An average is literally the definition of normal), and you throw out baseless percentages and make baseless claims and expect us to just trust and believe you. Get out of your chair that likely reeks of BO and man ass, go outside, touch grass, and stop being such a bitter, jaded, misogynistic chucklefuck. Have a good day, and maybe try a vibrating butt …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/24 03:35 AM
2

Sounds like this is your standard and you're butthurt about dragged for it. If you're setting moral standards (and body count is a moral standard, otherwise why would it matter at all?) that you yourself do not live up to, then yes you're a hypocrite. That's a double standard. promiscuity doesn't work the same way for men and women anyway, that's just a deluded modern take on equality and not rooted in reality. and i'm not talking about specifically looking for virgins either. This is a cope wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 06:26 PM
1

It depends on the standard. People are supposed to compliment one another, not be carbon copies of each other. Alot of things can't be applied evenly across genders. However, you mention the virgin thing. I do believe that's hypocritical (double standard) because the men that hold this standard balk at a woman for having a sexual past while they themselves have one. It's a morality judgment. And I do believe if you're imposing a moral standard you yourself do not live up to, that is 100% hypocri…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 04:57 PM
5

Because the men that do this are judging those women for their past while giving themselves a free pass for their own past. That's not a case of complimenting one anothers shortcomings. You can't judge someone for a sexual past if you also have one. So yes, I think a man who wants a virgin with no sexual past when he has one is both a hypocrite and a creep
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 04:52 PM
1

Because there are alot of horny men. And alot of horny women, and commitment is scary if you're not ready for it. Also keep in mind there are lots of people for whom physical connection (not just referring to sex but that too) is an essential component in building the emotional safety required for a long term relationship. My girlfriend and I are both like this. We personally did not and could not wait to define us as boyfriend and girlfriend to get physical. If you're not the same way, you're e…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 12:05 AM
6

This is called.... dating.
/r/seduction20/10/24 01:43 AM
6

Thank you, happy to spread the use of chucklefuck. It is a very good word 🤣🤣🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/24 06:06 PM
3

Do you go outside? Who, in your day to day life has ever referred to themselves as a size queen? 🤣🤣🤣🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/24 06:05 PM
5

Thank you, I decided to edit that out because I felt like being less humble 🤣🤣🤣🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/24 06:01 PM
26

Do you actually talk to women? Like in real life? Most of the women I know are not dating adonises. My girlfriend certainly doesn't have delusional standards either. It's almost like women, like men, are not a monolith and each individual person has their own needs, wants, etc. I don't see with my own eye any of the trends described by redpill chucklefucks. I don't see them in my life, in the lives of the people in my life, etc. The most egregious thing I have ever personally come across in my d…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/24 05:39 PM
1

I try harder when I think the reward is worth it. As my girlfriend would say, fun facts
/r/seduction15/10/24 12:16 AM
0

White knight spotted. Women can weed out shitty partners and attract good ones without engaging in stupid shit tests. Also it's "weed them out"
/r/seduction15/10/24 12:09 AM
2

You fail a shit test by acknowledging it as a shit test or actually complying. I disengage upon being shit tested. I have absolutely zero patience for childish drivel like that
/r/seduction15/10/24 12:07 AM
3

I don't waste my time on tests. Tests are for immature adult babies who cannot communicate. I'm happy I have a partner who communicates like an adult
/r/seduction15/10/24 12:04 AM
2

So you're a single dad and won't date single moms, and you're complaining? A bit hypocritical don't you think?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/24 06:01 PM
1

I don't think trying to be friends first is good advice at all. Friendship should be genuine not a means to an end. Treating women like human beings means also not putting them on a pedestal
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 08:05 PM
2

"What sort of toxic purity culture bullshit is this?"-my girlfriend
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/24 03:22 AM
1

Literally. And these people wonder why they struggle with dating. Having this outlook doesn't help anyone
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/24 07:38 PM
5

In the future there will be sex robots and imo women will start regressing value wise but for now it's at its peak It's giving "my crush rejected me so actually all women suck and sex robots will make them obsolete anyway." You REEK of resentment, probably why you can't get a date
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/24 03:36 PM
7

<image>
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/24 03:51 AM
8

<image>
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/24 03:45 AM
12

Find the limit for this formula as x approaches bullshit. Because thats all you're spewing
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/24 03:27 AM
0

Ok Arthur Fleck
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/24 03:02 PM
37

I feel bad that it is normal for women to just be constantly sexualized, many times starting when they are underage. That must be exhausting and it shouldn't be "just a part of life"
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/24 06:50 PM
9

This is 100% a sack of shit. And since the only way you back this up is essentially "trust me bro" I can use my own anecdotal experience and say you're full of shit
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/24 12:40 PM
8

You do realize that even today, most women have only had 5 partners on average Aka a statistic that is well known and substantiated unlike that 82% drivel
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/24 04:10 AM
7

82% of women partake in casual sex and the majority do it it again. Do you care to actually substantiate this or are you just gonna be like "trust me broooooo"
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/24 04:07 AM
–

<image>
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/24 04:01 PM
1

Hold on, lemme take another sip of my yerba. Ok.... What the actual fuck is this drivel you're spewing? You do realize men and women can be friends and that flirty banter can coexist with deep conversation in romantic connections?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/24 03:42 PM
–

All of your examples are psychopaths, and psychopaths are often extremely charming, and charismatic. They mask their true personalities. If you're going to make the point that women citing personality as a shortcoming is bullshit, using psychopaths as an example is picking low hanging fruit
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/24 03:25 PM
–

"Wokeness the dominant religion" do you wonder why nobody takes your whining seriously?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/24 03:01 PM
1

I literally cannot develop interest in a woman if I am chasing. Its actually a turn off if its not reciprocal right off the bat
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/24 08:55 PM
0

What else would you call a Christian who behaves like a fascist?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 08:11 PM
6

Scientists are not supposed to filter out data that doesn't support a prescribed conclusion. If these men were like scientists they wouldn't be peddling all the bullshit they peddle
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 05:25 PM
2

Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens are grifters. Matt Walsh is just a christofascist nutbag but he is definitely sincere in his beliefs
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 01:06 AM
2

Relationships are conditional love. Should someone jsut stay with their partner out of "love" if the relationship is nothing but pain and heartache and their needs aren't met? Because Ive certainly made that mistake with previous girlfriends and that sucks. And I shouldn't have.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 11:32 PM
3

It seems as though these days you have to be at least 6 feet, chiseled jawline, lots of money and status, and more. This is just not true. If this were the case the vast majority of women would be single since "at least 6 feet" excludes 86% of the male population. And if you just, you know, go outside into the real world you'll see way more than 14% of women in relationships. This mentality does not serve any purpose beyond keeping you stuck
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 11:25 PM
1

though I'd say I'm comparatively a bit better looking and definitely wittier and more charismatic. Starting out with this is not a good look. It reeks of insecurity and overcompensation
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/24 03:54 PM
0

Go outside and touch some grass
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 08:36 PM
–

Nice job cherry picking extreme examples as though they're the norm. I'm gonna guess you have one of these scenarios in your life and are projecting
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 03:32 PM
12

More very short and hollow relationships
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 08:41 PM
1

Therapy works to unpack issues. You should definitely not do it in the hopes of attracting women. You should do it if you think it is a positive addition to your life
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 05:28 AM
1

(for example spousal rape) Rage bait
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 05:18 AM
1

Took me a few minutes to realize LJBF is "let's just be friends"
/r/seduction13/06/24 04:19 PM
0

🤣🤣🤣🤣
/r/seduction13/06/24 05:57 AM
9

I can tell 🤣 you got a laugh outta me with that one. I do love a good quip
/r/seduction13/06/24 05:48 AM
15

No it is disrespect. And it's immature. I'd leave someone for shit testing
/r/seduction13/06/24 05:35 AM
–

Statistically, no. they aren't lol. You say statistically and then offer no statistic
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 07:45 PM
2

Facts. The only red pill I need in my life is the ibuprofen I have to take to remedy the headache I get from listening to manosphere troglodytes whine and complain about women
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 04:47 PM
3

The only thing TRP has been able to do is to get perpetually online dudes to spend all day talking about the RP. Online. I have never seen a more concise and well thought out summary of the red pill movement
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 04:46 PM
0

how to deal with shit tests (agree & amplify), to watch how women act and not what they say, etc Here's how you deal with shit tests. You don't. You don't tolerate stupid bullshit like that Things like dual mating strategy, alpha fucks/beta bucks, importance of looks, height, money, status, dominance, etc. Alpha fucks beta bucks is definitely not rooted in science and biology. And we're humans, we have more than just our biology. I think you'd do alot better with women if you didn't treat them a…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 04:34 PM
1

Well yeah if he's being a creep about it of course. But if the horny partner just nonchalantly takes care of it themselves that's not a problem
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/24 01:25 AM
3

Nahhh Tism rizz is a thing. Signed another autistic person
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/24 11:13 PM
1

Would you say that man is a reasonable person?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/24 11:09 PM
2

choose 1-player mode Nice expression
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/24 08:23 PM
1

I think you're trying to bait people into taking issue with the horny partner, which will inevitably draw pushback since that would be out of line. Your repeated questions about browser history curiosity back up what I'm saying
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/24 08:23 PM
4

OP, I'm not sure what you're going for with this. No reasonable person would find fault with either party in your hypothetical scenario. The not in the mood partner can refuse and the horny partner can take care of their urges so they're not just horny stewing all night. This seems like an attempt at rage bait
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/24 08:04 PM
1

OP, I'm not sure what you're going for with this. No reasonable person would find fault with either party in your hypothetical scenario. The not in the mood partner can refuse and the horny partner can take care of their urges so they're not just horny stewing all night. This seems like an attempt at rage bait
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/24 08:03 PM
2

All I'm saying is that the refuser getting their own feelings hurt in this example isn't some great mystery. I It's not but that's on the refuser. And I agree with your post I think OP is baiting. Because no reasonable person would consider either partner wrong in this scenario if that's actually how it played out
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/24 07:57 PM
2

But It's also not rapey to seduce your partner more than a 'hey wanna bang?' I think that depends on the situation. I would take "I'm not in the mood" at face value and just take care of the urges myself. If that creates an issue then that's kind of a no win situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/24 07:50 PM
0

Can you imagine feeling a little insecure because your partner was horny enough to masturbate right now but was uninterested in tempting you to be a part of it? Aka not taking no for an answer? Yeah if one partner is horny and the other is not in the mood, the not in the mood partner cannot be offended if the horny partner chooses to just take care of it themselves. Sure they may feel a certain way but they have zero right to act on that without being abusive
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/24 07:41 PM
2

Yes. So saying 30 is old mathematically makes no sense
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/24 07:37 PM
–

What are you smoking?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/24 06:14 AM
20

The average human lifespan is nearly 80. No 30 is not old, or "somewhat old". That's ridiculous 🤣 sure maybe a 30 year old is less youthful than a 20 year old but I think you're taking a bit of dramatic license with this
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 11:30 PM
1

It used to be much less conditional, but I'm done being hurt in relationships. So if my needs (physical, emotional, otherwise) go unmet for a sustained period the relationship is done. If I'm being treated like a burden/inconvenience or like I'm beneath them, the relationship is done. I will always put my best foot forward to meet my partners needs so I expect the same
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 05:21 AM
1

Yeah they're both full of rabid sexist termites
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 05:51 PM
7

I think this is your fetish and you're acting it out here. This system would never work. Not that patriarchy is good either it's not and it's good we're working to do away with it. But this is not any better or more noble
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 05:50 PM
1

Exclusivity comes with the agreement of taking care of eachother's needs. This is something that people love to gloss over or take issue with but it's 100% true
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/24 01:08 AM
1

Yes. No one is owed sex, nor is anyone owed a relationship
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/24 01:02 AM
–

She does realize the other side of this coin right? That if all women need to do is look pretty and put out then as soon as they stop either the man has no reason to stay. Now I definitely do not subscribe to this Neanderthal way of thinking I'm just pointing out the logical conclusion
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/24 02:27 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter