TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Sebatron2 Archive

View 12 posts and 120 comments by Sebatron2 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

At rates that wouldn't exist if bias in favour of the wealthy wasn't happening.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/24 06:03 PM
5

Say what you will about theorists who (rightly or wrongly) apply his ideas to other aspects of society, Marx's point of a class system being inherent to capitalism and those at the top using their position to keep the rest down is solid.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/24 05:46 PM
5

I can only hold my nose so tightly and I'm already strategically voting for the NDP.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/10/24 03:31 AM
5

I'd sympathize, if the Liberal Party wasn't a bunch of corpo-centrists.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/10/24 11:01 PM
5

As a Canadian, I'm parking my vote with the NDP. Because the LPC and CPC are worse, especially the CPC.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/10/24 05:09 PM
6

Are you also going to give us the price of herring in Stockholm?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/01/24 06:22 PM
1

I'm a socialist, specifically market socialist. But on the question of the state, I'm sympathetic enough to anarchism that I wouldn't lift a finger to defend the state. Though not enough to label myself an anarchist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/12/21 05:43 AM
3

Out of the major parties of the US, neither. Unless, for some strange reason, you're counting "talking a big game and then forgetting about said game whenever it's politically convenient" as championing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/21 11:22 PM
2

Prioritising the group is left wing politics, prioritising the individual is right wing politics. Right wing politics effectively wants the government to have little control over your life and left wing is about regulation. Tell that to individualist anti-capitalist anarchists.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/21 05:55 PM
2

In conjunction with what /u/TheSourGrapes said, 1) no system is perfect, so there'll always be cracks for people to slip through, and 2) just because a minimum is provided for doesn't mean that the particular minimum is actually decent (or immune from being lowered).
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/07/21 01:29 PM
2

Then you're a bit naive. Even social democracy relies on the stick of poverty, it's simply smaller than other capitalist models.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/07/21 04:19 AM
3

Can capitalism reduce poverty? Yes. But it can't completely eliminate it due capitalism relying on poverty to keep workers willing to toe the line.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/07/21 01:51 AM
7

[yang] is all for ending poverty, fixing capitalism Pick one. You can't end poverty simply by fixing capitalism. Completely ending it would be a necessary step.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/21 11:32 PM
7

Just because the right is "better" (is simply being more willing to use your rhetoric really substantially better?) in one regard, doesn't mean that I'm going to abandon my economic views nor the rest of my social views.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/06/21 02:19 PM
13

More open simply for the purpose of using the rhetoric to attack the left, rather than actually implementing its actual policies. So not really pro-male (unless you count social conservatives as pro-male).
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/06/21 02:13 AM
0

While it certainly would make her a bad journalist, I'm not sure it would make her a disgusting human being.
/r/MensRights02/06/21 04:22 PM
2

Not OP, and I can't find the specific statutes, but this FAQ from the Department of Justice does support the info provided.
/r/MensRights08/05/21 03:54 PM
12

Just because a certain demographic forms a majority of voters doesn't mean that the needs/views of that demographic are adequately represented. Just as an example, workers form a supermajority of voters in the US, yet the leadership of both political parties are focused on the economic needs/views of the wealthy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/11/20 04:20 AM
2

I'm a market socialist that's leaning towards anarchism, particularly of the individualist and/or mutualist variety.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/08/19 12:41 AM
2

It is a given, on the same level as "water is wet and sky is blue" that sexual promiscuity is societal detriment. I could list all the reasons for that here of course, but then again, my name isn't Google, so I won't. A given amongst who? Social conservatives? What we have then is you defending it, for reasons only known to you, for certain, but I'm going to make a couple wild-ass guesses here. ...[Wildly inaccurate guesses]... I don't know which of these guesses is on point, but I'm willing to …
/r/MensRights24/12/18 01:55 PM
2

Promiscuity is immoral. And the reason for that is...? Traditional morality is the foundation of a functioning society. As promiscuity is accepted, morality unravels, and so does society in turn. I'm highly skeptical that traditional morality would be the one and only thing capable of serving as the foundation of a functioning society, especially considering the large variance in what is considered "traditional morality" not only across societies, but across time periods within societies as well…
/r/MensRights24/12/18 02:31 AM
1

The arrangement ends the moment the man is getting more outside action. [Citation needed.]
/r/MensRights24/12/18 12:09 AM
2

I would agree with you about the strangeness of the question if it was about the rightness or wrongness of cheating (or otherwise breaking the established boundaries of the relationship) rather than the rightness or wrongness of sexual promiscuity by itself. And yes, I'm sure I'm in the right sub, because I'm supportive of men's rights.
/r/MensRights24/12/18 12:04 AM
1

What exactly is wrong with sexual promiscuity? And why wouldn't restricting people's choices be worse?
/r/MensRights23/12/18 11:02 PM
8

If all the involved people know and support the arrangement, what exactly is the problem?
/r/MensRights23/12/18 03:07 PM
1

But they're not really "for progress" either, so I think that "regressive left" would be a much better term for them.
/r/MensRights18/10/18 01:45 AM
1

This is why I think that English needs a gender-neutral pronoun that is a seperate pronounciation/spelling/whatever from all other pronouns.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 05:09 PM
1

I think y'all is more is a southern dialect, That's why I didn't include it within mainstream English (ie common to most (if not all) of the English speaking world).
/r/MensRights31/05/18 08:27 PM
2

I think that there is also y'all, but either one hasn't replaced "you" as plural within mainstream/default English.
/r/MensRights31/05/18 08:16 PM
2

The pro capitalism (read: pro-competition, pro-small business, not Monopolizing/Cartel corporatism) right. There are some leftists who'd disagree that the first two are exclusive to capitalism and that capitalism isn't based on the last one.
/r/MensRights31/05/18 07:22 PM
4

I clarified that I'd said "it," and was informed that I was creepy for doing so. I got a full lecture on the singular "they," Either way, English definitely needs a singular third-person pronoun that is separate from the plural. Plus separate plural and singular "you".
/r/MensRights31/05/18 06:28 PM
2

I would like to hear from leftist MRAs on why they still adhere to the left. I'm still a leftist because I find that some leftist philosophers' critiques of modern society, especially of the economic setup, and their solutions to be better than that of "the right". I am at a loss to understand how MRAs can side with the left, especially considering the left is responsible for most of the persecution we face: Bradley Amendment, College kangaroo courts, VAWA, etc. I've acknowledged that politics h…
/r/MensRights05/05/18 08:19 PM
4

That's really an unworkable solution. The risk grows exponentially the more hands are in control of some prospect. Consider mining operations. Who's going to buy the heavy machinery? Is every worker going to chip in? Then who is going to pay for repairs? How will you ensure every person pays their dues? Ever hear of worker cooperatives? And they're (on average) as good as, if not better than, more conventional firms.
/r/MensRights11/04/18 01:56 AM
2

I think that the means of production should be owned by the workers.
/r/MensRights10/04/18 11:59 PM
12

Being left-wing or progressive doesn't mean you're a misandrist anymore than being right-wing means you're a corporate shill or a religious nut.
/r/MensRights10/04/18 10:56 PM
1

It did happen.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 04:00 PM
2

The particular feminists he was mocking were the "God is female and maternal love will save humanity" variety, which is nutty even for feminists.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 03:59 PM
1

Essentially, the case for closing women’s prisons is the same as the case for imprisoning fewer men. It is the case against the prison industrial complex and for community-based treatment where it works better than incarceration. But there is evidence that prison harms women more than men, so why not start there? Why close women's prisons when ending the War on Drugs and the criminalization of prostitution would be far more effective (for both men or women prisons)?
/r/MensRights24/12/17 06:33 PM
3

And that's why I think that it would be a good idea to replace the position of President with something like the Swiss Federal Council and introduce some electoral reform (particularly STV) for Congress. It (probably) won't stop all of them from getting into office, but at least enough competition (and other people getting into office) to get them to chill the fuck out.
/r/MensRights28/11/17 10:53 PM
1

Also, feudalism still existed into the early 20th century, or did you forget about Russia? And secondly, how does the final transfer date between feudalism and capitalism contradict the any statements that capitalism is based on big business and government being in bed together?
/r/MensRights12/10/17 04:33 PM
3

While capitalism is freer than feudalism, capitalism's history has shown that it is far from the epitome of either economic freedom or equal availability of entrepreneurship.
/r/MensRights12/10/17 04:04 PM
1

Only capitalism has lifted people out of poverty. Over the last 150 or so years, when capitalism has spread throughout the world, average incomes have soared and the percentage of people living in poverty has fallen from over 80% to around 10% today and still falling. That is contradicted by your statement that: "Capitalism" is just a word that means "economic freedom". since for far longer than 150 years, government and big business have been teaming up at the expense of everybody else. [Edit: …
/r/MensRights12/10/17 02:28 PM
1

Well, A) she made the original accusations in 2013 and the pictures of her in the article seem to be current, so for all we know, she could've gained most of the weight in the 4 years. And B) there might be some very desperate chubby-chasers out there.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 03:20 PM
1

I seriously didn't know it was based on a comic. I wasn't ever interested in Annie enough to actually research its background and my interest in comics either of the childhood comedic vain (i.e. Calvin and Hobbes) or of the sci-fi vain (i.e. superheroes and FBP: Federal Bureau of Physics), like the rest of my literary tastes.
/r/MensRights12/06/17 11:13 AM
0

Are the three movies you listed based off of comic books? Since if they don't, they don't contradict what the quote says.
/r/MensRights06/06/17 03:48 PM
3

How so?
/r/MensRights13/04/17 06:59 PM
1

Except feminism is literally built on a marxist framework. And the framework for pickup trucks were designed off of the framework for cars, but that doesn't make the two synonyms.
/r/MensRights13/04/17 06:57 PM
4

"Feminist" and "Marxist" are synonyms. That'll be like saying that "MRA" and "misogynist" are synonyms. Socialism is a much more watered down version of feminism. As a non-feminist socialist, my reaction to this is a mix of this and this.
/r/MensRights13/04/17 06:51 PM
3

there is considerable overlap between socialism and feminism. I agree, in the sense that the majority of socialist groups/parties are also feminist. But not in the sense that the majority of feminist groups are also socialist. Feminism has significant political influence, ergo socialism is a heavily influential ideology in politics. It is, after all, a major contributor to the rise of socialized services from our governments. I admit that socialists contributed to the current welfare programs (d…
/r/MensRights13/04/17 06:20 PM
5

A) "Feminist" and "socialist" aren't synonyms. B) The mainstream media are mainly corporate puppets and (actual) socialists are anti-capitalist, which would be a bit contradictory if it was socialist.
/r/MensRights13/04/17 06:00 PM
3

Our children are being harassed by gullible teachers who have been programmed by weirdo academics, aided and abetted by socialist politicians [Emphasis mine] Last time I checked, there wasn't enough politicians who were socialists for them to have significant influence of policy. Unless the author is defining "socialist" as "people whose ideology I don't like", which probably means so many people that the word wouldn't have much meaning.
/r/MensRights13/04/17 04:31 PM
4

You ask anyone on the Left what they think of MRA and they will immediately describe it as Right wing extremism. But I'm on the Left and I wouldn't describe it in that way. Don't blame the person who posted that. And where did I blame OP?
/r/MensRights19/03/17 09:04 PM
2

Remembrance Day (Veteran's Day for Americans). I would say more like if Veteran's Day and Memorial Day had a baby.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 02:31 PM
25

the Left has largely won the culture war on campuses, now it's just a question of whether the Right can have some sort of dignified fighting retreat and I think that the Men's Rights Movement is part of that The MRM is part of the Right because?
/r/MensRights19/03/17 01:43 PM
26

But why?
/r/MensRights22/02/17 09:15 PM
3

Thanks.
/r/MensRights19/02/17 01:41 PM
4

Do you have a version that is available in Canada?
/r/MensRights19/02/17 01:26 PM
2

Damn it. It ends at 10pm and I have an early morning shift the next day.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 03:25 AM
1

I meant more detailed info. Still doesn't tell me time, which room, nor where to get tickets.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 03:13 AM
2

Do you have info on that? I would like to see it.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 01:22 AM
2

What is the central belief that drives actions like quotas, affirmative action, etc. that we're seeing so often today? There's a set OUTCOME that's deemed to be desired, and so the system is forced by legislative mandate into producing that outcome. Why does not liking capitalism mean liking the kind of outcome based thinking that you mentioned? I'm anti-capitalist and I care way more about processes and opportunities than outcomes. And why does not liking aforementioned kind of thinking means l…
/r/MensRights01/12/16 10:26 PM
3

Jennifer Pozner of Women in Media & News noted that women have built power online via the feminist blogosphere and social media for about a decade. This has allowed feminists to influence the dominant narrative Are they unaware that feminism is the dominant narrative in regards to gender issues?
/r/MensRights23/11/16 10:43 PM
3

In his sentencing, the judge said Turner had “less moral culpability” because he was drunk. It’s almost too easy to see this as one member of an elite social stratum protecting another. In all probability, the judge wasn't protecting the guy, but just applying the same principle that allows drunk drivers who've killed someone to be charged/convicted of negligent homicide and/or involuntary manslaughter rather than voluntary manslaughter or second degree murder. If the defendant had been poor and…
/r/MensRights10/06/16 09:41 AM
-15

To be fair, whatever mental ailment that is putting her in the category of unfit could've expressed itself only after she stopped being principal.
/r/MensRights03/06/16 09:27 AM
4

People get a label when they're bad." So anybody who has a political label (ex. conservative, liberal, etc.) is bad?
/r/MensRights09/04/16 04:13 PM
2

I know. I'm Canadian myself. And I would be pretty left even by Canadian standards since, economically speaking, I lean heavily towards (if not fall under the label) market socialism.
/r/MensRights13/11/15 08:05 PM
8

the despotism of the left exercising its tyranny over straight white males Please don't put the whole left in with these kind of people. I hate them just as much as you.
/r/MensRights13/11/15 07:53 PM
1

leftist politician You are aware that Trudeau is a centrist politician, right?
/r/MensRights23/10/15 06:37 PM
2

Not saying anything about this kid in particular, Then why did you phrase your initial comment as if the proposed situation would probably happen to this particular kid?
/r/MensRights25/09/15 10:05 PM
3

Often enough there are a lot of kids who are kicked out of school and/or sent to a gender therapist for shit like what that kid did. They're wrongly told they might be trans and end up buying it (and every single gram of mental baggage years down the road) when all they did was have long hair at a shitty school. The kid just wants long hair, but the school tells him it's only for girls, parents sometimes are in on it, and if you add a gender therapist into the mix, you're left with a very confus…
/r/MensRights25/09/15 09:58 PM
4

I did read the article. I didn't see anything in the article that justify: Kid's probably going to end up thinking he's a girl inside. Other than someone (aka you) incorrectly assuming that long hair = wants to be a girl.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 09:37 PM
4

Stereotypical metalheads (long hair, band shirts, denim vests covered in band patches, etc.) are all secretly trans now?
/r/MensRights25/09/15 09:20 PM
2

This is the equality that feminists want. FTFY.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 01:33 PM
1

They argue that the movement to promote women’s place in society has resulted in the demonisation of all men as sexist pigs at best, incipient rapists at worst. [...] Trying to argue that men have become a class of disfranchised nobodies is like trying to argue the sky is red because you don’t like the colour blue. I have a question. How does one make the leap from "a group is being demonised" to "a group is being oppressed"? Since something more than demonisation has to happen before a group be…
/r/MensRights31/01/15 07:33 PM
4

Canadian Football League.
/r/MensRights27/01/15 01:54 PM
2

You definitely not the only one, since I'm one also. If you're interested, check out /r/socialists. It might not be as active as /r/socialism but it isn't dominated by feminists.
/r/MensRights06/01/15 01:45 PM
2

The influence of MRA thinking was all over the recent story of Missouri state legislator Rick Brattin, who introduced a bill that would require women to get permission from the man who impregnated them in order to get an abortion. I'm not aware of any MRA that has advocated any such thing, so I can't think of a way the author could've made that connection other than pulling it out of her ass.
/r/MensRights26/12/14 02:27 PM
1

A tiny majority argued that it isn’t rape, but that the teacher should still face punishment. I hate being pendantic but 36.9% isn't a majority, even a tiny one. It can be better discribed as either a significant minority or, due to the other two options only getting 35.2% and 27.9%, a tiny plurality.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 09:05 PM
1

Crude? Yes. Sexist? Not at first glance.
/r/MensRights13/10/14 08:52 PM
5

In the Mankind Initiative video, it’s clear that the male victim isn’t in any physical danger. He could have easily defended himself against the woman, or he could have simply walked away. Can't the same be said about the female victim?
/r/MensRights15/09/14 11:29 PM
1

it's the way [women] are depicted and drawn that is a completely unrealistic vision And (stereotypical) male superheroes depicted as having more muscles than a weightlifter isn't unrealistic at all.
/r/MensRights09/09/14 05:27 PM
1

That square graph thing is just a Libertarian ad campaign. While the group that is most associated with it has several flaws (the biggest two (in my opinion) are assuming that criticism of corporations equals criticism of markets and placing conservative politicians (like Harper or Romney) so close to Mugabe on the Authoritarian scale), the basic idea of using a grid to show relative political position is sound.
/r/MensRights27/08/14 09:35 PM
3

I view many socialists in the same way.
/r/MensRights05/07/14 11:31 PM
1

I don't think it has passed the HoC either.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 12:59 PM
1

Technically, it is still a bill, not a law yet, since (AFAIK) it hasn't passed the Senate.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 12:47 PM
1

It basically means defence or justification.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 01:51 AM
1

I'm glad my MP voted in favour of the bill, even though I haven't voted him in the past and probably wouldn't vote for him.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 12:34 AM
13

Yeah, the author seems to have forgotten about equality under the law.
/r/MensRights18/05/14 07:34 PM
3

I would be supportive of polygamy if and only if the genders are treated equally (i.e. both genders can have multiple spouses of either gender), but since this law doesn't treat the genders equally, I'm not able to support it.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 02:22 PM
3

You have a very odd definition of extortion when it includes voluntarily hiring someone to work for you for a predefined wage that they agree to. When the worker (usually) has a choice of signing over a significant portion of the wealth he or she creates in a given time period or living over the streets, I think the word extortion would fall pretty close to the situation. But no, the funding could not come from aforementioned credit unions. Because the workers would never unite in the first plac…
/r/MensRights04/04/14 02:50 PM
2

They're not just going to GIVE it to you. You have to take it. By saying you want to enact policies, you are admitting that you have to take it by force. Not morally any better than a violent revolution, still theft. Since violent revolution requires the banishment or death of original governing group and its supporters and the way I suggested only requires the retaking of something gained via extortion, they aren't morally equal. So you have no idea how businesses work then. Because it sure as …
/r/MensRights04/04/14 11:40 AM
3

More like enact policies that aid the creation and growth of worker coops and credit unions and then let momentum take over. P.S. And I don't consider most of the current owners of the means of production to be the "rightful" owners (in a moral and/or justice sense, rather than legal sense) due to most of their wealth being extorted from the people responsible for its creation, the workers, so no moral qualms here (except over exact processes).
/r/MensRights03/04/14 09:35 PM
4

Not every socialist wants to follow the path set by the USSR, China, Cuba, etc. For instance, I consider myself a socialist and I want corporations and the like to be replaced by worker cooperatives and credit unions (and acheive this via the democratic process rather than revolution).
/r/MensRights03/04/14 06:01 PM
5

There are a few of us liberal MRM supporters, but we're few and far between because most liberals blindly follow feminism. Try being a socialist who sympathises with the MRM.
/r/MensRights28/03/14 10:52 PM
16

At Assembly, members argued that it would set a dangerous precedent to de-ratify a club on ideological grounds, while others argued that it would be premature to de-ratify the club based on future actions. At least there were people smart enough to see that at the Assembly. Edit: Forgot a word.
/r/MensRights24/03/14 05:16 PM
4

But it’s not clear if they are right to do so; there is no known causative link between consuming violent sexual images and committing violent sexual crimes. EVAW’s director Holly Dustin acknowledges this - but claims it is only because demonstrating such a connection would be unethical. “You can’t show boys pornography and then see if they rape someone.” But we can see how tight of a correlation there is between violent/extreme porn and sexual violence and if there is a tight correlation, then …
/r/MensRights25/02/14 02:41 PM
5

victims of police-reported family violence are predominantly female. In 2010, 7 in 10 (70%) victims of police-reported family violence were girls or women. Looking at rates, the risk of becoming a victim of police-reported family violence was more than twice as high for girls and women as it was for boys and men (407 per 100,000 versus 180 per 100,000). The rates are based on police reports and since men are usually not willing to admit to having been beaten up by a woman, so the rate of men bei…
/r/MensRights03/02/14 09:09 PM
3

If you know of a solution, does it use strategies akin to socialism? For the sake of clarity, what kind of strategies are you referring to?
/r/MensRights21/01/14 01:30 AM
3

Triply nice for it to be a (relatively) mainstream socialist.
/r/MensRights21/01/14 12:40 AM
1

If a child is nipped by a dog on one blames them for fearing other dogs. That is because children have a tendency to overgeneralize (just look at their use of the past tense, they often use the suffix "-ed" for irregular verbs like "go").
/r/MensRights07/01/14 04:43 PM
0

1) And that doesn't mean that the aforementioned issues fall within that overlap. 2) Sources for feminist organizations actually trying to men's issues caused by the patriarchy?
/r/MensRights02/01/14 12:52 AM
1

You are aware I said "the feminist part" and not "the socialist part," right?
/r/MensRights02/01/14 12:34 AM
-28

I would believe the feminist part if they actually try to solve those issues.
/r/MensRights01/01/14 10:00 PM
3

You do know communism and socialism aren't synonymous, right?
/r/MensRights01/01/14 08:48 PM
3

But in a socialist economy I would not be allowed to own a factory and employ people. I'm not seeing what your preference for coops and credit unions has to do with that. My support for worker cooperatives comes from the workers are the ones who are mixing their labour with the raw materials (and machinery if you wish to extend the line to that) thus making the products theirs. And my support for credit unions comes from wanting the workers to have a bit more control over their wealth. As well, …
/r/MensRights01/01/14 01:05 AM
3

It lead me to support an economy made up of worker cooperatives and credit unions (with government handling things like healthcare) and since market socialism was the closest label that fit...
/r/MensRights01/01/14 12:05 AM
2

Depending on the exact model/variant, the companies/enterprises would either be directly owned and operated by the people who work at them (like worker cooperatives) and the profits goes directly to them or they'll be state-owned enterprises and the profits distributed via a social dividend, while in capitalism, the profits would go to anyone who invested money.
/r/MensRights31/12/13 11:34 PM
1

Those also don't disqualify trying other variants like market socialism.
/r/MensRights31/12/13 11:02 PM
-4

Well, I'm an "individualist" (or whatever you want to call it) and a socialist. I became a socialist via extending Locke's ownership theory (mixing one's labour with unclaimed resources is the basis of ownership).
/r/MensRights31/12/13 11:01 PM
5

Only one variant of socialism (Marxism-Leninism) has been tried, so it would seem illogical(?) to throw away every other variant before trying them.
/r/MensRights31/12/13 10:32 PM
3

The woman [...] gained the support of the boy's mother after denying having sexual contact with him, What the fuck?
/r/MensRights22/12/13 03:12 AM
30

Judge Anna Johns told Hale she considered the offending just as serious as a man sexually abusing a young girl. Well, that's a start.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 03:28 AM
3

Men are the dominant gender in our society. So the Normans in England wouldn't have been discriminated against by the Saxons based on their ethnicity after 1066 since they were the dominant ethnicity in England. These are facts just as it is a fact that there is massive wealth disparity in our society, and that those in positions of power reflect and seek to maintain that state of affairs. I'm pretty sure capitalism is a bigger factor in that disparity than "patriarchy". Admittedly, it is diffic…
/r/MensRights04/12/13 05:42 PM
1

Did you look under the second video?
/r/MensRights05/11/13 02:50 AM
3

A levels saw 8% of boys get top grade of A* compared to 7.4% of girls Wait, they're complaining about a 0.6% difference.
/r/MensRights27/10/13 11:53 PM
-5

The socialist subreddits are sadly infected by feminists, who seem to hate MRA's passionately. Maybe we could start a socialist subreddit that isn't dominated by feminists.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 07:42 PM
1

Plus when is being right and wanting dialogue mutually exclusive?
/r/MensRights19/09/13 08:12 PM
2

In July, Men’s Rights Edmonton (MR-E) made headlines across the country with a ‘Don’t be that Girl’ poster campaign mirroring the Edmonton Police’s ‘Don’t be that Guy’ campaign. At least the writer didn't use the word 'parody' (since it would imply an attempt at humour [on the part of those who created the posters]).
/r/MensRights18/09/13 12:43 AM
4

Since it is MSNBC, I'm surprised they even invited her.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 01:49 AM
2

I got an idea. Have the pre-conviction anonymity and three possible verdicts (with variations/exceptions for self-defence and the like): 1) Guilty: the evidence clearly shows that the accused did it 2) Innocent: the evidence clearly shows that the accused didn't do it 3) Not Proven: the evidence isn't clear one way or the other.
/r/MensRights12/09/13 09:22 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter