| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | On a thread comparing abortion to a vasectomy..."You have never and likely will never have legislation designed to remove your right to bodily autonomy." Lady, most of us have had their genitals mutilated the day we were born and the legality of that isn't even up for debate. They don't even know how good they have it. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 23/08/22 04:24 PM |
| 7 | It's called Male genital mutilation.A study funded by American healthcsre Providers, who literally have a financial incentive to continue MGM. European healthcare organisations universally reject it and are calling for bans. Bro, MGM was first introduced by the Kellog guy to reduce pleasure from masturbating because he thought it was sinful. An intact guy can't have his glans just touching his underwear all day like we are, that is insanely uncomfortable for them. Like I'm sorry people are shaming you for your dick and I think it'… | /r/MensRights | 27/04/22 06:17 AM |
| 6 | It's called Male genital mutilation.Would you have said the same thing to a woman who was mutilated? Your comment is quite honestly disgusting. There is nothing to be proud of. I was violated as an innocent child. | /r/MensRights | 27/04/22 06:06 AM |
| 12 | It's called Male genital mutilation.Removing healthy body parts without medical indication is mutilation by definition. It is medically supported in the U.S., not in Europe, where it is universally admonished by medical organizations. It was introduced in the U.S. by Kellog, who saw masturbation as a problem and thought MGM would curb this. Do Europeans have issues with their intact foreskins? Are young European men rushing to get circumcized because of its purported medical benefits? There is also a financial incentive for MGM in… | /r/MensRights | 26/04/22 02:29 PM |
| 12 | It's called Male genital mutilation.It's mostly affected me psychologically, but also physically. As I said, it distresses me greatly, to the point I used to have suicidal thoughts because of it. It is a loss of control about my own body. If I was left intact, I would not have the great mental distress that comes with it and I would be more comfortable in my own body. The relationship to my parents and extended family has also been severely negatively impacted by this custom (Muslim background). I am also more distant from my cult… | /r/MensRights | 26/04/22 02:17 PM |
| 9 | It's called Male genital mutilation.Which statistics would that be? | /r/MensRights | 26/04/22 01:27 PM |
| 13 | It's called Male genital mutilation.Because it is a choice for MY body that has been made by SOMEONE ELSE. I would have like to decide for myself what happens with my body. I believe it negatively affected my psyche and the way I look at my body. It was not medically necessary and it is a cruel thing to do to a child, who cannot consent. If you take a look at the wikipedia page for FGM, I feel exactly the same way that those who survived FGM feel. | /r/MensRights | 26/04/22 01:26 PM |
| 10 | It's called Male genital mutilation.Your opinion is valid, but it only reflects your own experience. I am not denying your experience. What I am saying is that a significant portion of mutilated men do not feel the same way as you. I am actively restoring my foreskin, so I talk to many guys who feel like me on the subject and many of them do say that sex was better when they were intact. Their experiences are valid too. Even if it was just 10% of guys feeling this way, that's still too many. People will go through the same thing w… | /r/MensRights | 26/04/22 01:23 PM |
| 16 | It's called Male genital mutilation.Guess what, if you cannot present logical counterarguments, then you may be civil, but you're not engaging in discourse. I would love to hear your rational argumenta on why you would be disagreeing with me. | /r/MensRights | 26/04/22 12:17 PM |
| 19 | It's called Male genital mutilation.I personally do not. Why don't we just let people decide for themselves. An adult can always get cut if they have been left intact, but you can't glue your foreskin back on when you did not want it to happen. | /r/MensRights | 26/04/22 12:10 PM |
| 25 | It's called Male genital mutilation.You only get downvoted and ridiculed if you use your own positive experience with it as an argument to perpetuate the mutilation of minors. I am sure many women who are survivors of FGM have no problem with it either, since they are the ones doing it to their daughters, but that does not mean that the practice is morally acceptable. Just use logical thinking. Nobody has ever been getting downvoted for saying: "I have been cut and I am not bothered by it, but I realize that others may not have th… | /r/MensRights | 26/04/22 12:08 PM |
| 3 | Should I get a restraining order?Any contract that is illegal is null and void. This is also why you can't sign a contract that allows someone to kill you. You can't sign away child support responsibilities because child support is paid for the benefit of the child by the state and can thus not be signed away. This is basic legal knowledge and spreading this type of misinformation can be very damaging to someone's life | /r/MensRights | 04/02/22 02:12 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter