TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Secret_Worlder1992 Archive

View 0 posts and 204 comments by Secret_Worlder1992 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

She doesn't deserve it. Trust me.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/25 01:43 PM
–

The mods are all her besties. They enable this shit deliberately.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/25 05:47 AM
–

It's not fucking fair. Men here have to tread on eggshells constantly. Meanwhile this semi-literate gorilla gets to run her mouth nonstop, completely unabated. Why? Because the dried-up old cunnies who run this sub are her besties. Hell, she is one of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/25 05:05 AM
1

Status is irrelevant with accompanying looks and/or money. If all you have is status, sure, women will say that they love you, but then they'll still go home with the guys they actually like.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/25 04:25 AM
–

Please tell he was also broke, autistic and Indian. Tell me lies, tell me sweet, little lies...
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 02:00 AM
4

Worse. He thinks you can tell the truth.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 01:57 AM
4

Dude, hoping for honesty from the women here is like hoping for charity from Ebeneezer Scrooge. What are you doing?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 01:56 AM
–

Jesus, how many more of these are we gonna have to endure?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 03:07 PM
9

And I've been reminding you of the Halo Effect and its implications for almost as long. People just don't listen. Whatcha gonna do?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 12:30 PM
0

Social proof without the looks makes you an easy mark - not a desirable partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 12:12 PM
2

Literally how the system functions atm - men like me are expected to pay up, women like you are expected to sit and collect.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/25 11:21 PM
0

So long as I'm not expected to pay for your welfare, that's alright by me.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/25 10:36 PM
2

Oh, yeah? Well, we don't like being subjected to your diatribes every other day, yet here we are. Life's not perfect, you're just gonna have to learn to live with it. If the ick you get from men complaining is so unbearable to you, r/TwoXChromosomes is right here. Feel free to leave any time you like.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/25 08:45 PM
2

Impossible to tell. I was ostracized by my peers beginning at about grade 5, missed a lot of key developmental milestones. Had to resort to the Internet, porn and eventually sex workers to fill in the blanks, so to speak. Not exactly ideal, I know, but that was the only option on the table. That might've played a part in it. But honestly, I don't think it really matters at this point.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/25 06:07 PM
3

Bro, dating coaches are scammers. You don't need speech therapy either unless you've got an actual impediment. Just pay for it, get it out of your system. That's how it used to be, and I would argue that's how it should be. Very few men can elicit genuine attraction in women - and if you're not one of those fortunate few, then sex is a service to be bought and paid for. No amount of cuck-dancing will change that. The choice is quite simple, really: spend your money and preserve your dignity, los…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/25 05:33 PM
9

Honestly, we need a thread like this for "emotional intelligence" or whatever they're calling it this week. See if we can coral all the women of the sub there - let them larp, pretending they're sapiosexual until they tucker themselves out. Maybe then we can have some actual conversations for a change.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/25 05:21 PM
0

Outside of (possibly) mitigating some of the bullying, there's very little reward for being sociable while still being unattractive. At least, if you're a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/25 08:45 PM
-1

The difference is there's no collective effort on the part of society to gaslight women into believing otherwise. There is for men, and you are party to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/25 08:41 PM
1

So, everything about you being a chad is obviously false, else you wouldn't be here. But I agree with overarching point. If anything, you're too optimistic - most men's romantic lives are decided in the first trimester.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/25 08:36 PM
3

*Putting on my best J.K. Simmons impression* "That's the neat part, you don't."
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/25 02:48 PM
7

It's a meaningless platitude. A polite way to dismiss men's grievances and tell them to sort it out themselves. To answer your point though: I would much rather be a prized object than a tool. No amount of male agency - which is also largely a fantasy - will offset the security and validation even a mediocre woman will get just by default.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/25 01:49 PM
–

If it's any comfort to you, these are all middle-aged women hanging out at a forum where the median male user is 15-25 years their junior. What do you think their lives are like? There are no Stacies here, that's for sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/25 12:45 PM
–

That's the trouble though, there is no longer any debate here - it can't occur because you won't allow it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/25 12:09 PM
–

The women here are a millstone around the neck of the community. We'd be better off as a male-only sub, tbh.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/25 11:26 AM
1

Again, you have to data, but you're missing the context - women "more likely to message men in their own league"? Since when do women on dating apps message anyone? Again, the information here is being presented to paint women in as flattering a light as possible. Writing "yo, what's up?" doesn't take much more effort than swiping. It's pretty much zero effort with next-to-zero chance of return. These men know the women they're messaging are out of their league, they know they're not likely to g…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/25 06:22 PM
1

See, this what happens when you have data but can't interpret it properly. Men message every woman they see, that's the optimal strategy as a man on dating websites - you can't extrapolate anything from that tidbit alone. That last part about men not messaging women in their own league is total fiction, probably an embellishment by the women who relayed this information to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/25 03:15 PM
–

Yup, this is bait.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/25 02:10 AM
2

From my own observations, I've seen nothing to suggest men have an exaggerated opinion of their own league, but ok.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/25 08:27 PM
2

Source?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/25 06:47 PM
7

Intellectual cowardice. In that respect, NT and ND women are much the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/25 02:53 PM
16

Autism, even in its more severe forms, doesn't really seem to impact women's romantic prospects in any significant way. To even suggest it does is to do a disservice to autistic men who are actually struggling.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/25 06:50 PM
5

Is grok a verb now? If so, then fine, grok you too. But it doesn't, that's the thing. Because the way women - and men for that matter - interpret behaviour is almost solely determined by the attractiveness of the individual in question Already asked/brought up and answered/addressed.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/25 06:49 PM
5

I was speaking figuratively, but if that wasn't clear enough to you I'll spell it out. It doesn't matter if you're asking a question that's already been asked and answered, or bringing up a point that's been already been brought up and addressed, the issue here is the same - we've dealt with this. Move on already. But it does. Don't you see? You think you're not attracted to men because they're awkward, but it's not true. It's the exact opposite - they come off as awkward to you because they're …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/25 06:38 PM
8

It's called the Halo Effect. You can keep asking the same question over and over again as much as you like, the answer will always be the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/25 06:09 PM
3

I'll take "shit no one ever said" for 200, Alex.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/25 08:07 PM
-3

No, not at all. Honestly, if I wasn't expected to pay for your welfare, I'd be perfectly content just smashing prozzies and letting you go off to do... whatever the fuck it is that you do.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 02:38 PM
1

No, welfare freed women. And even then, not really, because most of them still end up in relationships with men they're not attracted to.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 02:32 PM
–

Pretty much. Every female dating woe is self-inflicted.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 01:33 PM
-3

And most of you still choose to shack up with partners you're not attracted, because being a prostitute is still better than having to work for a living. The more things change, the more they stay the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 01:29 PM
1

Best I can gather, your claim seems to be that he's "below average" because he is distrustful, which is a complete non-sequitur. What else have you got? No, he can't do "whatever he wants", because in the realm of dating and relationships he has no options. Being incel is not an option. The name is a dead giveaway. Asking for assurances from your partner is not asking for power over them. This is just gaslighting.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/25 07:51 AM
1

Why is he not average though? Because you say so? Power requires leverage. He has none.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/25 07:31 AM
1

No, Average Bob is very much average, and average men have zero power in relationships. That's the problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/25 07:19 AM
–

Also irrelevant to the point at hand.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 07:55 PM
–

None of that touches on my original point - men are attracted to the women they settle for, women are not. Whether men are more desperate or more libidinous is immaterial here.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 06:30 PM
–

No, they are. If they weren't, the relationship would've never happened in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 05:14 PM
–

Also men are still attracted to the women they ultimately settle for, the same is not true for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 05:03 PM
-1

I agree with this to an extent. If you're 20+ and a virgin, you need to take a trip to Vegas. No ifs, ands or buts.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/25 09:14 PM
–

It literally is. It's genetic death - I'm just waiting for it to find me.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/25 08:52 PM
12

Not when the alternative is inceldom. That's like saying getting out of the road is "a choice" when there's a truck careening towards you. Girls don't "shoot their shot" because they don't have to. Relationships are a passive/reactive affair for them. They have choices.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/25 08:50 PM
16

Men have no agency in this instance. We shoot our shot and hope we get chosen. That's it. I have no power, and therefore no responsibility.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/25 08:45 PM
21

Being incel is not a choice. The name's a dead giveaway.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/25 08:42 PM
30

Except there's one problem - men don't choose.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/25 08:38 PM
3

If you're expecting the women here to answer honestly, I've got a bridge to sell you.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/25 11:20 AM
-1

I don't disagree that men should lie about their lack of experience, but you're grossly underestimating how difficult it is to find "practice girlfriend". Even below-average women nowadays are strutting around like they're 10s - I mean, just look at the women on this board.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/25 11:12 AM
2

Nobody refers to the Complete Package as husband material though.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/25 03:54 PM
2

I did not claim it was a perfect solution. Realistically, male loneliness is always going to be a thing and it's likely to get worse in the coming years. All we can do is try to ameliorate the situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/25 05:06 AM
-4

Bro, I'mma say it - bring back initiations. When a boy turns 18, he gets a government voucher to visit a sex worker. No guy is going to college or entering the workforce without first getting their v-card punched. They've earned it. Not even kidding btw. A programme like this would do more good for boys and men than any amount of therapy.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/25 02:03 AM
-3

No therapy. Therapy is for people with made-up problems.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/25 01:59 AM
29

If you're out of college without ever having gone on a date, I would say that is unusual - then again, maybe not. It is becoming increasingly the norm for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 11:04 PM
3

If your boyfriend was tall, handsome, whatever, you wouldn't be on r/PurplePillDebate.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 06:17 PM
1

Irrelevant. Every woman there is flooded with attention
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/25 11:08 PM
16

No, the OkCupid data just confirmed what everyone already knew.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 10:58 PM
4

It is a ludicrous theory. Iirc the data says Republicans have more sex on average. You don't need to be liberal or conservative to get laid, you just need to be hot.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/25 01:08 AM
0

Wow, how long did it take you to reach that brilliant conclusion? Newsflash: everyone here is fucking miserable. The men want to be in relationships, but can't because we're not attractive enough. Meanwhile, the women are in relationships with men they're not attracted to, and have a permanent chip on their shoulder because of it. Everything is fucked, everybody sucks.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/25 07:20 PM
–

Look, Lilith, I understand you're upset that the state docked your benefits, and that the KFC keeps turning down your food stamps - but understand that's not our fault, you can't keep inflicting your verbal diarrhoea on us. This is not acceptable behaviour.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/25 02:16 PM
8

You know, Elliot Rodger said in his manifesto that he wanted to strike out against all of womankind, to inflict them with mental scars that would never heal. Reading posts like this I can't help but wonder if, in some small way, he didn't succeed - even if the women still talking about him 11 fucking years after the fact are about as far removed from the blond Stacies he obsessed over as can be.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/25 01:40 AM
–

This is a positive development imo. They gave you nothing - give them nothing in return.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/25 12:58 AM
–

It'll increasingly become the purview of highly-attractive men, even more so than it is already. Part of me already suspects involuntary celibacy is really the norm, and I suspect (hope?) in the coming years it will become impossible to conceal that fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/25 12:55 AM
1

I'm literally asking you questions, and you're refusing to answer.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/25 09:08 PM
0

I think you and I have different ideas of what an "emotional reaction" entails, but ok. What pattern is that exactly? I just told you, the type of people you described in your OP are statistical outliers. You didn't even try to argue that. You want to know what motivates them? Is that what this is about? I already told you the main one, though I concede there can be other aggravating factors. Mental illness is one, which seems to have been at play here. Bullying and social rejection by your peer…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/25 09:05 PM
0

So what exactly is the point of the thread? What are you trying to ascertain? 'Cuz right now this just seems like a very thinly veiled excused to poo-poo on men you don't like.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/25 08:53 PM
2

Strange. I don't recall you making a thread when that poor Ukrainian girl got shanked in the subway. I guess that story just didn't pique your interest the same way. Could it be that the perpetrator there didn't evoke the same visceral disgust in you as the "groypers"? Well, no matter. Let's try to get some mileage out of this before you inevitably throw your toys of the pram. I believe I addressed this point before in one of our previous convos, but amiability is not a desirable trait in men. I…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/25 06:34 PM
4

They're monkeys desperately trying to convince themselves and others they're something more than that - all is fair in the pursuit of quality genes for your offspring.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/25 05:48 PM
2

I’m interested in what’s going on for a suburban kid from a Christian two parent well-to-do household to behave as if he’s an ironic Gotham villain. And why is this particular topic of so much interest to you, when "suburban kids from Christian two-parent households" who go postal are still statistical outliers, and the few that do exist account for so such an infinitesimally small percentage of violence in the US?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/25 05:45 PM
-6

And let me guess - you think you're one of the girls and not just some weird eunuch sideshow they keep around for their amusement? That's precious.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/25 09:39 PM
2

I'll happily take option A provided I no longer have to pay for your welfare.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/25 09:35 PM
1

Or they're just milking some desperate sod for all his worth without offering anything in return.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/25 09:32 PM
3

There's no such thing as sapiosexuality. It's a ludicrous notion created by LVWs to justify engaging in a "soft" form of prostitution by partnering up with men they're not attracted to. Sexuality is physical.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 08:21 PM
0

Exactly how it looks now. You're presuming women don't already hold absolute power in dating and relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 05:21 PM
2

How am I misconstruing your point? You didn't even try to refute my claim that the women in these relationships are not attracted to their partners, you just said you think it's morally justified. Which, yeah, no shit. You think any woman's actions - no matter how reprobate - are always justified. That's not the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 02:56 PM
2

So, yes, these relationships are just an elaborate form of prostitution. These women are effectively sex workers, they are not and have never been attracted to their partners. Thank you.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 02:36 PM
3

So you recognize the majority of men getting hitched in their 30s who didn't get any during their younger years - their relationships are predicated on the exchange of material resources? Meaning their wives are not actually attracted to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 03:58 AM
3

Nah, that's a ludicrous hypothesis. Very few people look better in their 30s than they did when they were 19, and the ones that do still don't look that great - their "glow up" doesn't really amount to much.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/25 11:00 PM
-1

Rare for men, non-existent in women.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/25 05:37 PM
4

If she were a man, she would've been permabanned years ago, but she's a woman - so the rules don't apply to her. Here's hoping she keels over from diabetes soon and we don't have to deal with her clogging up the feed like she clogs up the toilet at KFC.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/25 05:20 PM
2

My experience is that women are very much a monolith - mentally and emotionally, they're homogeneous to the point where they're almost indistinguishable from one another.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 11:32 PM
–

Men are more likely to project their own wants and desires onto others - she says after posting eighteen-hundred threads about how struggling men should forego romantic relationships in favour of same-sex friendships and find fulfilment that way, because that's what women do.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 02:52 AM
2

For hot guys, dating is dating - as in actual romance. For ugly guys, yeah, "dating" is just a form of prostitution with extra steps.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 08:59 PM
1

This is usually the part where you try to defend your thesis statement.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 07:53 PM
1

No, I think mammalians perceive females "wonderfully" because they are subconsciously aware that "females are the bottleneck to mammalian reproduction". This all should be rather intuitive. I'm not sure exactly what you want me to unpack.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 07:38 PM
1

The "women are wonderful" effect endures because women are the bottleneck to human reproduction, and for no other reason whatsoever. Spoiler: that also happens to be why women have an in-group bias - well, that plus female homogeneity and lack of intrasexual competition. It has nothing to do with being endearing. Amiability is not desirable trait in men, else they would have evolved to be more amiable.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 04:56 PM
2

I'm 6 ft 3 and conventionally attractive myself, 41 but look 30, If any of this were true, you wouldn't be here.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 04:28 PM
1

What's with the awkward phrasing? Why use the word knowledgeability instead of just education? Are you trying to imply something?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/25 09:17 PM
1

Yes, it is just because they're physically attractive. Try being an asshole without the looks to back it up, see how that turns out for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 11:39 PM
7

They want to draw some use out of them. If you're a guy being told to "be kind", you're obviously not fit as a mate in their eyes - the least you can do is serve as a utility.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 12:06 AM
2

No demographic of women is hated by society. At worst, they are ignored.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/25 02:51 PM
3

Not, the problem is not having good looks. Being likable without good looks just makes you liable to get taken advantage of.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/25 12:42 PM
11

Women with attractive husbands don't cheat on them. Attractive men will probably cheat, even if their wives are also attractive, but do it on the down low. They don't engage in any of this poly bullshit - which is really just an avenue for low-value women to try to branch swing.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 09:29 PM
1

It's not that they're bored of the relationship, they were just never physically attracted to their partner to begin with.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 09:27 PM
–

A welfare queen then. Oh, joy...
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 08:43 PM
–

You really struggled with that one, didn't you? It doesn't even make sense in the context of the conversation.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 08:36 PM
–

If you're not doing it already, you will soon enough. You're all the same, all carbon copies of one another. Every last one of you.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 08:26 PM
–

Because you wanted someone to pay your bills, so you could get off work and sit on ass all day doing nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 08:15 PM
11

Those women are not attracted to their husbands.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 07:59 PM
–

Unsurprising. Most women end up marrying men they were never attracted to.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 07:58 PM
1

Because men don't choose women.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 01:46 PM
1

When you use money to get casual sex, that's not casual sex. That's prostitution.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 11:40 AM
3

I think you got yourself a little mixed up. First, you get your cheeks clapped in an argument, then you accuse us all of being autistic.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 05:01 AM
–

Maybe. Try asking somewhere else though - you won't find those women here.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 12:25 AM
–

"Husband material" is female douplespeak for "desperate uggo that pays my bills".
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/25 12:35 PM
0

Hugh Hefner was a hunk in his youth, man. Don't know what you're talking about. When he became older, and wasn't so handsome anymore, he paid for it - same as all of these guys. Listen, with enough money, you can have truckloads of willing women delivered to your doorstep, have them all lined up next to one another, naked on their hands and knees, and then go through them one by one like breeding sows. Hell, for a little extra, you can even get them in a gestation crate and have them go "Oink! O…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/25 09:00 PM
3

But you're not getting it, you'll never get it - and it is just that you don't get it..
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/25 07:47 AM
4

You still don't understand. You don't deserve to be adored - Stacy is adored, and you're not Stacy. I'm not sure how I can make this any clearer.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/25 10:00 PM
3

You realize what I said applies to you too, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/25 08:16 PM
9

No, that's the problem. Evidently you do expect Stacy treatment when, let's be real here - if you're on r/PurplePillDebate, you probably don't even qualify as Beckies.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/25 07:35 PM
19

I could just as easily redirect that back at you - none of the women here are Stacies, not a single one, including you. Yet they still expect the same treatment. What's up with that?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/25 07:00 PM
4

No, I'm not just gonna think about something else. I'm frustrated, and I want to express it. If that's too much for you to bear, r/TwoXChromosomes is thatta away. You're free to date whoever you like, so long as I'm not expected to pay for your welfare.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 02:33 PM
1

Fuckboys have no trouble finding sex or relationships, provided they are physically attractive. Also, there's no such thing as Beta Fucks - never was, never will be.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 01:56 PM
1

Hello, welcome to r/PurplePillDebate.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/25 08:32 AM
2

In spite of the mods' best efforts, interesting conversation topic still crop up every so often. It also provides ample opportunity to put uppity low-value women in their place, which is cathartic.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/25 03:19 AM
2

This does not happen. In order for a man to get with a woman, he must first actively pursue her - we do not simply consent to relationships the way women do. With that in mind, why would we expend time and effort courting a woman we're not attracted to?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/25 03:03 PM
1

We'd be crawling in our own shit if not for male thirst.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/25 09:19 AM
1

No.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 11:50 PM
1

How I wish that were so.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 09:35 PM
2

Easy answer: don't settle and let me opt out of paying for your welfare.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 12:17 PM
38

It's not about your value as a human being, or whatever you're going on about - it's about satisfying a base need. Without escorts, I'd still be a virgin at the ripe old age of 33. As a sub-5 man, my sexual market value is zero, nothing I do can change that. So what if hookers don't care about me, my hopes or my struggles? You think other women do? I'm a malfunctioning worker drone as far as they're concerned.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 07:45 PM
–

That's not the point I'm addressing.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 12:44 AM
–

A byproduct. We don't want to sleep with tons of women to impress other men - again, that's the Femborg Collective speaking.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 12:40 AM
–

The unfortunate truth is that men will partner up with women they don't like at all if they have no other option because just being in proximity to a woman is seen as impressive. Female projection. Unlike you, we dgaf what the hivemind thinks of us.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 12:37 AM
3

It's not that simple. Sure, chad can get dates on Tinder easily, but even then a lot of women aren't dtf right away. They wanna meet up, they wanna talk, all that rigamarole. It's faster this way.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 12:06 AM
8

You underestimate how strenuous courtship rituals can be, even for Chad.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/25 11:34 PM
–

I'm surprised so many of them are white tbh.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/25 06:45 AM
0

It's called romanticization of the foreign.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/25 02:54 PM
8

Just fucking laughing. Also self-reported rates mean nothing here. We all know what the self-reported rates for depression are, and what the actual suicide stats are - men like to put on a brave face, women like exaggerate their woes, or make them up wholesale.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/25 02:48 PM
-1

It's a not an American thing, it's a man thing - and we're cool with it. We don't want that kind of relationship with our male friends.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/25 02:44 PM
15

An alternative explanation is that women are never truly alone unless they choose to be. Also jfl at the claim that "loneliness rates are similar".
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/25 02:41 PM
-2

Of she is far, far below average - meaning he's still way out of her league.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/25 08:26 PM
2

My experience is that, excluding their immediate relatives, women only tolerate 3 types of men in their social circle - chads, (figurative) eunuchs, and their friends' partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 07:02 PM
1

You might not date him, but you do end up marrying him sooner or later.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 12:33 AM
3

Women don't care. In their eyes, prostitutes are scabs undermining their control over the sex supply.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/25 01:34 AM
-1

And given enough time, another sub would pop up to replace it. At least it would be fun while it lasted.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 08:48 PM
0

Tell me you're frigid without telling me you're frigid.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/25 09:58 PM
2

If you haven't figured out what women think, you're either very young or just haven't been paying attention. They're not subtle about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/25 07:58 PM
27

The female hivemind sees the median man as a 2.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/25 06:27 PM
3

So because you got an 8 or a 9 to nut in you, that means you're automatically an 8 or a 9? Is that what you're saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/25 06:27 PM
1

Ok, first off, there's no such thing as compulsive libido or reactive libido - there's just libido period. It's only male by default because most women don't have it. On a similar vein, sex is sex. You either like it or you don't, and most women don't. And again, if you feel genuine physical attraction to your partner you can't at the same time expect me to believe having sex with them is so strenuous and burdensome that you deserve a special treat - even if you're not raring and ready to go. Th…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/25 05:33 PM
0

What biological realities? That the vast majority women are not attracted to their partners? Yeah, I know that. That's kinda my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/25 04:34 PM
0

I literally just explained to you (again) why you should care about what these men think, unless you're content to just be a wet hole as I mentioned. In which case, have at it.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/25 04:33 PM
1

I'm gonna say it again, hopefully this time it sticks: If the thought of being intimate with someone is so incredibly off-putting to you that you feel you should be specially recompensed for it, that usually means you're not attracted to that person. I'm not sure what other conclusion you could draw from that.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/25 03:09 PM
1

That doesn't make sense. You can't have it both ways - you can't on the one hand tell me you're genuinely attracted to your partner, while also expecting me to believe having "duty sex" with them is so onerous to you that you deserve special compensation - any more than your partner deserves special compensation for getting up and going to work every day so he can provide for you and your children.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/25 02:54 PM
1

Following this line of reasoning to its logical conclusion, women must - they simply must - admit that they're not attracted to their partner. Which I'm honestly ok with, but they have to do it in order to maintain any sort of intellectual consistency.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/25 02:36 PM
1

Following this line of reasoning to its logical conclusion, women must - they simply must - admit that they're not attracted to their partner. Which I'm honestly I'm ok with.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/25 02:36 PM
1

I'm not trolling her by pointing out being sought after for sex as a woman doesn't mean she's special or particularly attractive, I'm educating her. Men's opinions matter when the men that you - and every other woman, for that matter - want to be with know their own worth, and they know the worth of the women trying to get women. You and your besties may exist in a perpetual circlerub where you all gaslight one other and tell each one you're all 10s, but you're not, you're 4s. And those guys? Th…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/25 02:30 PM
1

No, but see, that's the thing. You don't have to be special or particularly attractive as a woman to be successful in dating. Also wtf? I literally just explained why and how men's opinions mattered. Are you tagging in for the other girl? Was she a little too shellshocked from my previous reply, so the sisterhood sent you to squabble with me instead?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/25 01:10 PM
-2

Oh, but men's opinions very much do matter in this instance. You see, those 9s you're talking to who? They know what they're worth, and they know what you're worth. They've had 4s like you pining for them their entire lives - And yeah, they'll fuck as many of those 4s as they can because they're men, and men crave sexual variety. Doesn't mean they think you're special, or even especially attractive. You're a wet hole for them bust a nut into. When they choose to commit to someone, if they ever d…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/25 03:37 AM
-4

Plot twist: they think they already are. They're 4s who think they're 8 talking to 9s who they think are 6s.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/25 10:26 PM
–

According to society, women are entitled to men's labor. See: social security.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 02:24 AM
1

It really is. For some guys, finding out about transwomen was like discovering Shangri-La. For others, it ruined their lives, like... unironically.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 01:15 AM
1

The type of incident that gets you 25 to life. Need I say more? If you're the type of guy who gets off to trans porn then you're probably not the type of guy who objects to having sex with a transwoman on principle, so there's that. Watching it and actually doing it are definitely not the same though. There are some stories of guys who also watched trans porn getting a little overwhelmed during their first encounter with an actual transwoman - they didn't result in any incidents, at least to my …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 01:09 AM
1

They're a great substitute good if and only if you can make the mental leap - don't try if you can't, it's like trying to force yourself to be gay. I know several guys who, after years of struggling with biological women, decided to try their luck with transwomen. They report pretty positive experiences by in large. Two important caveats though: Number one, you have to be able to get into the right headspace as mentioned above. If the thought of having sex with someone who was born a man is enou…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/25 11:55 PM
1

You don't have to be the top 25% of looks. However, being the bottom 25% will probably be an immediate deal breaker. The problem is if you're not in the top 20% of looks, you're basically a 2 in the eyes of the median woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/25 02:21 PM
1

Yeah, but usually you have to wait more than a couple days before reposting a thread, lest it gets pulled down for spam. Don't worry though, you're one of the girls - rules don't apply to you on this board.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/25 11:10 AM
5

Since you are, by your own admission, just reposting the same thread you posted - what, like, 3 or 4 days ago? - and the mods aren't doing dick about it because you're one of their besties, I'm just gonna go ahead and repost the same answer I gave there: When men are fathering childen in their late 30s, 40s or even 50s, it's usually not by choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/25 11:02 AM
1

It's not just you. What I said applies to pretty much every woman here without exception - you don't operate as individuals; each one of you is a tendril sprouting from the same shoggoth. You know what you said, I know what you said, everyone here knows what you said. And no, I'm not gonna go through the trouble of digging through your history to find a specific example of you saying it. You asked why the men here accuse you of just world fallacy - this is why, and they're right to do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 11:56 AM
4

We're not playing this game. You know exactly what you said.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 05:00 PM
13

You're tilting at windmills right now. No one here tried to argue that - well, at least no man has. Obviously, if someone is chronically lonely it's because they're unattractive in some fashion. The question here is why - why are they so unappealing to the exact sex? The men here seem to have assessed - correctly, I might add - that, almost invariably, when a man struggles with chronic loneliness it is due to some bodily deficit. While you and the rest of the women here actively try to gaslight …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 02:41 PM
0

I don't wanna hold hands with men, I don't wanna kiss them, I don't wanna do anything with them. I want a female partner, or I'm not contributing.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 07:52 AM
1

I don't want to gather with men, I want a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 07:48 AM
-3

Bro, honest to God, you need to take a trip to Vegas. I swear I'm not being facetious here, it'll do wonders for you. Incidentally, if you're wondering why this post isn't wasn't pulled for blackpill content, it's because the women who run this midden heap of a board encourage this line of thinking. The want you to quit and suffer quietly so you can get back to work and pay for their welfare, like the good little worker drone you are.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/25 07:59 AM
0

But they don't have to accept it, that's the point. They can get a woman the same way most men throughout history have - by purchasing her. It just takes them longer to arraign the funds now.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 07:53 PM
0

And all of those would change their situation if given the choice, right? These men found a remedy to theirs, even if it's far from ideal. Who are you tell them to "just suck it up"? Heck, they've been "sucking it up" their entire lives. They've earned a fucking reprieve.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 04:48 PM
3

No, I'm tired. You shouldn't be here.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 04:34 PM
5

It didn't "slip from their fingers", it was never within their reach - until now, that is. What? I have to accept I'm a genetic dead end because Mary the Minge thought she was too good for me 15 years ago? Lol, how about no? >Sounds like long term prostitution and surrogacy, not love. Yikes. Yup, that's exactly what it is. A lot relationships are like that, actually, just prostitution with extra steps. It's not pretty, but for a lot of guys, it's the only thing on offer.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 04:25 PM
1

If you need it explained to you, you wouldn't understand and probably shouldn't be on this board tbh.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 04:08 PM
4

You're right. You don't understand.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 04:05 PM
5

Is it man's fault that he wasn't born one of the blessed few that could impress a woman with their physique alone? That he had to wait until he was far enough along in his career to purchase a mate?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 03:59 PM
-3

If you're raped, you'll still have the option of an abortion. These men had no option to sire children earlier in life.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 03:12 PM
-6

No, it's not.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 03:11 PM
-7

When men are fathering childen in their late 30s, 40s or even 50s, it's usually not by choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 02:51 PM
–

Well, my interpretation is that they're just following their nature and there's no deeper thought or rationale behind it - they're dogs licking their own balls, or their cunt flaps, you get my point. Can you prove me wrong? This type of "don't question anything, shut your brain off and just do the thing in front of you" herd mentality that seems to come so naturally to girls, as well as adult women, is anathema to academia. Again, it'll do wonders for your GPA, I don't deny that. But those are m…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 01:14 PM
–

I'll say it again, hopefully this time it'll stick - unfalsifiable claim. That is one interpretation, and an overly charitable one at that, though that's unsurprising coming from you. Here's another; they're just animals following their nature - the reason they sit still and why teacher likes them, is because girls are naturally meek and compliant. Whatever the case, my original point stands: those traits are not indicative of high intelligence or a natural aptitude for academia.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 09:40 AM
3

No, I want to complain and bitch out. If you don't like that, you can go back to r/TwoXChromosomes. Trust me, you won't be missed.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 10:44 AM
1

Again, unfalsifiable claim. We'll never know for certain what girls' motivation for tolerating the humdrum drudgery of school life is. For the sake of argument, let's just grant that they do it a hell of a lot better than boys do. And yes, it does wonders for their GPA, so does getting teacher to like them - but you're not gonna sit there with a straight face and tell me those are indicators of high intellect or a natural aptitude for academia.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 11:00 PM
1

I would argue girls are allowed to be future oriented in a way that boys are not, but that doesn't address the original point. Being forward thinking is synonymous with being academically inclined.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 10:30 PM
1

Can't speak for redpiller, for I am not a redpiller, but I don't try to explain those situations - I deny their existence.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 09:36 AM
1

Let's get the obvious out of the way first - your base premise is unfalsifiable. Like you yourself pointed out, academia has historically been the purview of the elites. It's only recently that it's made accessible to the everyman. You are right that the average man is not an intellectual, but then neither is the average woman. Most people are not intellectuals, they are the exception rather than the norm. If your claim is that women are somehow more naturally predisposed towards academia than m…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 05:28 AM
1

How would it be any different from the way things are now? What you're describing is already happening - the large majority of women are in relationships they're not attracted to, never were, and never will be.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 09:10 PM
4

Men's mental health is perfectly fine; their lives just suck.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 09:01 PM
1

No, they're not killing it. They're not having casual sex, because they don't want to - that's not how women work. And they're in relationships with men they're not attracted because they're those men were the best they could snag - that's what life looks like as a low-value woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 07:35 AM
-3

Yes, I am an incel - and you would be an incel too if you a were a man. That's my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/25 06:37 PM
-2

This sub is a cesspit, it only attracts the dregs of both sexes. The men are incels, and the women would be incels if they were men.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/25 06:24 PM
1

And from their perspective, they're still not selective enough - considering the vast majority of them still end up settling for men they're not attracted to. All joking aside, I don't think anyone who spends their free time at r/PurplePillDebate should be a parent.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/25 06:12 PM
4

I know you wouldn't be here if you were "killing it", that's for sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/25 06:05 PM
16

If you were "killing it", you wouldn't be on r/PurplePillDebate.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/25 06:02 PM
6

If you were "killing it", you wouldn't be on r/PurplePillDebate.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/25 06:01 PM
0

The guy was hot. That's literally it. Always remember that women are simple; the greatest trick they ever pulled was convincing men that they're complicated. Don't overthink it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/25 04:28 PM
1

I think you have to be at least a little bit hurt to end up here.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/25 03:38 AM
1

Evidently there are, and even women recognize this - else they wouldn't end up marrying men they were not attracted to in the first place. It's an acknowledgement - albeit indirect - that they're not on the same league as the men they actually desire.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/25 03:35 AM
2

Settling for partners we're not remotely attracted to and never were is women's business, not ours.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/25 03:03 PM
–

I don't even think she's that well-educated, she just has a literature degree.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/25 05:09 AM
-1

Whoever she is, bro, I hope she reads this. Though if you're at the point where you have to debase yourself like this to get her attention, it probably never began.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/25 12:16 AM
1

See? This is what I mean. You post this screed and you're fine, I say "every man is a john, and every woman is a prostitute" and I get banned for blackpill content.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/25 08:46 PM
2

I sponsored an OnlyFans once - it was for a more niche type of content. I never paid for anything besides basic access - no chats, no IMs with the creator, no nothing. I just wanted the pics and the vids. Since the creator in question retired around two years ago, I cancelled my sub and that was the totality of my interactions with OF.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/25 06:17 PM
-4

Maybe if those women were more attentive to the needs of their partners, they wouldn't need to coom. Reminds me of women on r/deadbedrooms complaining their husbands won't try to initiate anymore. Once you prod into their relationship history, it's usually obvious why. And honestly, good for these guys. If their partners don't give enough of a shit about their emotional wellbeing to make them feel wanted, there are plenty of other younger, hotter women who will.. for a price, of course.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/25 03:02 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter