TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Selfdisciplinedlife Archive

View 0 posts and 18 comments by Selfdisciplinedlife on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Well, he believed women should have equal rights with men, so by the popular definition which feminists claim to promote he must have been a feminist. A Nazi and a feminist (feminazi?). /s
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/10/20 03:33 PM
4

Well, I'm not in the US. Also, you have to factor in the fact that different crimes have different conviction rates and it's possible that not all convictions are counted the same (example, being acquitted of 8 charges but convicted of one minor charge). Murders have a high conviction rate while rapes have a much lower conviction rate (obviously people don't lie about being murdered but clearly people do lie about being raped). Regardless of 85%, 75% or 65%, the fact is convictions are much more…
/r/MensRights10/09/20 06:45 PM
6

He said she saids don’t really fair well in criminal court because of the doubt. That's a myth. Many sexual assault/rape cases are he-said/she-said with little collaborating evidence and there are plenty of convictions in those cases. If you can show that "sex" happened (and the accused often admits to that), then it just boils down to credibility of the witnesses. It is very possible to have a highly credible accuser and a much less credible accused. It happens all the time.
/r/MensRights10/09/20 06:26 PM
10

It’s very very difficult to convict someone within the criminal aspect You are mistaken. In fact, about 85% of the criminally accused are convicted at trial (with rape being a notable exception). Beyond a reasonable doubt does not mean 99% or anything like that. Reasonable doubt generally means a SERIOUS doubt based on evidence brought at trial. For example, if it's a "he said, she said" situation and the alleged victim is very convincing and the accused is much less convincing (holes in their t…
/r/MensRights10/09/20 06:18 PM
2

The main mod of that sub is a chief submitter to r/menslib and he deletes anything that is male centric. That’s what menslib is about - women first. That sub is practically dead anyway.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/09/20 06:25 PM
3

I swear this is trigglypuff.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/08/20 01:50 AM
16

Critical as in “critical theory”, like critical race theory or critical gender theory. It’s a “system” where you criticize (hence the critical) the “assumptions” (usually verifiable facts) about a subject matter in order to undermine them. Logic has nothing to do with “critical analysis”.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/08/20 01:35 AM
2

This is why NASA needs to spend 60 bagillian dollars to find a way of travelling to the planet where this woman lives. We need these women here on earth.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/08/20 02:01 PM
39

I believe that is the go-ahead to speak up. The great thing about wearing a mask now is that you can rehearse all of your pick up lines before hand, store them on your phone, then just move your mouth under the mask as you discretely play them to her. It doesn't even have to be your voice! /s
/r/seduction05/08/20 08:45 PM
8

What is your opiniom? My opinion is that you've only read two books on seduction and that's not nearly enough to understand the principles involved. Indeed, without carefully studying hundreds of treatises on the topic, indexing those treatises into a relational database, then extracting datasets from this database before doing a cross-referenced fourier analysis on these data sets, you really can't understand seduction and will be doomed to live the life of a hopeless incel forever. Or, you cou…
/r/seduction05/08/20 07:49 PM
10

My attitude about cold approaching women who might not appreciate men hitting on them is the following: Tough shit! It's a public space, and that means people can approach you without permission regardless of how you feel. Besides I NEED to talk to these women. I have important information to tell these women about alien abductions, food additives and Donald Trump and just throwing a bunch of pamphlets in their faces and then running away doesn't work. THEY NEVER READ THE PAMPHLETS. Besides, it'…
/r/seduction05/08/20 06:35 PM
178

OK, there have been several of these "cold approach" posts in the past day and it's freaking me out how wrongly people are reacting. Congratulating these guys? WTF! You can't just casually walked up to a woman and start politely talking to her and then - clutches pearls - ask her out! Jesus Christ! What part of "don't rape women" are you guys not understanding? You. Need. Consent. You need consent from a woman before you walk up to her and ask for her consent to go out with you. You have to wait…
/r/seduction05/08/20 04:59 PM
27

This is all very nice, but all of your points except for the last one are of no practical value to 80% or men. The fact is there are only two rules to being successful on dating apps: Be attractive. Don't be unattractive. If you don't follow rules 1 & 2, then your first nine points don't matter. Women don't want articulate, thoughtful and witty profiles or messages from guys they are not attracted to. They would much rather read "hi" from a guy who's hot. That sounds harsh, but it's true. Having…
/r/seduction31/07/20 05:01 PM
9

dating is not a men’s rights issue I agree that compared to those issues that are literally killing and viciously oppressing millions of men world wide (indentured labor, conscription, child soldiers, discriminatory education practices, criminal laws, etc) dating seems like a minor issue. However, anything that disproportionally impacts the life of men is a men's rights issue. Anything that prioritizes women over men including any legislation surrounding dating such as legislation relating to da…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/20 03:18 PM
1

if you are a short-tempered Inuit you get called a random-word Iceholes? Sorry, I couldn't help myself.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/07/20 01:46 PM
1

Won’t someone please think of the poor oppressed white women!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/07/20 10:33 AM
2

Committing any crime is risky if you get caught. Apart from the consequences of being caught, some crimes are intrinsically very risky/dangerous to commit while others are much less so. Hence, robbing a bank (or robbery in general) is very dangerous and the men who do those crimes must steel themselves to do it (clearly bravery is required- stupidity also helps). Raping (or physically assaulting) a vulnerable person, like a child, is much less risky (apart from the consequences of being caught).…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/07/20 02:58 PM
1

but how do you tackle the idea that "women are less inclined to crime/social ills than men"? The answer to this question is so obvious it never ceases to amaze me that this is ever an issue and that misandrists would ever use these sorts of statistics in an attempt to praise women and denigrate men. Why do women commit fewer violent crimes? Because they are much weaker and more cowardly than men. It’s just that simple. Women are much less likely to engage in violence because they know that if th…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/07/20 01:47 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter