TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Selphia2000 Archive

View 6 posts and 93 comments by Selphia2000 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
12

Good Will Hunting is a film I recommend everyone, but especially men, to watch at some point in their lives. It is an excellent deconstruction of masculinity and male psychology, while treating these topics with accurate delicacy. I also recommend watching a couple of war films that do a really good job of exploring how society mistreats and damages men. In particular, Full Metal Jacket, Jarhead, and The Hurt Locker are films I would highly recommend.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/01/24 12:16 PM
1

You need to study semantics, mate. That's not what 'phobia' means in this context. Means 'hatred of' not 'fear of' when applied to demographics of people. Play dumb? If by that you mean not believe an accusation without evidence, then yes. I would have thought that this sub of all subs would understand the importance providing evidence when making an accusation. That's not arguing in bad faith, that asking for the the bare minimum when when debating someone. Don't make false accusations, especia…
/r/MensRights28/10/22 01:24 PM
0

Ok, yeah, we can't go in and change someone's chromosomes. But denying that the only thing sex change operations do is change someone's genitals is ignorant of what these operations do for the people that have them. They enable them to physically become the sex they really are. For all intents and purposes, that is a sex change operation.
/r/MensRights28/10/22 01:09 PM
-4

She spat some facts. She also spat a lot of transphobic shit
/r/MensRights28/10/22 01:07 PM
0

So, nice transphobia there Yes, I know they're my neighbours and countrymen, but that doesn't excuse the old-fashioned, slightly misogynistic phrasing you used. Yes. Where's the evidence for an 'extreme' increase in rapes? Cite me some studies/evidence please. We didn't listen to bleeding heart liberals, we voted in 4 successive Conservative governments. Quite the opposite actually. I, unlike you, know my own country's history and politics.
/r/MensRights28/10/22 01:05 PM
-1

Research studies? Cite them. There's no such thing as hate speech? What planet are you living on? Hate speech is just the voicing of opinions that express hate towards others. Ignorance is related, yes, but not the same thing. Also, there is only one major media news outlet that has politically-right views, and a few relatively neutral ones. The rest are heavily poltically-left. Your argument here is what, exactly? That the majority of outlets attempting to inform others of news are left-wing? Y…
/r/MensRights28/10/22 12:43 PM
-19

Yes, gender is subjective. Yes, sex is objective. But we can change someone's sex. That is literally what sex change operations do.
/r/MensRights28/10/22 11:58 AM
7

They don't like the fact that people aren't perfect. We can both celebrate and condemn a person.
/r/MensRights28/10/22 11:56 AM
-3

hate, slavery, division, and crime Who perpetuates this? The political right or the political left? I would say, the right. policing, censorship Policing? Yes. We police hate speech more. Is that a bad thing? Censorship? No. Information has never been more free, and I would argue that conservatives are doing more to censor liberals than the other way around. Remember, freedom of speech doesn't equal freedom from consequences. the advent of the "leave me alone I leave you alone" crowd who aren't …
/r/MensRights28/10/22 11:54 AM
-2

Now can you not imagine that a person who was physically a man but wanted to be a woman wouldn't also have a shitty time trying to be a man? Yeah, I agree with this, apart from your choice of word 'wanted'. Trans people don't 'want' to be the opposite gender, they are the opposite gender, but just born in the wrong body. It's not that hard to understand.
/r/MensRights28/10/22 11:51 AM
4

I'm saying the LGB community got hijacked by people with mental illnesses and are using it as a shield Clear example of a false accusation without evidence (ironic, given the sub you are debating in). Obviously you're cherry picking from one example you know: your uncle's relationship with his husband. The vast, overwhelming majority of LGBT+ people are not mentally ill, and the insinuation that they are is incredibly hateful. shouldn't you be more worried about your women being raped by immigra…
/r/MensRights28/10/22 11:49 AM
-20

So, sex change operations don't exist?
/r/MensRights28/10/22 11:43 AM
5

Yeah, but she wasn't trans. She was a cis woman experiencing what it's like to be a man. She didn't think she was a man, so there's a difference there. The fact that you can't see that difference is what's cracked here
/r/MensRights28/10/22 11:42 AM
4

So now you're implying there's a link between transsexualism (and broader LGBT+ issues) and paedophilia? Yeah, that tells me a lot about you
/r/MensRights28/10/22 11:37 AM
-16

I would love to debate trans rights, but I know that arguments don't change opinions, they only entrench them. I will instead only remind you that history has consistently shown human society progressing to be more and more liberal. Conservatism has consistently been left behind. Sure, there may be short setbacks, but we have always moved forward as a society on the whole. The Men's Rights Movement is inherently liberal in nature due to its focus on progressing human rights. But transphobia is n…
/r/MensRights28/10/22 11:26 AM
-26

But that's not a fact, that's her opinion. The phrase 'She did not believe' indicates she is stating her opinion, hence the word 'believe'. Do you not speak English?
/r/MensRights28/10/22 11:16 AM
3

No, I'm a cis man. What an assumption to make
/r/MensRights28/10/22 11:11 AM
-77

While she should be remembered for her positive stance on male issues and rights, don't idolise her too much. She was pretty transphobic throughout her life: Vincent was described as a libertarian who was critical of postmodernism and multiculturalism. She did not believe that transgender people were the sex they identified as, leading her to be accused of bigotry. In an article for The Village Voice, she wrote: "[Transsexuality] signifies the death of the self, the soul, that good old-fashioned…
/r/MensRights28/10/22 10:43 AM
61

I apologise, you are correct. However, I still don't see how these nights only exist to get men laid. The article explains that it's mainly for women to socialise with each other. Having a ladies-only night would be better than offering the discount. Women only nights can be a great way to encourage participation in typically male-dominated spaces, but that doesn't justify the price discount as a form of discrimination
/r/MensRights25/10/22 12:13 PM
120

No, it's women only. Which means no men allowed. How would that help men get laid if they can't even participate? EDIT: See my later comment
/r/MensRights25/10/22 11:54 AM
529

The issue here is not the concept of a 'ladies night'. I think it's a nice idea, and the article even mentioned how popular it is, with many women seeing it as a great way to meet and catch up with their friends. The issue is the price discount. That's where it goes from a nice tradition to discrimination. Plus the fact that it's a whopping 50% discount on food is a real slap in the face.
/r/MensRights25/10/22 10:11 AM
2

Let's be honest here, it really isn't
/r/MensRights20/10/22 12:56 AM
7

Quote from the paper: In conclusion, the magnitude of the bias against male students in not negligible, and may have negative consequences. This is especially true regarding Mathematics, where a teacher penalty may translate into a failing grade, since the average teacher grade for boys falls right on the passing mark. Indeed, it has been hypothesized that boys’ struggles in the Italian system might be partially driven by grading biases (Di Liberto, Casula and Pau 2021). Says it all, really
/r/MensRights20/10/22 12:49 AM
16

A little late to the party, but I'll add to the discussion. I think it should be a three-stage process: short-term/immediate support and relief goals, medium-term legal goals, and long-term social reform goals. I compare this to FDR's New Deal, if you know your American political history (Relief, Recover, Reform) Short-term: Increased awareness of the Men's Rights Movement and its aims and struggles, and awareness that it isn't a hate movement. This is a crucial first step as many view our movem…
/r/MensRights01/04/22 11:13 PM
29

Before I go into detail, I would like to state for the record that while I do not call myself a 'Feminist', I do still consider myself an ardent Women's Rights Activist (with a particular interest in women's rights in other countries, FGM, and abortion rights). I just don't associate with the Feminist movement for a number of reasons. I used to, until about a year ago, consider myself a Feminist, but not anymore. Firstly, the main reason I do not consider myself a Feminist is because of the mono…
/r/MensRights31/10/21 05:33 PM
1

Hey, don't lump us all in together. I'm left-wing and as liberal as they come. Yet I'm an MRA and think that FDS is a shithole. Identity politics or liberalism isn't the problem, it's those who use platforms and labels designed to empower and help people in order to hurt and silence those they disagree with. The concept of Men's Rights is inherently liberal and progressive in exactly the same way as Women's Rights, or Black Rights, or LGBT+ Rights is inherently liberal and progressive. We are al…
/r/MensRights21/09/21 09:39 PM
1

What if the pregnancy resulted in medical complications that risked the life of the mother or the mother died in childbirth? Wouldn't the lack of access to abortion in either of those cases have, as you put it, 'infringed upon the property rights (right to life)' of the mother? Whose life has more potential value: the mother's or the unborn child's? How would you even determine that? Surely it's better for the mother to make their own decision as to which option (abortion or no abortion) is bett…
/r/MensRights02/09/21 10:25 PM
1

May I ask why?
/r/MensRights02/09/21 09:57 PM
2

Ah, that makes more sense. I don't want to get into a long-winded philosophical/ethical debate here, but I'll state my opinion for what it's worth. In my opinion, life begins once the foetus is capable of surviving outside the womb and is thus an independent living organism. Prior to that, it is just a collection cells which are individually 'alive', but the collective whole is not. After this point, the foetus becomes a human being with the same rights to life as you and I. This occurs at aroun…
/r/MensRights02/09/21 01:26 PM
9

What exactly are you trying to say with this? Because it sounds to me like you're defending the idea of banning abortion. Correct me if I've misunderstood
/r/MensRights02/09/21 12:42 PM
26

Mate, wtf are you talking about? There's no need to get antisemitic. Why bring race into this discussion?
/r/MensRights17/07/21 11:40 PM
88

Put it this way: the main reasons for the age of consent being 16/18 and not 12/13 have less to do with physical ability or the desire of either participant; it is more to do with the maturity required to understand the consequences of having sex and the financial/mental/emotional ability to potentially raise a child. An underage child doesn't have these things. They may be physically able to have sex and may want to have sex, but that does not mean that they should be allowed to. To give an ana…
/r/MensRights17/07/21 10:19 PM
4

I love this. As if most of the questions on that sub don't begin with the phrase 'Women of Reddit...' Because that CERTAINLY doesn't specify a major demographic... /s
/r/MensRights30/06/21 07:20 PM
4

The general rule is if someone trashtalks someone else behind their back in front of you (and not in a light-hearted way, but in a serious way), there's a good chance they're doing it to you to behind your back
/r/MensRights13/06/21 08:48 PM
4

Ah, you misunderstand. I was just clarifying for other people that the parts you highlighted were in the original post but you highlighted them for clarification. The way you worded it made it seem like you had added in the highlighted parts, rather than just highlighting them
/r/MensRights22/05/21 05:41 PM
5

To clarify, the parts in bold were in the original post, they have just been highlighted here
/r/MensRights22/05/21 05:37 PM
8

Not surprising really
/r/MensRights22/05/21 05:11 PM
11

I don't know, but I can give you the TLDR. Father is told by his step-daughter that his bio son sexually assaulted her with no evidence. Father physically beats his son, destroys all his son's mementoes of his dead mother (including his prized guitar which was the same colour as his mother's eyes I might add) then kicks him out of the house at 17 y/o. Son never gets a chance to defend himself. Step-daughter later admits that she made it up on her bio-mother's instructions. She gets counseling an…
/r/MensRights22/05/21 05:10 PM
9

Overall, this is a pretty good idea, except for two points. It doesn't mention anything about getting the police involved, which should be standard for any sexual assault accusation. Treating this 'in-house' would a bad idea as universities are not law-enforcement authorities, and thus shouldn't have the ability to solely perform this duty Forcing a university to come to a decision in three months is pretty ridiculous. Yes, it shouldn't drag on unnecessarily, but what if such an investigation is…
/r/MensRights20/05/21 02:02 PM
4

The great irony is that we're taught a lot about how America has screwed over so many people, but we barely get taught about our own past atrocities. It is slowly changing however. Last I checked, kids were being taught more colonial history, I hope it's not been whitewashed or sanitised
/r/MensRights15/05/21 02:32 PM
5

Man, that's not just fucked up, that's insane
/r/MensRights15/05/21 01:43 PM
3

I'm always down to learn history. Never heard of Sati, but then I wasn't taught any Indian history in school.
/r/MensRights15/05/21 01:17 PM
5

Believe me, I'm already disgusted by my country's past, and the present isn't doing much to remedy that. But then again, every country has a dark past it feels like. Interesting that call us 'Britishers'. Is that referring specifically to the colonial government that ruled India, or to British people in general? Might start using it myself to refer certain people
/r/MensRights15/05/21 11:12 AM
13

Damn. If anybody has a good reason to hate us, it's India.
/r/MensRights15/05/21 09:58 AM
14

Not trying to pick a fight, genuinely just curious, but why do/did you hate us Brits so much? Always interested to hear outside opinions
/r/MensRights15/05/21 09:04 AM
7

pricks I see what you did there
/r/MensRights27/04/21 04:38 PM
19

This is exactly why I am against circumcision. Even it situations where it could be beneficial, it's the last in a long line of other, less risky treatments
/r/MensRights27/04/21 04:37 PM
13

This is the appropriate response from someone who is circumcised. Let it be a choice a man makes when he is aware of the potential consequences, not something forced on newborn children when they can't consent. Why this is such a hard concept for people to grasp, I will never understand. It's simple bodily autonomy
/r/MensRights27/04/21 02:36 PM
43

I saw your original post on r/unpopularopinion Some of the responses you got were, to put it politely, fucking disgusting. As someone who would medically benefit from circumcision (reason: phimosis), I am still against circumcision as a general practice. Stay strong bro. Don't let people invalidate your pain, or judge you for your feelings
/r/MensRights27/04/21 02:34 PM
5

Also, it makes it harder for those of us who are voluntarily celibate (for personal reasons) to gain any respect for our behaviour/lifestyle, as it is often assumed that we are just 'incels' hiding behind being 'voluntarily celibate', rather than just people who don't want to have sex.
/r/MensRights11/04/21 04:37 PM
3

https://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/for-professionals/complications/ There is no nationwide, standardized, prospective system in the United States or Canada for collecting data on circumcision complications in children, not even for the most serious outcomes. Therefore, no one actually knows how many babies require re-hospitalization, intravenous antibiotics, or a blood transfusion; how many lose all or part of their penis (beyond the foreskin); how many need repeat surgery; or how many …
/r/MensRights31/03/21 09:20 PM
3

Good for you. You got lucky. But do you really want to run the risk of causing your child to have permanent damage to his genitalia all for the sake of family tradition? You're right, it won't shorten his life, but there's a risk it could make his life worse. There's no harm or risk in not doing it, but there is considerable risk of harm in doing it. Why would you want to risk harming your child? It takes 2 minutes to Google the risks involved in circumcision, with multiple, reputable studies pr…
/r/MensRights31/03/21 07:43 PM
4

Yeah, but not when it harms other people, especially children How hard is that to understand?
/r/MensRights31/03/21 07:14 PM
5

And that's worth mutilating your child for?
/r/MensRights31/03/21 06:53 PM
4

That's a really solid, compelling reason right there. Forget science, forget logic, family tradition is all that matters. Maybe do some research and figure out for yourself if it's worth potentially permanently mutilating your child and risking ruing part of their body for no other reason than family traditions
/r/MensRights31/03/21 06:37 PM
9

And even then, phimosis has other treatments. As someone who suffers from phimosis, I am still against circumcision as a widespread practice.
/r/MensRights31/03/21 06:15 PM
3

Question, why were you circumcised? Why did your parents decide to cut off a piece of you without your permission
/r/MensRights31/03/21 06:08 PM
2

Unless there is a legitimate medical reason to do so (HPV, penile cancer etc. Hygiene is a not a legitimate reason, it is perfectly possible to clean one's penis while having a foreskin), you should not circumcise your child. Circumcision can lead to various medical problems later in life such as scarring, lesions, loss of sensitivity etc. Check out r/intactivism for more info on this subject
/r/MensRights31/03/21 06:02 PM
2

It's not an easy decision to make, I'm sure your children will understand
/r/MensRights31/03/21 05:16 PM
1

I'm not a medical expert, but based off of the current research, I would say that this is one of the few possibly legitimate reasons to circumcise a child. Go with the advice of the real medical experts, but make sure to explain to your children when they're older why you decided to circumcise them. For anyone interested, there is current research being done in the possibility of using circumcision as a preventative measure against HPV and penile cancers. However, it is a debated issue with stro…
/r/MensRights31/03/21 05:08 PM
2

Is that medical problem hereditary?
/r/MensRights31/03/21 04:57 PM
12

Thank you Sincerely, thank you I hope the birth goes well
/r/MensRights31/03/21 12:45 PM
6

If you retract the foreskin, you can quite easily clean the penis. As for preventing STIs and UTIs, if you can provide me solid, scientific evidence of that, I'll believe you. As someone who suffers from phimosis, I can tell you it doesn't prevent it. It is a possible treatment for it, yes, but it is very much the last resort following other treatments. Even though I could medically benefit from circumcision, I am still anti-circumcision
/r/MensRights31/03/21 11:24 AM
12

The best time to be circumcised is never (barring exceptional circumstances)
/r/MensRights31/03/21 11:09 AM
11

Did you even read the post?
/r/MensRights31/03/21 07:03 AM
12

Your children are victims of tradition. Thank you for realising that what you did was wrong, even if you're not to blame for societal expectations
/r/MensRights31/03/21 06:29 AM
18

TL;DR Man and woman has their child circumcised 2 years after he was born for religious reasons. It leads to various medical complications and the child being in pain for a long time. Father tries to justify why he mutilated his son's penis permanently. Worth a full read though if you have the time
/r/MensRights31/03/21 06:04 AM
25

It's often a non-consensual medical process performed in infants with little to no medical reasoning It's often performed without anaesthesia, leading to the infant being in horrible pain during and after the procedure It often leads to scarring and other permanent deformation of the penis later in life It causes permanent loss of sensitivity in the glans, making sex less pleasurable for the man It does nothing to improve penile hygiene, despite what doctors may claim Do I need to go on? It does…
/r/MensRights31/03/21 05:46 AM
18

I agree, it's where I saw this post originally. One of the few genuinely good subs.
/r/MensRights31/03/21 05:34 AM
18

If it was medical routine to cut off pieces of newborn girls' bodies, the whole world would be in an uproar, but because it's happening to boys, it doesn't matter? Congratulations, you're ok with you being circumcised (or, at least you think you are, how can you really know if you are?), but wouldn't you have liked to have had the choice of whether or not to be circumcised? Not to mention that you are in a minority. It takes little more than a Google search to understand that circumcision, more …
/r/MensRights31/03/21 05:32 AM
1

wtf do you mean by that?
/r/MensRights26/03/21 06:26 PM
70

It's an imitation of a very famous poem by Martin Niemoller about being passive under totalitarianism (Nazism, to be specific). Just search his name, you'll find it
/r/MensRights24/03/21 12:49 AM
110

Good thing I'm not famous enough to be 'cancelled'. Ah, the joys of being anonymous, am I right?
/r/MensRights24/03/21 12:47 AM
234

When it gets to the point where we are forced to turn to the wisdom of those who stood who against Nazism, you know something has gone wrong with society
/r/MensRights24/03/21 12:01 AM
1

I meant referring to the whole Muslim or black population. Or do you think only men can be Muslim or black?
/r/MensRights16/03/21 08:03 AM
12

Or in other words, 'They want to have their cake, and eat it too'
/r/MensRights15/03/21 02:10 PM
4

I'm just imagining the shitstorm that would happen if someone went around comparing Muslims or black people to disease-carrying insects. It would not be pretty
/r/MensRights15/03/21 02:09 PM
2

Giving a special shout-out to all the Honey Badgers out there! You are all awesome, thank you.
/r/MensRights08/03/21 07:21 AM
1

Speaking of circumcision, check out r/Intactivism if you haven't already
/r/MensRights04/03/21 02:35 PM
0

I don't think it's people on this sub downvoting you...
/r/MensRights04/03/21 02:30 PM
1

Don't know why you got downvotes on this. Anyone who knows anything about the porn industry knows you're spitting facts mate. Also, to add to your point, STDs affect men as well. Not seeing too many condoms in porn, are we...
/r/MensRights04/03/21 02:19 PM
4

Not to mention, shaving your pubes is not a great experience. Been there. Done it. Can still feel the chafing.
/r/MensRights04/03/21 02:09 PM
5

Exactly. Complacency = Complicity as far as I'm concerned
/r/MensRights03/03/21 08:54 AM
6

MGTOW is the other way mate. You've wandered onto the wrong sub
/r/MensRights28/02/21 11:30 PM
4

On another point, EVERY gynaecology or breast lecture/tutorial we get, the teaching physician says something to the affect of "now, MALE medical students REQUIRE a chaperone, because we don't want any of these female patients accusing you of something you haven't done"... It makes my blood boil that my female colleagues can examine a female patient without ANY restrictions or concerns about false accusations, and they can approach these patients the same way they approach a patient with any othe…
/r/MensRights26/02/21 01:52 PM
0

So I did some digging on this study and the data they used. As much as I appreciate serious research being done into the field of male-oriented discrimination, the data they used was not ideal. That isn't to say unusable, but it does have some potential problems when attempting to provide a clear and uncorrupted perspective on this issues. For clarity, they used data from 3 prior studies rather than collecting their own: One study was on the discrimination faced by ex-convicts One study was on t…
/r/MensRights26/02/21 10:20 AM
5

We do exist, we're just a rare breed unfortunately
/r/MensRights02/01/21 08:54 AM
22

Sadly, I am forced to agree with you
/r/MensRights01/01/21 11:56 PM
32

I'm as liberal as it comes but even the vaguest suggestion that women are the primary victims of war is enough to turn my stomach
/r/MensRights01/01/21 11:53 PM
24

My bad, I didn't know how to do that
/r/MensRights22/11/20 06:55 PM
14

A man can dream...
/r/MensRights22/11/20 03:57 PM
2

Thank you. It just came to me, I wanted to put what I have long felt into words
/r/MensRights19/10/20 07:55 PM
3

If women are stereotypically viewed as 'objects', then men are viewed as 'tools'; used and discarded as soon as we're not needed. At least objects have value and are protected
/r/MensRights19/09/20 01:31 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter