TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SendThotsAndPrayers Archive

View 11 posts and 230 comments by SendThotsAndPrayers on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

And little doggie keeps barking to appear bigger than he is.
/r/askTRP13/06/18 09:08 PM
1

Exhibit a - thanks for proving my point. Shit. Go back to writing "How to be sucker punched like a loser".
/r/askTRP13/06/18 09:01 PM
1

Im sorry you were born with a small wiener. It's okay though. I understand why you need to overcompensate. Small dogs bark a lot because they need to make up for the lack of size. Anyway, go back to drinking that toilet - cuz all that comes out of your mouth is shit.
/r/askTRP13/06/18 08:47 PM
-1

It's not just based on age. They do stretch due to other circumstances like for example childbirth, weakening of kegel muscles (age related or lifestyle) and exposure of big penis over time.
/r/askTRP13/06/18 08:03 PM
1

Look at this fucking Gynecology expert thinking he can believe these "studies" that vagina does not stretch. But then again, it takes an actual big dick to know that vaginas do in fact stretch over time.
/r/askTRP13/06/18 08:00 PM
4

Depends on the woman, how much dick she had in her, and her lifestyle. A fitness trainer (mid to late 30s) that didn't ride CC as much as a slut in her 20s is obviously gonna have a tighter pussy than a veteran roastbeef chick. As for smell, that's a hygiene issue. Isn't it funny btw that a woman's vagina can smell like a fucking tuna fish? Jesus, mother nature most have had one heck of a sense of humor. P.S Anything above 50 is not a woman and thus should not be considered fuckable unless that …
/r/askTRP13/06/18 07:04 PM
4

Yeeeeee - how about no? Thanks for broadcasting that you have close to no idea how to handle yourself in a testosterone filled situation, as your little shitty advice is the surest way to get sucker punched (which is something you avoid, OP). To OP: You need to do anything you can do in that situation to remove the hand/arm from your body and create a distance. Here's the caveat though, you need to do it ASAP. Don't be afraid to forcefully yank your arm out of his grip etc. It's also acceptable …
/r/askTRP10/06/18 07:41 PM
3

Or just don't - and let me put emphasis on "don't" here, shoot your abortion into chicks, at all. Has all the benefits of "Zero Risk", and none of the "Don't Have Sex". Work on that condom / pull out game son.
/r/TheRedPill02/06/18 03:33 PM
6

Man I'm sorry but you're sounding like a pathetic sack of weakness that just can't get read his oneitis. What is it with you people and wasting time on useless ex's? So what if she's not like the others and you made a mistake? Own it. Learn from it and then let the past fucking go. You don't need her. You don't need her opinions, you don't need her life story, - fuck, you don't need to call her at all. She's dead to you. Any women that directly does not bring value to you (sex, networking etc) i…
/r/TheRedPill02/06/18 03:24 PM
1

Nietzsche's prediction is starting to turn into a prophecy.
/r/TheRedPill31/05/18 02:46 PM
13

It's because, on average, men posses a sense of humor. I don't think same can be said for chicks
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/18 02:18 PM
69

I understand where you are coming from, but girls being low investment? I would have considered them low investment if you could just go full "eyyy gurl, want some fuk". Picking up chicks requires a sacrifice of time that could have been spent on something better and more productive. I'd say it's a high investment, - and statistically speaking, medium reward (as it's not always a lay). Which brings me to my next point - doing any activity in order to pick chicks is stupid. Everything should be d…
/r/TheRedPill31/05/18 02:03 PM
1

Why is it so hard to link real deal instead of a summary that does not further link real research? Put that in your post so more people can see. Edit --- "Women did not prefer male body masculinity, presumably reflecting good genes, more when they were fertile, compared to their luteal days. In fact, they evaluated exactly the same bodies as more or less attractive, no matter if they rated them in their fertile or their luteal phase. Our findings can rather be interpreted as in line with a motiv…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/18 05:18 PM
4

No point in linking the first two "studies" as they are trash, nor do they show their sources, participants etc. Nobody worth their salt should take them seriously. The Last one - Journals.sagepub was luckily legitimate. Nicely written, shows sources, participant age etc. Acceptable. Here's the problem tho. "In each test session, women reported their current romantic partnership status (partnered or unpartnered), reported their hormonal contraceptive use status (using the combined oral contracep…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/18 05:06 PM
1

That's because you ain't got argument at all. It's okay, I didn't expect you to have one anyway - F33lzB4Realz snowflakes never do.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/18 10:18 PM
2

I understand where you are coming from, but isn't it kinda counter-productive unless it reaches critical point? What's the point of Q4TRP/Q4TBP/Q4Men/Q4Women in the first place then? Wouldn't it be better off to just remove that and just make standard Q4PP? If it's a couple of threads, people can just ignore them - of if they really feel the need to comment, do so in the AutoMod comment?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/18 07:59 PM
2

Well if you're tall, jacked and you have an expression that looks scary, you're already diminishing the chances you're gonna be in a fight. Not sure what to call it thought. Next thing is presence management; confident walk, penetrating gaze (hunter gaze), situational awareness, frame of body (you have to look like you're ready for anything) and so on. If I had to pick martial arts that would be best used in real life situations, it would definitely have to be Kali as it teaches you how to handl…
/r/askTRP29/05/18 06:25 PM
1

Save it man, that's one battle you'll never win on TRP. Majority of them have never seen a conflict that has started on basis of pretty much nothing. There are situations where nothing you say will save you from a fight, and those situations are what most TRPers should be preparing for. You obviously try words first, but realize that words do not always work. My best advice for people who're not willing to embrace m0ngoose's advice is to never go to low-end bars etc, because that's where that sh…
/r/askTRP29/05/18 05:12 PM
1

The unfortunate thing is that the mindset of the "Heiress from 1842" has spread to people that do not really have the means to justify that mindset. People that are not really that far from Nayisha in Mc'Donalds (nice one btw) shouldn't really have a mindset like that do they?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/18 04:03 PM
1

Link hypergamy into that equation, followed up by fewer people being born, followed up by outsourcing and so on and on. Finally, we add fiat money and how it has spread to countries outside of US, and we are beginning to see a very, very nasty equation that just does not add up when it comes to well being of the future generations.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/18 03:58 PM
4

Do you have any backup statements to those arguments other than "no it's not true because I say so"? Make a coherent statement how these issues are not linked - and why, instead of writing a wall of bullshit you could have saved all that space for in order to say "I do not agree with this". Begin with sexism in STEM, I really like to see how you can justify that one. Before you start off btw, there's no sexism in STEM. Then link those 100 years strides into economical benefit to society. Follow …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/18 03:52 PM
2

Take a child from this Era and from that Era - keep their mindsets corresponding to their origins. Place them in the same environment of 21st century, give them equal opportunities and education. Who do you think will thrive better? The child who knew the price of hard work, or the child who got everything served on a plate with minimal issues? Who's more mentally resilient to tasks - like for example, starting a family or facing the stressful problems a newborn brings into the equation?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/18 03:37 PM
-1

Aside from cherry picking problems every generation had, do you think the family unit is better of now than it was before?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/18 03:19 PM
1

Self-centrism, destruction of family unit, materialism, death of family unit utilitarianism and so on and so on. The interesting thing is that those generations where more mentally resilient than our current ones. Maybe tough upbringing of those times if what created good parent-figures. They weren't taught that they deserve everything and the world is orbiting around them.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/18 03:07 PM
2

Why would USA need larger population? After a certain point it'll just reach the levels of China and India, where people are pretty much dirt poor and are slaves to the system that is pretty much destined to collapse. What's the benefit of having a say 500 million population, compared to 320 million?
/r/TheRedPill29/05/18 02:48 PM
18

It's funny isn't it? Majority of issues the world faces today can be traced back to economics, and people controlling the economy. "Feminism is pro women! Fuck patriarchy, get more women into STEM!" Reality is, feminism is pro corporatism. If more women are in STEM, then value of an engineer will go down, just like the value of a teacher went down after women populated teaching roles etc. It's easier for corporations to fund feminism because they have the potential to lower wages in fields that …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/18 02:41 PM
2

I agree with you. A woman is not the same in her 20s, 30s, 40s and 50s. She undergoes serious changes in terms of character etc. In 20s you're madly in love with each other. You marry in 30s, get children, stress kicks in, wall approaches, men do not look at you with lust-filled eyes, and you kinda look back at those times when you had it, when you could sleep 8 hours a day etc. Then the blaming starts. She blames him for something, he blames her for something and boom the family is divided, and…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/18 02:29 PM
2

They are good for sex, but then child happens, then stress happens, then wall happens and they'll turn into these hideous monsters that'll blame you for everything. Too much adventure makes it hard for a woman to settle down - she needs that fix that dose of dopamine. LTR material needs to be less adventurous because then her mind will be better equipped at handling the turning points women experience in life.
/r/askTRP29/05/18 02:12 PM
4

Why the fuck are you pussies concerned about problems like these? Yes, she's obviously not Relationship Material when she's down for threes (boy I do hope it's MFF and not MMF), but that does not mean you should turn down the free sex. Tell her that classical "I need time or I'm not ready for relationship yet...." bullshit and keep fucking till that relationship ends. Why the fuck would you need dread or drop in this situation is beyond me.
/r/askTRP29/05/18 12:58 PM
7

Couldn't have said it better myself. If there's something to add, it's gonna have to be the wealth value. Men can off-set "wall" by amassing a fortune/status that will attract women with gold-digging tendencies. A guy in his 50s is still attractive if he's got his shit together - aka "Silver Fox". And while it's true that women can be attractive in their 50s, because men date down and women up, it's not really the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/18 12:30 PM
3

There's no question that the use of entryism has been a success - but again, only in lower echelons. Real power wasn't penetrated at all, nor do I think they posses the means to do it because on those levels morality in non-existent. Can women thrive in environments that don't give a shit about their privilege? Highly unlikely.
/r/TheRedPill28/05/18 08:21 PM
5

But have they truly been given power in the first place? It appears to me that majority of the issues serve as a distraction - deflection of attention from real issues. There's no real power - as in power to challenge the establishment, in woman's vote. Women can't really get the core, they can only destabilize the people below a certain power threshold. You think Rotschild and people like him can be fucked by things like MeToo? Top benefits from societal degradation because it deflects attentio…
/r/TheRedPill28/05/18 07:59 PM
3

Interesting, I most admit that after reading about fiat currency it suddenly started to make more sense why things are the way they are. Correct me if I'm wrong here, Overpopulation is good because, more people = more people needing paper money, which in turn slows down the inevitable collapse (billion bills). It's basically a short-term solution that leads to plethora of problems in the long-long run.
/r/TheRedPill28/05/18 07:27 PM
9

The real issue here is economy. We dug knees deep into shit when we adopted a system that required families to produce 2.5 children, as it leads to problems when you reach critical population point (320 million - do you really need more people?) and larger older population than younger one. Obviously women will be the catered gender as they are the ones doing the childbearing, so it's no wonder they are provided for when they produce little shits that can grow up to be good drones, soldiers and …
/r/TheRedPill28/05/18 05:31 PM
1

The answer is yes if he's attractive enough. Women won't tell you truth because they don't know it themselves. Also, take whatever women say here with a grain of salt, as they do not represent the majority.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/18 09:30 AM
1

Sounds to me like an aftereffect of not receiving much love when you were young. I guess your parents were shitty, or simply too busy to give you the much needed time in those - important, early few years. Look at it as a double edged sword - a curse and a gift The curse part is that you want to feel loved because that will validate you. Validation is something that should come from within. It shouldn't matter to you if people validate you or not, because they are fickle. The crowd might cheer y…
/r/askTRP27/05/18 12:53 PM
11

You have actually managed to raise a legitimate question on why there are (sub)human beings willing to go that far to please a glorified series of holes - cuz that's what these camgirls are. Why not pay a hooker that will at least blow your dick right? The answer is simple. They don't have the balls to do that. They are safe behind their little computer, and thus are in their oyster-like world where everything is fine. Paying a hooker requires contact with a stranger. It requires at least a bit …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/18 11:26 PM
17

Well slap my ass and call me Sally! You're on to us! I bet it has nothing to do with the fact that men will look at any half-decent almost naked woman. Nope. We only look at them top 10%. I'm definitely not gonna waste time looking at a good ass (ass>tits in case you wonder btw) when I know that there's HB10 out there waiting for my attention.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/18 11:03 PM
2

Girls that do this are after validation. She didn't really know it herself, but she wasn't after your opinion, she was after you entering her frame by giving a fuck. Don't validate that behavior. You validate her only when she does something for you - a good blowjob deserves a "good girl" as an example.
/r/askTRP26/05/18 10:53 PM
2

Easy target dude. She kinda sucked at BJ's tho, but you can't have it all right?
/r/askTRP26/05/18 10:42 PM
38

If you want to have peace - prepare for war. This means that you should definitely use pull out game. You should definitely wear a condom, AND - this one is the most important one yet, you should definitely NOT let her have it. Spill that guy down the toilet if you have too. You never trust a chick that casually - out of the blue, drops that "I'm on the pill" crap.
/r/askTRP26/05/18 10:38 PM
6

Tonality, Body language, Subtle Hints, Humor, Eye Contact etc. But in all honesty, the greatest gift is the ability to not give a fuck and act like you know the person from before. Here's a quick approach a couple of months ago. Approached a chick sitting with her laptop at a coffee shop. She was eating of those nasty-ass salt stick chips or whatever it's called. So I went there, sat down, grabbed 3 of those and said "You'll turn into a blob if you'll eat all that alone - let me help you". Stop …
/r/askTRP26/05/18 10:26 PM
2

And yet you have more potential than him. If you dressed well, were socially competent and had no anxiety, women would have chosen you over him.
/r/askTRP26/05/18 05:38 PM
11

You need SMV, confidence and easy to identify intention. Majority of people fail Cold-Approach because they don't make their intentions - as in "I'm attracted to you and I want to fuck you", clear. They do this weaksauce crap where they give her the benefit of doubt - "maybe he wants to just be friends??". If you're approaching a woman you need to make your intention that you're attracted to her clear. After that it's up to her if she wants to reciprocate or not. The important factor here is pre…
/r/askTRP26/05/18 05:24 PM
1

Of course
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/18 05:16 PM
1

Of course they are not really attracted to what you do, as few of them truly give a shit. They are attracted to the notion of your status. If you're a man that does things, then you have a certain status they can brag about to their "friends". I don't talk about my hobbies to women I meet outside of mentioning them. Other than a few gems, few of them really give a shit or can keep up on the level of interest one of your buddies you met through a hobby can. You don't lay down your entire life to …
/r/askTRP26/05/18 05:13 PM
1

Do these women you've mentioned represent majority? I think not.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/18 05:04 PM
2

Oh don't sell Tennis short. Some of the best sex I've had was from a chick I met through Tennis.
/r/askTRP26/05/18 05:02 PM
1

What's the point of doing all that for women? Majority of women don't understand or appreciate music, art, linguistics, martial arts, whatever you do. You're doing all that for yourself. The bonus - that chicks are attracted to men that do stuff, is just there to enjoy the ride.
/r/askTRP26/05/18 05:00 PM
2

Because we actually meet women that support the evidence. There are women out there that would gladly have 2 hot husbands at the same time. And before you start spilling "Well I'm not like that -insert whatever bullshit you might add-", you're not representing the majority here. TRP deals with probabilities based upon empirical evidence successful men have gathered and shared with each other.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/18 04:50 PM
2

Yea man, I'm sure that guy of wooping SMV range of 2 is gonna shag all the chicks because he's oozing confidence.
/r/askTRP26/05/18 04:47 PM
2

Keep telling that to yourself
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/18 04:44 PM
5

Social hobby game is not hard, it just takes a while. Consider if the investment of your time is worth it, as you sound like a guy who does not want to do shit for hobbies sake, you want to do shit in order to meet women. But if you're deadset on doing it; Tennis and Climbing chicks are a good catch. Easy to approach in a setting, tend to have higher sexual drive and have fit bodies.
/r/askTRP26/05/18 04:39 PM
2

I'm sorry that you're stupid enough to let your personal information be compromised by shitty teenagers we call women. No it's not weird, as there have been plenty of idiots before you and will be plenty of idiots after you who will fall into that trap. With all that said, there's nothing you should do. Plenty of women know about TRP and still fall for those tricks because they are creatures of feelings, and TRP teaches you how to push those buttons.
/r/askTRP26/05/18 04:30 PM
11

Because hot girls don't need to do shit uggos do. Hot girls get attention from simply existing. Uggos get attention by embracing the manly role of approaching. Unless you can reach SMV of - insert sexy celebrity -, gain a high value status in a setting, or show external value by decking yourself out in expensive clothing and accessories like Golden Watches etc, then forget the notion that hot women will approach you. That is something you'll have to do by yourself.
/r/askTRP26/05/18 04:23 PM
1

"Instinct". In that setting you didn't even need instinct, you needed balls. Instinct is when you "feel" a red flag. A pal of mine dated an - outwardly, innocent girl that turned out to be an escort. She didn't seem like one, but I still felt that something was off. It's not something you should trust completely - neither is it something that you should ignore completely.
/r/askTRP26/05/18 04:17 PM
10

Fucked a few virgins. Believe me when I say this, the juice ain't worth the squeeze. It is just boring. Majority of virgins are a combination of a starfish and a emotional glass doll. They also have these weird Disneyesque expectations of a perfect, caring boyfriend. That shit doesn't work well with DEVI.
/r/askTRP26/05/18 02:30 PM
10

Learn to spot core information, and ignore the intellectual diarrhea. Majority of books are notorious using up half a page for something that could have been done in ONE SENTENCE.
/r/askTRP26/05/18 02:23 PM
1

Yes
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/18 02:13 PM
1

Daniel Luzer's writings are definitely not bias, and are full of well-documented sources /s. Norwegian Study should also be taken with a grain of salt, as it was done in 20 schools, with no indication of age groups, or number of participating students. On top of that, no confirmed sources to check. Important to point out that Norwegian is a small country with a limited population, that historically differed from the rest of Europe due to the fact that it was a shit hole of Europe till the discov…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/18 02:08 PM
2

Oh I'm willing to bet that quite a few chicks are willing to try their chances with a richie rich.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/18 04:58 PM
2

Heh, beta bux is when woman got you by the balls, and you don't even realize it yourself. Being wealthy allows you to play your game, and just wiggle that commitment card in order to attract, have a bit fun, and move on to a new one. Super easy, no effort required. Certain type of men wank to unicorn porn - your point? We're dealing with probabilities here, and thus majorities.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/18 04:46 PM
2

Oh really? Last time I checked there was no wall for millionaires. Looks may fade, but the fortune will stay, which will attract women like bee's to honing. At it's bare-bones core, it's Looks Vs Money. The chick is looks, the buy is money. Looks fade - depending on genes and lifestyle, in their 30s-50s. Which means that the value of beauty will go down, not to mention the fact that there's a fresh crop of chicks at their prime (19-25) every new year - more competition. Money on the other hand s…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/18 03:59 PM
1

I'm inclined to believe that if the sex game is bad, she'll move if a better opportunity presents itself. There's also a potential scenario where she'll just talk about it with him, but that is only if she'll believe that he's the best she could do.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/18 03:52 PM
1

"So you're saying that lobsters say "gotcha"?". I'm putting forth that theoretical scenario as a counter-argument on "just-mental" statement. Reality is that the Alpha is gonna win just on the cutting-edge advantage before sex, which is what makes sex happen in the first place. Poor sex leads to weman being unhappy, which in turn burns that theoretical alpha, the moment she can acquire a better D. The importance of sex can't be neglected.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/18 03:43 PM
1

You still haven't answered the question.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/18 03:26 PM
6

Then what does he know of the female perspective then?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/18 03:16 PM
2

Alright question time You're attracted to alpha, but he turns out to be a total male-version of starfish in bed. Meanwhile that beta boi is giving you the business when it comes to sex. The mindblowing business, as in perfect execution that is able to make you cum several times in one session. Who would you choose? Would you still be attracted to the Alpha the same just-mental way as before?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/18 03:11 PM
4

Chad Thundercuck had the ability to acquire relevant experience through trial and error. By being successful with women, he has opened up a new frontier called "bedroom olympics", which does in fact play a role. Women tend to enjoy some other positions than just 40min of cowgirl I would think. There's also the angle game and physical touch game (pulling hair slightly, kissing erogenous zones etc).
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/18 03:05 PM
2

Time to crack open those books about mental hypnotism bois. Not denying anything here, but it's not JUST MENTAL.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/18 02:55 PM
1

Look, I did you a favor by reading that hugeass document, where IT IS NOWHERE TO BE SEEN that it is about grades between 6th and 12th. That one is about ages 7-10, which is UP TO 5th GRADE. Give me the link to the OTHER document that is about 6-12th grades. Seriously, by arguing right now instead of linking relevant links you're just showing everybody that you're pulling this out of your ass. Jesus Christ, ALL.I.AM.ASKING.IS.TO.LINK.THAT.DOCUMENT.ABOUT.6-12.GRADES.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/18 02:53 PM
0

Link the other link then, not a study about children of ages 7-10. Link the relevant link where they show a study about children from 6th grade to 12th. Jesus Christ, how stupid can you be?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/18 02:44 PM
0

We did fine doing that before the advent of Civilization, what do you think made it necessary to suddenly protect and secure women? Why couldn't they just do it without marriage then?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/18 02:41 PM
1

There's nothing about grades 6 to 12, only up to 5th.....
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/18 02:35 PM
1

Ah the nr 1 of the victim hierarchy is here to teach us how it's supposed to be done.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/18 02:31 PM
1

Of course it does. Show me a document with research of ages between 12-18 and I'll Agree with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/18 02:29 PM
-3

Marriage's goal was never really about protection, security and status for women - these things were just there to enjoy the ride. Marriage at it's core was created to prevent women's hypergamous nature. When civilizations started to appear, it became necessary to control both male and female population. You controlled male population by giving them a woman, and a way to determine whether the kid that male raised was his or not (chastity). You controlled female population by enforcing the rules …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/18 02:24 PM
3

Ages 7-10. Girls aren't really that vicious in relational aggression at that age. Shit starts to hit the fan at 13-16, and that's where you observe the bulk of relational aggression in girls anyway. It's not a bad study per say, but would have been more relevant if the ages were bumped up from 7-10 to 12-18. It isn't a groundbreaking fact that boys tend to be aggressive at the ages of 7-10.... Learn to find relevant statistics.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/18 02:09 PM
-1

The smart thing to do would have been to disband Feminism like Soviets did with Zhenotdel. "It has served it's purpose, we have reached equality - there's no need for it anymore". B00M. End to feminism right there. I think we just need to reach a consensus that feminism has done it's work, and is now an ideology that can either die, or transform into female supremacy (Which is what it already kinda does).
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/18 01:49 PM
-1

There's the real devil. Without giving them vote's none of that bullshit would have escalated. But then again, if we didn't give them rights before Soviet Propoganda started to spread, we would have been in deep shit. Imagine 50% of the population demanding communism. Overall I'll say it was a good thing because it could have potentially ended worse. Funny thing is, for a society that was so progressive in terms of equality, women are sure as hell not stepping out of their line anymore in there …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/18 01:43 PM
0

There's a reason why female principle "Yin" is associated with Earth, Dark and Cold. Women by far, the shit they do to each other is inhuman. Getting punched in the face is not the same as getting punched in the feels man.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/18 11:38 AM
1

Opening and asking out are piss easy. It's the closing that separates men from the boys. Closing is like an ancient art of intellectual kung fu, where you're trying to pry open her constant guard that is being reinforced by her hamster. When you see an opening, you fucking dive in for the kill boy.
/r/askTRP25/05/18 10:58 AM
2

"I want to seriously dick you" No but honestly, never give a legit answer unless the situation gives you absolutely no choice. And even then just stay silent, let her figure out that shit by herself. My usual go to is a humor followed by an elegant deflection of the topic.
/r/askTRP25/05/18 10:53 AM
1

Maaaan you're overthinking this. Briffault's law is basically; if women can't extract value from you, she won't be with you. Which is, if you're an unattractive guy that doesn't have much going on for him, you're not gonna see any chicks before you improve that situation. Investment, is basically investing your PRECIOUS time into a chick in order to see if anything happens - LTR shit, even plates you need to invest some time for. In theory, that time could be spent on things that can further imp…
/r/askTRP25/05/18 10:47 AM
1

Oh boo hoo hoo, so your ancestors were slaves. Who cares. That's past, we live in the present. Where opportunities are possible for blacks. You're just stuck playing your little victim card because that's all you've got. You are loser not because your ancestors were oppressed, you are loser because you are not competent enough to rise above white people. Have you tried like, being good at something? Instead of being average and complaining about "oh how the world oppresses me!!". Gosh, you have …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/18 09:29 PM
9

Have you ever woken up with a feeling of thankfulness? Like lets forget for a moment that world revolves around you, and other women like you (spoiler: it does not), lets talk society wise. You could have been born in a Muslim country, beaten the living shit for your attitude, or worse stoned to death. You could have been born in India and been reduced to nothing more than a marriage bargaining between families. You could have been born in fucking Africa where they living in mud huts, or in citi…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/18 09:16 PM
1

Society is reaching new lows as we speak
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/18 07:20 PM
1

Don't try it man - some people are beyond help.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/18 07:16 PM
4

I think Nietzsche was on to something We're definitely stepping away from Ubermensch. The drive to become stronger and better is being replaced with addictions, mindless entertainment and lust for hedonistic lifestyle. Look at us, outside of the need to be a good little drone, values have become so subjective that they have began to almost not matter at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/18 07:12 PM
7

The society is sick. My theory is that we've replaced spirituality with image-culture. God was replaced with the all mighty dollar, and tradition with wrong kind of progressive thinking. The replacement wasn't able to fill the void. In fact I think it made us worse. More shallow I guess? Besides, ideologies are our new religions. Which leads me to believe that humanity needs something to obsess over. Or perhaps we've reached the point that Ecclesiastes was talking about : "For with much wisdom c…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/18 06:56 PM
1

Stop deflecting the topic, you suck at it. We're talking about professions, civilization and women's tendency to prostitute. And here you are linking me bullshit about currency, do you even know what we're talking about dude? Women don't need money to prostitute. Yes obviously they didn't pay them if freaking chickens and cows, that does not mean that they did not prostitute. In order to create a Society that can be considered a Civilization, you need professions and several other key elements. …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/18 06:26 PM
2

Because they know that Gay Mafia got their back.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/18 06:20 PM
3

Holy shit dude how daft are you? Profession = Society. They teach that shit at school. Did you study in Somalia or what? We're not talking about hunter and gatherer communities.... I gave you an example of the earliest known civilization, where prostitution was already in practice, and you're going full retard with economy and currency. Let me ask you again, have you ever picked up a relevant book in your entire life?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/18 06:15 PM
1

Man have you ever picked up a book - outside of school and fiction, in your entire life?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/18 06:05 PM
22

Women exaggerate oppression. Reality is that they are living in one of the most progressive societies in history of humanity. I think it's because they mistake hard work and effort for oppression but I can be wrong. Hell, who am I kidding, women exaggerate everything.....
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/18 06:00 PM
1

Hard to make a claim when you don't know shit, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/18 05:58 PM
0

Fair point, but I'll those times didn't really have professions in that sense. Tribal societies were a bit different in that regard. Early civilizations on the other hand could produce a surplus of resources, and thus create the right circumstances for prostitution to be enabled. The oldest story known to humanity is the epic of Gilgamesh", an ancient poem from one of the earliest civilizations of humanity - Mesopotamia. In that story there's a prostitute with the name "Shamhat", that seduced an…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/18 05:16 PM
1

Problem lies in money and the fact that vagina is quite overpriced. Majority of these girls are not forced into that profession by pimps or others, they enter it because it's easy money for close to no work in comparison to student jobs like waitresses etc. And honestly, being the oldest profession in the planet - save for journalism, there's absolutely nothing we can do to fix that issue. There will always be sex workers because being a prostitute is easy work and easy money compared to spendin…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/18 03:27 PM
2

Oh yes definitely. You only realize it after taking a good look into the past.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/18 03:18 PM
2

I see your perspective, it's kinda like a catholic mass only that this time you're bombarded with TRP. The Bread is Awareness, the Wine is the drive to Succeed. One last question - and one I would really appreciate if you could answer, have you tried to get BlackLabelLogics or IllimitableMan in there? Would have loved to meet those two - their writing is what Redpilled me.
/r/TheRedPill24/05/18 02:57 PM
1

Really? It wasn't that bad of a book man.. Why the hell would they do that?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/18 02:48 PM
1

Cohabitation doesn't reveal much to you because you are a female. The opposite gender of yours is very straightforward and doesn't really have a tendency to have a "good guy fascade", that's a woman's thing. There are however a few guys out there who tend to practice that thing, so it's not without merit to the female either. Now I'm not saying that all women are like that. I'm not. I'm just saying that it's better to treat every gun as it was loaded. To give you a male perspective, women tend t…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/18 02:44 PM
5

It's mostly to see if the chick is playing her A-game, or is actually legit a person she presents herself to be. Don't forget that by nature, women are quite Machiavellian. Her character might be trash, but that won't matter if she manages to hide it behind "good girl fascade" till it's too late to turn back. Maintaining A-game fascade is incredibly hard over the longer period, and sooner or later that mask will crack, which is what most men are looking for. Cohabitation is the best way to scree…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/18 02:35 PM
3

I can offer a perspective of a reformed bully who was in a silly elementary school gang. Brace yourself as it will be quite a long story: All in all it boiled down to socioeconomic reasons and desire to get even with kids who bullied us in elementary school. We weren't really bullies in the early years, more like victims of judgement. You know, things like "why is your rucksack so old and dirty?", "why don't you have yogurt for lunch?" etc. Shit escalated pretty quickly too. Kids can be pretty m…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/18 01:43 PM
1

Awesome lineup. My only question is, will they present new relevant value? Don't take it wrong, these are incredible people whose books/blogs/podcasts have produced incredible value - no questions asked about that. My issue is, where's the guarantee that they won't dwell on the subjects they've already - quite masterfully I must admit, explained through their media? If I have read all their books, all majority of the blogs and seen majority of the podcasts - will I still get new value out of tha…
/r/TheRedPill24/05/18 12:25 PM
1

That is nature. Sometimes unfortunate accidents happen and you're forced to live with what you have left, but that does not mean that you need to give up and bury your head in the sands - that's just cruelty to none other but yourself. Stephen Hawking was paralyzed, but that didn't stop him from killing it in the physics field. John Nash suffered a mental illness, but that didn't stop him did it? Napoleon was a short-ass guy, still turned half the world upside down. And you might tell that they …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/18 09:14 PM
1

Woman and competent is why I removed 85% of them from the equation. There are those rare few who actually want to succeed and do actually come to train rather than socialize, but they are few. To put it in perspective, of someone who trained for 7 years, here's what I observed: Plenty of women enter beginner classes, but hardly any of them survive to graduate to a belt. Out of 100s of chicks, only 5 took it seriously enough to go all the way.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/18 08:31 PM
1

Notice how only now they're saying that there's a biological difference between the sexes. WE ARE EQUAL IN EVERYTHING - except for that thing, BUT THAT DOES NOT MEAN WE ARE NOT EQUAL AT OTHER THINGS.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/18 08:11 PM
8

Involuntary celibate is male perspective because we care about sex. It's not the same for women you see. We are after sex, they are after commitment. Ugly feminists may still get sex, but finding commitment from males they want is impossible. Women like that are involuntary celibates of commitment. You won't win the game in terms of looks, but you can sure as hell win the game through other means. Alright, maybe you're involuntary celibate because your not Brad Pitt in terms of looks, but that d…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/18 08:07 PM
1

Combination of solipsism and knowledge over the fact that some unfortunate guy will always put on his shining armor in order to save her. The thing is that guys shouldn't do it. That time has passed. Why risk your life for that? And I'm saying risk of life because a lot of these confrontations that end up in murder start because of a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/18 07:49 PM
15

There will always be male AND female (majority of feminists are ugly incels) incels in the world. Nature ain't fair dawg. Some guys are born driven others are born gifted etc, but that does not change the fact that majority are normies. How does a HB2 measure up to a HB9? Where's fairness in that? The only thing that HB2 has left is either feminism or male reality (competitive society where only the strongest ascend). BUT There's more to life than sex. We are more than just animals because we we…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/18 07:42 PM
1

You deal with that situation by not giving a shit. Sounds immoral, but that's life. Besides, there's nothing you can do to set things straight, on top of it all, she will try to get full emotional support from you now - which is annoying if you're trying to succeed in life. Think about these things first; - If situation was reversed somehow, and it was you who would be down due to something negative of that magnitude. Do you honestly believe that she would have been that support for you? Think a…
/r/askTRP23/05/18 07:26 PM
0

Look at it from this perspective, If you have erection problems, taking a viagra will fix your boner problems, but only as long as you will be using those pills. Does that seem like a healthy solution? I don't think so. Now look with same perspective on your mental issue. Taking pills, might help you, or it might make everything worse. The companies producing those meds pay tons of money so that doctors prescribe that bullshit to you. Those meds are overrated, especially due to the fact that we'…
/r/askTRP23/05/18 07:20 PM
43

This why you have sons, ladies and gents.
/r/TheRedPill23/05/18 06:59 PM
1

That other guy said I can post off-topic, so I will btw
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/18 12:40 PM
1

Well I'll be damned, off-topic it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/18 12:39 PM
1

I wouldn't have any problems with women if they were actually driven the way Thatcher and Curie were. I mean, these were legit ladies that had what it takes. Women like that wouldn't have nagged their way to victory.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/18 12:31 PM
0

Careful there, or you might offend one of the many egalitarian snowflakes infesting the internet. On topic: The genders were meant to compliment each other. We do better at creating, building and protecting while women are better at... well there's always childbirth right? We can't beat them there at least.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/18 11:49 AM
6

Excellent answer, Patriarchy approves
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/18 11:44 AM
1

Nope, you're sitting here claiming moral superiority, when you're just as shitty as everyone present here. Stop virtue signaling. My argument stands, as a whole we are better. And you my dear moral crusader have yet to contribute to discussion. Come on, you should know how it's done right? Well I might be expecting too much from a virtue crusader, so I'll give you a tip ; present an on-topic argument (3rd time repeating this btw). Come on my little crusader - I believe in you!
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/18 12:38 AM
1

You're projecting your insecurities quite nicely here. I'm trying to participate in a discussion where some people are apparently very clueless about history, genetics and behavioral patterns. And you have done even less. Stop trying that moral high ground bull crap, you are a nobody just like everyone here is. Your problem is that you're even less than that, because again you can't present an on-topic argument. These moral high ground tools gee
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/18 12:09 AM
1

Hilarious! Victim complex? Did you learn a new insult or are you projecting?? Man you suck at this....
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/18 11:33 PM
1

Found the Marxist revolutionary. Should I begin to check my privilege? The hunter gatherer society claim is not true as females lacked testosterone - a hormone designed to make us more fit for hunting job, anything aggressive really. Aggression was a primary cause of men doing the hunting, and females doing the gathering. Males are also more fit for hunting because we are larger, have more muscle - thus can generate more power/speed, and we have better lungs with allows us to last more during ca…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/18 11:22 PM
1

Ah I was beginning to wonder when the shaming would come into play. Who hurt you?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/18 11:02 PM
1

And I'm saying that's it's certain, especially given our track record.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/18 10:27 PM
-1

The overwhelming empirical evidence that men are better at creating stuff than women, was there watching for me. Spoiler alert, it didn't see any stronk independent females that could go toe to toe with a Sabre tooth tiger back then. Do you think Jesus was a female, and that evil patriarchy made him out to be a man? I mean that's sooooooo typical
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/18 10:02 PM
0

Yea you're right, my bad. It was a strong independent female. I'm sorry, how could I have forgotten? I think Jesus was a chick too right?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/18 10:00 PM
1

Every civilization did it's part - as in men of those civilizations. All I'm saying is that it's not a coincidence that societies of old limited the power of females. Look at how they've turned out this last century and tell me it was not a mistake.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/18 09:59 PM
1

Did you just make a logical comment about why women are not equal to men? How dare you misogynistic, racist, homophobic, Islamophobic, Transphobic, CIS, PRIVILEGED MALE. CHECK YOUR PRIVILEGE YOU PIG! Women are these SuperPowered heroes who can go toe to toe with God if they so desired - but if anything is gonna end up in confrontation, I'll hide behind the first white knight in my vicinity!
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/18 09:41 PM
1

Because it is not their modus operandi. It's not how they work - WE EVEN HAVE FREAKING PROOF. Look at the most egalitarian societies in the world. The divide between men and women in Scandinavia is wider than anywhere else..... "But but but but, we do better in school!" Yea you do better in school because you're less individualistic. You always followed the herd because that is the only way you could survive. Don't you think it would be easier for you to thrive in an environment CREATED to suppr…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/18 09:35 PM
-1

Women were the ones who defended males in times of danger! Back then women were 1v1ing Mammoths with nothing but their bare hands! Meanwhile those poor weak men who didn't really do shit - thanks to their genitalia, sat around in their caves twirling their delicate little thumbs. Then the weak patriarchy somehow overpowered these strong independent women and stole their thunder.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/18 09:28 PM
1

Don't take TRP seriously on Alpha and Beta description, as there's not really a consensus on that issue. Alpha is successful, dominant, desirable at his core. Women want him because he gives those primal tingles, he makes women go "fuck logic, I'll fuck him right here, right now". Beta is on the hand safe, caring and has the ability to provide, he might not be the hottest guy around, but he's better than nothing. Alpha = dopamine. Think of him as a drug that gets you addicted. Associated with ra…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/18 08:42 PM
2

Few women will bag a successful Alpha - remember Pareto principle? I'd say it's smarter for a chick to find an attractive beta bux - plenty of attractive betabux in mid 30s who's got their shit together, than hopelessly looking for a guy who will just Alpha widow her.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/18 08:05 PM
2

Welcome to mother nature where might makes right. Women were oppressed because they were 1) weak 2) didn't have courage to stand up to oppressors 3) biologically inclined to fail in early time of societies (can't work well, can't fight well, can't do anything well). 4) incapable of creating tools Before the advent of civilization, when both genders had equal opportunities to create, men did all the inventing. Who do you think constructed the first club? Who created the first fire? Men not women.…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/18 07:57 PM
1

Beautiful women tend to be intellectually challenged. Majority of the hot chicks I fucked were airheads, which is understandable. They grew with a winning ticket of a genetic lottery, and thus did not really need to strain that intellectual muscle - at all. Really, once you get somewhat valuable and you enter the hot-chick dating zone, you'll see what I mean. No dreams, no drives, questionable decisions etc. Man I can still recall the discussion I had with an ex-plate of mine. She was very hot, …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/18 07:13 PM
-5

And now we can write everything men did and post links to add into that. Thing is, I don't want to write a freaking book of everything we managed to achieve, neither do I want to post 100s of links to prove my point. If what women managed to do through time can be written on a half A4 page, then they haven't done much. Yes you were oppressed, but that is because you are inferior in strength thus - surprise surprise, mother nature was not kind. You did your part, we did ours it just happen to be …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/18 06:08 PM
0

They are lost. They are comparing sand castles to the real deal. Still, the entertainment factor is off the charts when you read these comments.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/18 05:58 PM
1

Enlighten me
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/18 04:53 PM
1

By all means, enlighten me and go deeper. I don't hold my opinion in stone, and if you manage to present a good point - which you have yet to do, then I might change my perspective.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/18 04:51 PM
1

Forgive me for not giving a damn about historical aspects of fashion - as I only truly give a shit about current Brands. It's not a comparable company at all because fashion would have existed without Chanel Logo. Remove that from the history, and someone else of those - dime a dozen, companies would have taken the spot. Now remove Apple and it's innovations like Iphone, and suddenly things look a whole lot different. Apple and IPhone was lightning in a bottle. Which means you still haven't comp…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/18 04:10 PM
0

Validation seeking is a behavior when you look for approval from others. That approval doesn't mean anything, and the only real approval you should seek is from within. Define "pretty confident". Can I throw you into a conference room where 100s of people will throw their attention onto you? Can you approach girls at a bar? Are you silent when you enter a group for a very first time? Non-verbal confrontation is stupid, but if you fight when it's necessary and do not freeze up like a tool, then y…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/18 04:01 PM
-2

If it's name and cultural value then Chanel Logo has been pretty much shut down. Everyone knows about Apple, everyone has Iphone in their pocket etc. In 70 years, people will most likely read about Apple in their history books at school, unlike Chanel Logo. Chanel Logo is a good company, but it's nowhere near the levels I was asking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/18 03:50 PM
3

Sounds like that GF is one heck of a catch.... This is why you don't date BPD - more red flags than a Chinese communist parade.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/18 03:44 PM
2

Except you haven't really reclaimed anything that is worth. Men still hold top power positions, and those kinds of men are simply too extreme to be out-competed by women. There's also no indication that women will ever out-compete men when it comes to that, yes there will be rare individuals here and there, but that's like 0,0000001% of all women, thus exceptions to rule - that never counts btw.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/18 03:42 PM
-1

19 billion vs 900 billion in terms of worth. Again, on the level of Apple.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/18 03:37 PM
-2

Not a chick, but it's easy to spot these guys - especially nowadays! Here's a list that pretty much gives a beta/soyboy/pussy-whipped guy away: - Poor eye contact. Afraid to look into people's eyes for a longer duration. - Meek voice, no assertiveness in it - Dead look in their eyes. No light in their eyes. Tired donkey that has been overworked like-look. - Doesn't present his opinion, afraid of taking spotlight/leadership. - Passive aggressive (they learn from their wives/mothers well) - More i…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/18 03:25 PM
0

Women can't thrive in harsh environments without a parasitic-like attachment to a male - in our species, women practice a parasitic behavior called "Commensalism" ( only one species benefits while the other is neither helped nor harmed ). In our days, when society is relatively safe, there's no longer any requirement for that kind of behavior, as strength is no longer the necessary barrier for success. However, this does not mean that women will just suddenly stop doing what they've been doing f…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/18 03:09 PM
1

Aha, so people in US actually fight that scam. Well color me impressed chaps. We don't have anything like that in Cucklandia.....
/r/askTRP22/05/18 02:51 PM
1

Elaborate a bit more on why congress tries to make it fair? Seems kind of interesting, - should have also specified that I'm from EU and that we have different laws.
/r/askTRP22/05/18 02:37 PM
1

Feminism is not a free market ideology in sexual terms. It is a logical conclusion to nations with sub par population growth, few relevant resources in term offspring creation, and decreased spiritual value. Good examples of that is Scandinavia, New Zealand, Australia and Canada - aka the cucked nations. The societies were weak and unable to produce enough soldiers, and thus became even less relevant in the big game of politics. Notice that the nations listed, were the first ones to give voting …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/18 12:05 PM
2

THE ONE! THE OTHER PART OF MY SOUL THAT WILL MAKE ME COMPLETE! THE GODDESS THE....../puke. Real answer is a combination of Oxytocin and Dopamine. But that's one truth that will never win.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/18 09:15 PM
1

Monetary success is still one of the greatest factors in terms of shagging hot chicks. Yea, biology made a comeback due to egalitarian society, but now that economy is closing in on the shitter status, the pendulum is starting to swing back to money>looks. Yes there's this Alpha vs Beta dynamic with Alpha fucks Beta bux, but sooner or later, if things will continue as they are - more men will be redpilled. Even though it has gone slowly; this last decade has been huge for men in terms of TRP, Me…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/18 09:11 PM
1

Social media is inherently cancerous because it's easy dopamine. You stick your ass out and take a picture, and suddenly you have 100 million followers. It's insane how much validation that is for a woman that has nothing going on for her other than a body - which is heavily modified in pictures due to Photoshop, lighting so on and so forth. The problem I see here is that a woman's natural craving for validation gets overwhelmed, thus she gets jaded (1000 cock stare, lifeless expression) and end…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/18 08:56 PM
2

It's a primal thing. Due to biological reasons, females favor group/herd/tribe mentality because it is the quickest way to not get ostracized. How does this translate into 21 century? All these women taking fake pictures of how grand their life is, signal on a biological level that they are getting ahead in terms of the society (tribe), which triggers the woman's need to stay competitive. However, women are competitive in the same way men are (we know this due the fact that high positions are pr…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/18 05:57 PM
1

Women are less extreme than men. They might do well in college on average, but that is because men vary A HECK LOT more than women. Best description can be summed up with IQ - even thought I don't subscribe to that notion 100%. Women tend to cluster around the average of 100, but they have very few women who are above that. Men on the other hand are all over the place, yet their highest IQ always outperforms women's highest IQ. Top IQ in the world is predominantly occupied by men. In terms of re…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/18 05:39 PM
3

Yea........... not buying that unless you know few women, and all of them are in a specific environment that supports your claim. Country, number of "nearly all happily married women by 23" and socioeconomic status pre and post marriage would help out in order to understand details. Otherwise it's pulled out of your ass and shouldn't be considered anything more than anecdotal.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/18 05:29 PM
1

Sorry gonna delete if it's against PPD
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/18 05:07 PM
1

Since you know so much about IQ, why is that test superior to others that are more based on Q&A? It is not the only test you can take to measure IQ btw
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/18 03:33 PM
1

I think IQ measurements are on to something, but are still very, very flawed in terms of what kind of tests and standards you measure someone on. If we were to believe that IQ is the only measurement of success, then why aren't everyone who's at 140+ millionaires occupying the highest echelons of our societies? Individuals with higher IQ tend to be on the higher end, but they are not at the true top. And yes, we can take into account that they weren't born with opportunities others - less smarte…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/18 03:15 PM
1

Indeed, no questions about that. A 130 IQ professor is bound to be living well, or above the standard at least, while a guy with 80 IQ is bound to be living below. Yet, at the same time. There are plenty of individuals that are - by all standards when it comes to IQ, "dumber" than the said professor, yet still are richer or more successful. Does this mean that the professor is lacking somewhere? There are plenty of factors to consider when you measure someone's intelligence. The classical Tesla …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/18 03:07 PM
1

From a sociological point of view? Horrible. Biological on the other hand? We kinda did that per-civilization, or in times where values were less....compassionate. So it's not like it's unheard of - plus plenty individuals (Both male and female) are more biologically inclined to follow their instincts ("I still love him/her, but I cheated during the heat of the moment"). What's the middle ground on this issue - and are both sociological and biological views flawed?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/18 02:21 PM
9

No offense, but have you been living under a rock? There have been plenty of articles like that written by women - not men. It's not like women do not know how to use internet you know.....
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/18 02:15 PM
1

America is not worse off than them. It never was, but we shouldn't forget that America is different from a socioeconomic perspective. What works in Canada and USA, does not necessarily work in Brazil, Afghanistan and Nigeria. In those countries (I might have went a bit overboard with Brazil, but you get the point) they pop out babies because they are a good retirement plan. They take care of you when you are no longer a provider, and the more you have of them, the higher the chances of that (the…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/18 02:09 PM
6

Are they though? I don't think liberalism is to blame for children being expensive.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/18 12:19 PM
1

Since when did they measure IQ by happiness? The funny thing is that there are very few financial gurus who end up classified as high tier on IQ scale. They are average, yet still are richer than people who are smarter than them (in terms of IQ). Not to say that individuals with high IQ are dirt poor, but they aren't ones sitting with all the money, thus making IQ a measurement on basis of monetary success flawed.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/18 12:08 PM
2

On what standard do you measure that success?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/18 11:58 AM
3

The interesting thing is that studies like these never point out the fact that some men do not want any children at all. Hell, for all we know they might have had a women in the past. And we go even deeper on this issue; Gen-X were spoiled to the point where a lot of them became too self-centered to have children. Obviously this does not apply to everyone - and good riddance for that, but I'm willing to bet that at least 10% of these individuals should be in "don't want kids" category. And yea, …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/18 11:50 AM
4

I do think that you should take papers like that with a grain of salt. 248 individuals is not enough of a number to provide accurate dynamic between intelligence and testosterone. Secondly - and this is perhaps most important by far, ages of 6-9 are poor ages to estimate intelligence since the frontal lobe is still not fully developed. There's still room for growth. Lastly, IQ is overrated and it measurements are flawed. Don't trust them completely.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/18 11:01 AM
3

High energy>Low energy always. Why? Pressure. You're subtly pressuring your client while you're talking to him, and it just works so much better when you exhibit High energy. And I want to - again, point out that it's subtle pressure, as in you're guiding the conversation. You want to be in control of conversation, and you want to pressure your client (subtly) so that he doesn't get that much time to thoroughly think about it. There's so much more to it than just that. You have to be charming at…
/r/TheRedPill17/05/18 06:14 PM
-1

What would you have if you could choose? 1) You're a faggot. 2) You're a faggot, and here's why.... I don't know about you, but I'd pick option 2 every time. Option 2 provides value to readers - Option 1 does not. Last time I checked, this sub was about providing value, swapping notes and learning new things. Right?
/r/TheRedPill17/05/18 05:56 PM
0

Cool, thanks, noted - there's something to take out of you comment. You've done something useful here by giving me tips on how to improve - and that I appreciate. This is how it should be done. People posting "this sucks" "you are wrong" without even stating why, is the problem. Because how can you learn something from it?
/r/TheRedPill17/05/18 05:17 PM
1

Fair point, I was after quick value and the first lines looked like typical intro - my bad, I admit. Spoiled by reading so many investing books where 50% of the content can be cut down. Still, I'll come back to my point. Why not post full summary? These points are cool and all, and I see how newbs can get SOME value out of them, but they are found in a lot of other books that are better, and focus on more important technical stuff. This book's only decent value is - Insurance chapter because it'…
/r/TheRedPill17/05/18 03:41 PM
1

Good effort, but why not read whole books before posting a summary? Also, I hope you don't take it the wrong way, but Tony Robbins is not someone you should take THAT seriously when it comes to advice. He's not THE FINANCIAL GURU of 21 century. I've skimmed through the book some time ago, and truth to be told - the value you can get out of there is; how to conquer fear, guilt,etc. He's also not bad at dissecting the psychology and game of success, but almost every book does it, otherwise it won'…
/r/TheRedPill17/05/18 03:14 PM
9

How do you describe a mindset to a person who doesn't understand the opposite sex in the first place? This is the real challenge right here, you've done your part - quite impressively I might add, but if the reader does not understand how females think, then he will see this as sexual fiction. Spergs are inflexible. Everything that is outside of their little worldview is fiction.
/r/TheRedPill17/05/18 02:45 PM
18

This guy has been posting only negative comments on TRP - not a single useful contribution to this sub. He's not unplugged, and the unfortunate thing is that there are - at least, about 10 people like him lurking here. We've been invaded by BP betas. Just report and hope that mods nuke him.
/r/TheRedPill17/05/18 02:08 PM
22

A good description of female mindset. Problem is, it takes IQ, open mindset and a total unplugging from BP world to understand the meaning behind it. Lets see how it goes.
/r/TheRedPill17/05/18 01:59 PM
3

"Don't lose." Yeaaaaaa.....buddy, that was as cheesy as one can get. YOU WILL LOSE, AND THERE'S NOTHING YOU CAN DO ABOUT IT. What you need to do is to lose SMART, and to learn from your mistakes. Another think you didn't describe, which IS VERY IMPORTANT when it comes to investing is RESEARCH. This is what separates good investors from the bad ones. The ability to do research, and fuck tons of it. You need to research the current marked, marked history, the mindset of investors, buyers, sellers,…
/r/TheRedPill17/05/18 01:52 PM
20

Reading this crash course gave me a whole new meaning of "bare bones" - as in bones thinner than sticks. At it's core, sales is basically saying that your client wants and NEEDS to hear, it's a manipulative business that requires close to perfect execution. There's more to it than simply "building rapport, collection information and validating buyers". - You must be high on energy, your tonality needs to be smitting and most importantly of all you must be different (thus someone one can remember…
/r/TheRedPill17/05/18 01:34 PM
1

Don't think so. If you wish to give a chance, remember! Sidebar, blogs, books and top 250 all time (from TRP sub, not the newest ones), is all you need.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/18 07:03 PM
5

My guess is that the hardest things to get for a non-native would be establishment and comparison to a mindless Blue Pill Drone - the sexual part, I hope you understood (Which is a big part of TRP and should not be neglected). Correct me if I'm wrong, or need to add a few things. TRP believes that establishment has failed men, that the deck is stacked against us, that men are slowly being turned into what does not represent men in the first place. There are unfair issues like "divorce rape", whe…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/18 06:35 PM
2

TRP is rejection of establishment, improvement of a sexual strategy and an all around wake up call from a mindless BP drone life. Yes for some it is mainly about women, for other's it's about mission or enlightenment. As a TRP myself, I find that woman part is important, but if that's all you're chasing then you're just a shallow weak man. Those who let the attractiveness and success with the opposite gender define their value, are low value no matter how well they present it. I won't lie, I lov…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/18 06:12 PM
1

Fantastic argument
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/18 04:32 PM
1

You're right, it is beyond my social abilities. I would never write something like that about my friends, and I know that my friends wouldn't write something like that about me - but then again all my friends are male. He has value to you in form of bringing validation. He calls you, he gives you his attention, his time . But really, he shouldn't. You can't help him, and from what I read on the way you wrote things about him , you don't really want to (unless you are lying of course, which I sti…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/18 04:05 PM
1

She pressured him into it - also edited/added a bit to my comment to prove my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/18 03:52 PM
1

Let me give you an example. I know a guy who was an upcoming engineer, he was making decent buck and his future seemed bright. Then he married, his wife was pushing hard for commitment. Soon once-in-a-lifetime opportunity arose for him to move to Canada to start earning real money (close to seven figures in American), he didn't because his wife didn't want to due to kids and her needs. What do you think happened? He missed an opportunity to move up in socioeconomic ladder due to the very commitm…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/18 03:45 PM
4

Manipulative women (bipolar) are amazing the first few lays, then they start to use those cheap strategies on you. It works really well on unprepared men - as in Blue Pill, because they were sold the lie that women are not like that. Eventually they tend to destroy their relationships simply because sooner or later the other part reaches the point where he ejects that relationship. Skilled ones can maintain it longer, but skilled ones don't go for easily manipulative betas. TL:DR amazing sex and…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/18 03:32 PM
2

Oh I wouldn't hold my breath on the vast majority not being "shitty".
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/18 03:14 PM
5

Low quality women as in uggos, or low quality women as a relationship material and thus sluts? If it's about uggos, then it's simple - nobody is attracted to ugly. If it's about sluts, then it's also simple - they are a poor relationship material.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/18 03:11 PM
1

I don't believe he would have come back to you if he was a genuine TRP. You are no longer of any real value to him since: you are taken, you have your life, you have your own kids. Either he's not a TRP, but just a larping alpha who hasn't fully understood the concept, or you're lying - which tbh is within the realm of possibility on both the former and the latter. The biggest give away is that few women give a shit about their ex, unless that ex holds something special in her heart.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/18 03:03 PM
1

It's hard to comprehend when you suck at explaining. If you truly wanted to see him succeed, you wouldn't write how miserable he had it behind his back. You wouldn't use this opportunity to bring a guy - nobody knows on this sub except for you, down. Yes I agree with you that he is a poor example of TRP, and that is because not everybody starts out perfect. People are flawed; you, me and him. And if we don't get the opportunity to figure things out, then what's the point in existing at all? Afte…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/18 02:43 PM
1

Ok that made no sense, care to elaborate?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/18 02:34 PM
1

Why not? What exactly separates mass shootings from terrorism?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/18 02:26 PM
1

The thing I enjoy about arguing is seeing the statements like "blah blah blah", which is what children use btw, and since TRP advocates that women are overgrown teenagers - which is something I'm inclined to disagree on, you are serving a very good job of proving the point of TRP, and disapproving my point. Good job. What he does is his choice. Why do you give a damn if he succeeds in relationships or not? I don't see how that would benefit you outside of the fact that you still have feelings fo…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/18 02:20 PM
1

The goals are in a sense the same - to find best possible mate you are able to. You mention that TRP is amoral and that it exploits women, but aren't women doing the same? Plenty of women exploit men and thus they are not better as a whole than men, certainly not RPW who look to snag the potential high value man for themselves - which is fair, it is what women should actually do even if it is amoral. Men and women should be selfish when it comes to love, because if you're altruistic, you will en…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/18 02:12 PM
1

TRP doesn't sugarcoat it you mean. Bigger or lesser is irrelevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/18 02:02 PM
1

Yea, you're right. Poor unfortunate individual of the ripe age of 32 years - oh what is he ever gonna do? I mean, the biological clock is ticking, the baby rabbies is around the corner, and it's oh so important to find that other half to connect it for him right? Well wrong. He's a man, and men work a bit differently than women. We peak at 28-38, and truly start to decline at the age of 45. However, we are able to snag women all the way up to 55 - even further (assuming we took care of ourselves…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/18 12:25 PM
1

Yet you found the time to comment, rather than being above that. Right....
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/18 10:46 AM
1

You act like women don't do that either - they do. TRP is amoral. Its a toolbox, what you do with it is up to individual. If you're such a saint, then give the first unattractive chump you see, a chance. You won't, and that is because you're self centered - everyone is to a certain degree.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/18 08:11 AM
1

Seems alike since you don't have enough attention span to stay on topic.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/18 08:04 AM
0

And your name-shaming is relevant? On topic; I don't think it upsets RP, if unattractive women are successful - good for them. I believe it's because Black Pill ideology has infested RP. These people base their world around looks/genetics, and when that theory fails, they don't know what to do with themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/18 07:10 AM
0

You can call them whatever you like, but point is, at least they have shown something - valued opinions that many agree on. RPW doesn't even have, thus it's more akin to another invasion of male space and a Chinese ripoff (lack real quality and value). There's no value women have added to RP tag, none at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/18 06:29 AM
0

Then there's no point in having RPW in the first place. Your goal is the same as the goal of thradthots, and thus you're not really RP at all - he'll giving it BPW would have been better. What is RP in the first place? It's rejection of BP life, improvement of sexual strategy and a sort of enlightenment for men following a very unsuccessful life as BP. None of that can be applied to RPW. Let that sink in. RPW is just a niche market place, kind of like gamer girl.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/18 06:22 AM
2

It's a niche sexual marked - the new gamer girl if you will. There has been a discussion about that segment of population on TRP, and conclusion was that since they are unable to compete with other women, they seek out this space because it offers validation. Perhaps TRPW is the same in that regard, they are looking for a niche market place, and by adopting TRP values, they hope to potentially snag the males looking to get ahead.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/18 01:02 AM
-3

The unfortunate issue with TRPW is that it's a cheap ripoff. You took the content men produced for men, flipped the script, and then called it your own. Well it doesn't work like that in real world honey. A woman doing an operation to become a man will never substitute real thing. There's also the fact that you don't have any real equivalent of Rollo, IM, BLL etc. All the info on intersexual dynamics was taken from these people without adding any kind of value on top of it - thus a cheap Chinese…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/18 12:36 AM
2

Wow, that comparison with insect behavior has a very good parallel with today's corporate world and "normie" society in general. If you think about it for a second, the amount of people that are willing to waste their life as entertainment junkies is truly staggering, and the worst part is that, if you could take it away, what would they have left that could define them as people with unique characters. Hell, take away ideologies, religions and - you can fill in the blanks -, and will the people…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/18 09:11 PM
1

Very interesting point on tribalism. There's a certain need to belong to a group in majority of us, and few people are truly above that. The funny thing is that it doesn't just end with politics and ideology, it could be many things such as; nationality, color, taste and so on. On the path of least resistance (pain, suffering and shame), do you think it's flawed in some sense? By not truly giving a damn before the issues hit us like a truck train, aren't we just setting ourselves on a fall that …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/18 08:49 PM
1

Good question. Perhaps it is a combination of political detachment - as you can potentially lose voters that are easy to sway, and fear of a backlash? It's also within the realm of possibility that we'll start seeing things like "acceptance of intellectually challenged" (dumb people should vote too!/s). But then again that is just my thoughts on potential future, stemming from "fat acceptance" and "trans acceptance", I can be wrong here. How would you implement such a test thought? Seems rather …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/18 08:37 PM
0

I do believe that certain individuals are unqualified for voting myself, but I how do you actually implement that in a society that is based on egalitarian values? There's also the issue on economics. It was easier to start your own life back then, you could buy a house and support a family one one middle income job - these days that task is simply impossible. And with the real estate marked artificially kept from expanding - as in not building more houses for a population that keeps growing, it…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/18 08:17 PM
2

Mind elaborating a bit more on that statement? Did you mean in economical sense, or sociological - as in it requires more intelligence to stomach a point of view that is outside of the classical black and white?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/18 07:56 PM
0

If we compare an average American of 40s,50s and 60s to the average Americans of our times, they just seemed to be more intelligent, grounded and less extreme. I do also not believe that American society had as many people that can be considered worthless as they have today. What do you think happened? Are ideologies to blame? Is the shift to a more self-centered world view one of the causes? Have "idiots" simply out-bred the smart ones, because statistically speaking people on the higher end of…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/18 07:54 PM
1

Many good point here, and maybe I can add some value by adding my own; I tend to draw a parallel that mirrors Western Society and the Society of Ancient Rome: - The society gained a lot of freedom and tolerance. - The political leaders were partly considered as weak and not representative. - At least people remember more glorious leaders from the past. - The politicians promoted divide and rule tactics between different ethnicities. - The population was said to be decadent and not willing to wor…
/r/TheRedPill14/05/18 02:28 PM
2

That's a very interesting way of putting things, and now that I have given it a few thoughts, I find myself fully agreeing with you. You need to be at a certain lowpoint of your life in order to swallow TRP in the first place. A BP who feels like everything is alright, simply can't accept there reality-shattering truths without reaching the necessary requirements. Very well put indeed.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/18 02:05 PM
16

I don't think it actually produces enough raw and factual material to fully better yourself. What TRP does is that it sets you on the right patch, and then it's all up to you after that. Does it give best lifting advice? - no. Does it give the best financial advice? - no. Does it give best societal rundown? - used to be so, but then IM stopped posting, so not anymore. Does it give best PUA advice? - no. Does it give best intersexual dynamic advice? - Yes and no. If we're talking sub, then I'll d…
/r/askTRP14/05/18 11:54 AM
1

Same can be said just about everything - painting, sports, martial arts etc. What's the point in learning how to paint when you know that there was a guy who sits on 10+ years of experience under his belt? You have to start somewhere, and in this case the journey does not end after you've "learned" the code, that's when the fun part begins where you want to create something, that's when the process of problem solving really kicks in. Yes it's true that it's not for everyone, but then same can be…
/r/TheRedPill11/05/18 09:15 PM
5

Lol wat? I got my first job literally through my looks, and because the interviewer was a female. Mind this, I had no experience, shitty CV, wrote a very shitty letter - but sent my pic. Boom - got the job. I even did somewhat poorly on the interview. What I had is charm and ability to build rapport with the interviewer. Game and Interview is pretty much the same thing
/r/askTRP09/05/18 10:38 AM
1

Loads of reasons really; Insecurity, inferiority complex, competition anxiety etc. A higher value women - when are only taking looks into account, is a direct challenger to a lower value women's attention from other males. Calling more attractive individuals for prostitutes (aka slut shaming) is an effective form of insult because it can be believable, and because it goes against societal consensus that women should not be sluts. What are they hoping to achieve with this? A slut is a poor relati…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/18 07:42 PM
3

You're vastly overestimating the collapse of infrastructure here, it won't fall apart like a literal house of cards, it will take time. You don't have to be afraid that you're gonna wake up in a vastly different world overnight if you're living in a western country either. The valid concerns are that people across the western world are slowly starting to wake up to the circus that are the western politics, however I won't go into this because it's gonna take a while for people to truly wake up. …
/r/TheRedPill14/04/18 08:47 PM
1

Ask TRP...>>>>>>>>>>> Also don't shit where you eat.
/r/TheRedPill13/04/18 04:22 PM
24

Nature dictates that if you are weak, you have to make up for it somehow. This is how they do it. But truth to be told, it only works if men are thirsty. Carrot on a stick is pointless if there's no hunger.
/r/TheRedPill12/04/18 05:46 PM
14

If you're looking for character, get male friends. A woman will never substitute - no matter her character, the relationship a bromance can bring. Men's solidarity is a very underrated factor.
/r/TheRedPill12/04/18 05:41 PM
24

Younger women>Older women I don't care who you are or what you do. Not all older women are out there enjoying cougar life. In fact, It's more or less a myth. Yea it's possible to meet a milf/cougar that is after a fun, quick and sexual relationship with no strings attached, but rarely - they are a minority. So who's in the majority then? Single moms, women with daddy issues, entitled overgrown children, uggos, "What are we?" chicks who look for beta providers etc. And yea, it's easier to lay the…
/r/TheRedPill12/04/18 03:39 PM
1

This is a very good point. Having power over someone is very addicting, attractive and corrupting. The thing is, it doesn't have to be much - as long as he listens to her. Seen a couple of cases just like OP described. Usually, it's because of the following things; 1. He used to be a winner/badboy/alpha. 2. She's a control freak that is unable to hold on to relationships that are balanced, or not in her favor when it comes to leadership of the household. 3. She's damaged and possibly bipolar. 4.…
/r/TheRedPill08/04/18 02:01 PM
3

Natural gymnasts tend to have physiques that are non-roided. The thing is they do workout consistently for years to achieve bodies like that. The most buff gymnast I know that is not roided is this Alex Kovas: He's been working out consistently throughout his whole life.
/r/TheRedPill04/04/18 01:50 PM
8

It's a scoobie oobie doobie, scoobie doobie melody?
/r/MGTOW04/04/18 12:35 AM
1

I like how your last statement can be used to contradict your "explanation", very well done sir. Sounds to me like you need to update your history knowledge a bit. Trade fairs and random encounters with other tribes would have been enough to prevent inbreeding. There's also the factor of inbreeding weakness that peoples of that time could not afford to have in their tribes. They could not afford to have weaklings back then.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/18 03:23 PM
1

Are sluts obvious? Some are, majority are not. Same can be applied to everything else in the world. Few people benefit from writing their ideologies, lifestyles and everything else on their foreheads. At the end of the day it always comes back to "us against them" mentality. The reason doesn't really matter. It can be color, religion, personality, taste etc. Few people are mentally capable enough to understand that none of this really matters. You have like what? 70-90 years in life? Will this s…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/18 12:33 PM
2

Easier to be a slut than it is to be a stud. Being stud takes skill, knowledge and experience - it's not for everyone. A lock that can be opened up by anyone is a shitty lock. A key that can open up any lock is a MASTERkey, simple as that.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/18 12:00 PM
3

Problem is that sluts crave great sex, and majority of men are incapable of that. There's also the fact that it's a lot easier for a woman to please man than vice versa. If a chick is able to do oral and standard positions, then she has already 90% of what she needs to please a man in bed. Men on the other hand need to have decent stamina, experience with positions and angles, variety, immersion etc. These things are a lot harder to master.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/18 11:50 AM
2

That's not exactly true. If a woman is VERY experienced in bed, then it's 80% of time safe to assume that she has had quite a few sexscapades in the past. Nobody starts out experienced. Outside of that, it's really hard to tell if a girl is a slut or not - not counting the obvious ones that do not hide it. But that is because being ostracized is a bigger deal for a woman than it is for a man (I'm not saying that men do not suffer from that either).
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/18 11:40 AM
1

Article and bullshit aside, if we go back even further - before neolithic revolution, then it was quite normal for a man (successful by that times standards) to mate with several women. Also, elaborate on incest a bit more. Sounds to me like you pulled that one out of your ass.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/18 11:29 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter