TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SentientNose Archive

View 0 posts and 244 comments by SentientNose on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

I don't even understand your point of contention. Are you staying in good faith that you don't believe within the past 15 years there has been an increase in difficulty dating for men?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 08:47 AM
-1

It terms of everything that matters in modern society, yes women mature faster than men. They are far more responsible at the age range of 18-25. At self preservation, finances, detachment from parents and moving into their first apartment. When you deep dive into frontal lobe development you see that women typically develop faster in that range, that's part of the reason why disorders like ADHD are less present in women, and when present have much less of an effect If you disagree with me, legi…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 08:21 PM
4

Notice how much women here hate against men approaching In public. Simultaneously notice how few get approached by real actual men in public and not some random crazy homeless person.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/24 01:05 AM
2

He is, in the dimiliy lit corner of your house at 3:30 in the morning, in secret, terrified you might catch him.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 07:36 AM
1

It's not high. It's just neurotic, and displays a lack of understanding of men in general, or the normal mans behavior with, either pornography or his own sexuality. If you understood male sexuality better from their perspective , you probably wouldn't care about pornography tbh.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 07:35 AM
1

Yup, but it actually is used and fits in better with bodies of primates like gorillas or chimpanzees. However in chimpanzees much like humans it's much more of a tiered hierarchy.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 05:29 PM
1

while saying alpha is extremely cringe and stupid. This isn't true when you look at primate groups, alphas are a characterization used consistently and accurately.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 05:27 PM
-1

I'm sorry to say, but this entire argument has been ppd, cope from the beginning. You guys don't understand how to read and interpret studies, and the validation of said studies. A study using cold calling as a method, is not going to paint accurate numbers towards single men and women. Point blank, cope all you want for it, but the only women that answer cold calls are stay at home moms, and the only men answering cold calls are unemployed losers. When's the last time you answered a cold call s…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 05:48 AM
0

"Begin aging" is simply a random parameter you are using. Skin was aging since the day you came out of the womb. We're talking about rate of aging, to which it's abundantly obvious which sex's skin is worse effected.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/24 08:17 AM
1

Honestly nothing compares to the sun. Direct sunlight is the absolute worst thing for skin aging, yet women love to lay directly in the sun and expose their whole body to it 😆. No 70$ cream from some beauty shop is going to protect you from that.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/24 08:16 AM
-1

This is absolutely wrong. The social standards you are talking about are born out of the inate mental constructs of defining age, without the evolutionary hardwiring to be interested in youth, there would be no socially constructed youth benchmarks.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/24 07:57 AM
-1

Blackpill incels wet dream would be if mens age sexual potential maxed at 18. It would give them more to complain about. You're avoiding the basic facts. When we talk about age 70% of what we're talking about is skin. Men's skin simply doesn't age as quickly as women's does, there's considerably more connective tissue and muscular structures in men's faces, considerably more collegen, and women have a thin layer of fat on the top of their skin that quickly loosens and diminishes with age giving …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/24 07:56 AM
1

With the least scientifically grounded explanation possible. As you already know there are an immeasurable amount of studies disproving what you're saying. At this point you've turned the debate into a feels debate, with no actual grounding in reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/24 02:36 AM
3

Asexuality is uncommon in women. But women who are far less interested in sex are incredibly common.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/24 02:34 AM
3

LOL 😂😂😂. And your reputable source to prove this is?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/24 02:32 AM
0

Glad to see you debunked yourself in your previous comment with this one. 🤣🤣🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/24 12:56 PM
1

Solely because you don't know how to continue attraction. Stop taking dating advice from people on this sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/24 12:53 PM
1

It amazes me. How little people on this sub understand intersexual dynamics, while simultaneously debating it constantly. You are completely dissociated with both the actions of your gender and your self sexually and romantically.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/24 12:52 PM
0

Ahh yes! The female sex, it's what they're known for "pursuing the opposite sex". We see it in nature all the time! /S.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/24 12:49 PM
1

For the men who are chronically online and have no social skills whatsoever yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/24 12:48 PM
2

Absolutely most normal woman have massive levels of interest variation, that can completely shift in any manner during any early phase of the relationship, wtknight and the previous posters completely fail to understand any real dynamic of female sexual and romantic psychology. For most normal men however, interest is much more confined to interested, very interested, or not interested whatsoever.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/24 12:47 PM
0

This is just plain " I don't understand the sexual differences and dynamics of the opposite sex"
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/24 12:44 PM
2

Nope not at all. I'll stand against the crowd and say the entirety of the subreddit is insanely insanely, bad at understanding social and sexual dynamics. This is one of the worst takes, fueled by incel insecurity and feminist cope that "women act just like men in every way". Women behave miles apart from men in relationships all women will be much more selective and harder to get. If she's not, the man she's "into" is simply a mile out of her league in the first place, and is shooting way to lo…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/24 12:43 PM
1

It's entirely from the skin differences in men and women, and the underlying muscular structure of male faces/ bodies supporting their skin.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/24 07:49 AM
1

Internally? Women age fantastic and can live for much longer. Externally? Oh my god, youre kidding right? Women have an entire layer of fat throughout their skin that men don't, this layer of fat will start dropping as early as 28. Women have significantly lower collagen levels then men, and have significantly weaker structures built upon that same collagen. Women have significantly lower muscle mass both facially and around the body, which aids extremely significantly in connective structures t…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/24 07:47 AM
8

This is absolutely not true for the vast majority of men. It can be your own personal experience, but recognize you are out of the standard deviation for male behavoir.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/24 06:57 AM
1

Imagine assuming rich men aren't on reddit LMFAO 🤣. Literally a site populated by the highest earning stem occupation and you assumed that rich people wouldn't be on here 😂😂😂😂.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/24 08:21 PM
1

Hunter gather example, is anthropology not evopsych. In order to disprove that example you need to find anthropological examples in the record, or modern day hunter gather examples, not lie about evopsych positions. All evopsych practitioners would agree hunter gather roots had influence on human psychology, protip: read studies not articles. All examples of athleticism and athletic interest. incredibly bad faith and disingenuous to assume the three women you've met in your life compare to the w…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 10:12 AM
0

"y'all should just agree on own thing"- Implying I'm redpill, I'm an internet debate bro with a good evopsych understanding not a trper. The original trp would disagree with what most in the closet blackpillers rant about on this sub. The average woman's body count is like 7. Idgaf about a dead bedroom, women are less interested in sex so theyre inclined to dead bedroom relationships. It's obviously to be expected.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 04:47 AM
1

What do you mean the do things at the exact same rate? No they don't. They hold off male sexuality. If you want to see unregulated male sexuality look at the orgy hall that is the gay sex scene, when you pull women out of the equation sex shoots up to the moon. Look at the lesbian scene as dry and sexless as a church on Sunday.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 04:40 AM
3

Yes but the levels in men are substantially higher, testosterone for instance is 16x-20x higher concentration in men then women and is directly correlated with nuerological changes that will increase labido overtime.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 04:35 AM
1

Ha ha 🤣😂🤣. Based on what? The redpill? Most anthropological records of prehistory showed women were continuously reproducing their entire life. The ability to reproduce later hinges on having a first child and continuing afterward. But women's drive or labido for sex more than once a month during ovulation is holy irrelevant. Men on the other hand ( assuming they aren't addicted to using their hands for masterbation everyday) completely out pace women on desire for sex on all metrics.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 04:24 AM
3

You have the burden of proof because your arguing against the entire scientific community and all of endocrinology.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 04:19 AM
0

Once again. Denial of basic science and basic biology. Come back with hard science and not feels.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 04:17 AM
3

See a male, see a female. That's a 16x on average difference in androgens right there that is noticable off the bat. If your arguing on noticing transexuality, I would say only through strong hormone use would one not be noticable to the average person. So once again, your noticing hormones.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 04:16 AM
2

It's incredibly significant if you understand the point of the post. It's to show that people are so in denial about nuerological gender differences they will deny objective reality backed up by hard science in order to push a subconscious narrative about identical minds. It's showing basic denial fo reality for ideology.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 04:14 AM
4

Yup, go ahead and prove that with hard science and not feels.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 04:12 AM
2

No it's dependent on gender. Don't believe so prove t with hard science and not feels. This completely defy fundamental biology, this is why this guy posted this message. If you can't understand the most basic principle of biology and neurobiology backed up by scientific evidence then you have completely missed the mark. Androgens are directly correlated to labido. End of story.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 04:12 AM
1

Nope prove it with hard science. Stop making assumptions based on feels and prove the difference is negligible. The problem is this completely disobeys the fundamental nature of biology.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 04:10 AM
1

Prove it with hard science, the burden of proof you have right now is immense. This would underpin everything we know about biology. Let's see it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 04:09 AM
4

Because it's showing out right denial of fundamental concepts of human nature. Sex drive is one of the most hardscience studied topics of gender differences and it's blatantly obvious which side is backed up by science. So arguments against It are indictive of bad faith arguments ment only to push ones hopeful narrative of completely mentality egalitarian sex at the cost of understanding objective reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 04:07 AM
0

Nope no they won't. Women will sometimes get horny for a man they desire. People cant fathom how low female sex drive is. Asking mtf trans how much their sex drive drops is the only evidence, or the reverse ftm how much it increases. Sex drive is massively correlated to hormones
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 04:05 AM
2

Please open a biology textbook or Wikipedia page and read about male and females. I don't know what world you could every be living in and not understand that male sex drive is higher. Right now men have an incredibly strong force limiting their sex drive,( pornography consumption causing increased masterbation frequency, lower male hormone levels caused by multiple factors) and their sex drive is still higher by magnitudes then women.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 04:04 AM
1

Amazing craftsmanship, every angle of this take is so perfectly incorrect. The hardscience evidence against you is stacked.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 04:01 AM
1

I honestly don't know what to say when people are so far removed from objective reality to believe something like this.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 03:59 AM
1

So first off you've completely missed the point of the post. The point is, bluepillers are in complete denial about sex differences between men and women. He's pointing to the most obvious, scientifically verified nuerological sex difference. Something that any woman can confirm on her own by taking androgens, you could literally take testosterone tomorrow and feel the effects of this. He's point a direct line about the straw man. Second off on the more unhinged tail end of your post, you have t…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 03:56 AM
-4

What world are you living in lmfao 😂. This has never been the case for trp, blackpillers sure. But trps chief premise is "men and women are different"
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 03:48 AM
1

Lol you pull those two studies out but haven't done the due diligence to actually research rates of sexual and domestic abuse caused by older compared to younger men 😂🤣😂
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 06:34 PM
3

LOL. Because in the baby boomer era feminism was making strides towards equality and progress in human society. In the zoomer era feminism is doing nothing but winning, interrupting legitimate science and research on gender, and restricting funding to boy centric education for parts of schooling boys lack in. They are completely worlds apart.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/24 10:07 AM
1

https://datepsychology.com/male-attractiveness-and-sexual-partner-count/
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 07:27 PM
1

Yes I did 100%, you forgot to add that I called him nuerotic, meaning his individual experiences are warped by his inability to properly and rationally percieve and react to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 07:26 PM
1

AWW! ARENT YOU ADORRABBLLLE. 🥰 Did you really think you had a point there? boops So I know your a plebian and probably can't get individual study access, so here's an article with nearly every study we have on the correlation between male physical attractiveness and partner count. https://datepsychology.com/male-attractiveness-and-sexual-partner-count/
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 07:25 PM
1

This is essentially what your saying to me "My anecdotal evidence which is backed up by statements other men have told me about their sexual activity ( which within that age group has an overwhelming high chance of being overwxaggerated) Is more important than scientifically peer reviewed data on the topic." Yeah okay 🤣. To put it simply you're uneducated on the debate, go research sexual activity of normal people in depth. The blackpill insecurity nueroticism matrix completely dies out when pla…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 11:49 AM
–

Yes, however the man should be required to pay for them not the government.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 11:14 PM
0

Aww will they really 🥰. Cur the criticism and come back with some metric of peer reviewed data showing that the average woman works anywhere remotely to that metric. Yes women date as what they pervieve as "up". Yes extremely attractive men have a much easier time with women. HOWEVER. no data has ever supported that extremely attractive men decide to go buckwild and fuck everywoman on the planet. Infact their body counts are a meer 3+ the average. Cut the blackpill nonsense and start questioning…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 11:13 PM
0

It's not even that. There isnt any legitimate data to back up what's being said or implied on the scale they assume. Attractive males have a few more lifetime partners then average yes, but nothing particularly shocking. And yes men who have advanced social knowledge, game, and the drive to continuously hunt for new women will have massively higher body counts. However that type of man is fairly rare.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 11:09 PM
–

Don't listen to her. North Korean tinder is where it's at. South Korean doesn't even compare.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/23 12:44 PM
–

In completely good faith. Absolutely not. Yes some outlier men age horribly, but if you take the average man, he's probably peaking around 32.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/23 12:43 PM
–

Still strawmaning and failing to understand the over reaching reasoning behind status attraction. Take the argument premises at full value and fight against that, don't down size the argument to beat it. -perceived status is what creates the attraction. Don't come back and say "well what if they don't perceive the status" as the argument counter lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/23 03:17 AM
2

You're strawmaning his argument. You could replace premier League player, with famous twitch streamer for all I care. His status and social draw because of said status will drastically increase his attractiveness to the majority of women, and push him far ahead of an average man.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 11:04 PM
2

The billionaire in his anecdote is more attractive to nearly all women. Andrew Tate is hated by women because his whole internet shtik is "womenz bad". I shouldn't have to explain why your correction doesn't fit.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 12:46 PM
5

People perceiving you as having more money increases perceived status. Perceived status acts on what trp calls "preselection" which would definitely make you more sexually and romantically attractive to eh opposite sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 12:44 PM
-1

"Behavoir is more subjective. " " There are ingrained cultural considerations that rewire your brain" Cite sources on this immediately or delete it. Now on to the main point. Name one thing that changes human behavior in modern society more than money/status. When you have more money /perceived status the behavoir of everyone surrounding you changes. This has large impacts on preselection factors involved in female attraction to men. So yes, money/status plays major roles in attraction.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 12:42 PM
8

1.) 1/2 of infants died in prehistory. Producing more infants quicker would of simply increased the rate of malnutrition dead infants and not increased societal effective reproductive rate. 2.) You cant "speed up" the production of a human infant in the womb lol. The human brain is the most complex structure found in nature and you think s simple evolutionary mutation would be able to accurately speed up production.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/23 08:25 AM
1

Nope it was dead before that.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/23 08:13 AM
–

Well written comment utilizing gaps to make it read better. Too bad. Your actual overreaching argument. Doesn't really hold. Much ground. People aren't expecting. Movie approaches. People are reacting. To inate biological drives. That are beyond their control. Or the influence of culture.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/23 08:10 AM
–

Once again, just like the previous poster. Apex fallacy involving extraordinarily rich, and famous man. This does nothing to support your argument. Rather it shows weakness in the argument because your supporting point is in such a low percentile of the pop.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/23 08:08 AM
–

Once again reminding us that noone who comments on ppd posts has any idea how women work. Your chief supporting argument is an apex fallacy involving a man worth a billion dollars, and a completely non provable claim.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/23 08:06 AM
2

You are disconnected from male nuerology and psychology. Men aren't taught, nor do they need to, nor do they in any situation, "feel emotions" on the wave or metric women do. Even on the most out there outlier men will not have as strong as emotional pulls as women do. Your putting your own psychological expectations for women on to men. It simply doesn't work in that fashion. Paragraph 2. Where is the sources to back this up. Where is at least the logical flow to back this up. Paragraph 3. Plea…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 06:48 AM
2

Wether or not it's fine by you has absolutely no relevance. wether or not it's fine by modern progression of society Is what's relevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/23 08:39 PM
0

It's nothing to do with women using any of the information on your opening up against you, like I've said before. It's just that the tendency for men to be emotionally vonerable towards women frequently or otherwise, creates a fission in the attraction with most nueroligically normal women. Your displaying behavoir to her that will slowly die down the attraction in the relationship. If this wasn't the case, then what I'm saying would infact be very misogynistic, however it is the case, so what I…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/23 01:42 AM
0

No, I disagree with the emotional terrorist take, women can use this and that against you in relationship arguments because you open up but that's largely irrelevant. As a man the main and core tenant should always be that your compromising the attraction and stability in the relationship, it's a much safer, and much more rewarding to open up to something else besides your romantic partner, potentially a therapist.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/23 01:12 PM
0

It's completely irrelevant to wether women like or hate the behavior. It's set in stone that male vulnerability in relationships KILLS attraction in the relationship, this is an undisputable fact. It is therefore selfish on a man's part to be intentionally vonerable in a relationship with a woman, he has a million other outlets he can open up vonerable to, why compromise your relationship because you want to be randomly vonerable.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/23 02:11 AM
3

I have to trade the book " the blank slate" by Steven pinker and the entire 150 pages of references he has in the back.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/23 08:06 PM
4

These norms are infact universal. Find me the culture where men started off as gathers and women as hunters. Find me the culture where men care about personalities and people more then they care about objects. Find me the culture where men are more social then women. Find me the culture where women care about athleticism more then men. Find me the culture where women are less neurotic then men. Find me the culture where women are more courageous then men. Find me the culture where men are more n…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/23 07:55 PM
2

Oh my God a meta analysis! My opinion has been permanently changed! Lol "resulting" in what she calls a gender similarities hypothesis. Every person I the academic community knows exactly what she did, she came to a conclusion ahead of time, and sculpted data to fit that pre-concieved notion. This meta analysis has been debunked for almost two decades now. Here's a meta analysis on why parachutes cause death with jumping out of an airplane, it was created in the same manner as your meta analysis…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/23 07:47 PM
5

🤣😂 I don't know what type of gender neutral commune you've been entrapped in your entire life to come to this conclusion, but "Talked to any". How in your right mind could you of ever not seen the differences on full display between the sexes in verbal and non verbal communication is astounding. Communication and display of communication is the largest displayable difference between men and women. Staring off with general body language between the sexes, Observe a woman's posture, flow walking, …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/23 12:47 PM
25

"Men and women aren't that different psychologically" You've started off your statement with something already disproven and verifiably false for 100 years. Women and men are very different mentally and psychologically.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/23 06:30 AM
1

Woah much inteligence
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/23 03:14 AM
1

There's a shortage of neither.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/23 11:37 AM
–

Absolutely not. Bellow average men shoot for bellow average women, what they consider themselves is irrelevant. It also has an irrelevant effect on the dating market place. Next question.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/23 11:36 AM
1

It absolutely DOES NOT WORK. The people who suggest it works observe it working with dark traid males who aren't "love bombing" they are using push - pull naturally, the love bombing is part of the push and the later lack of attention is part of the pull 100% percent of the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/23 11:34 AM
9

DID NOT READ Until CITATION POSTED
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/23 11:33 AM
4

Lol 😂. Again. Watch what women do, not what they say they'll do. The old school trp will say this over and over and over again, and we'll always be correct no matter how much you discount it. Women dont like admitting they have interest in a man's status or money on camera, it takes away from their strong independent woman ego.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/23 11:23 AM
–

The blackpill and the bluepill are the same, in the simple premise: men and women have the same sexuality and ideals towards sexuality and are entirely looks based. Redpill is distinct because it says women and men's sexuality are infact WORLDS apart and almost unrelatable.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/23 11:11 AM
9

I have a crush on you.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/23 11:06 AM
9

My answer is clear. You are aromantic, that is a condition that a decent size of the population has where you can't perceive the feeling of romance.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/23 10:58 AM
17

Congratulations 🎉. Along with your many other nuerodivergent qualities you've put on display for the rest of us ppd participants to go "huh thats kinda disturbing" You are also what we would call " armonatic" you dont pervieve romantic feeling and your projecting your lack of understanding of romantic feeling on it being a dual manifestation of two things that aren't romantic feeling. Best of luck to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/23 10:47 AM
2

This is divorced from reality, yes there is a chance somewomen can giggle at you, it's absolutely no big deal, if your smooth enough and good enough with humour you can make light of the situation and poor approach and laugh with them. As for people kicking you out for talking to women at a bar casually, or women even wanting to do that normally, it's essentially bullshit. Women aren't looking to wreck some poor bastards night for fun. They might be annoyed or might not be interested but after 1…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/23 07:49 PM
3

Yes this applies if your a woman, but have little to very little relevance to men. However your keenly overlooking the, "thinks your attractive enough for sex","thinks your attractive enough to date for a couple months" "thinks your attractive enough to be an ltr girlfriend" and "thinks your attractive enough to marry" dicotamy.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/23 05:26 AM
2

Lol are you forgetting that some of us inject testosterone? Testosterone definitely impact is your preference in the opposite sex. Not in the way o.p. describes but there is definitely a change. All other hormones also impact preferences aswell, they've done studies for instance. on birth control and seen changes
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/23 04:08 AM
0

You need to read the book by Steven pinker " the blank slate" and then review the 1000+ references he has to this argument before commenting again on this.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/23 04:05 AM
0

No pigmies did not naturally select for shorter men. Most of not all situations where you see shorter people come out of limited resource. Shorter people survive much better then tall people in famine and low nutrition/ calorie heavy diets.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/23 04:04 AM
1

We absolutely do.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/23 04:03 AM
1

LOL 😂! imagine thinking a size difference that's present through all mammals is cultural in humans lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/23 04:02 AM
1

LOL WHAT? dude this is just dogmatic.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/23 04:01 AM
1

Post a comment about people talking out of their ass, Proceeds to completely talk out of their ass. 🤣😂 MOST, preferences related to physical attraction are infact biology. This should be blatantly obvious. You've pushed the argument to " human beings can't detatch themselves from social and cultural influences, and there is no such thing as natural culture. Which is completely false, I don't know where in the hell you would of thought to believe that. Realistically what should be said is" human …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/23 03:55 AM
8

It's an old redpill concept
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 01:57 AM
4

I don't see that remotely with experienced women. The have other problems, but hating men isn't one of them. The femcel or feminist types are far more likely to have male hatred.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 12:11 AM
3

😂🤣😂🤣😂. Lol "our generation" What did you think those "emotions," are? It's fucking instinct sexuality is instinctual, this is inate behavior that's existed since prehistory. I would say it's always beneficial to override them and think logically but your out of your mind if you think this just popped up in a generation.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/23 08:25 PM
1

You do realize the women of a generation ago were more successful career wise then modern women correct?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/23 08:32 AM
5

They've done it multiple times. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2090775?origin=crossref&seq=1 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/10707596_Truth_and_Consequences_Using_the_Bogus_Pipeline_to_Examine_Sex_Differences_in_Self-Reported_Sexuality
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/23 06:28 PM
2

I mean replace power with the redpill idea of frame.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/23 02:00 PM
2

Dude they literally had a body count survey where they started off the survey asking everyone their body count, then after they got everyone's number, passed every single person through a lie detector test and got the new result. The difference wasn't that drastic, it was like + or - 1 for each sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/23 01:57 PM
2

There's been a continuous decline in the amount of men who approach women, that started before the pua era and continues onward to the modern era where you have 45% of men never having approached a woman in public. The pua era only slowed the decline in approach.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/23 03:55 AM
2

"This notion that approaching women is impossible is possibly the biggest misconception in the RP community" Lol if I've said it once I've said it a million times. You guys are arguing with blackpillers not redpillers on here. Redpillers will tell you to cold approach all day everyday. Redpill was born out of pua.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/23 04:12 AM
0

Lol implying most women are even using OLD at any given moment. The reason women have so many men hitting them up on OLD when they are on it is because NO WOMEN USE THAT SHIT REGULARLY.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/23 04:11 AM
2

Yeah pretty much this, the thing about complex social issues like this is the long answer is the correct one not the short easy answer that gets blabbered on here that makes it to the top.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/23 04:08 AM
1

Weaak
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/23 04:07 AM
2

Implying that it doesn't work like a skill you get better at, seems to be the biggest lie the deniers have. You continuously approach, and learn about approaching until you get good at it. It also improves drastically all of your warm approaches and conversations you have with women outside that sphere. It's something you actually have to reflect honestly with yourself about and form a plan on how to execute it, you can't just walk up to women willy nilly and expect results. You have to reflect …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/23 04:01 AM
1

You simply don't understand stoicism lmfao. You described "being stoic" as the phrase about a trope about stoicism. That isn't stoicism, stoicism is technically marked as a philosophy, but it has influenced the world of psychology as well, since the roots of CBT are stoicism.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/23 12:21 AM
2

Oh shit, let me go tell all of the girls I've had sex with from cold approach that it didn't count because some redditor who doesn't understand cold approach said it doesn't work. Try on this: cold approach is a complicated art that you have to understand the where, when and how of, when done correctly it absolutely can and DOES, work. It's just you have to have the social skills and understand the market of women who would be interested in you.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/23 12:19 AM
-1

"just know that most men are not, never were and never will be willing to violate social rules. Men haven't changed, society has." Never have dumber words been said by anyone on this subreddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/23 03:17 AM
–

Sir, go to New York city and comeback with us on that one. It really is that easy there. Nyc is mostly women
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/23 03:14 AM
4

One thing that does reign true though, is looking at older pictures of women, you realize just how plain and mediocre women genuinely look without hair and makeup advancements.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/23 11:59 AM
1

No it's pretty decent considering. Realistically if you look at pictures of women, pre advancements in hair and makeup you can tell which gender is the ugly one pretty quick.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/23 11:56 AM
-2

You fucking moron. I obviously disagree with the blackpill lmfao 🤣. What the fuck is scarry about lookscentrism? Absolutely nothing. Whatsoever? You know what's scary? Realizing that YOU are the reason your failing in the dating market place and only YOU can change your own sucess through hard decisive action.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/23 11:09 AM
5

How does one hit on a woman at a gym AND end up a star of a tic Tok video? Do you understand the odds of that happening, You literally have to find a way to preselect for the most possibly nuerotic women available, confirm that she uses tic Tok on a whim, will immediately videotape anything and everything, AND have capability of making a viral video.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/23 07:06 PM
3

"Also what lookcentric discussion stuff have you been looking at, I haven’t seen anything like that" The entirety of the blackpill coming from every single source and content creator. Don't play stupid with me lmao 🤣. Now let's move the goalpost back to it's original spot and Duke this out correctly. Blackpill: lookscentrism based on genetic predisposition. If you don't agree with me go read the content produced by the community before recommending. Redpill : multifaceted approach to improving d…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/23 07:04 PM
1

Confusing blackpill and redpill ideology. Modern women aren't sluts, statistics show otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/23 05:42 PM
3

Doesn't matter remotely. Why? Because those who are focusing on lookscentric discussion are advising people DO NOT do what you did. They are saying, stay out of gyms for any purpose besides leaning, they are saying style hardly matters unless for nichemaxxing(God damn it there so autistic) and are saying facial ratios are the only thing that matters on the dating market place. Their idea is about as concrete and logical as an alqueda board room meeting. MEANWHILE, people who aren't focused on lo…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/23 05:40 PM
3

Let's quit pretending the ppd mods are doing anything to monitor or stop blackpill content this is practically a blackpill discussion board ATM.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/23 05:36 PM
6

Simple. Everything to blame causing the slowdown in the dating scene is societal introversion. The same thing happened to Asia 20 years before us. It's absurdly obvious to those older then you what the problem is and the actions you need to take to correct said problem, but because of societal introversion you are more subconsciously centered on yourself and far less likely to take outside advice. Forget about dating entirely for 6 months. Focus on developing social groups, and finding activitie…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/23 05:32 PM
9

Lol does your back hurt from using mental gymnastics in your argument and bending your back over at every women's whim?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/23 04:34 AM
8

Lol quit it with the mental gymnastics. You and o.p.s false equivalencies are believed by none of relevance.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/23 04:33 AM
–

Height is a blackpill obsession not a redpill obsession.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/23 10:43 PM
3

No we're not lmao 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/23 10:55 AM
2

No IT DOES, have to be an actually diagnosed or legitimately life changing addiction. All men come out of the womb predestined to be habitually masterbating, it's simply in our genetics, chimpanzees jackoff we jackoff, pornography just adds to that behavior, it might increase frequency but in most males it's not causing addiction. Realistically frequency in masterbation should prevent and not cause e.d. Now for your study, that concern is most likely multifaceted with the decrease in testosteron…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/23 09:51 PM
–

"The manosphere" No blackpillers believe that, most people in what you would equate from the manosphere completely shun them. This entire subreddit is filled with blackpillers not manopsherian people.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/23 06:20 PM
4

Please read and understand your sources BEFORE, posting them to another person on an argument. I just wasted my time reading 4 separate sources, none of which prove or make any real argument to the discussion of: Men's standards changing. Example your first source: "The whr fo Victoria secret models has gone up" Excuse me what the fuck does that have to do with men? Do you think these models are geared to men? Are men purchasing women's underwear for themselves or something?? Also I DO NOT agree…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/23 06:19 PM
0

No one is getting shamed on social media. Less than 0.001% of men. The fact you believe that any percentage of men irl get shamed on social media means you haven't touched grass. Stop being a pussy, go outside join social groups frequent bars and talk to both men and women with no intention of sex and relationships for 6 months. Then switch to actually pursuing women.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/23 06:06 PM
9

No there is no evidence of this. Infact I wholeheartedly believe in the contrary. Porn lowers/widens men's standards, it opens men up to more of a range of body types, while simultaneously making them bored of maximized perfect body types. Men's natural sexuality is towards novelty anyhow.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/23 05:37 PM
–

Did this person just use an Instagram link as a source?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 10:34 PM
-1

Sespefically to avoid food service jobs. Let's be clear your still never going to see women out in 12 hour shift occupations like that without a degree.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 10:31 PM
1

That accounts for about 0.3% of the work force and 1.5% if you included medical lower levels with the nurses you described earlier. Hardly anything when you compare it to the vast array of bluecollar workforce jobs.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 10:30 PM
2

Entirely ignoring both inheritance, and widows are we?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 10:22 PM
6

The lack of response you have to the which comment shows your wrong. Also learn to read the methodology of a study and understand what that means about a study before believing studies on socially impacted things. For instance any study done on body count done through cold calling can essentially be thrown in the trash because the only people answering those cold calls are, virgin men living in their parents basement and STAHMs
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 02:39 AM
10

No the data does not show that remotely. The methodology is complete trash, and shows zero account for the most obvious factor in the study. Plenty of men are retarded AF, and will literally write a body count 10 points above what it is on a study to feel better about themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 02:37 AM
8

Yeah, sadly, no. Zoomers have severe social stunting, the vast majority aren't fucking casually.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 02:35 AM
23

His personal insecurities.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 02:33 AM
1

Not what men mean lol. Realistically women don't need to be attracted to intelligence, effectively intelligent men know how to utilize their intelligence to find themselves in situations where they can get women.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 12:48 AM
7

Yeah it's absolutely ridiculous the mods haven't canned this thread for being so blatantly out of touch with reality, and warping data.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 12:42 AM
6

We get it, you got rejected by a couple of women on tinder because you couldnt bare up the courage to talk to women in real life. Now let's quit the bullshit and socially intergrate and touch base with reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 12:40 AM
1

No they didn't lmao. Weapons pre-date homosapiens by hundreds of thousands of years.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/23 04:24 AM
0

Why would women's inate attraction of changed from the prehistoric era, if nothing has effected the evolutionary cycles of reproduction. Attraction is inately within you, in order for a genetic change to occur within a populous there has to be reason for it. I.e. a group of people ends up with a significantly higher survival rate. Also tall isn't a fist fighting advantage, our ancestors didn't fight with fists. We fought with weapons. Also Also v2 o.p.s takes are completely wrong and butcher and…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/23 10:03 AM
15

I'm sorry but, PPD has gotten so dumb it's incredible. How could you write this out and think this is the answer.You think women have an attraction to taller men because of "sex positions" lmfao.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/23 09:58 AM
1

Looks is the least determinate factor. Cmv. Most people are in the normal range of looks. Being more attractive will get you more swipes on dating apps, but accounts very little for real life success. None of you have sex regularly or have approached attractive women in the wild so your words are all hot air. People who are more attractive are of a sespefic genetic phenotype of person, they have much much, higher probability of genetic selectivity and are much less likely to be free and open to …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/23 11:57 PM
3

This is an amazing way to debate a concept with throwing absolutely zero contextual evidence against it. You have completely failed in every regard to provide any denouncement of the redpill, while also displaying the bluepill has tendancies of providing coped up arguments, i.e. ( being vague as fuck because when brought down to sespefics their argument falls apart) versus the redpill providing concrete arguments (being sespefic because their argument can be picked apart and still stay strong) a…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/23 11:26 AM
1

It's difficult for him, he's dating overweight women.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/23 12:59 AM
0

Lol that's your argument ? 😆. Seems like your very shallow into the fitness industry, hanging around grifters.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/23 12:59 AM
0

This man has no success with women don't take his advice lol 😆
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/23 12:55 AM
1

If you don't understand why being a psychopath, would increase short term relationship sucess with women, you truely don't understand the dynamics, or simply don't understand psychopathy.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/23 12:54 AM
0

No all of this is essentially a group hallucination on this subreddit. Yes, men get "rejected" on OLD. Yes both sexes, are engaging in less sex and relationships. No, your delusional Chad fantasy reality isn't real, no, real life men don't really care to any degree about, " body dismorphia" or have insecurity regarding it.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/23 12:51 AM
0

This not only is goal post moving, but arguably false for 90% of what is considered the manosphere other than people like tate. The manosphere pushes products and services no more then something like the fitness industry. Both have their share of grifters, and genuine product creators trying to make honest money and produce something to help themselves thier clientel
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/23 12:58 PM
1

You clearly have zero direction or understanding of what a progressive even is. I suggest you start reading the origins of the progressive party, with Theodore Roosevelt if your going to make bullshit statements about political stances you clearly have heard about through right wing media. Now if you had said liberalism, depending on what period of history you were on that might of been true.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/23 12:49 PM
7

What an absolutely mindless response to that comment. Social hierarchies have been observed 100s of years before Peterson.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/23 10:01 PM
1

What does that have to do with hypergamy existing? That's like dating dating is profoundly more complicated then physical attraction. So people can't be attracted to the way someone looks. Hypergamy is a large component of sexuality for women not the whole of it or even the majority of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/23 08:00 PM
1

I think its blatantly obvious women approach less then they ever have, both sexes are socially stunted in the modern era people don't Approach nearly as frequently.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/23 12:37 PM
1

...And it's definitely not the good handful either.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/23 12:35 PM
1

Same reason I want to breathe,eat,sleep biological hardwiring. That's the root cause, everything else is just explanation afterward, there are many reasons to enjoy partnership in life but they aren't the root cause of why.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/23 12:25 PM
1

Really? Your telling us you have had the experience of men chasing after more resource heavy women as the norm and women accepting their level and bellow. Lol common.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/23 12:23 PM
1

"Evolutionary habits don't really work the way you might think:" This entire section is as far as I could read. You are going to give me a brain aneurysm my guy. Please actually understand evolution and evolutionary theory before telling us "how evolution works". Evolution isn't an RPG, humans didn't just appear and then say hey we pick inteligence, humans only evolutionary advantage isn't inteligence either, humans can run further and longer than any other land animal that is why we have the co…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/23 12:16 PM
1

Older men isn't even remotely a red flag to women, it's simply a reminder to all the women on the philosphere that they infact will loose tremendous value very rapidly with age and men will not, so they throw a hissy fit as you've seen.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/23 12:06 PM
0

There is absolutely no evidence of this. It CAN work on men to initiate interest, but it has nowhere near the success rate of being open on Intenet form the womens perspective. Women who are open about their attraction to men will have a far higher sucess rate.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/23 11:09 PM
4

Lol you have to love these irrelevant psychological terms being tossed in. "Insecure attachment style" Absolutely not what is going on remotely. Push pull functions on female psychology due to evolutionary reasons, if push pull is not functioning on you sexually or romantically, your romantic or sexual drive is masculine.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/23 06:07 PM
5

What's what women do not what they say. Women are more socially inept then they have been in 400 years ( men as well, but that's besides the point). The majority of everyday women are completely clueless how to navigate or understand romantic, and sexual conversation with new partners. They might consciously know, "hey push pull is a red flag because I saw it on tic tok", or some irrelevant nonsense, but all of that is completely over rid by instinct. Most normal women hardly get opportunities w…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/23 06:06 PM
4

The second you have consciousness you have emotions.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/23 11:13 PM
11

Everyone who upvoted this comment please PLEASE. Do yourself a favor and actually research, neurological development, and psychology. It's moronic takes like this on why we have so many of you utterly uneducated in arguments on this sub. O.P. has no idea what the hell he is talking about in this paragraph and the ideas he is using are so antiquated they predate the moon landing.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/23 11:11 PM
–

Loled
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/23 09:53 AM
5

This is because of proximity and nothing else. Which is honestly a great lesson for everyone here. Surround yourself with the type of people you would like to date
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/23 09:27 PM
1

😂🤣 Dude we have a discord. Most male incels are literally 5/10. They common there all the time, I've never met a group of people so inclined to be average looking in my life, and so fixated on themselves being ugly. It's entirely an inteligence issue and not a looks issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/23 09:53 AM
1

This is not remotely true in the u.s. it could be true in Europe and the u.k.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/23 12:05 PM
–

"Intelligence is the latest 'value indicator' of social worth to go out the window courtesy of AI." 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 oh my God. Im dead
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/23 11:59 AM
13

Literally the dumbest use of the 80, 20 rule ever conceived. Unless your trolling, then I played myself
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/23 11:11 AM
–

Lol @ actually believing the first comment. It's like you people have never actually gone to bars and seen how normal people meet up for casual sex. Also Jeremy Meeks is with a woman who is objectively a 4/10
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/23 07:38 AM
–

Yeah sure, if she had male sexuality. But she's a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/23 07:35 AM
–

Are you going to come back to reality at any point we'll wait. Maybe this might start you on your way, Jeremy Meeks's partner is ugly AF.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/23 07:22 AM
3

They don't. Simple as that lol. You didn't actually believe the bullshit being peddled on this forum from nuerotic blackpillers did you?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/23 08:08 AM
–

Or maybe... just maybe... you might be incredibly nuerotic and might possibly have underlying mental illness that's being exaggerated by staying on certain online forums and groups. Statistics on female and male sexuality are freely available. Anecdotal evidence on self improvement working incredibly well in dating is freely available. Any evidence whatsoever that the average woman is in a harem is completely absent from any reputable source.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/23 08:06 AM
1

It appears you don't even know what trp is. Which honestly is fascinating.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/23 07:44 AM
1

No simply no. Go legitimately research the origins of trp, and then come back.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/23 07:38 AM
9

You are 18 lmao 🤣🤣. Hop off the high horse until you get some remote experience about reality. As a matter of fact, leave toxic dating communities like this entirely, your are ensuring you walk into any future relationships you have with a chip on your shoulder.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/23 03:08 AM
1

No.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/23 12:41 AM
1

Calm down Alan watts
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/23 12:40 AM
1

Wait? Are we suggesting there was a period of time when women were satisfied about anything?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/23 12:02 PM
7

Never in my life have I seen a club to that ratio. Women go outside more than men do. You need to strategically figure out where women in your area like to spend their time, find social gatherings you can join and learn to socialize with other people slowly over time. OLD, is essentially worthless if your looking for quality. Even for goodlooking men, the type of women your are going to pull of OLD will always be of shittier quality then what you can pull outside of OLD.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/23 12:01 PM
1

That's not the extreme, that's the reality. You have the entire world of people to open up to and trust, why are you choosing to do so with someone who you logically know will negatively impact both the relationship and the attraction that person has for you?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/23 11:49 AM
14

"i understand this statistic is due to there being a much broader dating pool for younger woman ( and they share the top X% of guys more often) but where does it even out?" If your saying this, then you infact do not understand the statistic at all. You are putting blind faith in studies without ever actually looking into it he methodology or the implications of the methodology. The methodology was cold calling LOL. So what you had happen was an absolute influx of STAHMs answering the calls on t…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/23 01:55 AM
–

It's incredible how out of touch posters like you are with the reality of dating women. Have you even looked at stats correlated with autistic men dating? How about stats correlated with ugly men dating?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/23 10:04 AM
1

Wait did you actually think a drop of advice women give men ever works? 99% of you would be dead in the water clueless dating your own sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 08:11 AM
1

Your phrasing this as if 60% isn't the bare minimum cutoff. And yes I did say "absolutely provided for". The way men and women statistically split bills a man earning 60% of the income is essentially providing for the whole marriage. Women don't get to the 80% of all consumer spending statistic by some magic metric.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/23 03:56 AM
2

Lol when you do all the mathematics for a problem on a math test and realize you've done the entire equation wrong. I was talking about her first statement, she was claiming 50% of women are the main provider, and 50% of men are. This is false. 50% of men are the main provider, 30% eglatarian and 20% women are.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/23 04:26 AM
1

Can you not read? 20%!! Not half lmfao.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/23 03:06 AM
6

How about mentioning, that your first statistic is false, and that women of previous generations earned more per Capita then late millennials and zoomers.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/23 03:06 AM
6

No we're saying that only 30% of marriages have eglatarian earning and in that only 20% the wife provides .while the majority of childless marriages are completely provided for by the men. Interesting way you phrased and misinterpreted the data.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/23 03:04 AM
1

Your status is a part of your persona. It is a part of you. Go look through the titles of female romance novels, women have sexual interest in all forms of male persona from multimillionare 50 shades of grey man, to buff cowboy. It's the fantasy of the persona and yes it's indeed sexually hot to women. Women's fantasies are filled with not the male physicality but the male persona. In addition If I gave you 10 million dollars into your bank account right now, how would your behavoir change? If y…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/23 12:22 PM
8

Not to be offensive in any way but this is because you don't understand how the sexual psychology of women differs from men. Men don't care about a woman's status, unless it benefited them in a direct way. Women are not men. You can see evidence of necessity of status in all primates primarily chimpanzees, social status is directly correlated towards better access to food and recourses for female chimpanzees, their children end up surviving at higher rates and passing on their genetics. With Hum…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/23 11:38 AM
2

Please go actually read anthropology before going on about this.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/23 09:03 AM
0

I think we need to give these zoomers on here a psych 101 class. Autism is realistically the only popular neurodivergence that has this socially hindered effect. Stop projecting autistic social behavoir on other examples of nuerodivergence.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/23 07:49 AM
0

Thats an interesting way to say your too much of a wimp to handle rejection. Realistically, just be confident is terrible advice, from people who don't understand how confidence works. Confidence is a validation loop for safety in the mind. If at any point you loose validation, your attempt at feeling confident will drop to the ground. You need to learn to internally validate your mind on the conversation itself and not the woman's reactions to that conversation , through self amusement in the c…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/23 08:53 PM
3

He looks like he smells bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/23 08:48 PM
2

You didn't know? The study was bullshit. They used cold calling as the methodology to tell who is single or not. So it basically hyper selected for stay at home moms, and neet male unemployed male nerds. That's why we all dropped it
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/23 08:44 PM
0

Exactly. Completely indicative of sucess. The fact that you don't see many people in the old-school pillars of trp. Is because why would someone who's already become successful in relationships and women stick around post the fact. The guy who coined it is married as are many other redpill old-school contributors. None of them are divorced. That's what happened to virtually every old school trper I know. They simply ended up coupling up with quality women and left the space. Your bias and doubt …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 06:00 AM
0

The lack of evidence you have for the lack of success should say something deeply about your argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 03:54 AM
18

All of the statistics you've been referring to are directly related to age gap relationships having a higher rate of previous marriages and people who have already been married have a higher risk of divorice. Everyone already knows this on ppd and has been talked about to nauseum. What a non post lmao. Men aren't " defending age gap relationships" we don't need to defend them, there's nothing to defend two consenting adults can do whatever they want.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 06:52 AM
3

Lol way to pick the poorest selection of bluecollar jobs.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 04:21 AM
6

According to the legitimate definitions of patriarchy, only kingdoms and empires could be considered patriarchy. Patriarchy has always been a myth.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 03:53 AM
5

We've never been either by definition.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 03:51 AM
2

My thoughts exactly.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/23 07:56 PM
2

There will never be a historical point where women out earn men. The trend of how much women make compared to men is on a a downtrend not vice versa. The jobs women are working now their mothers worked without a college education, this generation of women spent money on student debt without a return.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/23 03:54 PM
3

I'm firmly convinced you have absolutely no clue what the redpill even is.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/23 02:49 PM
3

Realistically. This has absolutely nothing to do with why most men are struggling.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/23 10:37 PM
1

How to announce to the entire PPD sub, that your bf doesn't know how tf with out saying it directly.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/23 06:21 PM
1

Lol imagine being that bad at sex that you legitimately believe this.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/23 06:20 PM
1

How many times are you going to post the same post? Men completely dominate San Francisco's industries.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/23 06:16 PM
8

Well yeah, he's 6'4 as a teen. The caloric intake he would need to of grown that tall and be even at that age would of been astronomical. Tall guys take a while to even out.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/23 02:57 AM
1

Well I wouldn't because explaining both out would verifiably disprove your original point.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/23 03:43 AM
1

Gauranteed more accurate then average google searching.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/23 03:33 AM
1

Yeah thats absolutely not how chat gpt works try again.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/23 03:32 AM
1

Lol I love this comment because it clearly shows you have absolutely zero knowledge on how chat gpt works yet project that onto the poster. Chat gpt is insanely accurate, and a great resource for legal questions.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/23 03:31 AM
1

So let me get this clear, you moved the goal post, of ice age hunter gather to, bull farmer in the third world? And then moved the goal post from normie accountant to some accounting firm manager. Yet still failed. Are you really that mentally weak that the minor upset of feminists not being sensitive enough to suicides makes you think that it hardens the every man?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/23 02:01 AM
1

We are currently still in nature. We are currently still dieing. As for more uncivilized nature. As someone who has met subcivilized hunter gather tribes, yes the men in the tribes are more dominant then everyday man. Simply large amounts of daily physical activity, will make a man more dominant, let alone the harshness of survival in the wild.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/23 08:06 PM
0

So your source is internet incels. Got it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/23 06:00 PM
3

The earliest bonnobo skeletons are 800,000 years old. Before bonobos there were only chimps, that most likely behaved like modern chimps. Humanoids separated from chimps some 7,000,000 years ago, in addition to that the population of bonobos has always been extremely low, currently sitting at 20,000 or so. They are just a modern offshoot from chimps divided by some river in the congo they can't cross.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/23 05:38 PM
1

Meanwhile ugly people continue to breed like flies...
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/23 10:31 AM
3

I believe the third and fourth point are actually false, bonobos aren't matriarchal and can be lead by either gender (although females have a much larger say then chimpanzee females do across the board). They also don't have sex as often as nat Geo would make you believe, and like chimps are incredibly incredibly violent, having many instances of ripping off the faces of humans. Probably one of the most misunderstood species tbh, they also evolved waaaay after the split from chimpanzees to human…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/23 10:10 AM
–

LOL @ women don't smile in public anymore. Where the hell do you guys get this insanity from. It's mind boggling.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/23 08:45 AM
1

Reminder that besides autism all levels of nuerotypical are a net negative and that super socialized people are far more likely to have psychological disorders then the general populous and typically do better with women, including but not limited to, All cluster B disorders Bipolar disorder ADHD
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/23 08:11 AM
1

L O L nuerotypical is about the worst thing you can be when trying to get women. It's the largest negative besides autism. What your seeing is normal people hanging out in normal friend groups.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/23 08:08 AM
4

It's amazing the amount of misstruth people fixate on here. The reason people are dateless has nothing to do with the "bar" in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/23 07:58 AM
-4

"as we've seen in the last few decades" 😂 Yeah, I don't know who this "we" is but that's not apparent, women are very much typically submissive in realitionships and unattracted to male submissive behavoir in relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/23 11:12 PM
-2

Thats not what we're talking about here when we say the word submissive. Try again. Submissive is simply the opposite of dominance.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/23 07:02 PM
-1

Your example is irrelevant to the question, rather is used as a point to push away natural sexuality to an idealized form, built over the past 100 years by feminists. Men are naturally dominant, women are naturally submissive in relationships. No one is forcing either into any category, just in the hole sum of relationships that is the tendency. In the same way you'll see a feminized homosexual man be a bottom and a masculine homosexual be a top. In the same way, men are more likely to be attrac…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/23 06:59 PM
1

Simply the inverse of dominance. Men are attracted to submissive women the same way women are attracted to dominant men.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/23 06:19 PM
2

They aren't, the right has blasted the small percentage of the left who care about cultural issues on the forefront because It invokes the best reactions from their base.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/23 02:21 PM
5

Came here to say this.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/23 02:20 PM
1

Lol you don't understand basic economics If you can't figure out that blue collar men are still the back bone of all economics and societal function. Everything else is just extras.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/23 01:07 PM
1

Your talking in specifics. Men as a whole cannot as a whole, stop pursuing women. There is no free will in that regard. Humans as a whole realistically have quite lower agency then they believe themselves to.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/23 10:23 PM
3

I don't agree with o.p. however let's be logical here. Men don't choose to go for women, it is beyond the capacity of free will, it's inately within us. Men will always pursue women.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/23 04:45 PM
1

Both of your first two counter arguments involve attraction. If a normal modern woman is attracted to a man both sexually and as a romantic prospect, she will go with the flow of courting. The lack of romantic relationships in the modern era are due to less women finding themselves in situations of genuine attraction to the opposite sex because of the rise of dating apps, and the fall of third spaces and bars men can't genuinely produce attraction to women, women can't fall in love with a jpeg o…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/23 02:25 PM
1

Women don't choose to be single or not. Women go with the flow of a suitor approaching and make a decision based upon individual suitors. Her choice selection is irrelevant to how happy he makes her and only relevant that how attracted to him he makes her. Women are unhappy single just as men are, but they are stuck in that position, because they don't naturally pursue. With avenues like OLD providing a less clear male pursuit and less genuine experience many women don't form that attraction to …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/23 01:21 PM
3

It's the fact that you genuinely believe that. That completely pushes you away from any attempt at a good faith argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/23 01:15 PM
–

The only nuerodivergence that truely falls suit with what your saying, is autism, or serious disorders like schitzophrenia. Calling ADHD a social hinderence is laughable. Nuerologicaly ADHD is what would happen if you took the average nuerotypical extroverts brain and clicked it up two decibels. The improvisational skills needed for social interaction are far stronger in people with ADHD then the general populous.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/23 01:41 AM
1

lol the way you guys try to summarize the redpill is always so entertaining. Anything your trying to gain full knowledge of requires systemizing. Systemizing is only one part of TRP. Fully understanding trp actually takes quite a lot of intuition toward the naturalism of human sexuality, but to defend trp you can't use intuition as an argument, because you often times are talking to people devoid of intuition on the particular subject. So any defence or education you've had of trp comes in pure …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/23 09:13 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter