Sepulchritudinous Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	How much does being in shape help you while pursuing girls? Time under tension is where it's at. Research it. People who work out for size usually don't go very heavy.	/r/seduction	08/08/20 11:30 AM
169	Cold approach from a girl's perspective The problem is that a lot of those guys who should read this really wouldn't listen to a girl's perspective though... that's how things got this way in the first place.	/r/seduction	26/06/20 01:15 PM
3	How do I get over the stigma of being a older virgin and attract women? From impressionable boys, porn addicts, pick up artists. Male sexual insecurities are a goldmine for anyone who wants to manipulate guys and sell them junk. Guys look up to players so they assume that women do too lol	/r/seduction	03/06/20 08:16 AM
2	How do I get over the stigma of being a older virgin and attract women? That is a wise perspective that more should acknowledge.	/r/seduction	03/06/20 08:03 AM
8	How do I get over the stigma of being a older virgin and attract women? Dude relax. Why do you assume you're not gonna get laid? I understand that med school is stressful and time consuming, but it doesn't make sex impossible. And, I mean, it's a school, there are other people there. Including people who could potentially be having sex with you, right? Why "make up" for years that were "lost?" It's not a race lol. Nobody's measuring your "score," except possibly you, but that's entirely optional. Why does it matter? Especially if your dedication to your life is what…	/r/seduction	02/06/20 10:37 PM
25	How do I get over the stigma of being a older virgin and attract women? It's all in your head, really. And unless you're literally going around saying "I'm a virgin," there's literally no way that girls would reject you over something they can't fucking know. Girls generally don't give a shit about your body count or how it compares to theirs. That's mostly a dude thing. Either way, 22 isn't high these days. It really isn't. I know several guys in their mid-late 20s who still haven't had any sexual experience whatsoever. Even a girl or two. We're living in strange t…	/r/seduction	02/06/20 08:21 PM
3	Dating apps are bullshit Agreed. But this subreddit is almost exclusively about the kind of "seduction" guys apply to snag random girls they just met. Applying the same stuff to a partner/spouse, in my experience, just doesn't work. But props if it works for you, and for the fact that you're putting in the effort.	/r/seduction	18/05/20 09:41 PM
4	Dating apps are bullshit "Going strong," and yet you're on a seduction forum... something doesn't check out lol	/r/seduction	18/05/20 09:25 PM
2	so this happens None of the multi-move strategies presented are only considering the now lol It's always a game of prediction. Your "best strategy" presumes that the opponent plays one specific (and suboptimal) way. That isn't good anticipation. And there's nothing preventing the opponent from taking the knight after the Nxd7 if he has any idea what he's doing. Really, the only way black could lose in this particular setup is if he made a huge rookie (pun intended) mistake. A good strategy requires you to look …	/r/seduction	01/03/20 02:53 PM
1	so this happens And that is exactly why pawn chicks keep orbiter exes around. A free ride to the upgrade.	/r/seduction	01/03/20 02:16 PM
2	so this happens There's not even a bishop in the picture...	/r/seduction	01/03/20 02:14 PM
2	so this happens Umm, no... unless the rook moves away from the pawn's lane, you're not gonna take that pawn. You'd have to either sacrifice a piece to get the pawn to move to another lane, force the rook to move by threatening it, or back up the offense with a bishop or something to deter the rook from taking the knight. In other words, a big menacing wingman is the way to go.	/r/seduction	01/03/20 02:13 PM
1	I did 27 approaches in 367 minutes of daygame infield. Here are my results We were talking about scaling though lol. If this one two-reply number was the result from 27, we can estimate that 270 approaches would give you a mere ten of those barely responsive numbers. And that would be around 60 hours of approaching. Since your number of actual leads is still ZERO, it's not looking good. 1 of the 4 numbers was real, but didn't lead anywhere. Let's assume a similar ratio for convos that actually get going. And then a similar one for ones leading to a first date. That's a…	/r/seduction	26/02/20 10:23 AM
1	I did 27 approaches in 367 minutes of daygame infield. Here are my results Haha. I do well on dates. If you don't even get a proper responsive number with this large volume, we can conclude that your game is shit, to use your terminology. Your stats are bad. But sure, the guy who only gets two texts before being ghosted does great on dates. The fact that you're posting a thread like this here wouldn't even happen if your game was good. And the fact that you get so offended by people's posts confirms it.	/r/seduction	25/02/20 11:54 PM
2	I did 27 approaches in 367 minutes of daygame infield. Here are my results Sure, I'm the one with the big ego... I wasn't talking about myself to begin with. Reading comprehension, lol My dates tend to go great. But OP is struggling, and that's what we're talking about here. Look at those stats in the original post. They're horrible. And with that little original interest, dates are going to be an even bigger hurdle. It's that simple. And this is where most guys are at. Again, I challenge you to provide one example of someone "converting 1 out of 3 dates into something…	/r/seduction	25/02/20 05:50 PM
3	I did 27 approaches in 367 minutes of daygame infield. Here are my results Most guys can definitely replicate it. It's actually pretty easy if you stop wasting time on pointless things like chasing droves of random women. And it pays off much better, so technically, I'd say it IS an easy way. The only ones acting judgey and hateful here are the daygamers who can't stand to have their fragile egos questioned. People like you and OP who fly into a rage and call people assholes and whatnot. It's really ironic how you project your own judgment and hatred onto the chill peo…	/r/seduction	25/02/20 05:44 PM
2	I did 27 approaches in 367 minutes of daygame infield. Here are my results This guy is throwing hissy fits at the people offering help. He's spreading negativity and ignorance and defeatism, and overall being mean-spirited about the whole seduction thing. Calling him out on his bullshit isn't being judgmental. This isn't a sub dedicated to approaching. It's a sub dedicated to seduction, dating, and connection. Read the "about community" header, and you'll see why we're saying the things we're saying. Trawling is ineffective, dehumanizing, and not really about any form …	/r/seduction	25/02/20 02:11 PM
1	I did 27 approaches in 367 minutes of daygame infield. Here are my results Verifying it is easy. Ask people in relationships where they found their partners. Ask people with a lively rotation where they found their partners. I doubt you'll ever hear daygame as an answer lol And the fact that daygamers just continue daygaming for ages is enough proof that they're not really getting actual dates. How often do you see self-developed people whining about not getting any girls? They find more opportunities because they're attractive and because they don't waste time chasing…	/r/seduction	25/02/20 01:46 PM
0	I did 27 approaches in 367 minutes of daygame infield. Here are my results This sounds like the standard offended message. If what you're saying were anywhere close to true, you wouldn't react like this. You wouldn't even be here. First of all, OP is trying to find a date/girlfriends. So your mostly-imaginary n-count is irrelevant. And yeah, if you've actually been in the game for several decades, there's nothing impressive about triple digits to begin with lol. You could get there with three lays a years, so... yeah... those aren't good numbers, mate. Especially since…	/r/seduction	25/02/20 01:29 PM
0	I did 27 approaches in 367 minutes of daygame infield. Here are my results Hmm, who's the raging bitch here? I'm just calmly giving advice, and you're freaking out. You're running around despereate for female attention and getting rejected left and right and pretending like you're seeing success just because you got two text messages from one girl. What was that thing about no basis in reality again? Definitely looks like you're the chode. Who even still uses that word? And you're calling someone else judgey... lol No wonder you're lonely.	/r/seduction	25/02/20 01:13 PM
2	I did 27 approaches in 367 minutes of daygame infield. Here are my results It may never happen for someone whose life revolves around desperately chasing random girls on the street and fighting with people on the internet. Everything about your mentality exudes bad vibes, and girls don't respond favorably to that. A guy who's out there enjoying his life and not looking for validation or needily seeking dates will get a lot more looks. And even if it's just a few openings per month, these are good openings where the woman is already interested and responsive, and our at…	/r/seduction	25/02/20 01:10 PM
5	I did 27 approaches in 367 minutes of daygame infield. Here are my results I'm assuming that you do have the brain capacity to understand that when people give examples such as classes, those are just EXAMPLES. Use your brain and you'll see that there are opportunities everywhere. It's not passive or slow, and the opportunities are more likely to yield. Plus, the yield is usually better. Scaling a dysfunctional method isn't a good approach to anything. Maximum output for minimum gain. You're saying "it WORKS" when your original post shows how you just spent 6 hours and…	/r/seduction	25/02/20 12:39 PM
2	I did 27 approaches in 367 minutes of daygame infield. Here are my results That's their choice. And just because you're replacing one shitty strategy with another doesn't mean you're not using a shitty strategy. And Tinder doesn't require much time or energy, really. Trawling the streets for random girls isn't "stuff that works." The OP just confirms this. Out of all these approaches and hours spent, he didn't even get one actual lead. Even if he'd get a date within a month or two, most dates don't lead to more dates or sex. Even when they do, it's usually back to squa…	/r/seduction	25/02/20 12:21 PM
5	I did 27 approaches in 367 minutes of daygame infield. Here are my results Dude... I didn't say anything about being on the sidelines or waiting lol Getting into the right situations and talking to girls is taking action. Taking right action. Not just banging your head against the wall and talking numbers like some desperate creep. This is why you're running around getting rejected like a chode, while I've had actual success. You know, getting real connections, getting great responses to approaches, even having some girls make the first move. I've had actual love resul…	/r/seduction	24/02/20 11:57 PM
6	I did 27 approaches in 367 minutes of daygame infield. Here are my results That's just not true. And I think you're shooting yourself in the foot with this mentality. Pickup stuff isn't very good for getting an actual girlfriend in general. And the fact that you put this much time and energy into approaching random girls sends some really bad signals. First of all, it indicates neediness, whether or not that's true. Also, the fact that you're just approaching droves of random girls based on looks and with no context definitely sends bad signals and won't exactly make t…	/r/seduction	24/02/20 10:55 PM
3	I did 27 approaches in 367 minutes of daygame infield. Here are my results The exact type of girls? Perhaps if we're only talking looks, but even that is a stretch. And OP is clearly looking for someone to date, not just a random pull. So, seeing girls completely out of context in their professional mode isn't gonna be a good indicator for how appealing they are as girlfriends or even sexually. Cold approach daygame is bullshit. Volume is bullshit. If you spend all that time playing a needy numbers game with really bad odds, you're just wasting time. Daygame is mostly …	/r/seduction	24/02/20 10:43 PM
1	Guys who are highly successful with women, was it always that way for you? Nah, confidence isn't about external factors. And I'm curious about what you think it would be that attracted these women when I was at rock bottom and had nothing going for me.	/r/seduction	12/02/20 08:20 PM
1	Guys who are highly successful with women, was it always that way for you? lol I'm sure this suspicious, antagonistic, pessimism takes you a lot of great places. You must be really happy and fun to be around. /s You sound like the average virgin keyboard jockey who really just hates people.	/r/seduction	05/02/20 10:40 AM
3	Guys who are highly successful with women, was it always that way for you? It's nice to see an actual woman among all the self-proclaimed "experts on women," and I'm sorry that you got downvoted. What you describe is not unusual. It's normal. And the ability to have a real conversation is a huge success factor. Not just making it about flirting/seduction/game, but actually interacting like humans. To the guys reading this, what you need to realize is that women want real interaction with a real person. And real talk covers all the various elements that you try to subst…	/r/seduction	04/02/20 09:53 PM
5	Guys who are highly successful with women, was it always that way for you? Confidence isn't conditional. You don't need anything to be confident. Being happy about your possessions isn't confidence, it's egoic pride. It's very conditional, addictive, and not really real. Lose the stuff, and that "confidence" is gone. The stuff owns you, rather than you owning it. The women are attracted to those things, rather than the man behind it. An actual confident person is indifferent in that regard. This feeling that you need to "earn" confidence or happiness is complete bullsh…	/r/seduction	04/02/20 08:18 PM
1	Guys who are highly successful with women, was it always that way for you? The way you're reacting makes it seem like there's definitely a value statement or some kind of hangup at play. The height thing is really exaggerated. It's like women saying men like huge tits or super skinny girls. Many do, but it's no universal rule. Women are individuals, they have different preferences. Some like skinny dudes, some like muscle, some like dad bods, some like beards and others hate it. Some swoon over nice faces, and others don't care about faces. Some like cockiness, and oth…	/r/seduction	04/02/20 08:12 PM
1	Chasing Women Vs. Attracting Women Not really a relevant question, because it shouldn't affect frequency of masturbation. Plus, sex and masturbation don't have the same effect on the brain. One is doing exactly what our nature is designed to reward us for, the other is hijacking part of that system for instant gratification. Repetitive instant gratification is bad for the brain in general, even without the specific side effects of masturbation. It triggers the behavioral sink effect and makes you more dependent on pleasure and sp…	/r/seduction	11/11/19 08:06 PM
0	Chasing Women Vs. Attracting Women If you can't go a day without it, that's an addiction. It's needy as fuck. Addiction is weak and unhealthy and unattractive. Hijacking your reward system makes you numb to life, unmotivated and mentally dull, not the present and intense vibe that gets women excited. Ejaculating converts testosterone into a mildly toxic chemical that makes you slow and tired, and contributez to accelerated hair loss. You always tell who's a frequent masturbator and not, if just pay attention. Different vibe, diff…	/r/seduction	10/11/19 01:14 PM
1	Chasing Women Vs. Attracting Women Going without release for longer periods consistenly makes me last LONGER, not shorter. In fact, it can even be hard to get off in action sometimes. A week definitely makes it harder to hold back, but over a month always seems to make it easier as long as I stay physically active and mentally still.	/r/seduction	10/11/19 01:04 PM