TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SerialMurderer Archive

View 0 posts and 103 comments by SerialMurderer on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Seems very unlikely.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/01/26 07:06 AM
1

Yes. Trump support has collapsed the most among young men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/01/26 10:58 PM
1

I could be being charitable here, but it seems they meant “counter-intuitive” referring to the naive, purely uninformed view. Niki Scordi, Chair of the Board of Trustees at the Woman's Trust, told Sky News that although the fight against VAWG has always been led by women, they recognise that the issues also affect men. "Many women's charities also support male victims of these sorts of crimes, so it is appropriate that the government are also trying to support all victims as well. Many of the pe…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/12/25 08:24 PM
3

“Empathy is not a sin”, they say. Then why do they act like this?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/12/25 07:45 PM
1

Also the iron dome vote. I actually hadn’t heard of this at all.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/12/25 07:24 PM
10

“Yeah but… men did it to themselves.”
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/10/25 06:08 PM
1

You don’t get do-overs. Practice freebies do not exist. And there is no queen of England.
/r/seduction23/08/25 02:53 PM
1

Ah yes, just like the Freedmen’s Bureau was for answering the “problem with”…?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/03/25 10:58 PM
1

So… “patriarchy” is just capitalism and not its own system?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/03/25 10:21 PM
2

Are you drunk? Why are so many people admitting they didn’t read the post they’re complaining about?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/03/25 10:21 PM
1

Mindy Kaling is considered “phenomenal” in anything? If this wasn’t confirmation this world sucks, I don’t know what is.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/24 11:07 PM
2

…Not doing something is a very easy and immediately actionable way to live by. I’ll take “mystical sounding quote, so it must be true, but is also wholly inapplicable to scenario” for 500.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/24 10:52 PM
3

It is paired in their depiction of an ideal man with the exact proportions of marble statues.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/11/24 06:59 PM
17

You can go back at least 40 years to the He-Man cartoons (or should I say ancient Greece and their statues of gods?), it's always been like that. Well… there is one thing Ancient Greece idealized in the male physique that certainly isn’t incorporated today.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/11/24 07:25 PM
14

“Extreme left” here just means “unhinged”. I don’t think many of the historically more relevant branches of the far left were at all feminist, for example. Could be wrong, but I really think most times people talk about “extremes” they’re more often referring to how unhinged a position is instead of how far an ideology is in a direction.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/11/24 04:42 AM
3

The TV show? Eh, it was okay.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/11/24 04:19 AM
5

I’d like to boggle some minds by pointing out this existed similarly in the Roman Empire.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/09/24 01:07 PM
0

As opposed to the compassionate, never aggressive, and always perfect conservatives and liberals working on the problem? What do you mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/24 11:54 PM
1

Is this beyond reasonable doubt?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/09/24 04:56 PM
1

Grouping “women couldn’t vote prior to 1920” with “feminist lies” seems extremely off-kilter. Evidence of women voting in the colonial era doesn’t mean much when states that initially allowed (certain) women to vote all reversed course more than a century before the constitutional amendment.
/r/MensRights04/09/24 04:25 PM
2

This would make a lot of people’s brains explode.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/09/24 04:58 PM
2

when they repealed affirmative action for university applications when it started benefitting men instead. Where was this?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/08/24 04:53 PM
1

Sojourner Truth was born Isabella Baumfree, in 1797 in Ulster County, New York. Truth ran from her master in 1827 after he went back on his promise of her freedom. She became a preacher and an activist throughout the 1840s–1850s.[1]She delivered her speech, "Ain't I a Woman?", at the Women's Rights Convention in 1851. Truth questions the treatment of white women compared to Black women. Seemingly pointing out a man in the room, Truth says, "That man over there says that women need to be helped i…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/08/24 08:42 PM
1

I would think that coherent uses of “patriarchy” all refer to a social system that merely overlaps with economic and political systems.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/08/24 08:27 PM
6

That explains a lot of logic of the tweets screenshotted in that creepy female teacher epidemic video. Edit: One of the comments on the NYT article got it spot on, though I’m surprised it was open as late as 2022. It is despicable that people so familiar with the tools of feminist analysis of power relations in the context of sexual abuse should change their tune in such a blatant display of tribal favouritism, echoing so precisely the patriarchal excusers whose failings they are so familiar wit…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/24 09:23 PM
2

Are any of the news outlets that reported on this going to report an update that completely recontextualizes a story they already put out there? …Is there ever going to be a law that requires them to? No on both counts? Right then.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/24 09:00 PM
3

In that same article The Root has a “cheat sheet” titled “What is Intersectionality”. I’m very close to skull emoji’ing that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/24 08:46 PM
1

What is “the woke shit”?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/24 08:40 PM
6

While men can be shamed for it, especially if unrequited (though more amorally there), women are liberated for it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/06/24 11:09 PM
21

Someone had commented on a video essay saying “I think it's kinda strange how this comic is allegedly for girls, like straight girls who want to relate to Persephone and sexualize Hades, yet Persephone is the character who's sexualized way more. I just don't get why that is.” To which someone else replied, “It's because you're supposed to see yourself in Persephone. She's the young (female) reader's self-insert. You get to date sexy Hades through her. So of course you want your self-insert to be…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/06/24 11:51 AM
1

I think you’ve completely missed the forest for the trees here. The “left wing” part is essential precisely because it’s left wing, not for the external perception of men’s advocacy. It is specifically for a space on the left that is almost entirely sidelined from the discussion.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/06/24 11:44 AM
1

I mostly agree, but I don’t believe any region other than those already mostly occupied by Russia actually align more closely with it considering Ukrainian political history both since 1991 and especially in recent years.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/06/24 11:41 AM
5

I think that’s a mistaken comparison, since it assumes that men actually are responsible here.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/06/24 11:31 AM
5

I think that explains Lore Olympus.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/06/24 11:27 AM
7

Yeah, that really is just a non-racialized “divestment movement”.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/06/24 08:26 AM
1

Why older specifically?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/06/24 03:05 AM
3

Not even a conviction guarantees that, unfortunately. Without witnessing it, the only guarantee can come from doubtless evidence confirming the claim. And as mentioned elsewhere, it’s exceedingly difficult to gather that airtight evidence for victims.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/06/24 02:49 AM
1

And when it was, it was with caste characteristics.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/06/24 08:47 PM
1

I don’t know of many people who would think that of the Antebellum (pre-Civil War) South. Juries were remarkably fair.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/06/24 08:44 PM
2

If it weren’t for Till’s mother being in the frame of that photo, would publicizing it have garnered nearly as much outrage as it did?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/06/24 02:14 PM
1

That feature was curiously absent from the Antebellum South.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/06/24 02:04 PM
1

Most people operate under the assumption they are correct, more at 12.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/06/24 06:10 PM
1

Most people operate under the assumption they are correct, shocking.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/06/24 06:09 PM
3

men moving to the right I have yet to see data suggesting this. What I have seen so far are younger generations not trending rightward contemporaneously to older generations, and, when it comes to gender, specifically young women shifting sharply leftward while young men have fluctuated around the same points.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/06/24 06:05 PM
-1

That’s everywhere on the political spectrum. Only in this sub could it be deemed a left wing phenomenon.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/06/24 05:53 PM
3

I’m not sure I see how the videos are polar opposites. I’ve watched most of the latter and it seems to just be a breakdown of the data on men approaching women, the outcomes for it, and the reasons for men not approaching or for women rejecting men, how a majority of men who avoid approaching women also regretting it is probably not a good omen, etc. According to that data, 75% of women want to be approached. But these two (women btw) said a lot of that is more wanting validation from attention …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/06/24 04:01 PM
1

Who invited Drake?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/24 07:27 PM
1

I don’t think that’s how quotas work… at all…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/05/24 01:57 PM
5

Sure, Jan.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/05/24 02:40 AM
10

Didn’t the woman who accused Emmett Till of whistling admit she lied about it anyway?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/05/24 03:47 PM
2

I should really thank you for the rabbit hole I went down from just that one video featuring Tommy Curry. Some of it was retreated ground, like The Psychology of Racism in Jim Crow America, but most of was entirely from there.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/05/24 10:19 PM
1

Much less so, honestly. I’d argue there’s more racism than there is misandry, but also that a good amount of that is “ironically” (it’s not ironic) from misandry.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/05/24 03:50 AM
1

Man, I wish men were real.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/05/24 07:33 PM
1

I certainly wouldn’t expect that to be the case. I can see why a bias would make sense (though that’s not what you’re referring to) but “aware/sensitive to the problems of other men” isn’t aligning right with what I understand of cultural history.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/05/24 03:25 PM
2

Coincidentally, in one of my many internal ramblings about the rational basis for all human behavior assumed in microeconomics and widespread in philosophy, the “humans are social creatures” quote popped into my head. Weighing the two, the scales seem so clearly I’m the latter’s favor I was confused how I had never thought of both simultaneously up until now.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/05/24 06:47 PM
2

There’s an unhinged “movement” on the internet about black women “divesting” from black men on account of… we’ll think of every male stereotype but exclusively pushed on black men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/04/24 11:15 PM
2

They’d probably be very welcome on Quora. Few sane people remain there.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/04/24 11:13 PM
2

If you think the general state of things is bad, wait till you hear about the “divest” movement. Craziest stuff I’ve heard.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/04/24 11:20 AM
2

I Kant believe you would say such a thing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/04/24 03:39 PM
2

Conscription obviously isn’t a privilege, but enlistment… is though? Serving in the military, voluntarily, is more often a status symbol than not (at least in uncontroversial wars), isn’t it? The preference to exclude black soldiers despite this meaning white soldiers would face more of the brunt of the violence doesn’t make sense if you think of military service this way. Vietnam was the opposite/“normal” way for the first time in history.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/04/24 03:29 PM
1

Are you saying they believe men aren’t the majority because of that, or that men make up 49% because of shorter lives?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/24 05:53 PM
1

Certainly. But regardless of whether the women involved were largely willing accessories or willing instigators, mass racial violence was not primarily driven by women nor feminism but white supremacy and the women and feminists in league with it. IIRC, (white) feminist arguments drifted towards white supremacy as a means of legitimizing (white) feminism during the nadir of American race relations from 1890 to 1917. I believe Manliness and Civilization is a good read on it but you could otherwis…
/r/MensRights02/05/23 02:27 AM
1

Isn’t the U.S-U.K typically the main focus here? There appear to be remarkably similar political trends throughout the Anglosphere. Also I said the “apex” of the left wing party in reference to the 1960s where New Deal liberal Democrats effectively broke the conservative coalition that had for so long opposed them only for the end of the decade and beyond to yield disastrous results (more so when Reagan rolled around).
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/04/23 10:47 PM
1

Gen Xers could not have experienced “the left wing party” at its apex (ironically when it still contained avid white supremacists in its leadership) and in its current state it seems to be making a rebound from more moderate to conservative economic domestic agendas. I’m not exactly sure what you mean. It “helps” that we have a two party system in place where even if a party as a whole collapses in on itself or goes against its very ethos it can’t really be adequately punished by the electorate.…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/04/23 10:36 PM
0

Both Millennials and Gen Z are maintaining a left wing streak for far longer than those sustained by elder generational cohorts. While the bulk of that is driven by women, men aren’t contrarily shifting rightward as women do the opposite.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/04/23 10:14 PM
1

The left has never had a majority of men in American history. So it would be winning them for the first time, unless by “the left” you mean liberals from LBJ to Obama. In which case we still run into the issue.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/04/23 10:11 PM
1

Eh… plenty didn’t even require the involvement of a white woman, and with some that did those “confessions” could be coerced through the usual means of ostracization, shaming, denying the benevolent sexism granted to womanhood, and so on. Just to clarify, obviously while the primary participants were seeking to reinforce manhood they built around racial supremacy there were plenty of white women who were willing accessories or even agitators themselves.
/r/MensRights05/04/23 04:08 PM
1

And yet, somehow I can’t help but feel there’s crossover with the manosphere.
/r/MensRights17/02/23 03:35 PM
1

Okay but what would a red pill society look like? Not even the 1800s qualified (excluding the South for some people).
/r/MensRights17/02/23 03:32 PM
1

Also is it just me or is this specific page broken in the Reddit app?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/23 05:32 PM
2

Understandable. I rarely hear any discussion about how black men have been traditionally excluded or how their exclusion was made essential to what was a strictly white patriarchy (though I believe MGTOW/redpill/MRA has a tendency for reich-wing). Even if it accidentally could benefit black men, in which case it was often “corrected” with brutal violence. So when black men did, against all odds, prevail and replicate the self-made man they were punished instead of given the ‘rightful’ reward. If…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/23 05:14 PM
1

The heroic artisan (there’s overlap with yeomen), genteel patriarch, Christian gentleman, and the capitalistic self-made man. You know, traditional archetypes? I’m surprised this isn’t more prominent on subs like these with all the focus on a “crisis of masculinity”. Edit: Funny thing this reminds me of; it used to be expected of boys (at least those who would go into the professional middle class) to form what most of us might consider overly-intimate friendships before expecting to get married…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/23 05:01 PM
1

You guys do realize there have been plenty of distinct models for “producing” manhood men have staked their masculinity on, right? And that’s JUST American masculinities. Law-abiding restraint isn’t and hasn’t been “unmanly” for lots of people throughout U.S history.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/23 04:53 PM
1

Sorry for being late here but I have to ask; How? If anything wouldn’t this sound or be accused of misandry? It sounds like something a cheater would use to justify themselves.
/r/AllPillDebate12/11/22 02:55 PM
2

The pseudoscience that resurfaced in the mainstream with the efforts of Philippe Rushton and others.
/r/MensRights01/11/22 11:10 PM
2

Mainly the ones I’d describe as akin to social democrats but they mainly do so indirectly in economic policy supporting the working class.
/r/MensRights01/11/22 11:05 PM
2

The only political organization supportive of newly freed ex-slaves then promptly abandoned them to the rule of a sadistically hostile cabal of white supremacists and soon embraced the prevailing view that pinned the blame on them for their own infidelity leaving little distinction between it and the aforementioned cabal on the matter of race relations.
/r/MensRights01/11/22 11:00 PM
2

And yet, in a stunning twist, the ones advancing today’s race science are conservatives.
/r/MensRights01/11/22 10:56 PM
2

The racist vote went for “the white man’s party” at first, though it should be mentioned those who did not believe in the equality of the races existed among even abolitionists (the SJWS of the era). After Republicans dropped any semblance of a civil rights plank on their national platform (mounting no defense against grievous assaults on black Americans and making no push for Reconstruction-like policies) they became VERY attractive to the racist vote. …Outside of the South because of obvious r…
/r/MensRights01/11/22 10:54 PM
2

It doesn’t matter because no matter who does what nobody “owes” anyone their votes. The Republican Party of the 1880s, 90s, 1900s, 1910s, and 1920s did this. Look where that got them. By 1960 black voters are pivotal in securing not Republican electoral victories but DEMOCRATIC electoral victories. “Muh lowest unemployment” has no merit as an argument without considering the compensation these jobs entail. In Bill Clinton’s inauguration speech he listed falling wages as a primary source of conce…
/r/MensRights01/11/22 10:30 PM
2

It was deemed the paramilitary wing of the Democratic Party but that may or may not have had something to do with the fact that Democrats were the party of the planter class in the South and largely unpopular in the North until the New Deal. If the point is to demonstrate the vital role Democrats played in enforcing white supremacy then good on you, you actually know something. But if that wasn’t the case, and you believe the ethos of the Democratic Party of not one but TWO party systems ago is …
/r/MensRights01/11/22 10:22 PM
2

There’s no hope for y’all. Zero understanding of political history.
/r/MensRights01/11/22 10:07 PM
2

The Mulford Act was passed by Reagan in response to armed black “leftists radicals” you’d hate just the same if they were here today. We know what happens when everyone explains to you what the party switch was and yet you fail to reconcile the actual history with your sanitized view of one party’s political history. “tHe rAdiCaL lEfT” both acknowledges and decries the political history of the Democratic Party whereas conservatives can never seem to get it through their skulls that Republicans s…
/r/MensRights01/11/22 10:04 PM
2

I’ve never actually seen that acronym before, is it new?
/r/MensRights29/10/22 09:26 PM
1

At the same time mobs of white men gathered to do a little trolling lynching, maybe even a bit of a pogrom, the feminist movement wasn’t particularly concerned which is interesting given how much emphasis was placed on “protecting white women” from “black brutes” in the public imagination.
/r/MensRights28/10/22 08:24 PM
1

This is legitimately terrible. Men created the Klan is not only an incomplete truth its almost a downright lie considering the context of its creation was racial and not specifically gendered. In fact, given your acknowledgement of women lacking the right to vote, the Klan’s racial terrorism is gendered specifically targeting black men. It’s men targeting men not because of gender but because of race. And what the hell is the “the first slave owner was a black man” article supposed to be saying?
/r/MensRights28/10/22 08:12 PM
2

This right here is why I can’t stand the majority of the rhetoric surrounding feminism when it’s coming from white conservatives who will try their damndest to ignore and downplay race while elevating the woes of specifically white men above all others when it’s been constantly proven otherwise. It all rings hollow knowing the overlap exists.
/r/MensRights28/10/22 08:04 PM
1

Only 3% of the research focused upon marginalized men (i.e., BME) with none focusing on working class men, disabled men or LGBT men (which is counter to evidence that homelessness, suicide, workplace deaths and incarceration disproportionately affect such groups of men relative to other men). Is this still/at all verifiable?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/22 08:31 PM
1

Well that seems like it wouldn’t apply in most states ramping up reproductive or voting restrictions or keeping up conversion therapy largely catering to what the conservative base wants. But in that case I’d argue those places are just anti-human (or 99%?).
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/22 07:04 PM
1

I love how the protests against the shelter for homeless men employed the same conservative tactics to demonize the homeless with “drugs and crime” and it just works in New York City of all places.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/22 06:57 PM
1

Breaking: people aren’t allowed to express disagreement with opinions in whatever way they want
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/22 01:31 AM
0

Saying things like “mEn aRe aTTrAcTed tO yOuth” is what gives those types a bad reputation, especially given how that’s the justification for pedophilia.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/22 01:30 AM
1

I can certainly see the constraints placed on the sexuality of men of color, especially in the 1800s, but that seems to have been driven by figures like Rebecca Latimer Felton and her husband in conjunction with the doctrine of racial superiority and ‘ownership’ of white women that was so prevalent at the time of Wilmington’s insurrection.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/22 01:22 AM
1

Is r/MensLib one of those?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/22 12:36 AM
1

Red alarm for a potentially abusive relationship, a general POS, or specifically a sex offender POS. That’s how I’ve seen it used.
/r/seduction05/08/22 02:46 AM
1

You just acknowledge heightism and then proceeded to mock people below 6’4 anyway?
/r/seduction29/07/22 03:38 PM
1

Conventionally handsome
/r/seduction29/07/22 02:34 PM
1

Yes because insulting people inspires them to “do better”. Ffs, you still manage to have a savior complex too.
/r/seduction29/07/22 02:23 PM
1

None whatsoever. Just do it peasant. (/s)
/r/seduction29/07/22 02:19 PM
1

Ngl, a lot of these were just really bad, bad faith, and purely rhetorical arguments on both parties.
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre18/04/21 04:18 PM
1

Yikes. Wtf did Reddit bring me to.
/r/askTRP14/12/20 11:51 PM
2

You forgot to say "eDiT: jUst kIddInG LoL, pEopLE aRe tOO sEnSiTiVE"
/r/PussyPassDenied31/10/19 11:53 PM
0

Is it u/lookatamirror?
/r/PussyPassDenied31/10/19 12:32 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter