TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SesQuans Archive

View 0 posts and 30 comments by SesQuans on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I am not talking about ones friends, they are normally exempt from such restrictions. Not sure what workplace you are where you can "say whatever you want", if you insult your boss or customers you are generally punished or fired. So if i am not mistaken you want to have the freedom to call whoever it is whatever you want right? You can do that, but you then need to accept repercussions, like getting banned from websites, thrown out from school/any institute, being insulted , getting a SLAP laws…
/r/MensRights26/11/19 09:33 AM
3

As for work, be professional, but you can choose to not call someone something else if He/She dosen't work for you. Can you do that? Can I call you Miss because I dont think you are manly enough to be called Mister? Is violating the work contract ok for you? (Most companies have anti bullying paragraphs) Society doesn't like outliers... it likes conformity, and anyone that sticks out will be pointed out as such. Thats called bullying... and i would not say that most guys mock and bully people or…
/r/MensRights21/11/19 02:46 PM
1

I will ignore your confusion about gender and sex and go straight for the points i need clarification, don't get to dictate that someone else acknowledges you as a woman, and treats you as such Can you explain what treatment you are denying? (Nonsexual of course) Also, if you are obviously a man, and you have a woman's name, you are not free from questions/ ridicule/ mockery. This is about Transmen but sure lets give it a go, how do you define "questions/ ridicule/ mockery" at a workplace or at …
/r/MensRights20/11/19 03:38 PM
1

Of course it does, you are just really bad at using google. Use quotation marks if you want something word by word.
/r/MensRights20/11/19 02:53 PM
2

Can you explain why they are delusional? Is calling them by whatever (normal) name they want ok for you?
/r/MensRights20/11/19 02:42 PM
1

I did not really doubt any of the first two claims, worldwide it is nearly guaranteed to find such data. But this makes him not less of a Troll. The third paragraph, which is his interpretation of his first two claims, is just wrong. Even if only 10% of all teachers were male, that would not even closely get to his mentioned 8/10ish chance (Because you have more than a single teacher).
/r/MensRights28/10/19 01:09 PM
1

@Boer1 Is a troll and idiot, he wont give out sources or defend his third paragraph.
/r/MensRights25/10/19 12:51 PM
1

If you provide information/facts then normally you would need to provides sources to proof these are correct ones. But lets assume the first two numbers are correct, how did you get these numbers of the third paragraph? First you round up 43% to 50% and then you assumed that a student (elementary is assume, since the average highschool has 43% male teachers ) has only a single teacher to even get close to the "8/10is chance of 100% influence at school" (female influence). I would have assumed yo…
/r/MensRights25/10/19 10:43 AM
1

I am really confused how people just blindly believe that the "8/10ish chance of 100% (female) influence at school" can be correct. I know that people struggle with stochastics , but assumed that a student has 5 teachers (which is a absurdly low number) then the chance to get 100% female staff is not even close to 80%, assumed the 78% figure is correct it would be 28,8%.
/r/MensRights25/10/19 10:32 AM
0

I really hope that this is sarcasm and not your only problem with these numbers.
/r/MensRights24/10/19 02:02 PM
-2

This post or rather this whole sub is not against abortions. Calling abortion murder seems to be very backward and against what MR stands for.
/r/MensRights07/06/19 01:34 PM
3

so if a woman finds abortion morally reprehensible and feels that they want to keep it, then the man who is the father should't get off scot free (there is such thing as safe & responsible sex). If woman is brave enough to take on the responsibility of raising the child, then the other party responsible for the pregnancy should be responsible for the costs. That is the same arguments that Pro-Lifers take, you get pregant so take responsibility for it. They find abortions morally reprehensible an…
/r/MensRights07/06/19 01:08 PM
1

You made claims without sources AND without even numbers. Yet you want me to do your work and search for them? Sure buddy, that not how it works. And about the smegma, did you try to wash yourself at least once a week? (I believe you spoke out of experience) Not sure what you expect if you dont wash yourself for weeks.
/r/MensRights16/04/19 09:52 AM
4

I don't know a lot of percentages of things that I do, like get a vaccine but I do it because those that do know the percentages recommend it over not doing it. Yes, that is called blindly believing authorities without questioning them. They did when they introduced circumcision in the USA, it was really effective in preventing masturbation right? (Don't ask what they wanted to do with girls) You are actually the one who is supposed to bring percentages to the contrary. No... you need to prove a…
/r/MensRights10/04/19 03:00 PM
2

First i need to say that i really dislike Trump, but I hate it if people insult him for things he is not, like "gay-hating". And if you question them, then you must be a Trump apologist and enabler.
/r/MensRights10/04/19 01:51 PM
4

Why do you ignore my questions about the positive effects you claimed? I will agree with you if it significantly improves the health of a person, but you need to provide numbers. How likely are it to get Disease A and how likely is it that circumcision prevents it?
/r/MensRights10/04/19 01:32 PM
6

A decreased risk of urinary tract infections How many percent was it again? A reduced risk of some sexually transmitted diseases in men How many percent if you sleep with that person 1, 10 or 100 times ? Protection against penile cancer How high is the chance again to get penile cancer and how much does it circumcision protect against it? ... Why not let the boy decide when he is old enough?
/r/MensRights10/04/19 12:11 PM
4

Just circumcise they boy if it is medically needed(Doctor needs to evaluate this) or if he is old enough (like 18) and can make the choice himself. Why do you think permanent non-needed physical changes should are ok on babies?
/r/MensRights10/04/19 11:33 AM
1

I have a multitude of sources which say otherwise, the BOP, DOJ, and FBI all say your number is wrong. I just wanted the prove of your number, not argue if that number is right. Funny how you want an apology for asking you sources, is something wrong with you?
/r/MensRights10/07/18 01:56 PM
3

He has no sources, 99,9995% that he is only getting what his name implies or is one of the 0,0005% a troll who just wants to undermine MensRight. 0,0005% that he will get more than what his name implies in his life. (It does not seems that he wants to argue here or hold a conversation, otherwise he would have given us his sources and not been such a prick)
/r/MensRights09/07/18 02:55 PM
3

I am neither left nor on his/her side. You made a claim and did not cite your simple number but you wanted the sources of somebody who argued with you. That is why i want the link. So that everyone will know if you are some incel retard who comes here to undermine MensRights or if you want to have a conversation here. Read your comment again and you tell me which one you think you are. ;D
/r/MensRights09/07/18 02:37 PM
3

I have to side with BertyLohan, even through i don't support her initial argument. My number came from FBI, DOJ, and BOP stats, plus more from AU. Just about the same % in both countries. That is not a citation. Otherwise i could claim anything and say i have it from "FBI, DOJ, and BOP stats". What BertyLohan wants i probably a simple link to at least one of these sites that refer to the number in question. To clearify i mean a link to a study of the FBI, DOJ or BOP and not their homepage.
/r/MensRights09/07/18 08:46 AM
4

I did read these comments, why is it hateful to trans people if men want the same protections and rights as transgenders?
/r/MensRights19/04/18 05:34 PM
12

First, most people in MRA don't have anything against Trans men or women. The second people will get a very favourable outcome because of their belief, sex or gender, that is a problem. That has nothing to do with Transphobia. being trans as profitable is pretty terrible considering how many trans people are killed every year I will ignore the profitable part, since i said something about it above. Do you know how many transgender died last year? "25" out of around 1.4 million. I am not sure if …
/r/MensRights19/04/18 05:29 PM
2

That is a very long and very aggressive response to his comment. I know that you are very upset about his comment, but attacking people like that will just make them ignore you and your cause. I think it would have been enough to say "Sadly it is impossible for prison inmates to sue easily, since the us prison system is made to silence inmates and make it incredibly hard to sue anyone" But if you know a way to change this system (which is really really broken) then advertise it so that we can he…
/r/MensRights19/04/18 04:07 PM
9

The complainant, who 9news.com.au is not naming to avoid identifying her daughter, supplied the following statement yesterday. Nobody would harass her daughter (perhaps a bit bullied in school), that is just an poor excuse to protect the complainants reputation.
/r/MensRights17/04/18 09:51 AM
1

Not useless, but a bit strange.(i did neither up nor downvote because of that) I used to say that... But recently I've started thinking about the harm. With that it seems to say that other people do not look at the consequences for women who falsely accuse, which definitely is not true in this sub. Also you never mentioned the "harm". Then (i mean to say, can we agree in society to grade them?) Could be answered with a yes. Rape is in many cases worse, but that was never the question. Everyone i…
/r/MensRights16/04/18 03:23 PM
4

Definitly not the same prison length. But what about being publicly mentioned (like the accused) and put on a list like sexual offenders so that she needs to inform people of what she did (To potential partners etc.) In fact, having read so many young girls statements where they talk about their false accusation, I believe most of them are being taught that what they did was wrong. That may be true, but many other criminals are also "taught that what they did was wrong", so why should they be tr…
/r/MensRights16/04/18 12:47 PM
1

Ohh i missed that for some reason. After re-reading your comment i must admit that you are of course completely right.
/r/MensRights05/04/18 07:45 AM
1

Not true. I would say that depends on the school ThogOfWars commented on this.
/r/MensRights04/04/18 04:07 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter