TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Seventh_Planet Archive

View 1 posts and 151 comments by Seventh_Planet on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

ProgressSeventh_Planet/r/MensRights05/05/26 03:50 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Yes, we all are evil. Women can also be evil. We are condemned to freedom and everyday we can freely choose between good and evil.
/r/MensRights24/07/26 05:05 PM
0

Psychopaths exist. Media has the power to funnel the destructive force of psychopathy in a certain direction. What I mean by "defeat in front of patriarchy" I could also have said: admitting defeat that educating your child not to be a psychpath or sociopath is impossible. That parents and other adults can have no positive influence on a child. It's a kind of refusal to do that kind of care work.
/r/MensRights23/07/26 01:16 PM
1

Opinions on what unborn human life deserves are changing in time and place. They can't have a voice of their own and thus need other humans to raise their voice for them. You are doing your part in this. I do mine.
/r/MensRights23/07/26 08:55 AM
1

You can write down a sentence. A sentence that is missing a subject and a verb in its main clause. You can talk about the relationship between men and sexual crimes. You can write down the sentence "It's all men do." and mean that men don't take time for eating and sleeping out of their day, because they are 24/7 occupied with committing sexual crimes. "It's all men do." is clearly hyperbole and not a majority opinion of men. You can talk about the ratio of men and people with the attribute male…
/r/MensRights22/07/26 08:43 PM
-1

In this gender-reveal-party economy?
/r/MensRights22/07/26 05:37 AM
-30

It would be the medical practitioners.
/r/MensRights22/07/26 05:36 AM
-12

There's still cloister or lesbianism left as an option for a life of not dealing with men.
/r/MensRights22/07/26 05:36 AM
2

Not every man that is involved with making a woman pregnant can be a cuck. At least one of them has to be involved in the tedious task of impregnating the woman while the rest can watch and masturbate. Or how do you mean that cuck word if not literally?
/r/MensRights22/07/26 05:34 AM
-5

Better put the sperm on a leash so that you can retract it when things don't go the way you want. Your body, your choice... But is your sperm part of your body still? Is it really?
/r/MensRights22/07/26 05:31 AM
4

I must correct what I said earlier. Yes, there is always a mother. But this doesn't mean, mothers should be entitled to their children. These women must see Berthold Brecht "The Good Person of Szechwan": A woman is a very good person and tries to help all the people around her. But she also needs money and she has to marry someone and then can't be a witness against her husband anymore and she gets pregnant and now must ready herself as a mother of a future pilot and make the world beneficial fo…
/r/MensRights22/07/26 05:25 AM
1

Progress is: The fish is. In-fighting and victimhood olympiad is: How much is the fish?
/r/MensRights21/07/26 05:22 AM
53

"Never in a lesbian relationship." is a false statement.
/r/MensRights20/07/26 06:07 PM
1

Yes, that's how we (speaking for feminists, not for men's rights activists) use it. There's a reason, societal progress first needs scientific progress, i.e. an increase in our knowledge base. There's a saying in Latin: MATER SEMPER EST. Meaning: You can always be sure about the person giving birth to a child. Mothers have the right to their child. Who in their right mind would deny it to them? But for fathers to receive rights to their own children — for example birth-rights for title and inher…
/r/MensRights19/07/26 06:27 AM
2

If you are a high performer as a man, you have to tone it down or you'll be labeled as an asshole or annoying. That's just good business in any field of work. If you deliver too much for too little pay, you are damaging the prices for everyone. Yes like every worker you want to work hard and give an excellent experience for your customers. But that's what gets exploited within the system. If you increase your output, you set up the higher standards for everyone. So that everyone must work harder…
/r/MensRights18/07/26 09:59 PM
0

I try to talk with my feminist friends about the question of romance and love. And how both men and women suffer under patriarchy. On this point, they agree with me. Men are profiting under patriarchy and therefore don't see much reason to change that system that mostly benefits them. On this point, men's rights disagrees with me. By saying counter-arguments like patriarchy doesn't exist. Women don't only suffer under patriarchy, but they also behave in ways that further and stabilise this syste…
/r/MensRights18/07/26 09:43 PM
1

I use the word "circle" so that I don't have to define it any further. *Does not elaborate.*
/r/MensRights16/07/26 02:58 PM
1

Femicide is a word that's being used in the context of killing humans who were in a loving relationship that for some reason required faithfulness from both partners. Women and men who are susceptible to the ideology of romance and who would jump through every hoop and go every mile out of their way in order to keep up that patriarchical ideal of the monogamous, faithful, loving relationship don't want to hear about killings in same-sex relationships. If the lesbian woman who was betrayed by her…
/r/MensRights16/07/26 05:33 AM
0

Lots of people have second jobs. Some have third jobs. Could they maybe take some time out of their day and make joining a union their fourth job? When the workers struggle for better payments, then more can stay within the family and we can all be a bit nicer to eachother.
/r/MensRights16/07/26 04:45 AM
1

Comes in, interrupts my explaining something to other people who are listening to me. I point this out and try to continue with my explanations. "Why are you interrupting me?"
/r/MensRights13/07/26 09:58 PM
6

Do you live in a country that has a central bank? Do you live in a country that has a parliament that can pass a budget and a finance ministry ordering the central bank to transfer money to accounts in commercial banks? Do you live in a country where the judiciary in form of prosecutors and judges and the executive in form of police and people that buy ankle monitors from the free market or from special government controlled producers are using money from that budget to pay for these judges, pol…
/r/MensRights11/07/26 09:37 PM
1

Thanks for the recommendation! In 2024, the platform was reported to have leaked potentially highly confidential data from the "knowledge base" module of over a thousand corporate users due to a misconfiguration of its access control settings.[13] So, as long as you configure its access control settings correctly and as long as you're ok with the US government having access to your data, you are fine. My workplace is more about freeware, so we use GitLab (wiki) and OpenProject (along word docume…
/r/MensRights09/07/26 01:09 AM
1

I like Knowledge Article and Knowledge Base. We should have that at my workplace. Looks like you have that kind of stuff really systematically so that in general every user could read up on the topic before opening a ticket. Do you know some tools that can accomplish this?
/r/MensRights08/07/26 08:13 PM
-2

No fault divorce exists. What are you talking about?
/r/MensRights06/07/26 07:51 PM
-1

Hete is a slur. When a homosexual man is talking to another man and they become disappointed that they aren't also homo- or bisexual, they could call them hete as in heterosexual. Or used to talk in general about heterosexual men. It's the same as using homo as a standalone word. Heterosexual and homosexual are adjectives. The same way cisgender and transgender are adjectives. Using adjectives as nouns very often turns them into a slur. We're all men fighting for men's rights, right? Whose right…
/r/MensRights30/06/26 07:12 AM
-10

straight men I'm sorry: Do you mean trans men that are attracted to women or do you mean cis men that are attracted to women? But you probably mean both. No need to make a difference every time.
/r/MensRights30/06/26 06:55 AM
-13

Please stay on one topic. Either focus on the goal of going on a walk undisturbed by groups of women or focus on what you are supposed to do to find love. Get better on your ragebait next time.
/r/MensRights09/06/26 10:00 AM
10

There are male heroes, and then there are team efforts.
/r/MensRights08/06/26 02:15 PM
3

Or they still get compliments. But these compliments from women are as useless as the compliments women get from men.
/r/MensRights06/06/26 02:38 PM
2

You're right. Between Hayek and Keynes there's still so much they don't know. That's why Post-Keynesianism exists. It matters which macro economists gets listened to. As long as it's not someone who only thinks in microeconomic terms. Maybe I was even wrong to put all the behaviour economists in the same bag as all the micro economists. Keynes himself talked about "animal spirits". Moral hazard by bailing out banks and failing businesses is a big problem and a valid criticism of Keynesianism.
/r/MensRights05/06/26 02:54 PM
0

Not all economists are behavioural economists. Some (like e.g. Keynes) are macro economists.
/r/MensRights05/06/26 10:18 AM
2

if you wanted to depopulate the Earth High population means more labour supply means lower wages. Low population means lower labour supply means enormous efforts in culture and propaganda to keep labour from realising their bargaining power is needed for it to still be lower wages. Nope, there is no way the elites would allow for higher wages.
/r/MensRights05/06/26 10:03 AM
1

Could you please point towards the rubbish bin where we are supposed to throw away the losing countries in your competition between countries? "Oh I guess running isn't for me." is something an unsuccessful athlete could say. "Oh I guess being part of the global economy and free trade isn't for me." is something we for some reason don't like countries to decide for themselves, because tariffs are bad.
/r/MensRights01/06/26 08:22 PM
2

The French are more productive than the Germans.
/r/MensRights01/06/26 08:16 PM
1

There are such things as rules and customs. For example faithfulness inside marriage or the prohibition of prostitution. In the past, these rules were enforced much more strictly than today. For example landlords were not allowed to rent out an appartment to a male human and a female human who were not married. Also: Women can live together with a man in a harmonic marriage with equal duties on both sides. If society doesn't provide all humans with enough work outside the house then it looks hur…
/r/MensRights09/05/26 09:51 AM
5

Also: has everyone forgotten that the word incel was first used by one of these female humans to refer to themselves?
/r/MensRights08/05/26 08:05 PM
1

Are the United States of America under the control of US Americans right now? Is Germany under the control of Germans right now? Is Russia under the control of Russians right now? You are beginning to question the excuse of "national security" Go further than that, and you are beginning to question the nation state as a whole.
/r/MensRights25/04/26 05:18 PM
1

Further evidence that most humans are not sociopaths that want to fight with a gun in their hands. Or maybe not, I don't know much about the average Swiss woman. I heard, private gun ownership in total is rather high in Switzerland, but mostly because of male draft and that they can take their gun home with them after their time served. But that's only something I read somewhere. Also, progressive laws are coming only slowly to Switzerland, I heard. That includes women's rights.
/r/MensRights25/04/26 04:39 PM
1

And in 2015 there existed a functioning state on territories in Iraq and Syria called "Islamic State". It doesn't matter if it was supported by other majority muslim states in the middle east. On its territory, it had an army of more than 30.000 fighters. Part of a functioning state is an army, and that includes recruitment methods. Nothing of that is okay. From the viewpoint of the state, everything of that is legal. And other than the terrorist groups Irgun, Lehi, Haganah, the Islamic State di…
/r/MensRights25/04/26 03:30 PM
4

You are correct. Once the workers take up their arms and fight in the class war, even after overthrowing the capitalist class and establishing a socialist state ruled by the working class, they are still surrounded by capitalist states with their armies who want to crush the communist movement, invade their country and re-establish capitalism. So of course yes, a state (socialist or not) with an army during war times tends to engage in conscription.
/r/MensRights25/04/26 07:48 AM
6

This is anti-war propaganda. The method of forced conscription is universal for every state in need of an army. The outcry against this (in principle and not because it isn't also targeting women) is universally human.
/r/MensRights25/04/26 07:38 AM
2

This is MensRights, not YoungPeoplesRights. No, but you are right. We feel more sympathy for young men than old men. Just like the general public feels more sympathy for women than men. But I hope more and more people understand that it was never about Russia vs Ukraine, men vs women or young vs old.
/r/MensRights25/04/26 07:28 AM
5

Ok. Now look one level deeper: What are the conditions that could have forced these men to be in the military and carry out these orders to kidnap that other man?
/r/MensRights25/04/26 07:23 AM
2

Ukraine is a functioning state. They enforce laws for this kind of forced conscription. So as far as the Ukrainian state is concerned, this is not an illegal kidnapping. Civilians interfering in such a kidnapping would be stopped by the police. Just like in any other state, interference in the actions of the state will be stopped and punished by the police.
/r/MensRights25/04/26 07:12 AM
5

You don't have the power to enforce this rule. Once you have the power to enforce this rule, you have the power to stop wars from happening in the first place. But right now, you don't have the power. But you can fight for that power. But it won't be a fight one nation state against another.
/r/MensRights25/04/26 07:01 AM
4

You are right to feel pity for that man. You being in this world and still having your humanity to feel this way proves that the world is still worth living in.
/r/MensRights25/04/26 06:57 AM
-16

Good for them. Good for everyone who likes fucking. But why would we need a war for this?
/r/MensRights25/04/26 06:50 AM
0

RIP many many things that die and get destroyed in a war.
/r/MensRights25/04/26 06:48 AM
4

Some women in Germany are fighting against the draft. It's not only young men who could be conscripted that are out on the street protesting against the reestablishment of the Wehrpflicht. But you are correct: Most women that are currently living in Germany can choose not to fight. This fact alone doesn't make them sociopaths.
/r/MensRights25/04/26 06:43 AM
2

Every worker has a will to live. No one wants to fight and die in a war between two nation states. This is not the war that should be fought. Some feminists have the freedom to choose against fighting in this war. This useless war. But this doesn't mean feminists don't fight. They are privileged in that they can choose not to fight at all or to fight against the system that gives them these privileges or against other systems of oppression and exploitation. It's possible for a feminist not to fi…
/r/MensRights25/04/26 06:35 AM
4

War is horrible. I don't understand how any worker would volunteer to fight in a war of one nation state against another nation state. This is not the war we should be fighting.
/r/MensRights25/04/26 06:05 AM
7

Could all be true, yes. But you've got to start somewhere. And I think it's rather difficult to go on strike without a union backing you up. Unless you aren't really serious about going on strike.
/r/MensRights10/04/26 03:54 PM
4

Join a union. Talk to the people there. Then join in your first strike. Then get disappointed in low wage increases, because there's still too few organized in a union.
/r/MensRights10/04/26 01:53 PM
10

What "the president" are you talking about?
/r/MensRights23/09/25 05:50 AM
-3

It's sad that more people are killed or imprisoned overall. Is this statistic checked for the effect of maybe in a situation where a state government could either take people as prisoners or kill them, they maybe lean toward killing men and imprisoning the women than the other way around? Or is it some kind of saturation effect, in that in 2000 there were way more males imprisoned than women, and somehow the trend became towards more towards equality but still more new male imprisoned than femal…
/r/MensRights18/05/25 05:26 PM
4

You could start by winning back union workers.
/r/MensRights09/02/25 08:04 PM
1

It also has to do with paid vs unpaid work: When wages for cleaners were raised, more men went into that career, because they could raise a family on the wage. So it's not that womenly things are beneath them for men, more like men who only make low wages in such womenly careers are beneath many women.
/r/MensRights07/02/25 02:37 AM
3

Loser who sits around all day instead of working as a (electrician|soldier|firefighter) yeah, he's not getting the sex. Damn, I must become a hard working useful member of society so that women respect me and I get the sex.
/r/MensRights25/01/25 01:40 PM
1

Just because someone calls it 'woman tax' and justifies it as some compensation for the physical struggles women go through every month and more, doesn't make it something new. Women who marry a husband that can pay for her beauty treatments is nothing new. 'It makes me kind of sad and I can't help think about how tied to capitalism that is, because there's just so much money to be made and convincing women they need to be doing these beauty treatments on a two- to six-week basis just to keep up…
/r/MensRights19/01/25 09:06 PM
1

Let's take my two examples again. Say the second example is of a archaic society where there is only one kind of punishment (death penalty) and almost everything you could do is a crime. 100.000 men and 100.000 women. 100.000, i.e. 50% receive the death penalty. 98500 and 1500 women. That's 98,5% men. Then life gets better and we are in the situation of the first country, where there are many different kinds of punishment, and maybe the same number of crime happens, but only a small fraction is …
/r/MensRights31/08/24 01:08 PM
-1

I already wrote my reply to this comment here.
/r/MensRights31/08/24 11:01 AM
2

If there was a 98.5% chance that women would be victims of state violence This 98.5% is a different percentage than the 98.5% in the OP. Since the OP only talks about execution and death penalty, I assume by being "victims of state violence" you mean being executed after receiving the death penalty. Otherwise we are conflating death with getting a bloody nose in a police confrontation. Let's say there's a country with 100.000 men and 100.000 women. In that country since 1977 only 200 people have…
/r/MensRights31/08/24 11:00 AM
1

Slavery is bad actually. If the slaves are doing productive work that could also be done by enterprises who hire workers in the free market and pays those workers living wages, then those enterprises will fail to compete against slave wages.
/r/MensRights31/08/24 10:06 AM
4

This percentage is not important. Let's say the US were a democracy where more than two parties could be voted for. And let's say all is going well, but the only relevant topic for this election right now were this percentage. There are 6 parties to choose from: Party A: We will keep this percentage at 98.5%. Party B: We will change this percentage to be only 80%. Party C: We will change this percentage to be only 60%. Party D: We will change this percentage to be 50%. Party E: We will change th…
/r/MensRights31/08/24 09:54 AM
-8

There was huge economic growth in the Soviet Union bringing them from an agrarian country right to winning most disciplines in the space race and ending famines. But having that one big communist country in the world was in the end not good for the communist movements in the world. For example you mentioned Pol Pot, and Cambodia was only one of the examples of developing countries that had to fight for independence from Western European colonizers and for this adopted some version of socialism j…
/r/MensRights10/08/24 07:15 AM
5

I think trying to run a business and subjecting it to progressive thoughts like gender equality doesn't work in the dating world, since the genders are unequal in the dating world. So the contradiction begins with trying to treat it as a market while still hanging on to ideologies like romantic love.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 08:23 PM
-4

Her fault and every men's fault who slept with her.
/r/MensRights24/07/24 06:28 PM
1

Getting married to a woman is a choice.
/r/MensRights24/07/24 06:26 PM
2

Rape ... Murder ... Hard or easy to define? As broad as possible or as narrow? And all of that without looking like a hypocrite... Not an easy task.
/r/MensRights20/07/24 05:34 AM
1

Where else would a person come from than from having a consciousness and being aware of their self-awareness?
/r/MensRights20/07/24 05:31 AM
0

Names.
/r/MensRights20/07/24 05:29 AM
4

Like with St. Patrick's Battalion. So if you find yourself part of a conquering army, you could still change sides.
/r/MensRights16/06/24 05:08 PM
0

Women don't want men of the same age, because they see them as immature, so women fall in love with older men. This trend continues even after divorce. So come retirement age, the man is 64 and maybe wants to have his happy retirement together with his wife. So there are regulations that allow early retirement for the wife at 58.
/r/MensRights10/03/24 08:55 PM
0

There are children that have no parents, because both parents are dead. Those children are called orphans. There are children that have only one parent, because the other parent has died. And then there are children that have both parents and both parents are still alive. In which category would a father not choosing parenthood (financially) fall? Does the child have 1 alive parent or 2 alive parents?
/r/MensRights17/12/23 04:30 AM
1

Yeah, maybe cars, trucks, tanks and rifles are not the category of products that need much more different sizes. With medicine products on the other hand there can be many individual differences. I don't know more examples than what I glimpsed from the headlines in OP, but I think it's more of a you see it when you see it kinda thing, that you would maybe hear from an occupation or hobby that's popular in men gets interest from women, and they find all the equipment is made for men, and then the…
/r/MensRights22/08/23 07:44 PM
1

Since they are mentioning the medical field explicitly and I also had it in mind after reading for example #3 of OP: One such product category could be medicine. As in, it used to be that medical products would only be tested on men and then the data extrapolated for their effect in the female body. I don't know for sure how much of a problem this was in the past and how it is getting better. Thanks for ansering my question What is stopping men from pursuing those service sector jobs that they d…
/r/MensRights22/08/23 07:22 PM
1

adapted to suit both the 5th percentile woman and 95th percentile man I don't know what that means statistically. Are you saying, there are a wide range of differently sized products so that both the 5th percentile woman and the 95th percentile man can choose what's right for them? Or are you saying the opposite, that to save designing and production costs, things get made as one-size-fits-all with it fitting smaller women better would make it more uncomfortable for men? If the second option, th…
/r/MensRights22/08/23 07:15 PM
1

Men suffer from receiving services provided mostly by women from a woman's point of view. Women suffer from using goods designed by men from a man's point of view. We need more services provided by men from a man's point of view. We need more goods designed for women from a woman's point of view. What is stopping men from pursuing those service sector jobs that they demand be more filled with people with a man's point of view in mind? What is stopping women from pursuing those science and indust…
/r/MensRights21/08/23 11:39 PM
4

Oh sorry, I don't know anything about being gender fluid.
/r/MensRights13/08/23 07:32 AM
11

But how will you stop being a woman after those five minutes are over? Wouldn't you want to stay a woman forever?
/r/MensRights13/08/23 07:08 AM
-19

I haven't read "To Kill a Mockingbird", but maybe I should. I have read one feminist who adresses false rape accusations against men and especially against black men (and also mentions Emmet Till): Amia Srinivasan’s "The Right to Sex" THE CONSPIRACY AGAINST MEN The National Registry of Exonerations, which lists the men and women wrongly imprisoned in the US since 1989, does not detail the long history of false rape accusations against black men which bypassed the legal system altogether. In part…
/r/MensRights29/04/23 07:44 PM
2

Please note that the German government consisting of Social Democrats (SPD), Greens (Bündnis 90 die Grünen) and Liberal party (FDP), had other things in mind about this law. But Germany is a federal republic and next to the Bundestag (where the coalition of Social Democrats, Greens and Liberal party have a majority) this law also needed approval of the Bundesrat (the 16 federal states) where the conservative party (the CDU, i.e. the party of Angela Merkel for the last 16 years) has a veto minori…
/r/MensRights29/04/23 07:03 PM
2

So I'm doing my part by going to work in heels?
/r/MensRights03/04/23 08:48 PM
0

I can see how men might convince themselves that their feelings of emotional desperation is personal weakness as opposed to a symptom they're all experiencing from White Imperialism. You all can try to read the whole text and leave out this sentence with the "White Imperialism". It would still have its merit. You can take the whole text including that sentence but only leave out "White Imperialism" and try to fill in the blank, coming up with another sensible explanation: I can see how men might…
/r/MensRights27/12/22 11:39 PM
10

You are right. There are cases where it would be cruel and unreasonable to demand child support from the father. For example in cases where the father was raped by the mother. Especially in cases of statutory rape. I don't know how the law is in these cases.
/r/MensRights20/12/22 08:09 PM
-8

Not all child support laws are going to be erased from the books forever. Are you against abortions? Are you indifferent towards abortions? Are you somewhat in favor of abortions?
/r/MensRights20/12/22 07:43 PM
5

Without the distinction between cis and trans people, the concepts gay, lesbian and straight seem easy to understand. Gay: Homosexual - men's edition Lesbian: Homosexual - woman's edition The perspective of who says that is clear. Men loving men. Women loving women. Straight is already more complicated. Straight: Heterosexual - men's edition Straight: Heterosexual - women's edition depending on who says they are straight, it can be men loving women or women loving men. Now if we take into accoun…
/r/MensRights15/12/22 08:28 PM
0

I hang around some bisexual subreddits. It's much more friendly towards men. Regarding being attracted to men as some kind of curse is not well received there.
/r/MensRights27/11/22 11:33 PM
-3

It is art. We are discussing it. It's working as intended. Also I want to address a pet-peave of mine: The notion that the government should only spend money on art if the art is nice and happy and doesn't upset anyone. And the idea that somehow paying non-compliant artists less money somehow makes that money suddenly available for all the good and helpful youth projects we were totally going to finance, if only the evil artists didn't suck up all that money for themselves. The government has gi…
/r/MensRights15/08/22 05:43 AM
10

but as a straight man I would feel a bit out of place given it's a venue for people of a particular sexuality that I'm not part of. I would feel awkward for making it more difficult for them to indulge in that sexuality without constantly running into guys that aren't interested in other guys. As an asexual heteroromantic man I felt the same last night. My first thought was, asexuals are part of the LGBTQA+ community, so a gay bar would be the right place to be. But it hurt my heart, declining t…
/r/MensRights03/08/22 06:10 PM
-2

Well, isn't that trans exclusionary? Or do you mean it in a way that trans women can also be subject to the same kind of discrimination as cis men, for example when they had a child before transitioning? And is having a Y chromosome necessary for being a man? If so, there's no wonder I never read about trans men here on /r/MensRights.
/r/MensRights01/08/22 03:50 AM
0

Do what? Sing their lovely songs while being creatures of the sea and when men understand that as some kind of invitation and cast aside all carefulness and then crash with their ship and drown, it's somehow the sirens' fault? Maybe they just want to sing.
/r/MensRights30/07/22 01:35 AM
3

There are subs that automatically ban you when you post comments in another sub which is on their list. Those kinds of subs want to save themselves the trouble to wait until someone posts something ban-worthy and just decide beforehand that posting in one of those subs that they will never be a good fit for their sub. Sometimes another sub with a similar name but true in front of it will be made which doesn't have this auto-ban feature. Then both subs exist more or less independently from each o…
/r/MensRights07/05/22 09:57 PM
1

You mean because he said he is a feminist? I found the other mod reply explained it very well: This subreddit is called "Ask Feminists," not "Ask Reddit" or "Ask Anyone with an Opinion About Feminism." People come here specifically seeking the opinions of feminists; therefore, it holds that only feminists have the right of direct reply. Non-feminists may participate in nested comments, provided they do not break any other sub rules. I mean, that's the purpose of Ask... specific subreddits. That …
/r/MensRights13/04/22 09:40 PM
1

Turn off as in "I right now don't find you attractive and the situation itself isn't very sexy when you are crying" or "Since you cried last wednesday I will never find you sexy ever again"?
/r/MensRights12/01/22 10:23 AM
5

This is not just a problem about random strangers having opinions about men with their children. It's about cops having no clue about what's legal or not and thinking they could just take away children from their parents if they want to. Why do cops listen to random strangers when no crime has actually happened?
/r/MensRights07/11/21 10:33 AM
0

The image doesn't load. Use a better image hoster next time please.
/r/MensRights13/10/21 07:36 AM
-11

That's what happens when you are building car-dependend neighborhoods, when it's too dangerous to walk home outside by yourself. If they were living in a city with frequent buses or subway stations there would be no problem of walking home alone. When women feel unsafe with a group of men nearby, it's neither the woman's nor the men's fault, but the fault of the infrastructure we have built. Ask what can be changed. Not the existence of men outside in a group or of women wanting to walk home alo…
/r/MensRights27/09/21 02:57 PM
1

On this topic, I can recommend this 2013 article My bad sex wasn't rape. Most points are still valid today.
/r/MensRights24/05/21 10:28 AM
-2

I don't know what this has to do in this sub. Women being successful or unsuccessful in the porn industry doesn't really concern me. Or is it this sub's name taken too literally? Women try something which isn't inheritently bad, and then fail, is it really having todo with pussypass denied?
/r/PussyPassDenied17/01/21 12:02 PM
1

And both statistics aren't what you would want to change, unless you think being a woman or being a man is an inherently bad thing.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/01/21 05:36 PM
2

The scrolling on that page is very irritating.
/r/MensRights10/10/20 10:46 AM
1

Then why did China succeed?
/r/MensRights05/06/20 12:01 PM
1

Well, there we have the answer to "What if it was your son?" WTF indeed.
/r/MensRights12/05/20 09:05 PM
6

Oh, that's terrible! We must do something about this! One in four are women! That's really bad news. How could we change that for the better, please tell me. Anything but that. Is there something we can do for those 1 in 4 so that they stop being women? It's such a terrible fate, I wouldn't want for anyone! /s What do you mean, it's not the woman part that's wrong? Well then stop publishing bullshit statistics! "p% of X is Y" is always assumed to mean that X is a group in the general public, and…
/r/MensRights03/02/20 05:51 AM
5

Including witholding her name. This should be a standard for any and all journalistic reporting on crime. If you hate reading the full name of a man accused of rape or a similar crime in the news, then don't condemn them when they are withholding the full name. What good does it do to the reader knowing that person's full name? I don't know what the reporting restrictions on a convict's name are in australia.
/r/MensRights25/11/19 09:32 PM
-6

Does he talk to all his corpses like that? It's rude to expect a dead person to drop the weapon it's still holding in hand. Oh, she was still alive but lying on the floor wounded? Then why don't you hurry and give first aid?
/r/PussyPassDenied09/11/19 07:13 AM
0

I am ok with a sign that would insult people using the toilet in the way indicated by the right red circle. But I don't like using animal as an insult to humans. They are still people. Uncivilized, messy, dirty people, but still people.
/r/MensRights06/11/19 07:58 PM
3

It's a problem that X% of something bad are women. Hey let's change that for the better! We did it! Now only X-1 % of that bad thing are women. Good on us for making the world a better place! Oh it's not the distribution of x% women and 100-x % men are affected by that bad thing that is the problem? And changing x by increasing or decreasing it doesn't change a thing in how many people are affected by that bad thing? Then stop using statistics like that! Yes, I totally support you! 19% is still …
/r/MensRights05/11/19 02:58 PM
2

Says who? Men who need this need to be more vocal and demonstrate their need for such services. They didn't just pop into existence for women, they were fought for. The same can be expected of men.
/r/MensRights26/08/19 08:23 PM
4

or typo and he meant 'were' as in 'were destroyed', i.e. passive.
/r/MensRights06/07/19 09:07 PM
3

They're EDEKA. Ende Der Karriere. It's already the end of their carreer.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 01:45 PM
15

A pet owner is not a parent. A dad is not a mother. A mother is not a dad. My dad is not a phone. Duh!
/r/PussyPassDenied30/03/19 11:12 AM
1

http://www.ibash.de/zitat_31.html
/r/PussyPassDenied09/03/19 11:36 AM
2

Factors of 42
/r/MensRights27/02/19 05:06 AM
1

I think she lost her fawn.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/01/19 10:37 PM
5

Access denied for me.
/r/MensRights05/12/18 11:26 AM
1

The solution to this "problem" is communication. "Can you move your bag/jacket please? I'd like to sit there."
/r/MensRights08/11/18 12:34 AM
1

The statistics "75% of suicides are men" can be misleading. That just means: Probability of being male given that you commited suicide = 75% = P(M | S) What is it that we actually want? We don't want to make the ratio to be 50%, but we want to acknowledge that given that 75% of suicides are men, our measures directed towards men directly, and not towards men and women equally, can decrease the total number of suicides and by this the relevant statistics Probability of commiting suicide (S) given…
/r/MensRights10/09/18 05:23 PM
6

It doesn't look like Trump is going to change it back any time soon, does it?
/r/MensRights28/07/18 08:53 AM
3

It is beneficial for a tans person to take hormones at an early age. During puberty, they are already changing into another person, so why not let them change into the kind of person they really are? They don't want to live through puberty knowing they will become a man, when instead they feel like they should become a woman. I don't know how the medical procedure is today, to determine that a child full knowingly and willingly wants to change its gender. But if we can assume their wish, why not…
/r/MensRights04/10/17 05:10 AM
2

We should establish that any tale with the words "regret" and "later" in it can't be about rape.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/09/17 11:34 PM
2

Is this what they call "nice guys" = entitled men who insult the woman, when she says no? Oh wait, it's the other way around here.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/08/17 09:24 AM
210

Christopher Nolan should be intelligent enough to ignore such requests.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 09:24 AM
-6

No, it's just a very old repost. In the OP, I think the site was really as shown here. And after a rightful outcry, they changed it so it looks like you cited now.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 05:44 PM
8

There are automoderators on some subs, that scan a set of other "bad" subreddits and see it, when one member in their own sub posts a comment or submits a link there. For using reddit and freely engaging in other unrelated subreddits, those users are autobanned from that sub, most times with no chance of parole.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/06/17 10:30 PM
1

Are internet points for businesses so important that they talk back to customers online to shame them into a good review? What is a "1" rating among a sea of better values? And if they are all bad, well that could be the businesses's fault.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/06/17 11:31 AM
1

It's not uterme. It's uterus.
/r/MensRights05/05/17 08:14 PM
6

Is this again to do with university intern investigations? Why would anyone suspected of a crime ever accept a case be handled by campus police? Where does their authority come from? Are people in the US so afraid from the real police, that they let university handle such cases instead? Campus police is a big mystery to me. Anyone cares to explain it to me please? Thank you.
/r/MensRights19/11/16 06:27 AM
-21

Ok then if it is a lie, it's a pretty obvious lie in that everyone can see if you are wearing makeup. So it is not really hiding the truth.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/08/16 11:35 AM
-32

Of course she is ridiculous to say all men lie all the time, but saying makeup is a form of lying is just as ridiculous. What exactly is the lie in wearing makeup?
/r/PussyPassDenied30/08/16 11:27 AM
7

If yo think about it, it's absurd that we condemn Islam for its parallel society and their peace judges and their parallel justice system that doesn't report to the police; and we have the same happening at university campuses.
/r/MensRights28/08/16 10:08 AM
6

Which of these cases is more likely? a) a boy to a lesbian couple is raised as a boy, and wants to be a boy, lives his life as a man. b) a boy to a lesbian couple is raised as a boy, wants to be a girl, because deep inside him he doesn't feel right as a boy, has to endure puberty of a boy, his body becoming more and more strange to him, then maybe in his late twenties he decides to get a transition to become a female, and lives better and a happier live afterwards. c) a boy to a lesbian couple i…
/r/MensRights24/07/16 10:44 PM
8

And better hurry with it, as long as the UK is subjected to the EU court.
/r/MensRights19/07/16 11:18 PM
0

What is this "Dear Colleague" bullshit you are talking about?
/r/MensRights19/07/16 11:14 PM
23

the man, who cannot be named for legal reasons But they sure would name him, if they could.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/04/16 07:10 PM
2

I don't think having an argument (even if you are outnumbered) is considered mobbing. I thought it was a strategy of feminists to consider opposition as "mobbing" so I think we should abstain from using it in the same way. This is of course assuming you were not actually mobbed. If you were, I'm sorry and you can ignore me.
/r/MensRights11/10/15 06:10 PM
2

And nothing will change because of his death. It will have no positive effect on how society will deal with false accusations. There will be no clamor about this tragic death that was so preventable, if only we changed how rape accusations were dealt with.
/r/MensRights09/10/15 06:15 PM
2

"Individual" with a dividing line between a pictogram of a man and one of a woman.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 05:43 PM
1

Thanks. Didn't know that. And it makes sense from a powerlevel point of view. If the girl is charged with rape and then threatens her boyfriend into consenting after the fact. Yeah, that would be a broken system. Not saying this one isn't broken already, but who do I have to tell in this sub?
/r/PussyPass13/09/15 07:31 PM
-9

And if the girl gave consent after the fact? Like the man did in this case? Of course, the male would be charged with rape right away (which didn't happen with the woman here), but a girl can just as well say it wasn't rape after the fact.
/r/PussyPass13/09/15 02:26 PM
1

Don't worry. She knew he was already dead, so she wasn't going against the no-contact order. /s
/r/MensRights31/05/15 03:51 PM
2

"War on Women" is the most ridiculous "War on _" I've ever heard. And they are all ridiculous.
/r/MensRights20/04/15 02:12 PM
39

Taking a honeymoon is like like the opposite of working. Having a personal life beside the job is one thing. Going on a honeymoon and leaving work unfinished quite another. Edit: To answer the questions about me having a job: No, I did not. And I have no idea how it is having to plan your vacation and still have work to do and all the things people need to be responsible for. But I'm going to sooner or later, so thanks for warning me.
/r/PussyPass13/03/15 07:44 PM
1

At least CGPGrey's video has a disclaimer at the start of the video warning you that, if you ever learn about the concept of jury nullification, you are not legally eligible to be in a jury.
/r/MensRights05/03/15 02:36 AM
3

Marriage is a financial decision ruled by stategic thinking. It's just natural that some think more about strategy and play "to win". For men of course: "The only winning move is not to play."
/r/MensRights25/02/15 08:05 AM
1

Der Blick ist frei.
/r/MensRights15/01/15 01:56 AM
5

This sign is more telling about the person bringing it up than about men.
/r/MensRights11/01/15 05:46 PM
1

I'm a long time reader of both your print and online additions, and a person has never had any connection with fraternities. -> I'm a long time reader of both your print and online additions, and a person who has never had any connection with fraternities.
/r/MensRights29/09/14 05:51 PM
29

I'm imagining this for the second experiment.
/r/seduction11/04/14 04:39 PM
1

I wonder how the graph will look, if you remove the "Met Online" option and divide the rest of the percentages, because it looks like online dating has caused all other reasons to decline, so the diversion between those interests me.
/r/seduction01/07/13 03:40 PM
8

I read it as Why You Have No Friends (reddit.com) But seriously, a good read and sound advice.
/r/seduction18/04/13 12:22 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter