TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Sgt_Sweetness Archive

View 0 posts and 40 comments by Sgt_Sweetness on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

A motion to reject a jury's decision, is for numerous valid reasons. Typically you see a judge presiding over the case be the one to override a jury's decision. But the defendant may also file an appeal. The reasons vary, but it could be anything from: jury tampering, undisclosed information about a juror which might have made them less then impartial, or the jury doing other crazy stuff, like having sex with one another. But what this woman did was the wrong kind if appeal. Which wouldn't have …
/r/PussyPassDenied25/12/15 04:48 PM
3

Just a few points to make about this: So biased against the father its pathetic. No journalistic standard here at all. Really weak arguments against the Husband. Screw the Today show. This isn't news that he had a blog dissing his ex-wife. The real news here was that a judge overstepped her bounds and denied a citizen his first constitutional right.
/r/MensRights10/08/11 04:54 AM
22

Family Courts have far too much power. I think they need to be a lot more strict against judges who infringe upon a person's Constitutional rights. I hear about judges who do this sort of thing, but they still keep their job. Also if this blog was truly detrimental to the children in some capacity (mental or emotional health?). Then why did the ex-wife blab about it to the judge and show up on TV. Seriously, WTF lady?
/r/MensRights09/08/11 10:16 PM
2

Not the bartender's fault that the cooks were lazy bastards; although I have a feeling this had more to do with corporate upper management than some 19 year old cook. Left a nice tip for the waitress and told her to find a new job quick.
/r/MensRights07/08/11 11:48 PM
2

Yep, especially if its one of those chain restaurants like Ruby Tuesdays and what not. No offense to those guys but they are their to make food that is good, but as fast as possible. On the inverse I once ordered a rare steak from one of those places and cut in to the steak only to find it frozen in the middle. I told the waitress to take it back and give me a bill for my drink, because I wasn't going to eat another thing there.
/r/MensRights07/08/11 09:06 PM
2

Those poor men. I weep for their sorrow.
/r/MensRights07/08/11 09:03 PM
2

No, but try it rare next time you order. The whole point is that the more you cook it the worse the steak gets. The taste starts to fade and the steak takes on a really tough texture. Some people find eating a rare steak for the first time to be a bit too bloody, but you will get over it quick. The taste is just wonderful. Just make sure you go to a place that takes their steaks seriously. If the steak is cold in the middle than they aren't doing their job.
/r/MensRights07/08/11 09:01 PM
2

True stuff. The steak restaurants I go to will refuse to cook it higher than medium well; and even then its stretching it. The one I go to is nice enough to where they will send out a cook who explains why its better to go rare; even though it explains in on the menu.
/r/MensRights07/08/11 04:59 PM
1

Good point sir. I have the answer I was looking for.
/r/MensRights06/08/11 07:15 PM
1

That's why I said that they needed to make more than one girls team. If their is just one other team than it technically satisfies the requirements. Although I believe just creating the one team is enough to satisfy the requirements of Title IX. Not a lawyer though, so I could be wrong. Still that is a superficial to the main argument that I am making; which upon, why isn't their more direct evidence going either way. The paper making an article where upon it has no evidence seems like a bad dec…
/r/MensRights06/08/11 06:55 PM
4

So were they discriminated against or were they just not good enough? I ask because the article doesn't provide any evidence either way. It didn't show what their performance was like out on the mat. Which is what it comes down to. Yes they did decline female athletes several times, but that is irrelevant when compared to the main argument; were the girls good enough to make the team. Also going with the Title IX argument. Why didn't they create an all women's wrestling team? That would have sat…
/r/MensRights06/08/11 05:45 PM
2

Read the entire post, I say that this is my own opinion and anecdotal evidence.
/r/MensRights25/07/11 10:07 PM
2

.
/r/MensRights25/07/11 09:57 PM
2

.
/r/MensRights25/07/11 09:44 PM
0

+
/r/MensRights25/07/11 09:43 PM
19

If I recall correctly, the decision is from the DOE (Department of Education) which is separate from the DOJ (Department of Justice). Thus in the eyes of the DOE he is guilty to them. Now why they won't go back and fix this is absolutely wrong and without merit. He has proven his innocence to the point that the accuser is being sought by the police for lying. Supposedly this is a DOE loophole that allows them to be a dick to Caleb Warner, while not doing anything illegal. Personally I would just…
/r/MensRights19/07/11 07:25 PM
7

Agreed. At first they were angry at that woman, but then they just let that drop. It was sickening to watch. Also this is not a stellar group of women there. Also watch the comment one girl makes at 8:46 which says the same thing you mentioned: It is a little bit sexist, like if someone cut a woman's breast off no one would be sitting around laughing. The room fell dead silent for a few seconds their until another girl made a joke and then it was back to fantasy land. Also I hope they charge thi…
/r/MensRights16/07/11 06:20 PM
6

The entire DA's office and police department failed on that case. The defense nailed down its key point: their just wasn't any evidence their to convict her beyond a reasonable doubt. It could have been Her, or her parents or even the boyfriend that killed that little girl. Hell it really could have been an accident and a cover up (albeit partying afterwords is some cold blooded shit). The police should have investigated more, and talked to a lot more people. That family lies far too much. The D…
/r/MensRights06/07/11 05:42 PM
1

Thanks for the reply. I believe that to be quite the most amicable situation between two people, and not lying about it certainly is the honorable thing to do. Good on you dude.
/r/MensRights28/06/11 04:18 PM
2

You sir are a role model. If I might ask, did you outright tell your ex-wives that you didn't want kids, or did you have to deal with it later on? I ask because I was in one relationship where the woman wanted to have a kid and waited until a year after we were dating before telling me that was her highest wish (after a platinum ring). It did not turn out well.
/r/MensRights27/06/11 04:23 PM
2

Same stuff with Wally World. They just send the ugly, and fat, ones to do the grunt work. Mostly because a ton of managers are just lechers and would hit on the pretty cashiers all the time. That and fuck them behind their wives backs. I was always nice to the girls I work with, but they just couldn't lift as much as me. Still I can't blame them. Men and women are just physically (and biologically) different. Women can do a split and I can lift 50 more pounds than they can. The one thing I hated…
/r/MensRights25/06/11 02:30 AM
0

I'm sorry I thought this was a rational discussion where we would not pull a quote out of context. The insinuation, wait check that I plainly said earlier in my comment: that Wally world promotes people just based on popularity alone. Which they are allowed to do. No shit they can't be sexist and yes recording them would mean you could file a suit against them. Although the waivers they have you sign means that they can then sue the shit out of you and you can't take that to trial because their …
/r/MensRights25/06/11 02:22 AM
21

Just had to stop by and clear some stuff up for people who don't know much about how Wally world works. First, it is fairly sexist over at retail hell. But it goes both ways. For instance they won't send women to do a "mans job". Meaning women almost never do carts or load up cars with furniture or any other job that calls for heavy lifting. By that same nature they almost always place women in the clothes section, or in the food court, or at a register. Women are the only ones ever qualified fo…
/r/MensRights24/06/11 01:31 PM
1

Maybe, but prosecutors today seem way more interested in a high conviction rate and showing the public that they are "tough on crime". This includes some judges too. The overzealous court system screws people over all the time. Oh wait did we accidentally send another person to jail? Nope just ignore the facts.
/r/MensRights18/06/11 01:20 AM
3

It's the same thing in the eyes of the law. Even if you do it by accident, you still did it. That is if they catch you anyways. I was just citing how they would go about prosecuting him. "Ignorance" in law just means not knowing. So if you didn't know you were recording and/or you didn't know it was illegal, you can still be prosecuted under the law. Also it isn't a minimal charge or recording someone. You would also be breaking medical privacy laws too and that is some serious stuff there.
/r/MensRights13/06/11 10:26 PM
2

Ignorance of the law excuses no one. Seriously though, even if he says its a mistake doesn't mean he won't face criminal or civil charges.
/r/MensRights13/06/11 10:08 PM
2

Children Services Fail. CPS should have never have let that woman or anyone in her family, near that child. How she managed to get the child back is just surreal.
/r/MensRights08/06/11 11:41 AM
19

District Attorney made a deal, not much of a surprise there. The DA dropped the attempted murder charge too. Now from what it sounds like she might be a mail order bride, so she might be sent out of the country in a week or so. Which I hope is the case, because if she is simply branded as a criminal in our country and sent back to wherever she came from that is a hell of a lot better than the taxpayers paying for her to stay in country.
/r/MensRights02/06/11 06:27 PM
6

I have to disagree with you a bit. The entire point of the trains is for women who don't want to be groped. Namely in Japan and India. Also the train car restrictions are usually during rush hours only, and only on weekdays. To be fair Japan and India push people in to those trains like sardines during rush hours. It's better or worse depending on where you board at. So just imagine being trapped between a bunch of people you don't know and you can't move. Also Japan (and to a lesser extent Indi…
/r/MensRights30/05/11 04:38 PM
2

Well feminist ideals would go along the lines of equal rights for women: Those were more clear back in the day; right to vote, right to have an abortion, right to own land. This was some real shit. This progressed further along with time. Right to file rape charges against a man (and it been taken seriously). Being discriminated against getting a job for being a woman and glass ceilings. The problem occurs now that women have the same rights as men, but the still fight for more rights. So now th…
/r/MensRights29/05/11 03:13 PM
6

That right there, is not feminism, not even a side ways attempt at feminism. It's just a woman who wants a man who does everything for her and lets her do everything. She wants a big strong man, who will be her bitch at a moments call. I could not find a single thing that she said that could be thought as being feminist in any way, short of the man asking her to pay the bill. Also this is a blog, not to be mean to the submitter, but she is a nobody. Hell she might as well be a troll for all we k…
/r/MensRights29/05/11 02:38 PM
1

I have never needed a survey to tell me that. Thanks for doing the leg work anyway, now men have something to cite to.
/r/MensRights27/05/11 03:01 AM
1

Oh snap, for a minute their I thought she had raped a special needs kid. Still, what she did was fucked up and 90 days is ridiculous. On the plus side that is 10 years of probation and if she even does one little fuck up, she is back in prison. Also she can never teach anywhere ever again and she would be hard up to find a job with her record now. Not even bagging groceries. Not to mention the laws stating where she can live, she probably has to move out of her apartment she lives in now. If any…
/r/MensRights27/05/11 02:58 AM
2

Not only is that weird, and creepy; its nasty as well. I have known only one woman that had bad periods. Not PMS just plain old physical pain. Something about her bits and pieces down their caused her a lot of pain, I shall spare you the details. But she would have to straight up excuse herself for 6 hours and just lie down in pain. I think she is the closest a woman can be to knowing what being kicked in the balls feels like. Funny enough all the other girls shut the hell up when she walked in …
/r/MensRights27/05/11 02:51 AM
3

Came here to say the same thing, now if we get a better source; then I am more likely to listen in on this. Also just playing devil's advocate here, but what does this have to do with r/mensrights ? Yes she is a horrible person and deserves to be shamed out of her community forever, but I don't see where she has damaged any man's rights. Yes she destroyed her marriage and cheated on her husband in second to worst way possible. Probably fucking her kids up too because children services had to hol…
/r/MensRights26/05/11 03:22 PM
9

Looks like Somebody lost the staring contest and had to get all mad and get the cops involved. But seriously, I hope this dude sues the government for this BS and wins a load of money for it. I don't know the extent of what the woman did to get this man fined and jailed, or her involvement in such; but that is just incredulous.
/r/MensRights24/05/11 10:25 PM
10

If she is interested in wanting to have sex, but not up to it; that could mean a variety of problems. Not trying to blame her, but here is my advice. Ask her to go to her OBGYN. Not having sex after having a child is not uncommon. It hasn't been uncommon for a long time. Her doctor should do some tests and ask some questions. If she comes back and says that the doctor did nothing, but tell your wife, "this often happens." She needs to find a new Doctor. Lazy, wait and see doctors get people kill…
/r/MensRights20/05/11 06:54 PM
1

I guessing as much from the video, otherwise it looks like he would have just left the house. It could have been the woman's brother or other relative. Now I for one wouldn't have hit this woman, but that's because I try not to hit anyone if possible. It's a whole lot better to merely put someone in a choke hold, or pin them to the ground. You don't hurt them (leave bruises) , thus saving you some trouble with the police; and you have a chance to get them to calm down. Honestly though she should…
/r/MensRights19/05/11 01:02 AM
1

It reminds me of the stuff I had to deal with in retail. In big box retail giants you have these rare, but ultimately awesome jobs that open up in a store. They are rare, but they are awesome. Nice hours, easy work, and good pay. Not to mention they are usually no brainers. The only way to get these jobs is to be the managers friend or be a woman. In retail the men must do all the heavy lifting and those types of jobs. This is perpetual BS to me. Sure some jobs make more sense to have a woman do…
/r/MensRights13/05/11 03:48 AM
1

Most women abhor the thought of a man having control over their body and forcing them to have an abortion. While at the same time ignoring congress which every so often tries to ban abortion altogether. weird. I know the system is setup for the best interest of the child and that a woman has absolute control over her body. Hell I wouldn't want anyone else passing judgements and having control over my nuts. What gets me is that having a child becomes this financial burden on the man and that the …
/r/MensRights13/05/11 03:38 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter