TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Shadezyy Archive

View 0 posts and 104 comments by Shadezyy on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

The data was showing how early abortions typically are. One of the arguments against the Texas law was that it was too early of a cutoff and the data shows it is not that early of a cutoff. The earliest time listed was 9 weeks. Now, a three week difference doesn't seem like a lot, but when it's a 2/3 of the time, I think that would be important to have in the data. I understand this was done before the Texas law, so 6 weeks didn't really hold significance. But I would be curious know actually ha…
/r/MensRights23/09/21 05:00 AM
1

For your second part, in your example if you are seen buying a gun then you still couldn't be sued. It would be the establishment that sold you the gun liable to a lawsuit. That's not how I understood it, or how I was explained it. It is also ridiculous to think that an out of state hospital/clinic that performs an abortion can be sued by a different state's government? Which doesn't even do the suing. So I don't believe this. If you go by heartbeat or by the ability to feel pain, it's earlier t…
/r/MensRights22/09/21 07:20 PM
0

I can see you are just trolling now and I fell for it, have a good day!
/r/MensRights22/09/21 07:03 PM
1

But Roe v Wade also split it up by trimesters, I understand later that that was updated to "fetal viability" but I don't understand how only some parts of Roe v Wade, or the subsequent ruling, can be considered a right and some other parts can't. The argument I heard how they got around it was by not making it illegal, but essentially having the punishment be dealt by the people in civil suits (in the form of these $10k bounties). This is because the government itself isn't saying that a women c…
/r/MensRights22/09/21 04:04 PM
1

By that logic, if it's not explicitly stated in the constitution, then why are they not able to just outright ban it?
/r/MensRights22/09/21 03:10 PM
0

Exactly, but there is a process to these things, and every so many years the Supreme Court goes back and looks at this stuff and supposedly updates rulings? (this is something that I just heard from a lawyer and have no knowledge about or what the process is or anything). But this bill obviously violates that first trimester stipulation. The only way they were able to get around it is that the government body in Texas doesn't actually punish the people that get abortions after six weeks, it just…
/r/MensRights22/09/21 02:47 PM
0

"In January 1973, the Supreme Court issued a 7–2 decision ruling that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution provides a "right to privacy" that protects a pregnant woman's right to choose whether or not to have an abortion. But it also ruled that this right is not absolute, and must be balanced against the government's interests in protecting women's health and protecting prenatal life.[4][5] The Court resolved this balancing test by tying state regulation of…
/r/MensRights22/09/21 02:24 PM
0

Just going to point out that I'm not conservative and I support this bill. I assumed as such considering how offended you got when you thought I called you that. Anyway, you have to admit you are not in the majority, and you know it. It's insane how upset women get when they are treated like men are... Just lol at this. And just in case you misinterpret this as well, I'm laughing at how stupid this sentence is. Yeah... it's crazy how feminist women all the sudden don't want to be treated like me…
/r/MensRights22/09/21 02:03 PM
0

Excessive? Depends on your purview doesn't it? That's exactly what I fucking said lol You make the mistake of thinking the MRM is conservative. Never did I make that assumption. I do think the majority of people in support of this bill are conservative though. Or are you gonna sarcastically say I'm wrong about that too? However, I am happy that women are a little bit closer to equal reproductive rights with men. You are just spiteful and naive then. This bill only harms both sides. Sure, it harm…
/r/MensRights22/09/21 12:57 PM
-1

Yeah, it left with the arbitrary "without excessive government restriction". Which is very open to interpretation. I understand your point though, that's why I said "circumnavigate" and not "break". But wouldn't any reasonable person consider (this is a separate point, but it matters for the excessive bit) slowly getting rid of/defunding planned parenthoods, 6 weeks abortion limit, and community bounty hunting excessive? Why not just wait to overturn the law and then do it? Doing this stuff is j…
/r/MensRights22/09/21 03:53 AM
-1

"In January 1973, the Supreme Court issued a 7–2 decision ruling that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution provides a "right to privacy" that protects a pregnant woman's right to choose whether or not to have an abortion." That part.
/r/MensRights22/09/21 02:15 AM
-4

The fourteenth amendment
/r/MensRights21/09/21 07:09 PM
-1

I mean, regardless of your stance on abortion, how they circumnavigated the constitution is sketchy as hell. And also paying bounties for people to report aiding an abortion (a constitutional right), is crazy.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 04:35 PM
-3

The law is legit unconstitutional though. Whether or not you agree with Roe v Wade doesn't matter, it's the law. If you don't like it, repeal it. But don't just ignore it.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 04:34 PM
-2

They have no consistent standards because "Feminism" isn't one person. Just like people on this sub disagree all the time. Post like these are so pointless.
/r/MensRights30/07/21 12:59 PM
1

I read the page linked, and I couldn't find any place where gender was specified? I can't see how defining consent more thoroughly is a bad thing.
/r/MensRights23/04/21 03:25 AM
1

Oh please, most lawyers are now women pushing the “progressive” and feminist agenda. Did you not read the guy I replied to's comment?
/r/MensRights21/04/21 01:19 AM
-3

Sounds about right
/r/MensRights20/04/21 11:13 PM
-12

I'm from the US, and the numbers are around 64% men, 36% women. https://www.mycase.com/blog/2019/08/aba-2019-report-lawyer-demographics-earnings-tech-choices-and-more/#:~:text=64%25%20of%20lawyers%20are%20men,77%25%20of%20the%20U.S.%20population. https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/administrative/market_research/national-lawyer-population-demographics-2010-2020.pdf https://www.statista.com/statistics/1086790/share-lawyers-united-states-gender/
/r/MensRights20/04/21 11:07 PM
-8

Literally the first article on Google says most lawyers are men. 64% to 36%.
/r/MensRights20/04/21 10:41 PM
28

I dunno, Republicans have proven that anyone can be tricked into voting against their own interests.
/r/MensRights20/04/21 10:37 PM
2

Voted out about 3 months ago now
/r/MensRights08/04/21 04:48 AM
-5

He voted for Biden, not Trump.
/r/MensRights07/04/21 04:51 AM
-5

While I like Chris Rock and this is a funny bit, it's not true for the most part in today's society. Parents don't conditionally love their children in most cases. Wives don't conditionally love their husbands in most cases. If your wife loves you on the condition you provide for her and everyone in your family, she doesn't love you. Gold diggers and sugar daddies like another commenter brought up are a perfect example. I don't think many people will look at that and call it love.
/r/MensRights05/04/21 03:23 PM
5

You're grasping with that one lol Care to try again?
/r/MensRights21/11/20 05:20 AM
12

And trump is the reason most Americans voted Biden.
/r/MensRights21/11/20 01:18 AM
1

Isn't that literally what everyone does? It's bad, yeah, but not unique to any one group.
/r/MensRights22/01/20 09:27 AM
19

Building strawmen is never a good thing and only makes nobody want to take you seriously.
/r/MensRights27/11/19 07:40 AM
5

Even women's birth control pill has a failure rate. I'm assuming men's would too?
/r/MensRights04/11/19 06:51 AM
6

Im from the states, and call me ignorant, but haven't the laws around rape changed a lot over the past years? Like, not defining it as penetration anymore.
/r/MensRights02/11/19 02:41 AM
1

And do you think the crowd shouldn't intervene and she actually deserves to die? That was the point of my comment, not whether the guy had the right to fight back or not. Jesus, does no one actually read comments before replying on reddit anymore? Also, what kind of logic is that? Self defense, by law, allows you to use reasonable force to take someone out if you feel threatened. Knocking her unconscious would probably classify as self defense, but you mean to say if after she falls unconscious,…
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/19 05:19 PM
0

You didn't read my comment, even before the edit. I didn't have any problem with the punches after she came back, I didn't really have any problem with her being pinned against a wall. But you can't call that a fight at that point anymore, and bystanders should and seemingly did intervene. If a man vs man fight was going this badly for one guy, I think bystanders should and would intervene.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/19 05:13 PM
0

She was pinned against a god damn wall.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/19 05:08 PM
13

It looks to me like no one stepped in when she hit him, and when he first fought back, no one stepped in either. When he kept going with her back against the wall people finally stepped in. Seems fair to me, it stopped becoming self defense. Edit: People seem to be misunderstanding me for some reason. If someone is pinned against a wall being wailed on, it is not a fight anymore, it is a beating. Are these the same type of people that think it's okay for police officers to keep bashing people on…
/r/PussyPassDenied09/09/19 05:29 PM
4

Yeah, now. I was talking about what he would be thinking while it was happening. You think if he fought back it would've been uploaded the same way it is now? No, it either wouldn't be uploaded at all, or edited to only show him hitting her.
/r/MensRights03/09/19 05:17 AM
11

Yeah, after the fact. We might've seen a completely different clip on publicfreakout or, god forbid, 2x if he actually fought back.
/r/MensRights02/09/19 05:47 PM
18

Seemed like it's filmed by someone she knows. There is no way it wouldn't be edited or "lost" when it came time to defend himself in court.
/r/MensRights02/09/19 04:29 PM
2

From what I read, he hasn't provided it in court yet. He's talked about preparing it for use in the trial now, but this is for a defamation lawsuit and not whether he actually did the crime or not.
/r/MensRights01/09/19 04:27 PM
23

He was never actually charged with anything so that doesn't matter. The public opinion of someone has never been innocent until proven guilty.
/r/MensRights01/09/19 05:29 AM
1

You know, I would actually like to see more women in computer science/engineering fields. This is the lazy, ultimately harmful for women and men way to do it.
/r/MensRights30/08/19 04:08 PM
2

What would benefit men then? I feel like talking about anyone's problems would be beneficial regardless of gender
/r/MensRights27/08/19 03:52 AM
2

I see all these comments about imaginary people complaining about this sub being full of incels, and I'm just annoyed by the "which is your disability?"
/r/PussyPassDenied26/08/19 10:33 PM
6

It turned into that a long time ago lol
/r/PussyPassDenied26/08/19 10:31 PM
0

Why spend 1x the money on women and 3.5x the money on men when you could just spend all the money on preventing both?
/r/MensRights26/08/19 10:24 PM
1

Obviously not.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/08/19 07:49 PM
-1

I think they're mentioned here. The data I was referencing came from a really long comment with lots of other data that popped up around the time this issue started. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/no-it-isnt-sexist-that-womens-world-cup-teams-dont-get-equal-pay https://resources.fifa.com/image/upload/financial-and-governance-report-2015-2770871.pdf?cloudid=asmgcqptmszlmj5quozr Also, I want to say I don't know the first thing about soccer. I don't know if placing top 16 is good, I don…
/r/MensRights30/07/19 05:00 PM
0

I've seen data that includes 2018 and 2014, so I don't know what you're talking about with the limiting data range thing. Including sponsorship data individually would be hard, but I assume men would get substantially more if only because the world cup generates so much more viewership. however, The US men's team has done so poorly in its history that the fact that almost no one will likely see their sponsor will definitely play a huge roll in how much money they get from said sponsor. Also, the…
/r/MensRights30/07/19 04:16 PM
2

I posted this somewhere else here, but, why does skill level suddenly matter when someone is arguing FOR women? We should stick to the argument that the more profit you generate and the more popular your side, the more money you should make.
/r/MensRights30/07/19 03:49 PM
1

I posted this somewhere else here, but, why does skill level suddenly matter when someone is arguing FOR women? We should stick to the argument that the more profit you generate and the more popular your side, the more money you should make. You can use skill level to determine what's more entertaining, sure. Point being, women's soccer in the US generates more money than men's soccer in the US.
/r/MensRights30/07/19 03:48 PM
-7

Women's soccer brings in more money than men's soccer in the US.
/r/MensRights30/07/19 03:41 PM
1

I don't know which side you're trying to argue, but no one is complaining about prize pool money.
/r/MensRights30/07/19 03:38 PM
-2

You're using international numbers for a national problem. I don't know how these got tossed around, whether someone being an idiot or trying to push their own agenda, but the women's US team brings in more money than the men's US team.
/r/MensRights30/07/19 03:36 PM
3

I'm confused what your arguing. No one is complaining about prize money and definitely no one is complaining about international stuff. This is all purely US centric. And I don't get what you mean by there being no gendered teams because, in almost every sport, there are.
/r/MensRights30/07/19 03:33 PM
-1

Not trying to be that guy, but why does performance suddenly not stand as an argument when the women are better? I see the repost all the time on this sub about how the women's team lost to some high school boys, and the top comment is always "this is why they get paid less hur". Anyway, the main reason people are complaining is because they do actually generate more income and still get paid less. it gets complicated with the yearly salary that women get and men don't. And I guess all the benef…
/r/MensRights30/07/19 03:28 PM
1

Women get a yearly salary, as well as per game. Men just get paid per game. I don't know about the numbers, but I wouldn't call money "per game" necessarily performance unless they get more when they win.
/r/MensRights30/07/19 03:20 PM
1

I mean, she's a terrible human being, but the only reason this is getting upvotes is because everyone hates this "trend", and it's new. This isn't ppd. No one is saying to go easy on her cuz she's a girl, but she still gets fucked. She isn't trying to use her gender as a shield. She's just getting fucked for being a piece of human trash. Deserved? Yes. ppd? Not even fucking close.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/07/19 03:47 PM
1

I believe they changed the wording of rape in the US. I think that also affected the legality of it? I'm not entirely sure, but my limited searching seems to also reflect that.
/r/MensRights25/07/19 03:13 PM
2

This is some r/comedyhomicide shit right here.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/07/19 07:03 PM
1

No, what you said was that they don't fight for men to get equal pay at tennis, which wouldn't be fair if they did because the men bring in less money so they should get paid less. That'd be like being mad at someone that was 10 years at a company not fighting to get the new employee a higher salary than them. Anyway, I'm assuming you don't have any sources to back up your claims or else you would have said them when I cited conflicting info. Don't make MRAs look bad just because you have to com…
/r/MensRights11/07/19 11:07 PM
-1

Why though? That wouldn't be equal. Women's tennis is more popular, thus bringing in more money, which correlates to women being paid more. Also, where are you finding data on women being paid more than men? I tried searching it and all I'm finding are how men are paid more, even when women bring in more money overall. Albeit, they've only looking at prize money, so if there is anything like a yearly pay, it wouldn't be counted from what I've looked at. https://www.theguardian.com/sport/ng-inter…
/r/MensRights11/07/19 09:53 PM
-5

Why get mad about them not complaining about something that makes sense?
/r/MensRights11/07/19 03:43 PM
0

Isn't women's tennis more popular than men's though?
/r/MensRights11/07/19 03:29 PM
1

According to what another guy in this thread said, which he backed up with sources, the women had about 700 million viewers. That's roughly 1/5, like I said.
/r/MensRights11/07/19 05:37 AM
0

No joke, I'd actually love to see all gender tennis. I may be ignorant as hell, but out of all the sports I know, besides like golf, it seems the most gender neutral fair.
/r/MensRights09/07/19 12:58 AM
1

Am I understanding correctly that the women's world cup generated only $73 million, almost 1/4 of that from the US alone, while having about 1/5 the total viewership of the men's world cup in 2018? Sounds like FIFA is taking some horrendously bad ad deals.
/r/MensRights09/07/19 12:54 AM
1

Not really on topic, but what middle schooler is 15 years old?
/r/MensRights09/07/19 12:23 AM
1

It's really easy to focus on specific facts about this and ignore other ones in order to argue your point. I could just say that the prize money for the men's side was $400 million while the women's was $30 million even when generating about 1/5 of the viewership. That right there would make it look unfair to women, but I'm not looking at other facts such as sponsorship deals, how the money is distributed to the teams, etc. (viewership numbers from another user on this post, prize money amount w…
/r/MensRights09/07/19 12:13 AM
3

It's pretty much just a man hate sub/feel good about doing basic human goodness sub.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 03:11 PM
2

I'm not saying my beliefs, I'm saying what these people are probably concluding based on this information. At a quick glance it makes sense, and it makes for great article titles/headers because it seems unfair until you think about it more.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/06/19 05:54 PM
-3

I think it's that they have about 1/4 the viewers, but a lot less than 1/4 the pay.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/06/19 04:31 PM
1

Am I the only one who thinks that most of these don't sound bad?
/r/MensRights09/06/19 05:05 PM
3

So, monopolies are just good business? Hm, I guess technically that is true. I'm not trying to say monopolies are bad for a company, what kind of idiot do you think I am? Monopolies are every company's wet dream. But there's a reason they're "illegal." Monopolies are not good capitalism, that's just what every communist implementation turns into. Lobbying isn't bad in itself, lobbying is bad with the combination of donations that we have it set up with. The money politicians get is supposed to b…
/r/MensRights03/06/19 12:02 AM
8

Stop having blind faith in companies that don't care about their employees and only care about profit margins. Look at companies like comcast that have so much money they stopped Google fiber from rolling out so they can keep a monopoly on their subpar, overpriced internet. Look at the companies paying the FCC to repeal net neutrality. Look out how corrupt and lazy lobbying has gotten, to the point that they don't even try and hide the fact that politicians are getting paid off to pass laws that…
/r/MensRights02/06/19 06:22 PM
20

Because false insurance claims cost companies money, not individual people. And we all know laws are made to the benefit of companies.
/r/MensRights02/06/19 05:08 PM
3

While I agree with the article mostly, the commonly quoted wage gap statistic comes from pew research center who have written an article saying how they calculated their numbers (which was 85 cents to the dollar). They actually do account for hour discrepancies and part-time/full-time differences. They do not however account for like jobs, so I guess it's a moot point. I just personally like knowing all the info about both sides before I make a judgement. Article: https://www.pewresearch.org/fac…
/r/MensRights22/04/19 12:21 AM
-21

Are you about supporting men or just shitting on women? Most people here are incels, so yeah they just hate women. From my position, no one works harder to ensure the real and legitimate problems men face are laughed at and ignored as much as men's rights activists. Extremes of every group ruin it for the whole. Look at feminism, black lives matter, etc. You can downvote me in contempt, but I'm just a tourist who likely won't visit again. Saying stuff like this is childish and pointless. The equ…
/r/MensRights21/02/19 09:40 PM
1

Obviously. We have nothing to argue about here then.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/11/18 10:11 PM
1

You'd be surprised what being bought buy a gigantic company like amazon would do to change regulations and stuff your website would follow. Look at when they started actually caring about copyrighted music and whatnot. Just because you don't take taxes out from your employees paychecks doesn't mean you are breaking tax law? What lol. Youtubers are considered independent contractors and are subjected to doing all that themselves.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/11/18 09:44 PM
1

That must've changed once they got bought up by amazon. Do you know if that applies to just subscriptions though? Cuz I they would have no way to control that through donations or tips as they call them now. Edit: Also, I assume you would be exempt from paying US taxes if you are not a US resident. In no way does it say it'll get reported to the government of the country you reside in. Which still implies that you'd have to do all the taxes yourself if you are not a US resident. Still doesn't ap…
/r/PussyPassDenied25/11/18 09:35 PM
3

Why do you just assume this girl isn't paying taxes? There is nothing about this post that suggest this. That is what I'm complaining about. Just cuz she accepts payment directly (not sure if Instagram has some way to pay through their app) in no way implies that she isn't paying taxes.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/11/18 09:31 PM
1

I was under the impression you only get W-2s if the company you are working for is taking money from your paycheck in order to pay the taxes for you. Which I know for a fact twitch and YouTube don't.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/11/18 09:24 PM
2

By report income do you mean they just tell the IRS they are paying people? Because everyone that makes money from either site has to do taxes themselves because no money gets taken when they are paid.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/11/18 09:16 PM
2

What on earth makes you think I'm against people paying taxes? I'm against people making false claims based on biased suspicion or even just no proof at all.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/11/18 08:37 PM
2

lel
/r/PussyPassDenied25/11/18 08:34 PM
1

lol you remind me of "orange man bad" posts
/r/PussyPassDenied25/11/18 08:11 PM
2

So should we report everyone who earns money from YouTube then too? What about twitch? What about the hundreds/thousands of other ways people earn money online? If it takes 5 minutes per person reported and we report everyone who earns money in this manner then yes, it is a gigantic waste of time and money.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/11/18 08:11 PM
4

So we should report everyone to the IRS now if they don't openly claim they pay taxes? I don't think that's the point of reporting people and it wastes time and money to do so.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/11/18 07:52 PM
24

How does this person know she wasn't paying taxes though?
/r/PussyPassDenied25/11/18 07:28 PM
0

"They don't realize (or don't care) that they are breaking the rules." At least read his comment before replying back, god damn.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/11/18 12:59 AM
4

Am I missing something? One comment is talking about trans people and the other is talking about fat people. Is that the joke? All trans people are fat? I don't get it.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/11/18 04:45 PM
1

why is there a comma in the 378 comments but not in the 314 retweets?
/r/PussyPassDenied22/09/18 04:30 PM
1

Never said it was? Teaches to hate people with immutable traits though. Make sure you understand comments before you reply.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 08:20 PM
0

Sounds like a religion studies class to me. Next.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 07:37 PM
-1

Sorry if this sounds harsh, but why do you think you deserve special treatment by being allowed to skip a required class? My school requires a philosophy course to be taken, and even though I don't agree with a lot of what those old dead guys say, it's eye opening to learn about other people's opinions and views on the world. Some schools require a religion studies class to be taken and I would argue the same thing even though I don't follow any religions. Point being, don't think you deserve sp…
/r/MensRights16/09/18 05:13 PM
2

Were those articles written by this lady on twitter? What do they have to do with what he said at all?
/r/MensRights30/08/18 03:11 PM
1

I find them to be very different. User base might overlap a bit, but for the most part, people and posts here actually make sense. Everything that gets to the top of PPD makes no sense to what the sub is about and is usually just blatantly sexist (I'm assuming it started out showing women trying to get unfair treatment and it backfiring in some way, and now it's just a women tries/does something and fails and everyone is all "hrrdrr that bitch deserved it"). It's also impossible to have a conver…
/r/MensRights04/07/18 10:17 PM
2

I believe you're looking for r/pussypassdenied
/r/MensRights04/07/18 01:45 PM
0

Weird, I read the "I'm just a girl" the same as someone saying "he's just a boy." Pretty much saying that they are just a kid.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/05/18 04:44 PM
1

I kind of touched on it in my first comment. If we're talking waaay long ago then women were killed for being remotely smart at all. And especially being smart and outspoken. So mainly, they weren't allowed to. Well, if you think about it even a little you can figure it out pretty easily. I assume it came to be because a long time ago, physical power is all that really mattered at some point. For people to become leaders it would require fighting of some kind and women are generally weaker than …
/r/PussyPassDenied12/05/18 01:52 AM
1

I..don't? I don't really understand what you're trying to say with this comment.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/05/18 01:26 AM
-4

Hasn't it been proven/said profusely that IQ is a very bad way to actually measure someone's intelligence? Most of the tests only seem to ever reward logical thinking and not much else.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/05/18 12:40 AM
0

I'd say they're doing better now than they were 100+ years ago. It's not anywhere close to 50/50, though. But it's a lot higher than 0. Money actually plays a big part of it too. Lots, not all but lots, of these innovators come from very wealthy families that have made money from past successes and are able to funnel it to their children. There's also the stereotype? that the son has to take up their father's business and not the daughter. There's a lot to that goes into this and I think it woul…
/r/PussyPassDenied10/05/18 12:39 AM
1

I said twice in my post that I'm not saying anyone is smarter than the other. I specifically did that for people like you.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/05/18 12:26 AM
-12

I'm not saying any one sex is smarter than the other, but that justification isn't very fair to use. Women weren't allowed the same facilities as men throughout most of history. Some were even persecuted and/or killed for being "smart." Once again, I'm not trying to say women are smarter than men. Just that using that reason to say men are smarter than women is wrong.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/05/18 04:28 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter