TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ShadowMario01 Archive

View 1 post and 124 comments by ShadowMario01 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
28

Marriage/ChildrenShadowMario01/r/MensRights30/01/20 12:12 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

DON'T DATE ROBOTS!!!
/r/MensRights09/03/24 10:29 PM
23

Apes together strong
/r/MensRights29/02/24 07:17 AM
5

I totally get that if men are going to be required to enlist, then women should as well. But, and hear me out on this, what if there were no mandatory enlisting for the military? Having women be required to enlist just means dragging others down to make ourselves feel better, taking the rights of others away. Just scrap conscription all together.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 10:56 PM
7

Does this apply to human men too, or just deer men?
/r/MensRights25/05/21 02:32 AM
8

Speaking as someone who's been subbed for 3 years, this sub really enjoys its outrage/justice porn. This article is over 2 years old, and has been reposted multiple times.
/r/MensRights16/05/21 12:20 AM
1

BOTTOM TEXT
/r/MensRights11/06/20 09:04 PM
45

r/dontputyourdickinthat
/r/MensRights12/02/20 08:31 AM
7

My wife and I wouldn't be able to support a 3rd for a long time, at which point the age difference would be significant. By doing this I ensure no accidents that would damage our relationship or finances. The sex, when it happens, is still great. It'll be even better once the doctor confirms that my grapes are seedless.
/r/MensRights30/01/20 12:48 PM
2

I found Prince!
/r/MensRights02/01/20 01:19 AM
16

By God, you're right!
/r/MensRights01/01/20 09:12 PM
2

heheheheh, Weiner.
/r/MensRights01/11/19 08:56 AM
2

I'm pretty sure there was a South Park episode about this. Sexual Harassment Panda?
/r/MensRights18/09/19 03:51 AM
6

Finally, a level headed response. It's essentially a verbal contact, and he voided it, knowing the risks. Last paragraph from the article states there would have been other charges, but they were dropped for a lack of evidence. While Champagne said she did not disbelieve the woman’s testimony about forced oral sex and a second round of unprotected sex, the judge said the evidence had not reached the standard of proof for conviction on those allegations.
/r/MensRights05/07/19 11:33 AM
2

And so I cry sometimes while I'm lying in bed
/r/MensRights28/06/19 09:13 PM
6

I could've sworn there was a sub rule against low effort memes. Seems like the mods need to step up their game.
/r/MensRights26/02/19 01:03 AM
-1

r/unpopularopinions
/r/MensRights25/01/19 11:27 PM
45

Part of the reason is that a whole group should not be blamed for the acts of statistical anomalies. We don't blame all Muslims for terrorist attacks, we don't blame Blacks for gang violence. We don't blame women (and I can't stress that enough here) for children being taken from their fathers. Don't blame men for rapes. It removes responsibility from the individual. Blame the person, not their race or gender.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 03:42 AM
7

Time for a repost already?
/r/MensRights23/01/19 02:40 AM
7

"A miserable little pile of secrets!"
/r/MensRights17/01/19 04:56 PM
1

How did you all do? I scored 6/7. I religiously identify as Agnostic. I'm one away from being the SJW devil.
/r/MensRights24/12/18 08:41 PM
3

I'll assume the last one there is satire, but let's entertain the idea of it being genuine. Rejecting self preservation for some deluded sense of self sovereignty is the most idiotic thing I can think of. Right up there with refusing to get your kids vaccinated because you feel like you know better. It's rejecting life-saving advice for a chance to say "I was right". Granted, it only seems to be fringe feminists that would go this far, as most people have common sense, but the last thing anyone …
/r/MensRights29/09/18 06:34 AM
-5

ELI5, how is this Men's Rights related? Sounds more like a stupid rule in general. Men or women, people lost everything, including jobs, to Harvey. You'd figure there would be leniency to those impoverished.
/r/MensRights02/09/18 05:03 AM
2

Very true. That's why the become incels
/r/MensRights28/08/18 03:40 AM
-2

Intentional or not, this sounds kind of racist.
/r/MensRights28/08/18 03:39 AM
4

How long ago? Did they wind up having anymore kids?
/r/MensRights19/08/18 04:58 AM
25

On the plus side, at least all of the victims survived their injuries. No parent should ever have to go through their child's death.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 04:03 AM
-25

This is just feeding the outrage-boner this sub has become known for. It used to be a supportive and informative sub, but now it seems like the spillover from r/The_Donald and r/incels come here to spam and circlejerk their outrage-boners.
/r/MensRights17/08/18 01:13 AM
45

r/totallynotrobots
/r/MensRights29/07/18 11:01 PM
-1

Sometimes, I fear this sub is becoming a pointless circlejerk. Sort of like r/thanosdidnothingwrong now, but without any humor or creative content.
/r/MensRights22/07/18 04:45 AM
6

The national anthem was never originally written with "sons". It was added in 1914 in solidarity of the men going to fight in World War 1. The national anthem has been amended infrequently to change with the times. This has nothing to do with feminism.
/r/MensRights21/06/18 05:47 AM
2

Sir, I would gild you if I could. Regardless of position, you've done the work and present the best argument. I do believe you are correct, in that the odds of his innocence are small. Yet you do acknowledge the possibility.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 03:04 AM
1

Hopefully the mods will exercise their zero-tolerance for new accounts. Anyone this unreasonable has to be a troll.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 02:54 AM
1

u/IAMYOUREFLECTION I'm very sorry your topic was derailed by a troll. I've contacted the mods. Hopefully, his posts will at least be removed. I can't say I've followed the case very closely. Being Canadian, I'm more absorbed in local issues. But I can try and offer a nonpartisan stance. On one hand, a common tactic to securing major roles and a continued presence in Hollywood is to leverage sexuality, and I have no doubt that this was done in many cases. I don't believe those can be spun as assa…
/r/MensRights12/06/18 02:52 AM
1

Yeah, I'll take the high road on this one and check out. Before I do though, you should know this sub doesn't give any leniency to new accounts, and with how you've been behaving, consider yourself reported. Enjoy your night.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 02:46 AM
1

If you have to resort to personal attacks, consider your argument invalidated. Maintaining decorum and reasonability are the best ways to defend your point of view. Ad hominem attacks and belittling others positions weaken it. I want to make sure we're on the same page here, so I'll concisely tell you what my position is, and i encourage you to do the same. My position is that justice is blind, and we need to have faith that a court that high will serve proper justice. Our opinions do not matter…
/r/MensRights12/06/18 02:37 AM
1

Can't believe I have to quote myself. "I've generally despised the massive band-wagon gang-beating he's been getting, and I can't help but feel sympathy for him for everything that's happened based on accusations. That being said, he'll have his day in court. If he's found guilty, I'll have no sympathy. But the court of public opinion does not represent the law, and I'll let the person who's job is literally to do just that, be the judge." I'm cherry picking you because you are no different from…
/r/MensRights12/06/18 02:20 AM
1

That's a pretty convoluted way of telling me my assumption is correct. If any of them can prove he actually raped them beyond reasonable doubt, then yeah, he's guilty. But, they literally can't prove that. There is only one way this can go down IF the Justice System observes all of Harvey's Rights: NOT GUILTY. End of possibilities. So there's no way for them to prove he raped anyone, and the only way for a guilty verdict to be dealt is if he's had his rights violated. Like you said, "NOT GUILTY.…
/r/MensRights12/06/18 02:08 AM
5

Don't read this as me putting words in your mouth, I'm just asking. So in your opinion, there is no scenario in which he could be guilty without it being the fault of feminists/gender bias? EDIT : or, you know, instead of answering the question, downvoting works too. /s
/r/MensRights12/06/18 01:51 AM
1

I've generally despised the massive band-wagon gang-beating he's been getting, and I can't help but feel sympathy for him for everything that's happened based on accusations. That being said, he'll have his day in court. If he's found guilty, I'll have no sympathy. But the court of public opinion does not represent the law, and I'll let the person who's job is literally to do just that, be the judge.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 01:29 AM
15

Be realistic here. Trump would never use statistical facts in an argument.
/r/MensRights11/06/18 02:54 AM
57

A good time to be Scottish, then
/r/MensRights04/06/18 10:22 AM
1

Good bot
/r/MensRights28/05/18 02:11 AM
2

r/braincel detected
/r/MensRights28/05/18 02:05 AM
2

Reported.
/r/MensRights27/05/18 09:16 AM
19

Sorry you don't think highly of your mother. But that's no reason to brand all mothers as more abusive.
/r/MensRights14/05/18 05:34 AM
7

Again, a misleading title. Posts like this give the sub a bad name
/r/MensRights11/05/18 03:37 AM
45

https://syndication.bleacherreport.com/amp/1236558-college-world-series-features-wild-woman-running-on-field-grabbing-butts.amp.html You're pulling up a story from 2012 for circlejerk and upvotes? Seriously? This has been reposted to death. This is r/gaming bad.
/r/MensRights08/05/18 09:42 PM
10

Misleading title. No matter gender, she was challenged, each opponent had a fair shake at defeating her. But as it states, she was an expert duelist, defeating 10 opponents.
/r/MensRights08/05/18 09:36 PM
2

You speak some wonderful wisdom, and I'd be happy to add. Compare this sub to mainstream news (FOX doesn't count). While it is good to keep abreast of current events and how they relate to you, consistently indulging in sensationalist news can cause you to become paranoid, cynical, bitter. There needs to be a balance of information. We need to be informed, but it doesn't have to be all doom and gloom. Let's have some success stories. Some stories highlighting the enduring human spirit, the goodn…
/r/MensRights06/05/18 08:19 AM
3

Do you ever get the feeling that we're getting sabotaged by r/incels? Seriously, I'm seeing a lot more of these posts and comments since they closed.
/r/MensRights06/05/18 08:11 AM
1

I didn't think about that. Occam's Razor
/r/MensRights30/04/18 05:06 AM
9

There would have to be an overwhelming demand from male viewers. However, given that the majority of stay at home parents are mothers, the show was designed to appeal to women. And by virtue of that, I'd guess that less than 5% of their viewership is male. If, by some cruel twist of fate, a large enough percentage of the female viewership wanted a male co-host, despite good intentions, would result in any of 3 possible outcomes: Strawman/punching bag, Largely ignored or underutilized, Generic "h…
/r/MensRights29/04/18 08:52 PM
2

Your accusations of me being an incel are both baseless and unwarranted. When a major hate sun goes down, the news gets around. I was merely curious about what they did that got them shut down before r/The_Donald. Imagine my surprise when I found out what kind of people they were. I figured they were all trolls. I could easily call you an incel, since you are blindly accusing me of being one, perhaps to draw attention off of yourself. However, that would be a silly reason to make an accusation, …
/r/MensRights21/04/18 04:09 AM
1

Wow, I must be a really sneaky incel! I didn't even know I was one!
/r/MensRights21/04/18 01:23 AM
-2

It does explain the shift in tone here. There's only a few exceptions to "remember the human" for me. Incels is one. If you come across one posting their vitriol, don't hesitate to call them out for the human scum they are.
/r/MensRights20/04/18 07:05 PM
2

Aside from advocating suicide among it's own members and taking misogyny to an extreme, one post in particular took it way too far. Supposedly, OP was jealous of his "Chad" roommate having an attractive gf, and said he was considering castrating him in his sleep. The sub actually fed this, encouraging it. Apparently a couple users actually took the time to post medical procedures for castration, as well as suggesting that by injecting him with meth, he won't pass out from the pain. The whole sub…
/r/MensRights20/04/18 05:47 PM
-4

We probably also saw some migrants from r/incels after they had their sub closed.
/r/MensRights20/04/18 01:08 PM
-7

When was the news story posted? Do we know how old her son is? She could still face charges, and her son is/was living with relatives. CPS could still step in, especially if it made the news. Is there any update to this story? EDIT: She is facing child abuse charges, which could result in a loss of custody.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 04:47 AM
-14

So your response is a hypothetical situation with no real life example? Post a similar news story, genders flipped. Then we can discuss the disparity between law enforcement responses.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 04:07 AM
7

This isn't really Men's Rights, just shitty parenting
/r/MensRights19/04/18 12:09 AM
1

I would say the force he used was excessive. Proportionally speaking, he will have a few bruises, but she seemingly did little actual damage to him. Following what appeared to be a light strength, single hand push without drawing her elbow back, he dealth what looked like 3 haymakers, against someone half his size. Ignoring gender, that much force with that degree of difference in size will almost always result in massive head trauma, possible broken jaw, lost teeth. We don't even know what exac…
/r/MensRights12/04/18 06:38 AM
1

I think we need more information and context. We need to know exactly what happened between her last hit and his first. It looks to me like he tried embracing her, to show her love. She complied for a minute, then wanted space and kept him at arm's reach. The guy's swing was unprovoked. If he had swung directly following one of her attacks, then that would more easily apply as self defense. However, his attack was not done to defend himself. For a minute, he was in a rage, seemingly because she …
/r/MensRights12/04/18 06:23 AM
1

Here's hoping they get to play again soon. I'll be following this story.
/r/MensRights12/04/18 06:12 AM
31

On one hand, I kind of feel bad for the women joining the military if they were only accepted to boost the combat effectiveness of the men, perhaps through incompetence. On the other hand, this supports the biological differences of the genders, and why men are more capable for active military duty in combat. Regardless, I'm pretty sure posting without a source will get this removed.
/r/MensRights10/04/18 11:45 PM
6

This has literally nothing to do with r/mensrights. To me, this is fine. It's important for both partners to maintain healthy relationships outside of their marriage, and may actually help the marriage, by avoiding a feeling of being trapped, or claustrophobic. I spend a few hours with friends every week, apart from my wife, and I offer the same to her. We have our own identities outside of being husband and wife, as well as parents.
/r/MensRights08/04/18 09:30 PM
0

I'm detecting a slight hint of r/incel.
/r/MensRights08/04/18 09:26 PM
1

Thank you so very much for using that term, "outrage porn". As much as I believe in Men's Rights, I feel like we've seen some spillover since r/incels was shut down. Since then, it's been outage porn and circlejerk. People seem to forget that there are benevolent feminists, just as there are malicious ones, but a lot of posters just rail on women as a whole. Must be a sad life for those people, obsessing on what their enemy is doing.
/r/MensRights08/04/18 09:22 PM
1

"Esteysi “Stacy” Sanchez of Oceanside faces 15 years to life in prison when she is sentenced May 31 in the death of 69-year-old Jack Ray Tenhulzen." Quoted from the article. Are you saying the journalist got their facts wrong, or are you just pulling baseless assumptions out of your ass based on her sex?
/r/MensRights08/04/18 09:18 PM
7

She's facing 15 to life. Do we really need this kind of cynicism?
/r/MensRights08/04/18 03:25 AM
10

Talk about taking things out of context. Geez, man.
/r/MensRights06/04/18 10:44 AM
1

This was already proven false, and the mods have warned against posting this lie Reported
/r/MensRights31/03/18 05:32 AM
2

This is an older man who likely grew up during the peak of the Black Panther party's influence, which is likely what formed his racist views. He even name drops the Panthers in the article. The amount of mental gymnastics needed to work feminism into this is staggering.
/r/MensRights31/03/18 01:43 AM
-1

There is nothing here relevant to Men's Rights. Has this sub devolved into nothing but circlejerking and outrage porn? If I wanted that, I could go visit r/The_Donald
/r/MensRights31/03/18 12:49 AM
6

He was mentioned. Bottom of the article. In jail for murdering the younger brother.
/r/MensRights30/03/18 06:13 PM
2

Thank you for the well researched reading material. It does really help affirm our position and what we stand for. I guess I'm just getting fatigued from a lot of the circlejerking and outrage porn that makes its way into this sub. I think what a lot of us need is perspective, not just on our goals, but on who would stand in the way of those goals.
/r/MensRights30/03/18 10:38 AM
3

As I see it, this is not a men's rights issue, but a child protection issue. The father was is jail for murdering the younger brother, the mother lost custody and likely had a history of pain killer use/alcohol use. Why was her son with her if she lost custody? Why was the grandmother complicit in covering up the crime?
/r/MensRights30/03/18 10:28 AM
0

Speculation and assumption. There have been many high profile cases of mothers murdering children that make national headlines. Off the top of my head, Casey Anthony. Regardless of news coverage, your comment has nothing to do with the crime, or the article. EDIT: The father was in jail for murdering the 1 year old brother. Show me the national outrage. Bonus points for a protest.
/r/MensRights30/03/18 10:22 AM
3

Thank you as well, right at the bottom. EDIT: Having 2 kids under 4 myself, it breaks my heart that both of those boys were killed by the people who should have loved them most.
/r/MensRights30/03/18 10:19 AM
5

She lost custody of her son, so the court acknowledged she was not a suitable parent at the time. Why the boy was with her, the article doesn't seem to specify. As for the father, I'm not really sure what your trying to imply from his lack of mention, but he is not essential to the article, as he had nothing to do with the murder.
/r/MensRights30/03/18 10:13 AM
41

This is a pretty big step toward equal rights, and in a sector where men are hurting the most. A big kudos to the Danish government!
/r/MensRights30/03/18 09:51 AM
3

Please explain how this pertains to Men's Rights? And don't say it's because a boy died. It's tragic, but the gender is irrelevant in the case.
/r/MensRights30/03/18 09:47 AM
2

You've got me there, sir.
/r/MensRights28/03/18 12:31 PM
-10

Because not all feminists are the same. You know, sort of like how not all MRAs are misogynistic? Seriously, if you're going to brand everyone the same, all you're doing is making us look bad.
/r/MensRights28/03/18 12:09 PM
284

This is what this sub needs more of. There are good feminists out there, and we need to connect with them to help get our message out. These feminists aren't our enemy. However, I feel like most of this sub's posts are outrage circlejerk, whether it's against radical feminists or just some crazy shit a few women have done.
/r/MensRights28/03/18 09:29 AM
3

Don't count on him taking the hint. He posted this same thing last night, and was still demonizing women as a whole. I called him out on it, and he resorted to childish name-calling. The guy obviously has a chip on his shoulder.
/r/MensRights23/03/18 09:00 PM
1

Watched this with my wife. That was actually a pretty good laugh. Thanks for that.
/r/MensRights23/03/18 05:08 AM
-1

I don't think I read into it too much. "Women get a license to kill. If you look closely at all the birth certificates they have it says “female” and its internationally recognized as the legal basis to fuck men over without repercussion. " That's a horrible generalization of women in general, and makes it look like he has a big chip on his shoulder. Bearing in mind, I made this call before checking his post history, which seems to support that theory. And regarding your original post, I did hav…
/r/MensRights23/03/18 03:31 AM
1

Understandable. I guess it's just his wording that annoyed me. It honestly sounded like he has a massive chip on his shoulder, and based on post history, he does seem to.
/r/MensRights23/03/18 03:09 AM
1

I'm disappointed we can't have an intelligent discussion, and that you resorted to childish name-calling. One thing I have discovered about this sub, and I believe you have fallen victim to it, is that it is easy to become bitter and detached toward women if you only read the negative posts. Just focusing on what a few evil women do can wear you down, similar to violence in news. We need to also celebrate our achievements, raise ourselves up, and gain perspective on how far we've come. We can't …
/r/MensRights23/03/18 02:58 AM
4

I never said anything about staying silent. Think about it like this. A MRA should be like a Paladin, typically Lawful Good. We should persecute evil, but stay virtuous and avoid overzealousness by lumping the innocent in with the evildoers. That would make us Chaotic Good. Well-intentioned, but with an "ends justifies the means" attitude. For comparison, popular branches of feminism can be seen as chaotic neutral. Overzealous, and damaging to their enemies and Innocents, harming others as much …
/r/MensRights23/03/18 02:37 AM
-1

Well then, let's prove we can rise above hatred, and succeed where radical feminists fail.
/r/MensRights23/03/18 02:23 AM
-3

I'd like to think this sub is above generalizing all women as greedy and manipulative.
/r/MensRights23/03/18 02:20 AM
2

Well, etymology aside, advocating for equal rights for all is a noble endeavor. Keep perspective on your goal. Feminism has splintered many times because they lack a focused goal, and the same could happen to the MRM.
/r/MensRights18/03/18 02:41 AM
1

As long as the end goal is equal rights and opportunity for all. However, I don't realistically see feminists offering to roll back some of their rights to match men's. That where MRAs come in. Advocate for men to have the same rights women have that have been neglected in men. But again, being both at once is redundant, as it then classifies as egalitarianism
/r/MensRights18/03/18 02:33 AM
1

If you advocate for equal rights and opportunity for both sexes, then you classify more closely with an Egalitarian. However, not as many people will know what that is, so the label will mean less, assuming the label is important. While being a feminist and a MRA are not mutually exclusive, being both lends it to a different name.
/r/MensRights18/03/18 02:16 AM
2

Best Rainbow Road is 7's. Wait.. Wrong sub. EDIT: I'm sure I'm not the only one that read it as Rainbow Road
/r/MensRights17/03/18 03:43 AM
2

This almost reads like the Onion. "“PlayerUnknown’s Battleground,” a multiplayer online fighting game."
/r/MensRights16/03/18 07:31 PM
-1

Read the article. She made those remarks 5 years ago. We really shouldn't be getting on someone's case for a minor remark made that long ago.
/r/MensRights14/03/18 05:25 AM
5

"Mah vaginaaa..." -Amy Schumer You know she's funny, women are funny, get over yourself.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 07:50 PM
6

Wow, that takes me back. What's Adam Corolla doing nowadays anyway?
/r/MensRights08/03/18 01:51 AM
17

Everyone's already seen her naked anyway. The internet remembers.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 08:46 PM
14

For the sake of promoting conversation, I'd wager that these bars are not making a political or socialogical statement, but rather it implies a biological predisposition women have toward chocolate. We all know that some stereotypes exist for a reason. Elderly drivers, men and sports, women and chocolate. Whoever captioned the picture is missing the point. It wouldn't really be for feminists. If anything, it should annoy them, since it promotes a stereotype.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 10:41 PM
2

As well as that being completely irrelevant to the topic, it's also called exaggerating. We were busy discussing your open hostilities to all women, despite it being a select few who actively infringe on Men's Rights. Honestly, your deflection makes you sound like a feminist arguing.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 08:27 PM
4

And this is the exact opposite of the aforementioned women; a childless, womanless man. To your credit though, someone must've hurt you bad, but that's no reason to throw cunt around like it's going out of style.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 08:17 PM
2

Comments like this would probably contribute to a toxic image. There's really no need for it.
/r/MensRights05/02/18 09:53 PM
7

I like the guy who did lines of coke to counter the drugs. When you really don't want to be raped, you do some pretty hardcore shit
/r/MensRights04/02/18 10:59 PM
1

Anyone who keeps up with South Park knows the clip you're talking about, but I'm just wondering if it's a grey area posting a full episode. I imagine YouTube would take it down.
/r/MensRights21/01/18 11:51 PM
11

This doesn't really have anything to do with Men's Rights, and as someone with a week old child, this is not shit I want to read.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 07:49 AM
16

While I don't agree with the 'rape' charge, he absolutely deserves a long sentence. I mean, these are under age kids he's grooming and forcefully coercing into performing sex acts, including threatening their families.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 05:20 AM
55

All seriousness aside, perhaps the wife has been watching too much Pornhub
/r/MensRights23/11/17 04:30 PM
23

Now Crews I'm likely to believe. Not because I like the guy, or the fact that he's a man, but by virtue of him naming his alleged assaulter and filing the police report. Actions speak louder than words, every time.
/r/MensRights15/11/17 10:01 PM
29

Hang on, if you think about it, she's doing what's best for the company from a financial standpoint. By purging male employees and hiring more females, she's cutting the cost of the company's labor down to 78%!
/r/MensRights11/11/17 08:59 AM
1

Ah, virtue signalling
/r/MensRights09/11/17 04:37 PM
25

Glad to see Crews actually file the report. Seems like after making the accusations, most of these celebrities are content with never following up. Hopefully this encourages more people to actually file reports to see their assailants brought to justice. Unless, you know, they were lying. Or it's likely how that one lady was " assaulted" by Bush Sr.
/r/MensRights09/11/17 02:44 AM
1

https://imgur.com/a/RPdFQ Poor Mike looks like he really doesn't want to be there...
/r/MensRights25/10/17 03:44 AM
6

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/74yq21/were_currently_being_brigaded_by_classic/ This troll is gaslighting. Just ignore her and move on. Sometimes the only winning move is not to play.
/r/MensRights08/10/17 01:58 AM
2

I've got no clue what we're doing anymore. All I know is that you're some awful combination of misinformed and stubborn, which kind of describes a feminist, and can't really be reasoned with, so I'm bowing out of this one before I waste any more of my time.
/r/MensRights07/10/17 11:07 PM
2

It's like going around in circles here. Yes, I've said that 3 times, there are more women in health care than men, but there is a higher ratio of men in healthcare than there is women in trade work. And this is my second time saying that paramedics are trained to specialize in a particular area of healthcare, as opposed to general knowledge, like everyone except GPs and RNs. Specializing makes someone more useful than being a jack of all trades, but none are unneeded. So yes, doctors are more ed…
/r/MensRights07/10/17 10:59 PM
4

I think we're being a dead horse here. I say downvote and ignore. Let her delude herself
/r/MensRights07/10/17 10:54 PM
6

Physical health takes priority over mental. Go to any hospital. They serve people according to a heiarchy, and unless someone is so mentally ill that they'll cause themselves PHYSICAL harm, it's a long wait. (Canadian BTW). And no debate that the general consensus on nursing is it being female dominated, but there are many male nurses now, mostly due to a surge in healthcare needs and an aging population. Teaching is dominated by women in the lower grades, with children. However, male presence c…
/r/MensRights07/10/17 10:50 PM
6

Actually, I already pointed out that nurses are also invaluable to society, however the same cannot be said for therapists, particularly for anything non-clinical. Having suffered a brief bout of debilitating depression, I found that the answers were easy, but the execution was difficult. My point was that there is a higher percentage of men in health care, teaching, etc. than there is women in trades and other labor intensive jobs. And just because you're annoying me now, yes, a nurse will take…
/r/MensRights07/10/17 10:35 PM
14

I don't even know where to start with that comparison. How about this? When roads need repairing, I don't see a social worker doing the hard labor. If your roof needs fixing, is a teacher going to patch it up? Most trades and manual labor jobs are dominated by men, and such jobs are vital to infrastructure, as well as being necessary in everyday contracting. Granted, nurses and teachers are amazing jobs, and we couldn't get by without them, but these fields see a larger degree of men than trade …
/r/MensRights07/10/17 10:22 PM
1

Men need time to just be bros. Where your average Joe can go to get fit, lose a few pounds. Make it a non intimidating atmosphere, with no women around to make a guy feel self-conscious, where bros can be bros. But with more heavy metal. And the requisite grunting and groaning from large sweaty men screaming at one another. It's not gay. https://tenor.com/view/seinfeld-george-costanza-jason-alexander-not-that-theres-anything-wrong-with-that-gif-4119778
/r/MensRights12/09/17 09:23 AM
80

At some point we have to stop assuming you're just having bad luck with men and look at the common denominator
/r/MensRights03/09/17 09:16 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter