TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Shadowkyzr Archive

View 0 posts and 47 comments by Shadowkyzr on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Thanks!
/r/MensRights02/08/16 08:30 PM
5

Fantastic, absolutely amazing. Can you link to the original post? I'd like to read those comments.
/r/MensRights02/08/16 08:23 PM
1

I suppose if the teacher and child's genders were switched, I can see you point. As it stands, I don't the situation would have played out differently if it were a father or mother who did the recording.
/r/MensRights09/01/16 12:34 AM
4

Agreed, a *person should have the right to protect their children. I really don't see this playing out differently if it were a mother instead of a father.
/r/MensRights09/01/16 12:33 AM
1

I'm unclear why exactly this is a mensrights post. It seems like more of a broken law issue to me; the teacher is unfairly protected by virtue of being a tenured teacher, not a woman. I can't envision the situation being different if it was a mother who enacted the recording. Shitty teachers/lawyers are still shitty.
/r/MensRights08/01/16 07:39 PM
2

Jebus. Thanks for the insight.
/r/MensRights09/08/15 07:16 PM
6

Can you elaborate? I'd like to get some perspective from a woman who (seemingly) has actually been to one.
/r/MensRights09/08/15 07:01 PM
2

A lot of men don't have any real body strength to speak of, and are as a result about the same strength as women in general. Likewise, some women work out a lot or are fit. You make some fairly reasonable points, with the exception of these statements. On average, men are bigger and stronger than women, regardless of whether or not they work out. Comparatively, men do have more body strength. Also, the percentage of women who work out or are fit is offset by the percentage of men who do the same…
/r/MensRights22/02/15 09:58 PM
1

Interesting points, thanks for the info. I personally have a more encompassing view (there is not "us" and "them", just people with differing opinions) that allows for the establishment of common ground. I also don't think of the women who subscribe to the aforementioned ideas as "feminists". Feminists to me are people who demand the same respect and opportunities for women as are afforded to men, and the accompanying responsibilities. The people who hold the ideas you mention are doing so typic…
/r/MensRights12/02/15 07:50 PM
-1

Awesome. I believe, at their respective cores, Feminism and the MRM advocate the same things, but both sides are so polarized and they can't see it. Best of luck.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 06:08 AM
2

Seriously? It's a joke. Let's not throw a hissy fit because someone said something humorous that's also mildly offensive.
/r/MensRights03/02/15 02:24 AM
7

Has this been posted in /r/feminism? I'd be interested to hear what they have to say about it.
/r/MensRights15/01/15 05:18 PM
2

While I have my own opinions on drunk fucking, I'd urge you to be careful with your logic there. Legally, being drunk and fucking = rape in some places.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 03:45 AM
4

As evidenced by the comments here, this phrase can rub people the wrong way for a variety of reasons. For me personally, it's abrasive because people know rape is bad, and not to do it. To insinuate that we need to teach rational people not to rape is idiotic, that's like teaching that murder is bad or stealing is bad. Any rational person knows rape is bad, if someone says rape is justified or what have you, there is something wrong with that person. What the phrase instead should be is "teach p…
/r/MensRights11/12/14 10:04 PM
1

True, I'll agree most people are willing to just accept whatever is put in front of them without questioning it, even pseudoscientific bullshit. Fair enough. Happy thanksgiving when it comes to you.
/r/MensRights27/11/14 05:46 AM
1

But that strong/exclusive attraction is what makes it hebephilia. The image uses one example of a "13 year old" who looks 20ish. Hebephilia generally refers to the sexual attraction to pubescent 11-14 year olds, the large majority of whom do not look 20. Side Note: The image uses the "hebephilia" improperly (not entirely in accordance with its actual definition), and makes a ridiculous claim that "Canadian psychologists" actually believe it (without contextualizing which subset or group of Canad…
/r/MensRights27/11/14 05:12 AM
1

But that strong preference/exclusive attraction for younger women, in this case 14 y/o or less, is what constitutes hebephilia.
/r/MensRights27/11/14 04:52 AM
1

Google the definition. Most sources say "preference" or "primary", Wikipedia says "exclusive".
/r/MensRights26/11/14 11:29 PM
1

I will concede the point that mental development has very little to do with objective sexual interest. However your first point is simply wrong in this case. First, people don't start and finish puberty overnight; this is a process that takes years. While some individuals may start developing secondary sex characteristics around 11, they aren't likely to finish developing before 14. People are still developing through the rest of their teens and sometimes through their early twenties. Here is wh…
/r/MensRights26/11/14 09:59 PM
6

Not just pubescent girls, early adolescence. Typically aged 11-14. Again, while we are biologically programmed to find youth and secondary sex characteristics attractive, an exclusive sexual preference for these "young women" who are mentally more like children is absurd.
/r/MensRights26/11/14 08:05 PM
6

Did anyone actually look up "hebephilia"? It's not just an attraction to post-pubescent young girls, it's a preference or exclusive sexual interest in them. Yes, men obviously find women's secondary sex characteristics as attractive and post-pubescent women will have attractive qualities. But men who are exclusively sexually interested in girls that are physically mature but still mentally developing is fucked up. What the fuck /r/mensrights, how is this up a debate?
/r/MensRights26/11/14 07:51 PM
3

I don't understand, why is this in /r/mensrights?
/r/MensRights22/11/14 05:39 PM
1

If you say so. I disagree, but I'll respect your opinion.
/r/MensRights18/11/14 07:43 PM
1

I'm not saying "no true feminist would...blah blah blah". I'm saying let's not generalize the actions of some people to an entire group with which they may or may not even identify.
/r/MensRights18/11/14 02:50 AM
1

Let's be reasonable. Sure there may be people who ragequit relationships by throwing a tantrum and breaking everything, but it's stupid to say that is par for the course when dating a feminist.
/r/MensRights17/11/14 09:29 PM
1

I wrote this in a paper proposal: "The majority of present studies examine the effect of males’ high status on their level of attractiveness and females’ physical attributes on their level of attractiveness, and notedly fewer studies examine females’ status or males’ physical attributes and their effect on attractiveness. In fact, Singh (1995) makes note of this in her work saying “The attractiveness of a man depends predominantly upon his skill and prowess rather than upon his physical appearan…
/r/MensRights09/09/14 09:57 PM
8

You mean failing to recognize that common ground? I agree.
/r/MensRights19/08/14 07:12 PM
1

That sounds really condescending.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 10:15 PM
3

(Aside from the spelling errors) the fact that this image could elicit a "that's bullshit, he probably would want it" response is really indicative how how differently we still treat male and female sexuality. Arguably, no one would see the reverse image and think "that's bullshit, she probably would want that".
/r/MensRights01/06/14 05:32 PM
2

I'm in complete agreement. There's always been a noticeable presence of anti-feminist sentiments here, which isn't necessarily productive to the pro-men's rights movement, and this has increased recently. Men's Rights needs to refocus the efforts to obtain men's rights where they are lacking, not become a sounding board for "look, this feminist did something I disagree with!"
/r/MensRights31/05/14 08:59 PM
2

Maybe my brain is just fried from studying, but I'm having a difficult time understanding what you're getting at here. Who is using that argument?
/r/MensRights15/05/14 12:27 AM
3

You're right. As a guy, I have a hard time understanding and verbalizing the kind of issues women face. It's because I have this difficulty understanding these issues that I'm subscribed to both /r/mensrights and /r/feminism. It's so that I learn that things like catcalling, whereas I might think it's harmless and "people call you hot walking down the street? Sounds awesome! I wish I could get that confidence booster!" can be construed for women (and usually is) as a significantly larger and str…
/r/MensRights15/05/14 12:21 AM
2

I disagree. Women face legitimate issues as well. Sexism against both sexes is prevalent.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 11:27 PM
2

I think both groups are discriminated against in different ways.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 09:29 PM
6

Except, we do the same thing. We say we believe in equality for all people, and call ourselves men's rights activists because we focus on ways in which men are disadvantaged. It's not wrong to focus on one aspect of a larger issue. The top two panels are fine. The bottom two panels have the guy being a douche and the woman starting to slander his character. That's just unnecessary on both accounts.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 04:01 PM
4

That's a bit of a stretch. I've never heard of keeping in shape as manning up, nor have I heard of any radical feminists denouncing people who go to the gym. In this scenario, "these misandrists" is really just this one person.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 03:44 PM
28

This title is misleading. He's telling /r/raskmen about how she gets upset about his attempts to get rid of the condoms (with his sperm) and his distrust of her, not about her inability to find condoms. No where does it say she's even looking for them.
/r/MensRights03/12/13 09:39 PM
1

That's not feminism. It's either fake, or plain insanity.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 04:11 PM
1

One way it's interesting is that it provides a clear and concise perspective on what each group finds important. The fact that the two groups are constantly at war with each other can now be evidently distilled to the fact that they place different levels of importance on different things in the same arena of rights and gender.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 06:39 PM
5

My thinking is that after the child is born, how is killing it any different from killing any other person?
/r/MensRights24/02/13 07:43 PM
6

How is this not murder?
/r/MensRights24/02/13 06:11 PM
8

I think this is a very interesting article for exploration. I don't understand, however, what this has to do with Men's Rights. Especially considering that the examples they mention include girls and boys. Can you elaborate please?
/r/MensRights03/02/13 11:23 PM
1

Just doing my duty, citizen.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 10:36 PM
8

http://assets0.ordienetworks.com/misc/I98Dj.gif
/r/MensRights05/11/12 10:30 PM
4

Thank you, for having a using your brain.
/r/MensRights03/11/12 02:11 AM
3

But that's the very issue here. Both men AND women take that risk. For a woman, if the sex results in pregnancy and she doesn't want the baby, there are options she can take (independent of the male) to absolve herself of responsibility. For a man, if the sex results in pregnancy and he doesn't want the baby, there are no options available to absolve himself of the responsibilities.
/r/MensRights03/11/12 02:00 AM
3

This comment literally adds nothing to the discussion. The others, at least, tried to add a valid point. You are simply attacking another member here.
/r/MensRights03/11/12 01:48 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter