TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Shagata_Ganai Archive

View 0 posts and 57 comments by Shagata_Ganai on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Yes, having been one of those, I took it for granted. But that is the biggie, really.
/r/MensRights16/08/11 12:12 AM

That would be 'walking sperm banks', would it not?
/r/MensRights15/08/11 05:34 PM
3

If you're the one calling yourself "mistrustful-looking", what the Hell do you think she's looking at?
/r/seduction17/06/11 05:05 AM
6

Yup. I see examples of all types in my job. You are correct.
/r/MensRights28/03/11 02:33 AM
3

Well, both, really, but you're correct. Bigger problem for those poor stiffs.
/r/MensRights28/03/11 01:50 AM
43

Problem for these women is, there aren't many guys that stupid who make real money. Too fucking bad. They'll just mistreat the guy they "settle for" and then make his life hell through child support.
/r/MensRights27/03/11 03:52 PM
5

Always a pleasure to meet a person of honor, and someone with the courage of their convictions.
/r/MensRights27/03/11 02:57 AM
1

Feminist-in-Chief?
/r/MensRights09/03/11 12:11 AM
3

Forbidden by the Constitution. Cruel, and unusual.
/r/MensRights28/01/11 10:56 PM
4

Cougars don't play the same games, if any at all, as young women. They know what they like and they'll ask for it. I have always found women to be receptive to a dominant male, even if she makes the first move. So just do what works for you normally, just watch for a different set of cues. Should be like shooting fish in a barrel, from what you describe. Pack extras. <!>
/r/seduction24/12/10 02:22 AM
2

Killing is too good for this loser. Every so often a case comes along and makes me think of how the Saudis deal justice seems better, sometimes, than banning "cruel and unusual". Because a "Scarlet E" for extortionist seems about right for her. And then I come back to my senses, and give thanks that I'm here.
/r/MensRights20/12/10 10:41 PM
1

No method, unless you consider a relaxed look around the room to see if there are any takers on your rock-steady gaze. That's gaze, not leer.
/r/seduction15/12/10 06:23 PM
0

Guess you didn't read the fucking part of the fucking post where I fucking said "new, pressed" fucking jeans. Am I fucking right?
/r/MensRights22/08/10 01:16 PM
1

Or, alternately, "It makes no difference."
/r/MensRights21/08/10 02:19 AM
0

So you feel that the organization's beef was with the fact that the denim wrapped around each leg, instead of both? The whole argument was preposterous. The rule should have been "no denim material" and anyone with an ounce of sense can see this.
/r/MensRights21/08/10 02:16 AM
8

No, I know women have an easier time in life, if they live in the West. Know any guys being set up in apartments, being bought cars and jewelery? Me neither.
/r/MensRights20/08/10 12:04 AM
2

A leather, fur-trimmed sporran would set it off nicely.
/r/MensRights19/08/10 11:47 PM
2

This is another area where you benefit if you have a cunt. Years ago, I witnessed a HUGE argument between a coworker and our supervisor. Women could wear denim because it was a skirt, but guys couldn't wear new, pressed jeans. I still think my buddy was right, that it was discrimination.
/r/MensRights19/08/10 11:09 PM
2

Well, Vince Lombardi once said, "Once you set a goal for yourself, the price you pay is immaterial". Don't let someone else's poisoned viewpoint get stuck in your craw. I know it's hard not to, sometimes.
/r/MensRights24/07/10 11:55 AM
3

No one likes to be stolen from, lied to, and kept from seeing the flesh of your flesh. Turn anger to action. And the very best of luck.
/r/MensRights24/07/10 03:12 AM
4

It really should be thrown out, so as not to give men false hope that the judges will do the legal, and correct thing.
/r/MensRights23/07/10 09:38 PM
5

I could tell you about a guy I know whose ex got the kids because the ex's new husband is the DA. The guy is an audio expert, and has evidence that tapes supposedly made by the DA's office are edited, but can't get the evidence admitted, somehow. Gee, I wonder not at all. Hang in there.
/r/MensRights23/07/10 09:15 PM
8

This is a miscarriage of justice, with deep roots in the paternalistic society, and part of judicial system is psychotic. As soon as you can, put a PI on her. I'm betting you can get the kids by showing her lifestyle, associates . Not just for a week, but over a year or so, you can impugn her character severely. Never quit. The kids will feel it, even if you tell them nothing, if you never stop fighting to get them, they will know. And they will know you are love. And they will never forget
/r/MensRights23/07/10 08:50 PM
7

We fathers who take the time know what our value is to our children. They give back what they get. If they get love and support, at all times, from both parents, that is what they learn to give. I just don't understand the post-feminist need to minimize the contributions of all the great dads out here.
/r/MensRights13/06/10 11:10 PM
2

So, what do you suggest? Twenty acres and a pony? Power is never given, it is taken. But the females need to be little more together. You cannot have half the group gaming the system (Woman."You asked me out, you should pay for the dinner"), lagging behind so that the male is almost forced to hold the door for her, with the other half of the group getting pissed off at these things.
/r/MensRights25/04/10 12:04 PM
1

You are correct. It's been a long time since I read the Heinlein novel that had those particulars in it, but knowing his persona, I should have been able to deduce, if not remember that. Thanks.
/r/MensRights18/04/10 02:37 PM
2

Ok, so it is what Heinlein had in mind, then. Can't happen soon enough.
/r/MensRights17/04/10 11:40 PM
1

I don't know any specifics of what you refer to, but I assume it is an agreement freeing the male of any responsibility for unwanted pregnancies that the female decides not to terminate.
/r/MensRights17/04/10 10:36 PM
15

Robert Heinlein covers marriage contracts in many of his books. The specifics (duration, children or no, etc) were all agreed upon up front, and at the end of the contract the pair can decide to "re-up", or head for greener pastures. But Heinlein was writing about a society that was rational at its core. We do not currently have that situation in the United States.
/r/MensRights17/04/10 09:53 PM
1

"I'm posting this here so you can go somewhere else to reply". Nice.
/r/MensRights28/03/10 03:57 PM
1

I fear we may be a very, very small minority. But it is good to know we are morally superior to Malignant Dick Cheney. Because we have principles, and Malignant Dick is on record as saying, "Principles are OK, up to a point."
/r/MensRights22/03/10 10:51 PM
-7

My sense of humor is fine. This is not a funny topic.
/r/MensRights20/03/10 03:30 AM
-5

We all hope you evolve soon.
/r/MensRights20/03/10 03:00 AM
-1

Unfortunately, there are still guys who think misogynist jokes are funny. The self-actualized men and women are going to have to drag our lesser brethren and sisteren, kicking and screaming that they are misunderstood,with us, like it or not.
/r/MensRights20/03/10 01:15 AM
4

I actually had to explain this to a male redditor who had been punched so hard in the jaw by his gf. that it was still sore the next day. Unbelievable.
/r/MensRights20/03/10 01:09 AM
1

Hear, hear!
/r/MensRights20/03/10 12:25 AM
10

Yeah, I know what you mean. My wife liked to have "rape" fantasies after we had been together for several years. And every time she said "No" or "stop", I would, and would lose the wood, and the desire, leading to many fights, until we figured out a better method. I must be a prime candidate, too, eh?
/r/MensRights20/03/10 12:24 AM
3

Once again, women want to retain the advantages they have been granted for decades by the "patriarchy", and equality when it suits them. Waiter, check please.
/r/MensRights19/03/10 06:41 PM
0

Are you a professional point-misser, or do you just do this in your spare time?
/r/MensRights15/12/09 12:26 AM
1

He never knew. By the time I discussed the circumstances with my bride, and she explained the ins and outs (pun intended) of hormones and "the pill", they had been married ~a year, and nothing was to be gained except heartache and recrimination. But she has to live with it. Still makes me angry, though.
/r/MensRights14/12/09 12:24 AM
5

And how does one protect oneself from lies? A good friend of mine is now married because the cunt he was fucking said she "forgot" her birth control pills on a weekend trip. This is not how BCPs work, but he did not know this. So he is now married, probably would not have married this particular woman if she had not deliberately gone off the pill to become pregnant and pull him into marriage (he was too nice a guy to say "good luck, I'll send the check every month, and she knew this) . Kinda sho…
/r/MensRights13/12/09 10:08 PM
12

Women want equality except when they hold an advantage ( Waiter, check, please.) Then they want "the patriarchy" to take care of them like it always has.
/r/MensRights13/12/09 10:01 PM
10

Wow. That's a lot of anger to walk around with. I have no sympathy for people (male or female) who run across an asshole, or double-asshole, or even the rare triple-asshole, *and then proceed to make that person's problems, peccadilloes, obnoxiousness, etc., into their own problem. If this guy was giving her a hard time, she would have been within her rights to dope-slap or otherwise jack him up. But this bitch acts as if she is the only one being offended by this unbearable boor/asshole. She is…
/r/MensRights25/11/09 11:50 PM
0

The article can be reduced to this, on any topic: Perception is reality.
/r/MensRights11/11/09 01:55 PM
1

Ok. I wrote it, but you know what it means. "With the exception (of missing) a few ball games, I don't miss a thing."
/r/MensRights12/09/09 01:30 AM
3

Are you referring to the games I'm not watching? The post says, clearly, that I miss them, but I don't see them.
/r/MensRights12/09/09 01:15 AM
11

Here's a better idea. Kill your television. My household is going on 9 months or so without it. My kid reads more, does homework without being "badgered". And you know what? With the exception of a few ball games, I don't miss a thing, and I now waste more time on the computer or reading, or doing what I'm supposed to. Sometimes.
/r/MensRights12/09/09 12:26 AM
-5

Downmodded for title space given to a word (Feminazi, which I still don't even understand) in current use by the far-right wing.
/r/MensRights11/09/09 06:08 PM
10

Joke's on her. Wait until she finds out what her options for sexual fulfillment are in nine or so years, when she looks even more like a fucking walrus.
/r/MensRights21/08/09 08:35 PM
2

Eyewash, ladies and gentlemen. Pure eyewash.
/r/MensRights19/08/09 05:34 PM
0

Separate the genders. Boys will distract each other, left to their own devices, but add in girls, and they have little concentration left for the lessons at hand. (I am obviously talking about middle school and up) With this system, females may score even higher, due to the lack of distraction from the boys, but the boys can be better focused with a stronger emphasis on discipline.
/r/MensRights18/08/09 01:07 AM
6

More verbiage about women and their "choices" and how agonizing they can be. Jesus! What a bunch of bungee baloney. You know what to do, girls? Find a man with whom you can share a plan for a life/style/time. My bride used to make more dough than I, so when it came time for someone to stay home, there was no "agonizing decision". I stayed home, worked as a commercial cleaning manager at night. No sense working for the privilege of having someone else raise my child and instill their values and m…
/r/MensRights16/08/09 11:15 PM
15

Right. Wonder if the judge will ask if the bimboslut sucked his toenails out through his dick. Because that's about the same chance she has at getting anything like that amount. I mean, who the fuck does this cunt think she is, Heather Mills?
/r/MensRights14/08/09 01:18 AM
24

Slavery. Cancel all life insurance, spend/sell all assets. Throw massive good-bye party. Have EAT ME tattooed on chest. Overdose on heroin after sending letters telling the story to all national newspapers with all names involved in bold print. Extreme? Sure. But she goes down in history as a bloodsucker who drove a guy to kill himself. IMO, it beats shooting the bitch, which is what she really deserves. The corrosive cunt.
/r/MensRights01/05/09 02:34 AM
-1

Guys, there are the parameters. Know them, understand them, respect them, and remember, no cunt is worth a lifetime of taking it in the can.
/r/MensRights28/12/08 02:17 AM
-1

Join the real world, bitches.
/r/MensRights24/09/08 11:04 PM
2

Hops into it. Fixed that for you.
/r/MensRights19/09/08 04:33 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter