Shahid9s Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	Is it true that men don’t need women to survive while the opposite is true? Learn to read what is written, not what you think is written. Women do all the work they did back, even today. The point is that work is not needed for survival. Compare that with what men do. - grow food - transport food - sanitation - protection without their work you would not survive long.	/r/ExRedPill	13/06/23 09:25 PM
1	Is it true that men don’t need women to survive while the opposite is true? Yes, you are delusional if you are going to ignore thousands of years of history and think ww2 in only usa is your irrefutable proof.	/r/ExRedPill	12/06/23 10:37 PM
1	Is it true that men don’t need women to survive while the opposite is true? No such tribes. Even if they were, one attack from a male tribe and they'll all be slaves.	/r/ExRedPill	12/06/23 10:35 PM
1	Is it true that men don’t need women to survive while the opposite is true? It is not irrelevant, you only say that because it doesn't support your delusions. Take any war, before ww2 and see that women didn't do jack. Men did everything. Just because you're ignorant, don't assume others are too.	/r/ExRedPill	11/06/23 08:32 PM
1	Is it true that men don’t need women to survive while the opposite is true? Four "thousands" of years women only treated the injured when there was a shortage of people. Muslim women treated the wounded Muslims in the first couple battles since Muslims were so few and they had to have every single able bodied male fighting. The Mushrik Arabs fighting the Muslims did not have any females treating anyone since they had the numbers. Like I said before, men and women need each other to survive as a species, but to survive (live their life to their life span) then men can do…	/r/ExRedPill	11/06/23 08:29 PM
1	Is it true that men don’t need women to survive while the opposite is true? What happend in WWI? (or the wars before that) Did the men die out because women didn't take their jobs? See, you take things that don't matter and think they matter.	/r/ExRedPill	10/06/23 08:15 PM
1	Is it true that men don’t need women to survive while the opposite is true? No. If there were no women, then men would treat them. Or they would change their fighting strategy. Female nurses on the battlefield is a new thing, what did the men do for thousands of years before that? go extinct?	/r/ExRedPill	10/06/23 08:13 PM
2	Is it true that men don’t need women to survive while the opposite is true? support roles do not equal survival skills. Look at the past wars, women did not take up men's jobs when the men went to war, yet their society still survived.	/r/ExRedPill	09/06/23 06:21 PM
1	Is it true that men don’t need women to survive while the opposite is true? Yes, it is true. It doesn't mean you are worthless, because both genders are needed for the human race to survive through having children. What they are talking about is surviving as a gender, and that is true. Everything you see is built and maintained by men. Women did not do this, so if men disappeared then they would not know how to do it. Even as a group, rather than individuals, men have the knowledge to survive and build a society, women do not. There are some women who do but it is not e…	/r/ExRedPill	09/06/23 06:18 PM
1	Is it true that men don’t need women to survive while the opposite is true? it's totally false.	/r/ExRedPill	09/06/23 06:11 PM