TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Shaloog Archive

View 4 posts and 116 comments by Shaloog on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

Feminists: Look at all these problems women have! They are so oppressed and men are so privileged! Media, society and literally almost everything and everyone: Yes, we need to give all of our attention and support to help these poor women from being oppressed by those evil men. MRA: Actually, men too have a lot of problems. So can we get some attention and help too and can we stop pretending that we are privileged and that only women are oppressed or that they are more oppressed than men are? Fe…
/r/MensRights28/12/22 06:02 AM
11

I know that the Taliban are treating women poorly. OP's point is that wherever women are treated poorly, you can find men being treated just as badly or even worse which is true even in Afghanistan. For example, an overwhelming majority of the people fucking killed by the Taliban are men. Not to mention all the young boys who are raped who get zero media attention unlike female victims who get all the sympathy and outrage. You say that they are dismantling women's rights but it's not like men's …
/r/MensRights28/12/22 05:38 AM
9

In developed countries where every child can afford to be educated, yes both boys and girls should be sent to school as long as they are treated equally and there are no insane quotas, affirmative action, scholarships, preferential treatment, etc for girls which currently exist everywhere. In poorer countries which don't have enough resources to educate everyone, it's a no-brainer that boys education must be prioritised unless women are ready to take on the burden of being providers while their …
/r/MensRights28/12/22 05:13 AM
15

He's saying that men are held responsible to provide for their families and therefore they need education so that they can get jobs and make money whereas women have no such obligations and can go through their entire lives with no problem by just being housewives. That's the reason why boys are sent to schools and girls are not. It used to be the same in India too in the past and even now in rural areas where parents can't afford to educate all of their children due to poverty. They prioritise …
/r/MensRights28/12/22 04:59 AM
9

The state of women in India is not "bad". This is a common misconception which a lot of people unfortunately have due to media's brainwashing. Indian women have tons of power and privilege. They have it MUCH better compared to the state of Indian men.
/r/MensRights06/12/22 02:38 PM
4

Fyi, even white MEN are pestered for pictures. It's got nothing to do with gender and there's no sexual intention behind it. It's just because most people here have never seen a foreigner before in their entire lives. If you don't believe me then see some of Harald Baldr's videos where he visits India. For example, if you saw a giant pink elephant walking down the street, you too would want to take a picture. I know it's rude but don't forget that India is a third world country where many people…
/r/MensRights08/10/22 07:49 AM
3

200 pounds is a lot of money in India. For example, that's enough money to cover my entire monthly expenses. And like you said, both parents are responsible for the child but the courts always put the burden entirely on the fathers.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 03:18 PM
2

I hate the term "Man" and I am very upset and offended that your username is a"Man"isNoone03. I demand that you delete your account immediately unless you are willing to be a dick with no regard for your fellow humans.
/r/MensRights15/05/22 11:45 AM
3

Congrats. Society really does get mad when it sees a successful single man just living by himself without letting others exploit him for his money.
/r/MensRights01/10/21 05:51 PM
2

It's honestly terrifying. One false accusation from an angry bitch is all it takes to ruin your life. You might spend years in jail for a crime you didn't commit and even if you somehow manage to avoid jail, you still have to spend years running around courts paying fees and bribes. On top of that you will lose your job, society will treat you like a criminal & your passport and visas will get cancelled so that you can't leave the country. My only goal in life right now is to make enough money t…
/r/MensRights01/10/21 12:23 PM
19

It boggles my mind that they say such stuff when there are countless documented cases of women lying about rape. I can never bring myself to make such a blatantly false claim which can be so easily refuted.
/r/MensRights30/09/21 05:26 PM
6

I agree but men don't really have it any better in these areas. Female foeticide is still happening. Many poor and rural people don't want female children because if they have male children instead they can use them as child labour mules and later as ATMs after they've grow up. Dowry is still prevalent. Once a girl gets married, the financial burden of taking care of her falls completely on the guy. In most cases, the dowry they give indirectly goes to the girl herself in the end considering all…
/r/MensRights30/09/21 05:05 PM
3

No problem buddy. Also, you said that the condition of women in India still isn't very great so I genuinely want to know if there are any scenarios where women are treated worse than their male counterparts because of their gender. I'm not asking this to argue. I'm really curious.
/r/MensRights30/09/21 04:08 PM
6

Exactly. The rabid feminists living in metros who grow up like spoiled princesses in rich families complain on twitter non-stop about how oppressed they are because some women living in some remote village got abused. Then some laws get implemented to help women and they just end up getting exploited by women who were never oppressed in the first place and do very little to help the actual victims who originally needed those laws. For example, the free public transport, job reservations, etc wer…
/r/MensRights30/09/21 03:42 PM
5

Can you name a few scenarios where women in India are treated worse than their male counterparts because of their gender? that doesnt mean they get everything served on a silver platter Special job reservations in almost every field both in the private and public sector, female-only scholarships & charities, countless government schemes for "women empowerment" like free public transport, low-interest loans, free shelters, etc, extremely favourable treatment by both the courts and police which ha…
/r/MensRights30/09/21 03:32 PM
14

Actually when you account for women's reservation and other types of reservation based on caste, etc the total quota for reservation comes to around 70-90% depending on the state. Only 10-30% of the jobs are given based on merit. It's no wonder that the government and the country are in the condition they're in.
/r/MensRights30/09/21 09:58 AM
21

You're right and even if the girls' parents allow it, they still won't marry guys who earn less than they do. Go to any matrimonial site and in almost all girls profiles they're looking for guys who make at least 2-3x more than they do. They even have a search filter to only see the profiles of guys who earn a certain amount. And they'll spin it into how women are the biggest victims because they now have a shortage of men to marry.
/r/MensRights30/09/21 08:20 AM
3

And also the 30% reservation for women in government and public sector jobs.
/r/MensRights30/09/21 06:38 AM
26

They really do see men as nothing but disposable tools who exist only to serve women. They don't see us as human beings with our own dreams and families.
/r/MensRights28/09/21 04:17 AM
10

Same. Now I just watch anime or pre 2010 movies and shows only.
/r/MensRights07/09/21 04:18 AM
7

Now tell me how many of those 22,000 rape cases are fake. Many of those cases are either: Cases where the girl has consensual sex and then later files a rape case under "sex on the pretext of marriage" if the guy doesn't want to marry her. Cases filed by the girl's parents against her boyfriend when they don't want their daughter to have a pre-marital relationship or when their daughter elopes with her boyfriend. Cases used to extort money. Even the courts and other organizations admit this. Jus…
/r/MensRights03/09/21 09:03 AM
8

There is always at least one retard like this.
/r/MensRights03/09/21 04:32 AM
3

Yeah and also when a woman is raped, they don't send her to jail and treat her rapist as a victim, unlike in this case.
/r/MensRights30/08/21 05:55 PM
10

You're downvoted not because people don't like your argument but because people can't even understand your argument. I literally have no idea what exactly the point is that you're trying to make.
/r/MensRights30/08/21 04:42 PM
5

That's just bullshit media propaganda. Even the police here are afraid of women and all the policies and laws are in favor of women. It's anything but a patriarchy.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 10:22 AM
1

There are some stats in my post about rape rates and false cases. If you want any other particular stat you can look it up by yourself.
/r/MensRights25/08/21 07:18 AM
3

Well that + everything else you said, yes. The only other thing I said about women was the part where I quoted what you said. Somehow that was enough for you to jump to the conclusion that I think all women hate men. Which is where the 0.00000001% comes in. You don't know that she will hate you. Okay so what? You don't know that she will not hate you either. A divorce is the end of a romantic relationship, which end all the time. That's it. It's not a failure or a sentence of doom. That plus the…
/r/MensRights23/08/21 08:50 AM
3

So just because I didn't explicitly answer your question you made the assumption that I think all women hate men. It didn't even occur to me that I had to specifically answer it because: I thought the answer was obvious. No rational man with even half a brain believes that ALL women hate men. It had nothing to do with the point I made. I just stated that nearly 50% of marriages end in divorce and whether all women hate men or not is irrelevant and does not change that FACT about divorce. Denying…
/r/MensRights23/08/21 08:10 AM
2

If you know the parachute had a 50% chance of failing, you would know more than 0.00000001% about the behaviour of parachutes. Also, a divorce doesn't say anything about the behaviour of women which is what your post implies. It's a fact that nearly 50% of marriages end in divorce and men almost always get fucked in divorces. I don't know what point you're trying to make by saying that I don't know about the behaviour of women. Facts are facts regardless of what behaviour someone has. Also, how …
/r/MensRights23/08/21 07:20 AM
2

Here take this parachute which has a 50% chance of failing and go skydiving. Don't wanna do it? Well, sounds like you believe all parachutes are broken! You know only 0.0000001% about the behavior of parachutes. I once went skydiving and I didn't die. It's not fiction. Just don't deny yourself joyous life experiences because of a bad faith assumption. EDIT: Whoever downvoted my reply clearly didn't read the comment I was replying to and didn't realize that I was just repeating what the guy above…
/r/MensRights23/08/21 05:51 AM
6

Every man ever who got annihilated through marriage thought he was marrying the right woman or else he wouldn't have married her in the first place but that didn't save him. Nearly half of the marriages end in divorce and men almost always get fucked in a divorce. That alone is reason enough to not get married. I would never gamble my life on a coin flip simply because "not all women hate men".
/r/MensRights23/08/21 05:25 AM
4

I remember seeing one talk about how she was going to consistently make money every month for decades. They seem to think onlyfans is some machine which creates money out of thin air.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/08/21 04:48 AM
27

The post talks about how men were killed at much higher rates than women and you're saying under the taliban, men are treated much better, as most of their radical ideals regarding gender harm women much more then they harm men Do you even think before typing? Or maybe you think men's deaths don't matter so you just ignore them and only see the bad things happening to women.
/r/MensRights18/08/21 04:59 AM
22

Men are literally being killed at much higher rates than women and you're acting like "women most affected" because they got raped.
/r/MensRights18/08/21 04:54 AM
3

It's 2.7% not 27%.
/r/MensRights16/08/21 02:46 AM
7

I didn't imply that women had no problems. May be I should have worded that better. I just had a problem with the blanket generalized claim that "women had it rough" because it is just as stupid as the feminists today who claim "women are oppressed" simply because one portion of women living in some parts of the world face problems, even if those problems are gender-related.
/r/MensRights15/08/21 05:18 AM
5

It's the same problem I have with feminists today who use the problems faced by women in some remote rural areas to claim "women are oppressed" despite western women living the most comfortable and easiest lives in the history of humanity.
/r/MensRights15/08/21 05:09 AM
7

Okay but where did I say that men and women had the exact same problems? I don't even know what you're arguing about here. I'm saying don't say "women had it rough" as if it was just women who struggled or as if women in general struggled simply because they were women. Women belonging to the middle class and above had completely different and 100x times easier lives than both women and men from poor families and backward castes. EDIT: It's the same problem I have with feminists today who use th…
/r/MensRights15/08/21 04:50 AM
7

I think you missed the whole point of my original comment. I was saying it's not that "women had a rough history" but people in general had a rough history depending on their socioeconomic status because of India being a poor corrupt third world country.
/r/MensRights15/08/21 04:40 AM
7

Are you saying women struggled more than men?
/r/MensRights15/08/21 04:33 AM
6

It has always been and still is a rough place if you are poor regardless of your gender.
/r/MensRights15/08/21 04:29 AM
9

Are you saying only women had a rough history while men had smooth easy lives?
/r/MensRights15/08/21 03:55 AM
3

If you're considering getting married, especially in India, please first go to my post history and read the post (not comments) I made in this sub.
/r/MensRights15/08/21 02:35 AM
8

India is not a rough place for women and never was even in the past. It has always been and still is a rough place if you are poor regardless of your gender. Read the posts (not comments) in my post history if you want to know more. And the reason they have separate bus seats and train sections for women is not because of harassment or anything like that. It's because India is extremely crowded and therefore it's very hard to find a seat in public transport. So they reserve some seats for women …
/r/MensRights15/08/21 02:33 AM
2

Like I said in my post, it is a horrible place for women (and men) if they are poor and it's because of their lack of wealth and not because of their gender. Women belonging to the middle class and above live very comfortable and easy lives. The only group which is suffering because of their gender is men as I explained in my post.
/r/MensRights08/08/21 03:24 AM
10

I agree. The irony is that even women were happier back then living that way. Now they've been brainwashed by feminism into believing that being a wage slave (stronk independent career whamyn) is empowering. They're realizing after hitting 40 that they don't want to work themselves to death and would rather be SAHM instead but it's already too late. I mean who would want to work 40+ hours a week when you can just stay at home and be with the kids and have your needs taken care of by someone else…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/08/21 01:35 PM
8

The people trying to get this sub banned will spin this into "mysogynistic incel fetishises that women should be submissive servants who belong in the kitchen". Not even kidding.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/08/21 11:35 AM
2

They don't even bother to defend fellow men because most men here have an incredibly simp mindset and if they see a woman and a man fighting, they will automatically assume the man must've done something wrong and will cheer for the woman for being brave.
/r/MensRights05/08/21 08:54 AM
62

Because if men are single then women can't leech off of them like parasites and will have to actually be strong and independent like they claim they are and pay their own bills.
/r/MensRights05/08/21 04:19 AM
30

Right and whenever you bring up men's issues anywhere you get name-called and attacked for "wanting to take away women's rights" or some other made-up bs which doesn't even make sense.
/r/MensRights05/08/21 04:13 AM
1

And they're not "perceived" inconsistencies. You literally said one thing and then the opposite thing some time later. You are playing so much mental gymnastics you can't even stick to what you yourself are saying.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 08:42 PM
1

Incredibly ironic that you're saying you want an open minded discussion considering your behavior these last few hours. Like when you said that the reservation system wasn't even real and when you said that men are not discriminated. Wow so open minded. I AM engaging with your points. That doesn't mean I have to agree with your points even if they are bullshit and of course I'm going to pick them apart. I too am not interested in having a conversation with someone who will bend over backwards to…
/r/MensRights04/08/21 08:36 PM
2

I don't recommend visiting it either. There are better alternatives for a vacation.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 07:42 PM
1

Also didn't you say just earlier that the discrimination against men is justified? But now you're saying men are not discriminated against? Nice logic. Also it's past midnight where I live, so going to continue this tomorrow. See you in a few hours.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 07:38 PM
1

Lol you say men are not discriminated against even though I literally explained to you in great detail over the last few hours how men are discriminated against. a little bit of Googling brings up a myriad of studies and articles showing the gender discrimination women face every day worldwide So? Did I say women face zero discrimination? A blind defense of the opposite position is why it remains a global problem A blind refusal to acknowledge that men are discriminated against too is why it rem…
/r/MensRights04/08/21 07:35 PM
1

Btw, I am fully aware that you're never going to admit that men are systematically discriminated against too and that it is not justified and that discrimination against men is not the solution to discrimination against women. But I will keep defending my point until I die.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 07:13 PM
1

women are systematically discriminated against based on their gender regardless of their wealth or social status Just like how men are systematically discriminated against based on their gender regardless of their wealth or social status? The solution to discrimination against one group is to discriminate against the other group. Arguing that a person should get a job because they’re poorer than another applicant doesn’t meet the merits test either Did I say that poor people should get special t…
/r/MensRights04/08/21 06:44 PM
1

The main problem is that gender reservation applies a blanket assumption that all women are backward and all men are privileged and therefore provides job reservation to all women regardless of their status or wealth. So even a guy who is living below the poverty line is skipped over for a woman who comes from a well-off family and lives a luxurious life. This is obviously bullshit and the government should instead focus on providing equal opportunities to everyone and removing any barriers base…
/r/MensRights04/08/21 06:36 PM
1

Definitely not by discriminating against men. If one is bad then the other is also just as bad.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 06:25 PM
1

You shared an article saying "why quotas work for gender equality" and spoke like you supported it because the current rate of change is too slow or something like that. So obviously it implies that you want quotas until things improve or something. And the people who are benefited by a policy will obviously want it to stay, even if it is at the expense of others. That doesn't automatically mean it's right. Majority of the voters in USA owned slaves and wanted slavery to be legal at one point.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 06:22 PM
1

Oh nevermind, you're saying that it's okay because the discrimination is justified. First you said you didn't like quotas, then you shared that article and said you wanted quotas, then you said the system was not real and men were not discriminated against, now you're saying that discrimination is justified. Also I like how you said caste reservation will include "men" of minority groups. It literally includes both men and women and gender makes zero difference which is why I didn't bring up cas…
/r/MensRights04/08/21 05:22 PM
2

Btw, you seem to be looking at the SC/ST reservation which is based on caste. There is also gender based reservation which you can find if you scroll down. Together, caste and gender reservations make up 70-90 percent of the jobs depending on the state.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 04:58 PM
2

The fact that the system is so ridiculous that you can't even believe it's real speaks volumes. This is not a contest to see who is the most discriminated. I'm saying that men are discriminated too like I explained above. You refusing to admit that that's how the system works and saying that I, a guy who's lived here for 30 years and seen it all first-hand, don't know what I'm talking about is not going to make the system not real.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 04:42 PM
1

Here is the wikipedia article. They call it "reservation" like "reserving" a seat on a train by buying a ticket. The government has "reserved" 33% of jobs for women only and the remaining jobs are for everyone.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 04:34 PM
1

LMAO! Please, just stop. Now you're just being in denial. It's okay to admit that men face discrimination too. May be quotas work differently in other places but here in India it's called "reservation" and that's exactly how it works. You can look it up if you don't believe me.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 04:30 PM
1

It's like a gym having a female-only section and a common section. Even if the common section is being used by only women, they won't allow a man to enter the female-only section. It's for females only.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 04:11 PM
1

No, that's not how it works. Trust me, I literally live here and I know how it works. The rule is that 33% of jobs are given to women ONLY and the other 66% are distributed naturally according to the ranks. It doesn't matter even if all the first 66% jobs are won by women. The remaining 33% will still go to women only.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 04:10 PM
1

Okay you seem to be not understanding the situation so I'll explain it with an example. There is an exam here which is held every year and based on the scores in that exam, people are chosen for govt. and public sector jobs. Imagine there are 3 jobs and 5 people who wrote the exam and they got ranked like this based on their scores. Man (rank 1) Woman (rank 2) Man (rank 3) Woman (rank 4) Man (rank 5) Now the first two jobs will go to the Man (rank 1) and Woman (rank 2). Now the third job MUST go…
/r/MensRights04/08/21 03:59 PM
1

I am fixated on quotas because this whole conversation began because of quotas. as a man you benefit from the system remaining as it is I literally mentioned multiple times how men who score much higher and are more competent lose jobs to women because the remaining 33% of the jobs have to be filled by women only even if there are more qualified men available but you're conveniently ignoring that and saying men benefit from the system.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 03:13 PM
1

Why quotas work for gender equality Didn't you just say earlier that you don't want quotas?
/r/MensRights04/08/21 02:50 PM
1

Yes, there should be equal opportunities for everyone with no stigmas or pressures or discrimination or quotas which is what I too have been saying from the start. And we will obviously never reach that point as long as quotas exist. If we're going to fight to eliminate the other things like societal pressure then quotas too must be removed.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 02:47 PM
1

When women were not allowed to vote in the past, someone in power made that law because they too thought it was necessary. Just because someone in power decides something that doesn't mean they're right. You say you don't know about India but I do. It's the men who are discriminated against, especially in the govt. and public sector jobs, not women. When someone with a rank of 4,000 loses his job to someone with a rank of 40,000 because of his gender, he is the one who is discriminated against. …
/r/MensRights04/08/21 02:44 PM
1

The answer to that question matters because if there are inherent differences between men and women and their preferences and the choices they make, especially due to the 200,000 years of evolution, then the number of women and men in professions will never be equal even in a perfect society. It also means that simply because women are underrepresented in certain profession, you can't automatically claim discrimination and you have to consider the fact that it might be because women are less int…
/r/MensRights04/08/21 02:38 PM
1

Then what should we do about the female quotas which currently exist?
/r/MensRights04/08/21 02:36 PM
1

And you're also saying that until we reach that "equal society", it is justified to have female quotas. Am I correct?
/r/MensRights04/08/21 02:33 PM
1

You're saying you don't like quotas and we should have an equal society where there is no need for quotas. Am I correct?
/r/MensRights04/08/21 02:32 PM
1

You're saying women need quotas until there is equality. But there are no quotas for men even though there is no equality for them either. They too lose jobs simply because of the fact that they're male.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 02:24 PM
1

I copy pasted exactly what you said. You literally said "there is no reason why there WOULDN'T be equal numbers". So I'll ask you again. Do you think in an perfectly ideal society with no discrimination there WILL be equal numbers or no?
/r/MensRights04/08/21 02:22 PM
1

Well your argument basically boils down to "women need quotas because they're discriminated against more" even though there are literally thousands of men in India who lose jobs every year to women who score far lower than they do due to those same quotas.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 02:20 PM
1

so if it’s not just heavy lifting then there’s no reason why there wouldn’t be equal numbers. This is why I'm asking.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 02:13 PM
1

It matters because you said if everything was ideal with no sexism or discrimination then there'd no disparity in any profession.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 02:09 PM
1

Nurses will never be paid the same as doctors for obvious reasons. Also you're basically saying that when women are underrepresented it's because of misogyny, etc and when men are underrepresented it's because they themselves don't want it. Men too face misandry and discrimination and have barriers to entry. If you really cared about equality then you'd be supporting quotas for men just as much as quotas for women.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 02:08 PM
1

That's not what I'm asking. I'm asking if both groups have the same choices and infrastructure are they going to MAKE the exact same choices resulting in zero disparity in any profession?
/r/MensRights04/08/21 01:56 PM
1

If men are stigmatized against the caring sector and are paid less and therefore underrepresented in that sector isn't that justification to have male quotas according to your logic?
/r/MensRights04/08/21 01:53 PM
1

So you think there are literally no differences between men and women (not intelligence or physical attributes but preferences, etc) if you take away sexism, etc. Both groups are going to make the exact same choices and behave exactly the same?
/r/MensRights04/08/21 01:48 PM
1

Do you think in all professions where men are underrepresented it's because men don't want those jobs and in all professions where women are underrepresented it's because they are being discriminated against?
/r/MensRights04/08/21 01:38 PM
1

Then the solution is not to have quotas but to give everyone equal opportunity which you also seem to agree with. Btw there will always be a disparity in the number of men and women entering a profession because women and men are different. Do you really think women will be working in mines at the same rate as men when everything is truly equal?
/r/MensRights04/08/21 01:34 PM
1

If an employer refuses to employ a particular group isn't that literally illegal? Why is there a need to have quotas to force them to hire someone. Also what if they can't find enough competent people to fill the quota? And what if someone who is not of a reserved quota loses his spot to someone else from a quota despite being more qualified? This literally happens all the time here in India. Like someone who ranks 40,000 in a test is hired over someone who ranks 4000 because of the quotas.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 01:25 PM
1

Oh nevermind. I got confused with the other reply.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 01:19 PM
1

But how can you claim that you want equality and that women are equal to men while saying women won't do tough jobs and only want comfortable jobs?
/r/MensRights04/08/21 01:16 PM
1

So your solution to fight discrimination is more discrimination.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 01:08 PM
1

And also women never ask for quotas in working in mining and oil rigs. You want quotas only when it's convenient.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 01:07 PM
1

Funny because I never see anyone fight for quotas for men in sectors like healthcare and teaching where men are underrepresented.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 01:05 PM
1

Nobody should be trying to recruit any particular "group" in the first place. People should be hired based on merit and not gender.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 12:44 PM
1

No, the 66% are for both men and women whereas 33% are for women only. It's like a restaurant having 3 restrooms where 2 of them can be used by both genders but one of them can be used by women only.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 12:41 PM
2

No, dumbass. The other 66% are not reserved for men. They're for both men and women whereas 33% are for women only.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 12:38 PM
2

Indians themselves leave India behind. The brightest minds of the country often leave to other countries where they are actually appreciated and respected more.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 10:09 AM
10

I agree. Stop using reddit and organize a migration to a different platform while we still have the chance.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 10:04 AM
3

I edited the post a little and posted again. Seems like it's not getting removed this time.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 06:13 AM
2

No idea, I didn't even get an explanation. Just shadow-removed.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 04:12 AM
2

Please share it.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 03:24 AM
6

It didn't let me crosspost so I reposted it. EDIT: Instantly removed by mods. So much for being TRUE off my chest.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 02:16 AM
7

I forgot to include it in my post but universities here also have girls-only hiring drives where companies come to hire and boys are not allowed to apply or interview. It's not even subtle but you get called an incel when you say that companies discriminate against men.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 12:34 AM
5

The difference is, the kind of guys who stare are often ignorant to the fact that you're not supposed to stare. It's like someone who smells but doesn't know that he smells. But that's usually the extent of their misbehavior. Most of them are too scared to approach a woman, which is why they stare from a distance and would never harass or rape someone. Coming to the point about being entitled and tipping the least, it's not because they're sexist but because it's common in Indian society to be r…
/r/MensRights04/08/21 12:24 AM
2

And yet absolutely nothing will happen to her just like that zomato incident.
/r/MensRights03/08/21 08:00 AM
3

They're definitely lying. It's just too convenient that they're bringing it up now during the Olympics even though it supposedly happened in 2015.
/r/MensRights01/08/21 04:35 PM
57

Virtue signalling is more important to them than victory.
/r/MensRights01/08/21 04:32 PM
6

And yet they act as if they're oppressed.
/r/MGTOW30/07/21 03:29 AM
11

Try to get out of this fucking shithole if possible. That's what I'm going to do soon. I'd rather fucking die than pay tax to a government which so heavily treats men like garbage and gives free shit to women just so that they can falsely accuse me of rape and ruin my life.
/r/MGTOW18/07/21 05:11 AM
2

Just from reading the title, I had a feeling it was going to be India... aaaaaand yes it was.
/r/MGTOW18/07/21 05:08 AM
2

Unfortunately it doesn't matter whether it's violence, rape or harassment. False accusers face no consequences. It's super rare that a false accuser gets arrested and even when they do get arrested they are let go with almost no punishment. I'm sure you know about the Jasleen Kaur case too which happened a few years ago. She falsely accused him of sexual harassment and even after the court decided that he was innocent that bitch got no punishment. She didn't even attend the court hearings and se…
/r/MGTOW21/06/21 02:05 PM
9

Not in our country brother. I remember reading about a case where a guy fought a false rape case for 4 or 5 years and when he finally won, all the woman got was a tiny fine of a few thousand rupees. Even in that zomato case, the guy who got falsely accused filed a case against her but even to this day she's faced zero legal consequences even though the cops arrested the zomato guy within 24 hours when he was first accused and even lost his job. The only reason his life isn't completely ruined is…
/r/MGTOW21/06/21 01:31 PM
15

Well there are no legal consequences to false allegations, at least in India. In the worst case scenario they will get a slap on the wrist but even that is pretty rare.
/r/MGTOW21/06/21 11:31 AM
3

Based.
/r/MGTOW29/04/21 04:13 AM
5

It's actually pretty common and happens all the time. There's a law in India where a wife can report the husband along with ANYONE in his family for domestic violence/harassment and all of them will be arrested. There are cases where even toddlers were arrested this way.
/r/MGTOW17/04/21 10:49 AM
5

Well in this case it's game over for you even if your brother gets married (something which you have no control over). Men are reduced to nothing but workhorses.
/r/MGTOW17/04/21 10:46 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter