| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A study suggesting that circumcision can reduce sensation and pleasure. It’s small so not conclusive, but it certainly points in that direction.You could round up 100 cut men and tell them they feel nothing during sex and they will laugh at you and tell you you don't know what you're talking about. You could tell those same 100 men that they must have ED and again they will laugh at you. How many guys are going to be upfront and honest about being sexually dysfunctional when you approach them in person? Your opinion is not based on reality, it's based on whatever issue you have and is not a factual representation of the populace. You're… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 28/02/20 02:10 AM |
| 1 | A study suggesting that circumcision can reduce sensation and pleasure. It’s small so not conclusive, but it certainly points in that direction.Also, this is obviously an alt account. Why would I use an account that could be linked to my actual identity to talk about having sexual dysfunction? Can you not comprehend how emasculating and humiliating that would be? | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 27/02/20 01:57 AM |
| 1 | A study suggesting that circumcision can reduce sensation and pleasure. It’s small so not conclusive, but it certainly points in that direction.You're not absorbing anything I'm saying. This is a waste of time. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 27/02/20 12:31 AM |
| 1 | A study suggesting that circumcision can reduce sensation and pleasure. It’s small so not conclusive, but it certainly points in that direction.Most of those men you described who cant orgasm once did so with ease when they were younger. The men I'm talking about were young. There are men in their early 20s who have ED because they have next to no sensation in their penises. The US is the world's biggest consumer of Viagra for a reason. Also your ideas about lubrication also assume that the issue solely resides on men being circumcised, while female lubrication is not under mens control. What does female lubrication have to do with men … | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 25/02/20 11:49 PM |
| 1 | A study suggesting that circumcision can reduce sensation and pleasure. It’s small so not conclusive, but it certainly points in that direction.so in your opinion men who are circumcised feel nothing until orgasm Not quite nothing, more like next to nothing with some variance because of multiple factors. There are many men who find it next to impossible to orgasm during sex not because of any fault of their own but because the neurological tools intended for the job have been largely taken away from them. I have personally suffered extensively from tight, immobile shaft skin and a lack of sensation and I have known many other men who ha… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 25/02/20 07:12 AM |
| 1 | A study suggesting that circumcision can reduce sensation and pleasure. It’s small so not conclusive, but it certainly points in that direction.The human body is an incredible machine and if circumcision was as detrimental to penile sensation as many argue then the practice would have died soon after it began. Circumcision generally doesn't render a man incapable of the basic act of reproduction, so I don't think that's really an accurate statement. American men think it's normal to have to use artificial lubricant to masturbate and to not feel anything during sex until they ejaculate. Most discussions about sex among American men cente… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 25/02/20 04:26 AM |
| 1 | A study suggesting that circumcision can reduce sensation and pleasure. It’s small so not conclusive, but it certainly points in that direction.Yeah, that's one of many subs that get downright Orwellian about this topic. r/medicine is another one. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 25/02/20 12:30 AM |
| 1 | Boys scream in pain as they are circumcised with NO anaesthetic in TurkeyAposthia? Wow, that's an incredibly rare defect. Depending on what your parents intended on doing, you may have lucked out. | /r/MensRights | 11/10/19 06:54 PM |
| 0 | Guys my dad was on tv 😳https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06685.x "The glans of the circumcised penis is less sensitive to fine touch than the glans of the uncircumcised penis. The transitional region from the external to the internal prepuce is the most sensitive region of the uncircumcised penis and more sensitive than the most sensitive region of the circumcised penis. Circumcision ablates the most sensitive parts of the penis." | /r/MensRights | 27/09/19 12:30 PM |
| 1 | Guys my dad was on tv 😳How is it dumb to be opposed to and speak out about men routinely sexually mutilated against their will? What are you even doing on a men's rights sub if a man's autonomy isn't important to you? | /r/MensRights | 27/09/19 12:23 PM |
| 0 | Guys my dad was on tv 😳That's just idiotic. You're missing the most sensitive part of your penis for life. | /r/MensRights | 27/09/19 12:22 PM |
| 0 | Guys my dad was on tv 😳It's not a "piece of skin", it's a double layer of tissue that contains the five most sensitive parts of the penis. You are missing most of the sensation of your penis, period. | /r/MensRights | 27/09/19 12:21 PM |
| 1 | Guys my dad was on tv 😳It's not "extra" when every man is born with it. | /r/MensRights | 27/09/19 04:04 AM |
| 0 | Guys my dad was on tv 😳I have full sensation everywhere. Impossible when you don't have all the parts. | /r/MensRights | 27/09/19 04:04 AM |
| 1 | Guys my dad was on tv 😳Doctors in every other developed country disagree with you and the bullshit your worthless American medical school fed you. | /r/MensRights | 27/09/19 04:02 AM |
| 1 | Guys my dad was on tv 😳Also none of the men I know have ever voiced being upset about circumcision What do any of them know about the foreskin? | /r/MensRights | 27/09/19 04:00 AM |
| 1 | Guys my dad was on tv 😳weird to think people would want foreskin that badly. Weird to think people would want to have non-mutilated genitalia and normal sexual functioning? | /r/MensRights | 27/09/19 03:55 AM |
| 0 | Guys my dad was on tv 😳I would’ve been angry if I wasn’t Why would you have been angry NOT to have a part of your penis cut off? | /r/MensRights | 27/09/19 03:54 AM |
| 1 | Guys my dad was on tv 😳and most chicks don't like anyway You're a moron. Most men in the world are not mutilated and their women like them just fine. | /r/MensRights | 27/09/19 03:54 AM |
| 4 | Man, I mostly disagree with you guys, on account of 'having a penis is awesome', but its hard to follow such a closed off world as 3rd wave feminism.If you don't own your own body, you don't own anything. | /r/MensRights | 29/08/19 11:51 AM |
| 8 | Circumcision is literally legal genital mutilation.Why is it that not all men complain after their circumcision [...] But why the fuck are most men living and dying without ANY complaints WHATSOEVER associated with their circumcision. Most cut men don't know anything about circumcision or the foreskin and the more they know, the less likely they are to be satisfied with their cut status. | /r/MensRights | 25/08/19 02:19 PM |
| 6 | Circumcision is literally legal genital mutilation.You can't tell me a guy with a normal cut dick is worse off There's no such thing as a "normal cut dick" no more than there is such a thing a "normal hand missing fingertips". So let us keep our freedoms intact please. If you can have part of your cock cut off without your consent, you don't have freedom. | /r/MensRights | 25/08/19 02:16 PM |
| 1 | Saw this on another sub thought it belongs hereIt's not difficult. If it's difficult to pull back the foreskin, there's a problem. | /r/MensRights | 07/08/19 05:55 PM |
| 1 | Saw this on another sub thought it belongs hereThere is nothing special or complicated about cleaning an intact penis. A few seconds in a shower running warm water over the genitals is enough. As far as premature retraction goes, that's not a "con" of having a foreskin so much as it is a statement about the lack of anatomy education. | /r/MensRights | 07/08/19 04:34 PM |
| 1 | Saw this on another sub thought it belongs hereWell when you say most sensitive do you mean like it’s more pleasurable? The foreskin contains almost all of the fine touch receptors of the penis, the same sort of nerves that are found in your fingertips, palms, and lips. Sexual pleasure is a complex animal but I would speculate that such a highly sensitive part of the penis would play a significant role in providing adequate sexual stimulation. Also the way I see it the tissue is unneeded am I correct? Many of our body parts are not needed, b… | /r/MensRights | 07/08/19 04:24 PM |
| 1 | Saw this on another sub thought it belongs hereThe foreskin is the most sensitive part of the penis and makes up most of the tissue on the penis. I can't imagine why you wouldn't want to have that. | /r/MensRights | 07/08/19 04:12 PM |
| 1 | One day, American men will figure out that being heinously genitally mutilated at birth was not a good thing...Nobody cares what their dad's dick looks like. Sorry, but you are absolutely fucking ridiculous. | /r/MensRights | 06/07/19 11:00 PM |
| 0 | One day, American men will figure out that being heinously genitally mutilated at birth was not a good thing...No, they aren't. There are hundreds of accounts of these very things happening. | /r/MensRights | 06/07/19 10:30 PM |
| -1 | One day, American men will figure out that being heinously genitally mutilated at birth was not a good thing...It used to be up until the 80s, and even now if you say "no", nurses will coerce you and even try to take your baby away to do it while you aren't looking. | /r/MensRights | 06/07/19 10:05 PM |
| 1 | One day, American men will figure out that being heinously genitally mutilated at birth was not a good thing...Except, circumcision isn't mandatory here. It used to be. Parents had absolutely no choice from the 30s up until the 80s. If you had a boy in an American hospital during that time period, they would do it regardless of whether or not you gave the go ahead, and there are stories of doctors basically saying that parents could not legally leave the hospital without doing it and all kinds of insane shit. | /r/MensRights | 06/07/19 09:57 PM |
| 12 | Mom 'enraged' she can't find a doctor willing to perform a circumcision on her infant sonAnd no medical organization outside of the US supports it. | /r/MensRights | 24/06/19 09:53 PM |
| 17 | Mom 'enraged' she can't find a doctor willing to perform a circumcision on her infant sonThe Mayo Clinic published a paper by Brian Morris who is a literal circumcision fetishist who has no authority on anything other than perversion. | /r/MensRights | 24/06/19 09:10 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter