TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Shawn411 Archive

View 1 post and 108 comments by Shawn411 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
23

FeminismShawn411/r/MensRights13/06/19 02:54 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

The difference between abortion and vaccines is that, one, you are putting others at risk (mainly the immunocompromised) by not getting the vaccine. And two, you are taking part in allowing the virus to continue to mutate, resulting in more variants, and ultimately dragging on the pandemic for everyone. Abortion has none of these effects.
/r/MensRights08/04/22 12:16 PM
6

My guy he literally said the law was wrong in the comment you replied to.
/r/MensRights25/08/20 03:25 PM
1

Hopefully that is the case, that it's an issue of not doing enough follow up.
/r/MensRights27/04/20 11:51 AM
0

I'll admit it's not a hard statistic, more most of the time when you see this sort of article the perpetrator gets of scott free.
/r/MensRights27/04/20 11:43 AM
2

Source? Also how he explained it is how this sort of thing goes most of the time.
/r/MensRights27/04/20 11:32 AM
1

You can do both
/r/MensRights24/03/20 05:09 PM
1

Are you alright? Because you're reading words that aren't actually being written. No one said the punishment should be different. He wasn't blaming the victim. He was saying in hindsight he could have taken actions that may have prevented that. He never said it was his fault.
/r/MensRights24/03/20 04:22 PM
-4

Yeah. This kind of thing is exactly what we should be fighting against. Not supporting.
/r/MensRights23/03/20 06:52 PM
-19

Yeah it makes no difference. You probably shouldn't approach people who are freaking out regardless of gender. The guy who said that wasn't justifying her actions. Don't be so quick to jump on people for being logical.
/r/MensRights23/03/20 06:47 PM
-9

He wasn't excusing her? If there's an active shooter in a building, you run away from the gunfire, not towards it. That doesn't excuse the shooter for shooting you, but you could've done things smarter. Same applies here.
/r/MensRights23/03/20 06:44 PM
4

Ah a fellow man of culture.
/r/MensRights01/03/20 12:03 PM
1

Toxic masculinity basically refers to men telling other men that kind of thing, which unfortunately does happen. Like when you see an article about a female child rapist, you do frequently see men saying things like, "where was she when I was 13," and various other similar statements. That is what toxic masculinity is supposed to refer to. Though the term like most things unfortunately ends up being misused.
/r/MensRights01/03/20 01:19 AM
7

She was literally holdig onto him and hitting him. He used the amount of force nessesary to put a stop to that. It's very clear he was perfectly in the right here. If he'd get a battery charge for that then the law itself needs to be reevaluated.
/r/MensRights23/02/20 10:14 PM
5

Ever hear if self defense? It's legal in most civilized countries.
/r/MensRights23/02/20 08:21 PM
7

I'd provide sources myself but I'm at work and can't go digging for them, but I'd recommend doing some research into it.
/r/MensRights06/02/20 04:29 PM
23

Plenty of soueces in other comments but it basically leads to a bunch of consequences later in life including high risk of erectile dysfunction.
/r/MensRights06/02/20 03:55 PM
17

But it is related. Either way, a child should not be circumcised unless there is a legitimate MEDICAL reason for it. "Overall cleanliness," is not one of them. The foreskin, as those who have them would know, can be pulled back for cleaning. There is no advantage offered by circumcision there. As for disadvantages, botched circumcisions can be extremely painful for the victim later in life. And even proper circumcisions lead to less sensitivity in the penis which is an obvious issue when it come…
/r/MensRights12/01/20 11:38 PM
3

I'm gonna need a source for that. Like I can see it happeninng, but at the same it's a little bit too wack to not need a source.
/r/MensRights12/01/20 11:29 PM
2

That's pushing it by a lot.
/r/MensRights09/01/20 06:45 PM
6

Bruh 35 bruises isn't rough sex. It's a beating.
/r/MensRights09/01/20 06:41 PM
20

Hey newsflash. Gay people don't want sex from every man on the planet.
/r/MensRights06/01/20 08:56 PM
8

I mean I'd argue that being against circumcision is progressive but alright.
/r/MensRights22/12/19 12:42 AM
8

I mean I'm definitely not a professional by any means. But there are reuptake medications you could possibly try, while they don't increase supply they do keep in in the body for longer, which may help at least to a degree. I'd go to a doctor and ask about it or if there are any other kinds of medications for it. Maybe there are medications I'm not aware of that do stimulate serotonin production. It's worth a shot.
/r/MensRights10/12/19 02:14 PM
39

My guy there's nothing wrong with getting medication. Do what you need to do to get better. I have a number of family members whose conditions with mental illness have improved with the help of medication.
/r/MensRights10/12/19 01:59 PM
1

As the other guy said, if you can't pull any meaning out of that post other than the mild insult, then you really should be polishing up your communication skills. They seem rather lacking and I say that more out of concern for you rather than to insult you.
/r/MensRights04/12/19 05:33 PM
3

It really isn't hard to tell that a person is 10 years old, (or at least has the maturity level of a 10 year old), when they respond to a perfectly logical argument with, "lol."
/r/MensRights04/12/19 05:21 PM
1

Even if it is satirical. The fact that the things described can in fact be done is quite frankly terrifying.
/r/MensRights04/12/19 11:32 AM
30

You'll probably be the one arrested tbh
/r/MensRights24/11/19 02:51 AM
2

She's literally correct.
/r/MensRights18/11/19 12:32 AM
2

No? The post I'm referring to never said that.
/r/MensRights07/11/19 11:23 PM
-11

Except that's not even remotely what I'm saying. And yeah, people have preferences. There's no problem with that.
/r/MensRights07/11/19 03:26 PM
2

I agree with what you say aside from the last sentence. Both genders have their own issues that they deal with. Though I'm not sure why you're bringing this up as we're on a completely different topic.
/r/MensRights07/11/19 03:19 PM
-24

I will admit that I have not been there personally. Which is why I said it sounds incelish, rather than calling him a full blown incel. That's an argument they use a lot.
/r/MensRights07/11/19 01:47 PM
-309

Ngl it does sound a little bit incelish. People are allowed to have preferences. Of course there is an issue of men being shamed for that, but that doesn't mean we should do the same.
/r/MensRights07/11/19 11:25 AM
0

Ah yes. Let's ask the person with a knife to my throat to let go before doing something about it. That's equally stupid. Some situations require you to act first. I highly doubt you'd be asking questions if you saw some stranger trying to take your kid somewhere.
/r/MensRights01/11/19 01:22 AM
-3

You did not answer the question. The guy tried to help someone and could face charges for that? That's begging for a world of selfishness.
/r/MensRights01/11/19 01:20 AM
-1

So if someone seems to be in danger, and you can do something to stop it immediately, you'll just ignore it? I question the morality of that. Yeah he did something technically illegal. But anyone with half a brain can see he was trying to do the right thing and protect someone.
/r/MensRights01/11/19 01:15 AM
-4

Honestly I get where the guys coming from. He thought someone was in danger and acted according to that. He's likely just as much of a victim as the accused.
/r/MensRights01/11/19 01:12 AM
0

Why does that matter?
/r/MensRights27/10/19 05:33 PM
0

So what? This has literally nothing to do with the post.
/r/MensRights27/10/19 05:31 PM
0

Your comment does more harm than good to our own cause.
/r/MensRights27/10/19 05:30 PM
2

Exactly. Honestly saying Islam is doinn thing's right is more detrimental to our own cause than anything.
/r/MensRights27/10/19 05:30 PM
0

Christianity's no better. They worship someone who commits genocide when he doesn't get his way.
/r/MensRights27/10/19 05:28 PM
1

Good bot
/r/MensRights27/10/19 05:23 PM
4

I didn't know I was on gendercritical... how did this happen?
/r/MensRights27/10/19 05:21 PM
2

Nah, that whole subreddit's fucked
/r/MensRights23/10/19 07:27 PM
0

I want to see this happen. Just so I can see how they react.
/r/MensRights23/10/19 07:26 PM
31

They reeaally hate trans people. I don't get it. Like. Let people be what they wanna be. We shouldn't even care about gender outside of when there might be some sort of risk involved, like in sports. And, obviously relationships.
/r/MensRights23/10/19 06:47 PM
15

Happy cake day. And yeah that was the first think I noticed. So many of these things ready have words. It's like they changed them to target these groups negatively. Using "Cis-Genderism" as a sibstitute for transphobia, just seems like they're trying to say all non-trans people are bad.
/r/MensRights10/10/19 11:23 AM
34

Like I'm all for teaching kids about racism and sexism and all that. But don't leave shit out or blatantly lie to further some bullshit agenda like whoever put this together.
/r/MensRights10/10/19 11:19 AM
1

Get the puck of the ice!
/r/MensRights09/10/19 12:23 PM
-1

Man they're in 6th grade. This is highly unlikely to affect them in the future. They certainly wouldn't be hauled off to jail. In any civilized country anyway. Obviously what she did was wrong. But this is reaching just a bit.
/r/MensRights01/10/19 06:29 AM
3

Woah. Getting some weird vibes from this guy.
/r/MensRights28/08/19 09:25 AM
1

Your general idea at first makes sense But you lost me at Either women are incompetent and can't manage to figure out how to kill themselves, or most female suicide attempts are really just attempts to get attention. This is blatant, hate filled, incel levels of sexism. Attention seekers exist, yes. But to say that mosy women who attempt suicide based soley on the method is disgusting, and baseless given that plently of people, including men, have died from overdoses.
/r/MensRights27/08/19 07:18 AM
1

Sorry but criticizing someone who calls suicide survivors attention seekers is not feminism or trolling. It's just basic human decency. OP is tue very thing causing people to hate this movement.
/r/MensRights27/08/19 06:45 AM
4

No, because someone wanting to fund prostate cancer probably isn't shitting on women who suffer from breast cancer, like you are with women who attempt suicide.
/r/MensRights27/08/19 06:41 AM
1

Those are obviously problems, but calling most female suicide attempts attention seeking is beyond shitty, and makes people think pretty damn badly of this movement. You sound like a literal incel and I suggest you reconsider your opinions on this.
/r/MensRights27/08/19 06:35 AM
7

Full on capitalism has some pretty glaring issues. Communism on paper is supposed to fix those issues, however the system is extremely easy to abuse, and generally too extreme in it's execution. The best option is something in the middle.
/r/MensRights30/07/19 10:18 AM
3

It's people like you that give MRAs a a bad name.
/r/MensRights26/07/19 07:56 PM
10

Incel alert!
/r/MensRights26/07/19 05:29 PM
2

Yeah, I hear ya. Both sides of this whole gender equality thing seem to be a bit closed minded unfortunately.
/r/MensRights22/06/19 03:41 PM
0

You're correct unfortunately. And being downvoted as well. This comment is just fuel for those who hate MRAs. It's not that hard to not look anyway. It's a pretty normal thing that people wear these days, so it feels a lot like these kinds of things are posted by some creepy 40 year olds who aren't used to it yet. EDIT: Not saying all MRAs are creepy 40 year olds. Just the ones that get on with this "I have every right to creepily stare at you" idea.
/r/MensRights22/06/19 11:47 AM
21

My CuLtUrE iS nOt YoUr PrOm DrEsS
/r/MensRights20/06/19 10:52 PM
2

Yeaa, power hungry mods are pretty terrible.
/r/MensRights13/06/19 02:52 PM
1

Username checks out
/r/MensRights13/06/19 02:41 PM
2

Pretty much, I was asking why it was a problem that they got the harassment policy improved.
/r/MensRights13/06/19 02:36 PM
1

Basically I commented on a post about a transgender girl who used his/her "male privilege" to extend the sexual harassment policies to cover all forms of harassment before going into conversation therapy.
/r/MensRights13/06/19 02:27 PM
2

That is fair, and in that case it definitely does make sense. My fault for misinterpreting the post.
/r/MensRights07/06/19 01:27 PM
-1

It does seem like that's what OP is referring to though. The point of this article is that if an abortion ban is put in place, then the state should provide the medical fees of the child's birth, as well as it's needs throughout it's childhood. Even as someone who truly is concerned for men's rights, I can't really seem to understand what the issue with this is. If the child's needs wers no longer provided for if the father got full custody, that'd be a different story, but I can't really see an…
/r/MensRights07/06/19 05:22 AM
-6

While I agree with the sentiment of this post, abortion and child support are very different things. It's not really a great comparison. If this were to have been about women not having to pay child support when divorced for example, I would completely agree that it's outrageous. But this is not the same.
/r/MensRights07/06/19 02:36 AM
1

That's a pretty bad way of looking at it. A suicide attempt is a suicide attempt. Neither is pathetic in comparison to another.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 12:18 PM
2

That's a pretty bad way of looking at it. A suicide attempt is a suicide attempt. Neither is pathetic in comparison to another.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 12:18 PM
5

Asking a genuine question should never be downvoted.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 12:16 PM
1

Things certainly are fine compared to the states and many other places in the world. Not to shit on the states or anything but I'd hate to live there.
/r/MensRights21/05/19 11:27 PM
1

Canada. Specifically Newfoundland which means most foods are imported, which can lead to higher prices. Which we tend to see here. Which is certainly an issue with living in this particular place, but for the most part it isn't so bad.
/r/MensRights21/05/19 07:26 PM
2

You fail to take into account that prices are different depending on where one lives. For example, where I live it's pretty much impossible to eat healthy without spending a lot of money, because said healthy foods are simply more expensive.
/r/MensRights21/05/19 07:16 PM
1

Even so, people shouldn't be pushed further into debt because of their lifestyle choices. That'll just make it more difficult to change to a healthy one. Eating healthy and whatnot is more expensive that not.
/r/MensRights21/05/19 07:09 PM
1

That's not how the current system works.
/r/MensRights21/05/19 07:06 PM
1

By who? The health insurance you were calling a scam?
/r/MensRights21/05/19 07:06 PM
1

God it's like talking to a damn wall. I've already established that it isn't nessesairly a lifestyle choice. Everyone paying for it makes it affordable for everyone. Feel free to go bankrupt in the states the next time you need surgery.
/r/MensRights21/05/19 07:04 PM
1

Furthermore, you can live a perfectly healthy lifestyle and still have an appendix burst, or develop cancer.
/r/MensRights21/05/19 06:58 PM
1

Doctors are getting paid for their labor either way, and tax isn't so high that it would severely affect the public's income for the most part. I agree that it currently is too high, but if that's the price we pay for affordable healthcare then I see no issue. It's a public service so the public pays for it. It's just spread out evenly among all who use it, which everyone will at some point.
/r/MensRights21/05/19 06:58 PM
2

You're literally ignoring my point. Those things aren't necessarily caused by lifestyle choices.
/r/MensRights21/05/19 06:46 PM
2

Except for in cases where the perpetrator is not convicted. Or even found. You also failed to address my point about illness. Why should someone have to pay thousands of dollars for chemo just to stay alive? And there's one case where, if you're too poor to afford medical insurance, you really are fucked. And even then there's medical bills for necessary surgeries such as an appendix removeal. Why shoudl someone who might not be wealthy have to go into signifigant debt for that which they cannot…
/r/MensRights21/05/19 06:38 PM
2

Are you dense? Have you not read my posts at all? What of those who get in car accidents, which they are not at fault for? What of those who are assaulted, shot, or otherwise injured by another person? What about those who develop illness that needs to be treated in order for them to stay alive? These are not lifestyle choices. Illness can be, but often times is not. So what about those people? Struggling financially should not mean that you have to forfeit the right to life in good health.
/r/MensRights21/05/19 06:27 PM
2

I at no point said that. We should support healthy lifestyles, but not at the cost of affordable healthcare to the less fortunate.
/r/MensRights21/05/19 06:17 PM
3

It is simply more affordable. Are you saying it's better to end up with crippling medical debt because you get in an accident, or get shot, things you can't control? Say you struggle financially and that happens? What then? I agree insurance is a scam, but it's better than going completely bankrupt because of a medical complication. Getting injured is not a lifestyle issue, getting cancer is not always a lifestyle issue, there are a far greater number of factors to consider than you are right no…
/r/MensRights21/05/19 06:11 PM
3

Once again, I state that I do not support Trudeau. I simply used Canada as an example of a country with socialist traits, which is doing, for the most part, fine. Which it is. I at no point tried to act like it was perfect.
/r/MensRights21/05/19 06:02 PM
2

They get paid to do their job by everyone who uses their services. It's simply done in a way that is far easier to afford. How hard is that to understand exactly?
/r/MensRights21/05/19 05:59 PM
4

While yes this is an issue, and I personally am not a fan of Trudeau, every country will inevitably have its issues. I could also however argue that America is way worse, what with the constant school shootings, abortion bans, and the healthcare system that leaves it with the highest pregnancy mortality rate of all developed nations. To say that Canada is not for the most part fine over one issue is immature at best.
/r/MensRights21/05/19 05:58 PM
5

It's the right to health care. The doctors get paid through tax money. Y'know, so getting shot doesn't bankrupt you.
/r/MensRights21/05/19 05:48 PM
4

Why should that exempt people from a basic human right?
/r/MensRights21/05/19 05:46 PM
-1

It was initially, but it has lost it's purpose. I don't really see much of that with socialism. I live in Canada, which has socialist traits, such as tax paid healthcare, and it's fine here.
/r/MensRights21/05/19 05:44 PM
4

It's an economic system. Anything outside of that simply is not socialism. It's just plain racism/sexism/ect
/r/MensRights21/05/19 05:37 PM
-10

Sorry but what does socialism have to do with this? Socialism is about ensuring the needs of citizens are met. Not sexism.
/r/MensRights21/05/19 04:28 PM
6

They get off scot free. In some cases they might get a small amount of jail time, but thats rare.
/r/MensRights21/05/19 03:16 PM
0

I don't disagree with the sentiment here, but this was not the place for it. She lives in a third world country where rape is a lot more common, and people only get a wrist slap for it. That was not the place to make it about "MRA's vs Feminists."
/r/MensRights27/04/19 05:58 PM
4

Maybe because its a young teenager vs a fucking adult you damned idiot. Women usually don't fight back due to fear of harm and it's the same thing here.
/r/MensRights28/03/19 04:22 PM
1

I disagree. We should not support hate speech. We should not support blatant racism or sexism, or bigotry at all. We should be against true hate speech, not fake hate speech that an sjw might talk about.
/r/MensRights22/03/19 03:11 PM
10

I remember that post. He was 100% raped and pretty much everyone agreed.
/r/MensRights21/03/19 11:05 AM
15

I think he was being sarcastic, but I'm not sure. I hope he was anyway.
/r/MensRights21/03/19 11:00 AM
-7

Keep in mind that she isn't being completely let off the hook here. It is simply a sentence reduction. While I agree that it would have been much worse for a man in this situation, it is understandable to feel that such a long time of abuse would be acceptable grounds for a manslaughter charge rather than murder.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 07:54 PM
3

No it's not justified. Young people should be protected, period. Your way of thinking makes me think you were born in the 1600s.
/r/MensRights13/02/19 11:53 PM
3

Why does it make any difference that she's a girl? If she consented then she was obviously in the same mindset as a guy in this situation.
/r/MensRights13/02/19 11:30 PM
3

But she "consented" So what's the difference?
/r/MensRights13/02/19 11:18 PM
8

So if your 13 year old daughter has sex with her 40 year old teacher and claims to have consented, you take no issue with that correct?
/r/MensRights13/02/19 10:37 PM
2

You're a fucking moron
/r/MensRights10/02/19 06:24 AM
8

Sorry but wtf does Marxism have to do with this?
/r/MensRights10/02/19 06:10 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter