TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Shdwfalcon Archive

View 3 posts and 220 comments by Shdwfalcon on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
13

Perfect cases for the new "anti-discrimination" laws to work on.
/r/MensRights20/12/24 03:09 AM
3

Hear hear. Cold hard truths spoken right there.
/r/MensRights07/12/24 04:38 AM
17

They live in one of the most welfare country in the world, and yet they still bitch and moan about "stress". What a bloody joke and clownshow.
/r/MensRights05/12/24 05:40 AM
10

The human society won't be able to survive 1 week without men. Heck, it will collapse within a week. Men are the ones building and maintaining civilisation's infrastructure. Men are the reason why women can enjoy their fancy urban cafes and retarded attention-seeking social media on their smartphone. Men are the reason why women are enjoy clean toilet sanitisation and working sewer systems. Men are the reason why women can enjoy roads and modern day transportation. Men build from scratch. Women …
/r/MensRights28/11/24 12:26 AM
1

First time? Lol
/r/MensRights26/11/24 12:39 PM
26

So when sewage maintenance and shipping port technicians become 80% women? I am still waiting for the talk to take the walk.
/r/MensRights23/11/24 05:45 AM
2

Nothing new. This has been going on for many years. Many men in China have had given up and just focus on playing games or becoming what those social elitists would call a "weeb". China females are some of the most toxic materialistic females, even worse than my country's female. And that is saying something. China had the one child policy decades ago, and this resulted in way too many males and too few females. This, on top of the typical "80% of the females only aim for the top 20% of the male…
/r/MensRights23/11/24 05:17 AM
2

What do you mean "in a few years"? France has always been a shithole.
/r/MensRights20/11/24 01:49 PM
76

Why surprised? The AI is pulling from recent data, and being anti-male and ignoring male events while celebrating and overhyping female events is the norm. Hence why the AI also reacted like that. This should be nothing new to you.
/r/MensRights20/11/24 12:21 AM
1

You can continue to sprout nonsensical claims and bullshit, it won't change facts and reality. You can continue to hide in your own little lalaland with your retarded claims of "violating the constitution" bullshit. The fact is swing voters have spoken with their votes, they rather deal with the republican nutjob than the toxic kamala and her toxic woke gang. The swing voters had had enough of the stupid identity politics and social terrorism that the woke retards are doing. The swing voters dec…
/r/MensRights07/11/24 01:28 PM
2

What do you mean don't respect the consitution? This election prove one thing: the woke retards have gone so toxic and far extreme to the point where the swing voters would rather vote some two-bit nutjob over someone who will make the world even more woke toxic than it already is. Donald Trump is simply a case of being "the lesser of two evils". The reason why the democrats lost is because they did it upon themselves, pushing toxic woke retarded agendas and pissing even the swing voters off. Th…
/r/MensRights07/11/24 05:45 AM
3

Its funny because India has a serious rape issue. Yet despite its reputation, the women there are equally, if not more ruthless in twisting and lying.
/r/MensRights17/10/24 08:50 AM
16

I would like to add "being salty" on top of "envy".
/r/MensRights16/10/24 06:08 AM
110

Who is she again? Never heard of her. In the eastern side of the world, where I am from, we have numerous mandopop and cantopop male singers still reeling in sold-out concerts in their 70s. Meanwhile, female artists are... Harder to be found at that age range.
/r/MensRights16/10/24 06:07 AM
5

"Be a translator" is what I would say. The country and the people ain't worth protecting, so do whatever it takes to survive, even if it means woeking for the other side. For those who are not from Singapore, let me do a little context explaining. During the Japanese Occupation in WWII, two individuals, Lee Kuan Yew and SR Nathan, qorked for the japanese; the former as a translator helping to translate texts that either become propaganda leaflets or letting the japanese hunt down resistance, the…
/r/MensRights14/10/24 11:32 AM
34

Kangaroo court indeed. The ironic pun.
/r/MensRights11/10/24 09:11 AM
37

No. I say let them continue to openly demand to have their cake and eat it. This way, you get to see the trash that they are right upfront on the spot. Figuring out the real trash (like them) and the real gems is so much easier with them doing their nonsense openly.
/r/MensRights07/10/24 12:20 PM
2

Thank you, Captain Obvious. Meanwhile, in other news, water is wet.
/r/MensRights04/10/24 03:45 AM
28

Pretty much it. Men have always been the one who is expected to compensate and compromise for their partner and society in general. Women are socially raised to be the exact opposite, to "want their way, have their way, etc". Putting two copies of the latter together is basically a recipe for disaster.
/r/MensRights02/10/24 02:45 AM
16

Both male and female gets the whip and public beatings in Saudi Arabia. But to put it in another light, at least the punishments goes across the board. In my country, females are banned from getting canned, while men gets thrown at the whip like no tomorrow.
/r/MensRights28/09/24 10:05 AM
2

Ladies and gentlemen, if you want to know what a "kangaroo court" is, this is a perfect example of a "kangaroo court".
/r/MensRights28/09/24 04:26 AM
11

Women taking men for granted is an age old tale older than time itself.
/r/MensRights26/09/24 02:01 PM
25

Developed cities of China are ridiciously ultra cutthroat competitive. If you are not among the elites or with strong backing, its basically fighting for scraps in a "you snooze, you lose" basis. Remember the saying "80% of the women only want the top 20% of the men"? This is extremely true in developed cities in China. Rural areas? Those are where the leftovers are, which isn't much of a population number compared to the urbanised cities in terms of population density.
/r/MensRights25/09/24 08:15 AM
9

Unlike modern feminism, traditional chinese "eldest son" culture is a more-benefits-but-more-responsibility-more-expectations basis. In case you don't know, the bulk of parental expectations, pressure, and responsibilities is being directed at the "eldest son". The eldest son might gain more benefits, but he has the least leeway and freedom among all his siblings. That is how traditional chinese "eldest son" culture work. And female infanticide? That was because male children can work in the fie…
/r/MensRights23/09/24 04:50 AM
32

The judge didn't even bother to understand what the chinese tradition entails. Modern feminism demands all kinds of entitlement and freebies, but keep completely mum when it comes to having more responsibilities and social expectations. Traditional chinese "eldest son" culture grants lots of entitlement and benefits to the eldest son, but said eldest son also bears not only a shitload of responsibilities, but also massive parental AND social expectations and pressure. Even the "second son" carri…
/r/MensRights23/09/24 04:31 AM
7

Very hard to say. The mother is mentioned to be very traditional. In typical ancient chinese tradition, the eldest son is favoured; however said eldest son also carries all the expectations of "succeeding" and "carrying on the family name" brought down upon by the parents. An outsider who does not understand this tradition concept would not know how much pressure the "eldest son" carrries. For westerners to understand easier, the closest example I can think of is the Queen of England, Elizabeth …
/r/MensRights23/09/24 01:39 AM
10

Contesting on wills based on "eldest child" or "favorite child" basis is nothing new, and is, in fact, fairly common. However, this case is different, as she is arguing based on gender alone. Do note that the eldest child, the son, fought back by stating he was managing the rental properties, aka "having contributions". In chinese tradition, this eldest son thing does exist. However, it comes with many caveats. For one, the bulk of the responsibility of "family succession" and "carrying on the f…
/r/MensRights23/09/24 01:29 AM
11

They claimed it was gender bias, yet the deceased was not around to defend that bullshit claim. The woman and her lawyers are the real sexist, using some bullshit sexist claim to flip it up to sexist court judges. Inheritance is decided by the deceased owner, if she has already decided how much to give to who, that is her choice, because the assets were still hers prior to her death. Unfair or not, that is her choice and decision, not the daughter's. So what if the gender is flipped? Well, this …
/r/MensRights23/09/24 01:11 AM
26

Welcome to asian culture. We are like that for donkey centuries. The eldest son concept is a norm in families. Boys are expected to be the "head" and so are piled expectations upon expectations, be the sole provider, uphold the family name and "honor", be the problem solver, be the one who has to sacrifice in the name of family, etc. in my country, some of this tradition has died out, but the responsbilities still remains. In some more rural parts of China, if a man screwed up, he and his entire…
/r/MensRights17/09/24 07:42 AM
2

Ah yes, equality suddenly don't sound so good now, does it? Men in her position would just shrug and chug along, finding ways to balance family time and money management while keeping the relationship alive. Women would bitch about it instead. What a bloody joke.
/r/MensRights27/08/24 06:07 AM
6

Females expect to marry up. Of course their options gets massively smaller as they climb up the corporate ladder. Stupid gaslighting article.
/r/MensRights22/08/24 08:59 AM
1

Feminism is ALWAYS about "me, myself, and I". Not surprising that would happen.
/r/MensRights21/08/24 03:38 AM
1

Child support is never a seperate issue. In alimony cases, child support is the default EXCUSE to rip the ex-husband off and leech off him.
/r/MensRights19/08/24 01:25 AM
1

And their ATM money supply.
/r/MensRights06/08/24 01:37 AM
2

Weird. I am a man and I have none of those privileges. Where can I get them? This is outragous! I want to claim what I am suppose to have!
/r/MensRights05/07/24 05:49 AM
98

To feminists, men are not humans, just tools for them to use and leech off. So it is normal for them to hate when the spotlight is on those whom them deem as nothing more than stepping stones instead of themselves.
/r/MensRights28/06/24 04:39 AM
31

In my country? No benefits at all. On the other hand, benefits for not getting married are in abundance.
/r/MensRights25/06/24 02:00 AM
8

Worse part is they are under fast-tracked progress as a "white horse". So no suffering, no being on the receiving end of shitshows and extra wayang that only serve to enroch the upper ranks and their office politics nonsense.
/r/MensRights16/06/24 12:24 AM
6

I am very open about the fact that I am a Singaporean in Singapore. I did not hide this fact, neither did I even bother to try to. You really need to stop over-thinking things. This is how I talk when discussing things and referring to my country.
/r/MensRights16/06/24 12:20 AM
99

In our country, a Member of Parliament literally said serving is a privilege. And yes, our country practised forced conscription for males only.
/r/MensRights15/06/24 11:46 AM
1

If she wants a female doctor, she should have tell right drom the get go instead of waiting until everything is prepared and everyone is scrubbed.
/r/MensRights13/06/24 11:40 AM
3

Well, I mean, you NEED to carry out racial and gender discrimination in order to fulfill DEI initiatives, so...
/r/MensRights08/06/24 03:32 AM
11

Because women are bitching about it and blaming it on men, when it isn't men's problem. Naturally men will point out the idiocy and retarded expectations.
/r/MensRights04/06/24 11:31 AM
11

Absolutely nothing to do with liking women having education or not. Problem is women tend to have the expectation of marrying UP. By chasing higher education, they drastically reduce their own sample pool of partners. But instead of toning down their own expectations, they continue to insist on marrying up while on the other hand whining and bitching about not enough "good men". They choose to limit themselves to that tiny pool of choice and subject themselves to high competition among their own…
/r/MensRights04/06/24 09:30 AM
0

If you actually read my post and see what and how I used to describle the term "woke", you will have your answer to that.
/r/MensRights30/05/24 12:02 AM
0

Heh. You just described the shitshow called "Rings of Power", a show so bad, giving it 1 out of 10 is an insult to all shows that are 1 out of 10.
/r/MensRights29/05/24 04:17 PM
0

The most recent Godzilla Kong moive was shit too. No, it wasn't because the leads were females, but rather, they shoehorned in the "oppressed society" and that utterly destroyed the movie storyline and buildup. The first half was pretty good, then the "oppressed society" part began, and everything just became garbage and shit tier.
/r/MensRights29/05/24 04:04 PM
-1

There was some form of backlash, in case you are still in some mountain cave. People were pointing out his character should not be white, and is bullshit. There was another movie, think its called The Wall or something, where they insert white guys in as main characters in a China setting, and whom saved the day and was the big hero and all. That film got whacked too. Back then, the term woke wasn't wasn't a widespread trendy term, but that doesn't mean the backlash didn't exist. They do, they j…
/r/MensRights29/05/24 03:59 PM
6

Fact: prostitution is one of the oldest profession in the human world.
/r/MensRights27/05/24 12:30 AM
7

Well, they do NOT want any men to pursue them; they only want that top 1% men to pursue them. Even now they are still putting up a facade and lie.
/r/MensRights25/05/24 02:56 AM
1

The question should be why is she not living in bear land then? Practise what you preach, bitch.
/r/MensRights23/05/24 03:29 AM
53

Women have the same citizenship rights as men, therefore women have to bear the same citizenship responsibilities as men.
/r/MensRights20/05/24 12:11 PM
7

You gotta be kidding right? Which hospital with a maternity department does not have pain relief for childbirth? In my country, we have an entire hospital delicated to maternity and childbirth, and in there, we have epidural and "laughing gas". When a woman get shipped into the delivery room to wait for the right dilation, the first thing the staff ask is whether she wants an epidural, unless she is in no condition to stay still long enough to have the jab into the spinal cord, which is where th…
/r/MensRights18/05/24 03:18 AM
2

Nope, not if the law and lawmakers are feminists or femisit extremist groups have influence over laws and policies. Case in point: my country, Singapore. Feminist extremist groups have power and influence over laws and policies, and despite having a forced male-only conscription, they managed to make changes as they see fit and shutdown anything they are not happy with in our military camps.
/r/MensRights16/05/24 05:14 AM
12

So when they shutting down girls scouts, aka girls guides?
/r/MensRights08/05/24 02:17 AM
13

Logic doesn't work on those with herd mentality.
/r/MensRights02/05/24 12:51 PM
2

Someone please ship these bitches to bearland and let them live there!
/r/MensRights02/05/24 12:50 PM
2

Firstly, I am going to call out on your bullshit. There are female recipents for George Cross; your claim that all GC recipents are men is fake and bullshit. Secondly, George Cross is among the highest award that can be given. Now, think back on how many women actually put themselves into situations whereby they risk their lives and very likely to end up sacrificing their own lives, and compare that to how many men put themselves in such situations.
/r/MensRights01/05/24 04:59 AM
3

At this rate, Australia society will be down under, literally.
/r/MensRights29/04/24 07:14 AM
6

This is what you call a corrupted kangaroo court.
/r/MensRights27/04/24 04:56 AM
17

Its about time they get a taste of their very own medicine.
/r/MensRights26/04/24 01:27 AM
3

Bruh. They are making the assertion, no? They should be the one bringing up the evidence to support their claims first.
/r/MensRights14/04/24 02:50 PM
10

That stupid nonsense only works in 1800s. This is 2024, women are as evil and committing all kinds of crimes as men. We are at the point where both sexes can be as bad, but only one sex is heavily punished while the other usually gets away easy.
/r/MensRights13/04/24 12:18 PM
8

You know, we have this saying: A woman marries a man, hoping he will change, but he never does. A man marries a woman hoping she doesn't change, but she always do.
/r/MensRights11/04/24 12:57 AM
8

Your country's military logistic are neither conscripted, nor sign-up full time personnels in uniform? What kind of military is that? HAMAS?
/r/MensRights07/04/24 03:20 PM
25

Ah yes, the classic red herring of conscripting women means putting them ONLY in the frontlines, while selectively ignoring the headcount needed to run the entire supporting logistic and supply chain. Heard this bullshit since donkey ages ago from my country. Same selective bullshit, different country.
/r/MensRights07/04/24 02:07 PM
9

While you are at it, might as well enforce no working for females; females cannot drive because it would put them at risk, lesser females to bear children if accidents happen; females cannot go outside because if anything happens, we have lesser females to bear children, etc. Oh, and in war, females are not allowed to defend their homes, and neither should they do so. But wait! Historically, in Japan, where honor and strict tradition used to exist on an obscene level, they even have weapons that…
/r/MensRights07/04/24 11:43 AM
16

What kind of selective bullshit argument is that? For every frontline military unit, there is an entire supply chain logistic behind them. Females can easily fill up this manpower demanding sector. Why do you people like to harp about females in frontline and intentionally ignoring the backline logistic sector? This same bullshit selective argument keep happening in my country too.
/r/MensRights07/04/24 03:08 AM
31

Force conscript both male and female? Why didn't he do that in the first place? He forced conscripted males, but allow females out of the country freely. Now he claims not enough bodies and thus had to draft males that are too young? Zen is a clown, period. He should be ousted long ago, but the incomptent idiots under him are just as closns as him. Whole damn group is a circus show.
/r/MensRights07/04/24 02:57 AM
1

This is reasonable. Give way to one, the rest will also want similar treatment. The company has the right to be concern over this.
/r/MensRights05/04/24 10:22 AM
19

Rule #1: Never ever put females on pedestal Rule #2: Females are not important to have in your life, neither are they needed in your life Rule #3: Refer to Rules #1 and #2.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 11:31 PM
8

The movie doesn't really knows what it wants. It tries to be everything, but fails to be anything. It ends up being shallow and boring.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 06:45 PM
83

Group validation, aka hive mind. Very normal female trait.
/r/MensRights18/03/24 02:12 PM
11

That is such a retard. A military is never meant to protect women; a military is meant to attack or defend an organisation or place.
/r/MensRights14/03/24 11:29 AM
102

Same thing with sexual crimes. They always like to say men commit all the sexual crimes, which is untrue because women who committed sexual crimes are not considered as commit said crime, hence the skewered fake stats.
/r/MensRights10/03/24 10:52 AM
22

These retards are not there to gym or train; these retards are just there to farm likes and clicks on their social media. Framing guys and playing victim card is one of the most common tactic of attention seeking and click baiting on social media. Ban all forms of personal recording, and you eill see these hypocritical fakes fade away.
/r/MensRights07/03/24 04:40 AM
8

Not every, but my country is sexist alright. The laws are anti-commoner-male, while being pro-female. And yes, my country carries out forced conscriptions for males and males only, even though it is written as gender-neutral and encompasses everyone of age.
/r/MensRights05/03/24 04:43 AM
6

It is her every duty to fight for her country too. She has a part in nation defense too.
/r/MensRights05/03/24 04:39 AM
7

Why is she not fighting for her country then? Like you said, you should absolutely be required to fight for your country, yet she is not and you are not criticising her about it. Why suddenly the double standards? Is Ukraine not her country?
/r/MensRights05/03/24 04:38 AM
19

Ladies first. :)
/r/MensRights05/03/24 04:36 AM
3

Reminds me of the females in my own country: https://youtu.be/fHhrEErI3rk?si=pZm9L1xzoomdlbHp
/r/MensRights29/02/24 12:02 AM
9

False accusation for a serious offense and that is all she got? It's not even considered a punishment!
/r/MensRights28/02/24 01:22 AM
1

Funniest part is you can see way more skin and skimpy clothings out on the streets fairly frequently. Well, at least in my country, can't say for all.
/r/MensRights23/02/24 05:12 AM
1

I don't find questions that are used for the surveys and studies. Anyone has the full list? Or do they have something to hide?
/r/MensRights22/02/24 01:25 AM
13

Calling her a comedian is the biggest insult to all comedians. Also, she is a rapist. Want to know a good example of a real comedian who can take as much as he dishes out? Fluffy is a solid example.
/r/MensRights16/02/24 10:02 PM
8

Welcome to double standards. We have females openly film guys and then posting on social media to bash and mock. Yet nothing happens to them. Then when guys do it, he will be arrested within a day while the social media retards scream bloody murder. Oh yea, while we are at it. In my country, males gets the whip (caning), but females don't.
/r/MensRights14/02/24 01:30 AM
2

Sounds like you are from the same country as me lol
/r/MensRights07/02/24 03:11 PM
7

Come to Singapore bro. We have male-only forced conscription AND female-biased marriage laws by anti-male organisation Women Charter literally in official legal marriage certificates. SK still has a long way to go to reach our level of anti-commoner-male.
/r/MensRights03/02/24 03:14 PM
2

The men of Iceland should all take the day off too. Shut down the entire country infrastructure and economy in one go.
/r/MensRights25/10/23 02:04 PM
5

Well, prostitutes are not exactly well known for settling down easily, right?
/r/MensRights22/10/23 04:34 PM
22

Singapore too. Same shit, except we have two anti-male feminist groups that have power and influence over the government law. Hell, one of the anti-men feminist groups have many policies that are enacted as laws in our country.
/r/MensRights08/10/23 11:49 PM
3

So, Morgan Young and Bo Young Lee are transphobics.
/r/MensRights07/10/23 03:50 PM
11

That way of news layout and editing reminds me of Nazi propaganda papers... Same tone, same style, same kind of pattern.
/r/AntiFeminists05/09/23 11:08 PM
12

You forgot Frozen and Frozen 2. Bumbling guys and heroic mary sue.
/r/MensRights02/09/23 10:53 AM
9

Golddigger. 'Nuff said. She asked for it.
/r/MensRights27/08/23 09:59 PM
4

You did right. Women can be creeps and carry out sexual harrassment too, not just men. The only difference is women can and will get away with it scott free and turn you into the aggressor and her the victim instead.
/r/MensRights27/08/23 04:36 AM
2

They are hen-pecked cucks and simps. That is why.
/r/MensRights26/08/23 03:48 AM
3

Women only community means no men whatsoever. If spmething is spoilt, only women are allowed to fix it. If the building needs maintanence, only women are allowed to do the maintenance. Even for deliveries, only women are allowed, no men are allowed to make deliveries to them. If men comes in to do any work whatsoever or enter the premises, it means the community is NOT women-only. Now let's see they walk the talk, or are just a bunch of self-entitled retards.
/r/MensRights25/08/23 01:41 PM
15

The judge deserve a trophy for being neutral and fair. If only the kangaroo courts over this side are like that...
/r/MensRights23/08/23 10:51 PM
4

Surverys tend to contain very loaded question, so take the results with a whole ocean of salt. But one thing is damn true, which is a woman's greatest enemy is not herself nor man, but is of other women. Women are always the one judging other women for anything and everything; outfits, hairstyle, handbags, work, looks, etc.
/r/MensRights23/08/23 10:38 PM
8

FWBs or pay-for-the-deed-and-no-strings-attached is the way to go in the current first world societies.
/r/MensRights23/08/23 09:06 AM
4

Keanu Reeves does not give a fuck. Keanu Reeves is smart. Be like Keanu Reeves.
/r/MensRights23/08/23 07:18 AM
2

The law did not mention gender. However, it does say that anyone who got the official letter is considered to be forced conscripted. Incidentally, only males get issued the forced conscription letter. Kind of the same way us forced conscripted get an allowance, not a salary; hence bypassing all labour laws regarding salary.
/r/MensRights23/08/23 03:33 AM
29

Why else forced conscription exist?
/r/MensRights19/08/23 03:40 AM
5

They absolutely can. They are just too lazy, busy riding their moral high horse, and have zero sense of responsibility, to do actual manual labour or actual work for that matter.
/r/MensRights18/08/23 11:04 PM
3

Lowhanging fruit. It is actually way easier to virtue signal than to do actual work, because virtue signalling requires zero effort and responsibility. Baring chest is just virtue signalling, and requires no effort or responsibility whatsoever.
/r/MensRights18/08/23 11:02 PM
11

Feminism has NEVER been for men. Only naive fools believe otherwise.
/r/MensRights17/08/23 09:59 PM
4

Women are group-reliant. That is why they can never know what they actually want. They just follow blindly wherever the group goes.
/r/MensRights17/08/23 04:31 AM
10

All the more to not give up anything. Avoid her and her legal team at all costs. If she has friends or cliche, avoid them all too. Draw the line wide and clear, and never cross it. Let your lawyer do all the comms and dealings. She is obviously trying to fish for your information in order to squeeze out more from you before dumping you into the gutters for good. Clam up and only deal with your lawyer from now onwards.
/r/MensRights17/08/23 12:19 AM
4

Lawyer up ASAP. Most importantly: NEVER EVER communicate to her! Let your lawyer do the communication and dealings. Your lawyer will know what to say, and what information to provide. Do NOT speak to or give any information to the other party (includes your ex-wife, her legal team, and basically everyone else except your lawyer) in any form or manner.
/r/MensRights17/08/23 12:15 AM
2

Emotional labour is a non-existant term used by females to pad their victim cards. Get it now?
/r/MensRights16/08/23 07:09 AM
2

I also tell women to man up. Gotta be fair, gender equality yoz.
/r/MensRights16/08/23 01:26 AM
11

He brings 5x the earning amount to the table. It is only fair to ask her what else she can bring to the table as an equal in their relationship. Oh wait, she doesn't want equality in the relationship, she wants to be a leech.
/r/MensRights15/08/23 12:22 PM
5

Not really. A good provider means being capable of dealing and slogging out in the outside world, being independent, having the discipline to continue to farm to "put food on the table", etc. All these are traits needed to survive reality, and being a good example of such traits for the kids is extremely good.
/r/MensRights15/08/23 05:13 AM
1

It is a follow up to my previous reply based on your question. I answered your question clear enough. You should stay on topic and read instead of keep repeating yourself and getting lost in your own little bubble running circles after your own tail. If you still don't understand, try reading my first post and then my follow up reply. They are all linked via chain effect.
/r/MensRights15/08/23 01:21 AM
0

My first sentence is very clear. Learn to read.
/r/MensRights15/08/23 01:07 AM
0

They then have to develop their own self to meet your standards, since the power of choosing shifted to you. Unless you are a simp or white knight. In which case, you are the biggest reason why females are in such a fucked up self-entitled state nowadays. Only simps and white knights are the losers who go around whining about having to do self-development and placing females on pedestrals. And they are the exact reason why females are so fucked up nowadays.
/r/MensRights15/08/23 12:42 AM
-3

OP didn't watch the full video to understand his context? Jordon Peterson is right. As men, we have to man the fuck up and focus on our own development.
/r/MensRights14/08/23 11:22 AM
11

The guy is a simp. Fuck him for promoting and breeding female entitlement.
/r/MensRights14/08/23 11:14 AM
3

Singapore. We have Women's Charter and AWARE. Women's Charter outdated "rules" are still part of Singapore's marriage legal laws.
/r/MensRights14/08/23 11:13 AM
3

At least in SK, one can still find ways to avoid drafts. In my country, all males are being forced conscripted for 2 years, then have to attend at least 10 in-camp cycles for the next 10 or so years. Yet we still get mocked and shamed on social media in public by females and others for meaningless stuff like sitting down on a train, while our government turn a blind eye to all these mocking. If you don't accept the forced conscription, you get jailed for it (criminal record). Yes, it is hardcode…
/r/MensRights14/08/23 04:14 AM
1

What that article intentionally leave out is that men are usually the main provider, who are the ones that commit extra into their career in order to earn more. Meanwhile, women falter behind because they cannot commit as much or more due to needing more time and focus on parenting and raising kids. This is to be expected. You cannot have your cake and eat it. People who put in more hours or commit more to the job or career naturally expect to earn more. Men are generally the ones who had to do …
/r/MensRights13/08/23 08:48 AM
5

A toxic website labelling others toxic. Slightly ironic.
/r/MensRights11/08/23 01:41 PM
1

Bruh. This is 2023. It ain't happening even if the last man on earth is fat and balding.
/r/MensRights10/08/23 08:29 AM
4

Good luck with that. She just ruined his future and turn him into a whim and loser.
/r/MensRights08/08/23 10:20 PM
1

Females form the core of the loudest bandwagoners everywhere you go. They are the kind who live and die by groupthink. Tells you a lot.
/r/MensRights08/08/23 10:17 PM
3

She should revert to female since she still wants to be like a female afterall, not a male.
/r/MensRights08/08/23 11:19 AM
6

Oh hey look! Some clown who has barely any experience is teaching us who are literally born and grew up as a men how to be a man! Translating from one of my country's dialects: being smart is okay, but don't act smart. Retard thinks she is more knowledgable and experienced than us who literally born and grew up as men.
/r/MensRights08/08/23 11:18 AM
1

Walk out. Walk straight out of the relationship right now. Better to dodge the bullet now, then to eat the full chaingun volley down the road.
/r/MensRights05/08/23 06:39 AM
7

Indoctrination and brainwashing starts from young. You have no idea how ingrained and deeply rooted our ruling party's presence is in our primary and secondary schools.
/r/MensRights31/07/23 08:33 AM
35

Child support is a scam. If you ain't having some form of custody of the child, you should not be supporting anything. Why should someone pay for something that does not exist in their lives?
/r/MensRights31/07/23 08:29 AM
5

They even intentionally labelled it as an allowance, not salary. This allows them to circumvent all MOM's employment rules and regulations. So they basically pay us peanuts while forcefully enslaving us, and get away with it.
/r/MensRights31/07/23 04:28 AM
25

Bruh, yours is six months. In my country, it is 2 damn years of forced conscription for all males. Best part? The society loves to mock us when we are serving and wearing green. If we sit on the train, we get photo-sniped by foreigners and females and then posted online and mocked for being a loser and weakling who cannot stand. Our government mock us by saying it is our "privilege", and pay us a pathetic amount of allowance, saying "cannot be measured in dollars and cents". It is not even consi…
/r/MensRights31/07/23 04:23 AM
32

No biggie. When you have the urge and want the natural deal, just pay up for a no strings attached, and move on with life. Men can live perfectly fine on their own. It is the women who is dependant on society.
/r/MensRights31/07/23 01:18 AM
6

Well, can't deny she IS ugly, both looks wise and personality wise.
/r/MensRights30/07/23 11:30 PM
48

Modern day marriage system is designed and catered for women, not men. Many men are waking up to this nonsense.
/r/MensRights30/07/23 01:41 AM
2

Lucky I am Asian... Oh wait- https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.scmp.com/week-asia/society/article/3020661/offensive-singapore-rap-video-attacking-chinese-people-sparks
/r/MensRights30/07/23 12:00 AM
2

I have an insane level of tolerance for rubbish shows. I have cleared lame boring animes that are 24 episodes long, have sat through B grade movies from start to finish, and all. But I didn't survive She-hulk. Ended up throwing in the towel and calling it quits at the third episode. Even Rings of Power faired slightly better where I call it quits at the 4th episode. Yes, She-hulk is that bad. So bad, calling it a shitshow is an insult to shitshows.
/r/MensRights29/07/23 11:54 PM
4

There is a reason why true activists do not exists in the poorer third world countries where equality is truly lacking; they only exist in first world countries where advancements in civilisations and social progress has occurred. All these activists are nothing more than useless virtual signalling disruptions in the society.
/r/MensRights29/07/23 11:50 PM
4

It is amazing how she is shilling her book and all, yet despite it releasing in 2019, I don't even know it existed. I guess shit and rubbish don't last, only classics do.
/r/MensRights29/07/23 11:45 PM
2

You call bollocks without substantiating your contentless remark. People are simply calling your bullshit out.
/r/MensRights27/07/23 08:17 AM
44

So when are we having a movie about a female Hitler and female Nazis torturing POWs? Gotta be inclusive right? Women in power right? I'm still waiting.
/r/MensRights26/07/23 01:42 AM
6

Meanwhile, you intentionally neglect to mention most men in movies are either comic relief or just dumb followers. The "patriachy men" you people like to harp about only exist solely in the form of the main character. All male side characters, no matter how cool they are made out to be, ends up just being either comic relief or stepping stone to prop the main character further up. Men that are not the main character have always been the joke since the age of time. Yet I don't see people like you…
/r/MensRights25/07/23 10:51 PM
1

In my country, if the teacher was a male, the headline news will be calling it "sexual grooming". But yes, if the teacher is a female, suddenly facts and laws don't apply.
/r/MensRights22/07/23 04:07 AM
7

They can always quit their social media "careers". Get a proper education, get an actual job. But nah, they know sex sells, and they choose to objectify themselves for the quick moolah. Just need to sell skin and sex, to them it is much easier than grinding the rat race.
/r/MensRights21/07/23 11:13 AM
2

Circumcising without valid medical reason is considered mutilation. Period.
/r/MensRights20/07/23 11:35 PM
10

She was probably a "diversity promotion".
/r/MensRights20/07/23 10:33 PM
5

Most women have absurbly insane requirements for their would-be partner, that only the top 5% of the men in the world would be able to meet. The main reason, however, is that women NEVER want or like to marry down. NEVER.
/r/MensRights20/07/23 12:40 AM
25

Firstly, you made a claim and use a book as evidence, but the book is locked behind paywall. Either you post the content out for us to read, or provide something that the general public can access without jumping through paywall hoops. As it stands alone, it reeks of advertisment and promotion of said book. Secondly, how do we know the content is thoughly peer reviewed and not the usual statistic magic? And that brings us back to my first point.
/r/MensRights17/07/23 08:52 AM
1

Gonna have to disagree on you on intelligence is genetics. In my country, we are run by one political party clinging on to power. They consists of various top scholars from our armed forces, all with top academic grades all the way up to masters and beyond. Yet when you see their performance and how they behave, they are no smarter. Our Prime Minister, despite having excellent academic grades and groomed to be a Prime Minister for decades, is no more than a bootlicking clown on international sta…
/r/MensRights17/07/23 05:41 AM
8

Kangaroo courts with biased against males are nothing new in today's society.
/r/MensRights15/07/23 11:40 PM
6

Men pay taxes and their tax money are being used against them biasedly. What a world we live in.
/r/MensRights15/07/23 10:13 AM
87

Well, if they are okay with transgender females participating in women sports and using female toilets, why are they complaining about transgender females participating in beauty pageants, much less winning it? I am sorry, but you cannot have your cake and eat it. You allowed it to happen, you legalise it. Now that it happens, you suddenly become selective?
/r/MensRights13/07/23 08:01 AM
4

Males are being taken for granted. This is a tale as old as time.
/r/MensRights12/07/23 11:24 PM
7

Women are infamous for not knowing what they actually want...
/r/MensRights12/07/23 12:21 AM
2

Ouch. Kangaroo courts and feminism seems to be under the same bedsheet in many first world countries.
/r/MensRights11/07/23 11:00 PM
1

Well, can't blame something that doesn't exist, right?
/r/MensRights11/07/23 04:08 AM
1

Talk is cheap. Obviously it is just damage control because they saw how the court case has turned.
/r/AntiFeminists27/05/22 04:18 AM
9

Rule of thumb: If they resort to personal attacks and insults, it shows they have no substance or real arguments, aka empty vessel.
/r/AntiFeminists26/05/22 04:17 AM
6

Its the classic "either you are with me or against me" mentality.
/r/AntiFeminists26/05/22 03:59 AM
5

Its simple. When a person switches to personal attack, it proves the person has no substance and is just an empty vessel.
/r/AntiFeminists26/05/22 03:57 AM
2

So why does she even have a boyfriend in the first place?
/r/AntiFeminists24/05/22 12:05 AM
-8

So what is her Onlyfan page again?
/r/AntiFeminists29/12/21 09:27 AM
-9

I didn't say he was right. I was saying the ones committing adultery are not punished in any way by law. Hence me saying adultery is officially not a crime in my country.
/r/MensRights03/12/21 12:52 PM
10

SINGAPORE - A 27-year-old man who posted a photo on Facebook of his wife having sex with her work supervisor, calling the supervisor a "homewrecker" in his caption, was sentenced to 13 weeks' jail on Friday (Dec 3). The public post went viral with thousands of shares. The Singaporean man, who cannot be named due to a gag order to protect his wife's identity, pleaded guilty earlier to one count each of theft and distributing an intimate image. Another two charges of being in possession of and dis…
/r/MensRights03/12/21 12:37 PM
1

Welcome to my country, where adultery is NOT a crime.
/r/MensRights03/12/21 12:35 PM
1

Should send her to the talibans. Then she will know the real meaning of patriachy and power dynamic or whatever fancy but empty terms she is shitting out.
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/21 11:55 PM
1

Singapore's Women Charter. There is no male version, neither do that organisation helps males.
/r/MensRights19/08/21 10:08 AM
2

Well, someone has to do it. Someone will need the strength and built to do it. Hell, not just someone, we need many of such people. Manual labour is part of everyday life.
/r/AntiFeminists19/08/21 09:31 AM
3

That is definitely quality /s material lol
/r/AntiFeminists19/08/21 09:28 AM
4

Meanwhile, in our county, the law states every citizen of age will undergo forced conscription, but only the males get called up. For our case, we have two toxic feminist organisations that has influence and power over our law and policy, and because the ruling political party value women's votes because our society is overpampering and overprotecting females.
/r/MensRights26/07/21 01:02 AM
9

Summary: It is always men's fault, never women's fault.
/r/MensRights19/07/21 09:07 AM
6

Meanwhile, dildos exist...
/r/AntiFeminists09/06/21 02:25 PM
18

Well, she's right dude. Domestic violence by women is definitely not the same as domestic violence by women, because domestic violence by men is often punished, whereas domestic violence by women tend to go unpunished.
/r/MensRights14/05/21 12:45 AM
28

Men have always been the main provider, generally speaking. The problem is it comes to a point where men is seen as ONLY a provider and nothing else.
/r/AntiFeminists10/05/21 06:16 AM
4

I didn't know fathers giving their children a proper upbringing is considered weird. No wonder there are so many woke retards rampaging around and destroying the society.
/r/MensRights10/05/21 12:47 AM
1

In Singapore, NS means National Service. NS is not solely, and does not solely, comprise of military. NS covers all aspects of national defense, from military (external) to home defense or civil defense (internal). The general consensus is that women do not need to be forced into military roles if forced conscripted, they can easily fill up home defense and admin roles instead. Which is a fair point that many of us men agree, since we know that the female body is generally not as strong of a bui…
/r/MensRights29/04/21 05:37 AM
3

Sure. Then can you explain why, despite females are NOT being conscripted, the TFR for Singapore is only 0.87? Getting conscripted will NOT greatly decrease the TFR, considering that nowadays couples are also actually giving birth much later, mainly in the late thirties and early forties. Your point is rubbish.
/r/MensRights29/04/21 05:33 AM
2

Alimony is for the old system where men worked and women stay at home as housewives. It is outdated in Singapore because the majority of females are working, and dual-income families are the super majority. Alimony also doesn't apply in Singapore that way. Even if you managed to have a super strong case against that ex-wife, the law will force a zero dollar alimony on you. The underlying purpose is to tie you down on that alimony contract, so if the ex-wife suddenly decides she needs to start le…
/r/MensRights29/04/21 05:30 AM
2

It's a feminazi paradise. Females in Singapore have obscenely huge amount of abusable advantages over males. They can get away with so many stuff. And if you are female and elite/rich class? Heh.
/r/MensRights29/04/21 05:26 AM
2

It won't happen. The military top brass in Singapore are all croonies of PAP, the political party running the government with super majority.
/r/MensRights29/04/21 05:23 AM
2

Not just 2 years full time, but also an additional 20 years part time. Many feminazis like to downplay the fact that NS is only 2 years when in reality, it is 20+ years.
/r/MensRights29/04/21 05:22 AM
3

Yoz fellow Singaporean! There is also WC and AWARE, and the insane amount of influence and power they hold sway over the government. WC has outdated policies that are still mandated as laws in the country, whereas AWARE can influence the Singapore military forces into bending to their will despite women not being forced conscripted (Purple Light Contraversy). Not to forget our LEEder might just be a henpecked husband while that old witch wears the pants in the house. Not only that, the governmen…
/r/MensRights29/04/21 05:20 AM
7

Not just make sense, but also the cold hard truth.
/r/AntiFeminists28/04/21 12:58 AM
13

What's wrong with that? Feministsgoing naked and bare body in public is nothing new from what I heard. So what's wrong with men doing the same? That is gender equality no?
/r/AntiFeminists26/04/21 11:47 PM
7

Ain't paying to watch any shows with amber heard in it. Gonna sail the high seas if I wanna watch. They can go suck ass.
/r/MensRights20/04/21 02:08 PM
1

The civil unrest between feminazis and woke retards have been brewing for quite some time. I'm just waiting for it to explode into open war. Popcorn's on standby for it.
/r/AntiFeminists18/04/21 06:59 AM
1

Twisting words and logic eh? Fine, let me entertain you a bit. There are women who "cannot reach full potiential", same as there are men who "cannot reach full potiential". In that sense, there is nothing really sexist about it. Look at it this way. Women sleep their way up and become people of power backed by their powerful bosses whom they slept with. Can men do the same? Hardly. Why? Because sex favors women. Period. What I mean by social constrains on men is stuff of the following, invlusive…
/r/MensRights16/04/21 04:43 AM
7

Two points. Firstly, if the movement is about true gender equality, they won't have called it "feminism". Secondly, original feminism is to help those disadvantaged females, which applies in olden times or in a few specific countries in modern day. In most countries nowadays, females are generally on equal or more advantaged fighting terms compared to men. The difference is what the women choose to prioritise over.
/r/AntiFeminists16/04/21 04:22 AM
1

Sure. Blame it on the men right? What's new from feminazis.
/r/MensRights15/04/21 01:18 PM
6

In our language, we have a saying: 男人不坏, 女人不爱 Translated, it means women love bad boys. Another saying, this time in English, is "nice guys finish last". This is particularly true, because many women love men that give them excitement, that flutters their hearts and get it racing. Women generally are ruled by emotions, so anything that gets their heart racing will be deemed attractive in their eyes. Also, women are also very peer-approval reliant. If a man has many women flocking around him, oth…
/r/MensRights15/04/21 04:40 AM
11

Nope. MGTOW is just men not being tied down by society's clutches, but finding meaning in improving their lives without being trapped by society's biased constrains.
/r/MensRights15/04/21 04:17 AM
2

Because left-wing is dominated by woke retards and femininazis. Simple logic. Once they stop being dorminating, we move on to the next current scenerio. Voting for a certain party or side now doesn't means you are forced to vote for the same party or side for the rest of your life.
/r/MensRights09/04/21 04:28 AM
2

Simple. The one begging has no power neither is one in power. That alone should clear all doubts.
/r/MensRights09/04/21 04:22 AM
5

I call bullshit. If she intends to lie, she will never intend to confess openly. You are encouraging criminals to treat crimes as something to be written off as something trival, since confessing only nets them a bare minimum "punishment". A criminal needs to be treated as a criminal. Period.
/r/MensRights08/04/21 03:06 AM
8

I don't know. I mean, basically everything that comes out of a feminist's mouth is pretty much either vomit or dumb.
/r/AntiFeminists06/04/21 10:14 AM
7

Well, at least criminals know Wiltshire is an easy picking. Imagine having not to worry about the police force being able to take you down when you are commiting crimes or escaping form your crime scene. I shudder for the residents there.
/r/MensRights06/04/21 02:31 AM
2

I wonder how many of these have onlyfans page? Hmm... The mind wobbles...
/r/AntiFeminists06/04/21 02:27 AM
2

Dear Karen, No one gives a shit. Yours Truly
/r/AntiFeminists28/03/21 03:05 AM
14

If I had a son and this shit happens to him, I would personally go down and yell at the principal and all the staff involved and tell them to go fuck themselves. Then I will enroll my son to a different school because fuck them.
/r/MensRights25/03/21 12:43 PM
3

It's like we are rediscovering basic biology, something our forefathers centuries ago have know as common facts.
/r/AntiFeminists25/03/21 04:46 AM
14

Notice how she specifically points out "anyone with a Bachelor degree or higher", rather than just "medium salary". That is a perfect example of selective hypocrisy. :)
/r/AntiFeminists22/03/21 01:20 PM
17

This is what is happening in my country. We even have a meme about an interview on one of our local girls about forced conscription (National Service, or NS, it's called in my country).
/r/AntiFeminists21/03/21 01:10 PM
4

She is not a true friend. Period. Lose her and move on with life. A true friend will not have the "it's either my way or the highway" mentality. A true friend would either engage with you or don't talk about conflicting topics.
/r/MensRights19/03/21 02:03 PM
1

Those three responses from feminists that is in your post are perfect examples of sexual harassment being carried out against you. They are literally doing the things which they claimed most men are doing. Lolz
/r/MensRights19/03/21 02:08 AM
3

It's rubbish. If a person is so concerned about traumatizing their friends or family, they won't be suiciding, or will suicide somewhere far away where they won't be discovered. That is the stupidest comeback I ever seen.
/r/AntiFeminists18/03/21 01:49 AM
5

Hear! Hear!
/r/AntiFeminists17/03/21 04:11 AM
5

Brillant. Unable to rebutt with facts and reason, resort to personal attacks. You feminist retards are all classless, tasteless one-trick ponies.
/r/AntiFeminists12/03/21 01:58 PM
4

Do you know in my country, when a guy takes photo of a girl who's undergarments are visible in the photo, the guy can and will be arrested for sexual harassment? Sounds reasonable yes? Now what if I tell you when girls do the same to guys, they can even post the photos online, and the poor fellow get mocked online, yet the authorities does nothing. Yep, this kind of cases has happened countless times, and NEVER ONCE did the authorities take action. This is what exactly is happening to my country…
/r/AntiFeminists12/03/21 01:55 PM
12

I call bullshit on that. We boys are the ones who get caned left right centre, in school or at home. We are disciplined harder compared to girls. In our country, girls hardly got caned. Boys, on the other hand, getting caned became part and parcel of our child and teenage lives. Our schools even have public caning, and it has historically remained unbroken record of only boys being publically caned, no girls were subjected to public caning. At home, our parents disciplined us boys via caning, sc…
/r/AntiFeminists12/03/21 01:47 PM
5

Says want to unsub Still replying in this thread Lolz
/r/AntiFeminists11/03/21 04:59 AM
12

Feminists drawing conclusions based on scenerios in fiction movies. No wonder logic never works correctly with them.
/r/AntiFeminists08/03/21 09:26 AM
1

Well, you do know that is a section for feminists right? And you do know that feminists' opinion on gender equality is about females having all the benefits and power while men bear all the responsibilities right? Right? Right?
/r/AntiFeminists08/03/21 05:17 AM
9

Not just the west. I'm from an asian country, and this toxic shit has poisoned a good majority of our population. You know shit is real when even the companies talk about "diversity" and "unconcious bias" hogwash.
/r/AntiFeminists07/03/21 11:16 AM
20

My country's biggest example of women getting away with all kinds of crimes: https://forums.hardwarezone.com.sg/eat-drink-man-woman-16/noelle-teresa-thread-so-fast-got-deleted-again-5919945.html Noelle Teresa committed adultery, then stabbed her husband to death 11 times. The court took one year to issue a sentence verdict, a pathetic measly 1 year jail sentence, then proceed to BACKDATE the sentence to when the case started (you guessed right, 1 year ago). Essentially, Noelle Teresa Teoh Lee Qi…
/r/AntiFeminists14/02/21 11:16 AM
7

It's a privilege to be poor and homeless. Not every female gets to enjoy that.
/r/AntiFeminists04/02/21 05:44 AM
7

Even in chinese, it's also different. 男: Male 女: Female 他: He 她: She 人: Human / Person
/r/AntiFeminists27/01/21 08:44 AM
4

Wooo... Even rambo and john wick combined can't cause this much hurt and damage lolz Absolute respect for that savage slaughter.
/r/AntiFeminists27/01/21 08:41 AM
5

Feminist and logical reasoning are mutually exclusive. Remember this fact.
/r/MensRights16/11/20 03:11 AM
1

I think you got the very last word wrong. It should be "responsibility", not "equality". Lolz
/r/MensRights31/10/20 11:35 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter