TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SheSeesSounds Archive

View 0 posts and 24 comments by SheSeesSounds on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
9

https://www.adamdivorcelaw.com/contact-us/ They practice family law also. Maybe they can direct you to a recommended/affiliated practice that can support in your state.
/r/MensRights31/08/24 04:40 AM
1

both can be true, he left, she filed...
/r/MensRights12/12/23 05:03 AM
6

My Dad never worked "w2" again, lived with women and in his truck until he could start (due to disability) drawing va benefits, then married again, now getting social security too.
/r/MensRights29/11/22 05:16 AM
1

taking a nap
/r/MensRights22/09/22 09:19 PM
2

More Criminals: Those breaking the new proposed law. More Welfare: The social safety net may need to be a bit bigger for "some" of the additional children born due to the new proposed law. Those were my initial thoughts about tradeoffs that I was talking about. hbu?
/r/MensRights07/04/22 07:02 PM
3

What are we trying to accomplish here? Rather what are we thinking we're trading? Less fetus deaths for more what? children born. What are we likely to actually be trading for? mother deaths or more criminals or more welfare or larger families( aren't a chunk of abortions from pre existing families decision?)...or what say you?
/r/MensRights07/04/22 02:31 PM
1

Yes, when hr, admissions, interviewers are robots
/r/MensRights20/03/22 01:22 AM
2

I saw the payroll order for my own eyes on the copier. Gentleman was given 15k starting over lady counterpart with 8 yrs experience there in a call center tech support job. He was a veteran, so I told myself that must be why. its not impossible,. the odds are never 0.
/r/MensRights16/03/22 10:51 PM
1

I see a huge variance in interpretation of 'all their needs met'. That could range from being allowed to breathe to having a fully funded 18 years expenses plus a college fund. The kicker is that a parent is morally assumed to desire to want to have as many of a child needs met as possible. bad analogy coming: A four wheel vehicle will never have all its needs met, missing half of its tires, ever.
/r/MensRights30/04/21 02:22 PM
2

child support at best should only be for an individual that didn't maintain an income within the marriage for an amount of time. No marriage, no child support. No stay at home action for the last years of the marriage, no child support.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/04/21 01:11 PM
8

From reading the article, I see they shared a home at some point during her worsening state. Please, if this is anything like you, you fear for the children safety, please call the police and commit that person to mental health (psychological assistance) custody. I suggest as a drastic measure if the fear is that acute, because I know a woman who had to do so a few times for her boyfriend to get treated and stabilized.
/r/MensRights15/04/21 05:58 PM
5

oh my God, why did they ignore the prenup?
/r/MensRights14/04/21 04:28 AM
2

If we move toward child support only for biological children conceived in marriage, I fathom the birth rates will decrease a bit.
/r/MensRights23/03/21 03:24 AM
3

Forgive me, my mind went on a tangent on that poignant statement alone you made. And its a new thought I'd never considered. I don't have the breadth of context behind it, that you do. Just know that sentence shook something and hit home and makes me curious to reconsider more ideas I'd not challenged before. And That's all my sidenote revelation can be worth, I fear.
/r/MensRights21/03/21 06:18 PM
6

If we are to assume "they" were able to sanitise their own history, in a government majority run by men and in the applications of laws introduced, voted on, legislated and upheld, by majority of men legislators, can we safely deduce we have been in a matriarchy all along?? Im starting to wonder...
/r/MensRights21/03/21 04:35 PM
0

here is a fun calculator for Michigan, US. https://calculators.law/calculators/maintenance/michigan What's an income we don't like to pay alimony with, so i can put it in...
/r/MensRights16/03/21 04:42 PM
1

Before reading the comments: Alimony is most equal mathematically when both spouses earn and pull in close to the same income. I think it does have its purpose for the extreme stay at home spouse cases... After reading the comments: I think alimony should be applied when a stay at home party was at home and out of the job market for at least 3, 4 5 years. only then, 1 or 2 years alimony to get back out there. Alimony could be based on the average household income during those stay at home years.
/r/MensRights16/03/21 03:55 PM
2

squeaky wheel...
/r/MensRights12/03/21 04:12 AM
1

they are mistaken
/r/MensRights23/02/21 05:14 AM
1

Therapy, please consider, your future doesn't "have" to be what you said. I am enraged as well that has happened to you. I hope these comments can help you one step along the path of restoration.
/r/MensRights17/02/21 01:45 AM
1

Why does a male majority military infrastructure of decision makers allow these inequities to be, ever come to be and let alone "still" persist? I would naively think a headship of biased women were making these policies alone, with these outcomes being what they are...
/r/MensRights14/02/21 10:16 PM
2

infuriating and heart breaking
/r/MensRights05/02/21 01:52 PM
1

thank you , I am verrry intrigued reading and making some internal notes about the time correlation between reform and the ERA hubbub.. this is great reading
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/21 05:18 PM
2

Is there a post about "who" has built/litigated the current divorce system and its biases/assumptions, "who" is in office with power to modify the l system, and why that "who" hasn't updated said system? I'm starting to believe the "who" isn't as simple as 80% men/ 20% women lawmaker decisionmaking. Could it be that lawmakers are creating/enforcing laws against their own interest?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/21 05:59 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter