TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Sheairah Archive

View 0 posts and 97 comments by Sheairah on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

Being denied voting rights and therefore a voice in defining policy which may affect them (marital rape rulings, right to own a bank account, right to be unaccompanied in public spaces) is absolutely oppression. You’re arguing in bad faith.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 08:42 AM
5

There’s a cool feature called “Awareness Mode” so women can have headphones them mic’d into their ears and hear everything around them without seeming approachable.
/r/MensRights04/11/24 06:12 PM
9

From the article appears to be adults experiencing medical problems or choosing to do it for their own personal reasons. Exactly as it should be: When medically necessary or self-desired. One of the participants was a man who had badly damaged his foreskin attempting to self-circumcise and had it corrected by a surgeon during this event. Hopefully this will work to reduce shame in men who are experiencing issues/ hold different ideals for themselves and not encourage parents to request the proce…
/r/MensRights19/03/24 09:56 PM
2

How would they volunteer if they’re in a vegetative state?
/r/MensRights04/02/23 08:12 AM
–

Considering Zoomers are 25-27 MAX I really doubt that they’ve achieved longer lasting marriages than their older peers, especially if they’re also marrying later.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/22 05:36 AM
1

I said the data. As in your link. Which states that men never married or had kids rated their happier as at 4.1 vs women who never married or had kids who rated their happiness 4.2. Every data point on the linked table shows women rating themselves as (marginally, only .1 or .2 points higher) happier than men. Never married with kids Men: 4.2 Women: 4.4 Married with no kids Men: 4.3 Women: 4.4 Married with kids Men: 4.3 Women: 4.4
/r/MensRights29/10/22 03:37 PM
0

The data you shared still shows women being (marginally) happier when compared to their male counterparts in similar situations.
/r/MensRights28/10/22 10:20 PM
1

These studies show that women with children are losing happiness. Single women are doing fine. From your Guardian link: “Evidence supports the idea that women’s rights and roles in the home in the US and Europe have not moved in step with changes in the workplace. Therefore, because women with jobs often do most of the chores and childcare, they shoulder a dual burden that cuts into their sleep and fun. Long commutes are thought to make British women more miserable than British men because of th…
/r/MensRights28/10/22 03:18 PM
0

of course moms who get to stay at home have less stress than those that have to deal with the workforce. That’s statement is entirely contradictory to the claim that single childless women are happier. It also shows a lack complete of understating about the responsibilities of a SAHM on your part. Women who get to clock out and have their own time are leagues happier than women who are on the job 24/7 in their own home.
/r/MensRights28/10/22 03:11 PM
31

Source? Single women without children are frequently reported as the happiest subgroup.
/r/MensRights28/10/22 05:57 AM
1

The exchange between Soda and OOP of the comment thread goes; OOP: Feminism is literally the reason women have rights. Soda_BoBomb Nah Now they’re trying to walk back that statement and say that they never said feminism didn’t contribute to the expansion of women’s rights.
/r/MensRights25/09/22 02:57 AM
0

Stating that society gave women rights because they “realized” as if that could have occurred without feminism is subversion of the movement that powered women’s rights. Edit: Soda_BoBomb is a dirty deleter.
/r/MensRights24/09/22 08:12 PM
-2

You’ve already acknowledged that women had to be granted rights. Fairly recently I might add. A woman couldn’t open a credit card in her own name until 1974. Who was withholding these rights from women less than 50 years ago?
/r/MensRights24/09/22 07:38 PM
1

You’re subverting the notion that women worked and suffered for their rights when you say “society was realizing” in response to the idea that “feminism is literally the reason women have rights” What line of thinking do you suppose fueled the suffragist movement?
/r/MensRights24/09/22 07:31 PM
4

“Society” did not quietly realize that women deserved rights and hand them over. Womens’ suffrage in the US was achieved through strike. Striking that led to prison time and beatings from officers.
/r/MensRights24/09/22 07:26 PM
5

Holy fucking hell, anyone who offers you alcohol and then offers you up for sex with their friend IS a fucking garbage bag. Alcohol is not “liquid courage” it is a DRUG that impairs JUDGEMENT. You may NOT use alcohol to coerce someone into to choices you know they would not agree to sober and then blame them for it. Your comment is beyond concerning.
/r/MensRights24/01/22 12:21 AM
9

That’s state dependent. There are absolutely states that will prosecute someone for using intoxicants to perform sexual acts the other party would be otherwise unwilling to perform. Especially if they have prior conversations laying out their boundaries in the form of IM’s or texts.
/r/MensRights23/01/22 03:29 AM
-4

Alcohol is a drug. She got him intoxicated and put him a situation that he told her he was uncomfortable with while sober. OP did not make a decision they later regretted. They were deprived of their ability to fully consent and assaulted by someone who knew their boundaries.
/r/MensRights23/01/22 03:25 AM
-2

You aren’t using your better judgement when you are intoxicated. She KNEW he was uncomfortable with threesomes and chose to invite her friends to have sex with him after he had been drinking. She KNEW that she was lying when she said nobody would be home and had friends there anyway. She is absolutely in the wrong here. Putting a drunk person in a situation to do something you know they would not consent sober is not okay.
/r/MensRights23/01/22 03:20 AM
40

He was intoxicated and she put him on a situation that went directly against the wishes he has expressed to her while sober. She’s in the wrong here every day of the week and if you think plying people with alcohol is okay then you’re wrong too.
/r/MensRights23/01/22 03:11 AM
7

You were cheated and lied to. It was assault. She manipulated the situation to get what she wanted from you against your wishes. You even say that you’ve told her you are uncomfortable with threesomes but she put you in the situation after drinking with you because intoxicants make people more pliable. I’m sorry this happened to you.
/r/MensRights23/01/22 03:10 AM
1

Ever heard of Elliot Rodger?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/19 06:19 PM
2

Couldn’t this be reversed and pointed right back at the OP?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/19 02:55 AM
1

I don’t think it was supposed to.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/19 07:52 AM
0

/r/MensLib
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/19 08:32 AM
3

Would you elaborate on why a men’s rights movement could not move forward in tandem with feminism?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/19 08:17 PM
-3

Wanting emotional support is not the same thing as never wanting a solution.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/19 09:32 AM
4

Then what is your question? “Accepted” or “expected?” In legal terms within the US all sex that happened within marriage between two people was not rape participant be willing or not. That’s a legally engraved adherence to a social norm that women were expected to fulfill a husbands sexual needs all the way up the 1970’s for you. Of course we know it would’ve been socially preferable for women to choose to have sex with their husbands and many women did but it was so expected that a woman would …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/18 12:01 AM
4

So “Lie back and think of England?” https://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/close-your-eyes-and-think-of-england.html
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/18 11:47 PM
1

“In the United States, prior to the mid-1970s marital rape was exempted from ordinary rape laws. The exemption is also found in the 1962 Model Penal Code, which stated that "A male who has sexual intercourse with a female not his wife is guilty of rape if: (...)".[5]”)
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/18 11:39 PM
1

I agree with that statement. An LL will want to have sex less and an HL will want to have more. In a mismatched relationship the questions become: Can the LL push through when they’re not in the mood for sex? And Can the HL can accept that the LL won’t always be at peak excitement?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/18 11:29 PM
1

Sexual fulfillment is fundamental a sexual relationship and being able to reach it with a partner is generally the goal. People with highly mismatched libidos may not be good matches for each other. Some people like you can power through with a more demanding partner but other people will be better off with someone who’s libido is more in line with their own. Someone with a high libido may not be comfortable getting maintenance sex from a less than enthusiastic low libido partner. You’re obligat…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/18 11:04 PM
2

I get the idea that you don't believe a macro sexual economy exists in the first place. If you don't believe in the base of the argument how can your view be changed on the finer workings of it?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/18 08:12 PM
3

The Oneida Community practiced free love and a male birth control method called coitus reservatus (I do not recommend this method.) Not exactly the kind of community you describe as it was much more egalitarian in terms of who could sleep around.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/18 08:07 PM
1

That's a quote from someone OP is arguing with.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/18 01:32 AM
1

APALT.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/18 10:03 AM
1

It's purge week cut some slack
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/18 06:25 PM
1

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3800963/amp/Sharon-Harry-61-stabbed-boyfriend-chest-refused-sex-her.html
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/18 06:22 PM
1

And he thinks it makes him smart to hold this opinion and wave it around like a fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/18 05:14 PM
3

"People disagree with my vision of beauty and that's just downright wrong I say."
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/18 06:56 AM
3

What would you do in the scenario that he became addicted to drugs/started riding without a helmet again after you've had children?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/18 07:28 PM
1

What if that person has already stated they do not wish to engage with you sexually? You touching them in an attempt to escalate their arousal is your attempt to blatantly override their intentions. Touching your wife/husband/partner in the hopes of getting them to shag you, doesn't sound so bad as long as you're both of able body and generally get it on. Touching a stranger who has repeatedly rebuffed your advances in the hopes of helping them to "reach the point of enthusiastic consent" is beh…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/18 09:02 PM
4

Now that's just low, gum wrappers? Are you accusing him of buying silly frivolous things like GUM with his piles of dollars? OBVIOUSLY he would have built the plane out of monster cans providing the most mental stimulation during the build AND giving him a return on his investment when he scrapped the aluminum. You don't become a DUKE of Nonmediocrity without putting in the hard thoughts.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/18 08:16 PM
9

It's okay, he just forgot the other side of the coin. A man is a sack of mediocrity. I like to boil it all down. People are sacks of mediocrity. It's easier to remember.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/18 08:09 PM
2

furthermore equality is undesirable as a goal Elaborate?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/18 07:51 PM
1

You're so bothered by my accurate math. Why? I think it's pretty clear overall the guy didn't know what he was talking about and didn't provide an accurate representation of his preferences in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/18 06:56 AM
1

You're upset that I calculated the largest range possible given his preferences. Okay.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/18 07:21 PM
0

Looks like /u/killallthenarcs melted /u/LeJacquelope, anyone need a drink?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/18 07:39 AM
2

You aren't understanding my post. I never said he desired someone on the extreme end of the spectrum. I took the extreme ends and used them to create a range of BMI's he would find within his stated preferences. The highest BMI he would accept would be 22 and lowest BMI he would accept would be 15.5. What do you to not understand?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/18 07:20 AM
1

I expected you would have more than one example, preferably one not based on your faulty assumptions.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/18 07:05 AM
1

I didn't say that's what he was looking for. I created a range from lowest acceptable BMI to highest acceptable BMI by taking the two extremes. Run any numbers you want to get a BMI for any girl with X weight and Y height using his range and you will reliably get a BMI between 15.5 and 22.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/18 06:29 AM
1

That's disappointing.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/18 06:28 AM
1

My post illustrates the BMI range given his answer. 15.5-22. It hits the bottom of normal at best and unhealthy at worst.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/18 02:23 AM
1

Because she's looking for someone in a similar position to her- graduated and ready to start something serious.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/18 12:28 AM
16

If you want to have sex with other people then clear it with your spouse or get a divorce.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/18 10:19 PM
1

It's a picture with a silly filter thrown on. If utilizing technology to give yourself a funny bunny face is a deal breaker for you your bar may be a bit high.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/18 09:13 PM
1

Actually asking.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/18 06:07 PM
1

As long as a prostitute is performing the job of their own volition and you're paying them an agreed upon rate, I'd see it as more of a business transaction between people than objectification.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/18 10:49 AM
5

160cm-170cm or roughly 5'2"-5'7" 45kg-55kg or 99lbs-121lbs A girl who's 160 cm weighing in at 55kg has a BMI of 22. A girl who's 170 cm weighing in at 45kg has a BMI of 15.5. He's asking for women with a BMI between 15.5 and 22. A BMI of 18-25 is considered normal. His guess touches the low end of normal and reaches into unrealistic.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/18 10:30 AM
4

She could easily be a recent graduate. Please be better than me and than most men I'm curious about what else struck you this way.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/18 10:19 AM
3

When does girl #2 say she didn't attend university?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/18 10:03 AM
1

If you edit out the space between your > and the excepts the excerpts will look like this
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/18 09:50 AM
25

Tiffany seems more on the shallow side with her unwillingness to admit that her height preference is a real pool killer. If they had cut before the age question she would have hit her guesstimated number of matches (4/20.) Your description is disingenuous because Girl #2 was left with 1 guy. It was disappointing to see how many guys left after her selfie. She seems very aware of how her preferences shrank the pool. She overestimated her final match number (5/40) by 4. When the guy is asked how m…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/18 09:24 AM
2

Rinse and repeat.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/18 07:42 PM
3

Everyone gets money to pump back into the economy via purchasing goods and services. Rinse and repeat.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/18 10:13 AM
1

You're right I do need your help in the form of clarification so I can better explain /u/GriddRex's view to you. Please quote where it got muddy for you and we can dissect it together.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/18 09:28 PM
1

If you can't do the legwork don't start the race. I'm asking for clarification and if you can't provide it then I can't help you.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/18 09:24 PM
2

If you're referring to your responses through this particular chain I've read them and none directly state what you find confusing about /u/GridRexx's experience with attraction beyond the other girl said something different. Please clarify what part of her argument gets muddy. I will not comb your comment history when what you're confused about could come right from your mouth.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/18 09:21 PM
1

I'm interested in conversation. You seem to be interested in making wild statements with poor or no supporting evidence. I'm asking you to support your stance. If you can't do that I can't converse with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/18 09:15 PM
1

This isn't a classroom and I'm not your student to be assigned homework. Defend your statements or back down.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/18 09:14 PM
2

I'm not going to read your comment history to find the needle in the haystack so I'll say it again: Please quote a piece of /u/GridRexx's response you find "muddy."
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/18 09:13 PM
2

What exactly are you still confused about? Please quote a piece of /u/GridRexx's response you find "muddy."
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/18 09:07 PM
2

Thanks for the confirmation - women really don't know what their own attraction is, or if they do they can't articulate it, and men have a much better handle on women's attraction than women themselves do /u/GridReXX articulated pretty well how she experiences attraction. Her OP defines how she sorts men and then she described how a mans character and actions, or even her emotions, could move him from one slot to another. Is that so hard to understand?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/18 08:57 PM
2

Okay?? Varying people have various ways experiences of attraction. Who'dda thunk it right? That doesn't make anybody right or wrong. Don't tell /u/GridReXX she doesn't understand how her own attraction works because another commenter said it works differently for her. The human experience is wide and you can't "Ha, women. Can't even agree on how they experience complex emotions!"
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/18 08:40 PM
1

"Exactly- but not at all."
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/18 06:29 PM
1

these are good faith and honest questions Lmfao. You're not here to learn you're here to "gotcha" and it's pretty obvious in you're responses. Instead of understanding that attraction is malleable and situational like we're telling you, you're telling us don't really know how our own forms of attraction work.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/18 06:26 PM
2

YMMV because there an awesome variety of humans
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/18 06:18 PM
3

How does attraction feel to you? For me attraction depends on a the day. There are a lot of factors. Context is important, I'm much more attracted to my SO lounging in their underwear at home than I would be if we were are the supermarket. If I see an attractive person in line and then they start yelling at the top of their lungs about an expired coupon I'm instantly much less attracted to them than before they threw a hissy fit. If I see someone and categorize them as unattractive seeing them d…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/18 09:04 AM
1

It's useless to argue here about Feminism. They weren't around when Feminism was truly needed and I doubt many here could tell you about an event like the Suffragists Night Of Terror. It's something most of them never bothered to learn about or respect because they get all their information about feminism from each other and Tumblr.
/r/MGTOW217/02/18 09:39 AM
2

Personally I've known I did now want a husband or kids since I was 5 years old. Independence and self sufficiency hold more value to me than having a traditional family. I think traditional roles hurt everyone, men are expected to slave away and spend all their money on the wife/children while women are supposed to be good baby making house cleaning machines who shut up and listen to their husband (because he makes all the $$$.) I have no interest in being on either side of that dynamic.
/r/MGTOW229/01/18 01:58 AM
1

You seem like you're coming from an earnest place, and I agree that men's problems are vastly underrepresented and proper action is needed to recognize and begin to solve those issues. However I can't agree with a couple of things in or comment so while it may seem nice to just care about everyone, it means that one doesn't care about gynocentrism and male suffering. I disagree on the premise I do care about everyone, I want everyone to be free to live a life for themselves without violence or i…
/r/MGTOW28/01/18 02:32 PM
1

2- What is being described occurs in segments of the world where young boys are conscripted or killed in skirmishes. Again, same area. From the horses mouth. Are you brain addled? Be able to back up what you say. If you need to make it continent specific I'll be lenient. While I understand and of course respect the concept of sourcing, it is only really justifiable as a demand if the statement being made is outrageous in nature, or otherwise controversial. I don't think it's outrageous to think …
/r/MGTOW28/01/18 01:20 PM
1

You can't even be arsed to provide sources and justify yourself but consider yourself a smart and talented debater. Show me how common piles of dead boys are in Malwai. Show me some numbers that make me gasp and say "We really do need to put child mutilation on the back burner!" Instead of hollowly insisting Malwai is littered with dead boys. [This was published this in 2008 "According to the academic literature, the most widely used estimate is that approximately 300,000 children are part of re…
/r/MGTOW28/01/18 12:49 PM
1

Well I started my conversation with you over that one statement and you've been digging your heels into ever since. That's why I'm asking you. Straight answer. Children being sexually mutilated in third world countries, is it an insignificant problem? "Initiations for boys can easily go awry, since the circumcisions are often performed by people without medical training wielding ritual knifes. Last year in South Africa, an estimated 60 young men died after their initiation ceremonies as a result…
/r/MGTOW28/01/18 12:42 PM
1

The meme is about a leader fighting for equality, it is old school feminism mixed with what should now be called Equalism. Yep. Africa. I did ask you to provide sources for boys being killed in Malawi but you haven't posted any. I may do some digging on my own time. For now it's up to you. I don't think you know what "grand scale" means but I assume you mean to say child murder is more of a problem in Africa than genital mutilation, that doesn't mean genital mutilation is not a problem. Children…
/r/MGTOW28/01/18 12:40 PM
1

This conversation started over one statement. at the very least we can agree little girls having their genitals mutilated and then sold off to men several times their age when they're not even starting their sexual maturation are things to be reformed, right? That is an insignificant problem compared to the literal piles of boy-soldier carcasses on the side of the road that are actually not that uncommon in turmoiled areas. It simply doesn't mean anything to me to say "This girl is not going to …
/r/MGTOW28/01/18 12:31 PM
1

Care to address the actual topic? The mutilation of children resulting in life long pain and possible death is an insignificant problem. You agree?
/r/MGTOW28/01/18 12:22 PM
0

You don't get to make a random scale that caters to your argument. You pulled 2% out of your ass. What is that even supposed to measure? How much of a persons life has been affected by genital mutilation? Nobody said you have to care about the children being mutilated "over" the boys killed in skirmishes, simply acknowledge that suffering is suffering and more than a trivial inconvenience. By the way we're not talking only about young girls, we're taking about genital mutilation and if it's an i…
/r/MGTOW28/01/18 12:14 PM
1

I'm sorry reiterate your exact argument for me again? Because so far it seems to me that "Males being murdered in the random streets of anywhere should take absolute and total precedence over the children being discussed in this post who are suffering and dying from genital mutilation. Those children don't matter." Am I close? You should have read part of that article because I quoted it in one of my replies. Genital mutilation and sexual rituals don't only negatively impact and sometime kill gi…
/r/MGTOW28/01/18 11:50 AM
1

Did you read the article I linked? This woman is pushing to end sex initiation in Malawi, something which killed 60 boys in 2013. She's fighting for boys and girls. some nonsense about girls includes having their vaginas cut up by older women to varying extents which lead can lead to lifelong pain, sexual dysfunction, severe infection, and death. A minor inconvenience is the shops card machine going down. Being sexually mutilated is a whole other ball game. Read what is posted. Refute the whole …
/r/MGTOW28/01/18 11:31 AM
1

How about you address all parts of my comment? Like the fact boys are dying from genital mutilation just like girls. Are their deaths not important because they weren't murdered in the street? For the ones that live it was just a mild inconvenience and the fact that their community put them at risk for tradition doesn't matter at all? Be objective.
/r/MGTOW28/01/18 11:22 AM
1

That's a spot on evaluation
/r/MGTOW28/01/18 07:10 AM
4

It can be acknowledged that boys being murdered is worse but that doesn't make other serious problems minor discomforts. Do you have any sources for boys in Malawi specifically being murdered in the streets? "Initiations for boys can easily go awry, since the circumcisions are often performed by people without medical training wielding ritual knifes. Last year in South Africa, an estimated 60 young men died after their initiation ceremonies as a result of botched circumcisions and dehydration du…
/r/MGTOW28/01/18 04:14 AM
1

Comparing one problem to a worse problem doesn't make the original problem a non-issue.
/r/MGTOW28/01/18 04:07 AM
3

very minor issue To call what happens during a female circumcision a "very minor issue" is flat out wrong. Boys dying in the street is terrible and wrong. Worse than female circumcision? Yes, a chance to live will always outweigh death even if it comes with heavy pain. That doesn't make it a "minor issue." It's still terrible and it needs to be stopped. Non-consensual male circumcision needs to be stopped. Girls being kidnapped and sold as slaves needs to be stopped. Boys being murdered in the s…
/r/MGTOW28/01/18 04:01 AM
5

"Inconvenienced" they're mutilated and sold off to be the "wife" of a man who views them as an object to fuck and carry babies. That's what you call an "inconvenience?"
/r/MGTOW28/01/18 03:35 AM
1

This is so true. MGTOW and MGTOW are admirable movements but /r/MGTOW is so steeped in hate I'm not sure they're able to enjoy the lives they've deemed full control over.
/r/MGTOW227/01/18 07:28 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter