TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Shenmue654 Archive

View 1 posts and 29 comments by Shenmue654 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Originally we were sexist and racist, which created a localized group of people to compete. As more people entered the workforce, the economy reacted by becoming equally as bloated. Unfortunately. There's also the population increase. I'm no economist--- I'm not sure how to fix the conditions above. But I know we, the entering generation, should try whatever's necessary to keep our world running.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/14 05:04 AM
9

It seems to me like the smart thing would be to socially construct people to be whatever they're best at being. In a world where women are socially constructed to be "independent," I end up frozen under the weight of my own anxiety and paranoia. The conditions I must meet deviate from my natural state. But in the world where women actually were dependent, many more independent women were quite miserable. Enough to start a powerful movement at multiple points in history. There should be room for …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/14 04:56 PM
2

Quote: "I haven't watched much anime in a long time so this might be out of date, but look at Tenchi Muyo for a shounen example and Sailor Moon for a shoujo example. Tenchi is an honest nice guy and has a harem. In contrast, the male love interest of Usagi/Serena/Sailor Moon is mean, distant and mysterious." Yeah but note that Sailor Moon is herself an "honest nice girl" and the women that Tenchi actually dates. One is a princess (And the meanest character in the show). One (The "moe" character,…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/14 04:46 PM
2

Quote 1: " All confirmed they wanted to be better stronger faster more heroic in their childhood fantasy. n=0 for women, I haven't had a chance to ask anyone." Woman here, reporting. ;) I was an interesting case. As a child, a princess wasn't what I wanted to be--- I fantasized about becoming the evil queen. XD About coming upon power and about being consumed by it. About the conflict between having responsibilities and desiring normal relationships with people (The more powerful you become, the…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/14 04:37 PM
0

Quote 1: "I know, I know... You're using this as a figurative tool. But its too irresistible to not take advantage of it." Grins Taking advantage of shit is fun. Quote 2: "You're suggesting that its wrong to tell someone that can't do a job, that they can't have a job. And there isn't anything wrong with that but you're likening it to some sort of charity. But here's the reality: If they can't actually do the job, "giving them the job" isn't actually the job they were looking for to begin with."…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/14 07:54 PM
1

......trust me, man. Most women want to both fuck and marry a perceived "Alpha", not a perceived "Beta". And I'm basically refusing to fuck anyone at all until I find a guy I fall in love with. (Unless experimental fondling and foreplay counts as sex. ) Then there's the point that while every woman I've ever met is attracted to confidence, "confidence" means different things to different women. My best friend's attracted to men who are "betas" in my eyes, and I'm attracted to men who are "violen…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/14 10:41 PM
3

Quote: "I'd argue that by saying, who actually is serving who? The woman that wants to "serve". Or the service that has to accommodate that "service?" Sighs The general argument in this is like saying people with disabilities shouldn't have jobs. Some chance with help is better than no chance at all, both for society (Which now has to do less work to take care of them) and for the person (Who now has the means toward self-respect). As for the more specific military argument, that makes a lot mor…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/14 09:55 PM
1

Which is....interesting to say the least, and says more either about people or the past sexual history of our ancestors (Or both) than I ever needed to know. X3 I've got this one big time myself. ;}
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/14 09:46 PM
3

The context is different. If promotions are based on physical strength, and the test is used for judgments like that....it should be the same test. But if the test is used for getting into the military in the first place, it depends on whether a strong woman can physically meet the standards of the male test. Why? Lemme see if I can articulate this. Because if it wasn't that way then women in general wouldn't be able to enter the military and serve their country. Some women want to serve their c…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/14 08:03 PM
3

And an incredibly staged play where everyone knows what everyone else will say except the audience--- the jury. Who also can't know that the entire thing is a half-improvised play.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/14 07:30 PM
0

Lot of contradictory messages going around, then. But hey with any luck, frank conversation like on this particular subreddit can clear the air. :]
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/14 07:27 PM
3

Answer: Tough question, and I don't know enough about it (Not military) but yes. Everybody should be held to the same standard in the military, and women who want them should be given ground combat roles. If you're going to be equal, be all the way equal. Although again I'm as confused as the other posters. Does rank in the military have to do with physical strength? If the test is designed to test whether you're in good enough physical shape to be IN the military, it depends on whether a woman …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/14 06:56 PM
1

Probably for the better for both genders. Economically it also sucks. The way it is now, one man can't support his whole house on his own income because the economy is accounting for double the original workforce. This is creating frustration across the board, it seems. As for my speculations based on my experiences (Which granted are a little weird--- I hate stereotypes but hypocritically end up turned on by and obsessed with gender roles)....it's likely that some women feel pressured into ente…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/14 06:42 PM
1

The discussion on age and attractiveness is interesting to me here. As a relatively young woman, my own opinion is this: It depends, bluntly, on how powerful the men we're talking about are. A fat ugly 20 year old, just because he's young, can't compare to a well-muscled man in his forties. But if both men are attractive, it becomes a question of confidence and power. In cases where all things are equal, a man mid-range between their ages (I.E. In his thirties) comes off as the most attractive. …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/14 06:12 PM
6

Blinks .....honestly, I just want a universe in which a single breadwinner can theoretically uphold a household. And a universe in which I wouldn't be socially penalized for realizing that being a "strong, independent woman" actually severely stresses me out and that I'd be happier being somebody's sex princess. And I guess just a devoted wife when I get old. ;] Most of the changes I'd want aren't to current legislation, but to the economy. But, alas, this isn't a fairy tale universe. Sometimes …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/14 05:42 PM
4

Quote 1: "Vulnerable people technically aren't vulnerable, as they either presume they have nothing to worry about or they have that level of balls that they feel they can handle any potential fallout from being that open." I think this is too much of a generalization. Some vulnerable people are simply gullible sorts, and it doesn't occur to them that they should be hiding anything. In the case of a person with social deficits, sometimes you know you're supposed to be hiding something but not wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/14 05:30 PM
1

Interestingly, many women feel that they look more professional with short hair. Well not bald obviously, but still. :} Long hair seems either unkempt or "overly feminine." Economic reality sucks. X3
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/14 04:56 PM
1

Meaning seems like one seriously complicated beastie. o.o; I wonder why people don't just say what they mean. Hyperbole just angers people, but using passive voice for everything is being too politically correct. :P
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/14 04:53 PM
2

See, this....this I get. Because while I maintain that everybody should be able to do/feel whatever they want in society....this is me, or at least what I want to be. It's when RP members seem to be in the "anger stage" of ideology change and say stuff like "Women can't love/are completely selfish by nature" that I start becoming understandably (As a woman) pissed off. Because I just don't see nurturing and supporting as more selfish than providing and protecting. o__o; I....see them both as....…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/14 04:42 PM
1

Quote 1: "If your survival depends on it, then that's directly selfish." Of course it is. All human sexual behavior has selfish motives. Even according to RP dogma. Let us view it merely in that ideology for a moment. It's a convenient one for us both. Men wishes (Selfishly) to have sex with woman. Many women actually dislike the act of sex, and men are well aware of this. Domination is part of the eroticism for most men, and O'Brien of 1984 voices well what domination is. You would call that se…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/14 04:01 PM
5

While what I'm interested in sexually conveniently lines up with my expected social role (With a somewhat irritating economic exception) this just isn't even remotely the case for everybody.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/14 03:28 PM
2

Quote: "Now, women get the free pass when it comes to objectifying men because the things that are attractive to her are as much resource based as they are physical. C- physical attractive males of wealth or status will still yield an abundance of A+ physically attractive females." And I've never been exactly thrilled with that particular "free pass," either. It seems abundantly obvious to me that men are objectified quite often themselves, although its purest form is not as evident in American …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/14 03:21 PM
2

I think this whole virgin thing is honestly a little....insane. -___- There's no need to be ashamed over whether or not you've had sex. o.o; And if we want to decrease double standards then shouldn't we eliminate this one and not use it to another's disadvantage? If you call somebody else a virgin as an insult, you can expect to have the opposite insult levied at you.....
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/14 03:12 PM
3

Honestly he....seems right on the money here. You can't just say that every member of one gender is unimpeachable and every member of another gender is not. People should be respected for what they do with their lives. As for your mother, original poster, sorry about that one. We're not all pretentious gits. ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/14 06:29 PM
1

If the game of life were as easy as all that to play for either gender, it would hurt a lot less than it does. But the fact is, you're not giving nearly enough power to nurture in this equation. Which emotions and attitudes are beneficial for one's survival depend on context. .....in most of my relationships, I do not benefit from doing the selfish thing. My survival has been dependent upon my function as a "light" for others, a shoulder to cry on. A balm against the storm. This role doesn't eas…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/14 09:15 AM
2

Hmm. Lot of interesting responses I got, rational from every end of the debate. I like it. You guys rock. ;) Note I'm not sure how to quote yet: I was introduced to Reddit by a friend. Quote 1: "I admit there is a bit too much misogynistic language, which is not helpful. But when you strip that away, most of us just want to see the world for how it is." That's probably true. We live in a competitive little world, with each trying to find the "best" mate and the "best" life. And it makes sense to…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/14 09:43 PM
1

Short Term: Nothing. Just hugs. Some very sexy hugs. I'm in a relatively peaceful period. :p
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/14 09:44 AM
3

Relationship-wise? Ideally? Something suitably ridiculous. X) A very passionate, intense, egotistical advocate for something or another (Even if it's just themselves) with the willpower to actually try to accomplish their desires. A certain degree of amorality that allows the person to still function in society is highly desirable. Possessive tendencies are desirable if they are not abusive. I want to be this person's second-in-command, commander in chief of being great moral support and making …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/14 09:33 AM
1

This is a complicated question, with a complicated answer. The answer to the first question is "Yes, someone can have high self respect and choose to be submissive." The second question is "Yes, it is." In my particular case I perceive myself as "weak," but not "running scared" weak. It's more "Well shit, I can't punch the crap out of that guy. I think I'll go make a stronger bully do it for me, and then have him kill anyone who even looks at me funny. ......damn that's hot. And all I have to do…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/14 08:42 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter