TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SherlockHolmes- Archive

View 1 posts and 22 comments by SherlockHolmes- on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
31

Red Pill TheorySherlockHolmes-/r/TheRedPill09/04/15 11:01 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

tl;dr: In this context, intelligence is best seen as a means to an end: it is applied to attract women. What Rollo appears to argue is that intelligence, in itself, or intelligence directed toward pursuits that women consider boring or “nerdy”, does not do much to attract women, which is obvious. Saying nothing of the general quality of your content, this is one of your more unthoughtful posts. That women are not overly attracted to intelligence, in and of itself, is obvious. To say that intelli…
/r/TheRedPill18/04/15 03:25 AM
2

This is great. I laughed out loud at "Women seriously can't believe they've been with that many guys... so they don't."
/r/TheRedPill10/04/15 07:18 AM
1

This guy gets it. Thanks for this.
/r/TheRedPill08/01/15 07:42 AM
2

I don't think I'd even want to do that. It's better to meet at a bar/restaurant/coffee shop near your place because you don't know a) just how crazy the bitch could be and b) whether her pics are realistic.
/r/TheRedPill07/01/15 01:58 AM
6

Not a satire. Also: "'Mad men' is a historical term short for 'Madison Avenue' men, coined by the advertising industry itself, in typically self-promotional fashion. Madison Avenue, of course, has been synonymous with the advertising industry since the 1920s." Mad men being a play on "ad men" and "Madison Avenue", and you, of course, being a moron.
/r/TheRedPill06/01/15 09:59 PM
2

As someone with a lot of success via Tinder, I would just like to also note the following. You can escalate via Tinder if you're good looking and write/think well. Women love to use their imagination. Once you break the sex-talk barrier via Tinder innuendo, start playing out scenarios of what you'd do to her, keeping it playful. I've done this numerous times. What does it do? Once I meet her in person, it's on very quickly. A few drinks at the local restaurant, it closes, "I have a bottle of win…
/r/TheRedPill06/01/15 09:01 PM
0

Nobody is arguing about the morality (or, at least, I was not referring to any such discussion). I think the real debate is whether fucking married women is pragmatic irrespective of morality and that's how I've seen it play out lately in this forum.
/r/TheRedPill30/12/14 03:01 PM
7

Of course I'm discussing the pragmatism of fucking married women. That's exactly what the other side is discussing when it obviates philosophical (here, moral) considerations.
/r/TheRedPill30/12/14 02:35 PM
6

There's some solid insight here. Thanks. But don't forget that there's a distinction between surviving and surviving through your children, both of which are biological imperatives. The labouror may improve his posture because he is likelier to live longer as a result (survival); he could also do it to appear more attractive to a woman (survival through children).
/r/TheRedPill30/12/14 12:04 PM
101

What is TRP? First, we do not all share the same interpretations of RP theory, nor do we all direct RP theory toward the same ends. For example, for me RP theory is unique in its (male-dominated and often rational) conceptualization of heterosexual relationships. Some of the theories, field reports, and discussions I peruse here help me make sense of society, particularly females within it. The pursuit or goal is naturally happiness, which is easier achieved by not being crushed by propagated il…
/r/TheRedPill30/12/14 11:56 AM
27

On the one hand, I think it's important to hear about field reports that expose women's behaviour that is mostly hidden in our day-to-day lives (even for those of us who have sex often and with many different women). But this post is merely a validation of what we already know: AF/BB, even to the extent that those in relationships, engaged, or married will succumb with little guilt. But hear this, please: Sleeping with married women is dangerous. If you sleep with a guy's wife who's an alpha and…
/r/TheRedPill30/12/14 07:43 AM
12

Preliminary We do not all share the same interpretations of RP theory, nor do we all direct RP theory toward the same ends. For example, many posters here (including endorsed or popular posters) are unintelligent and have absolutely no idea what they’re talking about, despite tremendous confidence and condescending attitudes; however, they still have insights to offer (for example, GayLubeOil and IllumitableMan are poor writers and lazy thinkers, but some of their posts are insightful). AWALT is…
/r/TheRedPill26/12/14 09:58 AM
10

This is a very good and well-articulated point. Thanks
/r/TheRedPill26/12/14 09:12 AM
16

This, 100%. Machiavelli has taught us well: Everyone sees what you seem to be, but few touch what you are. Being Alpha means not appearing as such when it benefits you. The whole "always be yourself" despite the consequences thing isn't productive if you have to work your way up from the bottom.
/r/TheRedPill22/12/14 07:15 PM
5

Let me put it into basic terms so everyone can understand: If I had sex every day with hot women, but such sex was attained predominantly via roofies (i.e. I was raping the women)--this is the "how"--and I was only engaging in such sex because I was seeking validation in women and because I was lonely and torn up about a past relationship--this is the "reason for"--then I am clearly not much closer to being RP than someone not having as much sex. The point being, of course, that Hank Moody is no…
/r/TheRedPill17/12/14 11:59 AM
43

I note the sarcasm, but that's a major problem with this sub. Getting laid on a regular basis is not prima facie RP; how one gets laid often and their reason for having sex often is what makes one RP. It's a clear distinction for those of us more in the know.
/r/TheRedPill17/12/14 11:14 AM
36

Hank Moody? Are you fucking kidding me? The guy's a wreck.
/r/TheRedPill17/12/14 10:47 AM
11

She has implicitly (well, basically explicitly) broken things off with you. If a chick said to you, "Dude1692, I don't want to see you anymore" what good would it do you to respond with "why"? If your answer is something along the lines of, "I'll learn from my mistakes," let me give you a piece of advice: You will learn more from self-reflection. In fact, women are prone to lie in these situations, especially when there's another man involved, so you're likely to become more distanced from The T…
/r/TheRedPill17/12/14 10:43 AM
18

From the article: The “bad news” about men is always couched in the context that men aren’t “manning up,” or doing what’s necessary to be responsible adults. Perhaps they aren’t — they’re certainly retreating from marriage, that’s for sure. The question is, why? And the answer is simple. With premarital sex a foregone conclusion and cohabitation on the rise, men live the good life with no responsibilities. Moreover, women have made it clear they don’t need a man to support them, to be happy, or …
/r/TheRedPill17/12/14 10:24 AM
4

When one makes a claim, the onus of proof is on them to demonstrate its veracity. For example, if I told you that there was a small teapot rotating around the sun, would it be reasonable for me to tell you, after you object to such a statement, that because you decided to object you now should be burdened with explaining why I'm wrong? Not even that! To "expound on why I'm wrong"!? You are falling victim to a lazy thought process--that utilized by, among other sad individuals, the ultra-religiou…
/r/TheRedPill17/12/14 09:30 AM
3

This study is very well done. Note how many claims are linked to studies so that one can examine their veracity. This is how studies should be done. Furthermore, this is precisely the type of content that we should be after: well-researched and logical analysis of topics of interest--namely how humans, particularly women, think. Now, a lot of people on here are like "penis size, height, and shoulder-to-hip ratio matter--no shit!" The takeaway here is not that each matters but rather to what exte…
/r/TheRedPill17/12/14 09:23 AM
2

There are a number of ideas that might be forwarded for the utilitarian approach adopted by triceratraps. For example: *there is a positive correlation between sexual promiscuity prior to marriage and infidelity within marriage. There is a positive correlation between infidelity and divorce. Divorce often leads to children being raised by single parents. Therefore, there is a positive correlation between sexual promiscuity prior to marriage and children being raised by single parents. *Women who…
/r/TheRedPill17/12/14 08:27 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter