TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Shiningknight12 Archive

View 0 posts and 218 comments by Shiningknight12 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Lifting is cardio though. Doing a 5x5 squat will get your heart rate up.
/r/TheRedPill25/07/15 12:54 AM
1

Plus the absurd level of obesity and knowledge of what our kids would look like.
/r/TheRedPill25/07/15 12:43 AM
0

Its cause nobody else will date them. If they lose the black guys too they are screwed.
/r/TheRedPill25/07/15 12:43 AM
5

Bingo. When my SO has kids, she will qualify for the Earned Income Tax Credit and a big Obamacare subsidy because we aren't married. I could marry her and cover those costs, but why would I if the government gives me money to stay single instead?
/r/TheRedPill25/07/15 12:34 AM
2

I would distinguish between Catholics and the Catholic Church. The Church encourages nuclear families. It just sucks at it and Catholics ignore what the church says.
/r/TheRedPill25/07/15 12:32 AM
3

As a couple, it also discourages marriage The earned income tax, for instance, heavily favors single people. So does Obamacare(which substitutes for Medicaid). However, I will note that if the single mother is getting child support, several of those benefits become less appealing as child support is expected to reimburse Medicaid and CHIP.
/r/TheRedPill25/07/15 12:31 AM
8

Its mostly a problem in large cities in the US. Places like New York City or Seattle that give big subsidies to the poor create areas of the city that are permanently poor.
/r/TheRedPill25/07/15 12:22 AM
1

The best you can do is use positive reinforcement when he does do alpha things or lead. Paradoxically, telling him to be a leader is in itself assuming the leadership position.
/r/RedPillWomen24/07/15 11:44 PM
1

But that is happening. There was a post earlier today showing that teenagers are far more likely to be virgins than they were 20 years ago.
/r/TheRedPill24/07/15 11:38 PM
2

The problem with this is it assumes that evolution is driven at a societal level. Its not. On the contrary, we are at a point where, no matter how many kids you have, they are guaranteed not to starve to death. With this level of abundance, evolution will heavily favor rapid breeding. There is no genetic advantage to delaying reproduction.
/r/TheRedPill24/07/15 11:34 PM
1

It might pop, but not because of people waking up or anything. Studies are showing that teenagers are more likely to be virgins than 20 years ago and even in the 20s crowd, people are having fewer sexual partners than they used to. My hypothesis is that beta guys are using internet porn as a substitute for women. This is going to make the market for marriageable men much harder to get into for women.
/r/TheRedPill24/07/15 11:31 PM
2

IUDs have a very low failure rate(less than 1%). Its far more likely she wasn't on birth control.
/r/TheRedPill18/07/15 02:01 PM
1

http://www.theonion.com/article/girlfriend-changes-man-into-someone-shes-not-inter-1507
/r/TheRedPill18/07/15 01:59 PM
8

Appearing wealthy is a great way to get hookups. Just don't wife them.
/r/TheRedPill12/07/15 10:24 PM
3

Letting them know you have money is great for getting laid. Its a terrible idea for finding a LTR.
/r/TheRedPill12/07/15 10:24 PM
0

Counter-intuitively, the guy making 3k is arguably in a stronger position. I know a guy like that. He treats his wife poorly and gets away with it because she will be completely broke without him. He doesn't make enough that alimony will give her a comfortable lifestyle and she isn't attractive enough to get a better guy. But the guy earning 8k a month will have savings and property+can afford a nice alimony payout.
/r/TheRedPill12/07/15 10:23 PM
2

A 35yo man making $3000 a month would not suspect that a 35yo woman is interested in him because he gives stability. A 35yo man making $8000 a month is well aware that lots of 35yo women are interested in him because he in financially stable. Whats funny is the guy making 3k is arguably in a better position. I know a guy like that. He treats his wife poorly and gets away with it because she will be completely broke without him. He doesn't make enough that alimony will give her a comfortable life…
/r/TheRedPill12/07/15 10:22 PM
7

Actually, most people will consider themselves exclusive when they start calling each other boyfriend and girlfriend. The thing about Reddit is that it has a serious hardon for open relationships. Its frequently suggested as the solution to relationship problems.
/r/TheRedPill12/07/15 10:14 PM
1

7: if she checks out, and you want more, pre nup or gtfo. No questions asked. If she resists even in the slightest, you made a misjudgement, get over it, there are others My only issue is that this assumes "marriage"=more. I don't see what you can get from marriage than you can't get from living together unmarried.
/r/TheRedPill12/07/15 09:51 PM
3

If you are just looking for hookups, bringing up money is a good way to get them though. Obviously you don't enter an LTR with a gold digger, but nothing wrong with sex.
/r/TheRedPill12/07/15 09:49 PM
1

Well there is no cost to me as an individual for having my name and job history on Linkedin.
/r/TheRedPill20/06/15 08:55 PM
1

Women suck, sure, but so do men, because most people suck. The Red Pill is focused on male-female relationship dynamics. If you want to read about how crappy men are to each other, nobody here would disagree. It just isn't the focus of this subreddit.
/r/TheRedPill20/06/15 07:43 PM
2

I think you overestimate sex workers. Most of them are broken/crazy. Not rationalists making a business transaction.
/r/TheRedPill19/06/15 02:03 AM
0

Doing martial arts so that you can "fight those guys off" is a bad mindset. Street fighting is dangerous and should be avoided. My main advice would be to not engage or escalate if guys want to start something with you. If neccesary, play the wimp card. These guys will try to provoke a fight, but they will rarely fight you if you don't engage. Edit: If you want to actually win a fight, bring a knife or a gun. If you aren't willing to stab or shoot someone, then the fight isn't important enough f…
/r/TheRedPill14/06/15 11:29 PM
30

The problem is that /r/fatpeoplehate had very proactive moderators. They had rules against linking to other parts of Reddit or revealing personal information and they strongly discouraged people from going onto other sites or subreddits.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 02:27 AM
0

I'd do the exact same thing if I were smart and hot. Stripping sure, but porn vids end up on the internet and have long term consequences. 10 years from now that girl will no longer be pornworthy but her name will still show up on Google.
/r/TheRedPill31/05/15 09:44 PM
1

Given how screwed up people in porn are I doubt they want to date each other.
/r/TheRedPill31/05/15 09:38 PM
-1

so it would be near impossible to sweep it under a rug. Not sure about this. Most of them don't use their real names. There is so much porn out there its unlikely someone will stumble across a video of you from 5 years ago.
/r/TheRedPill31/05/15 09:34 PM
0

Fair enough. In my industry they are mostly interesting in checking boxes to show they are diverse. If you have a woman on the team but she doesn't do any real work, they don't care.
/r/TheRedPill31/05/15 08:13 PM
2

You are right in that I don't live in Silicon Valley. Where I live rent starts at 500 a month and while wages are lower, wages scaled to cost of living are much higher. It would be a much better deal to hire h1b employees there.
/r/TheRedPill31/05/15 06:02 PM
1

Thats very expensive though. You have to pay the h1b salary and deal with immigration.
/r/TheRedPill31/05/15 03:24 PM
2

these agencies always want to know which people you're going to put on the team You could always put your accounts payable lady on the team(on paper) and just not have her actually work on the project. Give her a nice title like "Project specialist" and say she is responsible for coordinating the different workers and giving guidance.
/r/TheRedPill31/05/15 03:23 PM
18

The feminists and SJWs don't have a hope of being engineers anyway. They are just trying to cut down on the prestige of the field and elevate their own by claiming they are kept out by sexism.
/r/TheRedPill31/05/15 03:19 PM
-4

Which just means that as long as they don't get charged with the same thing again, they are free.
/r/TheRedPill31/05/15 04:44 AM
-7

I would definitely recommend against rock climbing or motorcycling as hobbies. There are much safer hobbies that still give good stories.
/r/TheRedPill31/05/15 04:13 AM
4

The judge actually dismissed the charges. It really was just the police harassing dudes.
/r/TheRedPill31/05/15 04:07 AM
59

On the flip side, I have found that the amount of chores that need to get done far more than doubles when I am living with a woman. They tend to fill the house with shit and have a much higher standard for messiness.
/r/TheRedPill31/05/15 04:00 AM
12

Eh, flirting with customers gets you higher tips. If I was a woman I would do it too.
/r/TheRedPill31/05/15 03:28 AM
8

Its tough. Largely because women will try to make you unhappy when they are unhappy. Your only recourse then is really to leave.
/r/TheRedPill31/05/15 03:26 AM
5

Playboy has lost a lot of ground.
/r/TheRedPill30/05/15 07:12 PM
3

Very unlikely. France has banned them(without mothers consent, which she won't give). And up until a decade ago Germany did too. US is much more individualistic than either of those countries though.
/r/TheRedPill30/05/15 07:03 PM
2

There are conflicting feminist ideals. The intent of those articles is to have men do more of the child rearing to take the burden off of women.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 11:30 PM
1

I actually mentioned that in another post. I live in small town Texas and used to live in Austin. huge difference.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 10:58 PM
5

These programs are an attempt to eliminate responsibility for women at all costs. You married and had kids with a boring loser? Here! Have him pay you so you can end the relationship and go fuck other guys while keeping the kids. Where its failing is that guys have free will and those of us who aren't super thirsty are opting out of the system, which is leaving women who actually want commitment out in the cold.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 10:53 PM
4

Japan has a better approach to this. Japan has its own issues though, in particular a very large elderly population this is going to take a lot of money to support.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 10:47 PM
1

In the US, both parties have to explicitly agree to marry for common law marriage to come into effect(and in most states common law marriage is just not legal).
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 03:45 AM
9

Women are hypergamous, but really, not all of them do one night stands. A fair number actually do stick to sex in relationships. I have found it does depend on geography a lot though. When I was in Austin, most of the women were sluts. Now that I am in a smaller more conservative area, most of them are monogamous.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 03:43 AM
2

What if you want a stable environment where you wish to raise children with the support of someone else that you know will love them beyond her own life? By all means, live with her. Have kids. Stay loyal and provide for your family. Just don't marry. Marriage doesn't provide stability so long as no fault divorce is the norm. All it does is put you in a position of weakness in the relationship. I have contemplated writing a contract including the terms of your relationship and penalties if one p…
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 03:33 AM
1

Which is why I would not object to signing a contract promising her money if I abandoned her or cheated. The issue I have with alimony is that it comes attached to no fault divorce.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 03:29 AM
3

Churches can provide social pressures to stay faithful and stick together, which is seriously lacking in modern culture. Its definitely not ideal but better than nothing.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 03:24 AM
4

That 'piece of paper' does give you certain rights, mostly around your kids. Not true in any country I am aware of. Bastardy laws have been done away with and being the father gives you the same rights if you are married or unmarried.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 03:22 AM
2

Those examples were actually generous. For example, in Example 8 if Person Two had earned 5 dollars that year instead of nothing, she would have qualified for EITC, which turns the 2271 dollar "win" for marriage into a 300 dollar a year loss.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 03:21 AM
1

To make it even better, if one partner is making less than 38k, then you lose the Earned Income Tax Credit from marrying. There is a fairly narrow window where you actually net money.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 03:11 AM
0

The Tax Benefits thing is sort of a myth as well. There are benefits, but there are tax penalties to marriage as well. Especially if you have kids. Most couples will pay fewer taxes if they have kids while unmarried than if they get married.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 03:08 AM
3

Ironically enough, the feminist movement to encourage slutty behavior has done a lot to hurt the ultimate goal of marriage. When guys are getting sex from LTRs or hookups, they are much less starved for marriage sex.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 03:05 AM
1

The principle is right but it's actually a bit harder than that depending on the location. In Texas, you have to be together for a long period of time to get alimony. And the "half his stuff" only applies to money and assets acquired after getting married.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 03:03 AM
2

I generally agree, but you are implying marriage and being single are the only option. An LTR with a good woman is mutually beneficial if thats your thing. You don't need to be married to enjoy that.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 03:01 AM
10

Feel free to share your thoughts on what it means to be a Red Pill man that wants to have children with an ideal mate, and raise them properly. AWALT is true, but that doesn't mean women are identical. They all shit test, but not all of them are going cheat or fall for the first guy who is slightly more alpha than you. The corollary to this is some women will make terrible partners know matter how good your married game is. Dread game works differently in these relationships. You don't want to d…
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 02:28 AM
47

I know hardly any young women that still want monogamy. Confirmation bias. Almost all of the young women(early to mid 20s) I know either want to be single or in a monogamous relationship. And statistics show that the majority are still aiming for monogamy. The reason it appears that way is that women who want to be sluts are hanging out with other sluts, while women who want monogamy hang out with other women who want monogamy. If most of the women you know want polyamory, you are just in a slut…
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 02:22 AM
2

Yep, but she can't leave because I am betting he earns most of the money. What gets me is that these guys could run the relationship if they alphaed up and dread gamed her. Yeah, a breakup would suck for him, but it would suck far more for her.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 02:19 AM
4

Reddit at large has a serious boner for these type of people. I have gotten a lot of hate for commenting that you should avoid people with messed up lives.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 02:05 AM
12

Hey this doesn't mean you can't date bi women. Women who describe themselves as bisexual tend to have issues. I view it as a red flag.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 01:53 AM
44

I think you spend too much time on this subreddit. Marriage is declining, but people are generally going for serial monogamy. And there isn't much evidence cheating is any more prevalent than it was 20 years ago.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 01:48 AM
11

Unfortunately there really aren't any better 1st world countries. The US gives welfare to parents and the disabled, but many countries are bankrolling unemployed adults too.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 01:33 AM
7

Who get the better treatment here? I will add that this system isn't good for the women either. It promises a glamorous life but screws them over in the long run. For one, most of them suck at finances and generally only afford these extravagant expenses thanks to debt. Second, at some point the kids move out and the welfare, child support and (most of the time) alimony payments stop coming in. Then the single mother has to move in to low income housing and ends up working at McDonalds at 50.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 01:31 AM
1

This guy has the attention of 18 to 20 year old college pussy daily. Availability is only half the battle. You need the will to act as well. It doesn't matter if you can have sex with other women if your wife thinks you won't do it. If she is convinced you won't leave her and you won't cheat, then dread won't work.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 01:24 AM
3

As a man in a western country, I see no reason to marry my partner. All it does is transfer wealth from me to my wife on an indefinite basis. If I want to give my LTR money or stuff, I will, but I see no reason to make it forced.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 01:10 AM
2

The main issue is that people do have an instinct to pair bond, but go into marriage with no strong goals or roles in the relationship. Maybe they feel like having a kid or two, but past that they have no metric to judge whether their marriage is successful. So they go off of feelings, and when things get hard they leave.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 01:07 AM
11

I know for a fact marriage rates are declining quite rapidly. Here is one source on the issue. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/08/fashion/weddings/falling-marriage-rates-reveal-economic-fault-lines.html Divorce rates have slowly declined as well, but thats mostly because people are spending less time married.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 01:04 AM
2

It happens in other countries. Australia, for instance, does not require the consent of the couple for them to be labeled as married. If you live together for a certain length of time, you are automatically considered married. I just hope that other countries don't institute similar laws to deal with couples living together but not marrying.
/r/TheRedPill26/05/15 10:16 PM
2

Change isn't going to occur through a revolution. Its going to occur through gradual changes in voting patterns and sexual market. Marriage and birth rates are plummeting. Honestly, I suspect the biggest threat won't be TRP, but porn and video games.
/r/TheRedPill26/05/15 12:20 AM
2

I doubt they will reference us specifically. Reddit very rarely makes mass media and its huge. The best that would happen is that other people will reference the content without the source, like happens with most of Reddit. You do see mainstream medias do pieces on men's rights or The War On Men.
/r/TheRedPill25/05/15 11:43 PM
4

Texas here. Common law marriage requires the couple agree to it. So long as you don't claim to be husband and wife, you aren't.
/r/TheRedPill25/05/15 10:31 PM
6

Which boils down to "don't tell her about your problems until you have already solved them". The real deep down issues are ones that you haven't resolved.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/15 10:31 PM
3

There is this misconception that marriage somehow protects your relationship. If you are poorer than your spouse, sure, but as a rich doctor it only gives your LTR a bigger reason to leave you.
/r/TheRedPill25/05/15 09:58 PM
2

At 28, the girl is probably having a breakdown over the impending wall.
/r/TheRedPill25/05/15 09:56 PM
-1

and the pool of eligible dick is shrinking for the women. Which wouldn't really matter for "sluts" as the OP defined them, because sluts are having casual sex or one night stands not monogamous relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/15 09:24 PM
1

I am not denying that, but when the OP was talking about sluts, he was referring to women who are having one night stands and casual sex. Not serial monogamists.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/15 09:23 PM
3

I am aiming for the same. Fortunately we live in rational areas that don't force marriage on you.
/r/TheRedPill25/05/15 09:21 PM
7

they treated the same situation as if it was a marriage. This comes down to location. I am happy to live in a state without mandatory common law marriage. I recommend every man move to such a state if he doesn't want to marry but wants to have kids.
/r/TheRedPill25/05/15 09:20 PM
2

You could get most of those benefits by living with a woman and having kids with her without getting marriage. This gets most of the benefits without any risks. This may cause issues for the older generations, but millennials are putting a much lower value on the marriage certificate.
/r/TheRedPill25/05/15 09:19 PM
3

The risk is high, very high, but it doesn't always end in divorce rap Why marry instead of just live together though? I will take risks for a reward, but there is little reward for marrying.
/r/TheRedPill25/05/15 09:17 PM
3

http://time.com/3846289/boomers-generations-millennials-sex-sex-trends-sexual-partners/ You are self selecting. There is a huge difference in attitude at a college campus versus in a small city.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/15 09:15 PM
8

Younger generation is actually having fewer sex partners on average. The problem is selection bias in who you hang out with. http://time.com/3846289/boomers-generations-millennials-sex-sex-trends-sexual-partners/
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/15 09:13 PM
1

I don't think the subreddit or blogosphere will ever get big, but men in general are coming to the same conclusions. I realized at the age of 14 that something was off with how dating and marriage traditionally worked. Lots of guys my age have. I suspect the US will become more like Europe, where people have fewer kids and those who do are more likely to have them out of wedlock. Even as a guy who plans to have kids, I have no intentions of marrying.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/15 09:05 PM
1

If so, why hasn't it been working for the past few decades? It has worked. Look at Japan, the country that fat shames the hardest. In the US, mainstream culture is all about body acceptance and other people accepting you for who you are. Fat shaming is making a comeback but it's still a minority view.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/15 08:56 PM
1

then start treating fat people like people I treat them like adults who should be able to take care of themselves. Its no different to me than someone who chooses not to shower.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/15 08:54 PM
2

These type of "studies" can show anything you want if you manipulate the data right. If you look at actually societies, Japan demonstrates that when fat shaming is a built in part of society, people are far more likely to stay thin. Can you point to a society that coddles fat people while maintaining a low obesity rate?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/15 08:50 PM
1

But if they have mental health problems, which many extremely fat and extremely thin people do, "social shaming" might not be so good for them. The assumption here is that people are fragile and need to be coddled or else they will break down. This has resulted in 2 generations of people who are neurotic and don't know how to face difficult situations. I don't want to build a society around that. I want to live in one where people are pushed to confront their problems instead of pretend they don…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/15 08:48 PM
2

The situation is not nuanced in the slightest, there is no avenue of debate open here... You say that, but its incredibly common behavior. And many guys actually buy into it.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/15 08:43 PM
3

Any non-autistic man with a healthy self-esteem would not fall trap to such trivial manipulation attempts You say that but its extremely common.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/15 08:42 PM
10

Well there you see another aspect of the reason courts don't punish nearly enough actual rapists either Its not perfect, but women do have several avenues to defend themselves from a rapist. They can carry a weapon and use it to stop him. They can press charges. They can get a restraining order, which has a much lower burden of evidence than a rape conviction. By contrast, there is no such defense against mattress girl. You can't sue her, get a court order for her to stop or stop her yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/15 08:13 PM
3

You are underestimating he much men love their dogs.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/15 08:09 PM
13

I think that's not necessary. Most women feel the same. They will pry constantly to try and get the guy to "open up", but they will lose attraction to him if he actually does show serious weakness.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/15 08:08 PM
8

Women are twice as likely to end a marriage as men. So , on average, a woman is definitely more willing to dispose of a man than a man is to dispose of his wife.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/15 08:05 PM
7

Now you are trying to define certain things as "not love", which isn't going to solve anything. Men have these feelings they interpret as love that are different from feelings women interpret as love.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/15 08:01 PM
4

This girl was enthusiastic though. Look at the court logs. She didn't claim rape until afterwards when he refused to date her.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/15 07:58 PM
7

The problem is the laws and legal precedence around rape are set up such that the courts won't punish someone for making up rape claims.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/15 07:52 PM
2

Why does he have to be a liar ? Well you know for a fact he is a liar. He has lied to other women as he is a PUA. You also know he is good enough at lying to convince other women to sleep with him. I doubt any of them noticed his lies either(at least, not for a while). The only thing in question is whether he is lying to you. People can change, but its rare. So chances are he is willing to use the same techniques on you that he uses on other women.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/15 07:47 PM
3

, but he seems pretty honest and straightforward Seeming honest and straightforward is vital to a pickup artist. No succesful pickup artist will come off as deceptive. It would be much weirder if he claimed to be a PUA but was a terrible liar.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/15 07:39 PM
6

but it depends on the neg. And this is why red pill tactics work even on women who are aware. If its done well, women will rationalize away the behavior as "not a neg" or "not dread game". TRP has never claimed that you will have 100% success with women. Just that by using these techniques correctly you can improve your chances.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/15 07:35 PM
4

Guys who naturally attract women can, but those who don't need to adjust their behavior. You do this through forming good habits and practicing.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/15 07:33 PM
4

Or just he knows how to flirt. Knowing how to flirt is a pickup technique. It serves no purpose other than generating attraction from girls.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/15 07:31 PM
1

Large age gaps are a relic of the past IME. A lot of it depends on the local dating market. New York City, for instance, is seeing a much bigger age gap as women significantly outnumber men and have fewer options.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/15 02:56 AM
1

Honestly, its hard not to notice the fat women. The loudest women in a group is almost always a fat one. And with something like 50-60% of older women being overweight, its the norm.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/15 02:52 AM
1

She starts to receive more male attention and has a higher perceived SMV because you think she is more likely to give a more enjoyable sexual encounter Even my most conservatively dressed cute female friends get hit on if they go to a club. No, she won't have sex if she never leaves her house, but the bar is not that high. Now, take a male, 6.5 looks, he doesn't have as many avenues to be more sexual and revealing without being called a weirdo or a creep. He can use humor and charisma. Alternate…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/15 02:50 AM
1

I think a guy can build his marriage value as he gets older yeah. I have found many women will fuck you as a way to get into a relationship. There was a good story a while back from a guy who start getting laid a lot more after he became a doctor.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/15 02:47 AM
1

If all a woman has to offer is looks than she has nothing to offer beyond sex. Why would i date such a one deminisional person? Fuck sure, but fucking randos gets boring. TBH I have seen little to suggest your average 35 year old women have a better personality than your average 25 year old women. If anything, they seem more stubborn and demanding.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/15 02:46 AM
5

all these women ever wanted was "easy" and "fun." To be fair, the women do appear to actually contribute to society. They work on charity boards, volunteer in school, and are active in their children's lives. I would definitely agree that contributing to society because you want to is much more enjoyable than because you need to earn a living.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/15 02:13 AM
6

This says a lot more about the author than these women. She talks about how powerless they are, yet they make a clear contribution to society, no financial concerns and mostly get to do what they want to do.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/15 02:10 AM
2

And materialists. You know, the people who may say "money isn't everything", but try to accumulate stuff as rapidly as possible. If you aren't working your ass off to earn money and piling on debt to finance an exorbant lifestyle, you are a failure to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/15 01:34 AM
3

women acting like women are viewed as lower value and a betrayal to the female gender by certain groups of individuals The Red Pill is value neutral, unless you count Sexual and Marriage Market Value, in which case women are only compared to each other and being feminine is a bonus. The people judging you are ones you don't want to associate with anyway. They are: materialists, who believe that the goal of life is endless accumulation of more wealth. If you aren't earning as much money as possib…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/15 01:31 AM
1

just don't think she should do it because she's a woman. I have seen this argument a lot. I don't mind cleaning, but it brings gender politics into a situation where it shouldn't. I don't think someone should do something because she is a woman, but because she is my girlfriend. I genuinely don't care how women in general behave. Only the ones I date. If this is too burdensome for you, thats fine. Just don't try and make it about womankind as whole.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/15 12:48 AM
1

. Twice the number of parents equals half the welfare amount payable per child, right? Its possibly worse than you think. When looking at combined income, they give you very harsh diminishing returns for extra spouses. IE The Earned Income Tax Credit starts the married couple off 5 thousand dollars higher for determining benefits. to completely overhaul the welfare system for parents altogether. There should NEVER be an acceptable financial incentive for the government to impose deemed paternity…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/15 12:44 AM
3

You have to understand the reason behind this. Woman want a guy with a life outside of her who is willing to walk away. A guy who has something important going on is going to do these things. He will turn down dates or act disinterested because he is busy and has other things going on. He is setting aside time in his busy schedule to date this chick. If the woman acts disrespectfully towards him, he is naturally going to spend less time with her. The Red Pill strongly encourages members to actua…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/15 12:27 AM
1

It's not clear to me that the tradeoff is usually, let alone always, worth it. The big gain is that it keeps you vigilant in your LTR. Many people let themselves go after getting in a relationship. or give in to their spouse to make her happy, and cause her to leave you in the process. Once you recognize women are frequently testing you and know what to look out for, you have much more success in LTRs in addition to short term dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/15 12:18 AM
2

No proponent is going to admit it, but helping the poor woman is only half the problem. One of the main purposes of alimony is to prevent the poorer spouse from going on welfare. Alimony acts as a tax reduction measure by pushing the bill onto the husband if the wife can't support herself.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/15 12:15 AM
1

Heroes of the Storm has done it even better. Its a huge boon for the casual crowd.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/15 03:13 AM
1

In theory you develop a skill set that complements your partner and add value by doing things he either can't or doesn't want to. One of the difficulties of the last few decades is that men and women are taught to fulfil the same roles, so spouses end up competing over the same things instead of each having their own sphere of influence. When this happens, the only thing you really bring into the relationship is sex and (maybe) your amazing personality.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/15 03:11 AM
1

You underestimate just how much the variety matters. I look through 5-10 porn videos before I find one worth finishing too, and thats with a rating system that filters out worthless content. In the VHS days, I would go broke trying to rent even 1/5th of the content I look at.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/15 03:06 AM
1

Are women are supposed to feel bad about this? Supposed to, no. Many do feel bad about being unable to find a guy though. Every guy who stays home watching porn means one less woman who can get laid that night. Its not good for either sex unless your goal is to be alone.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/15 03:03 AM
1

The problem is feminism heavily pushes the whole "rape culture" and "microaggressions" thing, which is essentially men pursuing women and women getting scared.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/15 02:59 AM
1

Its a sad truth. Reddit really shines a light on it. Look how many people will say "Please stop bothering me while I am in public".
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/15 02:58 AM
6

The government's solution to this is to make it an actual debt. They pay the mother through welfare and bill the father once he gets out of prison.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/15 02:52 AM
2

This isn't just an American thing. Heck, the French can't even get a paternity test without a court order or the mother's consent.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/15 02:38 AM
3

I won't disagree, but you need to change women's behavior to fix this, not men. They value confidence and holding frame, which come from an abundance mentality and experience. Convince women to stop going after the confident player and men will stop aspiring to be confident players.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/15 02:35 AM
1

I just don't get why RP seems to think premarital sex for men won't be a negative. TBH, because formost women confidence and game are much more important than virginity. Having sex with women gives you confidence and basic technique. On the flip side, guys are much less concerned with these traits.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/15 02:16 AM
3

You and he are wired differently. If you want to reduce stress and solve the problem, accept that you are the superior multitasker. Give him the information in written form. Or wait till he isn't busy. If instead you want to improve your husband's multitasking skills through brute force, frustration and nagging, then keep doing what you are doing.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/15 01:57 AM
1

I don't know how difficult it is, but it would be nice if someone could create an auto-updating copy of the subreddit on a third party site, which could easily be switched to if the sub went down.
/r/TheRedPill21/05/15 01:51 AM
1

I personally don't think they will even consider banning TRP because we do no harm here and don't threaten anyone personally We change the narrative, and narrative is everything to feminists. You see tons of posts from guys saying that they changed their life based on advice from this subreddit.
/r/TheRedPill21/05/15 01:48 AM
1

Some people might argue that women just naturally obsess over trivial domestic matters, but I'm not buying it I don't think its limited to domestic master, but I see the same trivial obsession in the workplace and suspect it is instinctive.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/15 01:42 AM
2

They simply won't see it in themselves, if it's present in them. Meh, people rarely change, but some small fraction will have the self awareness to change their behavior after reading this.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/15 01:40 AM
2

Constantly having to repeat myself irritates me, making me more likely to go into nag mode over something that I would otherwise shrug off. Give it to him in a format he can look at whenever he is no longer busy, like a list. This will do a lot to alleviate your frustration and make sure he does it how you want it done. The issue from the guys perspective is that he doesn't feel like you respect what he is doing when you just ask him to drop everything and work on your project.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/15 01:38 AM
2

One difference is that this can actually be solved. For instance, the woman could create a list of the things that need to be done and give it to him to look at when he is no longer busy. The problem with nagging is that there is no way for the man to really stop it. Even if he listens the first time and immediately jumps onto what she wants, he is still going to screw up some times, and then the nagging starts. The issue from the guys perspective is that he doesn't feel like you respect what he…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/15 01:35 AM
5

women are are evaluated differently based on the man's goal? Bingo. Men value sex more than women and women value relationships more than men. For many women, a high status guy tends to be an aphrodisiac. /r/relationships had a good post about this from a guy who was getting laid a lot more after he became a doctor. He complained they would often try to leverage this into a relationship. You just don't see the opposite, men don't offer sex to try and convince the woman to date him. Upping your S…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/15 12:54 AM
5

but very few youths have some wisdom. The cool thing is that in a relationship you can ask your partner for advice. The only trait a young foolish person truly needs is the ability to recognize wise people and listen to them. This is why the ideal partner for a smart, high status man is a younger, more submissive woman. That is the ideal LTR material.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/15 12:44 AM
8

This relationship was bound to end. I know that most high school relationships end, but no need to be so pessimistic. There are a few couples who are able to actually stay together from a young age. You just need the right culture and mindset.
/r/TheRedPill21/05/15 12:19 AM
7

Its amazing how little parents will notice about their kids. When you only see your kids for a few hours a day, you miss a lot.
/r/TheRedPill21/05/15 12:17 AM
9

Its more complex than just welfare. I suspect contraceptives and industrialization(which resulted in women entering the workplace) were the biggest changes. Suddenly, women were living on their own in large numbers working jobs in the city. They could even have unattached sex without getting pregnant. Of course, contraceptives fail and in the heat of the moment people don't use them.
/r/TheRedPill21/05/15 12:07 AM
2

Churches most definitely do not want to destroy hypergamy. They are terrified of speaking out against divorce or single mothers. For the most part, they simply want hypergamy confined to marriage. If the woman is unhappy, even conservative churches won't speak out against her divorcing her "abusive" husband and have him pay child support while she looks for a better guy(who should man up and marry her). Dalrock talks about this a lot. https://dalrock.wordpress.com/2011/10/11/why-wont-these-peter…
/r/TheRedPill16/05/15 10:48 PM
2

The flip side is Reddit loses money every year. From a business perspective the site is terribly run.
/r/TheRedPill16/05/15 10:43 PM
1

I'd like to be optimistic and hope that the exponential growth of technology and the internet might lead to new forms of social organization that just let people do their own thing, and not have this team woman vs team man bullshit going on like we currently do in the cultural discourse. Maybe one day, but for most women its not going to be possible to raise a kid on your own anytime soon. Right now thats the government handles this through welfare and child support. Remove that and she is going…
/r/TheRedPill16/05/15 10:41 PM
1

The problem is the right doesn't really embrace traditionalism. Yes, they want people to get married and have kids, but if a mom is unhappy and wants to divorce, they will call her a brave single parent leaving an abusive deadbeat husband. Churches are terrified of calling out women on their bullshit and instead tell men they need to be a super beta to keep a woman around. In some ways its worse than the left because of the dishonesty involved.
/r/TheRedPill16/05/15 10:38 PM
1

If you guys could fix your economy I would consider moving there.
/r/TheRedPill16/05/15 10:36 PM
0

If a woman is intelligent, then she shouldn't be saying stupid things that need to be called out.
/r/TheRedPill16/05/15 10:32 PM
1

Kind of feel like this would only work with women who have low self-esteem and very little intelligence If the woman is behaving intelligently, she won't say stupid shit that needs to be called out. Unintelligent women with high self esteem are terrible and should be avoided anyway.
/r/TheRedPill16/05/15 10:31 PM
2

Who the fuck downvoted me? Downvotes don't neccesarily mean disagreement. Your post lacked content.
/r/TheRedPill16/05/15 10:30 PM
12

She comes off as very self absorbed. I doubt she has even considered the possibility that the Alpha won't commit to her.
/r/TheRedPill16/05/15 09:57 PM
5

You have the option to move. While nowhere near perfect, some cultures are just much better than others. For instance, I live in the Southern US in a small town and it supports a much more masculine culture than when I lived in a big city. There certainly are sacrifices to living where I do, but the women are on average better.
/r/TheRedPill16/05/15 08:23 PM
8

And a 50 year old who wishes he was 40.
/r/TheRedPill16/05/15 08:17 PM
2

Personally I am amazed that the number is that low.
/r/TheRedPill16/05/15 08:15 PM
1

so that's a moot point Your first post was about the difficulties of starting a family on your salary....
/r/TheRedPill14/05/15 11:18 PM
1

It helped a lot when I realized that when women said "My ex is a manipulative bastard" they probably meant "My ex is straightforward about what he wants and didn't care about me, which made me want him more".
/r/TheRedPill14/05/15 11:17 PM
2

The opportunities might be worth it, but my point is that your inability to support a family is not a factor of the modern economy, but a result of choices you have made. There are plenty of places here that will hire a tech guy outside of San Fransisco. My company even has a few computer scientists. I mean, I am paying 520 a month for rent at my 1BR apartment. In another year I can buy a decent house and an acre of land for under 200k. Cheap houses are 65k.
/r/TheRedPill14/05/15 11:11 PM
1

Worse than I thought. It amazes me how many of the people who say they have a job and struggle to pay their bills live in super expensive places like New York City or San Francisco.
/r/TheRedPill14/05/15 10:40 PM
1

Is it a natural proclivity to manipulate or is it that men are easy to manipulate when it comes to women? So by natural selection it becomes a successful mating strategy. Women manipulate each other too, hard. Guys just don't notice it as much. However, this manipulation is very important to you. If her friends do not like you, you have no hope of a good relationship with a girl.
/r/TheRedPill14/05/15 03:29 AM
1

If you are a guy with a life, the things you described would actually occur naturally. You might not text her as quickly or initiate because you are busy doing other things. You get distracted by stuff going on in your life. Sometimes, you make time for her because you are horny and enjoy her presence. What you are doing is faking it, which works but not as well as the real thing.
/r/TheRedPill14/05/15 03:02 AM
1

In theory, you should be a guy who actually has a life outside of the girl, so you will sometimes naturally be busy. This is kind of a way to fake it.
/r/TheRedPill14/05/15 02:59 AM
2

What would you do if once you started kissing her, she stops n says she wants to talk about her day? I would ignore her/tell her to shush and keep going. If she persists then I would likely break up with her. If she would rather talk about herself than have sex, then she isn't sexually attracted to you. And how do you handle the inevitable "why are you being so weird/distant with me today" comfort test? Tell her you have been busy. A big part of being alpha is having a life outside of your girlf…
/r/TheRedPill14/05/15 02:53 AM
1

Fair enough. I don't know how it works in the UK. In the US at least its very difficult to take someone's house away from them.
/r/TheRedPill14/05/15 02:24 AM
1

you'd probably find that she isn't that special and definitely isn't worth the hassle Its ironic how these women destroy themselves this way. So long as a guy has one-itis, her will both fail to please her and think she is the most amazing person in the world. When you get rid of that and view her for who she actually is, he can start actually making her happy, but quickly realizes she isn't worth it. Its destructive for the man and the woman. If women like this understood even the basics of gam…
/r/TheRedPill14/05/15 02:22 AM
2

all she has to do is claim abuse and he is out the door of his own house Thats actually fairly difficult if you aren't married. Even with an abuse claim courts aren't going to give the house to someone who isn't married and has no claim to it. He should however get a leasing agreement with her.
/r/TheRedPill14/05/15 01:32 AM
3

That blows up eventually Sadly most states don't actually care about adultery. Whether you honored your marriage vows or not makes no difference in divorce.
/r/TheRedPill14/05/15 01:27 AM
1

But I've not called her up on it. Ever. She clearly either does not understand or respect my needs. Its not about your needs. She doesn't respect you. At one point she was concerned with keeping you and did stuff to make you happy, now she thinks there is no way you will leave her. This has made you undesirable to her. You won't solve this by telling her your problems. You can't negotiate desireable. At a minimum, you should cancel the house deal and put your wedding plans on hold. I won't jump …
/r/TheRedPill14/05/15 01:21 AM
9

My best guess is it gets a similar vibe to "moe" anime. Its about cute characters doing cute things.
/r/TheRedPill13/05/15 03:20 AM
4

A lot of it is in presentation. You don't go around advertising that you watch anime or My Little Pony. You demonstrate social skills by leading with stuff people actually like. If they find out you have weird hobbies incidentally, most people won't care.
/r/TheRedPill13/05/15 03:19 AM
8

The thing is, Alex isn't even a good beta. A good beta is someone the woman can at least show off. He is the "nice guy" who does stuff for her and doesn't embarrass her. Alex is ugly and completely lacks social grace. People are repulsed by him because being seen with the dude lowers your social standing by association.
/r/TheRedPill13/05/15 03:17 AM
3

Its not just about the money. There is a sense of pride that comes from maintaining your own stuff.
/r/TheRedPill13/05/15 03:11 AM
2

They are very few in number Unfortunately, a lot of car maintenance is entering that category as parts get more compact and electronics enter every part of the vehicle.
/r/TheRedPill13/05/15 03:01 AM
18

The basic issue is that girls will develop feelings for you that you won't reciprocate. By using game and fucking them, you are inevitably going to make them like you. They may not openly state it, but thats how women operate. However, they aren't worth entering an LTR so you won't reciprocate their feelings. This is going to leave them hurt and make it harder for them to develop long term relationships in the future.
/r/TheRedPill12/05/15 03:09 AM
1

I think you underestimate how slow Mother Nature is. This sort of natural selection takes several hundred years at a minimum.
/r/TheRedPill12/05/15 02:59 AM
3

Don't give these girls the satisfaction of bedding you. No, don't make it about the girl. If you want to fuck her, fuck her. Just understand her nature.
/r/TheRedPill12/05/15 02:57 AM
4

The police would tell you to call the cops and walk away. Getting involved will make things worse.
/r/TheRedPill11/05/15 11:54 PM
1

The issue is that the consequences are completely random. Rarely is the girl in question stable. Likely both of them are crazy and could suddenly turn on you.
/r/TheRedPill11/05/15 11:31 PM
3

Two outcomes There were other people not doing anythign and you have cover Nobody is around and unless you upload it on Facebook you are fine,
/r/TheRedPill11/05/15 11:29 PM
0

Its nowhere near the cost of California. A 1BR apartment in Austin will cost you 700 a month. San Franscico is going to be 1100 a month.
/r/TheRedPill11/05/15 11:24 PM
2

You are complaining while living in the second worst city for cost of living in the US. There are plenty of other tech cities with way lower cost of living(Austin, Texas, for instance). Income is stagnant, and the cost of living is 10x what it was a generation ago. Income is stagnant relative to inflation. Cost of living has not changed very much. We have a lot more stuff you can buy nowadays, like Cellphone and Internet, but thrifty living is still doable. I am earning 50k a year and 15k of tha…
/r/TheRedPill10/05/15 06:44 AM
0

They're simply re-branded as tax-breaks. Thats somewhat of a myth though. There aren't any straight tax breaks for being married. You might benefit depending on your finances and work related benefits, but there are downsides as well. For instance, if you have kids and your wife doesn't earn much, she loses out on the Earned Income Tax Credit which she could qualify for if you weren't married.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/15 06:07 AM
2

Fat shaming, short (and/or wildly colored) hair on women, aggressive unfeminine women - Eh this is bigger on the internet than it is IRL. You do see those women but most of them are still pretty normal. The main issue is lack of hobbies and being glued to their phone, but thats true of guys as well.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/15 06:05 AM
2

but what is SMV? Sexual Marketplace Value. Its how valuable women will perceive you and how you perceive them based on commonly desired characteristics.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/15 06:02 AM
6

Is it? Here are the actual stats showing born again Christians have much higher divorce rates. http://www.religioustolerance.org/chr_dira.htm I have found that these churches tacitly support divorce by praising single mothers and putting all the pressure on men to make sure the relationship works. Women are twice as likely to initiate divorce as men and the churches provide them with moral cover to do so.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/15 05:59 AM
1

I will provide an alternate view. Its completely natural for a woman at her age to want kids. Thats not inherently a bad thing. The bad part is that this drive can lead to her deceiving you to get what she wants. She may not actually be attracted to you or downplaying her own flaws to get what she wants. If you are certain she is head over heels for you and you are certain you want kids, than go for it. Otherwise, no.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/15 05:54 AM
1

Really there's almost no difference between alimony and child support anyways so we all know it would happen. There are big differences if you don't have children or your children are adults.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/15 05:46 AM
2

It won't stop child support, but not marrying will stop alimony.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/15 05:44 AM
1

Does it piss anyone else off that alimony is simply massive theft sanctioned by governments Its not theft because you have to agree to it when you married. This isn't like taxes where the government comes after you if you don't join the system. Don't get trapped in Blue Pill thinking of blaming others for your choices. If you think marriage is a scam, don't get one.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/15 05:43 AM
1

Yep. Don't marry. If you want to settle down with someone for the rest of your life, do it but don't marry. This both benefits you and will play a small part in convincing others. I suspect that only when a substantial number of guys are just refusing to marry will society seriously consider changing the laws.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/15 05:41 AM
2

Honestly, kids are very affordable so long as you aren't living somewhere expensive. You just have to make sacrifices elsewhere and not overpay on crap for the kids.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/15 05:37 AM
8

The entire Wedding Day will stand out in my mind, because its my Wedding. I expect the food will stand out too, even though I eat food all the time. Its like, I remember having sex on Christmas Day, not because it was special sex, but because Christmas is a memorable day.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/15 05:37 AM
2

which is probably close to 10% of his post-tax income for a 50/50 split. I doubt he is taxed at anywhere near 40%. Regardless though, 2500 dollars a year for half your childs expenses is fairly reasonable.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/15 05:34 AM
3

Nowdays, its just a transfer of wealth from the richer spouse(typically the man) to the poorer one(typically the woman). With no fault divorce, there is nothing discouraging a woman from breaking her vows.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/15 05:32 AM
2

Its more that they don't care. Most of us are just trying to get our own lives sorted out.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/15 05:29 AM
9

disagree with your assessment of conservatives Conservatives are not as bad, but they have gotten onto the "delay marriage till after college and an established career" bandwagon as well as encouraging women to divorce. Dalrock explains it well. https://dalrock.wordpress.com/2011/10/11/why-wont-these-peter-pan-manboys-man-up-and-marry-aging-flighty-selfish-career-gal-sluts-already/
/r/TheRedPill10/05/15 05:29 AM
2

I would if the cost of living wasn't so high. I will stick to Texas.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/15 05:26 AM
1

In order to enforce this we would have to be willing to actually let old people starve to death on the streets though. Which is why its compulsory.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/15 05:24 AM
1

If you are serious, move somewhere cheaper to live. Rent is your biggest expense. If you are in tech and struggling, then you are simply in a too high cost of living area. I am currently paying 520 a month for a large 1 bedroom apartment. A 2 bedroom would run 700 a month. This is only doable because I live somewhere cheap. I know plenty of families who survive off of modest incomes in my area. Its hard, but doable.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/15 05:21 AM
2

Malthus was predicting overpopulation in the late 1700s. We only held it off thanks to the agricultural revolution(which in his defense was completely unpredictable).
/r/TheRedPill10/05/15 05:12 AM
1

you have likely met plenty of trans folks who also just want to be recognized as a man/woman and just don't know it. Personally I have found it very noticeable. The bone structure is completely different. I have never been surprised when someone has told me they are trans.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/15 04:53 AM
1

Homosexuality doesn't negatively affect your life unless you want biological children with your SO. Gender dysphoria is inherently bad.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/15 04:25 AM
1

They have been talking about it for over 2 years. Nothing is going to happen.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/15 04:21 AM
3

Fundamentalists have sided with the feminists on this issue. They are convinced it's men's fault for being weak. Its gotten to the point where they even praise single mothers. Dalrock had a good post on this. https://dalrock.wordpress.com/2011/10/11/why-wont-these-peter-pan-manboys-man-up-and-marry-aging-flighty-selfish-career-gal-sluts-already/
/r/TheRedPill10/05/15 03:02 AM
4

there is bullshit with breast milk. It is good, but most women do not produce enough milk and children goes to sleep hungry (and cries all night of course). That starts negative spiral... Typically the solution to this is just to mix the breast milk with formula.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/15 01:55 AM
6

Completely agree. Fortunately, an increasing number of people are just not marrying. Europe seems to be figuring it out first. 40% of children live with unmarried parents in the UK. the US is not at that point but its increasing here as well. I suspect that at some point in our lifetime(not soon, but maybe 20-30 years from now) marriage will either be abolished or overhauled.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/15 01:52 AM
1

There is truth in this. There are girls out there who I would much rather spend time with than on porn or video games, but there are also a lot of girls who just aren't worth it.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/15 01:30 AM
1

Our government is based on excess production and consumption to generate tax revenue and support the next generation. Someone has to support the elderly, single moms, the lazy and the disabled. The single guys are just following their own interests. Do the minimum you need to support yourself and do your own thing. Essentially, acting like single women. This scares society because our welfare state won't work with that.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/15 01:21 AM
3

Oh right, all those men are not out there working to generate wealth to be transferred to undeserving women... Not just that, our entire welfare state is based on excess productivity. Taxes are progressive. Somebody has to support the elderly, lazy, disabled, single moms, etc. And women can only delay marriage so long while they search for a guy to support them. I think in the next 5 years we are going to see a lot of women freaking out that they can't find a guy to support them when they want t…
/r/TheRedPill10/05/15 01:13 AM
8

Oh man, imagine if the those rich beta guys could suddenly just buy sex instead of getting hooked into relationships. Women would go ballistic.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/15 12:43 AM
3

Movies TV and Music aren't great, but they are a bit better than video games because they at least give you something to talk about with the general public(and women in particular).
/r/TheRedPill10/05/15 12:41 AM
1

Why are competitive video games looked down at? If someone says "I play games" when asked for their hobbies, that tells me they probably don't do much else. Its not that games are inherently bad, but they aren't good either and someone who does nothing else isn't going anywhere in life.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/15 12:38 AM
3

The ironic part is video games are one of the few remaining areas dominated by men.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/15 12:36 AM
5

or assure love with a contract, Love has never been a requirement of the marriage contract. Originally, marriage was just a property contract. The women gave up her reproductive rights(in the form of sex and kids) in return for the mans property rights. You either had to prove your spouse violated the contract or abandon them and pay the penalty for doing so. You couldn't ensure that the couple has a happy marriage, but you could provide strong incentives to stay married and uphold their end of …
/r/TheRedPill10/05/15 12:28 AM
3

At a minimum, don't conflate marriage with children. Even if you plan on having children, don't marry. There is no reason to add on the risk of alimony to the risk of child support.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/15 12:16 AM
13

My theory is that marriage actually rewards breaking up. Women are twice as likely to initiate divorce as men. Women also get roughly 90% of alimony money. By getting married to someone who earns less than you(or will earn less in the future) you are giving them an incentive to end it.
/r/TheRedPill09/05/15 11:22 PM
10

It has not always been a scam. 60 years ago getting a divorce was difficult. It took many months and one partner had to prove wrongdoing or both partners had to agree to it(in the US at least). The issue is no fault divorce. it makes marriage vows meaningless and allows a woman who has decided she is bored to divorce and collect cash and prizes for breaking her vows.
/r/TheRedPill09/05/15 10:56 PM
10

Its becoming increasingly common(especially in Europe) to have kids without being married. You save a lot of money on the wedding and if you are having kids marriage will likely increase your tax burden anyway. That is my plan. Modern day marriage is essentially a transfer of wealth and power from the richer spouse to the poorer one(with a slight bias towards women).
/r/TheRedPill09/05/15 10:51 PM
6

Its more an indictment of marriage than anything else. You are right in that even without marriage you are going to regularly have sex anyway so sex on the wedding night isn't a big deal. But then whats the point of getting married? As the higher earning partner(which most men are) you put a lot of money at risk and no real benefit.
/r/TheRedPill09/05/15 10:47 PM
12

Its more about setting the tone. When you look back on your wedding night 10 years down the line, you will have prefered you had sex.
/r/TheRedPill09/05/15 10:43 PM
1

Marriage is now the formation of a "team", a business partnership rife with tax breaks, cash, and prizes. Sadly you don't even get this much of the time. Often times marriage will raise your tax bill. You lose access to a lot of tax breaks and possible benefits.
/r/TheRedPill09/05/15 10:42 PM
-1

Teenagers have more health complications in pregnancy/childbirth than adults. That stops being true at roughly 16. Heck, most of the risk goes away by 14(which is why the UN generally encourages impoverished countries to at least wait until 14 before marrying their daughters off).
/r/TheRedPill25/10/14 11:17 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter