TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Ship2Shore Archive

View 0 posts and 69 comments by Ship2Shore on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-19

Yeah having your period is a great little holiday! /s This thread is full of incels who have never interacted with a female before...
/r/MensRights12/05/22 08:29 AM
2

Theres always a cultural "war" on what is and what isn't feminine or masculine. Hence the kings of the slave force that built the great pyramids wearing makeup, yet here you are having a whinge about nail polish. Maybe nail polish isn't actually feminine? Ooh boy, what if I told you, footy players shave their legs! What poofs! Those masculine poofs that could bounce your head off the ground. I can't believe they get their hair cut and beard trimmed every week. Poofs! Ew, some even dye their gay …
/r/MensRights12/07/21 01:42 PM
6

I agree, but ironically I think the campaign intrinsically suggests the toxic masculinity that males who target others for wearing nail polish enact, is because it is less masculine... if it specifically regards homosexuality, that's a gaffe, as it could be effective in breaking stereotypes of males who utilise feminine aspects. I highly doubt it's aimed at males targeting females for wearing make-up nail polish... So who would it be aimed at? Males projecting toxic masculinity on other males? T…
/r/MensRights12/07/21 12:49 PM
2

Of course a female can be a plumber, but that's an absolute fallacy based on nothing at all, that women are physically as strong as men. It's literally one of our most stark physiological differences between the sexes. They will always be out competed in these physical jobs. As automation comes in, tools make every job easier, machines do most of it, you can afford to provide more equal representation.
/r/MensRights16/12/19 07:28 PM
15

When the castle is built, everyone wants a seat in the dining hall... The fact of the matter is, males have overwhelmingly been the more proficient sex in terms of what society has required... We need roads, we need hospitals, we need shelter, we need water, we need energy... Most of these demands are met by males... Can a female find a great paying job at a mine site? Of course, perhaps as a driver, but it's overwhelmingly men working a mile underground, changing drill heads, jackhammering, etc…
/r/MensRights16/12/19 11:00 AM
1

Like old mate said, focus your battles. What you're doing here is needlessly encouraging false equality, which is far more dangerous for men. For one, you are first apparently noticing this, then trying to make a point on somebody else's behalf, and then fight that false battle. This "scenario" isn't going unnoticed, its going completely noticed, that's the point. If this dude had a problem, he wouldn't do it in front of thousands of people in person and millions more ON LIVE RECORDED TV. He IS …
/r/MensRights28/08/19 01:30 AM
10

Plus kayaking is done on the river. I ain't paying for a ticket mister, I'm just gonna go watch from down the river a bit there, oh, you're gonna throw me out!? I'm already out! It's a river! Id just go hide out by the rocks, the kayakers are getting zero of my dollars. Can't sneak into a stadium as easy. Maybe I'm too hung up on the analogy? Stadiums have huge overheads that need to be covered consistently. Once a vested stadium can rely on your business, they are more likely to sponsor you a w…
/r/MensRights08/07/19 10:12 PM
8

Big shock, Western society is white... There's another thing called over representation.
/r/MensRights21/04/19 09:09 AM
0

Comprehend what though? Try and distinctly tell me what it is I do not comprehend.
/r/MensRights31/01/19 01:52 AM
1

So first you bandwagon off somebody else's comment, then you get triggered, then you get the definition of a word wrong, then you completely misunderstand the point of a forum... Lol, you are a fucking loser.
/r/MensRights31/01/19 12:23 AM
1

Right, we were talking about sexual harassment bordering assault. Which are forms of sexual abuse.
/r/MensRights30/01/19 10:51 PM
0

I agree, but can you list a culture that actively promotes rape and assault? Rape and assault is common in Western marriage, and was even permissable by law until recently https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marital_rape It is still common for many countries and cultures to turn an eye towards these acts. Much of Asia have patriarchal households. The middle east have many customs that denigrate the rights of females. Africa is pointless because they don't even keep stats, the sexual violence there i…
/r/MensRights30/01/19 10:40 PM
1

Oh, please show me. At its most basic statistic, it clearly establishes 1 in 3 females are sexually abused, compared to 1 in 5 males, who are often abused by other males.
/r/MensRights30/01/19 10:01 PM
1

You're picking apart literally ONE word that YOU got wrong. It's clearly not incoherent, you just can't admit that you were triggered by a word and after that you couldn't do basic comprehension. That's what happens when you are triggered. You are the clear example of somebody being triggered by one apparently feminist only word. What a fuckin loser.
/r/MensRights30/01/19 09:51 PM
0

For instance, sex with minors (read: "teens") when it's a male perp is called raped-- rightfully. When it's a female perp, it's called "seducing" or "having sex with," because guys are praised for having lots of "conquests." For one, pedophilia and acts of molestation are predominantly carried out by males, that's a fact. This is why our society is vigilant of that particular style of courtship. Not because of the media, because it happens. The rest of your anecdotal experience is just that. Kee…
/r/MensRights30/01/19 09:35 PM
1

What. You just assumed a context in which any woman can call half a dozen men to her aid. Take yourself out of the picture.
/r/MensRights30/01/19 09:25 PM
0

You bandwagonned on to an already established point. If you reply, you are replying to the previous exchange. I don't have to point to anything you've said, because you've not made a point, you've made a statement. If you want to bandwagon at least have a point you dipshit.
/r/MensRights30/01/19 01:57 PM
-1

Can't quote anything can you? You are a pathetic person.
/r/MensRights30/01/19 01:31 PM
-2

Cherry picking your link much? It specifically refers to the differences in reciprocal and non reciprocal violence occurring injury. Very specific. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domestic_violence_in_Australia https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domestic_violence_in_the_United_States https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/domestic-violence/family-domestic-sexual-violence-in-australia-2018/contents/summary https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/23393954/ Women are drastically more often the victim, and men …
/r/MensRights30/01/19 01:06 PM
-1

Oh nice observation, and thanks for the benefit you smug fuck. Did you also notice he has what looks to be a beer in his hand? He's also been filmed sneakily, without intervention, or need for rescue. He also doesn't exit the vicinity or chose to even free his hand to defend himself. Why? Because he's clearly not in any danger. No means no but sometimes people don't get that, and sometimes it's not always definitive. Does that inherently make them a bad person, particularly when you have zero co…
/r/MensRights30/01/19 12:48 PM
0

Where have I said ANYTHING to excuse her behaviour? Just quote it, directly lift it from my text. Are you just being obtuse or are you retarded? I clearly state that is harassment. What I'm objecting is the title, and reversing the sexes. This has nothing to do with men's rights.
/r/MensRights30/01/19 12:38 PM
-1

The point is "iMaGinE iF tHe RoLeS wERe ReveRsED!" is a fucking idiotic way to think.
/r/MensRights30/01/19 12:14 PM
0

On a forum? What is the intention of this format?
/r/MensRights30/01/19 03:14 AM
-2

Males are born with an inherent advantage. After that it's privelege. A female can work out to become stronger than a male that was born with a physical advantage. Furthermore, both males and females born with the same inherent capabilities are privy to certain privileges across different demographics that attribute to better physical capabilities.
/r/MensRights30/01/19 02:43 AM
1

Reversing roles is an idiotic trend, particularly in this "men's rights" sub. What's this got to do with men's rights?
/r/MensRights30/01/19 02:39 AM
-1

Are you just on the bandwagon or do you have a point?
/r/MensRights30/01/19 02:38 AM
-13

You've got no context, why would people be furious! With zero context he's clearly not trying to break away. There's much context you can add to this if you think people would be furious... Would they be furious if it was a drunk female trying to kiss her drunk male friend after completely misreading their own situation? That's a pretty common occurrence. Or is everything just straight up assault?
/r/MensRights30/01/19 02:35 AM
-5

You don't though, you've got mundane shit to do. Looking at your post history, your bland af. You've got nothing, no opinion even anonymously. Weak shit.
/r/MensRights30/01/19 02:31 AM
-2

Omg were all on a sppppectrummmmm. It's a generalisation you dipshit. Or are you denying the overwhelming statistics that males assault females drastically more, and drastically more physically. Oh nah yeah let's just play "reverse the roles" for everything in society, that makes sense! And for the other dipshit /u/FragrantDude, how is making a distinct observation sexist? You're an absolute faggot. And I suggest you look up the meaning of bigot, sexist and faggot before replying.
/r/MensRights30/01/19 02:29 AM
-5

Plus, the reality is some of these women could beat the shit out of me with one hand tied behind their back That's unfortunate, but the reality is, you are an outlier. It is farrrrr more common for the situation to the be the other way, that's the reality. My point is if the 100-pound male loser is gonna be prosecuted for grabbing a woman’s ass then these towering whale women should also be prosecuted when they grab the 100-pound guy’s ass. Absolutely, I agree. Never said anything to the contrar…
/r/MensRights30/01/19 02:25 AM
-19

Yeah if you want to play the victim you soft cock. With zero context of before or after or whatever skills you imagine these two might have, we can assume this male is able to exit this situation without harm. You have given this male, with zero context, all the emotion. Without context, I can assume this is a common situation that may be played off after. It may be assault, and emotional damage is being caused. You don't know though, you are providing false context. What is fact, is that most m…
/r/MensRights30/01/19 02:17 AM
-5

Haha I knew that'd trigger someone. It's synonymous with advantage if that helps you. Thanks for replying!
/r/MensRights30/01/19 02:12 AM
-15

What does that even mean? I have, and will if the situation ever arises again. I work in hospitality, I've seen plenty of women assault men, and plenty of the reverse. Women don't all of a sudden gain this social immunity in every situation, but THANKFULLY for the most part they do. Go look at the domestic abuse rates buddy. It's clearly males who do the most assaulting of females. You should already know the glaring rape statistics between the genders. So with 4 sisters (some of who have assaul…
/r/MensRights30/01/19 02:00 AM
-1

Exactly. We put up with it. Why? Because women in western society now have the power in courtship and sexual advancement. Literally only one generation ago, the standard courting practice was to ask permission from the patriarchal figure, the father. Even up until the 1980s in my country, rape was technically legal within a marriage, and divorce was illegal. Coersion through physical means was certainly an aspect to western relationships. In contemporary times, females have had a power swing. Th…
/r/MensRights30/01/19 01:51 AM
-2

Didn't argue any hypothetical beyond the interaction in question we were given. We weren't given the before, so what's the point in assuming the after? I can assume just as many guys watching will laugh at both of them and then rib the guy for getting sweated on by a whale. You don't know what crowd they were with, you're just assuming the worst case scenario.
/r/MensRights30/01/19 01:32 AM
1

Sorry to hear. Clearly the subject in question is being harassed, the point is, the sexes being reversed is irrational when there are comparable differences. I clearly state its not an excuse, nor that this isn't harassment. You were sexually harassed and you hopefully reported it, as that process is available.
/r/MensRights30/01/19 01:30 AM
-75

Yeah, they do have privilege in sexual advancement, I'm certainly not complaining about that. Except, females are clearly at a physical disadvantage, so no real privilege there, where it actually counts in this situation, males have that physical privilege. Kinda balances out. Kinda fuckin retarded to compare the sexual assault of females vs males. Like, really fuckin retarded.
/r/MensRights29/01/19 08:03 PM
-22

For a start, we live in an anti-rape, anti-assault society. However, we all know grey areas exist. This video is taken out of context, but furthermore, it seems like a few people commenting reallllly don't seem to get the differences in our sexes... How would you feel if a much more physically threatening guy started trying to kiss you? Would you think they might go beyond just trying to go in for the smooch? If this video was the other way around, we'd have a much more intimidating male holding…
/r/MensRights29/01/19 07:58 PM
1

If you are raising another man's children, you are a cuck. You can choose to be offended or not. Not everyone enters a relationship under those pretences. You are correct that divorce is high, and there are many women who had children before being married, and they can work it out between the two parents, so not everybody becomes a cuck when entering those relationships. Your case for instance, they were grown, you done no raising, financial support is up to you. I'm not a cuck to my sister if I…
/r/MensRights15/01/19 04:50 AM
18

Well, ironically, female consumers actually make up a very significant portion of the razor market. With feminism, why the fuck would you want to shave your legs and pits? You're free from expectations and hygiene. Men also only predominantly shave because of work expectations. In todays era of equality, men shouldn't have to take a razor to their face daily in order to aesthetically please the masses. See ya Gillette.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 12:17 AM
1

Yeah I concede, I was completely oblivious... America really is fucked. This is so far removed from my reality in Australia, where no such bs laws exist. Bit hard to not describe the country as circling the drain if that's the case.
/r/MensRights09/11/18 08:12 PM
-1

Which is a made up word, that doesn't exist in any legitimate dictionary, like mansplaining, that's the point you seem to miss. You are giving definition to a made up word. How do you know what she meant by manspreading? You are the one perpetuating it if you don't address it, and furthermore by bringing it up as a defensive point. It's akin to third wave feminism tactics, which is pathetic.
/r/MensRights08/11/18 08:59 PM
0

It sounds like you were accused for having a phone between your legs, not for having male genitalia...
/r/MensRights08/11/18 07:22 PM
0

And what was the result? Did absolutely nothing at all happen? She made some noises at you. How has this affected you going into the future?
/r/MensRights08/11/18 07:16 PM
-3

Again, this is anti-woman, not men's rights. We've already had kids on a train taking up seats to defend an argument nobody seems to have any actual real world issue with. Has anyone actually ever been accused or shamed for having their legs too far apart and it being referred directly because of their male gender? This isn't an issue. It never has been. We have sensitive sexual organs that hang outside our body, between our legs, any rational person with a basic understanding of anatomy either …
/r/MensRights08/11/18 06:53 AM
-7

This sub is often actively anti-woman than it is pro-man. It is too often confused that the notion of an individual woman's actions are indicative of lesser rights to men...
/r/MensRights04/11/18 08:38 PM
1

A husband has no right to sex with his wife, and, if he forces it, that's rape Which is exactly what it is... But he cannot stop her having sex with him, because that would be abuse That is absolutely not true in no way... I'd say you are obscuring the actual truth behind that one, which is that divorce can be granted to either gender for sexual failure of the defacto, which can lead to a split in assets. A husband has no right of access to his wife's money. But he cannot stop her spending his b…
/r/MensRights23/10/18 05:08 PM
1

Yeah nah, I'm not sifting through that to prove your own point. Women don't have any further unjust rights than men in Australia.
/r/MensRights23/10/18 11:12 AM
1

What further rights do they have over men?
/r/MensRights21/10/18 12:50 AM
1

Living under a rock? What's with the passive aggression sheesh, maybe it's because I live in a different state, sorry dude. https://youtu.be/IQgnrvjIUCY this is a Queensland campaign, aimed at general domestic violence. Acknowledges emotional abuse, depicts a women doing it. Acknowledges physical abuse, depicts a male perpetrator, but both female and male in their own capacity to stop it. Seems absolutely proportionate to me... Stats don't lie too much. Domestic violence is difficult to understa…
/r/MensRights20/10/18 11:15 AM
1

Look at the domestic violence campaigns where men seem to only be the aggressors Again, not true, you might just be noticing it differently... Go to Qldgov to Instagram for instance. Only mention of domestic violence depicts a women with a message saying "perpetrators of domestic violence are often really good at hiding their behaviour". Other parts of this campaign include the direct inclusion of men. For instance, on television and YouTube, a women comes into the garage where a man is fixing h…
/r/MensRights20/10/18 05:18 AM
-3

That's not true. Men's health is well-supported in Australia. Movember as mentioned has been a big thing for a number of years. Small but known companies like Grill'd have initiatives, and all the way up to government advertising, particularly with the current ads around Instagram and Facebook, we certainly have suitable awareness. I do not believe we have the same battles going on. Australian women have held rights for as long as any other country. We have proven women in leadership roles and r…
/r/MensRights19/10/18 08:42 PM
5

Yeah pacifism isn't always the best option. Silence can be taken by those types of people as some twisted admission of guilt.
/r/MensRights16/10/18 06:25 AM
8

Not to be facetious, but clothes are a social construct. Every society and culture views attire differently of course. For a number of reasons. In the west the Human form has continuously been worshipped. Quite literally the oldest carving found, dating back some 40 thousand years from Germany, we find the Venus of hohle fels. The Greeks and Romans obviously loved them some statues also. In contemporary times our most prominent feature in this regard, is celebrity idolisation. Obviously a runway…
/r/MensRights15/10/18 01:23 AM
0

No reply? Awesome moderating. How's how this (non) issue is proven to be a hoax and here still stands this thread. You are perpetuating a divide while doing absolutely nothing for men besides involving them in battles created on false premises. But you'll moderate the word faggot on false pretenses. Nice priorities.
/r/MensRights11/10/18 08:40 PM
0

How's this guy... Me, dense? You're aware the bleaching of men's crotches for "manspreading" was proven to be a hoax video? You know that don't you? You're not dense. You know why it's a hoax don't you? Of course you do, you're not dense. You know it's to perpetuate this petty division in gender, race, religion, political ideology. You are a dead set fucking idiot. Honestly, what is your problem? Some kids have their feet on the seat? What the fuck does that have to do with men's rights? What po…
/r/MensRights11/10/18 08:36 PM
0

What does it have to do with men's rights then?
/r/MensRights10/10/18 08:47 PM
1

Yeah exactly, I was being facetious. Annoyance is the normal extent of the feeling, it shouldn't be a problem for any mature person, of any age. I just have a problem with kids being used in a sub called MENS rights.
/r/MensRights10/10/18 11:33 AM
0

Explain how it's ignorant? It's absolutely been in continued usage, particularly by smart asses who are fully aware of its historical usage and meaning. Now you tell me what faggot means? Does it mean homosexual? Why? Because people who were homosexuals were burned using bundles of sticks? Find me that historical usage. It's always referred to an individual being a burden. It's a double entendre for a pile of sticks; they are burdensome to carry, but also the people who collected these sticks di…
/r/MensRights10/10/18 11:30 AM
2

Yeah, I apologise for the personal shit. And yeah it does effect my day, it's a scenario I see everyday. To make it an issue let alone as fodder for some imaginary war does effect me in here as well, because this sub is quickly turning into some shitty meninsm, not men's rights. The only reason I personally attacked, and its not an excuse just an explanation, is that I hope it affects you in some way that does make you think about how hard you want to defend it. I don't know you, don't take it p…
/r/MensRights10/10/18 11:21 AM
0

How rude of them! Fucking females amiright men! /s It's fucking sad and pathetic. Their gender has nothing to do with this.
/r/MensRights10/10/18 12:30 AM
1

What a fucking crisis.
/r/MensRights10/10/18 12:29 AM
0

Honestly because you have nothing. How can you try to defend yourself by using kids to prove some petty point. You're a loser. This affecting your day really shows what little you have to offer to the world, it's pathetic.
/r/MensRights10/10/18 12:28 AM
0

I'm specifically referring to a faggot as in a bundle of sticks. It was first used as a slur, in the way I am using it, to refer to people being burdensome. This has nothing to do with homosexuality, the fact that you jumped to that conclusion shows a seriously unhealthy angle in twisting the context of a word or sentence, and someone with power such as a moderator should probably enquire before assuming. Words have multiple meanings.
/r/MensRights10/10/18 12:23 AM
-4

These are kids, and you're a fucking loser for even trying to compare a situation that doesn't exist.
/r/MensRights09/10/18 08:05 AM
-8

Jesus christ, you faggots. Seriously, how old are these girls? Does it look like a problem for the boys they are sitting with? Get the fuck off your high horses, this is the bullshit that makes the world blind. Manspreading is not a thing, womenspreading is not a thing. Don't create some stupid, petty divide. Even the idea of bleach being thrown around is a fucking disgrace, because like those socially inept females that think they are fighting the good fight, men too are just as vulnerable at t…
/r/MensRights09/10/18 08:04 AM
3

I think that's more on the journalist. Their gender is irrelevant to the situation, and so doesn't need to be added or even asked.
/r/MensRights30/08/18 08:16 PM
26

I think it's worth noting that we've just had a couple of generations of fathers with undiagnosed ptsd from war.
/r/MensRights25/08/18 08:50 AM
29

Apparently your daughter decided not to get a skill or qualification before she decided to get pregnant. Unfortunately it's this mind set that is the crux of the problem.
/r/MensRights26/07/18 10:06 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter